<![CDATA[Consumerist: taking it seriously]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: taking it seriously]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/taking it seriously http://consumerist.com/tag/taking it seriously <![CDATA[ AIG's CEO Issues Statement About $343,000 Phoenix Seminar ]]> Bothered by news reports about another high-priced junket, AIG's CEO Edward M. Liddy issued a public statement to correct the innacuracies he saw. AIG Media Relations emailed it to us and wanted to make sure we shared it with our readers, and since we're all about sharing at The Consumerist, here it is:

Recent news reports have grossly mischaracterized an American International Group seminar for 150 independent financial planners held in Phoenix last week.

The financial planners are not AIG employees. In addition, the cost to AIG for this event was minimal. More than 90 percent of the costs were paid either by sponsors or by the independent financial planners themselves.

It is essential for AIG to conduct seminars of this kind to keep independent financial planners abreast of investment products and services including those offered by AIG. The financial planners are responsible for generating almost $200 million in revenue this year for AIG as of September 30th.

On October 10, I issued a directive to all AIG employees and subsidiaries to reduce expenses and conserve cash, including cancelling all nonessential conferences or meetings, unnecessary travel and excessive overhead. Since then, we have canceled more than 160 events. We conducted a top-to-bottom review of all expenses of the Phoenix meeting in advance and found that it was consistent with my October 10th directive. This conference was approved because it provides the kind of communication we must conduct with the people who sell our products if we are to be successful and repay the U.S. taxpayer.

PREVIOUSLY: AIG Spends $343,000 On Secret Seminar

]]>
Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:46:16 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5084175&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ AIG Spends $343,000 On Secret Seminar ]]> AIG is hurting so bad that we just gave them another $40 billion, while execs live it up at another luxury junket, this one costing $343,000. KNVX uncovered another high-priced conference taking place at the Pointe Hilton Squaw Peak Resort in Phoenix, AZ. They reported that AIG made efforts to disguise its presence, making sure no AIG iconography was out in the open. One hotel employee said that staff was forbidden from even saying the word AIG. AIG said seminars like this, which was for independent financial advisers who steer customers to AIG, are essential to its business. They also said that most of the seminar's costs would be picked up by other corporate sponsors. AIG said in a statement, "We take very seriously our commitment to aggressively manage meeting costs."

Another AIG Resort "Junket": Top Execs Caught on Tape [ABC] (Thanks to Andy!)

]]>
Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:12:40 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5083244&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ TSA Screener Helped Himself To $200,000 Worth Of Your Stuff ]]> Meet Pythias Brown. Until recently, he was a TSA screener at Newark airport, and if you're missing any pricey electronics, you might have Mr. Brown to thank for it. He's accused of stealing more than $200,000 worth of electronics, including a $47,000 camera from HBO. Oddly, it was CNN that helped bust the "one man crimewave" when an employee noticed some of their equipment being sold on eBay.

As you can see from the above screen grab, Mr. Brown, like so many other eBay thieves, practiced excellent customer service. His customers claimed to be "in love" with him, thanks to his prompt delivery and "good communication." One customer remarked that the camera he bought was missing its instructions. Guess the owner didn't pack them.

Mr. Brown's bail has been set at $100,000. He faces 10 years in prison if convicted. The TSA is reportedly taking the matter "seriously."


Bail set at $100,000 for airport baggage screener
[Newsday]
TSA agent helped himself to a $47,900 camera (and more!) [Gadling] (Thanks, Geoffrey!)

]]>
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:58:24 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5063212&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ GameStop Takes Buying And Selling Stolen Goods Seriously ]]> WHO: GameStop
WHAT:Authorities said today that eight current and former employees of the world's largest video game retailer have pleaded guilty to theft of property charges for buying video games purported to be stolen.
WHERE: GameStop employees nabbed in undercover sting [Commercial Appeal]
THE QUOTE: “GameStop takes this situation quite seriously,” said Rory Rhoads, GameStop’s Regional Vice President of Stores. “We are pleased to partner with the ALERT Unit and have taken very deliberate steps to improve our operations. Specifically, we have suspended our cash-for-trade transactions in Shelby County and DeSoto County, Mississippi until February 2009.”

(Photo: Marike79 )

]]>
Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:53:21 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5058053&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Vindictive Qwest Employee Slashes Six Phone Lines ]]> KTVZ in Redmond is reporting that a vindictive Qwest employee is running around slashing phone lines "to get back at" another technician. Six phone lines have already been cut, prompting Qwest to launch an investigation.
Janine Butler said, "This person could come into my home during the day, during the evening time. They could steal, rob, rape. We live in a scary time."

But this isn't just scary, she says - it's dangerous. Because they don't have cell phones, and her husband, Dave, is diabetic, she says her phone line is her lifeline.

"If he went into shock, he could die," she explained. "It is a life-threatening problem that we have without a phone."

Bob Gravely can't say if Qwest is looking at one particular person, but he did say they take any network disruption very seriously, and an investigation was under way immediately.

Stay alert, citizens! The Qwest slasher remains on the loose and is presumably armed with slashing tools. You or your phone line could be next!

Redmond couple told Qwest tech cut phone line [KTVZ] (Thanks to Geoffrey!)

