As Many As 1-in-3 Student Loans May Be Delinquent

Over the years, Consumerist has reported on student loans and the crippling impact their debt can have on recent graduates. But with rising tuition costs and financial aid opportunities becoming increasingly competitive it’s easy to see why student loans are a necessity for entering college. A new report claims that overall loan delinquency rates are declining, but a closer look at the numbers may reveal a problem that is much worse than previously believed.

The newest Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit highlights the fact that loan-payment delinquency rates are improving, but’s review of the data turns up some potentially frightening numbers

The FRBNY report [PDF] notes outstanding student loan balances increased to $1.08 trillion as of Dec. 31, representing an increase of $114 billion for 2013.

In fact, student loan debt has tripled from a decade ago; an unsurprising figure considering tuition continues to increase year after year. Today, 71% of students leave college with an average of $29,400 in student loan debt.

According to the report, nearly 11.5% of student loan balances are 90 or more days delinquent or in default, down from 17% in a 2012 study.

The student loan delinquency rate given in the Fed report is only slightly higher than the 9.5% reported for credit card delinquencies. However, can these two forms of debt be subject to an apples-to-apples comparison?

As the story points out, credit card debt is effectively owed by all cardholders at any given time. There are monthly minimums required by credit card companies, but that’s very different from monthly loan payments by student loan borrowers who are generally supposed to repay their debt according to a set schedule over the course of many years.

Additionally, many student loan borrowers are receiving funds from lenders for years before they are obligated to pay it off.

According to’s analysis of the data, nearly half of the $1.2 trillion of education debt that’s currently on the books belongs to students who are still in school, and thus not yet required to make payments.

So in reality, the total amount of loans delinquent by 90 or more days is about 23%, more than double what the report shows.

However, says the number doesn’t give a full picture of student loan repayment troubles, since the FRBNY report excludes information for loans that are less than 90-days delinquent.

Click for full-size  image.

Click for full-size image.

By using the report’s “New Delinquent Balances By Loan Type” graph (click image on the left for full-size), was able to conclude that an additional 5% of student loans are 30 or more days delinquent.

So, in total, nearly one-third of the $600 billion in student loans that are currently in repayment mode could be considered delinquent.

With such a high delinquency rate, it should come as no surprise that student loan debt has had a negative impact on borrowers’ credit scores.

Last year, FICO reported that “consumers opening student loans more recently are generally higher risk than those in older vintages…This greater debt and the challenging labor market for recent graduates will continue to cast a dark cloud over the industry.”

And FICO was right, the dark cloud has seeped its way into other economic areas.

Earlier this year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau reported that the housing market has already been affected by potential home owners student loan debts.

With mounting student loan debt there are fewer first time home buyers than in previous generations. The problem is magnetized by a new federal regulation that went into effect in January. The rule gives mortgage lenders broad legal protections as long as they do not approve loans for buyers whose total months debt exceeds 43% of their monthly gross income.

So, how did student loan delinquency get to this point and what can be done? theorizes that the problem stems from a combination of reasons.

First, at least one-third of all the loans that were made should not have been approved in the first place.

Second, the servicers’ goals are different from borrowers. When troubled loans require restructuring or modification, speculates that the servicers don’t take action because it would be in contrast to their investors’ needs.

Student-loan borrowers are suffering through substandard customer service, half-baked solutions that are crammed down their throats and one-sided contracts that limit their recourse. Their plight is real, the problem is growing and the need for action is urgent.

Last November, consumer advocated took a look at problems within the student loan industry. They eventually called for a complete overhaul which would provide better resources for comparing loan options and helping students and families understand the consequences of borrowing such large amounts.

While a solution for student loan debt delinquency doesn’t appear to be imminent, says a good starting point is to capture and properly analyze all pertinent data to show how truly bad the problem is.

Why the Student Loan Problem Is Even Worse Than You Think []

Read Comments3

Edit Your Comment

  1. CommonC3nts says:

    This will never stop unless they stop giving loans out for worthless majors.
    If you are in anything liberal arts, psychology, sociology, history, english, etc then you should not be able to get loans as you will not a job in your field that pays enough to pay them back.
    The government tracks which jobs are in-demand and what they pay on
    We should be using this data to screen student loan applicants.

    If you pick a not-in-demand major then you should not qualify for loans.

    They also need to repeal the bankruptcy law and allow people with student loans to get rid of them in bankruptcy. It was that law that makes it so companies will recklessly give out loans.
    They know students cant rid of them so they dont care if the student is not responsible enough to have a loan.

    • MathManv2point0 says:

      I’m with you on the idea of actually screening applicants instead of carte blanche approval. Some applicants based on major alone generally have lower incomes upon graduation. Actuaries determine risk profiles for insurance companies and other financial institutions so why not student loans?

      However, it is important to realize there is a difference between federal and private loans. Most education loans are issued by the government and just serviced by private companies (Sallie Mae, FedLoan, DirectLoan…etc)? I know a lot of these private companies offer private loans as well but for the public loans tax payers would then be carrying the burden for unpaid loans and any extra costs associated with screening applicants and approving or assigning interest rates based on risk. That means more taxes for us tax payers or a higher interest rate for borrowers, or both.

      Given that most loans are federal most of the costs would be passed on to us tax holders if those of us with student loans (myself included) could have the debt forgiven through bankruptcy.

      However, I agree with you, something definitely has to change. Part of the reason the whole housing market crisis occurred was because banks were giving loans in $ amounts to people who the banks should have known had a high risk profile and low chance of paying the bank back. Changing the student loan industry (federal and private) could help mitigate the risk of a student loan crisis/crash. We as a country already have enough debt to the rest of the world as it is. I could go into another tirade on that topic but I’ll reserve that for another time.

      Sorry for the rant, folks, but paying a stupid 6.8% on federal loans simply because I was a graduate student has really pissed me off since it had nothing to do with my choice of a major or risk profile. Any time this topic comes up I soapbox a bit too much.

      • CzarChasm says:

        The problem with student loans being forgiven in bankruptcy is that pretty much all college students would then be better off declaring bankruptcy the minute they get out of college, once again leaving the taxpayer on the hook. I’m not sure there is a really good answer, but I would guess there has to be something in between keeping them forever and forgiving them for everyone.