<![CDATA[Consumerist: Subway]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Subway]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/subway http://consumerist.com/tag/subway <![CDATA[ This Subway Is Going To Reject Your Coupon One Way Or Another ]]> Dale couldn't redeem his "free 6 inch sub" coupon at his local Subway. Was it because of a particularly lazy employee, poor management, or dire financial straits? Maybe it was all three, considering the string of completely unrelated excuses Dale was given over just a few minutes.

I was reading your article about how some Subways were instituting a $0.75 refill policy when I remembered that I had a Scrabble peice that said I had won a free 'Any Reg. 6" Fresh Fit OR Reg. 6" Sub.'

So, I decided to head down to the Subway in Kansas City, MO (it's walking distance away from me) and tried to redeem my coupon.

Upon walking in, the Zombie-Employee told me that they were out of half of their ingredients. I found this odd, seeing as it was 6:30 at night on a Friday, but none of the items listed were what I was going to get on my sandwich anyways. I ordered a 6" Meatball sub (considered a "Reg. Sub", I'm assuming) and a Sweet Onion Terriaki 6" (that way, I get a footlong for about half the price).

I went to check out and showed my coupon. She replied "Um, sorry, this only works for your next order." This struck me as odd, seeing as the last time I ordered and got the coupon was over a week ago.

I informed the employee politely and she responded with "Well, we still can't take it. It only works certain times of the day." I pointed out to her that the coupon read "GOOD ON NEXT ORDER. NO SUBSTITUTES. MAY NOT BE COMBINED WITH ANY OTHER OFFERS. EXPIRES 10/13/08" and wanted her to point on where on that tiny piece of paper that it says it has to be certain times of the day.

The lady gave up, and confessed that she can't redeem it because there has to be a manager there to redeem their own coupon.

I didn't want to argue with her anymore so I walked off paying twice what I wanted to. I mean, I know it's only like $4, but it still irks me that they aren't able to redeem their coupons at anytime. I just wanted to put the word out that these things are pretty much useless since they aren't honoring them. First the refill and now this? Things must be going rough for them, eh?

(Photo: Mags D)

]]>
Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:06:55 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5052640&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Subway Institutes $0.75 Refill Honor System? ]]> Jon from NJ says describes his local Subway's new 75 cent refill policy as "silly." Hmmm.

Guess the glory days of free refills are slipping through our fingers...

]]>
Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:51:46 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5052351&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Which Restaurants Are Making Your Kids Fat? ]]> Unless your kid is named Hansel, he probably doesn't need to be fattened up like a juicy Christmas goose every time you go out to eat. That's not what some of the biggest restaurants think, though: Chili's has a kids' meal that comes in at 1,020 calories, while Burger King and KFC both offer meals that are over 900 calories. Your healthiest option, says the Center for Science in the Public Interest, is Subway. Here are what some other restaurants are offering, as well as tips on how to make the best of a bad meal when your kid is eating out.

For children between 4 and 8 years of age, the recommended amount of calories per meal, assuming three meals a day, is 430. If the child is active, the amount goes up to 565. Using these numbers as a guide, the CSPI looked at the biggest restaurant chains in the country, then whittled their list down to the ones that offer dedicated kids' menus and provide nutritional info. This meant the following were left out of the study because they won't provide nutritional info:

    We don't need no stinkin' nutrition
  • Applebee's
  • T.G.I. Friday's
  • Outback Steakhouse
  • Olive Garden
  • Red Lobster
  • IHOP

Here's what the CSPI has to say about those restaurants that do provide nutritional info:

Chili's has 700 possible kids’ meal combinations, but 658, or 94 percent, of those are too high in calories, including one comprised of country-fried chicken crispers, cinnamon apples, and chocolate milk (1,020 calories) and another comprised of cheese pizza, homestyle fries, and lemonade (1,000 calories).

Burger King has a “Big Kids” meal with a double cheeseburger, fries, and chocolate milk (910 calories)

Sonic has a “Wacky Pack” with 830 calories worth of grilled cheese, fries, and a slushie.

KFC has a wide variety of side items, but there are few meal combinations that keep a reasonable ceiling on calories, according to the study. One example of a high-cal combo KFC kid’s meal (the chain calls them “Laptop Meals”) has popcorn chicken, baked beans, biscuit, Teddy Grahams, and fruit punch, which has 940 calories. (KFC has since dropped Baked Cheetos from its kids’ meals, and some outlets vary the number of chicken strips or sides.)

Most of the kids’meals (93 percent) at McDonald’s and Wendy’s are too high in calories, as are the possibilities at Burger King (92 percent), Dairy Queen (89 percent), Arby’s (69 percent), and Denny’s (60 percent—though its kids’ meals don’t include drinks). (Since CSPI’s study was completed, Burger King has introduced one new children’s meal with macaroni and cheese, apple “fries,” and 1 percent milk, which has a reasonable 420 calories.)

Subway’s kids’ meals came out on top. Only a third of its Fresh Fit for Kids meals, which include a mini-sub, juice box, and one of several healthful side items (apple slices, raisins, or yogurt), exceed the 430-calorie threshold. Subway is the only chain that doesn’t offer soft drinks with kids’ meals.

So how do you improve the nutrition of your kid's meal the next time you eat at a restaurant? A spokeswoman for the American Dietetic Association gave the following advice:

"Don't be too alarmed even when [studies] come out and seem hopeless," said Dawn Jackson Blatner, an American Dietetic Ass>ociation spokeswoman. "With a few swaps and switches, people really can make healthier choices at these fast-food joints, especially when the decisions are made before going in.

"Many of these restaurants have the nutrition information online that you can print out and go over with your kids even before you go, so that everybody is on the same page before they pull up to the drive-through or [head] to the counter," Blatner said.

She also suggested that "instead of getting the fries, go with the apple slices. Many [restaurants] offer carrot sticks or apple slices or no-sugar-added applesauce or oranges, which make a big difference over deep-fried fries."

And pay attention to how food is cooked. "Instead of the deep-fried nuggets, go for something like the grilled chicken, and you will save fat grams and calories," Blatner said. You'll also save calories by switching the soda, she added: "You can't go wrong with unsweetened iced tea, water or a skim milk."

As for the restaurants that refuse to provide nutritional info, maybe you should just eat elsewhere.

Click here for some specific replacement suggestions from the Chicago Tribune.