]]>
Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:00:35 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5046489&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Minerals Management Service Take Pay-For-Offshore-Oil-Play Scandal "Extremely Seriously" ]]> WHO: Minerals Management Service
WHAT: A government agency in charge of issuing offshore drilling leases and collecting royalties was accused of getting payola in the form of sex, drugs, money, alcohol and gifts from oil and gas industry representatives.
WHERE: Oil brokers sex scandal may affect drilling debate [AP]
THE QUOTE: In an interview, MMS Director Randall Luthi said the agency took the report "extremely seriously"

(Thanks to everyone who sent this in!) (Photo: zncjmom)

]]>
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:47:50 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048464&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Palin Takes Protecting Polar Bears "Very Seriously" ]]> For the sake of balance, vis-à-vis Obama's Taking It Seriously, here's one for Sarah Palin.

WHO: Republican VP candidate Sarah Palin.
WHAT: In an op-ed, Palin, who favors opening ANWR to drilling and whose husband got a $46,790 paycheck last year from BP, laid out her reasons for why the Bush administration shouldn't have added polar bears to the endangered species list.
WHERE: "Bearing Up" [NYT Op-Ed]
THE QUOTE: "The state takes very seriously its job of protecting polar bears and their habitat..."
BONUS QUOTE: "If you are not for opening ANWR, in the state of Alaska, you couldn't get elected dogcatcher." - former Alaska state Rep. Ray Metcalfe in an AP article.

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies (and politicians) use over and over again to appear contrite or thoughtful without actually saying or doing anything. Our series of posts documenting the phrase's attempts recurrences are our attempt to question how much seriousness-taking is actually going on.

(Thanks to Michael Belisle!)

(Photo: noromdiam, Wikipedia)

]]>
Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:24:30 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5044256&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Most Verizon FIOS Installations Violate National Electric Standards ]]> A two-year investigation has concluded that most Verizon FIOS installations fail to meet national safety standards, and could cause fires or electrocutions. FIOS is famous for house fires, but New York's Public Service Commission first started its investigation back in 2006 after several inspectors discovered improperly grounded installations.

PSC staff said FiOS "may form an electrically conductive path" and could create an electrical hazard. PSC spokesman James Dean called the public safety risk "minimal - however, there is a potential risk."

Under a plan submitted to the PSC last month, Verizon would review all of its fiber-optic installations to ensure connections are properly grounded and correct violations.

The company also said it would issue credits of up to $20 to customers for installations after Aug. 18 unless it meets standards at least 95 percent of the time. The credits would "compensate such customers for the inconvenience of the inspection (and, where applicable, remediation) process," according to documents filed with the PSC.

Verizon added that they take the Public Service Commission's concerns "very seriously."

Verizon offers plan to inspect FiOS wiring [Albany Times Union]
Violations cited in LI FiOS installations [Newsday]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:00:32 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5043882&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Obama Took Hillary As VP "Very Seriously" ]]> I like to keep it pretty apolitical here at The Consumerist, but when Obama uttered the very same PR-double-speak phrase, "taking it seriously," that we've been skewering for eight months, I had to post it.

WHO: Barack Obama
WHAT: Shortly before the opening of the Democratic National Convention, Obama assured America that Hillary was always a viable candidate in his VP search.
WHERE: Obama Dismisses Worries About Clinton Fallout [New York Times]
THE QUOTE: "'I've tried not to have long discussions about short lists, long lists...But I’ve said publicly before and I will repeat again that Senator Clinton would be on anybody’s short list, so I took her very seriously."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies (and now, presidential candidates) use over and over again to appear contrite or thoughtful without actually saying or doing anything. Our series of posts documenting the phrase's attempts recurrences are our attempt to question how much seriousness-taking is actually going on.

(Thanks to Michael Belisle!)

(Photo: BohPhoto)

]]>
Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:16:30 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5041708&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Now In Applebee's Salads: Lizards! ]]> Applebee's served a four-inch dead lizard as part of a salad last week. The McLean County Health Department investigated the surprise garnish and found that while "management confirmed it did happen," "it’s just one of those extraordinary circumstances," and that the restaurant was not at fault.

Asked whether the health department thought the lizard came with the lettuce, or whether it was placed with the lettuce later, Davis said, “I don’t want to speculate or place blame.”

The health department has not fined or sanctioned the restaurant, Davis said. The sanitarian’s investigation revealed that nothing appeared out of the ordinary and that Applebee’s staff did nothing wrong, she said.

Employees showed how they wash the lettuce, cut it, then wash it again. “They couldn’t fathom how it (a lizard) got through the process…and they profusely apologized,” Davis said.

Applebee's officials promised that "the report was being taken very seriously."

Lizard reportedly found in salad at Applebee's [Pantagraph]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:00:04 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5034724&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dominick's Takes Its Fly Infested Grocery Store "Very Seriously" ]]> WHO: Dominick's Finer Foods
WHAT: A Dominick's Finer Foods grocery store on Chicago's Near West side has been closed by the Department of Public Health due to a massive fly infestation.
WHERE: Dominick's may reopen Friday afternoon pending reinspection, manager says [Chicago Tribune]
THE QUOTE: "We go to great lengths for sanitation, and we have some of the highest store standards in the food industry," [Dominick's spokesperson] Redmond said. "The issue with fruit flies has been addressed. We took it very seriously."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again to appear contrite without actually saying or doing anything. Our series of posts documenting recurrences of the phrase attempts to question how seriously they're actually taking it.

