<![CDATA[Consumerist: Progressive]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Progressive]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/progressive http://consumerist.com/tag/progressive <![CDATA[ Progressive Has No Notion of Christmas Spirit, Announces Yule-tide Rate Increase ]]> According to an Email received by reader Jessica, Progressive Auto Insurance is increasing rates for New York Customers by nearly 20%. And the best time to announce this? Christmas day, of course!

Whats perplexing is the lack of explanation behind the change — the original email cited it simply as 'the cost of doing business in New York'. Jessica attempted to find more out herself, with no luck.

I called to ask if there was a mistake and was told that it was not a mistake, and that everyone in the state will be paying extra. I've never received so much as a parking ticket in my life — there is NO explanation in the e-mail for the increase, either. They just tell you nonchalantly that it's time to renew in x months and your premium is X — so Merry Christmas, NY Progressive customers!

Any ideas on why this could be?

Pic: [The Master Shake Signal]

]]>
Consumerist-5118154 Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:00:00 EST Alex Jarvis http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5118154&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Progressive Responds To Question About Using Recent Military Service To Determine Rates And Eligibility ]]> recentmilitaryservice.jpgThe Progressive auto insurance company saw our post "Why Is Progressive Using "Recent Military Service" To Determine Rates And Eligibility?" and responded to let us know that it's just to make sure that service members aren't penalized for having a lapse in their coverage due to the fact that they've been deployed overseas. They've apologized for the confusing wording on the website and have pledged to rewrite it for clarity. Full official statement, inside...

Cristy writes:

I am from Progressive and would like to respond to your posting titled "Why is Progressive Using 'Recent Military Service' to Determine Rates and Eligibility?"

First, I would like to apologize to Ceaser and anyone else who got the impression that Progressive uses military service to determine rates and eligibility. This is not true, but it's easy to see how Ceaser and others could have gotten that impression based on the language on our Web site.

The reason we would ask about military service is to make sure we are not unfairly charging a higher rate to service men and women who have had a lapse in insurance coverage.

If you've bought car insurance before, you know that most companies offer you a better rate if you have continuous insurance coverage, and it's the same with Progressive. But, someone who is deployed overseas without access to a car does not need insurance, so they may not have it. But we certainly don't want that to hurt them in terms of their rate. So, if a person had a lapse in coverage because they were in the military, we would offer them the same (better) rate they would have gotten if they had had no lapse in coverage. The majority of states require insurers to do this, but we do it voluntarily in all states regardless of whether it's required because it's the right thing to do. Please let me know if this makes sense; if not, I will try to explain it better!

As for the confusing language on our Web site, I'm very sorry about that and we are now in the process of getting it changed. That language is a disclosure about our comparison rating service, where we give you our rates and the rates of some of our competitors. The language is meant to convey that some companies may consider military service in rating, and if they do, it might make the rate we gave you for the other company inaccurate. But unfortunately, the way it's worded, it sounds like we may use recent military service as a reason not to offer insurance, which is not the case.

The last thing we want to do is make anyone in the military feel that we're treating them with anything less than the respect they deserve. We want to make sure we don't charge higher rates to people who don't have continuous car insurance coverage because they were deployed overseas. If you are in the military and have been deployed overseas, please make sure your insurance company or your agent knows this so that you are not penalized for not having continuous car insurance. Thank you for hearing me out, and again, I am sorry for the confusing language that led to this misunderstanding.

Cristy Cote
Progressive Public Relations

PREVIOUSLY: Why Is Progressive Using "Recent Military Service" To Determine Rates And Eligibility?

]]>
Consumerist-382732 Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:22:54 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382732&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Why Is Progressive Using "Recent Military Service" To Determine Rates And Eligibility? ]]> con_progressivemilitaryfine.jpg[Update: Progressive responded and clarified that the fine print does NOT mean they will use military service to give you a higher rate.] We got this email tonight from Ceaser, who wants to know why his military service would negatively affect his car insurance:
While searching for new car insurance on progressive and sadly other insurance carriers, figuring what the rate check would be I answered a few questions. Some questions asked were if I was currently in the military and in college, I am both. As an Iraq war Army vet I am currently going to school with the GI bill, and tuition assistance from the Air national guard, so I put that I am both a student and national guard.

