Share:
Add to Favorites   |  

Do You Have Any Naked Pictures Of Your Mother? The TSA Does

23929 views

The TSA recently announced that airport security scanners which can see under clothing are being installed at 10 U.S. airports, according to the AFP. Travelers will enter glass booths while a 3-dimensional full-body image is rendered using "millimeter waves." Because the image gives a clear representation of travelers' bodies and genitalia, it has some people concerned about their privacy. More, inside...

The article says,

While it allows the security screeners -- looking at the images in a separate room -- to clearly see the passenger's sexual organs as well as other details of their bodies, the passenger's face is blurred, TSA said in a statement on its website.

The scan only takes seconds and is to replace the physical pat-downs of people that is currently widespread in airports.

TSA began introducing the body scanners in airports in April, first in the Phoenix, Arizona terminal.

The installation is picking up this month, with machines in place or planned for airports in Washington (Reagan National and Baltimore-Washington International), Dallas, Las Vegas, Albuquerque, Miami and Detroit.

But the new machines have provoked worries among passengers and rights activists.

"People have no idea how graphic the images are," Barry Steinhardt, director of the technology and liberty program at the American Civil Liberties Union, told AFP.

The ACLU said in a statement that passengers expecting privacy underneath their clothing "should not be required to display highly personal details of their bodies such as evidence of mastectomies, colostomy appliances, penile implants, catheter tubes and the size of their breasts or genitals as a pre-requisite to boarding a plane."

Besides masking their faces, the TSA says on its website, the images made "will not be printed stored or transmitted."

"Once the transportation security officer has viewed the image and resolved anomalies, the image is erased from the screen permanently. The officer is unable to print, export, store or transmit the image."

Lara Uselding, a TSA spokeswoman, added that passengers are not obliged to accept the new machines.

"The passengers can choose between the body imaging and the pat-down," she told AFP.

Even if we trust the TSA to blur the faces of travelers and properly dispose of the naked images, and we don't, we believe the TSA has reached yet another milestone in violating our privacy. We appreciate the fact that the TSA is allowing us to choose between the full-body-scan and a pat-down, as if giving us some choice absolves them from any criticism. So which would you prefer, being groped by the TSA or letting them take your naked picture?

Scanners that see through clothing installed in US airports [AFP] (Thanks to Bladefist!)
(Photo: Getty)

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam malesuada commodo erat et molestie. Duis pellentesque aliquam bibendum. Suspendisse venenatis lobortis eleifend. Mauris id est sed lectus convallis aliquam.

Post a comment

Comments:

174
user-pic

I'd rather they let me bring my water bottle on the plane and keep my shoes on during the scan. That wasn't one of the choices, though, was it?

user-pic

damnit Jay, I was just about settled in and comfy for the day ahead and then I read this headline. you definitely blew that plan up. ass

=)

user-pic

I take some solace in the fact that my naked body will horrify the TSA.

user-pic

Can't I have both?


---The Exhibitionist

user-pic

How long do you think it will take before those image compilations start showing up on YouTube (with appropriate music, of course)?

user-pic

If I write "Fuck You, TSA Asshat" on my chest in sharpie, will they see that on the scanner?

user-pic

Currently TSA staff can't seem to consistently agree on what is and isn't allowed in carry-on luggage. I do not doubt there will be similar confusion about passengers' "choice" of a pat-down or the scan.

user-pic

"So which would you prefer, being groped by the TSA or letting them take your naked picture?"

Neither. I prefer to not fly. period.

user-pic

They did some quick polling on the issue, and I can't believe this, but most people said it wasn't a big deal. Excuse me? It's definitely a big deal. The excuse that the TSA can't save the image, or that you'll never see them again, is a shoddy one.

user-pic

If we can get hot women and guys doing the patdowns, I will call it even stevens. (Only if the appropriate opposite sex does the pat-down).

user-pic

Weasel words? When you're hiding the truth, you love to use them. Did you catch the weasel words in these quotes?

"the image is erased from the screen permanently."

The image is erased permanently... FROM THE SCREEN. Not from the hard drive. There is a very clear distinction there, and they're making it.

The officer is unable to print, export, store or transmit the image."

The OFFICER who is operating the device is unable to do those things. But that does not mean that the software itself isn't designed to do one or any number of those things. They didn't deny that the technology is capable of doing those things. Rather, they deny that those features are under direct control of the officer.

Further, if the NSA or FBI or some other agency (outside of the TSA) wanted to collect these records in the name of some terrorism operation, there would be little if nothing to stop them.

user-pic

Onoez, they'll see my Prince Albert!

BFD, I don't think anyone wants to see most airline travelers naked.

user-pic

Anyone else now unable to get the Electric Six song, 'Naked Pictures of your Mother, out of their head?

user-pic

Will not anyone think of the children?

Seriously, what option do they have? Somehow neither of these seems appropriate, at least not for anyone outside of NAMBLA.

user-pic

@mantari: Exactly. Lets say you take a gun, or a knife in with you. The TSA sees it. How are they going to prosecute you? They need the stored images.

user-pic

After you've seen so many grandma boobies, they just become boring.

user-pic

This is a perfect example of how every day there is a new reason to not fly.