(Photo: stirwise )

]]>
Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:56:17 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5034806&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Walmart Takes Salmonella Peppers Very Seriously ]]> WHO: Walmart
WHAT: A man is suing Walmart for selling him salmonella-tainted peppers that got him sick.
WHERE: Man Sues Wal-Mart Over Tainted Peppers [Washington Post]
THE QUOTE: "Obviously, food safety is very important to us. It's a matter we take very seriously," said Walmart spokesperson Daphne Davis Moore . "We'll take a very close look at it."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again to appear contrite without actually saying or doing anything. Our series of posts documenting recurrences of the phrase attempts to question how much seriousness-taking is actually going on.

(Photo: lucianvenutian)

]]>
Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:51:52 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033957&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Papa John's Is Taking Your Theft Seriously, And Gets Offended If You Don't Believe Them ]]> Mark didn't like how a Papa John's pizza delivery guy was acting, so he paid the delivery charge but marked through the tip line on his receipt. Two days later, he discovered an extra $6.42 had been tacked on. When Mark called Papa John's to report the theft, he spoke to someone who obviously hasn't gotten our memo that "taking it seriously" is about as reassuring as "your call is very important to us."

Here's Mark's story:

On Monday, July 28th I ordered a pizza from Papa John's Pizza. When the delivery driver showed up, he handed me my Visa slip to sign with an 'x' written next to the tip line. To me calling any kind of attention to the tip line on a credit card slip is akin to holding your hand out and asking 'where's my tip.' I didn't like the presumptive tip, and had already paid an almost $2.00 “delivery charge” so I wrote a line through the tip line, rewrote the total and signed the slip.

This morning while getting ready for work, my wife informs me that Papa John's Pizza had overcharged us by $6.42. Quite upset about Papa John's Pizza stealing six-and-a-half dollars from me, I immediately googled Papa John's Pizza corporate number. I was transferred to the finance department, and left a message expressing my extreme dissatisfaction. About 7 minutes later I got a call back from Papa John's Pizza and the gentleman asked for the details of the transaction, etc. After promising the difference would be reversed to my debit card, he said that “Papa John's takes this sort of complaint seriously.” To which of course I replied “Please do not 'take this seriously,' resolve the issue.” Then the Papa John's Pizza guy got all defensive and wanted to know why I was calling him a liar. Anyway he promised to have a 'field supervisor' look into the situation.

If my charge was off by a dollar, say because the person keying in the charge transposed a number, I may or may not have been so upset. I would have waited until the local Papa John's Pizza opened up and discussed the matter with local management. But I firmly believe that the delivery driver took it upon himself to give himself a 30% tip. I also wonder how many other people have been 'fleeced' by this driver.

I hope to email you with an update about how Papa John's Pizza refunded the difference and took steps to show me that I am a valued customer, but the day is still young.

Well, we're impressed that someone at Papa John's called him back as promised, and in less than 10 minutes—that sort of thing is far too rare with many companies, and makes us think that Papa John's actually means the phrase. But yeah, they might want to rethink using empty PR-speak if they want to reassure customers that employee theft is not tolerated. But you shouldn't blame your customers for being skeptical when they hear that phrase—there's a reason nobody believes it anymore.

(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:42:42 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031500&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ McDonald's Takes Baking Metal Screws Into Their Apple Pies "Very Seriously" ]]> WHO: McDonald's
WHAT: A woman from Queens, NY took a bite of a McDonald's apple pie and found a metal screw inside.
WHERE: Screw this! Mom gets big Mac surprise as she chomps on apple pie [Daily News]
THE QUOTE: "Nothing is more important to me than the safety and well-being of my employees and customers," [McDonald's franchise holder Michael Giunta] said. "We take these matters very seriously."

]]>
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:59:58 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5029293&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Subway Takes Knife In Sandwich Very Seriously ]]> WHO: Subway
WHAT: A man says he ate a subway sandwich and it had a 7-inch serrated blade inside.
WHERE: NYC man says he found knife in Subway sandwich [AP] (Thanks to Jeff!)
THE QUOTE: "Subway restaurants spokesman Kevin Kane says food safety and customer comments are taken "very seriously" and that the company is "investigating the facts."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again in public statements whenever they have bad PR. Our series of posts on occurrences of the phrase is our attempt to question how seriously companies are really taking these matters if every time they trot out this phrase by rote.

(Photo: Morton Fox, Getty)

]]>
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:50:14 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025762&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ JPMorgan Chase Accidentally Breaks Into Your House And Steals Everything You Own ]]> Bobo and Joy Dickson bought a house had been headed for foreclosure, but JPMorgan Chase apparently didn't get the message that the former owners had moved out and the new owners were in residence. So, naturally, they hired a firm to drill the Dickson's locks and take everything they owned, including their food. Now JPMorgan Chase is "taking it seriously."

"We take this very seriously, and we are working with EMC [a mortgage company JPMorgan Chase owns] and the family's attorney to make this right," said Tom Kelly, a JPMorgan spokesman.

After the Dickson's bought the house back in May, the foreclosure proceedings were supposed to have been stopped. They weren't. That's when the former owner's mortgage company (owned by JPMorgan Chase) hired "Field Asset Services Inc." to drill the locks and "empty the house," according to the Austin American-Statesmen. Field Asset Services claims that the Dickson's possessions were given to area thrift stores, but they have been unable to locate them.