Well before I used to call and verify information and just to see if anything was available if there was any sort of military discount available. As always I get told that the prices were low enough that not to require a discount, or that military discounts weren't available from the company, as in Progressive. Geico does give a military discount but their rates are so jacked up that there really isn't a discount, actually $300+ w/ military discount over my progressive, state farm, and sad to say allstate. Anyhow I come to the final page and in the fine print I see this:
 
 Your rate may vary, or you may not be offered a quote, due to eligibility requirements (you may not qualify for that program), credit history, recent military service, or driving record (if your actual record is different than what you told us). If you have been assigned to your recent automobile insurance policy by the state, or if any of the drivers you listed requires proof of financial responsibility, your rate may be higher than those provided by this comparison service. [emphasis ours -Editor]

Now my question is this. With news that 1 in 5 soldiers coming back from Iraq have mental, health, PTSD issues, not to mention the suicide rate climbing among periods of deployments. Long term deployments having stress issues and coping when coming back. Could these news be used to proclaim that Military might be a higher risk therefore lets bend you over and take your money? I hope not but then again most of these companies don't care other than the bottom line. Any insight or help would greatly be appreciated.
Any Progressive lurkers out there who can chime in on the "recent military service" fine print and just how it's used to determine your eligibility and rate?
]]>
Consumerist-381743 Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:46:34 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381743&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Progressive Says Lying Its Way Into Church Support Group To Dig Up Lawsuit Dirt Was "Reasonable" ]]> progressivesucks.jpgRemember how Progressive got caught infiltrating a church support group and secretly recording it in hopes of discrediting two of its members involved in an insurance claim? And then their CEO posted a public apology, calling the incident "apalling?" Well, now, in defending itself against the lawsuit filed by the people whose privacy was breached, Progressive is calling its actions "reasonable." Progressive must be some kind of special alchemist to brew a concoction both "appalling" and "reasonable" at the same time.

Progressive now says its spying was 'reasonable' [Atlanta-Journal Constitution] (Thanks to Christopher!)
(Photo: The Master Shake Signal)

]]>
Consumerist-312215 Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:08:30 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312215&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Progressive Apologizes, Sort Of, For Leaving Customer Stranded Last Weekend ]]> con_desertedroadside.jpg We've received a follow-up email from Chuck, who has spent the better part of the week trying to determine why Progressive's Roadside Assistance service—for which he pays an additional monthly fee on top of his normal insurance premium—sucks so badly that they'd leave a motorist stranded for 45 minutes on a busy Interstate on a weekend morning.

Here's part of Chuck's email:

After dealing with Progressive executive customer service for most of this week I have finally gotten a resolution. Rachel at Progressive is issuing a formal apology from Cross Country (the outsourced roadside assistance people) and an AMEX gift card.

They of course say that this is an unusual circumstance and call volumes were extremely high at 11:30am on a Sunday...

...I asked for a credit in the amount of my October premium and was turned down by Brian Passell, Divisional President.

We're happy the matter has been resolved to Chuck's satisfaction, but also a little surprised that Progressive is still insisting on passing the buck to their hired help. After all, it's their service, their brand, and they collect the money for it, so trying to scapegoat a poorly-run outsourced company is a bit of a cop-out. We think outsourcing should be an internal issue that remains invisible to the customer, or else it's not successful outsourcing—and the company that sold you the service or product is the one to blame. (We're looking at you, too, Mattel.)

But the issue has been resolved to Chuck's satisfaction, so we're happy for him and hope his step-daughter has a better weekend coming up.

(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-310161 Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:16:09 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=310161&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Progressive Roadside Assistance Strands Lady On Roadside ]]> con_desertedroadside.jpg According to a reader, Progressive—the insurance company that sends private detectives to secretly tape-record church support group meetings—took 45 minutes this past weekend to put a live person in contact with a woman who was stranded on a busy Interstate in Nashville after a tire blew out on her car. Eventually, a Tennessee Department of Transportation officer stopped and helped her.

The woman's stepfather, who pays for the insurance, called Progressive Monday morning to find out which part of "roadside assistance" Progressive doesn't understand:

I told my story to a customer service representative who then without me asking transferred me to a manager, Brandy. Brandy was helpful to the extent that she tried to diagnose the problem with the outsourced call center to verify my story. She pulled wait times and various other reports none of which seemed very helpful to either of us. At around 12:45 she said that she had to pull a report and would call me back in 30 to 60 minutes. I am now about to leave the office at 5:30 with no call and no way to reach her.
Nice going, Progressive. We know companies intentionally throttle resources for customer service centers—but when you pay for a service like Roadside Assistance, having a staffed call center doesn't qualify as added value. It's the service itself.

