While the other large fast food chains sue the City of New York to keep calorie information off their menus, Subway has gone ahead and complied with the New York City regulation. Dunkin’ Donuts, meanwhile, submitted a sample menu meant to “prove” that putting calorie info on its menu just couldn’t be done… and the NYC Health Department responded by having its own graphic designer redo the sign to prove that it could be done.
lawsuits
../../../..//2007/07/08/judge-roy-fancy-pants-pearson/
Judge Roy “Fancy Pants” Pearson is back! Fancy Pants recently lost a $54 million suit filed against his dry cleaner for a lost pair of pants. Now, Fancy Pants has filed papers asking the judge to reverse her verdict for failing to address his legal claims.
![Hybrid Mileage Claims Spur Lawsuit](../../../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/hybrid-lies.jpg?w=300&h=225&crop=1)
Hybrid Mileage Claims Spur Lawsuit
A California man shocked that his Honda Civic Hybrid’s gas efficiency didn’t match EPA estimates has decided to file a class action suit against Honda for false advertising. John True spent an extra $7,000 on the hybrid model after seeing advertisements that claimed average city fuel efficiency of 49 mpg. True was horrified to discover that after 6,000 miles of driving, he only averaged 32 mpg.
The lawsuit claims American Honda Motor Co. has misled consumers in its advertisements and on its Web site. The suit notes that while the Environmental Protection Agency and automobile window stickers say “mileage will vary,” some Honda advertisements read “mileage may vary.” That implies that it’s possible to get the mileage advertised, said William H. Anderson, a Washington, D.C., attorney for True.
![Vonage's $3.99 Retention Plan](../../../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/vonage-puppy-dog-face.jpg?w=300&h=225&crop=1)
Vonage's $3.99 Retention Plan
Vonage offers a $3.99 per month retention plan to customers who might jump ship to providers with more certain futures. The plan is meant to shore-up Vonage’s customer churn rate, especially as the internet telephony company struggles to stay alive amidst a patent dispute with Verizon. Vonage’s churn rate last quarter was 2.4%, high enough to spook investors or anyone considering a potential acquisition. A comment left by a self-avowed Vonage flack tries to put a positive spin on the offering:
![CA Judges Issues Opinions That Tmobile's Mandatory Arbitration Agreements Are "Unconscionable" And "Not Enforceable"](../../../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/tpunkt1.jpg?w=300&h=225&crop=1)
CA Judges Issues Opinions That Tmobile's Mandatory Arbitration Agreements Are "Unconscionable" And "Not Enforceable"
A California judge issued an opinion that Tmobile’s contract terms forcing customers to go into arbitration instead of being able to sue were, “unconscionable and therefore not enforceable,” reports BoingBoing.
../../../..//2007/06/28/michigan-woman-sues-starburst-for/
Michigan woman sues Starburst for $25,000+ for permanent personal injuries after biting into a Fruit Chew that she says pulled her jaw out of joint. Get bent, Starburst respectfully replies (VIDEO).
![How The Recording Industry Killed Itself](../../../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/ghettorecords1.jpg?w=250&h=165&crop=1)
How The Recording Industry Killed Itself
In the fall of 2003, the RIAA filed its first copyright-infringement lawsuits against file sharers. They’ve since sued more than 20,000 music fans. The RIAA maintains that the lawsuits are meant to spread the word that unauthorized downloading can have consequences. “It isn’t being done on a punitive basis,” says RIAA CEO Mitch Bainwol. But file-sharing isn’t going away — there was a 4.4 percent increase in the number of peer-to-peer users in 2006, with about a billion tracks downloaded illegally per month, according to research group BigChampagne.
![Sample Letter For Objecting To Lame BoA Settlement](../../../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/writingaletter2.jpg?w=240&h=180&crop=1)
Sample Letter For Objecting To Lame BoA Settlement
If you’re disgusted by the pitiful compensation proposed in the Bank of America privacy violation settlement, check out Hayden’s sample letter for inspiration for registering your objection.
