<![CDATA[Consumerist: Pr]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Pr]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/pr http://consumerist.com/tag/pr <![CDATA[ Amazon Pulls Negative Reviews Of 'Spore,' Then Reinstates Them ]]> Earlier today, about 2200 reviews of the game Spore disappeared from the product page on Amazon.com, almost all of them negative. Did Amazon censor the reviews because of their anti-DRM nature? Amazon says no, that it was a technical glitch, and they restored the reviews by the end of today. An Amazon spokesperson told Ars Technica, "Amazon doesn't censor or edit customer reviews based [on their content] and we'd only remove a review if it fell outside our guidelines." Spore's rating is back to a single star, and it's #5 on Amazon's video games chart.

"Amazon temporarily gags Spore critics, deletes and restores all customer reviews" [ArsTechnica] (Thanks to Nathan!)

]]>
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:26:36 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5049321&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Charges Filed Against Bed, Bath & Beyond Manager Who Refused To Allow 911 Call ]]> Police have charged Elizabeth Miller, the manager of the Bed, Bath & Beyond in Lexington, Kentucky, who refused to let a couple use the store's phone to call 911 to report a three-year-old locked in a van, and refused to make an announcement over the store's PA system. The charge is "failure to report dependency, neglect and abuse, a Class B misdemeanor that carries a maximum sentence of 90 days and a maximum fine of $250."

The county attorney quoted in the Kentucky Lexington Leader-Herald article points out that common decency should always trump any store policy, misinterpreted or not. In fact, it's the law!

First Assistant Fayette County Attorney Brian Mattone told the Herald-Leader Thursday that under the duty-to-report statute, everyone has the duty to report dependency, neglect and abuse of a child if they have knowledge of it. Mattone said prosecutors thought that Miller, through witnesses, had knowledge of possible abuse or neglect. Moreover, there is language in the statute that says “nothing should relieve their obligation to report,” Mattone said.

The article also quotes another shopper who says she received a similar response from a different Bed, Bath & Beyond last summer when she saw a dog locked inside a car. Here's hoping that the company's "we're ashamed this happened" response is authentic, and that their employees learn that it's okay to offer help sometimes.

"Store clerk charged with failing to help child locked in van" [Herald-Leader] (Thanks to Michael and Donald!)
(Photo: Morton Fox)

]]>
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:48:14 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048701&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dell Downgraded From "Evil" To "Bumbling" ]]> "They've been downgraded from evil to bumbling." - Me in FORTUNE about Dell's online thrusts that attempt to repair their image and listen to their customers more. What do you think? Do you feel any better about them than you did two years ago, or are do their customers still writhe in the eternal flames of "Dell Hell?" Would you add Dell to your Facebook?

Michael Dell 'Friends' his customers [FORTUNE]

]]>
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:39:26 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048592&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ BB&B Responds To Customer Complaint Over 911 Debacle ]]> UPDATE: Charges Filed Against Bed, Bath & Beyond Manager Who Refused To Allow 911 Call

Appalled by the events described in, "Bed, Bath & Beyond Will Not Let You Use The Phone To Call 911," one reader sent a chastising email to their public relations division. In particular, he took aim at their statement that they were using it as a "training opportunity," which sounds pretty antiseptic and corporate considering that a child's life could have been in danger. Their VP of customer service responded. Their correspondence follows.

Reader email:

To whom it may concern,

When I read a headline online about Bed, Bath and Beyond not allowing a customer to call 911 I thought for sure it would be an exaggeration. When I saw it was not an exaggeration I thought for sure that your company would have issued a statement condemning the actions of your employee and manager who refused to allow a customer to call 911.

I have read the various statements made by Bed, Bath and Beyond and find them absolutely unacceptable. When did turning a blind eye to a crime in progress become acceptable exactly? I understand the basic idea of not wanting to become involved with incidents occurring in the parking lot in which your store is located; however employees and especially managers absolutely MUST be able to make a judgment call on when it is proper to override basic policy.

I understand privacy policies and so I know your company will never release a statement saying that the employee and or the manager have been reprimanded, but to say that you will be using it as a "training opportunity" is a sad and again, unacceptable alternative. I have worked in retail, and I have managed retail stores. I can tell you right now that if such an event had occurred in my store I would have immediately fired all employees involved and used THAT as a training opportunity.

If your company cannot be bothered to hire employees who cannot even make a rational moral decision regarding the life of a child a mere hundred yards away I will not be bothered to shop at your stores, and I will tell everyone I know about your companies total lack of responsibility and failure to adhere to even the most basic of moral codes.

I understand you don't care about losing one customer, but I assure you there are hundreds and thousands of people who are absolutely unsatisfied with your response thus far and it would make your company millions to post a public announcement on your website condemning the actions of your employees and assuring people that such actions are not going to be tolerated by Bed, Bath and Beyond.

I hope whoever reads this has a better moral fiber and is able to see beyond a rule book and understand that as a society we are all bound together, we cannot turn a blind eye.

BB&B response:

First of all, I want you to know that I understand and appreciate your position. We are ashamed at how the situation was handled.

The most recent statement that we issued yesterday indicated that this situation was not handled the way we would have expected it to be handled. We have no policies that should have impeded our ability to respond in this case. And yes, we are using this unfortunate occurrence as an opportunity to re-train our associates nationwide. Like you, we do not want anything like this to happen again.

I hope that you'll understand that I cannot comment on personnel issues.

Thanks for your feedback and I hope that, in light of this, you'll reconsider. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me.

Hank Reinhart
Vice President, Customer Service
Bed Bath & Beyond

Nice to see a human response. More humanity like that from the associates nationwide will go a long way towards preventing future tragedies, and from them getting renamed Bed Bath and Dead Kids.

PREVIOUSLY: Bed, Bath & Beyond Will Not Let You Use The Phone To Call 911
(Photo: Morton Fox)

]]>
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:01:13 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5047697&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ It Looks Like High Fructose Corn Syrup Manufacturers Are Getting A Little Nervous ]]> The Corn Refiners Association is sick and tired of people expressing uncertainty about the dubious heath benefits of high fructose corn syrup, so they're running some commercials featuring aggressively annoying people getting schooled on the "facts" about our most omnipresent sweetener. All we managed to glean from the commercials is that not consuming high fructose corn syrup makes you rude. In the first one, one mom walks up to another (who is pouring some sort of pink liquid from a jug) and says, "Wow, you don't care what the kids eat, huh?" What a jerk.

]]>
Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:25:07 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5046485&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Obama Took Hillary As VP "Very Seriously" ]]> I like to keep it pretty apolitical here at The Consumerist, but when Obama uttered the very same PR-double-speak phrase, "taking it seriously," that we've been skewering for eight months, I had to post it.

WHO: Barack Obama
WHAT: Shortly before the opening of the Democratic National Convention, Obama assured America that Hillary was always a viable candidate in his VP search.
WHERE: Obama Dismisses Worries About Clinton Fallout [New York Times]
THE QUOTE: "'I've tried not to have long discussions about short lists, long lists...But I’ve said publicly before and I will repeat again that Senator Clinton would be on anybody’s short list, so I took her very seriously."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies (and now, presidential candidates) use over and over again to appear contrite or thoughtful without actually saying or doing anything. Our series of posts documenting the phrase's attempts recurrences are our attempt to question how much seriousness-taking is actually going on.