You can download a copy of the full CSPI report here.
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:39:10 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033531&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 15 Victims Of The Grocery Shrink Ray ]]> The Grocery Shrink Ray continues its miniature spree across the supermarket aisles of America. Here's 14 more victims that have surfaced in the past week, as spotted by our watchful bands of deputized Consumerist reader-investigators...

Click on the pictures to start an awesome gallery

 Pat says, "My husband works long shifts overnight at our local air force base and he loves to eat Nature Valley chewy trail mix bars. I had just heard your interview on NPR when I went to Sam’s Club to the weekly supplies for his lunch and low and behold, they shrunk the granola bars. The box costs $8.28, which was reasonable for 35 bars LAST WEEK but THIS WEEK for the same $8.28 the box had shrunk and it contains 30 bars. My husband says that is a 17% increase in price per unit. Don’t know about the math but it is much less for the money. I have attached a picture depicting last week’s trailmix and this week’s trailmix."  Joe writes: "At our BiLo Supermarket in Blk Mtn, NC, I'd been purchasing their 1 lb bag 44596 12725 For $9.99. When buying it again a week ago, I saw only one of that size bag in front of 3/4 lb bags. Since buying that last one then, this week I checked there and sure enough that price is the same for the now 25% smaller bags." Case writes:"The Grocery Shrink Ray has targeted my beloved Monster Energy! It's not right, I tell you! For YEARS, Monster has come in 16oz cans. Now they are robbing me of a whole ounce of hypertension and diabetes-inducing goodness! NOOOOOO! This on top of the fact that the average price per can at the gas station has gone from $2 to $3 over the last couple of years. Is nothing sacred?!?"
 Jeff writes, "Delallo Red Wine Vinegar old package 32oz, new bottle 25.4oz and still being sold for the same price of $2.79."  Scott writes, "While on vacation in Tennessee this week with my partner we stopped to enjoy some breathtaking views of the Smoky Mountains. After having our breath taken away we decided to each get a bottle of water. The nearby Coke vending machine advertised 12oz cans of Coca-Cola brand sodas or a 12oz bottle of Dasani water for only $1. Not a bad deal for vending machines these days. I went first, put in my $1 bill, pressed the button for the Dasani water & out came a 10.1 oz Dasani bottle (see photo). Grrrrrr. Severely displeased, my partner decided to call the customer service number on the machine. To our surprise, the customer service rep was courteous, apologetic, said that this should not be happening & that someone would be sent to correct the situation (she asked us to provide her with the identifying information off of the machine). After all of that, she took our information & will be sending us a refund for the $1 we paid (without us even asking for the refund). So, we went from unhappy to satisfied in under two minutes. Yay(?)"  Sean writes, "So I was browsing Target to get some more trash bags, and I stumbled upon my favorite brand’s new box. It looks like they have a new scented version out. And apparently this new scented coating must be really thick, cause they took 6 bags out of the same size box, and they want to charge me the same price. I guess with everything else shrinking, Hefty must think were generating less trash as well. Needless to say I’m buying the box with more bags in it."
Christopher writes, "I'm a frequent eater at the Subway located at Mendenhall and Winchester in SE Memphis as it's near my office and comparatively healthy to the other nearby options. My regular sandwich is either a 6" Roast Beef or Turkey on their honey oat bread. I went in this afternoon for a Roast Beef, and the preparer (food jockey?) only put 3 slices of Roast Beef on the sandwich. I noticed that the lady in front of my had a footlong Turkey and only got 6 slices. The problem is, last week (and as far back as I can remember) 6" sandwiches got 4 slices of meat and footlongs got 8. As you can see in the attached picture, 3 slices of meat leave a significant hole in the sandwich. I asked the manager on duty, and his response was that it was new policy due to rising costs. I realize I could be making my own sandwiches at home, but now I have a strong incentive to do so...$6.19 for a 6" substandard sub no longer cuts it."  Scott writes, "I just went to the store & bought the new shapely bottles of Tropicana Orange Juice. Though the bottle is smaller from 96 oz to 89 oz the bottle shape is the same dimensions (L*W*H). They just "squeezed" the sides of bottle inward."  Ethan writes, "Noticed this at target today."
 Scott writes, "I noticed a little while ago that the packaging had shrunk for this jerky maker. At the time, I looked but the portion size stayed the same - 4oz per container. I thought something was amiss and kept checking but could never find proof until Thursday night. They now shrunk what you get and keep it at the same price. I took these pictures at 7-11 with my cell phone and tried to get the price and size in both. They were both marked at $5.99 even though one package clearly was marked at 3.5 oz and the other marked at 4 oz. Almost all of the 4 oz packages were gone and I made sure that I got both in Original flavor in case of discrepancy with flavor and cost."  Katie writes, "I was running low on napkins at work. Much to my chagrin, I noticed the old Bounty package contained 20 more napkins 6 months ago than the package I bought today. Not exactly the quicker picker upper I expected. All I had was the empty wrapper of the old one so my sister came up with a great idea on photographing this shrinkage. When will the madness end?? -Katie Cleveland, OH"  Matthew writes,"Even after reading your site daily I still got caught by the grocery shrink ray yesterday. My favorite Margherita pepperoni packages shrunk from 6 oz to 4.5 oz since the last time I bought them. I took a picture of a package I had at home and the new one. "







































According to this article, the Grocery Shrink Ray could be hitting all of Pepsi products. (Thanks to Mike!)


Ed writes, "I shopped at the Walmart I regularly go to for, among other things, Gillette Mach 3 replacement blades. They have been available in 4, 8, and 12 packs for seemingly ever. The unit pricing for each was typically very close. 4 packs were about $8.25, 8 packs were $16.45, give or take.

Today, I discovered that the 4 pack is now a 5 pack. The insidious part is that the unit price per blade in the 4 pack went from about $2.06 in the 4 pack to $2.25 in the 5 pack, while the 8 pack unit price did not go up as much - $2.10 from $2.06. While I get that it is very common for bigger volume packs to have a lower unit price, this was not the case for this product. This had held true for at least 5 years.