(Thanks to Chuck!)

RELATED
Progressive's Roadside Assistance page
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-308645 Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:28:08 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=308645&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Progressive Insurance Lies Its Way Into Church Support Group To Dig Up Lawsuit Dirt ]]> progressivesucks.jpgJust when you thought insurance companies couldn't get any sleazier, Progressive Insurance got caught sending private eyes to infiltrate and secretly record an Atlanta area church support group in hopes of digging up dirt to discredit a church couple involved in a car accident lawsuit, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports.

After headquarters found out, a letter signed by the President of Progressive apologized for the actions and took full responsibility for them. They also pledged to enact new rules and procedures to prevent future occurrences. That may not be enough for the Insurance Commission and authorities, who say they are investigating the matter.

Members of the sessions, each which began with group pledges to keep the discussion private, disclosed abortions, sexual orientation issues, and drug abuse, all of which were tape-recorded by the Progressive gumshoes. After an emergency convening, and learning their trust and privacy was breached and violated, the group broke down and cried and several members left.

There's no mention of how the private investigators' identity was discovered. Maybe the group got suspicious after the couple would say, "pass" whenever it came their time to confess. Also gotta wonder how "isolated" this incident was. Maybe Progressive was just unlucky enough to get caught in something that goes on all the time. Guess if you're involved in a lawsuit with a company you need to watch out for any "new friends" you suddenly find yourself having.

Private eyes sneak into church group [Atlanta Journal-Constitution]
Company says it's sorry for spying [Atlanta Journal-Constitution] (Thanks to ptkdude!)
(Photo: The Master Shake Signal)

]]>
Consumerist-293110 Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:14:40 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=293110&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Insurers Cut Out The Middleman, Open Own Repair Shops ]]> Insurance companies are opening their own in-house repair shops to avoid haggling with your local mechanic. Local mechanics consistently complain that insurance companies are cheapskates that would rather save a buck than authorize the repairs needed to safely return a car to the road. By opening their own shops, insurers have found the corporate equivalent of sticking your finger in your ear while mouthing "I can't hear you!"

Rather than putting the onus on customers to find a body shop, get an estimate and arrange a rental car, Progressive, Geico and others are setting up one-stop service centers to handle every aspect of the claim.
Progressive and Geico guarantee their repairs for life, though it's difficult to trust someone who has a direct interest in keeping the repair bill low. Two customers interviewed by the Times found obvious defects in the insurance companies' workmanship. Still, the customers left happy, not because their cars worked, but because they were treated well by smiling insurance company representatives. — CAREY GREENBERG-BERGER

One-Stop Car Insurance Service, Body Work Included [NYT]
(Photo: Michael (mx5tx))

]]>
Consumerist-263866 Sun, 27 May 2007 15:52:33 EDT Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=263866&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 10 Confessions Of A Progressive Insurance Rep ]]> A former Progressive car insurance customer service rep has stepped forward into the light to give us the low-down on how his ex-employer works:

I worked at a call center for Progressive Insurance up until about a month ago. I hated my job so much, but I really can't gripe about the company. It is a great company to work for and they are very good to their customers. So I'd like to share with you some inside knowledge about the company; like how to grossly extend your payment, get fees waived, and the logical behind rating factors.

1. Progressive uses a point system to determine your rate...


Comprehensive Claims (0 points)...usually don't effect the rate. In fact, I've never seen one effect someone's rate. Comprehensive claims is fancy insurance talk for claims that are not accidents; like fires, thefts, vandalisms. Don't be afraid to report these kinds of claims. I can virtually guarantee they have no effect on your rate at Progressive.

Not at Fault Accidents...(0 - 1 points)it is rare for a NAF to effect your rate, but it can. They may have a slight effect on your rate, depending on the state. I think this is unfair to hold against someone, but many companies are starting to do this.

DUI, DWI (0 to 2 points). Huh? Most companies won't even insure a DUI. But they are barely a rating factor at Progressive. The logic is that most DUIs don't result in terrible crashes, and most individuals are non-repeat offenders. And typically, repeat and malicious offenders don't have respect for the law, including the law that you are required to carry insurance. If you have a DUI on your record, I can pretty much say you will never find a lower rate than Progressive.