I was reading the comments on Fark.com about this article, and here is my favorite comment:

bahknee: PS - The terrorists have won. Not only are we terrified, we are completely stripping OURSELVES of any and all privacy.

/I'd move, but the husband says no.
//btw, how long has our "threat level" been orange?

QFT

user-pic

Nothing says sexy like a pregnant chick with a glass of wine and a smoke.

user-pic

Frankly, I don't care. If they can do this instead of taking me take everything out of my pockets, take off my shoes and belt, and yell at me like I'm as dumb as they are, I'm all for it.

user-pic

For every security people so desperately ask for, you give up freedom and to reply to about 3 or 4 people, yes the terrorists have won (agreeing with heavylee-again).

@heavylee-again: Yea, to be honest in or within 10 years I'll most likely be moving to another country, i'm not sure, I love America a lot but its becoming disturbing. Ever read 1984? thats America within the next 100 years. European countries are already heading that way a little more than us.

user-pic

@Jones91: Where would you move? Most other 1st world countries are upping security. They might not be to this point yet, but they will be.

user-pic

Yeah...this will never, of course, be abused by bored moonlighting security personnel.

user-pic

@freshyill: Whatever makes you think all that will change?

user-pic

@HIV 2 Elway: Nothing says sexy like a pregnant chick with a glass of wine and a smoke.

Actually, attractive women who are pregnant are very sexy to me. Minus the wine and smoke, I like the pic above.

user-pic

@Jones91: Good god. I can't go through a day without seeing a comment comparing the USA to 1984. Have you even READ the book? Our situation may not be ideal but let's not exaggerate things here. We haven't quite gotten to you know, that whole "boot stamping on a human face - forever" stage.

user-pic

Yeah and how long before we find out that "millimeter waves" give you cancer?

user-pic

@heavylee-again: Yeah, I was referring to the sexiness of a woman with complete disregard for the health of her unborn baby. Not so much.

user-pic

i choose whatever one is quicker, or a pat down if the TSA employee is hot

user-pic

Sweet! How do I sign up to be a TSA guy?

user-pic

Hey, if the scan is a substitute for the cavity search it's a win for airline passengers.

user-pic

Are they going to have two different people to look at the scans? Each for the respective gender?

user-pic

"Currently TSA staff can't seem to consistently agree on what is and isn't allowed in carry-on luggage. I do not doubt there will be similar confusion about passengers' "choice" of a pat-down or the scan."

Yup, I hear that.

user-pic

It's just another sign that the revolution is approaching. Wolverines!

user-pic

Somehow I have a feeling if it's a woman doing the scanning when I walk through they will probably ask me out. ;)

Seriously, this is yet another reason I don't fly.

user-pic

Just because the TSA people can't save the picture themselves, doesn't mean they cant pull out their camera phone and capture the screen real quick

user-pic

Scissors, aluminum foil, glue. I will cut out the tinfoil letters "NSFW" and place them on the appropriate body parts before I head to the airport.

user-pic

Simple solution. Stop flying. Go to airports where they are not doing this. This is not acceptable.

user-pic

Industrial Society and Its Future begins with Kaczynski's assertion that "the Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race." The first sections of the text are devoted to psychological analyses of various groups-primarily leftists and scientists-and of the psychological consequences for the individual of life within the "industrial-technological system." The later sections speculate about the future evolution of this system, argue that it will inevitably lead to the end of human freedom, call for a "revolution against technology," and attempt to indicate how that might be accomplished.


/just a thought

user-pic

Yet another reason why I've given up flying.

user-pic

"While it allows the security screeners - looking at the images in a separate room..."

Damn, and I was all ready to wink at the unlucky guy (or gal) that had to look at my moobs!

user-pic

@Ihaveasmartpuppy: Agreed...You stole my line. :)

user-pic

But can take a photo of what's on the screen? And what are consequences for health? Is it like x-ray?

user-pic

@deeness: They will probably insist on doing both.
@m1k3g: I'm with you. I wouldn't have believed it possible but they've actually given me a reason not to fly that's more convincing than the fact that the plane is thousands of feet in the air.

user-pic

@Juggernaut: It's not like you would like to live on a farm, with no shower. Technology gives a lot. Just don't abuse it, like everything else in life.

And if a person hates technology that much, move to some remote location. That's easy, I had a teacher with a house in the middle of nowhere, no water, no electricity. He actually enjoyed living like this. I would hate that.

user-pic

Holy shit, I didn't even think of kids until now.
This is serious people - you really want a TSA pervert seeing your children naked?

I am so, so, so very upset by this.

user-pic

I agree, stop flying. Its an outrageous invasion of privacy. What about children? Doesn't this classify as child pornography?

user-pic

@MPHinPgh: Until the moment Britney Spears or Paris Hilton goes through the scanner ;)

user-pic

@Victo: I'm sorry, but there hasn't been a computer built that can stand the raw, unadulterated nude form of Paris or the Britters yet. They'd explode in disgust. Or discover a new form of life, then explode.