Ordinarily, when personal possessions are left in a foreclosed home a court order is needed to remove the items and the owners are given the opportunity to reclaim them within 24 hours. JPMorgan Chase says its not sure if there was a court order in this case.

Elizabeth Bradburn, the Dicksons' real estate agent, is organizing an effort to collect donations for the family. She said gift cards to furniture and household goods stores are preferred and may be sent to the Dicksons' business address: 9800 N. Lamar Blvd.,

No. 315, Austin TX 78753.

"It's been awesome to see people mobilize and want to help out," Hance [Dicksons' attorney] said. "The Dicksons are, of course, very grateful and touched by the outpouring of support from the community."

Cedar Park couple sues Austin company in foreclosure mix-up [American-Statesmen](Thanks, Ron!)

]]>
Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:56:37 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5021117&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ This Rejected Chiropractor Is "Sorry You Don't Take Your Health Seriously" ]]> The excellent blog, Passive Aggressive Notes has a submission from a reader who rejected his chiropractor. Clay decided not to go back after the doctor refused to show him his x-rays unless Clay attended a seminar about payment plans and treatment options. A few days later he got a note that said:

Dear Clay,

Thank you for taking the time to chat with my office staff the other day regarding your care here at [redacted] Chiropractic.

I am sorry that you do not take your health seriously. When you decide to make your health a priority, please know we are available to help you.

I urge you to take good care of your health and contact us immediately if you run into any problems. It's been a pleasure to be of service to you.

Oh, no! He's not taking it seriously!

Spinal Manipulation [Passive Aggressive Notes]

]]>
Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:38:35 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5019859&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Allen's Bribes Customers Who Find Dead Rat Heads In Their Italian Green Beans ]]> Texas wedding caterer Dale Cane found a dead rat's head in one of the twenty cans of Allen's Italian Green Beans he bought at Walmart. Allen's quickly offered Cane $200 if he agreed to keep quiet, and assured him that "the Pasteurization process renders the product sterile and completely safe for consumption." Even worse, this isn't the first time a dead rat's head popped up in a can of Allen's Green Beans...

Last year, a rat head surprised a Utah woman when she opened her can of Allen's Italian Green Beans. That rat head earned its finder, Marianne Watson, an offer of $100 if she agreed to sign a non-disclosure agreement, which she didn't.

Despite the bribes, Allen's has nothing but confidence in their canning process:

Dear Mr. (redacted)

We are aware of the recent allegations regarding our product. However, we can confirm that the details released by the media are not accurate. We have spoken with the gentleman making the allegations but as of this date, none of the allegations have been confirmed as fact. What we can tell you is that because green beans grow out-of-doors and must be harvested by mechanical pickers close to the ground, it is not uncommon that field debris, insects and field pests may be present in the product when it is harvested and delivered to our plant for processing. Realizing this, we have equipped our production lines to rigorously wash and inspect raw product a half dozen times. Before filling the cans, they are inverted and steam flushed to assure cleanliness. The product is then filled into the cans with liquid, capped and cooked to the level of Pasteurization right inside the hermetically sealed cans, rendering the complete contents of the can commercially sterile. We utilize extensive quality control measures including technologically advanced equipment and trained inspectors. Just a few of the processes we utilize are quality checkpoints including blowers, de-stoning equipment, high pressure washers, metal detection and technically sensitive equipment, which scans the product for color and texture variances, rejecting any off-color object. Our company exceeds all FDA Requirements for food processing. In addition, we are constantly exploring new processes to improve our quality.

Quite honestly, we are at a loss to explain how something like this could have escaped our quality control measures and could have gotten through the rigorous quality process and into a can of our product. We want to assure you that our plants are extremely clean and our processes quite thorough. Allens places strong emphasis on quality assurance, utilizing competent, well-trained people and the best equipment in our plants and Corporate Laboratory. Our company packs millions of cans of product each year and I want to assure you that an incident such as this is extremely rare.

Although we have not had a chance to fully investigate this matter nor hear back on the results from the independent laboratory, we do know and can confirm scientifically that had there been any foreign material inside of the can, due to the stringent cooking process, the complete contents of the can would have been commercially sterile and would not have posed any sort of health hazard or threat to the public. Again, the Pasteurization process renders the product sterile and completely safe for consumption. While it is our goal that our products be aesthetically pleasing to our Customers, incidents such as this pose no health hazard or risk. Obviously this is a raw commodity grown in a field and as such, is subject to exposures that occur within nature. The FDA governs our processes and recognizes that there is no measure within the canning industry to prevent incidents of foreign material from entering the product 100% of the time.

Thank you for taking the time to contact us regarding your concerns. We sincerely hope that you will give our Company another chance.

Sincerely,

Kathy Turner
Manager, Consumer Relations
Corporate Services Department
ALLENS, INC.
PO Box 250
Siloam Springs, AR 72761
kturner@allens.com

As for Walmart... well, according to spokesman Phillip Keene:

Food safety is a top priority at Wal-Mart. We take customer concerns seriously.

