<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Consumerist Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:49:11 EST]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:49:11 EST]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
														
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[All-Day eBay Search Outage Frustrates Shoppers, Angers Sellers]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5410075/all+day-ebay-search-outage-frustrates-shoppers-angers-sellers#c17019394]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5410075/all+day-ebay-search-outage-frustrates-shoppers-angers-sellers#c17016065">scoobydoo</a>:</p>
<p>Yeah, try closer to 15%. Don't forget the bite that Paypal takes (owned by eBay) and the fact that Paypal is now the only choice for accepting payments.</p> <p><a href="http://">Tedsallis</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tedsallis]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5410075:c17019394]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:49:11 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ground Beef Gains Time-Travel Ability]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5410088/ground-beef-gains-time+travel-ability#c17019366]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>If memory serves, when an old Mac lost its clock battery or the PRAM was reset, the date would revert to August 1904. Mayhaps their labeling is done on a way old Mac? It would explain the use of Chicago typeface too.</p> <p><a href="n/a">Crim Law Geek</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crim Law Geek]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5410088:c17019366]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:35:18 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fewer Consumers Write Personal Checks, Fewer Retailers Accept Them]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409933/fewer-consumers-write-personal-checks-fewer-retailers-accept-them#c17019338]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>My mother still writes checks and thinks debit cards are unacceptable; checks are a point of pride.</P>
<P>My mother wirtes checks for almost every transaction. When I mentioned to her recently how convenient a debit card was, she went on a rant about checks.</P>
<P>The main basis of her rant was that her neighborhood gas station accepts her checks. The gas station has multiple signs indicating that no checks will be accepted. She is proud of the fact that according to the gas station only she and one other person are allowed to pay by check. This likely has something to do with her paying by check for over 20 years at the same gas station.</P>
<P>Also, she remarked about how great it was that she was able to keep a 100% accurate ledger by using checks. I tried to tell her that she can maintain a ledger the same way even if she uses a debit card. She doesn't seem to care, seeming to think that checks are still better. (In fact, I have seen people in the checkout line updating their ledger while paying with debit card, obviously not a foreign concept to people who keep ledgers.) Hoeever, she seems to think the idea that some stores (e.g. walmart) can process the check when it isn't filled out and give it back to her to use again, as a good thing. (Sounds like the stores are doing an ACH on the account instead of processing the check.) Still cannot convince her it is essentially the same thing, except *LESS* safe.</P>
<P>But I digress. I have written less than 100 checks my entire life. I have written two checks that were not for rent...</P> <p>Ickypoopy</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ickypoopy]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409933:c17019338]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:26:45 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Possible Class-Action Suit Alleges Xbox Bans Result Of Vast Redmond Conspiracy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409916/possible-class+action-suit-alleges-xbox-bans-result-of-vast-redmond-conspiracy#c17019320]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5409916/possible-class+action-suit-alleges-xbox-bans-result-of-vast-redmond-conspiracy#c17014454">dbshaw</a>: Until we hear of evidence that calling Microsoft about a banned console that was actually banned without mods of any kind and they respond in a manner that can be construed as refusing to assist, I don't think we can pass any judgment on that point.</p> <p>cluberti</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cluberti]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409916:c17019320]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:19:22 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Possible Class-Action Suit Alleges Xbox Bans Result Of Vast Redmond Conspiracy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409916/possible-class+action-suit-alleges-xbox-bans-result-of-vast-redmond-conspiracy#c17019318]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5409916/possible-class+action-suit-alleges-xbox-bans-result-of-vast-redmond-conspiracy#c17011026">Joeb5</a>: Because they can?</p> <p>cluberti</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cluberti]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409916:c17019318]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:16:12 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Possible Class-Action Suit Alleges Xbox Bans Result Of Vast Redmond Conspiracy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409916/possible-class+action-suit-alleges-xbox-bans-result-of-vast-redmond-conspiracy#c17019312]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5409916/possible-class+action-suit-alleges-xbox-bans-result-of-vast-redmond-conspiracy#c17010955">Joeb5</a>: I have a problem with this logic - I know Microsoft sells HDD upgrades (at ridiculous prices), so if you got banned for a HDD upgrade I sincerely doubt it was an official Microsoft hard drive.  