(Thanks to Michael Belisle!)

(Photo: BohPhoto)

]]>
Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:16:30 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5041708&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Coinstar Calls Cashing In Change 'Recycling' ]]> Douglas writes, "Coinstar wants you to 'recycle' your coins in their machines, and save the environment! Minus their 8.9% fee of course." They even have a little wizard on their website that estimates how many parts of the environment—water, energy consumption, and geological waste—you save by putting those coins back into circulation, instead of hoarding them like the polar bear murderer you are. They don't provide any source for these estimates, though, and we're not convinced you're doing anything "green" other than lining Coinstar's pockets.

From Coinstar's website:

Think of it as a new form of recycling—when you reuse your change instead of letting it sit idle in your coin jar, fewer coins are produced. And that translates into environmental savings by reducing hte need for limited natural resources used to create new coin.

We're deeply skeptical of any one-to-one benefit statement like this, not least because it ignores the total cost of running the Coinstar company, which is a key component of any coin recycling "movement."

If you're going to cash in your spare change, look for a Commerce Bank branch nearby first. Their change machines are free and you don't have to be a Commerce customer to use them.

]]>
Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:11:49 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5038295&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sam's Club Pretends Its Polystyrene Cup Is Green ]]> Gregg saw this cheerful environmentally-friendly message on the side of his Sam's Club soda cup. Wait, what? We guess it saves Sam's Club fuel costs to ship the cups, but that sounds more like a profit-friendly quality. Gregg notes another benefit of the cup: "[it] may never biodegrade but at least it's easy on my drinkin' elbow."

]]>
Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:04:28 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5037553&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Walmart Takes Salmonella Peppers Very Seriously ]]> WHO: Walmart
WHAT: A man is suing Walmart for selling him salmonella-tainted peppers that got him sick.
WHERE: Man Sues Wal-Mart Over Tainted Peppers [Washington Post]
THE QUOTE: "Obviously, food safety is very important to us. It's a matter we take very seriously," said Walmart spokesperson Daphne Davis Moore . "We'll take a very close look at it."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again to appear contrite without actually saying or doing anything. Our series of posts documenting recurrences of the phrase attempts to question how much seriousness-taking is actually going on.

(Photo: lucianvenutian)

]]>
Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:51:52 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033957&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Tony Roma Corporate Responds To Shrinking Beer Complaint ]]> Tony Roma corporate sent Alex the following response to his complaint over being sold a 16 oz beer and getting a 14 oz beer instead:

Dear Mr. R:

Thank you for contacting Tony Roma's Guest Relations. Please accept our apologies for the disappointment you had at Tony Roma's in San Francisco, CA. Each guest plays an important role in helping us maintain the standards by which we operate and we appreciate your feedback. Your message is being forwarded to the franchise owner/operator and the Director of Franchise Operations for this location. Management would like to discuss your visit and will contact you at the earliest opportunity. Thank you.

Martha Killion
Guest Relations
Romacorp, Inc.

Alex has promised to keep us updated on this developing story. We shall wait and see whether they make things right, or decide to reinvent math.

PREVIOUSLY: Tony Roma's, Where 16oz = 14oz

(Photo: Rick McCharles)

]]>
Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:35:30 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5017356&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Chrysler Execs To Call New Owners To See How Things Are Going ]]> Chrysler has extracted the DNA of our executive email carpet bomb and used it to create a weird new outreach program: starting next week, 300 Chryslers execs will each call a different recent purchaser of a Chrysler, Dodge, or Jeep vehicle and ask if there are any problems. According to Cars.com's blog Kicking Tires, they'll keep doing this "until Chrysler chairman and chief executive officer Bob Nardelli is satisfied that if his customers have troubles, their problems will be fixed. Nardelli, by the way, is going to make the calls, too." That last sentence—well, really the whole idea—becomes funnier when you know where Nardelli once worked.

"The aim is to get in touch with our customers because they are more than just numbers," said Doug Betts, vice president and chief customer officer for Chrysler, which means he's in charge of ensuring quality.

"When a person is happy with his or her car, they tend to tell five other people,” Betts said. “But when they’re unhappy, they tell 50 people — friends, relatives, neighbors and fellow workers. A positive experience obviously sells more cars. An unpleasant experience doesn't. If a person we call has a problem, it's up to us to make it right."

Sure, it's a stunt—but in a week they're opening up a short-lived line of communication with 2,100 customers instead of hiding behind dealerships and call centers.

We're curious to see how this turns out, so if anyone receives a call from a Chrysler executive in the coming days, please let us know how the call goes.

"Chrysler Execs Phone Your Home" [Kicking Tires]
(Photo: Getty Images)

]]>
Sat, 10 May 2008 20:15:14 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5007792&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Circuit City Finally Refunds $169 Fraudulent Charge ]]>

The lady whom Circuit City charged an extra $169 for an HDTV installation will finally get her money back. The fee was because it was over a fireplace and fireplaces are usually made of brick. However, this fireplace was fake and the wall was drywall. When a local TV news investigation team started asking questions, Circuit City Spokeswoman Jackie Foreman just kept chirping, "It's resolved." Two days after the report aired, Jackie told the reporters, "Byrd's installation was not standard…due to a miscommunication; Ms. Byrd will receive a refund."

Woman gets refund of Firedog's extra fee [WRAL] (Thanks to Cheryl!)
PREVIOUSLY: Circuit City Will Not Refund Your $169 Even If The Local News Calls On Your Behalf

]]>
Fri, 02 May 2008 11:00:00 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5007590&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Netflix's Statement On "Are These Netflix DVDs Legit?" ]]> After seeing our post where a reader raised concerns about whether Netflix DVDs he got with unofficial-looking labels and messed-up menus were counterfeit, Netflix's VP of Corporate Communications, Steve Swasey, sent us the following lovenote to calm our fears:

Netflix rents only studio or filmmaker authorized DVDs – no copies. Netflix has more than 100,000 titles on DVD available for rental, so labeling takes many forms. DVDs marked “for sale only” were purchased legally and legitimately by Netflix for rental to Netflix members. And yes, each DVD is individually inspected before it’s shipped.

Netflix ships 1.9 million DVDs on a typical day out of more than 50 distribution centers across the U.S. (including Alaska and Hawaii). Occasionally an error occurs and a Netflix member receives the wrong title or a scratched disc. But the probability of a Netflix member receiving a copied disc is very slight. Four copied discs, even less.

Netflix is the #1 rated ecommerce site for customer satisfaction by Nielsen Online and ForeSee Results because of the outstanding convenience, selection and value available to 8.2 million Netflix members. Concerns such as those raised by The Consumerist are extremely rare. But something we’re looking into nonetheless.

Thank you.

PREVIOUSLY: Are These Netflix DVDs Legit?

