<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing - Consumerist Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:44:38 EST]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:44:38 EST]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php#c1069657]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
amen to that panhandler</p> <p><a href="http://www.ohmpage.ca">Rajio</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rajio]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:242271:c1069657]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:44:38 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php#c1068241]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Reiterating my pipe dream for straight-up Charge-by-the-Pound Airline.  You weigh 300 pounds?  $300 please.  You also want the flying tincan to be stocked with whatever libations you might happen to desire?  Bring 'em yourself.  You weigh 300 pounds and bring 8 pints of Guiness?  $308, please.  Two pound carry-on?  $310.  Fifty pounds of Lane Bryant clothes?  $360.</p> <p><a href="http://panhandling.blogspot.com">Panhandler</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Panhandler]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:242271:c1068241]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Mar 2007 08:57:01 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php#c1066426]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1063341">KevinQ</a>: Spirit's prices always look good, until you add in the fees.  A $159 ticket goes to $220ish.  Why the taxes and fees are so much more expensive there than other airlines, I don't know.</p>
<p>
And as for RyanAir, cheap as hell, yes, unless you pack a 70lb bag thinking "Oh I'll just pay whatever having a heavy bag is; it can't be too much" and then are slammed for 135 euro when your ticket only cost 30 euro.</p> <p>suckonthat</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[suckonthat]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:242271:c1066426]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:40:53 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php#c1065913]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
To see what they'll do next, just check out RyanAir in Europe.</p>
<p>
They're even more bare bones and fee happy than this. But they're very cheap.</p> <p>br549</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[br549]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:242271:c1065913]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:44:58 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php#c1064530]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Hey, guess what, havign a plane keep all that luggage in the air costs money. Not everyone has the same amount of lugage. Do you propose people with no luggage pay the same as those with loads of luggage? That doesen't exactly seem fair.</p>
<p>
Oh, and guess what else; food and drink cost money. Are you proposing that the costs for them just be absorbed into ticket sales so that someone who doesn't drink anything has to effectively pay for some glutton's drinks? </p>
<p>
This move does a lot to reduce fares for those who travel light and consume little and makes everyone more directly responsible for their own consumption and usage.</p> <p><a href="http://www.ohmpage.ca">Rajio</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rajio]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:242271:c1064530]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:44:49 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php#c1063632]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1063367">formergr</a>: Agreed. The policy should be one checked and one carry-on free, and everything beyond is subject to a ruthlessly enforced surcharge. </p>
<p>
I also find it amusing that the editors and consumeristas freaked out a few months ago when United floated the possibility of additional, ala carte fare classes.</p> <p>cabinaero</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cabinaero]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:242271:c1063632]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:59:46 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php#c1063378]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Good!  More choice in the market.  I'd take a 40% cheaper fare when all I have is a carry on.  Let people who think they need two suitcases for a long weekend in the Hamptons pay extra for the privilege.</p> <p><a href="http://golfcount.wordpress.com">Pelagius</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pelagius]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:242271:c1063378]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:26:29 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php#c1063367]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Oh man, I understand charging for some of this stuff, but charging for even *one* checked bag is a bad, bad idea. Boarding a plane already takes too long because invariably a bunch of people try to carry on their entire life posessions including the kitchen sink and stuff it into the overhead bins. </p>
<p>
Then there's no room, so people have to shove towards the back to find some empty bins, and when there aren't any, swim back to the front against the flow of traffic in the aisles to gate-check the bag after pulling a hissy fit. </p> <p>formergr</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[formergr]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:242271:c1063367]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:25:28 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php#c1063341]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I don't know what their prices were like before, but I ran a quick check online.  I searched for a flight from Detroit to Cancun, Mexico, and then I ran a search for the same trip on Yahoo Travel.  The Yahoo flights (Northwest, Continental) started at $320, while the Spirit Air flight was $200.  Which is nearly 40% cheaper.</p>
<p>
Now, like I said, I don't know what their prices were like before, but they seem pretty good now.  And as long as the charges for extra amenities aren't outrageous (and I don't think these are), then I think it's a good deal.</p>
<p>
K</p> <p><a href="http://kevinq2000.livejournal.com">KevinQ</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[KevinQ]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:242271:c1063341]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:22:39 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php#c1063247]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I wont vouch for Spirit's honesty, but according to the email received </p>
<p>
"Spirit Airlines announced today it has lowered many fares up to 40% as part of a new approach that empowers customers with the ability to customize their travel experience. For more information on our revolutionary ULCC (Ultra Low Cost Carrier) model click here(http://www.spiritair.com/page.aspx?id=1)"</p>
<p>
The way i see it? now my $200 ticket should be $120, I need one bag each way so an extra $10 and I should save $70, prob. just wishful thinking though.</p> <p><a href="http://www.roadtrip48.com">FutureRoadie</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[FutureRoadie]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:242271:c1063247]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:07:03 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php#c1063244]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Ahh, the RyanAir model...</p>
<p>
What they need to do now is add in a no charge for baggage on the first leg, and a $50 for return.<br />
</p> <p><a href="http://nweaver.blogspot.com/">nweaver</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[nweaver]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:242271:c1063244]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:06:40 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php#c1063217]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Seatbelts are presumably still free?</p> <p>PTWhipplebang</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[PTWhipplebang]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:242271:c1063217]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:03:35 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Spirit Air To Charge Extra For Sneezing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/spirit-air/spirit-air-to-charge-extra-for-sneezing-242271.php#c1063208]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
At first I thought it said Sprint, not Spirit, so I was wondering how a cell phone carrier could charge for checked baggage.  I'm sure they'll find a way, though.</p> <p>B</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[B]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:242271:c1063208]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:02:21 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>