Tickets (1 to 2 points). Usually all speeding, stop sign, defective equipment, traffic light, yield tickets go here. Usually 2 points a piece.

Worse Offenses, At Fault Accidents (3 to 4 points).

Jailable driving offenses (8 points). Drag racing, vehicular homicide, etc.

2. The biggest factors affecting your rate

AGE: Young drivers are much, much more expensive due to their inexperience and sometimes immaturity. As you get older, each year, this factor will help bring your 'risk' down.

GENDER: According to studies, males are higher 'risk' than females. However, new research indicates that females are catching up, so this isn't as huge of a factor anymore.

LOCATION:
Urban areas pay more; with dense traffic, you are much more likely to get in an accident. Poor neighborhoods pay more due to the risk of crime; vandalism, break-ins, and thefts. Even very nice neighborhoods pay slightly more, since if you do get into an accident, you have much better odds of hitting an expensive E-class than an economic Escort. The best areas are middle to lower-middle class suburbs and rural areas.

CREDIT:
Unfortunately for some, this plays a very big role in your rate. The only state exempt from credit checks is California. I had to explain to some customers that their new rates went up because of their credit score. Not fun.

YOUR VEHICLE:
There's a ton of factors that go into this; typically, the lowest risk is 4-door sedans, 2-door coupes, convertibles, minivans, trucks, SUVs. The bigger your vehicle, the more damage it has the potential to cause, which makes it a higher risk. If you hit a car in an intersection with an Cavalier at 25mph, it isn't going to cause nearly same kind of damage as a diesel F-350. Foreign cars are slightly more to insure since replacement parts cost slightly more.

COLOR of your car does NOT effect your rate. This myth was created after a study you've probably read, that red cars are the 'riskiest'. The logic from the study was bright colors, like red, make cars appear that they are going faster than dull or dark colors. As a result, an officer in a speed trap is more likely going to pull over a red car since it looks like it is going faster. And speeding tickets ARE an insurance factor.

YOUR DRIVING HISTORY:
Driving histories go back 36 months, except in New York (which is 40 months). Your history is composed from three reports; your MVR or Motor Vehicle Report, the state database of your ticketed driving history; your CLUE report, a collection of previous insurance companies reports stating the numbers of claims you've had, and YOU. If you say you got in an accident, were never sited for it and never claimed it on your insurance, but you still tell us, it'll be put on your record with an approximate date.

There is no way to get something off of your insurance driving history, other than time. Let's say you had a speeding ticket on 04/23/04. And let's say your renewal date for the next term is on 5/1/07. This speeding ticket will fall off the account and help lower your rate.

However, let's say the speeding ticket was on 5/15/07 when you renew on 5/1/07. That means, for the next six months, this ticket will effect your rate! So if you notice a violation that is a month or closer past the renewal date, tell them you are thinking about leaving because the rate is too high and ask to see if you can get the violation off the account a little early. As long as it's close, they'll try.

3. If you are 21 to 30 years old, unless you are on a parent's plan, Progressive is one of the best rates around.
They provide very good 24/7 customer service and, in my opinion, one of the best claims services ever. Progressive reps do NOT make any sort of commission, so if they try to upsell you, it's for your own protection. One bad crash with only state minimums can ruin you financially for the rest of your life. It happens. No one gets into accidents on purpose, that's why they're called accidents. :)

4. How to pay late without penalty
Extend your due date. Progressive will allow customers to extend their due date up to 10 days later. The only time this doesn't apply is on the first payment of a renewal term. So if your bill is due on April 1, you can extend it until April 11 without a late fee. Just call and ask.

5. How to get a late fee waived
Late Fees are only $5 and you won't be penalized more than once per bill. As long as you are not consistently late with payments, you can usually get this waived if you call with some excuse. Just pretend to be concerned about the late fee on your account ruining your credit or good standing with the company (even though it won't). Technically, Progressive reps aren't allowed to waive any fees without talking to their supervisor first. And if for strange some reason the rep says no, ask for a manager.