]]>
Thu, 01 May 2008 17:58:25 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5007545&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Circuit City Denies Its In-Home TV Calibration Is A Total Scam ]]> Speaking on behalf of Circuit City in regards to our post, "Circuit City's In-Home TV Calibration Is A Total Scam", Mike Vallebuona of New Media Strategies (a company that protects its clients from "online attacks, rumors and misinformation") send us the following pulsating pile of drivel:

First, Firedog technicians should only perform services that they are properly trained in completing. Second, the employee’s testimonial is not accurate regarding the way in which Circuit City calibrates televisions. Firedog technicians follow procedures recommended by Sound & Vision, a professional authority on home theater, audio, video and multimedia products. When conducted properly, the test patterns improve television performance including contrast, brightness and power usage, among other aspects. Additionally, on an unrelated note, an e-mail appears to be circulating that claims Circuit City and other stores have filed for bankruptcy. If you receive this e-mail, please know that the information is completely false, as far as Circuit City is concerned.
That's nice. But according to the employee, his boss made him perform the test he apparently hadn't been trained at all to do, and was threatened with job termination if he didn't go and do it. Does Circuit City have a similar policy against managers telling employees to "make believe like you're changing settings" ? If you have fingers attached your hands, you can probably operate the contrast and brightness settings on your TV, and save yourself from Circuit City's useless tv calibration "service." Oh, and we're glad to hear that Circuit City isn't filing for bankruptcy, as that would totally throw our "who is Circuit City a takeover target for" betting pool totally out of whack.

PREVIOUSLY: Insiders: Circuit City's In-Home TV Calibration Is A Total Scam

]]>
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:04:51 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5007366&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Comcast Apologizes For Tech's Van Blocking Driveway ]]> comcasttruck.jpgFrank Eliason from Comcast Executive Customer Service provided the following statement regarding the San Fransican whose Comcast cable service mysteriously shut off 10 minutes after asking a tech to move his van from in front of his driveway:

I just wanted to provide some clarification regarding Daniel's situation. The technician parked in front of Daniel's house did not disconnect the connection in any way. But we did want to try to resolve the issue for Daniel as quickly as possible. We received the initial call regarding the outage at 11:00 AM. We had a technician at his location by 3:00. The technician verified the connection and identified a network problem that could not be rectified (or caused) on the Customer's premises. We escalated the situation to have this looked into. We also promised to have this resolved within 1 business day. The next afternoon we called Daniel to inform him the network issue was resolved. We have also apologized to him for the problem occurring in the first place. The initial outage occurred on April 8 and it was resolved on April 9. We have also followed up with Daniel to make sure that he has not had further problems.

It is certainly our goal to avoid outages, but at times they do occur. When this happens we want to resolve it as quickly as possible. This was not related to wiring or connections, so this was not the doing of the technician in question.

We do apologize that the van was blocking his driveway and for the inconvenience of the outage!

Hooray, we love when things are fixed.

PREVIOUSLY: Ask Comcast Tech To Move His Van, Mysteriously Lose Signal

(photo: Spidra Webster)

]]>
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:32:24 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381005&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Running Low On In-Store Exchanges Under Your Total Access Plan? Try Visiting A Different Blockbuster Location ]]> Hacking Netflix reports that many Blockbuster locations don't use a centralized network to keep tabs on Total Access usage. The tip was originally reported by Kevin Tostado, who took down his post after a ball-busting conversation with Blockbuster in which they asked him to cease and desist. Fortunately, Google's marvelously efficient spiders reached Kevin's site before Blockbuster and preserved the post.

Here's what he wrote:

Well, after I had blown through my 5 free in-store exchanges by mid-March (on the bottom of your Blockbuster receipt it tracks how many in-store exchanges you've done this month), I decided to see what happens if I go in and try a get 6th in-store exchange. Well, as to be presumed, I didn't get a free exchange, but the online movie did serve as a $3.00 coupon off the price of the rental ($4.99 movie), which just further confused me. Apparently, buried in their FAQs it says "If the pre-determined number of free in-store exchanges is met during the calendar month, you have the ability to exchange your Online DVDs for discounted movie rentals for the remainder of the month." The bummer is it doesn't mention how much of a discount it is. For a .99 rental, is there even a discount?

In the process of trying to figure out the limits of the system, I realized that different Blockbuster stores are keeping track of the in-store exchanges separately. Yes, that's right. After getting my free 5 in-store exchanges at one store, I simply took my next 5 online movies to another nearby Blockbuster and was able to get another 5 in-store exchanges during the same month.

Before dashing out to exchange your DVDs, be warned: Blockbuster is threatening vengeance on anyone who takes advantage their apparently lax oversight:
Blockbuster tracks whether individuals are abusing their online subscription plan and "gaming" the system to exceed the number of in-store exchanges they are allowed per month.

If an online subscriber tries to circumvent the terms of their plan, and in this instance gain more free rentals than allowed, we'll know and ask them to stop if they want to remain an online subscriber, just as we're doing with Kevin.

Make of this what you will.

Blockbuster Total Access Extra Movie Hack? [Hacking Netflix]
Blockbuster Warns Against "Gaming the System" [Hacking Netflix]
(Photo: Knowzy) (Thanks to Jeff!)

]]>
Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:35:30 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376576&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Creative Backs Down, Reinstates Spurned Developer ]]> Creative Labs heard your chest-beating across the internet and decided to reinstate spurned developer Daniel_K less than a week after booting him from their forums. Unlike Creative, Daniel_K issued drivers that allowed Creative sound cards to work properly under Vista, and even enabled previously crippled features. The drivers were downloaded over 100,000 times. The company thanked the developer by accusing him of "enabling our technology and IP to run on sound cards for which it was not originally offered or intended, [in] effect, stealing our goods." Even though he has been reinstated, Daniel_K is still pissed.

"They publicly threatened me, just to show their arrogance," he told El Reg by email.

He told us that Creative contacted him on a chat session. "They were sarcastic, ironic and asked me if I wanted something from them, as if I were expecting something," he wrote. "It was my protest against them and would like to see how far it would go."

He acknowledges that Creative has a case regarding intellectual property, but is furious about the company's strategy. "I'd say they are stealing [from] their own customers by disabling features based on technologies they own (so they did it on purpose) and by charging for a software that requires an improved driver that they refuse to provide."

"At least they are getting flamed all over the web and they are certainly mad about it. That is enough reward for my hard work," he wrote.

Though Creative claims that their eviction notice "did not make it as clear as we would have liked that we do support driver development by independent third parties," the company is hardly contrite. A statement released to the press defiantly declared that they do not support or appreciate "the unauthorized distribution of other companies' property." Way to learn from the experience, Creative.