As to banning if someone replaced an optical drive, I don't remember seeing a retail package for an optical drive replacement, hence meaning one would have to have purchased a non-Microsoft branded component or taken one from another XBox and replaced it, which would require violating the Live TOS by "modding" the XBox.  I feel for folks who got banned inadvertently with machines that have no mods (although I would suspect this is quite rare, I'm fairly certain it's still possible it happened) but I don't really feel for any of the other complaints.  Just because it's easy to do, or Microsoft "should have" replaced things like failing optical drives doesn't mean they can't ban you if you mod the device in any way, and if you've got to open it to do something expect Microsoft to see the replaced component as a MOD.</p> <p>cluberti</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[cluberti]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409916:c17019312]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:14:55 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Kodak: Your Camera Has A Beach Mode, So Don't Take It To The Beach]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409905/kodak-your-camera-has-a-beach-mode-so-dont-take-it-to-the-beach#c17019296]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5409905/kodak-your-camera-has-a-beach-mode-so-dont-take-it-to-the-beach#c17006549">mianne</a>: absolute classic</p> <p><a href="http://">wbabbit</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[wbabbit]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409905:c17019296]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:09:34 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fewer Consumers Write Personal Checks, Fewer Retailers Accept Them]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409933/fewer-consumers-write-personal-checks-fewer-retailers-accept-them#c17019274]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5409933/fewer-consumers-write-personal-checks-fewer-retailers-accept-them#c17015056">dragonwerx</a>: That 10% seems incredibly high.  If you figured out how to run everything through Paypal, those fees are still way lower (and they massively gouge prices on credit card fees).  At the 20% bounce rates that are floating around, that's a significantly higher cost.</p> <p><a href="http://">unpolloloco</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[unpolloloco]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409933:c17019274]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:01:56 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Possible Class-Action Suit Alleges Xbox Bans Result Of Vast Redmond Conspiracy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409916/possible-class+action-suit-alleges-xbox-bans-result-of-vast-redmond-conspiracy#c17019160]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>MS and all of the other software companies can take their EULA and get stuffed.  Some of them, according to EFF, are downright draconian.</p> <p>Antiks</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antiks]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409916:c17019160]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:31:17 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ground Beef Gains Time-Travel Ability]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5410088/ground-beef-gains-time+travel-ability#c17019158]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>No wonder there have been so many E. coli recalls for hamburger.</p> <p>Smorgasbord</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smorgasbord]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5410088:c17019158]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:30:42 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ground Beef Gains Time-Travel Ability]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5410088/ground-beef-gains-time+travel-ability#c17019144]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5410088/ground-beef-gains-time+travel-ability#c17014755">ludwigk</a>: YES. You are so correct.</p> <p><a href="http://t0ph.com/">t0ph</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[t0ph]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5410088:c17019144]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:24:14 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Ground Beef Gains Time-Travel Ability]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5410088/ground-beef-gains-time+travel-ability#c17019131]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5410088/ground-beef-gains-time+travel-ability#c17018188">GitEmSteveDave_HazEnvy</a>: Boyfriend is a butcher, and you're spot on.</p>
<p>Catch the ground at around 8-9 am, it's the best (if they actually put it out) since they cut in the morning and a lot of higher quality, mis-cut stuff works it's way in.</p>
<p>Also, even when ground comes in pre-ground, the plant may source from many companies and therefore many countries. Just put all of them on there, instead of tracking each individual shipment and printing labels for each.</p>
