<![CDATA[Consumerist: Public Health]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Public Health]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/public health http://consumerist.com/tag/public health <![CDATA[ POLL: Does The Current Drinking Age Limit Actually <em>Encourage</em> Binge Drinking? ]]> A new campaign arguing that the 21-year-old drinking age is not working, and that it "has created a culture of dangerous binge drinking" on college campuses has been signed by an eclectic group of over 100 college presidents, including those of Duke, Dartmouth, The Ohio State University, and Johns Hopkins.

From the Wall Street Journal:

John McCardell, a history professor and former president of Middlebury College in Vermont, is leading the effort. His group, Choose Responsibility, a nonprofit unaffiliated with the college, has received financial backing from money manger Julian Robertson. Mr. McCardell says he receives no money from the alcohol industry.

He argues current laws drive drinking underground, causing more problems than they solve. "The law is out of step with reality," he says. "The law is so obviously unjust and discriminatory. It ought to at least be the subject of debate."

But he and the college presidents are taking on powerful constituencies, including some of their colleagues, the top government traffic-safety agency, the insurance industry and public-health authorities, all of which say the higher drinking age saves lives. Even representatives of the alcohol industry say they support current laws.

A college student interviewed for the piece says she cut back on her drinking once it was no longer forbidden:

Elizabeth Pogust, a 21-year-old senior at Middlebury, says she felt pressured to drink as a freshman. Classmates would quaff alcohol in their rooms before roaming the campus on weekends, she recalls. As they got older, she says, she and her peers learned their lessons. "I've noticed a definite change in my attitude once it was no longer forbidden," she says.

What do you think? Is the 21-year-old drinking age part of the problem — or the solution?



Bid to Reconsider Drinking Age Taps Unlikely Supporters
[WSJ]
List of College Presidents Who Signed The Petition [Amethyst Initiative]

]]>
Consumerist-5039874 Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:59:30 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5039874&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ FDA Declares Bisphenol A Safe ]]> Bisphenol A, or BPA, is the chemical used in various plastic bottles and can linings that Canada recently banned, consumers in Arkansas, California, and Ohio have filed lawsuits over, and Playtex and Nalgene have stopped using. The fear is that it's toxic—studies on animals in Canada have shown that it's damaging, and some tests in the U.S. suggest it's harmful to humans as well. Critics of the anti-BPA movement point out that the human studies rely on super high dosages that never occur in real life, and that making safety decisions based on the general public's fears isn't exactly scientific.

Now—right before California decides whether to ban BPA in children's products—the FDA has revisited its earlier studies and reaffirmed that "the trace amounts of bisphenol A that leach out of food containers are not a threat to infants or adults."

Critics are saying the FDA is cherry-picking what studies to consider in its decision:

"It's ironic FDA would choose to ignore dozens of studies funded by (the National Institutes of Health) — this country's best scientists — and instead rely on flawed studies from industry," said Pete Myers, chief scientist for Environmental Health Sciences.

Myers said the agency disregarded recent studies of bisphenol's effects included in the National Toxicology Program's April draft report.

That group's review of animal studies suggested low doses of bisphenol can cause changes in behavior and the brain, and that it may reduce survival and birth weight in fetuses. A final version of the group's findings is expected next month.

Commenting on those studies in its 105-page assessment, the FDA said they had "inconsistencies and inadequacies which limit the interpretations of the findings."

We're not sure what sort of effect this will have on the pending lawsuits or on California's potential ban, but the BPA debate should take on new energy next month, when the National Toxicology Program's final report is released and the FDA brings in outside "advisors" to debate its own findings.

"FDA says chemical found in plastic bottles is safe" [Associated Press]
(Photo: Oop)

]]>
Consumerist-5037772 Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:34:27 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5037772&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Closed: Too Much Rodent Poo At This Chicago Whole Foods ]]> Over 100 rodent droppings in one cooler alone is too many, says the Chicago Department of Public Heath... and so the Lincoln Park Whole Foods has been closed until the management can eliminate the infestation. Ick.