6. If you can't pay on time, we're not going to cut you off immediately
Let's assume you have a good payment history. The bill is due April 1. On April 2, you'll get a second notice, giving you about another 7 days. After that, you'll get a Final notice, which can be anywhere from 7 to 23 days. Since all insurance companies must be compliant with each state's department of insurance, each state makes up their own "legal notice", or the amount of a grace period you can pay your bill late.

7. Progressive honors the postmark date of a mailed payment
If you payment is due on April 1 and the envelope is postmarked on that day...even though by the time Progressive receives and processes it on April 7, it is still considered on time without a penalty. And there is no charge to pay over the phone with check or credit.

8. Mail your renewal payment on time
When you sign up, you essentially agree to six month terms, let's say from Jan 1 to Jul 1. You can be late every month; Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun...but if you are late in July, which would be the start of your new term, your first payment is the one that binds coverage. It's the only way to legally show that you agree to the terms of your new insurance contract. Without money, Progressive has no way of knowing you're intentions to renew.

9. How to get a non-sufficient fund fee waived
Aka returned payment, usually $15 to $20. As long as you have a good payment history, just call and say your checkbook was stolen. Every once in a while, a supervisor will ask for proof from the bank. Although it probably won't happen, just call after normal business hours when banks are closed, or anytime Sunday. Call centers are open 24/7. If they still press for proof (again, which they probably won't), just keep pressing the fact that you shouldn't have to wait until tomorrow to prove it and want to get this bill taken care of.

10. How to get an early cancellation fee waived
If you ever want to cancel midterm, you can. Many states have done away with cancel fees, typically about $50. However, if yours still does, when they ask you the reason for canceling, just say you moved out of the state or the country. They may ask you if you tried a rate in your new state, say you did but you found a much better one. No cancel fee will be assessed.

Sincerely,

Former Progressive Licensed CSR,
Dave

— BEN POPKEN

(Photo: simondhweller)

]]>
Consumerist-262641 Tue, 22 May 2007 18:46:58 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=262641&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Improved Your Credit Score? Tell Your Car Insurance Company ]]> If you've improved your credit in the last three years, you might want to ask your insurers to rerun your credit. It might save you some money. Jeff writes:

I emailed you about 2 weeks ago complaining that Progressive Insurance only runs it's credit check every 3 years. Knowing my credit history improved, I thought this unfair and called them.

Since them I received an updated bill and it was $67.50 cheaper (for 6 months)—just based on a new credit check! Obviously if readers credit history worsens, wouldn't recommend an updated credit check, but for most people, if you don't ask for the current credit check, you could be losing dollars.
Good tip, Jeff. Insurers compare your credit score to the scores of their other clients and use it as a way to predict how likely you are to have an accident. Apparently, people with similar credit scores have similar driving habits. For more info on how Progressive uses this information, click here. —MEGHANN MARCO

(Photo:foundphotoslj)

]]>
Consumerist-258280 Mon, 07 May 2007 13:54:08 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=258280&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Progressive Insurance. Not. ]]> Just because an insurance company has Progressive in their name doesn't mean they're any different from the usual penny-pinchers.

Patty's tale, inside, navigates the tortuous twists as Progressive tries to avoid paying her any more then the barest minimum after one of their clients hit her car.

Patty isn't taking it lying down, though. She's fought the Progressive agent at every turn, and now she's taking her case to a lawyer.

But the process hasn't been fun.

After the last go around with the Progressive agent, she says, "I felt like I drank a gallon of gas and ate 7 lit matches!"


"September 30th at Midnight, so October 1, while I was sleep and my husband was working on a homework assignment for college on the computer, our car was parked outside for the night and locked up, a client of Progressive had her boyfriend borrow her car. He drove near our apartment complex after dropping off a friend and accelerated at an unsafe rate of speed. The speed zone is 35 m.p.h., my neighbor who witnessed the whole thing after hearing the glass breaking heard the cops say he was probably going 45-50 m.p.h.

He hit the brand new (this is important I believe and that is why I'm mentioning it) 2005/2006 Buick LeSabre parked car about a foot behind my piece of crap $1500 '98 Neon that was a foot away from a No Parking Sign. He was going so fast, he hit the LeSabre and forced that into my Neon and my Neon came flush with the No Parking Sign. My neighbors window faces the street and came running to see if anyone was hurt. The girl's car stalled out when her boyfriend tried to back it up so he could take off. So instead, he pulled the keys, left the door open, and took off leaving the car there. He ran to where his girlfriend must have been visiting someone here in the complex sleeping on someone's couch because later when she was standing around outside with no shoes on, her boyfriend was saying, "Babe, you need to put your shoes on and say you were driving! I ain't going back Babe. I just got out. You know I just got out. I ain't going back. Fine, we'll tell them it was stolen. That's what we'll do." My neighbor, and friend, overheard the whole damn thing. Dipsticks.

