I hate it when I’m eating a bunch of crackers and I look on the box and the serving size is like “3 crackers” and all the calories and nutrition info are based on this absurdly small number. So I was glad to turn over my bottle of Coke and see that they were including both a “Standard Serving” and a “This Package” label. On the left it shows how many calories and such are in a regular can. On the right it shows how much is in the bottle. It’s nice that there’s a comparison. It’s also nice that they’re not giving the nutrition info as if someone was going to drink from the bottle at two and a half different meals. Let’s see this spirit of packaging transparency leveraged across the entire food industry.
Coke Expands Nutrition Label To Actually Make Sense
By consumerist.com October 29, 2007
- by the numbers FDA’s New Nutrition Label Emphasizes Calories, Serving Size, Added Sugars
- new trition Those Updated Nutrition Labels On All Your Packaged Food Are Finally Happening
- what's in your beer? Beer Biggies Agree To List Calories, Carbs & (Maybe) Ingredients On Bottles
- how wheat it is... Lawsuit Accuses Cheez-It Of Falsely Advertising “Whole Grain” Crackers
- what's in a number? Nutrition Facts Labels Getting First Makeover In Twenty Years… Eventually