The other interesting aspect of this is that P&G did the opposite of the "shrink ray." They grew/expanded the content and they sharply increased the price for that package. "

Brian writes,"I've been making my world (read: within my household) famous nachos for years now, and always with the same ingredients. The final part of cooking up the topping is a 15 oz. can of Hunts Tomato Sauce, a 4 oz. can of diced jalapenos (either Ortega or La Victoria), and an 8ish oz. can of diced ortega chiles. All of the items came in their normal sizes at their normal prices, but they are all far more watery than they have been in the past. I noticed it as I poured them into the pan, and now that they've been simmering for a good 20 minutes, it's far, far thinner than usual. I think there may be some companies watering down their ingredients rather than making the serving size smaller. Is this the grocery version of water-diluted gas?"

Got a hot grocery-shrink-ray tip? Send your pictures and stories to tips@consumerist.com.

]]>
Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:59:59 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5027266&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Subway Says Get Off Your Phone Or Go To The Back Of The Line ]]> Sean says he approves of the this sign that he saw at an Idaho Subway location today, but his wife wasn't a fan...

My wife thought it was ridiculous, but I kind of like the idea of sending those annoying line-talkers to the back.

Well, you know us, we're always biased toward the consumer.... but those line-talkers are on their own this time.

]]>
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:45:43 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5030165&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Are Unlimited Ride MetroCards A Good Deal? Not For A Lot Of People Who Use Them ]]> The New York Times had an article today about the 10 year anniversary of the unlimited MetroCard and how it has transformed way people use the subway. They even included a graph that showed how many times people are using their cards in a month. What they didn't mention is that a lot of people are buying the card and not hitting the "break even" point of 46 rides per month. Hmm.

For those of you not familiar with NYC's MetroCard system, it works like this: If you buy individual rides, after $7 you get a 15% bonus, making your ride cost $1.74 instead of $2.00. The unlimited card costs $81. So to "break even" you'd need to take about 46 trips within 30 days, or 1.5 trips every day — even on weekends. Obviously, there are a lot of people using unlimited MetroCards when they would be better off buying trips in bulk. Why are they doing this? Who knows. Maybe they don't have to pay for the cards themselves. Still, it's a lesson that can be applied to "unlimited" deals of all types. Make sure to do a little math before you buy an unlimited pass.

Subway and Bus Fares [MTA]
In Decade of Unlimited Rides, MetroCard Has Transformed How the City Travels [NYT]
It's the distribution, stupid [frumination via BuzzFeed]

]]>
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:10:59 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025851&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Subway Takes Knife In Sandwich Very Seriously ]]> WHO: Subway
WHAT: A man says he ate a subway sandwich and it had a 7-inch serrated blade inside.
WHERE: NYC man says he found knife in Subway sandwich [AP] (Thanks to Jeff!)
THE QUOTE: "Subway restaurants spokesman Kevin Kane says food safety and customer comments are taken "very seriously" and that the company is "investigating the facts."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again in public statements whenever they have bad PR. Our series of posts on occurrences of the phrase is our attempt to question how seriously companies are really taking these matters if every time they trot out this phrase by rote.

(Photo: Morton Fox, Getty)

]]>
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:50:14 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025762&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Man Loses 86 lbs Eating 1,200-1,400 Calories Per Day Of McDonald's Food ]]> Chris Coleson, a businessman from Richmond, VA told his wife he could lose weight by eating anywhere — even McDonald's.

"I told her I could lose weight eating anywhere," he said. "I told her I could do it eating at McDonald's."

So he did. By eating two meals a day (and only two meals) consisting of "wraps, apple-walnut salads and the occasional cheeseburger" Chris has lost 86 lbs since December.

Coleson told AdAge that he's not interested in being the next "Jared," but would like to encourage McDonald's to build playgrounds where parents with disabilities can play with their children.

"I wasn't disabled when I weighed 300 pounds, but it made me think about parents who are," said Mr. Coleson. He currently "works closely with his local YMCA and the Wounded Warrior Project, which provides services to disabled veterans," says AdAge.

Has McDonald's Found Its Jared? [AdAge]
(Photo: meghannmarco )

]]>
Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:58:35 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5017690&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Subway's Gift Card Machine Is Indefinitely Broken ]]> Reader Kristina was hungry and ready to make use of her Subway $20 gift card, however, when she tried to redeem it at the Subway store at Water and Wall St. in Manhattan, the transaction unfolded like this:

Me: *offers gift card as payment*
Employee: "Nope."
Me: "I'm sorry?"
Employee: "No gift cards."
Me: "But this is a Subway gift card. And I am in Subway."
Employee: "No gift cards."
Me: "It says on the gift card that this is used like cash in a Subway."
Employee: "Machine's down. You want your sandwich or not?"

This might seem like a routine glitch, but over a month later, "the machine" is still inoperative. Kristina's letter, inside...

Over a month ago, I went to the Subway at Water and Wall in Manhattan with the intention of using a gift card a friend had given me as payment. I ordered my sandwich, but when I went to give the employee the gift card, I was informed very rudely that the gift card processing system was down and as such it could not be accepted. Dialogue:

Me: *offers gift card as payment*
Employee: "Nope."
Me: "I'm sorry?"
Employee: "No gift cards."
Me: "But this is a Subway gift card. And I am in Subway."
Employee: "No gift cards."
Me: "It says on the gift card that this is used like cash in a Subway."
Employee: "Machine's down. You want your sandwich or not?"

I could have paid cash, but the employee was so unpleasant in his response (bad tone, sounded very impatient and trying to rush me out despite there being no other customers there, no apologies offered) that I just left and went to another Subway on John Street (they are every other block in my area). The other Subway was having the same problem (you'd think the employee in the first Subway would have mentioned that the issue was not isolated), but the manager there was very apologetic and even gave me a free sandwich for my trouble.

I filed a complaint for the Water Street Subway on the company's website and received a letter thanking me for my comments, but it was just a generic response. This past Wednesday night I decided to give the Water Street location another chance, and they *still* hadn't fixed the gift card issue.

Kristina

We did some research and called the store at 122 Water St. and found out, not surprisingly, that the gift card machine still doesn't work. The employee we spoke to did not know why it had been broken for so long and when we asked when it would be fixed he simply hung up.

We found this number for Subway Global HQ: (800) 888-4848. If you hit 85 for customer service you are able to leave information regarding specific store complaints which, according to the recording, will be forwarded to a regional office and store owner. If you would like to escalate your complaint via snail mail their address is: Subway Global HQ, Customer Care, 325 Bic Drive, Milford, CT 06460. Good luck, and keep us updated.

