<![CDATA[Consumerist: Scary]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Scary]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/scary http://consumerist.com/tag/scary <![CDATA[ Wal-Mart Planning Its Own "Geek Squad"? ]]> MarketWatch says that Wal-Mart is "very interested in expanding into installation and repair services in its fast-growing electronics segment."

"We are looking at different options," Gary Severson, a Wal-Mart senior vice president, told MarketWatch during a store tour with media.

The Consumerist would like to take this opportunity to thank Wal-Mart for ensuring the continuing existence of this site. This is going to be fun!

Wal-Mart eyes expansion in electronics services [MarketWatch]

(Photo: Ryan McFarland )

]]>
Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:24:08 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5013936&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Warning: There Are Scorpions In The Walmart Produce Department ]]> 12-year-old Megan Templeton was shopping with her father for some watermelons and hamburgers for their Memorial Day cook-out when she was stung by a stowaway scorpion that had made a home in the produce section of her local Walmart.

From the Charleston Daily Mail:

The Milton Middle School student jerked her hand out of the produce box to find a stinger in her finger and a tan, 1-inch-long creature still attached, William said.

The girl turned to her father and said something he at first didn't believe.

"She said a scorpion stung her on the finger," William, 36, said. "I didn't believe her at first, but then I saw it run underneath (the box)."

William said he immediately called his wife, Paula, who is a paramedic, and told her what had happened.

Paula drove to the store, picked up Megan and rushed her to nearby Cabell-Huntington Hospital.

William said before his wife had even arrived, Wal-Mart employees were on the scene and helped scoop up the exotic arachnid so it could be taken to the hospital for identification purposes.

William said he also peeled a sticker off a watermelon showing the shipment was from Mexico, which he hoped could help hospital workers treat his daughter.

The sting was harmless, but it caused a stir at the West Virginia hospital where Megan was treated. No one had ever seen a scorpion sting before. "They had to look it up on the Internet because it is so unusual in the area," Megan's father said. "Everybody came down to look at it." Walmart says they'll be checking that watermelon shipment for more scorpions— just in case.

12-year-old W.Va. girl gets scorpion bite in the produce department [Charleston Daily Mail]
(Photo: babasteve )

]]>
Tue, 27 May 2008 10:54:41 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5011078&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Wachovia Opens Bank Account Without Permission, Starts Charging Fees ]]> John can't understand how Wachovia charged his startup $12 in fees for failing to maintain a minimum balance when his company never opened an account with Wachovia in the first place. Apparently, his former bank manager decamped to Wachovia and, without his permission, opened a new account "to ensure certain money rates," whatever that means. John isn't mad, and the bank manager agreed to close the account, but John is a little worried because a collections agency has started calling and the account now lists $24.05 in fees.

John doesn't know how the account was opened without his permission, but the former bank manager did have the relevant information needed to open an account. John writes:

We are a startup company that is currently out doing a Series B raise in order to commercialize a product we have in-licensed. The bank manager from our current bank left to join Wachovia. We were always happy with his service and we were not surprised when he contacted us and tried to get us to switch our banking to Wachovia. We indicated that the current timing was not good due to our financing. What we did not know was that he took upon himself to open an account for the company "in order to ensure certain money rates". Boy were we surprised when we got a $12 fee for being below the minimum balance requirements. We joked that as a startup it was nice to know that our "future bank" would be more than happy to take our last $12 as a fee. We contacted our banker friend and he said he would close the account. We are now up to $24.05 in fees and a collection agency has called. Needless to say Wachovia will not be getting our business.
Wow, what a hassle. Invoice the fees to your former bank manager and use the proceeds to pay off Wachovia. Or threaten to call his new boss.

(Photo: epicharmus)

]]>
Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:26:58 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381884&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ A piece of a US Airways jet has fallen off ... ]]> midwestmidwest.jpgA piece of a US Airways jet has fallen off and landed somewhere in Maryland. [ABC2]

]]>
Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:59:55 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=371471&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Comcast Wants To Use Cameras And Facial Recognition To Serve Ads In Your Living Room ]]> Where's my tinfoil? Comcast's senior VP of user experience, Gerard Kunkel, apparently wants to put a camera in your cable box and use it to serve ads.

From NewTeeVee:

If you have some tinfoil handy, now might be a good time to fashion a hat. At the Digital Living Room conference today, Gerard Kunkel, Comcast's senior VP of user experience, told me the cable company is experimenting with different camera technologies built into devices so it can know who's in your living room.

The idea being that if you turn on your cable box, it recognizes you and pulls up shows already in your profile or makes recommendations. If parents are watching TV with their children, for example, parental controls could appear to block certain content from appearing on the screen. Kunkel also said this type of monitoring is the "holy grail" because it could help serve up specifically tailored ads. Yikes.


Kunkel said the system wouldn't be based on facial recognition, so there wouldn't be a picture of you on file (we hope). Instead, it would distinguish between different members of your household by recognizing body forms. He stressed that the system is still in the experimental phase, that there hasn't been consumer testing, and that any rollout "must add value" to the viewing experience beyond serving ads.

Do not want. New TeeVee also has a video interview with Mr. Kunkel in which he talks about the TiVo rollout in Boston and other cableriffic topics. Seems like a nice guy, but I wouldn't let him put a camera in my living room.