../../../..//2007/06/28/heres-a-clever-way-to/
Here’s a clever way to get the RIAA to drop a groundless piracy lawsuit against you: demand that they provide actual proof.
![Proposed Settlement For BoA Selling Your Private Information: $200 Off Your Next Mortgage!](../../../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/bankofamericasettlement.jpg?w=300&h=225&crop=1)
Proposed Settlement For BoA Selling Your Private Information: $200 Off Your Next Mortgage!
The proposed settlement for a class action lawsuit against Bank of America that would affect everyone who has ever had a checking or savings account with them since 1995 is pathetic. In return for selling your private information without your knowledge, and depending on your account, you can get: $200 off your next mortgage with Bank of America! OR…
![U-Haul Has History Of Losing Key Evidence When Sued](../../../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/uhaultire.jpg?w=179&h=125&crop=1)
U-Haul Has History Of Losing Key Evidence When Sued
Central pieces of evidence have gone go missing when U-Haul gets sued, LAT reports in the 3rd part of its investigation into the do-it-yourself moving company. In 11 out of 10,000 lawsuits filed against the company since 1998, items such as faulty tires and rims at the core of the cases have vanished before or during trial.
![Taco Bell Employee Allegedly Spit, Urinated in Food](../../../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/tacobellsmall.jpg?w=200&h=222&crop=1)
Taco Bell Employee Allegedly Spit, Urinated in Food
A family from Sidney, Iowa has filed suit against the owners of a KFC/Taco Bell after they were served food that was allegedly contaminated by an employee. According to the lawsuit, the couple’s 4 year-old son became “violently ill” after being served food that had been contaminated by an employee who “maintained ‘special servings'” of food contaminated with urine and saliva so that it could be fed to unsuspecting police officers.
![Dry Cleaner Victorious In The Case Of The $54 Million Dollar Pants](../../../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/pearson.jpg?w=168&h=109&crop=1)
Dry Cleaner Victorious In The Case Of The $54 Million Dollar Pants
Judge Roy “Fancy Pants” Pearson is probably crying his poor, litigious little eyes out this morning. He’s lost his infamous $54 million lawsuit against a local DC dry cleaner. Pearson originally sought $65 million in damages after the cleaner allegedly gave him the wrong pants.
![Some Belkin Wireless Owners May Be Entitled To Full Refunds](../../../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/belkinhq.jpg?w=250&h=127&crop=1)
Some Belkin Wireless Owners May Be Entitled To Full Refunds
If you bought one of 37 Belkin wireless products between October 13, 2002 and February 5, 2007, you may be entitled to a full refund.
![Jury Awards Walmart Pharmacist $2 Million In Sex-Discrimination Suit](../../../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/walmartnight.jpg?w=200&h=141&crop=1)
Jury Awards Walmart Pharmacist $2 Million In Sex-Discrimination Suit
A Massachusetts jury has awarded a former Walmart employee almost $2 million dollars after finding that the company underpaid her, then fired her as a result of gender discrimination, according to Reuters.
“We respect the jury’s decision but we feel that it did not reflect the facts in the case, so we are studying the decision and have not ruled out an appeal,” said Wal-Mart spokesman John Simley, in a phone interview on Wednesday. “Ms. Haddad was dismissed because of numerous violations of company policy.”
![Judge To RIAA: Students Must Be Allowed To Respond To John Doe Lawsuits](../../../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/riaalogosmall.jpg?w=88&h=74&crop=1)
Judge To RIAA: Students Must Be Allowed To Respond To John Doe Lawsuits
The RIAA has argued that it would suffer irreparable harm unless immediate discovery was allowed, but Judge Garcia didn’t find that argument convincing. “While the Court does not dispute that infringement of a copyright results in harm, it requires a Coleridgian ‘suspension of disbelief’ to accept that the harm is irreparable, especially when monetary damages can cure any alleged violation,” wrote the judge. “On the other hand, the harm related to disclosure of confidential information in a student or faculty member’s Internet files can be equally harmful.”