The Chicago Tribune says:

We have another walk-through tomorrow morning, and obviously we’re working around the clock," Kate Klotz, Whole Foods' Midwest regional public relations specialist, told The Stew on Thursday. Klotz said they hope to have the store re-opened by tomorrow afternoon but that's not definite.

The inspection that resulted in the closing was a follow-up inspection. Inspectors found mouse feces all over the premises as well as a dead mouse on a glueboard trap.

Mice, supermarkets and food safety [Chicago Tribune](Thanks, Dena!)

]]>
Consumerist-5023930 Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:34:59 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023930&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ There Are Bed Bugs On The Subway Benches. Yes, Really. ]]> Bedbugs are usually thought of as something that only hotel guests have to worry about, but apparently New Yorkers who like to sit on benches while they wait for the subway should be concerned about the bloodsuckers as well.

The NYPost says:

At a recent Department of Housing, Preservation and Development forum on the subject, a city bedbug educator admitted to seeing the pests on benches in subway stations - in one case, catching a ride on an unsuspecting straphanger's caboose at Brooklyn's Hoyt-Schermerhorn station, according to people at the meeting.

The official, identified as Edward Brownbear, also reported seeing the bugs on wooden benches at the Union Square and Fordham Road stations in Manhattan and The Bronx, respectively.

Well, ew. Kind of makes you appreciate those frigid outdoor comparatively-pestilence-free Chicago L platforms. Sorta.

SUBWAYS' BLOOD-BUG INVASION [NYP]

]]>
Consumerist-5008942 Wed, 14 May 2008 14:03:22 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5008942&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "$25,000 Dessert" Restaurant Closed Due To Cockroaches, Sewage, Mouse Droppings, Fly Infestations ]]> New York's famous Serendipity 3 restaurant, home of the world's most expensive dessert (the $25,000 "Frrozen Haute Chocolate"), has been shut down by the New York City Health Department after the restaurant failed two health inspections in a month.

The department says that inspectors found hundreds of live cockroaches, mouse droppings, fly infestations, and an improperly functioning sewage system. Delicious!


Department officials tell CBS 2 that both inspections revealed "rodent and fly infestation and conditions conducive to pest infestation, including stagnant water in the basement."

The plumbing was reportedly so out of line that the "sewage disposal system [was] in disrepair or not functioning properly."

On Wednesday night, the store, which has been featured in numerous Hollywood films, apparently kept open its wild zoo of filth for inspectors. The Department says the inspector came upon a live mouse, more than 100 live cockroaches, fruit flies, house flies, and piles of mouse dropping scattered about the restaurant.

Yummy!

Health Dept. Closes Shop Selling $25,000 Sundae [CBS2] (Thanks, Cigar!)
(Photo:scalleja)

]]>
Consumerist-323263 Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:59:09 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=323263&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Hepatitis A Scare At Calgary McDonald's ]]> Attention residents of Calgary: Anyone who ate at the McDonald's at Foothills Industrial Park, 5326 72 Ave. S.E., across from the Calgary Soccer Centre from Oct. 1 to 23 is at risk for Hepatitis A after a food handler tested positive for the disease.

There are vaccines to prevent infection available to anyone who ate at the location less than 14 days ago. If you've already been vaccinated or had Hepatitis A in the past, you're in the clear.

Hepatitis A isn't life threatening or anything, and people usually recover in a month.

There are potentially thousands of people that would have been at that restaurant over that period of time," Dr. Judy MacDonald (ha, ha, her name is "MacDonald") told the Calgary Sun.

"It's impossible to know the extent of (or) even if people were actually exposed to hepatitis A." Ick.

Thousands exposed to Hep A [Calgary Sun] (Thanks, Vlad!)
(Photo:Morton Fox)

]]>
Consumerist-314982 Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:43:55 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=314982&view=rss&microfeed=true