Comcast Cameras to Start Watching You? [NewTeeVee] (Thanks, Graham!)
(Photo:cmorran123)

]]>
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:35:53 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370229&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Atlanta area restaurant scores a record-breaking ... ]]> Atlanta area restaurant scores a record-breaking 13 out of 100 in a health inspection. Anything below 70 is considered "unacceptable." [WSBTVvia Fark]

]]>
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:19:06 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=364834&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Crest Pro-Health Mouthwash: "I Woke Up With Brown Spots On My Teeth" ]]> crestprohealth.jpgReader Monique says that she used Crest Pro-Health Mouthwash and woke up with brown spots on her teeth and no sense of taste. How terrifying!

Crest Pro-Health Mouthwash turned my teeth brown! And on top of that, I can't taste anything! I can't believe this stuff is even on the market. My wisdom teeth are coming in painfully, and I am prepping to get them removed next week. So while at Rite Aid last night, I picked up a bottle of Crest Pro-Health mouthwash. I typically use Listerine, but as I said my wisdom teeth are killing me and this Crest CRAP advertises "No Alcohol". Cool.


Except that after using it for ONE day (in the am and then before bed) I woke up today with brown spots on and in between my teeth and I cannot taste anything at all. After being scared almost to the point of tears, I started googling these symptoms. You wouldn't believe how many website there are that are dedicated to this nonsense. Crest should be sued for this!

More people need to be informed about this. On top of that, if you read the comments on the site I am linking, Crest wont even reimburse you for the lousy 4 dollars you spend on this poison. Never mind the expensive dental bills I am going to face whitening and repairing my teeth. Spread the word Consumerist.

Yikes! We took a look around the internet and found a lot of people complaining about this issue.

Here are some highlights from Amazon.com:

David Case from Flint, MI says:

At the beginning mouthwash was fine. Nice not having the alcohol burn and the breath, that my girlfriend hated. So that was nice.

But after extended use for a month it stained in between my teeth brown. It looked terrible and it cost me a one hundred dollar trip to the dentist to scrape that junk off. The dentist advised that it was my mouthwash after hearing it was this Crest mouthwash that I was using. I was surprised that a mouthwash that is suppose to help clean your teeth actually does the opposite.


Another guy says:
This garbage put dingy yellow and brown stains on my teeth, especially near the gums. A dental cleaning failed to get them off. If I had known this mouthwash could cause stains, I would never have used it in the first place. If my next dental cleaning fails to remove the yellow on my teeth, P&G may have a lawsuit on their hands. It's to the point where I don't want to even talk or smile. These Pro Health products should be illegal.

E.Leyden from NY, NY says:
The first thing I noticed was a buildup of white gunk on my tongue. I had just brushed my tongue until it was a nice pink before using the mouthwash, which annoyed me. But it wasn't just gunk — this stuff was solid. It was annoying, but I could live with gunk. I can't live with what else it did, though.

Let me put this as simply as possible: This mouthwash destroys your sense of taste. Not just immediately after you spit it out, (it ruins it then too, since water tasted strange when I had a drink before bed) but the next morning as well. I COVERED my eggs in ketchup, yet the normally puckering taste of a mouthful of ketchup was missing. I ate kiwis, pineapple, apple, tea, and nothing. It was like a mouthful of sawdust, or water, or watery sawdust.

About 12 hours after the rinsing, I finally started to regain some taste. I looked up the "active" ingredient in Crest Pro-Health online, called cetylpyridinium chloride. This is what the Materials Safety and Data Sheet has to say about this ingredient: "Toxic if swallowed. Very toxic by inhalation. May cause severe eye irritation. Respiratory and skin irritant," with a large TOXIC warning at the top of the page. I'm sure the concentration in this product is low enough to be harmless in a single dose, but imagine years of using this? Hopefully this won't be on the market long enough for that to be possible.


Joseph Adams says:

This is easily the most disturbing thing I've ever had happen to me. I've never had side-effects like this from ANY over the counter medicine, much less an oral product. My bottom teeth now have visible brown spots between them and I'm worried that they won't come off (or that it'll cost me a lot of money to remove them). I don't think I've ever felt so screwed over like this before... this is simply inexcusable. Crest should not be allowed to have a product like this on the market without a huge sticker warning you about its side-effects.

Sadly I don't think people will see this, and they too will get brown garbage in between their teeth. No one googles or looks up mouth wash on Amazon, though I sure wish I did now...

Has this happened to you?

Crest Pro-Health Rinse [Amazon]
Healthy, Beautiful Smiles for Life [Ask Metafilter]
Top Oral Health Products Under $20: Crest Pro-Health Rinse (Read the comments) [Associated Content)

]]>
Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:14:45 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=363684&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Gorton's Recalls Fish After Consumer Finds Pills Inside ]]> gortons.jpgGorton's has issued a recall of some frozen fish fillets after they confirmed that a consumer found pills inside the product.
From the Philadelphia Inquirer:
Gorton's said it ordered the recall as a precaution while a laboratory conducts tests to determine the nature of the pills. Those tests should be complete early next week.

"Obviously product alteration is a very serious matter," said Jud Reis, vice president of marketing for the Gloucester, Mass., company. "We are conducting a full investigation into the source of the problem."