]]>
Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:39:23 EDT Jay Slatkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5014315&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ There Are Bed Bugs On The Subway Benches. Yes, Really. ]]> Bedbugs are usually thought of as something that only hotel guests have to worry about, but apparently New Yorkers who like to sit on benches while they wait for the subway should be concerned about the bloodsuckers as well.

The NYPost says:

At a recent Department of Housing, Preservation and Development forum on the subject, a city bedbug educator admitted to seeing the pests on benches in subway stations - in one case, catching a ride on an unsuspecting straphanger's caboose at Brooklyn's Hoyt-Schermerhorn station, according to people at the meeting.

The official, identified as Edward Brownbear, also reported seeing the bugs on wooden benches at the Union Square and Fordham Road stations in Manhattan and The Bronx, respectively.

Well, ew. Kind of makes you appreciate those frigid outdoor comparatively-pestilence-free Chicago L platforms. Sorta.

SUBWAYS' BLOOD-BUG INVASION [NYP]

]]>
Wed, 14 May 2008 14:03:22 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5008942&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Subway Sandwiches Now With Rusty Bolt Goodness! ]]> According to News 10, Josh Sjowall ordered a foot-long roast beef combo at a Subway store in Tracy, California. As he picked up the sandwich he felt a foreign object with his thumb and discovered it was a rusty bolt. And oh yes, Subway is...."taking it very seriously." Details and photo, inside...

The article says,

I felt something strange with my thumb and said, 'What the hell," said Sjowall, 17. Josh's mom saw it, too."It looked like a big bug. Then I realized it was a bolt baked into the roll," said Jeri Sjowall.

And Jeri Sjowall was right — what Josh found was a rusty 3/4-inch bolt baked into the bread of his sandwich.

The Sjowalls took the sandwich back to the store, where managers didn't doubt their claim. A Subway manager said the company was taking the allegation very seriously and they're investigating where the bolt may have come from.

The sandwich was express-mailed back to General Mills headquarters in Minnesota, where Subway's bread is baked.

At least this foreign object can be put to use. Perhaps it is the elusive part Mr. Sjowall needs to fix his '67 Camaro. Or maybe this will be Josh's "lucky" rusty bolt that will one day be passed to his grandchild. If all else fails, you could whip it at Jared if you ever see him around. Here's to you, Subway!

Tracy Teen: What's a Rusty Bolt Doing In My Subway Sub? [News 10] (Thanks to Ethan!)
(Photo: News 10)

]]>
Fri, 09 May 2008 11:06:36 EDT Jay Slatkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5008401&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ San Francisco Orders Restaurants To Display Calorie Information, Industry Laughs ]]> San Francisco passed a resolution last week requiring chain restaurants to display calorie information on their menus, but the industry couldn't care less. They will continue fattening us up like gingerbread cash-cows, regardless of whatever regulations pitiful municipalities hurl their way.

San Francisco's proposal would cover about 200 restaurants with over 20 locations. Each would be required to pay an annual $350 fee to fund a half-time compliance inspector.

San Francisco joins New York City and Washington's King County in the battle to protect consumers with information, a fight that has not gone well for municipalities. California Governator Arnold Schwarzenegger recently vetoed a bill that would require nutrition labeling throughout the state, and New York City was barred by a judge from enforcing its regulations until April 15, when the plan may be tossed altogether.

Subway is the only restaurant we know of to voluntarily display nutritional information on their menus, and apparently, they haven't been driven out of business. Go figure.

San Francisco passes menu label ordinance [ThePacker.com]
San Francisco Mayor Signs Menu Labeling Bill [CSPI]

]]>
Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:03:14 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373441&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ NYC To Vote On New And Improved Menu Labeling Regulation ]]> The New York City Board of Health will vote today on a new regulation requiring calories on menu boards in New York City. The former rule was shot down by a federal judge who ruled that the regulation's criteria for determining which restaurants would be required to post calorie information on their menus was illegal.

Instead of requiring restaurants who "already provide nutritional information" to do so on their menus, the new regulation will compel restaurants with more than 15 locations nationwide to post calorie information on menus or menu boards.

The new regulation will go into effect on March 31.

Health Department Pushes For Calorie Listings Again [NY1]

]]>
Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:58:32 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=347587&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Turkey subs from Subways in Manhattan now ... ]]> Turkey subs from Subways in Manhattan now cost $11.03! [East Village Idiot]

]]>
Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:04:04 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=331397&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 60 Minutes Tackles The Menu Labeling Controversy ]]> 60minutes.jpg60 minutes aired a lengthy report last night on the menu labeling controversy, and all the usual suspects were in attendance.

Regular readers will be familiar with all the twists and turns in the report, but its worth watching if only to see Wendy's try to convince Lesley Stahl that putting calories on menu boards is impossible and that the chain isn't worried about sales dropping.

Also included in the report is an interview with Brian Wansink, a nutrition and marketing professor at Cornell University and author of Mindless Eating. If you're at all interested in the ways that food marketing manipulates you, you should check out Brian's research at Cornell's food and brand lab. One of the best parts of the report is the look on one customer's face when Wansink tells him the Subway combo he thought had 300 calories really has 1300.

Wansink then asked another consumer who had chosen the same combo:

"Well, let's say for instance that we would have had the calories listed on the menu when you ordered something like that. Would that influence what you ordered?" Wansink asked a man.

"Absolutely. I don't think I would have gotten it. I mean, 1,350 calories for a Subway," the man replied.

Expert: Many Underestimate Calories [60 Minutes]

]]>
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:26:48 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=324478&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Subway Cheese Scam Protest Tshirt Designed ]]> scamshirt.jpgFor only $12.95, you can protest Subway's cheese geometry scam in this fetching tee.

A writeup on Digg says, "The Subway cheese "problem" has been bothering a good friend for quite some time, and after he saw the latest news on the Consumerist a day or so ago, he decided to make a protest t-shirt. I may have to wear one into my local subway as soon as the shirt shows up."

Tongue firmly lodged in cheek, to get every last morsel of improperly laid isosceles cheese from our Subway sandwich that we deserve, we might just buy one.

Scam Tee [Spreadshirt]
PREVIOUSLY: Subway's Incorrect Use Of Isosceles Cheese Actually A Vast Conspiracy

]]>
Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:59:23 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=299321&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Judge Tosses NYC Menu Labeling Regulation ]]> UPDATE: Menu labeling isn't dead yet, the CSPI says the judge objected to an easily fixable condition of the NYC regulation.

