Reversing an earlier decision, Britain’s Lord Justice Robin Jacob has ruled that Pringles are, indeed, potato chips. The decision means Pringles parent Procter & Gamble will be stuck paying $160 million in back taxes. P&G had insisted that the chips lack enough “potatoness” to qualify as a potato-based product (and be taxed as such), but the Judge disagreed, leaving it to philosophers and nutritionists to determine what exactly qualifies as the “essence of potato.” We kind of feel for P&G on this one. We love that crunch, and the way they stack so neatly in the can, but if we want real potatoes, a Pringle isn’t likely to be our first choice.
Yes, Pringles Are Potato Chips
By consumerist.com June 1, 2009
- sugar cookies Just What We Needed: Another Holiday-Themed Dessert Pringles Flavor
- at least it isn't pumpkin spice Walgreens Is Selling Hot Dog Flavored Pringles For Some Reason
- the juice will be loose Procter & Gamble Is Planning To Ditch Its Duracell Battery Business
- what's in a name brand? Huy Fong Founder Doesn’t Regret Failing To Trademark “Sriracha”
- Sriracha Everything Taco Bell Testing Sriracha-Flavored Menu Items