The recall is for Gorton's Six Crispy Battered Fish Fillets weighing 11.4 ounces. The UPC is 44400157770, with a date code of 7289G1 and a best-if-used-by date of April 2009. The fish also was sent to Alabama, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas. Consumers who purchased the fish may call Gorton's at 800-896-9479.

The family that found the pills inside their fish did not become ill, but the FBI and FDA are now investigating the incident.
Southern Regional Police Chief James Childs said that, on Friday, he received a call from the FBI and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

"They have become the lead investigators," Childs said.

Childs forwarded them copies of his department's report on how Tracy Rowan and her daughter found items they believed were pills inside two Gorton's fish fillets they were eating on Feb. 24.

Rowan's son, who was also eating a fillet, tasted something hard and bitter and spit it out, Rowan said.

Scary! If this had happened to us, we would not have behaved rationally. Someone would have had to clock us over the head with a frying pan and drag us off to be checked out by the hospital.

Fish recalled after Pa. woman finds pills in it [Philadelphia Inquirer]
Feds take pill-in-fillet case [Evening Sun]

]]>
Mon, 03 Mar 2008 08:39:32 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=362855&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Proposed "MicroHoo" Merger Has Privacy Implications ]]> microhoo.jpgHow much should one company know about you? Forbes has an interesting article that examines the privacy implications of a Microsoft/Yahoo! merger. They're not pretty:
Microsoft has been trying to make Google seem like a threat to privacy, when in fact it's both of them," says Jeff Chester, the executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy (CDD). "We may now have two companies that will rival the National Security Agency in their ability to compile detailed profiles of users wherever they go online."

The House of Representatives' Judiciary Committee has already scheduled a hearing for this Friday on "The State of Competition on the Internet." If the deal goes through, the Senate's antitrust subcommittee would be likely to hold hearings as well

If Microsoft succeeded in acquiring Yahoo!, Chester argues, the software giant would be buying the e-mail, instant messaging and search information of hundreds of millions of Web users. Added to Microsoft's own Web properties, a "MicroHoo" merger would host 80.1% of the Web's traffic to e-mail services and 27.8% of users' Web searches according to the most recent data from the Web measurement firm, Hitwise.

That much information, says the Center for Democracy and Technology's (CDT) director Leslie Harris, raises the potential for detailed profiles that could fall into the hands of third parties. "When companies with all of these services merge, it dramatically increases the amount of data that can be brought together or shared," she says.

Neither company has an awesome reputation for safeguarding their user's data:
In an ACLU lawsuit seeking to overturn a child pornography law in January of last year, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! were subpoenaed to release search queries. Microsoft and Yahoo! both released some data to the government, while Google fought the court order based on trade secrecy claims and won. In 2004, Yahoo! also revealed the search data of dissident Chinese journalist Shi Tao to the Chinese government, a decision that resulted in Shi's being sentenced to 10 years in prison.

What 'MicroHoo' Would Know About You [Forbes]

]]>
Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:31:04 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=352854&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Do Safety Inspectors And Airlines Have A Dangerous Conflict Of Interest? ]]> nwaclose.jpgBusinessWeek has an article that shines some light on a conflict of interest between the airlines and the FAA safety inspectors. It's the inspector's job to make sure the airlines are operating safely—but inspectors who blow the whistle may face pressure from the airlines and retaliation from the FAA's upper management
The inspectors are the on-the-ground cops who ensure that engines fire up properly, that the wing flaps function, and that all of the other complex machinery in an aircraft is in good working order. They have broad discretion to halt and delay flights—power that often rankles the thinly stretched, financially strapped carriers. When an inspector launches a formal investigation into an apparent safety violation at a passenger airline, something that happened more than 200 times last year, it often triggers costly repairs. And when the bill exceeds $50,000, the FAA must issue a press release alerting the world to the problem.

The airlines sometimes fight back. Executives meet constantly with local FAA officials on a wide variety of issues and occasionally lodge informal complaints against tough inspectors. From time to time, the carriers bring their concerns directly to the agency's top official: the FAA administrator. "If the airline feels uncomfortable, management will call the FAA administrator," says Linda Goodrich, a former inspector who is now vice-president of the Professional Airways Systems Specialists (PASS) union, which represents inspectors and played no role in Lund's dispute with the agency. "The FAA administrator will immediately demand to know what we are doing to them. You can imagine an inspector trying to do his work when his local management is so fearful of the airline."

Several safety inspectors told BusinessWeek that they had also experienced or witnessed retaliation. (Most of the safety inspectors interviewed by BusinessWeek did not want to be identified by name in this article for that reason.)

The article details the case of one inspector, Mark Lund, who claims he was given a desk job as punishment for pointing out serious safety problems at Northwest Airlines during the 2005 mechanics strike.
On Aug. 21 Lund worked late into the night drafting a nine-page memo that described his observations of 10 separate maintenance mistakes. Besides advocating a cutback in Northwest's flight schedule, he proposed upgrading its mechanic-training program and increasing FAA surveillance of the carrier. The next day, Lund says, his direct supervisor got a call from a higher-level manager ordering Lund to be barred from inspecting Northwest planes. Then the carrier fired off the letter of complaint against Lund, according to the IG report. It said Northwest "would no longer permit [Lund] to have unescorted access to Northwest facilities." In response, the FAA decided to stop him from conducting on-site inspections altogether
Scary.