Creative climbs down over home brew Vista drivers [The Register]
(Photo: Young Frankenstein)
PREVIOUSLY: Creative Sparks Customer Revolt When It Tries To Silence Third-Party Programmer

]]>
Sat, 05 Apr 2008 11:39:41 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376498&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Comcast Spews BS When You Complain About HD Degradation ]]> David wanted a straight answer from Comcast as to whether they were degrading his HD signal, but instead was fed a colossal trough of baloney. The executive customer service rep who replied to David's email said Comcast is using a "new system" for HD and while it "works well with clean 1080i signals, we're making some adjustments to improve how it handles other types of HD signals so we can bring you the best HD picture. We apologize this has not created the HD experience that we intended, but we will work towards getting it right. " Sure... check out this previous post, Comcast Degrades HD Quality To Make Room For More Channels, for the science and proof of how Comcast (and other cable operators) are degrading HD feeds to make more money. The full exchanges between David and the Comcast reps, inside...

analyst Kris has entered room
Kris: Hello amanda_, Thank you for contacting Comcast Live Chat Support. My name is Kris. Please give me one moment to review your information.
Kris: I will be happy to assist you with your questions today.
amanda: ok
Kris: I apologize for the inconvenience, I can understand your frustration.
Kris; Please give me a minute while I pull up your account.
Kris: Can you please provide the serial number from the bottom of the box?
amanda: I understand you are compressing HD channels now on the History HD channel to make more room for other channels, this seems to be effecting my HD quality.. is this a known problem?
Kris: This is the first of its kind that we encountered and I am having it noted.
Kris: Can you please provide the serial number from the bottom of the box?
amanda: I am not able to lift it up... is there another way to get the SN out of it from a menu command?
amanda: or can I give some personal info to look up my account?
Kris: is that the only HD box?
amanda: yes, the only one
Kris: I already have your account. I just need to trouble shoot the correct box,.
amanda: ok
Kris: Please make sure that the box is turned on.
amanda: cause I have look at several articles stating that several HD channels are now being compressed to carry more HD content, and for the last few days, my A&E Hd, and history channel HD look very degraded..
amanda: yes it is on
Kris: i will send a signal to refresh your box.
amanda: ok
Kris: I will now send a hit signal.
amanda: ok.. waiting...
Kris: I have sent a signal to your digital box. Can you please check to see if this has resolved your issue?
amanda: one sec
amanda: I have degraded service on A&E, discovery, and history HD...
amanda: FROM THE WEB, Wow. Can this company be any more evil? "It looks like Comcast is degrading the quality of some HD channels in order to make room for more channels. So far the Comcast channels receiving extra compression are: Discovery Channel, SciFi, USA, Food, NatGeo, UHD, A&E, HGTV, Starz, Cinemax, HBO, TLC, Animal Planet, Discovery HD Theater, and History HD.
amanda: that is the info I have
Kris: There are no HD issues reported for your area. Is it fine with you if I schedule a technician to have it checked?
Kris: I am sorry but we are not degrading services.
amanda: it sure seems like it.. because all the channels in the list are degraded... seems real weird.... is there a new HD box top that might solve this problem? mine is kind of old
amanda: I think I might just cancel my HD service... how do I go about doing that?
Kris: I can process that for you and schedule a tech to have your box replaced. Another option is to return the box to your local office and replace it with a regular box.

—-—-—-- Forwarded message —-—-—--
From: David R
To: brian_roberts@comcast.com
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 16:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: NO MORE HD

Dear Mr. Roberts,

I want to let you know about my total dissatisfaction with your new attempt to carry 3 HD channels worth of bandwidth in the space of 2, effectively degrading my HD service.

I am a avid History Channel watcher, and enjoy the HD service for it's crisp picture and clarity. Now that you have decided to try and compete with FIOS, you have degraded your own HD signals to try and carry more channels. This has totally messed up my HD channels that I watch, and makes me wonder why I am paying full price now for down-graded service.

This is just another reason why I might leave Comcast and move to FIOS. Don't degrade your own channels to say "we have more HD", just give me good HD on the channels I have now... PLEASE!!!!

Dave R

—- "Asbury, Cynthia" Cynthia_Asbury@cable.comcast.com wrote:

Good evening Mr. R,

Thank you for the feedback to Brian Roberts. As you are aware, we are constantly striving to provide improved services to our Customers, including a wide variety of HD content. In an effort to do this, we have recently started using a new system to deliver some HD channels.

While this system works well with clean 1080i signals, we're making some adjustments to improve how it handles other types of HD signals so we can bring you the best HD picture. We apologize this has not created the HD experience that we intended, but we will work towards getting it right.

Thank you for being a Comcast Customer!

Sincerely,
Ms. Asbury

National Customer Operations
Executive Office
One Comcast Center
Phila, Pa. 19103

—-—-—-- Forwarded message —-—-—--
From: David Rogers
To: "Asbury, Cynthia" Cynthia_Asbury@cable.comcast.com
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Comcast HD channels

Ms. Asbury,

I beg to differ. This has nothing to do with 1080i vs 720i. This seems to have every thing to due with Comcast over compressing HD singles in limited bandwidth, and not informing your customers regarding the degraded HD signals, nor offering your customers a reduced rate for the degraded HD signal.

This seems to be nothing more than a marketing campaign to try and be able to state that "we have more HD than XYZ". Seeing that FIOS is available, and that Direct TV has just launched another satellite offering HD, I no longer see any reason to hang on to Comcast's degraded HD service.

Dave R

PREVIOUSLY: Comcast Degrades HD Quality To Make Room For More Channels ]]>
Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:56:48 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=375341&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Geek Squad Feels "Unfairly Targeted" By Consumerist Expose ]]> When personal finance magazine Kiplinger asked the Geek Squad about our video that caught one of their technicians stealing porn from our harddrive (peeping tomism, hardly limited to Geek Squad, is just as rampant in the computer repair industry as the photo developing industry), an unidentified Geek Squad spokeswoman ingenuously responded, "We have been the target of a blog that prefers to focus on the exceptions to our service and not the overall, vast majority of successful services we provide to clients." That's like saying dirt is unfairly targeted by a broom. Where there's a valid complaint, we'll post. Where there's a consumer whose rights aren't respected, we will defend. We don't have a vendetta against the Geek Squad, or any other company. We have a vendetta against bad customer service. That's our bottom line. After the jump, the original undercover video...

]]>
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:47:22 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373702&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Verizon Erases, Then Restores, Dead Wife's Lost Voice ]]> playrewindmessages.jpgVerizon snipped one of the few remaining threads connecting Charles Whiting to his dead wife when they upgrade the 80-year-old man's phone system. The update erased his wife saying, "The Whitings aren't home," a message Mr. Whiting listened to every day for the comfort it gave him. When Whiting called to complain, he was left on hold for an hour and was then disconnected. Then he waited on hold for another 90 minutes, only to be told that his wife's voice was lost forever. Whiting said, "It was like she was still with me when I heard that. Now they took her voice away." After his story hit the news circuit, Verizon restored the previously "irretrievable" message. Amazing how a little bad press works to get good customer service.

New York Man Loses Dead Wife's Voice Message in Phone Service Upgrade [FOXnews] (Thanks to Ed!)
Phone Company Retrieves Voice From Past [AP]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:33:26 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=369916&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ California Hospital Takes Botched Operations Seriously ]]> WHO: St. Joseph Hospital in Orange County.
WHAT: The California Department of Public Health is investigating St. Joseph for conducting three 'wrong site' operations since January 2006. Botched surgeries include operating on a patient's good knee and making an incision on the wrong side of a patient's head.
WHERE: Orange hospital under investigation for operating room error [L.A. Times]
THE QUOTE: "Members of the clinical team involved in these cases have been deeply affected, and as a hospital we take this very seriously and regret that it happened," [Dr. Raymond Casciari, St. Joseph's chief medical officer] said.

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again in public statements whenever they have bad PR. Our series of posts on occurrences of the phrase is our attempt to question how seriously companies are really taking these matters if every time they trot out this phrase by rote.