The menu labeling controversy got a little more controversial today when a federal judge ruled that NYC could not require fast food restaurants to post calorie information on their menus. From the Associated Press:

U.S. District Judge Richard J. Holwell said he determined the rule conflicted with federal law. Businesses had claimed that their First Amendment rights were violated by the rule, described as the first of its kind in the nation, but Howell said he reached his decision without needing to address those claims.
...
In the last 25 years, obesity rates have doubled among U.S. adults and tripled among children, and rates have increased in every state in the nation, the groups said.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated in a 2005 study that approximately 112,000 deaths are associated with obesity each year, making obesity the second leading contributor to premature death, behind tobacco.

In arguments supporting the city's rule, the groups argued that an adverse ruling would undermine pending legislation in state and local legislatures around the country.

Legislation similar to New York City's is under way in 14 states where obesity rates have recently surged - Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Vermont.

Nutrition labeling legislation has also been introduced in Chicago, Philadelphia and Washington.

New York City's rule took effect in July, but enforcement was suspended pending the outcome of the court fight.

Initially we thought this rule sounded stupid, but then Subway complied with it rather than join the lawsuit and we saw how useful the idea was, especially for people who are trying to control their weight. Having the calorie information on the menu board makes it easy for consumers to compare menu choices and encourages personal responsibility without limiting choices for people who want as much bacon as possible at all times.

Will Subway continue to provide calorie information on its menu boards even though it doesn't have to? We hope so.


Judge tosses NYC calorie-posting rule [Citizen-Times] (Thanks, Henry!)
(Photo:CSPI)

]]>
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:09:03 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=298704&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Subway's Incorrect Use Of Isosceles Cheese Actually A Vast Conspiracy ]]> Subway's penchant for not using their triangle cheese correctly is actually part of a diabolical mind-control plan to get you to pay more.

Back in July, Lefthandedtoons drew a cartoon mocking how Subway has triangle cheese, but never arranges it in a rhombus on the sandwich. Instead, Subway invariably lays it in a razorback formation, which the cartoonist felt led to "unnecessary dairy overlap" and "soul-crushing disappointment."

Amused, a UK subway worker printed out the cartoon at work. His boss was not amused and hung the above sign in the storage room, which reads, "Cheese triangles need to be placed [drawing of razorback formation] -> this will promote the need for customers to desire extra cheese - as it doesn't cover whole sandwich. Double cheese [picture of double razorback] = 40 p extra!"

Subway: A Method to Their Cheesy Madness [Left-Handed Toons]
PREVIOUSLY: Dear Subway, Please Use Your Isosceles Cheese Correctly

]]>
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 07:55:53 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=298476&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Just Asking Politely Sometimes Does The Trick ]]> con_ilovemygrandma.jpg Reader Tim tried to pay for his Subway meal with a debit card today but was foiled by a technical snafu with the card reader. He didn't have cash on him, but there was an ATM machine in the store, so he withdrew the funds and paid the old-fashioned way. The trouble was, he was now stuck with a $2 ATM fee for a $12 purchase.

He decided it was worth at least asking if the store would reimburse him the fee. "I asked the manager if she would give me $2 off my total. She did more than that, rounding the price down to $10 from about $12.60."

As Tim points out, "It never hurts to ask for a discount if you were inconvenienced during a transaction. You usually want to talk to the manager... [and] remember that this person is doing you a favor, so be polite."

(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:17:20 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=298364&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Wendy's Sends Scary Legal Threats Over Photoshopped Menu That Includes Calorie Info ]]> Wendy's has sent the CSPI a scary legal threat letter over a photoshopped sample (click image for larger version) of a possible Wendy's menu board included as an exhibit in the ongoing "Menugate" lawsuit.

Wendy's claims in a letter send both to CSPI and to the United States District Court of New York, that CSPI is presenting the menu board as authentic when it was in fact "doctored" (Wendy's words) and accuses CSPI and it's of being "misleading" and of "improper use of Wendy's trademark."

As Constant Readers of the blog are already aware, there's a legal battle going on over a new NYC regulation that requires large chain restaurants that already provide nutritional information to add calorie info to their menus.

We were initially skeptical of this regulation until Subway went ahead and complied with it. The resulting menus were exceptionally useful and uncluttered-looking, and we were convinced that the regulation has merit and would help consumers make better food choices.

Incidentally, we were also sort of shocked to learn, through model menus supplied by the CSPI, that some Starbucks venti fraps have more than 700 calories.

If we didn't know that, does the average consumer? Probably not.

And now Wendy's is sending scary legal letters over hypothetical menus.

We have to ask you just one thing: Why would the Center for Science in the Public Interest represent a menu board with calorie information on it as an authentic Wendy's menu board in a lawsuit where Wendy's is trying to keep calorie information off the menu board?

Here's the paragraph in question, the "misleading" one, in which Dr. Margo Wootan of the CSPI supposedly misrepresents the photoshopped board:

22. See Appendix C for model Starbucks and Wendy's menus. These model menus demonstrate that providing calories on the menu can be done without being confusing, difficult to read, or cluttering the menu.
According to the CSPI, Wendy's is the chain at the forefront of weaseling out of the new regulation.
nycohno.jpg
In an effort to slip through a loophole that lets restaurant chains who do not already provide nutritional information opt out of the requirement, Wendy's added a disclaimer to their website claiming that their nutritional information doesn't apply to NYC.

Are we meant to believe that just by adding a legal disclaimer a Double Stack won't make you fat?

Here's Wendy's explanation, from their website:

We regret that Wendy's cannot provide product calorie information to residents or customers in New York City. The New York City Department of Health passed a regulation requiring restaurants that already provide calorie information to post product calories on their menu boards — using the same type size as the product listing.

We fully support the intent of this regulation; however, since most of our food is made-to-order, there isn't enough room on our existing menu boards to comply with the regulation. We have for years provided complete nutritional information on posters inside the restaurant and on our website. To continue to provide caloric information to residents and customers of our New York City restaurants on our website and on our nutritional posters would subject us to this regulation. As a result, we will no longer provide caloric information to residents and customers of our New York City restaurants.