Airline Safety: A Whistleblower's Tale [BusinessWeek]
(Photo:ZonaPhoto)

]]>
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:59:22 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=351229&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ MedFICO In Development, It's FICO For Patients! ]]> scarycorridor.jpgFrom the folks that brought you the credit score system in all it's glory, here's MedFICO! It's a new business project underway with the goal of assessing patient's ability to pay their medical bills. The system would gather patient's bill payment history from hospitals around the country and then assign patients a score similar to a credit score. Critics are worried if the same problems with people getting erroneous information in their credit report and then having an insanely difficult time cleaning it up would also affect MedFICO. They also worry whether hospitals would use MedFICO to determine the level of care offered, like whether the person gets a hospital stay or not. FICO scores are now being used by some employers to screen out potential employees, would they use MedFICO to see who might take a bigger chunk out of the health benefits?

The Doctor Will See Your Credit Now [The Red Tape Chronicles]
Medical industry plans to rate payment history [Chicago Tribune]
(Photo: yosoyjulito)

]]>
Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:58:25 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=346422&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Researches Claim To Reverse Netflix's Anonymization ]]> Researchers from Department of Computer Sciences at the University of Texas at Austin say they can reverse Netflix's anonymous data (which was released in to the public as part of a contest to see if someone could design a better rating system) by comparing it to only a few ratings on IMDb. The result? Specific users can be identified and linked to their (ostensibly) private ratings.

Releasing the data and just removing the names does nothing for privacy," Shmatikov told SecurityFocus. "If you know their name and a few records, then you can identify that person in the other (private) database."

While Netflix's dataset did not include names, instead using an anonymous identifier for each user, the collection of movie ratings — combined with a public database of ratings — is enough to identify the people, the researchers argued in a paper published soon after Netflix released the data, but which only recently came to light. Narayanan and Shmatikov demonstrated the danger by using public reviews published by a "few dozen" people in the Internet Movie Database (IMDb) to identify movie ratings of two of the users in Netflix's data.

Exposing movie ratings that the reviewer thought were private could expose significant details about the person. For example, the researchers found that one of the people had strong — ostensibly private — opinions about some liberal and gay-themed films and also had ratings for some religious films.

More generally, the research demonstrated that information that a person believes to be benign could be used to identify them in other private databases.

Scary, scary, scary, scary, scary.

From the research paper:

Does privacy of Netflix ratings matter? The privacy question is not "Does the average Netflix subscriber
care about the privacy of his movie viewing history?," but "Are there any Netflix subscribers whose privacy
can be compromised by analyzing the Netflix Prize dataset?" The answer to the latter question is, undoubtedly,
yes. As shown by our experiments with cross-correlating non-anonymous records from the Internet Movie Database with anonymized Netflix records (see below), it is possible to learn sensitive non-public information about a person's political or even sexual preferences. We assert that even if the vast majority of Netflix subscribers did not care about the privacy of their movie ratings (which is not obvious by any means), our analysis would still indicate serious privacy issues with the Netflix Prize dataset.

Researchers reverse Netflix anonymization [SecurityFocus] (Thanks, Scott!)
How To Break Anonymity Of Netflix Prize Dataset [ARXIV]
(Photo:Maulleigh)

]]>
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:51:06 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=345219&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Judge Dismisses Class Action Lawsuit Against Overstock.com Due To Mandatory Binding Arbitration Clause ]]> Did you know that every time you purchase something from Overstock.com you agree to a mandatory binding arbitration clause and have no legal recourse against the company? Even if they illegally disclose too much of your information on your receipt?

From the Madison County Record:

Shandie Deaton filed the suit Sept. 18, 2007, one month after she made a purchase on Overstock.com. She alleged her receipt violated FCRA.

The act was passed in 2003 and provides that anyone accepting credit or debit cards may not print more than the last five digits of the card number or the expiration date upon any receipt provided to the cardholder at the point of sale or transaction.

Credit card machines put into use after Jan. 1, 2005, required immediate compliance with FCRA. Machines in use before Jan. 1, 2005, were required to be in compliance by Dec. 4, 2006.

Deaton claimed Overstock.com violated FCRA by printing the expiration date and/or printed more than the last five digits of class members' credit card or debit card numbers on the receipts provided at the point of a sale or transaction between Overstock.com and the class members.

"Overstock.com' violations were not the product of an accident or an isolated oversight," the complaint stated. "Rather, Overstock.com knowingly and intentionally continued to use Devices which were not programmed to, or otherwise did not, comply..."

The lawsuit asked for monetary relief of no less than $100 and no more than $1,000 for each violation. Overstock filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that its customers agreed to mandatory binding arbitration by purchasing something from their website.
According to Overstock, customers can freely access their website, however when placing an order, they must agree to the website's terms and conditions before they can continue.

"Any dispute relating in any way to your visit to the Site or to products you purchase through the Site shall be submitted to confidential arbitration in Salt Lake City, Utah," a portion of Overstock's terms and conditions reads.

"To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, no Arbitration under this agreement shall be joined to an arbitration involving any other party subject to this Agreement, whether through class arbitration proceedings or otherwise."