(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:43:30 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368325&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Go-Cart Track Takes Scalped Customer's Safety Very Seriously ]]> gokartscalped.jpgWHO: A Utah Go-Cart track
WHAT: A woman's long hair got tangled in the moving parts of a go-cart and her hair, scalp, and ear were ripped from her head.
WHERE: WDEF
THE QUOTE: "The owner of the go-cart track says... this was an extremely unfortunate accident that he feels horrible about...He also said the company takes safety of its customers very seriously."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again in public statements whenever they have bad PR. Our series of posts on occurrences of the phrase is our attempt to question how seriously companies are really taking these matters if every time they trot out this phrase by rote.

(Thanks to David!) (Image: CNN)

]]>
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:56:06 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367716&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ An astroturfing group started by chemical ... ]]> An astroturfing group started by chemical supergiant Monsanto is trying to stop the spread of milk that's free of bovine synthetic growth hormone. They say they're trying to defend farmer's rights but they can't fool us, we know they really just want to make the future safe for large breasts. [NYT]

]]>
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:46:39 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=365832&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Showtime Takes Annoying Ads During Movies Seriously ]]> WHO: Showtime
WHAT: Showtime is promoting the upcoming shows by playing banner ads during movies that you paid to watch.
WHERE: Customer Service email
THE QUOTE: "While some viewers may be displeased with this tactic, we have found that a number of our subscribers appreciate learning about the premiere of a series in such a manner. Nevertheless, please note that we take your comments very seriously and have forwarded your concerns to the appropriate people. Thank you for writing to us."

]]>
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:25:57 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=364807&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Tiny Details" Owner Sends Miniature Threats To Former Customer ]]> Tiny Details is a work-at-home company that pays hobbyists to make little dollhousey things. You buy the materials from Tiny Details for $55, make the assigned object(s), and Tiny Details buys them back. Unfortunately, many customers have complained about problems getting payments or refunds from the company over the years—here's their less-than-stellar BBB entry. Yesterday Kristopher Buchan, the owner of Tiny Details, emailed one former customer/client to tell him his complaints amounted to libel. Buchan demanded the customer remove them from teh interweb, and threatened him repeatedly with a lawsuit. And now we're posting about it on The Consumerist! See how that works, Tiny Details?

This is an excerpt of Stephen's original complaint, posted over 18 months ago:

My most recent bout came with a company named Tiny Details based out of Syracuse, NY. My wife was interested in earning some extra money for us from home, a prospect that I found very appealing. What with our son and all, it's really not feasible for her to go to work, so finding her a way to draw income at home was ideal.

I found Tiny Details while researching along those lines. I considered the link pointing to it to be more legitimate than most (and trust me, I know a lot about links). The site seemed a bit unprofessional, which should have been a big tip-off, but I didn't find anyone saying anything negative about it. My wife was very excited at the prospect, as much as she loves arts and crafts.

Unfortunately, I didn't do my research as thoroughly as I should have. It wasn't until after we had bought a kit for my wife that I came across these Tiny Details customer complaints and some more recent warnings about Tiny Details. I also managed to find the Tiny Details Better Business Bureau report. I'm ashamed to say that I missed such glaring stop signs. I guess I must have been dreamy eyed over their false promises rather than incredulous as I rightfully should have been.

At any rate, I've cancelled our order and plan to seek reimbursement through whatever means necessary, up to and including legal action. I don't expect them to make it easy; companies like this never do. I fully suspect it's money that I'll never see again one way or another, in which case I'll take it as $55 worth of valuable education: If it seems too good to be true, it is. Do your research first, and do it right.

It now pops up on the first page of a Google search for "Tiny Details," and apparently Kristopher Buchan just discovered the power of search engines, because yesterday was the first time since posting it that Stephen heard anything from the company. Here are the two emails Stephen received, which his friend Simon posted on his website:
Email #1:

I am writing about the substantively incorrect postings that you have on your website.

I am asking that you remove this point immediately. Your representation of Tiny Details is inacurate and libelous.

I have forwarded this information to our company attorney, along with your domain registration information.

Please govern yourself accordingly.

Kristopher Buchan
President
Tiny Details, LLC

Email #2:

Mr. Ward,

You will be hearing from our attorney.

What you have posted is indeed libel.

I am in the process of seeking your address through your domain registrating information. You will be hearing from us shortly.

Kristopher Buchan

Well, just for fairness' sake, here are some of the complaints about the company we found online on various pages:
From WAHM.com

"You also reminded me that I had sent them a kit (to Christian Miniatures actually) on Nov. the 30th. I added a "Delivery Confirmation" on the package, and it states that they received it on Dec. the 2nd. I had returned a completed kit that needed corrections. It's the 21st already and I've heard nothing. I just called and they just have a recording stating that they're unavailable and to leave a message for a return call (yeah, like THAT'S gonna happen!). So, I just sent them an email with Deliver Receipt Proof. Two weeks ago they had told me they'd never received it, so they couldn't tell me anything about it. The receipt showed that they HAD received it. Hmmm, something fishy's going on here!!!"(posted by rtanza, December 2004)

"Well, I finally heard from Tiny Details today - it seems as though my returned materials were also "never received". I filed a complaint with the BBB. I foolishly did not send my materials with a return receipt so I really can't prove anything... but it's really not the money part of this that is so annoying to me, I just can't stand the idea of folks being taken advantage of like this. Oh well, live and learn..." (posted by scarletbrook, January 2005)

From Rip-Off Report

I decided to try sending them back their own perfect samples as my first sample to see if they were accepted. They made sure to reassure me that they wanted one sample sent back to them so they could inspect it and save me any trouble making a bunch of mistakes. The only problem with that was that I had to send them a sample and wait longer to see if it even passed their ridiclous inspection. Suprise! It didn't pass. Wow, go figure. Now I know I have been scammed. I even sent an e-mail to them saying that I sent them their own sample to see how truthful they were and they rejected it. I have yet to get a response. I'm sure that this is just another scam and that I'm out $55 because I was fooled into falling for it. (posted by Leila, April 2006)

To be fair, we can imagine a build-tiny-objects business has its fair share of customers who think the task will be easier than it looks, and who then blame the company when they can't assemble miniatures at a professional level. (Here's a defense of the company.) In other words: there's a chance Tiny Details isn't a big scam.

But you can't get all ham-fisted with complaints about your service and try to sue former customers into silence, Buchan. Besides, Stephen's initial post is so vague that it doesn't say much more beyond "I decided not to do business with them." Based on Buchan's aggression towards an unhappy former customer who was just stating his opinion, we think Stephen made the right call.

"Tiny Details" [Project Paradox]
"Rather than listening to its critics, president of company threatens blogger with libel lawsuit" [Bloggasm]

RELATED
Tiny Details
"BBB Reliability Report for Tiny Details LLC" [Better Business Bureau]
(Photo: Paul Keleher)

]]>
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:08:49 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361649&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Video Of Comcast's Opening Remarks During Net Neutrality Hearing With Seats Stuffed By Company Employees ]]> Here's a video of Comcast VP David Cohen's opening remarks during the FCC hearing on Monday, the one where Comcast bused in employees. These employees all wore yellow highlighters to identify themselves to company organizers. Note the two guys wearing yellow highlighters in the beginning (one tucked into his metal studded leather jacket, the other tucked into his hair like a daisy). They leave as soon as the talking starts. Guess it wasn't that interesting for them. Also note how tiny this room was. For a hot-button issue, you would think they would get a bigger venue. Unless, of course, they didn't want too many people showing up. ArsTechnica has a good summary with quotes of what went down during the panel discussion. ]]> Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:03:24 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361274&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ This "Quick Vote" is on the front page ... ]]> This "Quick Vote" is on the front page of CNN right now.

