<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[CompUSA Invented 53 Week Year So Execs Could Cash Big Bonuses? - Consumerist Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:20:44 EST]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:20:44 EST]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/compusa/compusa-invented-53-week-year-so-execs-could-cash-big-bonuses-240112.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[CompUSA Invented 53 Week Year So Execs Could Cash Big Bonuses?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/compusa/compusa-invented-53-week-year-so-execs-could-cash-big-bonuses-240112.php#c1030114]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Speaking of the Golden Urinal - did anyone catch the Harvey Birdman episode where he defends the plastic surgeon and gets a partnership in the firm? That is one of my favorite episodies of all time...</p> <p>orielbean</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[orielbean]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:240112:c1030114]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:20:44 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[CompUSA Invented 53 Week Year So Execs Could Cash Big Bonuses?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/compusa/compusa-invented-53-week-year-so-execs-could-cash-big-bonuses-240112.php#c1028421]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Dontcha just wish you could invoke a plague of locusts, etc on their executive management?</p> <p>Front_Towards_Enemy</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Front_Towards_Enemy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:240112:c1028421]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:28:00 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[CompUSA Invented 53 Week Year So Execs Could Cash Big Bonuses?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/compusa/compusa-invented-53-week-year-so-execs-could-cash-big-bonuses-240112.php#c1027122]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Comments above are right, this isn't news nor unusual.</p> <p>bluebuilder</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluebuilder]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:240112:c1027122]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:44:07 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[CompUSA Invented 53 Week Year So Execs Could Cash Big Bonuses?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/compusa/compusa-invented-53-week-year-so-execs-could-cash-big-bonuses-240112.php#c1027058]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Seconding what Capnfive and Mikesfree have noted, this really isn't unusual.  I could see how a disgruntled worker (must be quite a few of those I imagine) who's not familiar with accounting conventions might not understand it, though.</p>
<p>
Starbucks and Ahold (Stop & Shop, Giant) are two other retail companies I can think of off the top of my head that do this.</p>
<p>
Generally speaking, Wall Street will adjust for the extra week to create a comparable year so that people can compare year-over-year sales properly.  They know that the extra week is there and account for it.</p>
<p>
See:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_week_calendar">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_week_calendar</a><br />
<a href="http://financial-education.com/2007/02/14/the-5253-week-fiscal-year/">http://financial-education.com/2007/02/14/the-5253-week-fi...</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.racesco.com">scottso</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[scottso]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:240112:c1027058]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:32:36 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[CompUSA Invented 53 Week Year So Execs Could Cash Big Bonuses?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/compusa/compusa-invented-53-week-year-so-execs-could-cash-big-bonuses-240112.php#c1026905]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Thats a pretty common thing.  It happens a lot in finance.</p> <p>mikesfree</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikesfree]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:240112:c1026905]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:09:40 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[CompUSA Invented 53 Week Year So Execs Could Cash Big Bonuses?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/compusa/compusa-invented-53-week-year-so-execs-could-cash-big-bonuses-240112.php#c1026818]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Well, good luck with the annual reports;  CompUSA hasn't been a registered company since early 2000.</p>
<p>
As far as a 53 week year... there isn't neccessarily anything sinister there.  Lots of public companies use "fiscal" years where each period will end of a Saturday.  That's the "4,5,4", like you discussed.</p>
<p>
Here's the problem: That also results in an even number of weeks every year.  52 weeks X 7 days  = 364 days per year.  For clarification, a full calendar year is 365 days.  That means every 6 (lets not forget leap year puts them an extra day behind) years, you'll lose a week... unless you take a 53 week year!</p> <p>capnfive</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[capnfive]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:240112:c1026818]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:58:34 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[CompUSA Invented 53 Week Year So Execs Could Cash Big Bonuses?]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/compusa/compusa-invented-53-week-year-so-execs-could-cash-big-bonuses-240112.php#c1026740]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Galactic-sized pay is why companies have to rape workers and customers hard to survive.  How is this news?  Sure, they took an extra week on the year, maybe got to make an easy sales target, and rake in an extra 1-10 million per exec, but really, that money would've kept those "under-performing high rent" stores open for maybe a year longer.  Better that they grab the bonuses and screw the workers out of jobs that'll buy Smack Ramen to feed their families, than have some other know-nothing yahoos come along and reap the cash rewards of cutting working men and women off at the knees later.</p>
<p>
Just another "golden urinal," move it along folks, nothing to see here...</p> <p>SexCpotatoes</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[SexCpotatoes]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:240112:c1026740]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:48:54 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>