Then, when the cops arrive, the boyfriend stands around, like, "Officer, Officer! I saw the whole thing! I the saw the guy who did it!" Thank God for my neighbor who really DID see the whole thing. When the cop asked for witnesses she said, "See that guy over there giving a witnesses statement to the cops over there to that cop? Yeah, that's the idiot driver and on top that of that if his car didn't stall, he would have taken off. And I heard them talking about how he wanted her to put her shoes on so she can say SHE was the one driving so he wouldn't go back to jail. On top of THAT, they were both going to claim the car was stolen. I heard the whole thing." The cop went to talk to them and before they did they cuffed him so he wouldn't take off knowing he'd been to jail before. Once they started talking sure enough, the couple tried claiming the car was stolen and they didn't know who'd been driving her car. Of course. Of course the cop was prepared and pissed! He told them he knew it wasn't stolen because if it were, the steering column would be busted, and it wasn't. Or, the keys would still be in the car. If the theif had taken off, they wouldn't have taken the keys with them, they would have left the keys in the ignition because they don't care about the keys.

Needless to say the cops didn't buy it, he got arrested, the car got towed because her car was totaled, she was left bawling about how she was going to get to work as a nurses aide at a nursing home with my brother-in-law. "My car, wah, my car, wah, wah, wah...." Well what about my car? I have a daughter who has health problems who has to see specialists sometimes 30-60 minutes away. She sits in the back behind the passenger seat right on the gas tank. I'm going through a half a tank of gas in TWO days time, two bent rims on my back tires, I had a rusted muffler I was about to replace that had no holes in it, but now has 4 huge holes in it, a bumper about to fall completely off, and damage underneath the car. Now I had to call Progressive, which I didn't mind, to start the claim, because I've never been hit before, so I didn't know how things go. But they didn't know the address and phone number of the LeSabre owners, I did. I went out of my way, to set the phone down, walk outside down the block, get that information for them, and relay that to them, which I didn't have to do. Progressive came out checked the damage to my car, I told them about the gas, the bumper, and the muffler, we didn't know about the tires at the time, but that I was willing to have it put up on the lift to check under the car. He said he could see about $800 on the bumper alone, then went to his car, I had to get my daughter to a behavioral therapy appointment, we think she may be autistic and she hits me when she gets picked on by others. I get back and my husband hands me the official estimate. HA! What a JOKE! They were willing to give me $150 for the bumper for the final estimate from some "You pick it, you pull it junkyard", and $50 for paint, and $37.50 for labor. Did they expect me to put this damn thing on myself? LMAO!!! The final estimate came to $567.08 for parts and labor for the bumper and the muffler and that was it. This was about the 5th of October. Now I kept stressing to the idiot, I was willing to put it up on the lift and have THEIR mechanic look it over, they of course never get back to me, so I keep calling them and harassing the crap out of them. By the 10th, my daughter had an appointment with a specialist an hour away and there was no way I was going to have her sit on the gas tank. Not to mention, driving on the thruway there isn't many gas stations on the thruway to fill your car $5 every 1/4 of a tank, is there? So I had to rent a car at $64. I was pissed because by now I should have had my car fixed. My LeSabre neighbor did. They were already driving a 2007 LeSabre because the agent told me personally that they had at least $13,000 coming to them, minimum. And that he was surprised they were still driving their car. He cut their check no questions asked. Me, I'm STILL fighting. And it's the 23rd of October!

