TSA Chief Admits The New Pat-Downs Are 'More Invasive'

For the second day in a row, TSA head Jon Pistole was testifying before Senate about the recent negative attention that the agency’s full-body scanners and ‘enhanced’ pat-downs have received. And Pistole admitted that the newer, hands-on procedure is more touchy-feely than it had been previously.

“Yes, it was more invasive than what I was used to,” Mr. Pistole said about his own experience with the new pat-down procedure. “The bottom line is we need to provide for the best possible security.”

Pistole explained that the rationale for the controversial procedure is thus: If a passenger opts out of a full-body scan, they still need to have a pat-down that is just as thorough as the scanner would have been.

Perhaps believing the CBS poll which said 81% of Americans approve of full-body scanners — and not believing the 87% of Consumerist voters who disagreed — Pistole, who loves the phrase “bottom line,” said the “Bottom line is, few people will actually receive those pat-downs.

He used the analogy that if passengers had the option of getting on two planes to the same destination — one which had been fully screened but which took a little longer and required scanners or pat-downs, and the other with no screening — “I think everyone will want to opt for the screening with the assurance that everything is safe and secure.”

Feel free to watch the thrilling video here. Skip to around 23:00 to bypass all the Senators’ opening remarks about their hip and knee replacements.

Want more consumer news? Visit our parent organization, Consumer Reports, for the latest on scams, recalls, and other consumer issues.