The judge ruled in favor of Overstock and dismissed the case. "Accordingly, the Court cannot conclude that arbitration of this action is prohibitively expensive," Gilbert wrote. "Therefore, the Court will not invalidate the mandatory arbitration clause based on the theory that forcing Deaton to submit to arbitration would prevent her from vindicating her rights."

We took a look at this arbitration clause and noticed that there's an exception to it. If you even "threaten" to violate Overstock.com's intellectual property rights, they reserve the right to haul you into state or federal court in the state of Utah. What a piece of work.


Arbitration, not litigation: Judge dismisses federal class action v. Overstock.com
[Madison County Record] (Thanks, Shelley!)
Overstock.com Terms & Conditions


]]>
Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:30:02 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=343672&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Will The Foreclosure Tsunami Lead To An Arson Boom? ]]> Here's a scary thought. The subprime meltdown and its resulting tsunami of foreclosures may lead to a boom in arson, says Fortune magazine:

Faced with foreclosure on her Russellville, Indiana home, Christina Snyder allegedly concocted the kind of plan that now has insurance executives on edge.

According to the county prosecutor, the 31-year-old Snyder allegedly offered to pay a neighbor $5,000 to help her burn down her house and make it look like a botched rape attempt - all in order to claim $80,000 in insurance money. Snyder wanted the neighbor to bind her hands in duct tape, write "whore" on her shirt, and then help her escape once the blaze was set, the prosecutor says. The neighbor demurred, instead reporting Snyder to police.

With the national foreclosure rate zooming and the real estate market in a two-year funk, the insurance industry fears more homeowners will see arson as a way out of their financial woes. A recent report by the industry-funded Coalition Against Insurance Fraud notes that with "untold thousands of homeowners struggling with ballooning subprime mortgage payments, fraud fighters are watching closely for a spike in arsons by desperate homeowners who can no longer afford their home payments."

Oh, fantastic. That's just what we need. Can't pay your mortgage payments? Just "burn the m—--f—-- down." Wait, no. That's a terrible idea.

And just because we can, here's a clip from Harold & Kumar. (NSFW, audio) We hope this Burger Shack employee doesn't have a ARM.

Will foreclosures spark an arson boom? [CNNMoney] (Thanks, Robert!)
(Photo:The Joy of the Mundane)

]]>
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:18:12 EST http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=343396&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Get $10 For Ratting On Your Denny's Server? ]]> John writes:

Notice this remarkable "offer" at the bottom of the receipt from Denny's Restaurant:

"If we forget to charge you for any item you received, we are sorry. Please notify the manager and that item will be free. Also, for your help, we will give you a $10.00 gift card to use on your next visit to Denny's. Thank you."

In other words, if some poor server forgot to list something you ate on your check, you can either let it go, or you can report the guilty party to management and still not have to pay for the food (and you get a ten-dollar reward for fingering the guilty party).

Is it just us or does this read like some kind of bounty? We're not smart enough to know what the scam is, but heaven help the poor server who gets caught running it at that Denny's.

Feel free to enlighten us in the comments.

]]>
Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:58:39 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=339554&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Subprime Meltdown Is The Tip Of The Credit Iceberg ]]> The ongoing subprime meltdown is merely the first destructive wave of credit catastrophe to wash over Wall Street, according to Slate's resident explainer. Americans drunkenly bandy credit around in several forms: mortgages are the most prevalent loans turning sour, but credit card debt, student loans, and auto loans are silently conspiring to threaten our macroeconomic well-being.

Other types of consumer debt, which have nothing to do with housing and nothing to do with subprime, are going bad, too. The Wall Street Journal reported today that "about 4.5% of auto loans made in 2006 to top-rated borrowers were at least 30 days delinquent as of the end of September, up from 2.9% the previous month, according to a Lehman Brothers survey of companies servicing these loans." In October, Fortune's Peter Gumble warned that a similar plague may soon afflict credit-card companies. In October, credit-card giant Capital One Financial reported that the delinquency rate on credit cards for the third quarter of 2007 was 4.46 percent, up from 3.53 percent in the third quarter of 2006. "Given current loan growth and delinquency trends," Capital One reported, it "expects the U.S. Card charge-off rate to be around 5.25 percent in the fourth quarter."

The stock of First Marblehead, which has enjoyed explosive growth making private (i.e., not federally guaranteed) student loans, has been hammered in recent days because Moody's, the ratings agency, concluded that loans it had made "appear to be defaulting at a significantly higher rate compared to loans originated through school financial aid offices." The Wall Street Journal reported that "seventeen months after First Marblehead arranged one 2005 package of student loans, 2% had defaulted, according to the company's monthly reports to note holders. But last month, a comparable 2006 package—also 17 months after issue—had a default rate of 3.98%."

So what does all this mean to you? The imploding subprime market is already driving up the price of consumer credit—loans of all stripes are more expensive—but things could potentially get much worse. Somewhere between "manageable bad" and "let's all walk to California and write about the Dust Bowl" bad. If we had the means, we'd come up with catchy colored Livestrong-y "My Debt Is Under Control!" tchotchkes. But since we don't, we'll simply beg: please use your credit responsibly.

