<![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies - Consumerist Comments]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies - Consumerist Comments]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> @MARY MARSALA WITH FRIES : No, they asked for your vote "IF YOU AGREE."
All that negativity for nothing ;)


LadyCarolineLamb

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> @magus_melchior:

Or c minor!

number six

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> You know, I'd vote for the blog if I could do it without voting for the commenters. This site got so flooded with shills, snobs and victim-haters over the last year that it almost seems silly to call it "the Consumerist" anymore. ...Just my $0.02, which unfortunately you asked for by asking for my vote. ;)

Mary Marsala with Fries

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> slew OF noms, I meant

LadyCarolineLamb

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> DONE DEAL, all voted!
Put Consumerist in for a slew on nominations...then it wouldn't process until I added nominations for at least 2 OTHER blogs, so I also voted for
Dark Roasted Blend www.darkroastedblend.com which is a PHENOMINAL photo blog, and then went blank so I threw Lifehacker a bone, too.
:)




LadyCarolineLamb

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> @CreativeLinks: It would be, except 190 of those comments aren't about the article -- they're just people calling each other racist. :(

CumaeanSibyl

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> Err, the 2008 "bloggies"???

Ben, do you really need that sort of Validation? Isn't like the fact that you post a story and they are 200 comments on it enough :)

CreativeLinks

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> Please don't beg Consumerist, it's so unbecoming

dalejo

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> mmm... E flat major.

magus_melchior

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> I just feel the need to let everyone know that my company web filter has categorized that site as "Sports".

(Same as skittles.com, btw, which is for the candy rather than the sport as far as I know.)

/useless information

bunnymen

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> "we think should at least have the honor of being nominated."

Shamelessly plugging the site for these self-congratulatory circle jerk awards is making Andy Warhol do somersaults in his grave.

C'mon, Ben.

Elviswasntmyhero

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> P.S. Still voted for "you" all over the place. If no one else votes for "Best African Weblog, you're in. I'm sure nobody knows how to type [Xhosa click click language].com into the form. ;)

MercuryPDX

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> Make sure to vote the site itself for it's own Best Designed category.

I'm actually turned off by the shotgun blast of categories they're collecting votes for. Also:

because of revision or removal, it's time to bid farewell to:

* Best British or Irish Weblog
[SNIP]

In exchange, these spiffy new categories take their place:

* Best African Weblog
[SNIP]

<MiNdBoGgLe>

MercuryPDX

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> Wow, you're right. Thats just awful. it looks like a middle schooler made it. You'd think a site like that would be a little more, I don't know, professional?
And it's not even fully Mac compatible.

homerjay

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> Who cares about awards! Your posts are what makes you my required lunchtime reading.

squidwatch

]]> <![CDATA[Nominate Consumerist For Bloggies]]> Geez, that's an ugly website.

Asvetic

]]>