The best part was this week. I FINALLY convinced them to put it up on the lift at MY mechanic. Well, actually, I TOLD them it was going on the lift. They could either be there, or not. And I got two estimates, one from my mechanic, and one from another mechanic. I also got the police report in case I have to take someone to small claims court. Progressive keeps claiming over and over since the beginning that the gas is NOT related to the accident even though the agent himself could smell gas when he came out to assess damage. Now, while my car is up on the lift, Progressive authorizes a Rental car for me to use while my car is in the shop. Ok, no problem. Meanwhile, I get the report back from my mechanic. The rims are shot to hell, and so is the fuel assembly line and they found even more damage in the under belly of the car that Progressive is willing to authorize repair on, but not the rims or the gas. STILL. The supervisor used to work on cars. (Everything in quotes are things he told me personally.) He used to "work on cars and he knows a thing or two about them and he knows that even though the car moved a foot there's no way it would have bent both back rims and somehow I must have done it. On top of that, 6 months to a year ago the last time my mechanic put a new fuel line on my tank, not saying he's a bad mechanic and all that, but he must have messed up my car and even though I didn't noticed anything then, my car must have been leaking small amounts over time and I just didn't notice it until the day of the accident when all of a sudden, by coincidence it started gushing more gas, but that doesn't mean the accident caused it." He also stated my mechanic wasn't being "straight" with him. I said you calling my mechanic a liar? He says, "Your putting words in my mouth, Ma'am." I said, "No that is what you said, you said he wasn't being straight with you, meaning he's lying. No matter what language you use, that's how the word goes. Straight means honest, not straight means lying." He again says I'm putting words into his mouth but if I want to put words into his mouth, that's ok. Then he tells me that the muffler is a gift and that if I keep it up, they'll remove the muffler and the muffler labor, about a $100, from the estimate, and (forcefully) "is that what I what them to do, is it? Well is it ma'am?" Then he has the balls to tell me I should have had the muffler fixed before the accident. I said excuse me, for one, we were about to when your drunk client's boyfriend hit MY car! I'm the innocent party and you're treating me as if I'm the one who caused the accident and I don't appreciate it one bit and hung up on him. I don't know who they think they're threatening, but you DON'T threaten someone who can be a bitch. First thing I did was call my mechanic and told him what they were saying about him. And what they tried pulling with the muffler. He told me, that they told him the same thing AND they wanted HIM to call me the day before to call me to tell me the muffler was a gift and I "should be thankful I was getting it." He flat out told them, why the hell should I call her? For one, what are you going to do for me? Nothing. For two, it's not up to me to call her, it's up to you to work out the estimate with her, not the mechanic.

I call the supervisor back and tell him I want the gas fuel assembly line and the rims added to the estimate AND that I have two estimates that state that at minimum that the gas IS from the accident. He says, any mechanic will tell me what I want to hear to get my business. (this is important) He says the $500 is their final offer. He asks me what do I want to do about the repairs and the $500 estimate they gave me and I said let me think about it. I swear, not more than 30 minutes later, the rental company calls and says I have to return the car now. Huh? I find out from Enterprise when the car is due back, he says as long as the keys are in the drop box by midnight, we're ok. I call my mechanic and tell him to put our car keys under the driver seat so we can pick up our car and immediate get on the phone to rip an agent a new one once again. I call the supervisor and tell him it was nice of them to personally us and let us know that it was time to return the car. He says "you didn't expect to keep it forever did you?" Ooh, now I was really fuming! I said, "No I didn't expect to keep it forever, but I was under the impression I had it while the car was on the lift and while it was repaired. Am I mistaken?" He said, "You wouldn't call me back." It was a HALF AN HOUR! Let me think on it means just that? You think you're going to bully me into taking what you're willing to offer and I'm going to roll over and play dead for you? Oh hell no!

So I told him I was on the phone, I didn't realize I had to call you back within 2 seconds, but hey, now I see how you run a business. You can't even be bothered to call me yourself when it's time to turn in the car. You have the rental company do it for you.

"Oh I'm sorry ma'am, I thought the agent handling the claim contacted you."

Well obviously he didn't. Not to mention, I give you two estimates which state the damage is from the accident, which you blow off and tell me their lying and telling me what I want to hear just to get my business.

"I didn't say they were saying what you want to hear."

You know what, what is the final estimate?

"658.64"

Send me out a check for that amount. I will be taking that unsigned check, the police report, and those estimates, as well as a few others to a lawyer's office next week. Thank you for your time. And I hung up because I felt like I drank a gallon of gas and ate 7 lit matches. Ugh!

Patty C."
]]>
Consumerist-209792 Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:19:10 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=209792&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Save On Insurance By Calling Around. Duh. ]]> Spotted this at the often quite good I Will Teach You To Be Rich blog.

Today they've got a face-palm easy post on saving money on insurance rates. The secret insider tip... is to call all the providers and find the best quote.