We regret this inconvenience. If you have questions about this regulation, please contact the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and refer to Health Code Section 81.50.

Made to order? What? Subway doesn't seem to be having a problem, are their subs not "made to order?" In any case, being located in NYC didn't stop the Consumerist from accessing nutritional information via Wendy's site.

Anyway, thanks to Wendy's misguided legal bullying, we've now read Dr. Wootan's testimony and have learned some interesting facts about the need for better menu labeling. Think you know how many calories are in your food?

Did you know...

Two jelly-filled doughnuts at Dunkin' Donuts have fewer calories than a sesame bagel with cream cheese?

A Frappuccino at Starbucks can have 200 more calories than the same size cappuccino?

A whole fried onion appetizer at a typical table service restaurant has 1,300 more calories than the fried mozzarella sticks?

We didn't!

Dr. Wootan's Testimony
Wendy's Scary Legal Letter To CSPI (PDF)
Wendy's Scary Legal Letter To The Court (PDF)
CSPI's response to Wendy's Scary Legal Letter (PDF)
(Photo:CSPI)


]]>
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:25:41 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=283811&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dear Subway, Please Use Your Isosceles Cheese Correctly ]]> Come on guys, you got the putting calories on the menu thing right. Now, let's try draping the calories across the sub in a geometrically satisfying pattern, the one that fulfills the design destiny intended by your sandwich scientists. Spurn not their legacy.

An Open Letter To Subway [Left-Handed Toons] (Thanks to Ryan!)

]]>
Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:14:31 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=279647&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Subway's "3 Foot" Subs Are Shorter Than 3 Feet ]]> Apropos of our post on new Subway Super-Stuffed Subs, the Arizona Department of Weights and Measures sent us this KNVX investigative news clip into sandwiches that weren't quite measuring up...
We got a complaint about six months ago concerning six-foot subs that weren't six feet long. Subway's response was to change its advertising - in Arizona at least - but not address the issue that its six-foot subs were about four inches short of the advertised length.
Our favorite part is when the calipers show Subway's three-foot sub box isn't even three feet long.

Sub-Standard [KNVX]

]]>
Mon, 09 Jul 2007 20:34:47 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=276511&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Updated: Subway Introduces Calorie Bomb Sandwich (It's Called A Super-Stuffed Sub) ]]>

UPDATE: We called Subway (like we should've done at first) and the sandwich is called a "Super Stuffed Sub". One of them is named, "The Feast." In it, you get all the meats (turkey, ham, salami, pepperoni, and roast beef) plus bacon and cheese on "special double-braided bread" (aka challah bread), for $7.99. The sandwich is being test-marketed in NY. Here are some pics of some dudes trying to eat one. They look like they're choking. Subway seems to be trying to one-up the the mondo-meal market pioneered by McDonald's Supersize.

Somehow we don't think Jared would approve.

While Subway opens up the calories on their menu on the one hand, on the other they're launching a giant new sandwich we would expect more to see from Burger King.

benpopken: speaking of subway, have you seen those commercials for "the jammer?"
meghannmarco: no what's that?
benpopken: it's disgusting
benpopken: it's a new subway sandwich
benpopken: it's like as big as your head
meghannmarco: wha
benpopken: and you can't get your mouth around it at all
benpopken: it's like a medieval lord sandwich
meghannmarco: woah
meghannmarco: pix pls
benpopken: trying to find
benpopken: this isn't it but this guy makes a subway sub in 35 seconds
benpopken: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_5p4BCCYLI
benpopken: i can't find any pix
meghannmarco: that is a sandwich artist
benpopken: maybe i have the name wrong

Let us know if you have any more information regarding this exotic beast.

]]>
Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:38:46 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=276265&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Subway Is Not Ashamed: First Fast Food Restaurant To Put Calorie Info On Menus ]]> While the other large fast food chains sue the City of New York to keep calorie information off their menus, Subway has gone ahead and complied with the New York City regulation. Dunkin' Donuts, meanwhile, submitted a sample menu meant to "prove" that putting calorie info on its menu just couldn't be done... and the NYC Health Department responded by having its own graphic designer redo the sign to prove that it could be done.

The result is hilarious. From NEW YORK STATE RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION VS NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF HEALTH:

Dunkin' Donuts submitted a sample menu board in an attempt to demonstrate that calorie information would not fit along with price information. From that sample, the Department's director of graphics produced a replica of the menu board with comparable fonts and layout to demonstrate that calories could be listed easily and visibly, as shown in the illustrations below, and in Mr. Krueger's declaration.. These modifications, as well as the earlier examples, provide clear evidence that calorie listings required by the regulations are feasible to implement with basic graphic design techniques.

http://consumerist.com/assets/resources/2007/07/dunkindonutswhiny-thumb.jpg

Dunkin' Donut's sample menu is on the left, NYC's on the right. We were initially skeptical of this regulation, but have to admit that the Subway menu looks really nice and doesn't seem weird or gross at all. And, since the regulation only applies to big restaurant chains who have already had their nutritional info calculated... We fail to see what the big deal is. For background on what the regulation is and who it applies to, click here.

New York State Restaurant Association VS New York Board of Heath, New York Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, (Legal Brief, PDF) [CSPI]

PREVIOUSLY: NYC Restaurant Group Sues Over Nutritional Info Regulation

]]>
Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:18:20 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=276255&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Secret Menu Items Confirmed With Undercover Investigative Journalism ]]> A reporter at the Arizona Daily Star decided to put our little Secret Menu Items post to the test by ordering the items at some of our nations finest fast food eating establishments.

What did he discover? Secret menu items are for real.

On the Chipotle Chicken Quesadilla: "It's so good that I tell them they should have it on the menu, to which the kindly lady who prepared my food wistfully says, "Hopefully, it will be, someday."

On the Subway Pizza Sub:
"There are like nine pepperoni slices on it, and maybe it's just my imagination, but I could swear I felt my arteries hardening with every bite."

On the Jamba Juice Pink Starburst Smoothie:
"It tastes — wait for it — like a pink Starburst candy, albeit in liquid form. And instead of being done with it after a few seconds, I have a giant cup of it."