Man who found rat head in beans says canner told him contents of can would have been safe to consume [Beaumont Enterprise]
Utah Woman Also Finds Rat Head In Green Bean Can [KFDM]
(Photo: KFDM)

]]>
Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:30:46 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5018497&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Radio Shack Takes Selling Used Digital Recorder Containing Personal Information As New Seriously ]]> WHO: Radio Shack
WHAT: Sold as new a personal recorder full of the previous owner's intimate conversations and bank account information. Bonus points for blaming the original customer.
WHERE: Digital Recorder's Second Owner Learns Too Much About Another Family [ABC]
THE QUOTE: "RadioShack takes seriously its obligation to safeguard the privacy of our customers. In this isolated instance, our records indicate a customer returned a digital recording device and said it did not work. Unknown to us, it actually did work and apparently contained recordings of personal conversations the customer failed to erase from the memory before returning the product."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again in public statements whenever they have bad PR. Our series of posts on occurrences of the phrase is our attempt to question how seriously companies are really taking these matters if every time they trot out this phrase by rote.

(Thanks to Michael!)
(Photo: cmorran123)

]]>
Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:56:29 EDT Alex Chasick http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5012536&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Hewlett-Packard Takes Shipping Malware-Infested USB Sticks Very Seriously ]]> WHO: Hewlett-Packard
WHAT: A batch of USB keys for HP's line of ProLiant servers have been shipped infected with the worms W32.Fakerecy and W32.SillyFDC. Both can allow attackers to take over a system.
WHERE: HP ships USB sticks with malware [CNET] (Thanks to Jimbo!)
THE QUOTE: "HP takes all quality issues very seriously. Because the keys involved are used to install optional floppy-disk drives, this only affects the USB Floppy Drive Key kit which is a very low volume option and impacts a very small percentage of our ProLiant customer base. We've determined root cause and are fully confident that we have resolved this event. To date, no customers have reported this issue."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again in public statements whenever they have bad PR. Our series of posts on occurrences of the phrase is our attempt to question how seriously companies are really taking these matters if every time they trot out this phrase by rote.
(Photo: jblyberg)

]]>
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:50:31 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=378706&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Drugs In The Water No Big Deal, Says NYC Official ]]> fishinwater.jpgIn regards to a headline grabbing AP investigation that found the drinking water of major cities contained trace amounts of an array of pharmacopoeia, the deputy commissioner of New York City's Department of Environmental Protection, "A person would have to drink one million glasses of water to get the dose of even one over-the-counter ibuprofen tablet or the caffeine in one cup of coffee...Even at eight glasses of water per day, this would take the average person over 300 years to consume." So for those of you hoping to replace your medicine cabinet just by draining the Brita, sorry Charlie. However, there are no studies on the long-term effects to human of small exposure to a vast array of drugs, although, the Times notes, they have been shown to cause mutations in fish.

Council Considers Testing Water for Traces of Drugs [NYT]
PREVIOUSLY: AP: 41 Million Americans Drink Water Contaminated With Antibiotics, Anti-Convulsants, Mood Stabilizers, And Sex Hormones
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:43:21 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=377214&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Maryland's Dental HMO Security Breach Was One Of Nearly 40 In The State Since January ]]> con_sadmarylandcorrected2.jpg A few days ago we linked to a Baltimore Sun article that investigated the recent accidental release of private patient data online by The Dental Network. Now the reporter who broke the story, Liz F. Kay, has contacted us with news that "this was the largest of nearly 40 breaches affecting Maryland residents" since a disclosure law went into effect in January:
Thirty-nine businesses or groups have reported losses of sensitive information involving about 87,500 Maryland residents in the three months since a state law took effect requiring that people be informed of such incidents, records show.

The breaches have included everything from SSNs showing through envelope windows to deliberate attacks on databases by hackers. Luckily for Maryland residents, a state law ensures that you can place credit freezes with each of the three major reporting companies for $5 each.

Not a Marylander? Check this interactive map for a quick overview of what your state enforces by way of disclosure laws in the event your data is compromised.

"No sure bets in personal data security" [Baltimore Sun]

RELATED
"CareFirst Dental HMO Exposes SSNs, Says You Should "Take It Seriously""
CSO Maps State By State Data Breach Disclosure Laws

]]>
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:55:33 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=374386&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Were you affected by The Dental Network's ... ]]> con_tinysadmaryland.jpg Were you affected by The Dental Network's security breach in Maryland earlier this year? Last week we didn't have the address for the official "what to do now" website, but now we do: lds.thedentalnet.org. (Thanks to Liz!)

]]>
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:50:36 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=374392&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Air New Zealand Takes Fumigating Its Passengers Seriously ]]> WHO: Air New Zealand
WHAT: A flight returning from Fiji was blanketed with a thick fog of fumigants for five minutes because its biosecurity clearance had expired a few hours earlier. The fumigant caused a baby to gag and vomit, and left one man with a sore throat.
WHERE: Air NZ passengers fumigated [New Zealand Herald] (Thanks to Nicholas!)
THE QUOTE: "It's not like we don't take this seriously, which is why we had the [Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry] people come on board."

BONUS QUOTE: Spokeswoman Di Patton provided a refreshingly candid explanation before ruining everything with the driveling placation.

"But she said the airline did not consider it had made a mistake in terms of not having its biosecurity clearances before passengers boarded, saying "these kind of things happen".