Geico: 1-800-861-8380
State Farm: 1-877-734-2265
Allstate: 1-877-572-5268
Progressive: 1-800-776-4737
AAA: 1-877-323-4222

The blog says the best way to get a good price is not to ask, "Is that a good price?" but, "What other discounts do you have?"

]]>
Consumerist-209642 Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:42:23 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=209642&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Counterpoint: God Denies Causing Car Accident ]]> Martin, also a California lawyer, doesn't believe God was in that crashing car at all. He writes:

"The person below who claims to be a California lawyer has misunderstood the law of negligence and the responsibility of a driver on the road. He incorrectly believes the negligence requires that someone do something intentionally. It doesn't. The driver had a duty to operate his vehicle safely (as we all do) and he breached that duty when he lost control of the vehicle and crashed into someone.

While having a stroke might a defense to a criminal action (since he had no intent), it is not a defense to negligence, which does not require intent at all.

I think that the person who originally contacted The Consumerist is confused about how liability insurance works. If Progressive is the stroke victim/driver's liability insurance company, they don't have to pay anything until the driver loses a lawsuit, and then the insurance company's only obligation is to pay the damages that its insured (the driver) is ordered by a court to pay.

Now, it is often the case that the insurance company settles without a lawsuit, in order to avoid the costs associated with hiring a lawyer, etc.

Act of God clauses usually apply in property damage claims made by the insured (i.e., his car is struck by the finger of god, lightning). So, if you are trying to get your insurance company to pay for damage caused by a stroke victim/driver, I could see them attempting to invoke the Act of God clause, but I think that they would not win if you sued them.

The act of God clause has no application here. If the guy hit someone, he's responsible, and when he loses a lawsuit, his insurance company will have an obligation to pay his damages. If they choose to do so beforehand, that's fine. But, if they don't, the only remedy is to find a lawyer and sue him (not his insurance company) for the damage he caused."

Guess this is why they call 'em lawyers. We'll need to get a judge to sort this one out for certain.

Previously:
Why The Car Accident Was God's Fault
God Works In Mysterious Car Accidents

]]>
Consumerist-206372 Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:40:32 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=206372&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Why The Car Accident Was God's Fault ]]> godhead.jpgWhile we were busy being befuddled, a California lawyer slipped a smart-bomb in the comments.

Bluegus32 tells us that insurance is all about negligence. Since nobody knew about the driver's stroke condition, "from a strictly legal perspective, the insurance company has no liability."

    "He didn't know that he had a medical condition. He did not do anything illegal or improper. He was driving his car when seized by a previously-unknown condition. This easily qualifies as a "freak accident."

    There is no negligence. Since the insurer's liability is based upon the negligence of its insured, then there is no coverage here. The insured was not negligent. Therefore, his insurance company is not liable.

    I know this sounds like it's a horrific result but this is textbook tort law.

    This, my friends, is a wonderful example of why you must always carry full insurance coverage so that YOUR OWN insurance company can cover your damages in such an event."

Previously: God Works In Mysterious Car Accidents

]]>
Consumerist-206369 Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:12:30 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=206369&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ God Works In Mysterious Car Accidents ]]> Did you know that if a guy has a stroke while driving and barrels into four other cars, and no one knows he had a tumor beforehand, it's considered an Act of God?

And therefore Progressive insurance won't pay for the other car's damage?

We didn't either, until we read ACurmudgeon's letter, inside.

Good thing the guy's health insurance has a different definition for holy works.



    "I was involved in an auto accident recently

    Another driver coming in the opposite direction had a stroke while driving.

    Instead of turning, he ran full speed into the other lanes of traffic. Thankfully, nobody was hurt and the driver with the stroke seemed like he will live.

    The stroke victim plowed into a big work van that was pushed back into our car. The damage is major, the entire back passenger door is crushed.

    The problem starts when, after a week of waiting, the police report is ready. Seem like a no-brainer to me, guy has stroke, hits cars and has insurance...

    Apparently since the driver did not have a pre-existing condition and did not know he had a tumor, Progressive does not have to pay for any of the 4 other cars involved in an accident. This apparently called an "Act of God". They don't pay for those.

    What can the insurance companies use [Act of God] for? What qualifies?"

]]>
Consumerist-206349 Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:07:50 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=206349&view=rss&microfeed=true