We sort of want to try that chicken quesadilla. He made it sound really good. —MEGHANN MARCO

Top secret [Arizona Daily Star]
(Photo: uberculture)

PREVIOUSLY: The Really Big Guide To Secret Menu Items

]]>
Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:51:04 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=267304&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Subway To Sell Personal Pan Pizza By June ]]> Heavens knows why, but Subway has decided to add personal pan pizza to its menu at 13,000 US stores by June. So much for that whole "healthy image." From Brandweek:

An employee at a test store located in the East Village section of New York City said they only sold two pizzas the first day of the test in late March, but are now are up about 25 a day. The biggest problem: patrons don't know about the product despite a prominent sign on the menu board, he said.
The pizzas will start at $2.99. Meat toppings such as pepperoni or sausage will cost an extra dollar. Veggies and cheese are free. According to Brandweek, "After you eat this you won't go back to Pizza Hut," the Subway employee in New York boasted. We haven't been back to PIzza Hut since they stopped giving us free pizza for reading books. —MEGHANN MARCO

New Products: Subway Seeks To Slice Domino's, Pizza Hut Pie [Brandweek]
(Photo: zyphbear)

]]>
Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:18:34 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=250693&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Really Big Guide To Secret Menu Items ]]> Not content ordering from the menu? Need to have that extra little bit of class that comes from "knowing the chef"?

Here it is, your guide to secret menu items. Sure, it's not the secret rib eye at Nobu, but it's something. Before reading this please note that this article has not been fact-checked. This report is based purely on reader suggestions. We are posting them entirely without confirmation and are not going to try to order any of this crap in order to confirm its existence. We would die of heart disease, be broke, and our ass would be the size of Texas. This is the internet, the internet is not fact-checked, and these are your secret menu items. Enjoy.



Taco Bell: Everything Taco Bell makes is comprised of a few basic ingredients, so they'll likely make anything they have the stuff for, which is probably pretty much anything they've ever served. Examples to attempt: Cheesy Gordita Crunch, Cheesy Fiesta Potatoes, Encharito.

Wendy's: A tipster tells us, "order a "Grand Slam", It would otherwise be called a Classic Quadruple, were it on the menu." Reader bringafajita suggests trying to get a "Quarter Pound Double Stack with Cheese." FishingCrue tells us to try "Everything" (lettuce and tomato) on a Wendy's Double Stack, sometimes it's even free. If they look at you like you're crazy, tell them there's a button for it. A double stack with everything, add bacon is a decent sandwich for somewhere south of 2 bones."

Chipotle: Chipotle will, like Taco Bell, make anything they have the ingredients for. Unlike Taco Bell, this is an official policy. Some suggestions: Nachos, Quesadilla, Individual Tacos, Taco Salads, Tiny Bean Burritos Using Taco Shells, Fresh Cilantro on Your Tacos, whatever you can think of.

Subway: Subway will still make the "pizza sub," and many other former menu items. Also, they can't sell "broken cookies," so they may give you some for free.

Jamba Juice: Jamba has an entire secret menu of "unhealthy" smoothies named after things that would involve copyright violations were they to be included on the menu. The ones we know of:White Gummi Bear, Red Gummi Bear, Green Gummi Bear, Raspberry Dreamin', Pineapple Dreamin', Sourpatch Kid, Tropical Tango, Pacific Passion, Berry Depressing, Now and Later, Peanut Butter and Jelly, Apple Pie, Fruity Pebbles, Rainbow Sherbet, Strawberry Shortcake, Push Pop, Skittles, Andres' Surprise, and Lemonade Lightnin'. (Thanks,ronaldscott!)
100100.jpg
In-N-Out Burger: Has their "secret" menu posted on their website, but a tipster writes in: "Not only can you get an animal style burger but you can also get animal style fries which are amazing. It's fries piled with onions, cheese and sauce and they come with a fork." In addition, we hear several voices calling from the mist, whispering that the secret menu doesn't stop at 4 x 4., but may, in fact, go on to infinity. Or at least to 100 x 100...
(Thanks, xapplexjuicex!)

Starbucks: Starbucks will make you absolutely anything you want no matter how insane it is, according to our tipster.

"Baristas might try and tell their customers that no, we can't do that with the blenders. This is a lie. Starbucks corporate policy is that the customer is ALWAYS right (even when the request is stupid). If you really insist that you want your iced soy latte blended, the baristas HAVE to do it. If they continue to refuse, ask to speak to a manager and either they'll realize they're about to get in trouble and will fill your request, or the manager will come out and politely tell the barista to make the customer happy.

Absolutely any concoction that you can think of (involving any type of milk, syrup, coffee, etc.) will be made for you. The limits to Starbucks "secret menu" are merely the limits of your imagination. You can even bring supplements from home and ask the barista to please include that in your drink."
Well, damn.

Dairy Queen: Reader Falconfire says: "I couldn't even begin to tell you the list of Dairy Queen secret menu items. Lets put it this way, there is a huge book every DQ has to have, you want it, it's in there. It may not be listed as a item, but the instruction on how to make it and what to use are in there as well as how it is rung up. About the only thing they cant make is seasonal items, since they usually require a ingredient not carried normally."

Chili's: According to Reader Elara, they no longer have chili on the menu (what?) but if you ask them, they'll bring you a cup.

Blimpie: Attention veggie-lovers: Reader VeryFancyBunny says: "Blimpie used to have a sandwich called the "Cheese Trio" on the menu. They took it off years ago (at least around here), but I've been able to order it with no problem. Otherwise, all their sandwiches involve meat."

Burger King: Try the "mustard whopper," a whopper with mustard rather than mayo, from Reader dwneylonsr, and the "veggie whopper" from VeryFancyBunny, which is just a whopper with the meat omitted. Reader sixtoe suggests attempting to get the "Bull's-Eye BBQ Burger."

Popeye's: mullenite suggests ordering the "Naked Chicken," which is chicken with no breading. Sounds very Atkins.

TGIFriday's: Readers junkmail and mullenite tell us that TGIF have a "Five Easy Pieces" policy that says they'll make anything you want with the crap they've got in the kitchen.

Denny's: Speaking of Five Easy Pieces, Reader weave says: "Don't expect a secret menu at Denny's. I went in there and asked for a grilled cheese sandwich and they were baffled. They finally decided to give me Moons over My Hammy and toss out the ham — and charge me the full price for it." Did she hold the ham between her knees?

and finally, at Arby's: sixtoe likes the "French Dip."

Thanks to everyone for sharing their knowledge of the wild and woolly world of nationwide chain restaurants. You are the heroes. Let your indigestion be a mark of your bravery.

