In the months following the tragic Dec. 2, 2015 terrorist attack in San Bernardino, the FBI and Apple engaged in a heated legal (and publicity) battle over whether or not the tech giant could be compelled to unlock an iPhone belonging to one of the attackers. Then in March 2016, the FBI paid an unidentified third party to provide a solution this particular problem. The identity and actual cost of this unlocking is still unknown, but two of the country’s biggest media companies have sued the FBI to learn more. [More]
all writs act
![News Organizations Sue FBI To Find Out Who & How Much It Paid To Unlock Terrorist’s iPhone](../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/iphone5c1.jpg?w=300&h=225&crop=1)
News Organizations Sue FBI To Find Out Who & How Much It Paid To Unlock Terrorist’s iPhone
![photographybynatalia](../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/spyvsspy.png?w=300&h=225&crop=1)
Bill Requiring Security Backdoors On Phones & Other Devices Appears To Be DOA
Last month, Senators Diane Feinstein of California and Richard Burr of North Carolina were set to bring forth legislation that would end the debate on whether companies like Apple should help law enforcement unlock users’ devices, by requiring them to do so. In spite of the bipartisan, high-level sponsorship and the spotlight of the disputes between Apple and the Justice Department, it looks like this controversial legislation may never even be formally introduced. [More]
![William Hook](../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/iphone6plus.jpg?w=300&h=225&crop=1)
The End Is Just The Beginning In The Apple Vs. DOJ Legal Battle Over Encryption
As you may have heard, on Friday afternoon the U.S. Department of Justice backed off its efforts to compel Apple to aid in unlocking a criminal suspect’s iPhone — for the second time in only a few weeks. While some have heralded this as a significant victory for Apple (or at least as a loss for the government), it’s really just a tiny, unresolved spat in what looks to become a protracted legal battle for both sides. [More]
![ash](../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/judgesa.jpg?w=300&h=225&crop=1)
Did U.S. Use Secret Court To Force Tech Companies To Weaken Encryption?
Legislators in D.C. are currently considering a law that would compel tech companies to have weak device and software encryption so that law enforcement can snoop when necessary, while federal prosecutors have repeatedly used a 227-year-old law to try to force Apple and Google to work around existing security on their products. A new lawsuit seeks to find out if the government has also been using a highly secretive court to force tech companies to assist in breaking their own encryption. [More]
![Great Beyond](../../consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/googlelights.jpg?w=300&h=225&crop=1)
Government Has Used 1789 Law To Compel Apple & Google To Unlock More Than 63 Smartphones
The high-profile legal standoff between Apple and the FBI recently came to an end when the government unlocked a terrorist’s iPhone without Apple’s assistance, but new data confirms that this single showdown is just one of dozens of cases where the federal government has successfully used a more than 225-year-old law to compel Apple or Google to aid authorities in bypassing smartphone security measures. [More]