Congratulations, Starbucks, on your excellent PR stunt. As for CNN, you have lost your damn mind. [CNN]

]]>
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:25:49 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361199&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Comcast Stacks FCC Hearing Seats With Sleepy Shills ]]> Comcast admitted to paying its employees to sit in at a F.C.C. hearing on net neutrality at the Harvard Law School today, depriving angry protesters from their right to sit in those folding chairs. Despite the venue being filled to over capacity, keeping some people from entering, not everyone inside seemed appreciative of their privilege. One Comcast employee admitted on tape, "I'm just getting paid to hold someone's seat, I don't even know what's going on." According to SaveTheInternet.com, the Comcast employees, "arrived en masse some 90 minutes before the hearing began and occupied almost every available seat, upon which many promptly fell asleep." The stacked audience's behavior was limited to wearing a yellow highlighter, sleeping during the proceedings, and loudly applauding when Comcast VP David Cohen got on the mic.

Comcast PR rep Jen Khoury told Portfolio, Comcast informed our local employees about the hearing and invited them to attend... Some employees did attend, along with many members of the general public," adding that, "For the past week, the Free Press has engaged in a much more extensive campaign to lobby people to attend the hearing on its behalf."

Whichever side you believe, one thing is for certain: Comcast employees are very tired (exhibit A, exhibit B).

]]>
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:29:54 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361095&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Special Ring Sold Only Online, Wowie Zowie! ]]> Just got this PR spam in my inbox. I can't wait to not buy this godawful ring. I just love the body copy. I think my favorite part is where they say that the fact the ring is only sold over the internet further enhances its uniqueness.

CODE ROYAL is the first jewel brand worldwide that combines a costly engraved white agate with a rose golden frame (massive) in 18 carat. White is the color of purity and innocence, of the unbroken light and the absolute truth. What accentuates the color white in a more beautiful way than the deeply symbolic agate gemstone?
Since ancient times, people have cherished this gemstone, ascribing protectional power to it. Agate has a reputation of not only giving protection and security, but also of assisting the process of concentrating on the essential and of preventing depressions.

Complementary to this powerful element, rose gold symbolizes the fire of life and love. Its warm shine suits the color of skin.

The "White Collection" by CODE ROYAL offers over 2'500 combinations containing 50 engraving designs and 5 signet ring types. Moreover, the exclusive service meets any individual customer wishes with engraving family crests and initials by expert hand.

Customers can also choose their signet rings of the "White Collection" in alternative materials such as silver 925, yellow gold 585 or palladium white gold.

"White Collection" signet rings are an absolute must-have for men and women in summer 2008.

D E T A I L S

- "White Collection" prices: silver rings from € 229.- ; golden rings from € 769.-

- Silver 925; yellow, rose and white gold in 585 and 750

- Family crests and initials engraved by expert hand

CODE ROYAL PROVIDES MORE THAN 20.000 VARIATIONS

CODE ROYAL unites the timeless craft of the goldsmith with Jet-Set design using materials of the highest quality.

With more than 20,000 possible combinations, every CODE ROYAL signet ring is handpicked and individually made, and is therefore unique.

100% handmade in Germany - Only finest materials such as sterling silver, yellow, rose and white gold (each in 14 and 18 karat) are used for CODE ROYAL. The expensive agate is exclusively used to adorn these jewels. Each signet ring is made by specialists in seven work steps.

CODE ROYAL IS A REVOLUTION - VIA INTERNET ONLY

Another special feature of CODE ROYAL is the way of distribution. The signet sings can only be purchased on the internet under www.CODE-ROYAL.com. Customers can easily get a detailed three dimensional impression and compose their own personalized signet sing. Even individual initials engraving can be practically chosen online.

]]>
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:37:42 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361050&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ TSA Takes "Rights Of Traveling Public" "Very Seriously" ]]> WHO: The TSA
WHAT: A lawyer responds in general to some of the comments they've seen pop up on their blog.
WHERE: The "Evolution of Security" TSA blog
THE QUOTE: "TSA takes the rights of the traveling public very seriously, and in implementing security screening measures, carefully weighs the intrusiveness of those measures against the need to prevent terrorist attacks involving aircraft. Balancing the same considerations, the courts have long approved searches of airline passengers and their bags for weapons and explosives as constitutionally permissible under what is now commonly referred to as the "administrative search" or "special needs" exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement." (emphasis added)

(Photo: nedrichards)

]]>
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:00:00 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=360763&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Product Placement In Tween Lit Is "Another Opportunity For Authenticity" ]]> lipstick.jpgOur sister site, Jezebel, has posted something awesome about the product placement that's infiltrated the teen lit genre. One particularly sad example features a character called "Mackenzie Blue" whose tastes seem to be for sale before the books have even been written.

Jezzy says:


The author of the books, Tina Wells, is not even a writer by trade; she is, according to the NY Times, "chief executive of Buzz Marketing Group, which advises consumer product companies on how to sell to teenagers and preteenagers." But this is nothing new: Clique series author Lisi Harrison used to be a Senior Director of Development at MTV and is the brains behind such classics as "Room Raiders." (Also, the middle schoolers in the Clique series are apparently grossed out by menstruation, but that's a whole other post. We miss you, Margaret, and your menses loving ways!).

Ms. Wells claims that brand sponsorship will not interfere with Mackenzie Blue's content. "Mackenzie loves Converse...Does Converse want to work with us? I have no clue. But that doesn't negate the fact that Mackenzie loves Converse," Wells told the Times. When reporter Motoko Rich asked her if she would refuse a lucrative contract from Nike even though Mackenzie is a "Converse girl," Wells said, "Maybe another character could become a Nike girl." Don't you see, brands won't be dictating her content at all!

Even worse is Mackenzie Blue publisher Susan Katz. "If you look at Web sites, general media or television, corporate sponsorship or some sort of advertising is totally embedded in the world that tweens live in," Ms. Katz said. "It gives us another opportunity for authenticity." [Cue gagging sounds here. -Ed.]

Please add our voice to the chorus of gagging. Sure, Nancy Drew drove a Mustang, but if we suspected Ford was sponsoring her youthful hijinks... it just wouldn't have been the same.

In Books for Young, Two Views on Product Placement [NYT]
Young Adult Novels Plumb New Depths Of Product Placement [Jezebel]

]]>
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:15:52 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358843&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Starbucks Retraining Employees At 7,100 Stores Next Week ]]> Next Tuesday, Starbucks will close 7,100 corporate-owned stores early to implement a company-wide retraining session on how to make drinks. "The barista re-education is a 'renewed focus on espresso standards,' say Starbucks honchos." We thought that's why they bought the robot espresso machines—so they didn't have to have trained coffee pullers anymore.