Debt Be Not Proud [Slate]
FURTHER READING: The Grapes Of Wrath [Amazon]
(Photo: Wikipedia)

]]>
Sun, 09 Dec 2007 09:45:35 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=331105&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ FAA: Southwest Engine Experienced Vibration. Passengers: The Engine Exploded! ]]> According to the FAA, Southwest flight 438 returned to Dallas' Love Field on November 17 when the plane "experienced a vibration in the number 2 engine" shortly after take-off. According to passengers on the flight, the plane flew for thirty minutes before the right engine experienced "fatal engine failure."

The discrepancy is raising a few eyebrows over at FlightStory. One passenger writes:

It was not during takeoff. There was alot of damage. There was no vibration. It doesnt say anything about an uncontained explosion at 25,000ft. I was sitting on that engine watching it happen with my own two eyes. The fan blades shot out towards the plane leaving holes on the engine cowlings and a huge hole on th other side.There was no vibration, but a huge explosion. That report is false and they should really clean it up! The blades could have easily penatrated the fusalage causing a crash, or went through and killed a passenger.
Another explains in harrowing detail:
We all thought we were going to die! We said our goodbyes. There was an explosion and holes in the right engine with something sharp still sticking out of the engine. The plane started shaking so bad. The flight attendant was crying and one was getting oxygen because she was hyperventilating. They were able to turn the flight around and land with no incident but not before the longest 20 minutes back to the ground and the plane being surrounded by firetrucks. A big chunk of the engine flew off and luckily it went away from the aircraft because if it came toward us, we wouldn't be here. The chunk was on the outer side of the engine not seen from our view but could be seen while walking off the aircraft. There were smaller holes though in our view of the top of the engine. I saw the pilots taking photos when we made it to the ground so hopefully the FAA will do the right thing and investigate how this could happen.
Regardless of which account is accurate, it is still impressive that Southwest's pilots managed to safely land their wounded plane. The NTSB has launched an investigation.

Follow-up - Southwest Engine Failure [FlightStory]

]]>
Sat, 01 Dec 2007 13:43:30 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=328866&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Site Of Most Infamous Mob Murder In NY History Is Now A Starbucks ]]> mob.jpgThe site of the most infamous mob murder in New York City history is now a Starbucks, but does anyone care? Nah. We certainly don't care... but it's a chance to learn about a mob murder:

From AMNewYork:

Albert Anastasia, the powerful leader of Murder Inc., a man believed to be have personally killed 36 people, stopped in what was then a barber shop in the Park Sheraton Hotel's lobby on West 57th Street. As he dozed in the chair, two gunmen walked in and fired a barrage of lead into the crime boss.

Meyer Berger, who covered the murder for the New York Times, wrote at the time, "Anastasia fell to the floor ... One pudgy hand was outstretched. The fluorescent lights kicked fire from the diamonds in his fat finger ring. He lay still."

The murderers were never caught.

It is difficult today to stand on tiled floor of the Starbucks and imagine the pool of blood where the man nicknamed "The Executioner" once lay.

Now people sip 750 calorie fraps while they type poetry on computers at the very spot where a mass murder was murdered.

"You think people care?" says one barista, out on a smoke break and checking her Sidekick, and who, as per company policy, would not give her name. "That was 50 years ago. Trust me. They just want their coffee and they want to get on their way."

Infamous mob murder site now a Starbucks [AMNY via Starbucks Gossip]

]]>
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:43:49 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=315891&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Man Attempts To Return Walmart Ammunition At 1300 Feet Per Second ]]> It's Walmart's policy, clearly visible on their website and in their stores, that all sales of guns and ammunition are final. One San Diego man didn't like that policy so he tried to return the ammunition in another way. By firing it in the Walmart parking lot.

According to the Union-Tribune in San Diego, a man tried to return shotgun ammunition to his local Walmart. After he was refused he became enraged and told the employees he would be back to kill them all.

Then the man fired off some shots in the Walmart parking lot. No one was hurt, but witnesses were able to write down the man's license plate number and police located him at his home.

The San Diego SWAT team surrounded the man's mobile home and eventually had to use tear gas to get him to surrender after an 8 hour standoff.

Sorry, scary gun guy. Walmart's return policy on guns and ammo is clear: All sales are final. It pays to read the signs.

Santee SWAT standoff ends with arrest [Union-Tribune] (Thanks, jpac!)
(Photo:crawfishpie)

]]>
Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:29:24 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=298101&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ GoogleMaps Mashup Of Minneapolis Foreclosures ]]> A googlemaps mashup of 2007 foreclosures to-date in Minneapolis area puts the acceleration in failed mortgages into a different perspective.

Twin Cities Foreclosures [Star Tribune via Caveat Emptor]

]]>
Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:45:59 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=274929&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Hewlett-Packard Is Listening ]]> In their January issue Harper's published excerpts from "emails and other documents related to Project Kona II, a surveillance operation run by private investigators hired by Hewlett-Packard last January to identify a source of leaks of confidential HP information to the press." As a part of the program, HP obtained phone records under false pretenses and spied on reporters from New York Times, BusinessWeek, the Wall Street Journal, and CNET News:

FROM: KEVIN HUNSAKER

Hi guys, If/when we put the tracer in an email to the reporter, is there any chance it will be discovered? Is it something a firewall could pick up, or antivirus software? Would it make it through HP's security and get to, say, my email? If CNET knows something like that was sent to them, we could end up with some seriously bad publicity.