"In this particular instance it was by one day the biosecurity clearance had expired - a few hours, in fact. It's not really a mistake. It's just happened as a result of other things."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again in public statements whenever they have bad PR. Our series of posts on occurrences of the phrase is our attempt to question how seriously companies are really taking these matters if every time they trot out this phrase by rote.

(Photo: planegeezer)

]]>
Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:13:58 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373861&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ CareFirst Dental HMO Exposes SSNs, Says <i>You</i> Should "Take It Seriously" ]]> con_dentalnetworkwebsite.jpg Last month, The Dental Network—a dental HMO owned by CareFirst BlueCross Blue Shield—discovered it had accidentally revealed personal data and Social Security numbers online for about 75,000 of its customers. It told the members about the screw-up three weeks later. "The company says that to its knowledge, no one has misused the information. But it says 'the risk ... should be taken seriously,'" and it's offering affected members one year of credit monitoring. After that, as you know, the thread of identity theft plummets. Wait, what?

Companies, is it really that expensive to offer 5 years, or 10 years, of credit monitoring to victims of your data security incompetence? Seriously, own up to your responsibility in exposing people to the risk of financial and credit problems and give them the tools they need to protect themselves. After all, it's your fault.

The Baltimore Sun, which first reported the breach, pushed The Dental Network for a reason why it took them three weeks to notify their members:

The company also created a Web site and phone line for members to learn more about the breach, which details the credit protections.

On the Web site, the company posted a list of frequently asked questions, including one about the delayed notification.

"Action was taken immediately and your personal data was secured within minutes of our learning of this accidental exposure," the response states. "With any such event, it takes time to gather the relevant information, identify the affected individuals, hold the necessary internal discussions, make the appropriate decisions and line up the assistance services that are being offered."

Here's another idea, as long as we're giving them out for free: why don't companies create contingency plans for accidents like this? You know, a formalized process that outlines step-by-step what should happen, so that action can be taken within, oh, 72 hours instead of 480 hours.

We searched their amateurish website (it explains a lot about the breach and the slow response) and can't find any mention of this special website or press release. If anyone has more information on either one, please send us a link or post it in the comments below.

Update: Here's the website for victims of the security breach: lds.thedentalnet.org (Thanks to the author of the original article, Liz F. Kay!)

"Patient data exposed online" [Baltimore Sun] (Thanks to Nick!)

]]>
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:21:01 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373484&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Facebook Takes Letting The Whole World See Your Private Photos Seriously ]]> WHO: Facebook
WHAT: A security lapse made it possible for unwelcome strangers to peruse personal photos posted on Facebook, circumventing a recent upgrade to the Web site's privacy controls, says the Associated Press
WHERE: Security lapse exposes Facebook photos [CNN]
THE QUOTE:"We take privacy very seriously and continue to make enhancements to the site," said a Facebook spokesperson.

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again in public statements whenever they have bad PR. Our series of posts on occurrences of the phrase is our attempt to question how seriously companies are really taking these matters if every time they trot out this phrase by rote. To see more examples of how companies are "taking it seriously" click here.

(Thanks, Kim!)

]]>
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:26:20 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372078&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways Pilot's Gun Fires During A Flight ]]> bangbangbang.jpgWHO: US Airways and the TSA
WHAT: A gun carried by a US Airways pilot accidentally discharged during a flight from Denver to Charlotte on Saturday, according to airline and federal officials. No one was injured, and the aircraft was not in any danger during the flight, officials said. The pilot had been approved by the TSA to carry the weapon.
WHERE:Pilot's gun goes off on US Airways flight [Charlotte Observer]
THE QUOTE:In a statement, the TSA said that the agency and "Federal Air Marshals Service take this matter seriously and it is receiving immediate attention."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again in public statements whenever they have bad PR. Our series of posts on occurrences of the phrase is our attempt to question how seriously companies are really taking these matters if every time they trot out this phrase by rote. To see more examples of how companies are "taking it seriously" click here.

(Photo:Flying Photog)

]]>
Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:55:07 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=371377&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ A woman says she found a strange white substance, ... ]]> A woman says she found a strange white substance, which police identified as crack, in her fish sandwich bought at Rally's. The fast food place says, "We take the matter very seriously, and are committed to the safety of our food and customers." [News12]

]]>
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:56:02 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=369910&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Walmart Takes Phallic "Fun Straws" Seriously ]]> WHO: Walmart
WHAT: A Kentucky mother was outraged that Walmart stocked phallus-shaped fun straws. When she called to complain, "they were very rude with me about it. They acted like I was lying, like I was making it all up. You know, I would never make something up like that, especially about my little girl. But, that's just how they treated me and it's just not right."
WHERE: Questionable Straw Shape Upsets Mother [WSAZ] (Thanks, Mark!)
THE QUOTE: "At Wal-Mart we take customer questions and concerns seriously. After being contacted on this matter, Wal-Mart pulled the product in question from our shelves and is investigating the claim. Of course, our customer is welcome to return the item for a refund, if they would like."
BONUS: WSAZ launched a classy investigation into the incident, which appears after the jump.

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again in public statements whenever they have bad PR. Our series of posts on occurrences of the phrase is our attempt to question how seriously companies are really taking these matters if every time they trot out this phrase by rote.