The training session is another move by re-instated CEO Howard Schultz to demonstrate a renewed focus on product quality, although it also sounds a little bit like a PR stunt:

"Our unprecedented level of commitment to and investment in our people will provide them with the tools and resources they need to exceed the expectations of our customers," CEO Howard Schultz said in a written release. "We believe that this is a bold demonstration of our commitment to our core and a reaffirmation of our coffee leadership."

(Thanks to Adam!)

"Starbucks closing 7,000-plus stores—for several hours — to retrain baristas" [Chicago Tribune]
"Starbucks stores to close for espresso training" [Wall Street Journal]

RELATED
"Starbucks: Say Good-Bye To Breakfast Sandwiches, Hello To $1 Coffee"
(Photo: Travelin' Librarian)

]]>
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:51:52 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358546&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Monster Responds To "Monster Cables, Monster Ripoff" ]]> rebuttal.jpgThe Monster Cables Public Relations department sent in a two-page response to our post, "Monster Cables, Monster Ripoff. Without a shadow of a doubt, this is one issue that they are definitely taking seriously. Read their official company rebuttal statement, inside...

Response from Monster Cable on Article in the Consumerist

Monster would like to acknowledge and respond to the publishing of the Monster pricing from an employee at RadioShack in the article titled "Monster Cables, Monster Ripoff: 80% markups."

The article can be misread that consumers are paying inappropriate prices charged by our retailers for Monster Cable products. The article misleads the reader in citing retailer markups of 80% as if the retailer makes 80% profit margin on products that they sell. Anyone in retail knows that one does not calculate profit by markups, but by profit margins made on the sale as a ratio of what they paid for it. So in the example of the 19ft. HDMI-DVI cable that was highlighted as Retail $179.95, wholesale of $99.40, that's a profit margin of 44%, which is totally in line with what retailers choose to sell accessory items like Monster Cable. Also the DVI and the S-Video cable cited are both discontinued products using old cable technology. Most of the products listed in the article are 37% to 39% profit margins. This is much less than profit margins on other consumer products like clothing, jewelry, furniture, and accessories to other consumer products.

It's also misleading when the tone of the article alludes to Monster Cable ripping off consumers, when Monster cannot legally set retail pricing. This is clearly up to the retailer. However in defense of retailers of consumer electronics, it is typical that small items warrant higher profit margins, while large items like TV's have small profit margins. The consumer clearly wins in the electronics category.

We would also like to point out that Monster makes the highest quality cables in the world, but always with a variety of price points for the consumer to choose from. For example, with today's most popular digital connection, HDMI, the consumer has a wide range of performance choices with four models of Monster Advanced Speed Rated HDMI Cables, ranging from $49.95 to $99.95. The performance of each of these Speed Rated cables is independently verified by Simplay Labs www.simplayhd.com, so our customers know exactly the performance they are paying for. In addition, these prices are in line or lower than other high performance cables offered by Monster's competitors at retail locations throughout the country.

There is also a comment about digital cables not making a difference and that the only difference in digital cables is the price. This is simply not the case. HDMI Licensing, LLC, the group that develops the HDMI specification, has published two different cable speeds for the current 1.3 specification: Standard Speed at 2.23 Gbps, and High Speed at 4.95 Gbps, which is known as HDMI 1.3 Category 2. For more information, go to www.hdmi.org.

In fact, Steve Venuti, Vice President of Marketing for HDMI Licensing, LLC, stated in a recent Widescreen Review article:
http://www2.widescreenreview.com/127venuti.pdf

"...HDMI evolves as it continues to react to the demands of the marketplace. With the introduction of HDMI 1.3 in 2006, HDMI doubled the bandwidth of the specification, and with that, gave manufacturers the ability to design products that can output and receive signals at unprecedented levels...And where there is increased bandwidth, there is increased demand on the cable to deliver the HDMI signal."

This clearly states that not all HDMI digital cables are the same. Buying the best cables possible will insure that one always gets the best possible digital picture for the components they own.

For those who want to get the real facts on HDMI, please visit www.monstercable.com/HDMI/advancedhdmi.asp for the following videos:

1. The Constant Evolution of HDMI with Steve Venuti, Vice President of Marketing, HDMI Licensing, LLC
2. Certified HDMI Cable Performance with Joseph Lias, President of Simplay Labs, LLC

For those who want technical information on why there are different levels of HDMI Cables, one can reference the white paper on HDMI at http://www.monstercable.com/HDMI/whitepaper.asp, where you will learn about why different HDMI cables are needed.

For those who want to get an inside look on the testing of Monster's HDMI cables, visit www.monstercable.com/HDMI/advancedhdmi.asp for an eye opening video of Monster's quality R&D and testing.

The digital TV revolution is moving fast, as one sees from the introduction of 240Hz displays from TI and Ultra High Definition Displays from Samsung at CES this year. These advanced displays paves the way for vastly improved high definition components that will need even higher speed HDMI cables, all of which are available today from Monster's Advanced Speed Rated cables.

For those who want to know more about higher definition, Monster and Disney have partnered together on a DVD that educates customers on the various levels of higher definition and how to buy and set up for higher definition TV. The DVD is called The Higher Definition Home Theater Experience, and we would like to offer it at no charge to everyone who is visiting this site by sending your shipping address to the following email: pr@monstercable.com.

Monster has always made the highest quality products at reasonable prices. We stand behind the retailers that offer great service and advice to our customers at a fair profit and we hope that this additional information clarifies some of the confusion that the article might have generated.

Response from Consumerist on Monster Cable Response on Article in the Consumerist

1. As decided in Leegin v. PSKS, this statement, "Monster cannot legally set retail pricing. This is clearly up to the retailer..." is patently false. See "Supreme Court Allows Manufacturers To Dictate Minimum Prices, Screws Consumers"

2. Their response neatly sidesteps a giant section of the original post, so I'll reproduce it here:

The worst part isn't really the markup. Stereo equipment routinely has markups of 80 to 100 to 200% by the time it hits the shelves. It's the initial inflated price, and how gadget stores try to push the cables so hard, telling people that Monster cables offer superior picture and sound then what you would get with another cable. But that simply isn't the case. Our sister site Gizmodo ran a battery of tests and found Monster cables are for the most part, completely unnecessary. (see The Truth About Monster Cable - Grand Finale (Part III), HDMI Cable Battlemodo Resumes, The Truth About Monster Cable, Part 2 (Verdict: Cheap Cables Keep Up...Usually), and The Truth About Monster Cable).
3. So the paragons of the truth about HDMI cables are a Vice President of Marketing, and the Disney corporation?

4. Monoprice.com.

PREVIOUSLY: Monster Cables, Monster Ripoff: 80% Markups

]]>
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:18:38 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358006&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Direct Marketing Association Lies About Telemarketers' Contribution To Economy ]]> goldbowtie.jpgIn order to make itself look a respectable and unfairly maligned industry, The Direct Marketing Association (the same people behind OptOutprescreen.com) likes to tout how greatly telemarketing contributes to the American economy. The Denialism blog scoured the DMA press releases and website found the profit they say telemarketing generates varies wildly from year to year, and sometimes within the same year.

