<![CDATA[Cingular Arbitration Escape Script Addendum - Consumerist Comments]]> <![CDATA[Cingular Arbitration Escape Script Addendum - Consumerist Comments]]> <![CDATA[Cingular Arbitration Escape Script Addendum]]> Nope, sorry. Anything you are paying monthly subscription fees for in Cingular is grandfathered into AT&T and will not be altered. This does not apply to formerly free services (though as an AT&T rep, I haven't heard a peep about changing any of those, they're considered essential services now and our competition would slaughter us if we changed em) or pay per use services (the entire industry, in a single 30-day span, increased their text rates from $0.10 to $0.15)

Jobeleca

]]> <![CDATA[Cingular Arbitration Escape Script Addendum]]> Say, will there be a chance to get out of Cingular when they form everything back to AT&T wireless?


I'm pissed about that.

joryplummer

]]> <![CDATA[Cingular Arbitration Escape Script Addendum]]> Whoops, wrong thread. This was meant for the original thread.

MikeWas

]]> <![CDATA[Cingular Arbitration Escape Script Addendum]]> Oh, here's a link to the case:

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=11t...

MikeWas

]]> <![CDATA[Cingular Arbitration Escape Script Addendum]]> If you cite the Cunningham case as noted, the rep will know think you're making stuff up. A proper cite to Cunningham is this:

Cunningham v. Fleetwood Homes of Georgia, Inc., 253 F.3d
611 (11th Cir. 2001)

On the phone. here's how you'd say it:

"In Cunningham vs. Fleetwood Homes of Georgia, reported at page 611 of the third Federal Reporter, volume 253, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that arbitration clauses are material terms to a contract. Therefore, you are an idiot."

Well, you might not need to say the idiot part.

MikeWas

]]>