]]>
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:30:04 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368355&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ California Hospital Takes Botched Operations Seriously ]]> WHO: St. Joseph Hospital in Orange County.
WHAT: The California Department of Public Health is investigating St. Joseph for conducting three 'wrong site' operations since January 2006. Botched surgeries include operating on a patient's good knee and making an incision on the wrong side of a patient's head.
WHERE: Orange hospital under investigation for operating room error [L.A. Times]
THE QUOTE: "Members of the clinical team involved in these cases have been deeply affected, and as a hospital we take this very seriously and regret that it happened," [Dr. Raymond Casciari, St. Joseph's chief medical officer] said.

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again in public statements whenever they have bad PR. Our series of posts on occurrences of the phrase is our attempt to question how seriously companies are really taking these matters if every time they trot out this phrase by rote.

(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:43:30 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368325&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Go-Cart Track Takes Scalped Customer's Safety Very Seriously ]]> gokartscalped.jpgWHO: A Utah Go-Cart track
WHAT: A woman's long hair got tangled in the moving parts of a go-cart and her hair, scalp, and ear were ripped from her head.
WHERE: WDEF
THE QUOTE: "The owner of the go-cart track says... this was an extremely unfortunate accident that he feels horrible about...He also said the company takes safety of its customers very seriously."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again in public statements whenever they have bad PR. Our series of posts on occurrences of the phrase is our attempt to question how seriously companies are really taking these matters if every time they trot out this phrase by rote.

(Thanks to David!) (Image: CNN)

]]>
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:56:06 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367716&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Southwest Airlines Takes Flying Unsafe Planes Seriously ]]> WHO: Southwest Airlines
WHAT: FAA sought $10.2 million in civil damages from Southwest Airlines for neglecting to inspect the fuselages of 46 of its planes.
WHERE: Reader Ben K says: "I got the email below from Southwest regarding the recent news of the FAA fines, and immediately thought of your "taking it seriously" posts. The subject line of the message was actually 'Southwest Airlines: We take Safety Seriously'"
THE QUOTE:

Dear Rapid Rewards Member:

Southwest Airlines: We take Safety Seriously

You may have heard that Southwest Airlines was fined by the FAA regarding recent aircraft inspections. First and foremost, we want to assure you this was never and is not a safety of flight issue.
From our inception, Southwest Airlines has maintained a rigorous Culture of Safety—and has maintained that same dedication for more than 37 years...

(Photo:ZonaPhoto)

]]>
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:18:56 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=366106&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ More On The Pharmaceutical Contamination Of Drinking Water ]]> Here's a clip from Good Morning America on the contamination of drinking water from pharmaceuticals. Scary!

Good Morning America

]]>
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:40:42 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=366001&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ AP: 41 Million Americans Drink Water Contaminated With Antibiotics, Anti-Convulsants, Mood Stabilizers, And Sex Hormones ]]> AntiAntibiotics%20Kitty%20Can%20Has%20Mood%20Swings.jpgA soup of pharmaceutical waste spews from the faucets supplying drinking water to 41 million Americans, according to a disturbing study from the Associated Press. At least 24 major cities are affected, including New York, Washington, Boston Chicago, and Los Angeles.
Here are some of the key test results obtained by the AP:

  • Officials in Philadelphia said testing there discovered 56 pharmaceuticals or byproducts in treated drinking water, including medicines for pain, infection, high cholesterol, asthma, epilepsy, mental illness and heart problems. Sixty-three pharmaceuticals or byproducts were found in the city's watersheds.
  • Anti-epileptic and anti-anxiety medications were detected in a portion of the treated drinking water for 18.5 million people in Southern California.
  • Researchers at the U.S. Geological Survey analyzed a Passaic Valley Water Commission drinking water treatment plant, which serves 850,000 people in Northern New Jersey, and found a metabolized angina medicine and the mood-stabilizing carbamazepine in drinking water.
  • A sex hormone was detected in San Francisco's drinking water.
  • The drinking water for Washington, D.C., and surrounding areas tested positive for six pharmaceuticals.
  • Three medications, including an antibiotic, were found in drinking water supplied to Tucson, Ariz.

The situation is undoubtedly worse than suggested by the positive test results in the major population centers documented by the AP.

What Exactly Is In My Drinking Water?
Drugs. Lots of drugs. Trace amounts of the prescriptions we take and the steroids we inject into cattle are winding their way into our water supply. When we (or our eventual steak dinner) can't fully metabolize a pharmaceutical, it passes straight through us, past treatment plans, and back into the ground until we (or our cow friend) drink it up. Detected drugs include: "antibiotics, anti-convulsants, mood stabilizers and sex hormones."

Ok, Drinking Water Is Bad. I Can Switch To Bottled Water, Right?
No. Bottled water is drinking water suspended in a wasteful plastic shell. Like municipalities, water bottlers don't test for pharmaceuticals. Home filtration systems are equally useless against drugs.

Um, Ok. There Is No Escape. Am I Safe?
Eh, maybe. Scientists aren't exactly sure, but the research isn't encouraging. Pharmaceuticals, unlike general pollutants, are specifically designed to futz with the human body. "...recent studies—which have gone virtually unnoticed by the general public—have found alarming effects on human cells and wildlife." 'Alarming effects' means that cancers grow faster, kidney cells stop regenerating, and heart cells become cranky and inflamed.