Did we forget something? If you'd like to suggest an item for this guide, email tips [at] consumerist [dot] com. Put "Secret Menu" in the subject.
—MEGHANN MARCO

(Photo: cogdogblog)

]]>
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:20:52 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=239708&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ NYC RFID Subway Turnstiles Spread ]]>

New RFID turnstiles mean Citibank customers with enabled cards or credit wands need never fumble for a Metrocard again.

Reader C-side spotted this one at at the Broadway/Lafayette subway station in Manhattan.

Eventually, RFID will spread to ever every transaction point. They're already at McDonald's. Forward-thinking churches will use RFID collection plates.

Good thing the security of broadcasting one's credit card information via transponder is completely worked out... — BEN POPKEN

Another picture, inside.

http://www.consumerist.com/assets/resources/2006/11/subrfid2-thumb.jpg

]]>
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:19:06 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=214531&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Subway Sub Fingerlickin' ]]> It's been too long since we reported on a severed human finger found in fast food. Such stories are just so exciting! Yes, invariably they are scams. But for a brief moment, your soul heaves in exhilaration, and you begin weaving wonderful fantasies about that poor, shriveling digit. Was it a back kitchen knife fight? Does the manager require Yakuza-like atonement from his wayward staff?

This time, it's not Wendy's serving a finger in a chili cup. It's Subway. A woman claims to have found a half-inch piece of finger in her sandwich. It's not going to be a finger: the manager claims it just looks like "a big piece of fat," which is gross but not criminal.

We would love to find a bit of finger in a Subway sub. At least it's real meat.

Officials probe finger-in-sandwich claim [Yahoo! News]

]]>
Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:58:07 EDT consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=209363&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Funeral Directors Want Londoners To Kill Themselves ]]>

Last time we posted a picture of an advertisement encouraging people to kill themselves, a reader commented: "If they said things like "kids like psp" no one would give two fucks and the consumerist wouldnt be posting everyday, giving the psp more exposure that it would ever have on a site like this. quit reading into this shit, and shut up"

We're right there with you man. Unfortunately, we can't exactly run a site like this by not talking about clueless companies, stupid ads and bad customer service. Trust us, we've tried to convince our Gawker overlords to take the Consumerist in a direction where they continue to pay us, yet we don't have to write anything intelligible. They aren't biting... they point to Kotaku as a failed experiment in that direction. So the reader in the comment above will have to join us in howling at the moon, flinging feces and clubbing each other to death with monkey femurs in our impotent rage over the injustice of having to actually, you know, write stuff for a living.

Which is only tangentially apropos to the above ad we saw on Adfreaks. Like the Playstation ad, it encourages readers to get themselves vaporized by an incoming train. Even better, it is for a Funeral Director's Association.

Another subway ad that wants you to jump [AdFreak]
Related: Sony To Customers: Kill Others
Related: Sony to Customers: Kill Yourselves

]]>
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:11:58 EST consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=163060&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Subway Outnumbers Subways ]]>

From the Department of Questionable Milestones comes the news that Subway — the international chain of sandwich shops mostly known for trying to pass off limp bags of soggy precooked steak as the fillings of a Philly Cheese from Brooklyn to Dubai — is outpacing the New York MTA. In Manhattan, there are now more Subway shops than subway stops.

Apparently, the only hope the MTA has to catch up is to speed up completion of the Second Avenue subway, which isn't expected to be completed for another decade. Valuable time lost for the already buckling MTA as their identity is stolen right out from under their noses by a company best known for making some of the worst hoagies on Earth.

'Subway' Eateries Outpace Stations [New York Post]

]]>
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:54:05 EST consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=162383&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sony to Customers: Kill Yourselves ]]> C_17_Articles_206881_BodyWeb_Detail_0_Image.jpgSony might want to start rethinking their subversive ad strategy. First, they came under fire for paying street hooligans to spray paint their logos on private property. And now, in London, they are posting advertisements openly encouraging their customers to kill themselves.

To the left, you'll see an advertisement for the Sony Playstation 2 that — up until recently — was on display at the London Picadilly station. In a blood red font juxtaposed against the blank infinity of death, Sony encourages its viewers to toss themselves underneath the sharp, churning wheels of an oncoming subway car.

We're not advertising geniuses or anything, but it seems to us that — unless you're marketing exclusively to goths — there's better strategies to get new customers than by trying to convince them to commit suicide. Coming up next: Sony gives shotguns to hopped-up Vietnam Vets covered in invisible insects and pays them to begin shooting random people in the face while screaming "Playstation!"

Link: No play station, say Metro bosses

]]>
Thu, 09 Mar 2006 05:27:51 EST consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=159332&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Agency Sells Ads Inside Game Without Creator's Permission ]]> subway_cs.jpgArs Technica reports on a fascinating Subway ad campaign that took place inside the popular online game Counter-Strike. Apparently the ads for a $2.49 sandwich were injected into the game world with a special bit of 'mod' software distributed by an ad agency to certain operators of the server computers on which games of Counter-Strike are hosted. The ad agency paid the server operators to run the mod to give ad impressions in game.

Now advertisements in games are far from new. What is interesting is that a third-party company, entirely unrelated from Valve (the producers of Counter-Strike), has found a way to make money from the millions of people who play the game without dealing with Valve directly. Valve has implied that this violates the terms of their End-User License Agreement (EULA), which means there is likely going to be a lawsuit about the whole mess shortly.

But ignoring the EULA restrictions, we think it's sort of brilliant. By dint of overwhelming success, Valve has created an alternate media channel all of its own—one filled with the coveted 'young male' demographic. But since Valve chooses to offload the cost of hosting games of Counter-Strike to fans instead of hosting all the servers on their own, they've made it technically impossible to prevent others from piggy-backing on their success.

In fact, since the Counter-Strike server operators have to pay all their own bandwidth fees to operate servers that generate money for Valve by way of more games sold, we think the Subway ad campaign is a pretty healthy way for server operators to recoup some of their hearty expenses. (Again, EULA violations aside.)

We're as surprised as you, but we think we're siding with the ad agency and the server operators on this one. Why should server operators have to pay the operating expenses for an online game without being able to generate their own revenue if they choose?

]]>
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:58:55 EST consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=149465&view=rss&microfeed=true