FROM: RON DELIA

Team, Surveillance teams were in place from 9 a.m. to noon, and no activity was observed at either residence. It appears DK has not returned from vacation. We waited in the event the family was sleeping in. However, by noon the newspapers were not picked up from the driveway. A pretext call to the residence was not answered. Surveillance activity at GK's residence revealed no movement as well.

If this is how they treat reporters imagine how they treat their customers. —MEGHANN MARCO

Every Word You Say [Harper's]
(Photo: Sister72)

]]>
Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:57:18 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=243529&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Repair Your Credit By Disputing ]]> Reader and blogger DDL sends in a story about a "friend named Max" and his successful credit repair strategy. Max raised his credit score 100 points by employing the following technique:

Then, one day, Max read the provisions of the Fair Credit in Reporting Act (FCRA). The FCRA (in so many words) dictates that every person has the right to dispute the accuracy or validity of any item on their credit report with the three credit reporting bureaus (Equifax, Experian, and Transunion). From the date that each bureau receives notice of the dispute, the bureau has 30 days to investigate the dispute. If, at the conclusion of 30 days, if the bureau cannot verify the accuracy of the information in that person's credit report, or the investigation just doesn't get completed in time, the offending item is automatically deleted. Gone. Done. Case closed.
...
Max started his journey with a credit score in the low 500s, and now, in a matter of months, it had crested above 600. Eventually, and through great discipline, Max managed to eliminate every negative item on his credit report, simply by asking for proof that they belonged there in the first place.

As a result, Max's credit score improved to the point where he was able to buy a new car and move into his first house. Before losing contact with Max, I could tell that he had learned from the foolish mistakes of his youth and appreciated the opportunity to reboot his credit history.

Well, what do you know? Apparently no matter how large a scary beetle on your credit is, you can squash it. Well. You can try..—MEGHANN MARCO

How to Lawfully Reset Your Credit History [Make Your Nut]
(Photo: metavariable)

]]>
Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:47:28 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=237119&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ RIAA Tries To Avoid Paying Expensive Lawyers By Bullying ISPs ]]> Hey, RIAA...we do the ISP bullying around here! Those lovable rascals that form the music monopoly we all know and love have decided to scale back their lawsuit program and concentrate on bullying your ISP into forwarding you a settlement offer and possibly turning over your logs. From Slashdot:

"The RIAA has sent out a letter to the ISPs telling them to stop making mistakes in identifying subscribers, and offering a 'Pre-Doe settlement option' — with a discount of '$1000 or more' — to their subscribers, if and only if the ISP agrees to preserve its logs for 180 days. Other interesting points in the letter (PDF): the RIAA will be launching a web site for 'early settlements,' www.p2plawsuits.com"
That's cool, just bypass the legal system with a scary letter and a website. ISPs aren't going to fall for this, are they? Comcast? Verizon? Are you there? —MEGHANN MARCO

RIAA Admits ISPs Have Misidentified "John Does" [Slashdot via Gizmodo]

]]>
Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:34:12 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=236789&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Brain Scans Predict If You'll Buy Something ]]> According to an article on Reuters, brain scans can predict if consumers are going to buy something or not:

When people see something they want to purchase, a portion of the brain called the nucleus accumbens "lights up" on a brain scan. If the price is too high, another region of the brain called the insula is activated and the mesial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) is deactivated, Dr. Brian Knutson of Stanford University in California and colleagues report.

Based on the activation and deactivation of these regions, Knutson and his team were able to predict whether or not people would purchase something before they were conscience of making a decision.

Cue the scary sci-fi music. —MEGHANN MARCO

Brain scans predict shoppers' purchasing choices [Yahoo! via BoingBoing]

]]>
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:55:01 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=228095&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ FDA Expected to OK Cloned Meat ]]> Is cloned meat safe? The government seems to think so. According to the Seattle Times, "A long-awaited study by federal scientists concludes meat and milk from cloned animals and their offspring are safe to eat and should be allowed to enter the food supply without special labeling."

"All of the studies indicate that the composition of meat and milk from clones is within the compositional ranges of meat and milk consumed in the U.S.," the FDA scientists concluded in a report published in the Jan. 1 issue of the journal Theriogenology." Farmers have cloned animals for meat and milk, but voluntarily kept them off the shelves. —MEGHANN MARCO

FDA expected to OK cloned products [Seattle Times]

]]>
Tue, 26 Dec 2006 09:25:47 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=224146&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Like, Cingular Friends MySpace ]]> According to Reuters, Cingular has cut a deal to offer MySpace on almost all of its cell phones. For a measly $2.99 a month, people not old enough to have cell phones, let alone MySpace profiles, can update photos, check MySpace messages, and update their blogs...all from their phones! It looks like the holidays have come early for internet predators!—MEGHANN MARCO

Cingular to offer MySpace on cellphones [Reuters]

]]>
Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:59:07 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=222771&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Military Not Allowed To Test On Civilians ]]> Consumer news from Washington: The Navy will not be allowed to test a new "blood substitute" (derived from cow's blood) on 1,000 some civilian trauma victims without their consent. From MSNBC:

The development and testing of experimental blood substitutes has been fraught with controversy: Baxter International Inc. stopped research on one such product in 1998 when more than 20 patients given the substitute died.