<p>Same with pretty much anything... look at your juice, for example. Usually says Product of the USA and Mexico, or even more countries.</p> <p>Wombatish</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wombatish]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5410088:c17019131]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:20:47 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Kodak: Your Camera Has A Beach Mode, So Don't Take It To The Beach]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409905/kodak-your-camera-has-a-beach-mode-so-dont-take-it-to-the-beach#c17019121]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5409905/kodak-your-camera-has-a-beach-mode-so-dont-take-it-to-the-beach#c17007888">WiglyWorm must cease and decist</a>: what are you talking about.  With the camera it has a feature for beach settings, but taking it to the beach and having sand get blown in the camera isn't necessarily what they had in mind for that feature.  Same goes with my example, a company's scratch-proof coating for an ipod has a (well their only) feature that let's you drop your ipod from about 15 - 20 feet, normal bumping, other minor scratching (ie keeping it in your pocket with your keys), but then someone decides to launch it off the top of a building and it goes through the coating.</p> <p><a href="n/a">The Marionette</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Marionette]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409905:c17019121]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:18:47 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Possible Class-Action Suit Alleges Xbox Bans Result Of Vast Redmond Conspiracy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409916/possible-class+action-suit-alleges-xbox-bans-result-of-vast-redmond-conspiracy#c17019107]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5409916/possible-class+action-suit-alleges-xbox-bans-result-of-vast-redmond-conspiracy#c17010794">liquidnumb</a>: I'm sure you glanced right over the part where i saying how it's wrong that ms banned the ones who were only upgrading/replacing parts and focused on the rest.  Nice way to read the comments.</p>
<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5409916/possible-class+action-suit-alleges-xbox-bans-result-of-vast-redmond-conspiracy#c17007777">LadyTL</a>: I know, that's why i said that they should've have banned the consoles that were upgrading/replacing parts.</p>
<p>(tip: reading a comment before replying tends to help)</p> <p><a href="n/a">The Marionette</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Marionette]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409916:c17019107]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:14:46 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[At Least The Prison Economy Is Flourishing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5410084/at-least-the-prison-economy-is-flourishing#c17019098]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5410084/at-least-the-prison-economy-is-flourishing#c17014377">dialmelo</a>: Significantly, the USA incarcerates its citizens at a rate 5 to 10 times higher than Canada and Western Europe.  That's right: if you're an American, you are FIVE to TEN times more likely to be sitting in jail right now than if you live in Canada.</p>
<p>So, yeah, given that our prison population is GIGANTIC compared to other First World countries, and almost all of those people are getting out one day, you'd think we'd take a very keen interest in prison conditions.  Like making sure prisoners don't come out feeling like they've been blatantly ripped off by profiteering suppliers.</p>
<p>But hey, as Americans, we're unaccountably proud of the hyper-violent, non-rehabilitative, isn't-rape-funny nature of our prisons.  It's certainly one of the least attractive elements of our national character.</p> <p>jaket</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[jaket]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5410084:c17019098]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:12:03 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Insurance Company Mails Out Postcards With SSNs]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5408902/insurance-company-mails-out-postcards-with-ssns#c17019095]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5408902/insurance-company-mails-out-postcards-with-ssns#c16979080">SacraBos</a>: "I have email addresses that have never ever existed ... They get spam delivered to them every single day as that address is sold, bought, and abuse continuously."</p>
<p>How does spam get "delivered" to a nonexistent address?</p>
<p>How would you know?</p> <p>MauriceCallidice</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[MauriceCallidice]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5408902:c17019095]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:10:52 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Federal Judge Rules Against Scrappy Mac Clone Manufacturer Psystar]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5407253/federal-judge-rules-against-scrappy-mac-clone-manufacturer-psystar#c17019045]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>Who says Apple isn't a monopoly?</p>
<p>If Microsoft declared that you had to buy a computer from them in order to get Windows, there would be a shit-storm.  Yet, Apple's been doing the same thing for years and no one seems to care.</p> <p>Kabukistar</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kabukistar]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5407253:c17019045]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:55:02 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Save The Earth And Your Yuppie Cred With Reusable Starbucks Cup]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409038/save-the-earth-and-your-yuppie-cred-with-reusable-starbucks-cup#c17019029]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>I just saw these minus the Starbucks logo at ROSS for $3.99. However I have the Starbucks one.