This Sucks. What Is The Government Doing?
Ah yes, the government. Maybe they can offer an encouraging and meaningful response? Let's turn for reassurance to Benjamin Grumbles, the EPA's assistant administrator for water:

"We recognize it is a growing concern and we're taking it very seriously."
@#$%!

AP Probe Finds Drugs in Drinking Water [ABC]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:15:52 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=365629&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Showtime Takes Annoying Ads During Movies Seriously ]]> WHO: Showtime
WHAT: Showtime is promoting the upcoming shows by playing banner ads during movies that you paid to watch.
WHERE: Customer Service email
THE QUOTE: "While some viewers may be displeased with this tactic, we have found that a number of our subscribers appreciate learning about the premiere of a series in such a manner. Nevertheless, please note that we take your comments very seriously and have forwarded your concerns to the appropriate people. Thank you for writing to us."

]]>
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:25:57 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=364807&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ TSA Takes "Rights Of Traveling Public" "Very Seriously" ]]> WHO: The TSA
WHAT: A lawyer responds in general to some of the comments they've seen pop up on their blog.
WHERE: The "Evolution of Security" TSA blog
THE QUOTE: "TSA takes the rights of the traveling public very seriously, and in implementing security screening measures, carefully weighs the intrusiveness of those measures against the need to prevent terrorist attacks involving aircraft. Balancing the same considerations, the courts have long approved searches of airline passengers and their bags for weapons and explosives as constitutionally permissible under what is now commonly referred to as the "administrative search" or "special needs" exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement." (emphasis added)

(Photo: nedrichards)

]]>
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:00:00 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=360763&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ U.S. Agriculture Secretary Takes Hitting Sick Cows With Forklifts Seriously ]]> takenseriouslycow.jpg WHO: U.S. Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer
WHAT: Undercover video taken by animal rights activists shows cows too ill to walk being lifted and prodded into the slaughter box with forklifts. Sick cows are not supposed to enter the food supply because they carried increased risk of mad cow disease. The activity in the video went on while USDA inspectors were supposedly supervising the facility. The meatpacking company in question produces beef for use in public school lunches.
WHERE:California plant accused of torturing unfit cows [Reuters]
THE QUOTE:"First of all, this issue is taken very seriously by the USDA employees responsible for this area," he told reporters. "Obviously, there is a full investigation and inspection going on today."

]]>
Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:18:47 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=354427&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ $7 Million Lawsuit: Combining Crocs And Escalators May Result In Mangled Feet ]]> crocsandescalators.jpgBack in September we wrote about the hazards of wearing the popular "Croc" clogs on escalators, a combination that may have produced more than a few injuries all around the world. We heard about at least one case where the child's toes were ripped off when the shoe was sucked down into the escalator.

Now a family from Westchester has filed a lawsuit that claims that their child was "severely and permanently" injured in November 2007, when her Croc got caught in a escalator at JFK airport.

From the NY Daily News:

"The skin was peeled off her toe," lawyer Andrew Laskin said. "It's a pretty horrifying injury. And it's also horrible for a parent to witness your child injured in this way and suffering."
Crocs has so far chosen not to put a warning label on the shoes. Here's what they told one foreign news agency that did a report about Crocs:
"Crocs shoes are completely safe. The popularity of our shoes has helped draw attention to a long-existing issue that we think is very important—escalator safety"
Today, little has changed. Croc's says they're taking escalator safety seriously:
"Escalator safety is an issue we take very seriously, and we are looking into this report."

The Daily News asked the CPSC how many of Croc-related foot manglings they were aware of, but that agency "could not immediately say" how many reports it had.

Suit: Crocs shoe led to 3-year-old girl's toe accident on JFK escalator [Daily News]
Can Crocs Be Dangerous To Your Child? [City News]

]]>
Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:10:04 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=354101&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Woman Finds Thumbtack In Snack Wrap, McDonald's "Takes It Very Seriously" ]]> ronaldisfullofhotair.jpgWHO: Stephani Ann Carpenter was finishing off the last bite of her snack wrap when she bit into something hard that pierced her tongue.
WHAT: Stephani had bitten into a thumbtack. Sheriffs investigated and determined that the tack had probably fallen from a cork board that was located above where the snack wraps were made.
WHERE: Port Charlotte woman: pin in McDonald's snack [Herald Tribune] (Thanks, Cory!)
THE QUOTE: "Nothing is more important than the safety of our customers," said Paul Van Sickle, director of operations for McDonald's Florida Region. "This was an isolated incident which we take very seriously. We always strive to give our customers an enjoyable and pleasant restaurant experience in a clean and safe environment."

(Photo:Marike79)

]]>
Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:45:26 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=350573&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ UnitedHealth Takes Potential $1.3 Billion Fine Seriously ]]> unitedhealth.jpgWHO: UnitedHealth Group, an heath insurance provider.
WHAT: An investigation by the California Department of Insurance found evidence of 133,000 violations of state laws and regulations regarding payments for medical care.
WHERE:Health plan faces fines of $1.33 billion [LA Times]
THE QUOTE:""Our integration issues and challenges shouldn't affect our providers, and they shouldn't affect our members," he said. "We're very regretful about that."

At the same time, UnitedHealth executives downplayed the effect on members and patient care, characterizing the problems largely as administrative errors. Still, they said, the company was taking the allegations seriously."

]]>
Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:19:00 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=350303&view=rss&microfeed=true