A second company, Northfield Laboratories Inc., began clinical trials in 2004 of another product, called Polyheme, giving it to trauma patients without their consent on the way to — and later, at — the hospital. Hemopure would be given only en route to the hospital under the Navy proposal.


A Navy official said the blood substitute could save lives on the battlefield in places like Iraq. So why don't they test it there? "The Navy wants to test Hemopure in the civilian world because the battlefield is too uncontrolled an environment. "—MEGHANN MARCO (Thanks, Kristin)

Blood substitute too risky to test, panel says [MSNBC]

]]>
Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:39:30 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=222243&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Eat A BK Octawhopper ]]> The Burger King eat like a snake guy has nothing on this kid who eats eight slabs of meatburger.

Without benefit of CGI.

]]>
Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:37:25 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=206811&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Happy Day of Labor! ]]> knightsoflabor.jpgToday is a bank holiday for the Gawker Media Network but that doesn't mean that the fickle wheel of commerce stops keep spinning round. Here's some updates on consumer's stories we reported on last week.

• ConsumerAvenger (going in the comments as The Cultural Icon) reports that she did finally receive a NEW motorola RAZR, just as she asked for. "I'm still planning on turning over creation because of what I've been through but at least people can call me," she says.

• We wanted to know whatever happened with Andrew W and the creepy Comcast tech but he hasn't responded to our followup inquest. Don't leave us hanging!

• Dan says TWC has continued to be helpful and the next step is to get his roommate to give a description of the tech who showed up to his house unannounced. That's proving difficult because his roommate is never home, never answers his phone or responds to his messages, and is in general, a useless schmuck.

]]>
Mon, 04 Sep 2006 11:11:14 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=198355&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ UPDATE: Time Warner Pays Inexplicable House Call ]]> karlhungus.jpgDan Edelman gives us an exciting update on the mysterious, TWC tech that visited his house two days ago, without notice and for no apparent reason.

His turboed executive customer service call (which we helped him achieve, thank you very much), went from Terri (customer care advocate), to Barry Rosenblum (Executive Vice President, Operations, Northeast Region) to Tom Allen (V.P. of TWC security of NY and NJ).

Allen said he's opening a case on the situation. More than just looking at job numbers, he can cross reference assigned techs and territory and see if someone was out of place. Edelman say Allen gave him his personal line and "was really nice and helpful."

Adding, "I think at that level they realize the seriousness of it...the possible lawsuitiness."

Dan had to run off to a lunch meeting and promises more details later. While we wait for him to finish his pastrami, read our full IM convo inside.

edelman1.jpg

edelman2.jpg

]]>
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:58:47 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=196405&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Time Warner Pays Inexplicable House Call, Consumerist Helps ]]> karlhungus.jpgDan Edelman, a loyal Consumerist reader, was shocked to hear a Time Warner Cable tech visited his apartment yesterday. Odder than the difficulty in getting one to show up in the first place was that the tech wasn't asked for. No service call was put in. His cheetos slathered roommate let the guy in without an explanation. The tech puttered around for 20 minutes and left.

When Edelman (pictured) heard about this, he raced home to find out if anything was stolen. Upon inspection, nothing seemed amiss, but the mystery remained. What was this guy doing there?

There's two possibilities we can think of:
1) A TWC tech has gone buckwild.
2) Someone in Park Slope is impersonating a TWC tech and casing people's joints.

To find out, Edelman began questioning Time Warner customer service. They were no help, so he started IMing us with advice for how to conduct his calls. We walk him through, live...

Follow along our exciting IM journey, inside!

homeinvasion1.jpg

homeinvasion2mod.jpg

Stay tuned for the next installment in this scintillating true customer service crime!

]]>
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:16:19 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=196109&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ HOWTO: Blow Up Airplanes With Liquids ]]> How feasible was it for terrorists to mix together a few common chemicals into a big sky kablooie? People far smarter than us investigate. (Thanks to Caitlin!)

Once the plane is over the ocean, very discreetly bring all of your gear into the toilet...put a beaker containing the peroxide / acetone mixture into the ice water bath, and start adding the acid, drop by drop, while stirring constantly.

After a few hours - assuming, by some miracle, that the fumes haven't overcome you or alerted passengers or the flight crew to your activities - you'll have a quantity of TATP with which to carry out your mission. Now all you need to do is dry it for an hour or two.

Just don't accidentally bump the call button while you're puttering around.

"Mass murder in the skies: was the plot feasible?" [The Register]

]]>
Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:35:54 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=195221&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Study Reveals Poison Pill Among Hospital Prescriptions ]]> A new study analyzing hospital prescriptions shows startling and potentially deadly trends.

• On average, a patient is subject to one medication gaffe every day.
• 1.5 million Americans get sick, hurt or are killed by prescription errors.
• 25% of these are preventable.

The study advised hospitals to switching to electronically written prescriptions, use bar codes and develop integrated, compatible prescription systems between hospitals, doctors and pharmacies.

Furthermore, patients need to be proactive in learning about the drugs they're prescribed, why, and the recommended dosage.

You don't want your obituary to read, "Killed By Bad Handwriting."

"Medication Errors Injure More Than 1.5 million Yearly, Study Finds" [CNN]

]]>
Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:49:56 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=189704&view=rss&microfeed=true