</P> <p>brandmuffin</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[brandmuffin]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409038:c17019029]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:51:16 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fewer Consumers Write Personal Checks, Fewer Retailers Accept Them]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409933/fewer-consumers-write-personal-checks-fewer-retailers-accept-them#c17019011]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5409933/fewer-consumers-write-personal-checks-fewer-retailers-accept-them#c17018832">pittstonjoma</a>: I mostly get people who can't spell the name of the store I work at, at all. Sometimes I'm amazed at the creativity of their spelling. Guess it doesn't really matter though, since the bank seems to cash it just the same.</p> <p>TheKuudere</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheKuudere]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409933:c17019011]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:48:31 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Possible Class-Action Suit Alleges Xbox Bans Result Of Vast Redmond Conspiracy]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409916/possible-class+action-suit-alleges-xbox-bans-result-of-vast-redmond-conspiracy#c17018955]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<P>@<A href="http://consumerist.com/5409916/possible-class+action-suit-alleges-xbox-bans-result-of-vast-redmond-conspiracy#c17016223">SnoopyFish</A>: And so what? If your console is banned now, they corrupt your gamesaves.</P> <p><a href="http://">Dracoster</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dracoster]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409916:c17018955]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:32:01 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Kodak: Your Camera Has A Beach Mode, So Don't Take It To The Beach]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409905/kodak-your-camera-has-a-beach-mode-so-dont-take-it-to-the-beach#c17018925]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5409905/kodak-your-camera-has-a-beach-mode-so-dont-take-it-to-the-beach#c17006343">qwerty001984</a>: Weatherproof cameras really don't stack up for features and photo quality.  My girlfriend and I have been researching and we're actually considering buying two separate cameras -one for water and one for other situations.</p> <p>Seokso</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seokso]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409905:c17018925]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:22:12 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Kodak: Your Camera Has A Beach Mode, So Don't Take It To The Beach]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409905/kodak-your-camera-has-a-beach-mode-so-dont-take-it-to-the-beach#c17018902]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I've taken my Canon Powershot A710 everywhere and back with no case, bag, or any protection.  It's been to countless beach and boat trips, backpacked for months through the invasive dry season dust of SE Asia (parts are still stained orange), tumbled down ski slopes at -20C, been dropped, banged, and generally abused.  Besides a seriously scratched screen and an occasionally sticky lens cover, it still works great and I wouldn't trade it for the world.  I'll definitely be buying Canon again.</p> <p>Seokso</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seokso]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409905:c17018902]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:17:21 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[All-Day eBay Search Outage Frustrates Shoppers, Angers Sellers]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5410075/all+day-ebay-search-outage-frustrates-shoppers-angers-sellers#c17018901]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>That slot machine sucks down money.  You have to do like $4 a spin and keep jamming that button to keep the multiplier up for whenever to bonus appears.  I did win like $500 off it once though.</p> <p><a href="http://">outlulz</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[outlulz]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5410075:c17018901]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:17:06 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fewer Consumers Write Personal Checks, Fewer Retailers Accept Them]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5409933/fewer-consumers-write-personal-checks-fewer-retailers-accept-them#c17018832]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I work in two retail jobs, and we must be backward because a lot of people use checks. Granted, most of them are senior citizens, but still. I also am annoyed that they don't put the name of the store in and such. It's even more annoying when they forget to bring a pen. Really?</p> <p><a href="http://">pittstonjoma</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[pittstonjoma]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5409933:c17018832]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:02:13 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
																	
				
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[At Least The Prison Economy Is Flourishing]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5410084/at-least-the-prison-economy-is-flourishing#c17018818]]></link>
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>I can scan a letter I just got from a federal inmate I know that confirms this article!!!! He says when inmates ask for another inmate to do something for them they'll say 'come on man I'll give you a MACK!'</p> <p><a href="n/a">Lucky225</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucky225]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:5410084:c17018818]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:58:02 EST]]></pubDate>
		</item>
				</channel>
</rss>