"Telemarketing Sales" 2001: $93,800,000,000
"In 2001...customers purchased $661 billion in goods and services - accounting for almost six percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP)."
Sales to consumers in 2001: $274,200,000,000
"Telemarketing Sales" 2002: $100,000,000,000

Telemarketing must be a very volatile industry.

The Direct Marketing Association's New Math [Denialism Blog]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:00:00 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=354172&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Coffee Shop Accidentally Forwards Embarassing Internal Emails To Customer ]]> Reader X sends us an internal email chain that was accidentally forwarded by some executives at Beaner's Coffee.

The customer was writing in to inquire as to when trans fats would be eliminated from Beaner's products. In addition to a cheerful reply, said customer was also treated to the internal email chain instructing the Vice President of Operations on how to "sidestep the question."

beaner2.jpg
beaner3.jpg
beaner4.jpg
beaner5.jpg Well, that's embarrassing.

]]>
Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:23:41 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=352621&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ UnitedHealth Takes Potential $1.3 Billion Fine Seriously ]]> unitedhealth.jpgWHO: UnitedHealth Group, an heath insurance provider.
WHAT: An investigation by the California Department of Insurance found evidence of 133,000 violations of state laws and regulations regarding payments for medical care.
WHERE:Health plan faces fines of $1.33 billion [LA Times]
THE QUOTE:""Our integration issues and challenges shouldn't affect our providers, and they shouldn't affect our members," he said. "We're very regretful about that."

At the same time, UnitedHealth executives downplayed the effect on members and patient care, characterizing the problems largely as administrative errors. Still, they said, the company was taking the allegations seriously."

]]>
Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:19:00 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=350303&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ (Product) Red Responds To Dell Pricing Controversy ]]> bonoreddell.jpgResponding to a Dell pricing controversy that boiled over last week, a spokesperson for (Product) Red, an initiative whereby company color some of their products red and donate a portion of the profits to an AIDS fighting charity, left a comment on our blog to try dispel some of the confusion they felt had arisen over the issue. At stake was a computer Dell sells for $1,299 that you can get in the (Product) Red version for $1,599, with $80 of it going to the Global Fund. What about the other $220, asked gizmo blog Engadget? Well, we could tell them that it's because you're getting Windows Vista Ultimate and Microsoft Office and Student 2007 instead of Windows XP and Microsoft Works, but we'll let the comment from Bich Ngoc Cao of (Product) Red do the talking...

We've been following all of the discussion that our recent partnership announcement has created. While most of it has been very positive, it seems there is a lot of confusion around the pricing of the (PRODUCT) RED offering. Above and beyond the entry level XPS ONE, the (PRODUCT) RED version offers Windows Vista Ultimate and Microsoft Home Office and Student, a $300 value of upgrades when purchasing through DELL.

We're aware that not everyone will need or want these upgrades. (RED) is not about buying something for charity - it is about doing good while you are buying something you need. For those consumers who are in the market for a DELL XPS ONE with WINDOWS VISTA ULTIMATE, the (PRODUCT) RED option gives them the opportunity to get all of these features AND trigger an $80 contribution to the Global Fund to help fight AIDS in Africa, at no additional cost. For those consumers who are not in the market for this type of full-featured experience, they have the option to purchase another DELL PC that meets their needs.

(RED) is just one tool for people to do good - it doesn't replace the need or desire for charity donations, volunteering or getting involved in other ways. It is simply a choice when you're out shopping for something you need.

Most of the discussion demonstrates an enthusiasm for these partnerships and a desire to have more (PRODUCT) RED PCs available at a broader price range. We are also very excited about the potential of the DELL & MICROSOFT partnerships - which are just starting with these products. These new partnerships will help increase overall awareness of the AIDS epidemic in Africa and increase contributions to buy lifesaving ARV treatment for those who cannot afford it.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact (RED) at info@joinred.com.

Thank you,
bn
(RED)

It seems the internets are better at getting angry than doing math. Would donating $300 directly to the Global Fund do more good? Absolutely, but not everyone shopping for a Dell is going to do that, while they might, however, check off a different box at checkout and opt for the (Product) Red computer. Last time we checked, $57 million donated to fighting AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria was a good thing.

PREVIOUSLY: Is Dell's Pricey (Project) Red PC A Ripoff?

]]>
Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:53:27 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=349470&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Is Dell's Pricey (Project) Red PC A Ripoff? ]]> Over at Engadget there is a debate going on about Microsoft and Dell's collaboration on a (Project) Red XPS PC that is $300 more than the standard XPS, with $80 going towards AIDS relief.

The controversy comes from the fact that the $300 "upgrade" to the standard system is for Microsoft software only—leading some to conclude that the world would be better off if you just donated the $300 to charity, rather than spending it on a (Project) Red PC that comes with expensive software you may not need and can find cheaper elsewhere.

Not to rag on a charities, but these are the things that everyone should think about before making a donation or a purchase that "benefits charity." Some people will probably want and value the software (and the pretty red computer) and think it's a good deal. Other people will disagree. Ultimately, it's your money.

Dell's XPS One (PRODUCT) RED is a charitable rip off [Engadget]


]]>
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:27:06 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=349207&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Best Takes In-Store Display Cashing In On Heath Ledger's Death Very Seriously ]]> heathledgervideos.jpgWHO: Best Buy
WHAT: Hours after actor Heath Ledger's death, a Best Buy store already had a table set up with his DVDs on sale, urging customers to "remember a great actor through his great performances."
THE QUOTE: "Please be certain Best Buy takes matters of this nature very seriously. In reviewing your concerns with the management team at our Mission Valley store, they have concluded that the display was inappropriate in light of Mr. Ledger's recent passing and have removed it from the sales floor."

(Thanks to Samuel!)

]]>
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:46:00 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348429&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dell: Let's Ship Tiny CDs In Massive Boxes! ]]> Dell has promised to stop shipping individual CDs in 10x19x10 boxes after Christian over at Technologist for Hire posted a rant about Dell's growing love for wasteful packaging.

The company I work for orders all of their computers from Dell. About 4 months ago we started receiving random Adobe Acrobat Standard CDs & licenses for free with every single computer that we purchase. We did not request these CDs. At first, they came inside of the box with the computer. Soon, they started arriving in a padded envelope. After that, they began arriving in their own box, complete with paper padding, and a padded envelope. We have received well over 100 of these.
Sean, one of Dell's blog-watching ninjas, initially responded with the usual PR prattle: Dell is a green company, killing trees is wrong, the planet is nice, big packages are bad, etc, etc. Surprisingly, he sent a followup email that contained a meaningful commitment:
Christian, just wanted to circle back and let you know that we're working this now. As much as we would like this to be a very simple fix it isn't. But you do have our commitment that we will have this fixed in the next six months. Two things we are looking at:

1. Option to exclude all manuals and CDs from packaging at time of order. And, an option to have one set delivered for multiple systems.

2. A move to packaging alternatives

We'll be sure to keep you posted.

Best,
Sean

We look forward to Dell renouncing its membership in the stupid shipping gang by June.

Dell and the environment: green is out, brown is in [Technologist For Hire]
Update on Dell's Environmental Impact [Technologist For Hire]

]]>
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:03:19 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=346830&view=rss&microfeed=true