<![CDATA[Consumerist: Postal Service]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Postal Service]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/postal service http://consumerist.com/tag/postal service <![CDATA[ FedEx Turns Shipment Of DVDs Into Can Of Old House Paint ]]> John at Needcoffee.com writes that he's come to expect the occasional "damaged in transit" theft of items from packages he ships or receives, at least through the U.S Postal Service. With private carriers, however, he notes that he's always had better luck. But last week he opened a box of DVDs shipped to him via FedEx to discover a rusty can of $5 house paint.

I opened a box I received from FedEx and pulled out of a couple of DVDs and then saw what looked like a rusty lid of something. At first, I thought nothing of it, since you can get DVDs packaged in all kinds of weird shit. I thought it might have been a fake film canister of some sort or...something. In retrospect, it might have been the Limited Edition Paint Can "This Old House: The Complete Series." But when I pulled it out I saw it was what you're seeing up there: an authentic $4.99 rusty gallon can of Satinwood Interior Latex Flat Wall Paint. (And please don't mock the wallpaper, it came with the house.)

I called the sender of the package and said, "What's with sending me a can of paint?"

He said, "What the hell are you talking about: a can of paint?" And you can guess where the conversation went from there.

It took a while for John to track down someone from FedEx to investigate, but apparently they're on the case now:

Regardless, the claims process is supposed to be underway, and FedEx Claims was helpful when I got them on the line—after they inexplicably transferred me to somebody who worked somewhere else within the company and had no idea why I was suddenly on their phone and then...on the second call they transferred me into their internal phonemail system, where I was prompted for my mailbox number. But anyway, the third call was fine. Let's just see how they react to this.

"Indiana Jones and the Satinwood Latex Flat Wall Paint" [Needcoffee.com]

]]>
Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:23:30 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5032250&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Comcast Won't Stop Sending You Junk Mail Because "You Might Move" ]]> UPDATE: Comcast has now removed Brad from its mailing lists for really reals.

Reader Brad is fed up with junk mail from Comcast. He asked the company if it would be possible to be taken off the junk mail list to which Comcast replied, "We are unable to remove a non-active account from the mailing list. The reason being is, if or when you move out of this address, we would not be sending offers and possibly prevent the new owner from receiving a special offer," and that would be a crime against humanity, we suppose. Is there a way to get Comcast to stop sending junk mail? Brad's letter and our response, inside..

Dear Consumerist Editors and Readers,

I'd like to share my Comcastic experience with asking Comcast to stop sending me junk mail. I get more from them than any other source. They first told me it would be taken care of, but after some time of receiving more and more Comcast junk mail I called back, and they said, "No, we can't take you off our mailing list, (get this...) because you might move." !!!! (Documentation below)

A received no reply to my "feel-free-to-contact-us-if-you-have-any-more-questions" follow-up. I forwarded this Service Rep's email to Comcast's web persona, Mr. Frank Eliason. He seems very responsive in his twitter posts and in an interview I heard. But unfortunately, after about 10 days I have received no reply.

How can I stop receiving unwanted mail, if Comcast says, "We don't care what you don't want, we'll send it anyway in case you move"?

-Brad

Comcast's letter:====================

Hello Mr. Brad ********,

Holly was correct in stating we are unable to remove a non-active account from the mailing list.

The reason being is, if or when you move out of this address, we would not be sending offers and possibly prevent the new owner from receiving a special offer.

I hope this answers your inquiry. Please feel free to contact us if you have any more questions.

Thank you for choosing Comcast.

Sincerely,
Chenise
Comcast Customer Care

One approach to stop Comcast's junk mail is to submit a "prohibitory order against sender of pandering advertisement in the mails," also known as form 1500. This form was originally drafted to stop mail that customers found "erotically arousing or sexually provocative." Despite the non-sexual nature of Comcast's mail, this order can still be applied. Once this form is accepted by the USPS it would make any further junk mail a violation of this order. The major problem with this is that the USPS is notorious for not enforcing the orders, in which case you are back to square one.

Another avenue that might be worth investigating is Comcast's self-appointed go-to guy for unresolved issues. Scott Westerman, an area Vice President for Comcast, writes in his blog:

But at the base of it all is our desire to build great customer relationships, one at a time. That’s our common passion at Comcast.

If you have an unresolved issue, we want to hear about it. Our local teams are the first best resource. 1-800-Comcast will connect you with the office that serves your area. But if the chain of command isn’t working, you can directly connect with us, via email at we_can_help@cable.comcast.com or @comcastcares on twitter.

We’re listening.

Scott Westerman
Area Vice President - Comcast
scott.westerman@comcast.net
@comcastscott on Twitter

Additionally, our readers always have some tricks up their sleeves. What are some of your tricks for stopping junk mail?

(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:05:16 EDT Jay Slatkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5021718&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Don't Reuse That USPS Priority Box, It's Illegal ]]>

7 News in Denver reports that a Colorado man has been officially warned that reusing a United States Postal Service "Priority Mail" cardboard box is a violation of federal law. We're not even talking about mail fraud but simply reusing them for other types of shipping. Could reusing these boxes actually be a federal crime? Find out more about this outlaw...

Like many others, Gary Adler reuses these boxes after receiving them or sometimes just finds them near the dumpster. Typically, he turns the box inside out to so that it's brown on the outside, then uses the box as a normal shipping box. However, the postal service says this is against postal regulations and if he does it again he could be charged with misuse of postal property. Nicole Reiter of the USPS said, "Our Priority Mail and Express Mail boxes are, bottom line, supposed to be used for that service. That is what they are intended for." She also claims this regulation is actually helping the customer, "enforcing the no-recycling rule would keep postal rates low for everyone."

We believe that a box is a box and if it's clearly marked then why should it matter if it's an "ex" priority mail box? Given the unholy volume of junk mail with which the USPS turns a profit, it's no wonder that the postal service shows so little concern for the environment.

Reusing Cardboard Postal Boxes Illegal [7 News] (Thanks to James for sending this in!)
(Photo: 7 News)

]]>
Thu, 01 May 2008 09:53:12 EDT Jay Slatkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5007435&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Do Not Mail" Junk Mail Registry Called For By Green Group ]]> con_donotmail-1.jpg ForestEthics has started a petition to enact a Do Not Mail registry, similar to the one that's sort of in effect (when marketers choose to abide by it) for telemarketing. Their reasoning: junk mail is enormously wasteful and damaging to the environment. We agree, but we're in favor of the registry for the simple reason that less junk mail means fewer uninvited distractions, ID theft risks, and trash we'd have to deal with every day.

From ForestEthics' press release:

ForestEthics is urging Americans to sign a petition at www.DoNotMail.org demanding a national registry that will finally offer citizens control over the unsolicited coupons, credit cards, catalogs and advertisements that fill their mailboxes on a daily basis.

The production of the 100 billion pieces of junk mail that Americans annually receive requires more than 100 million trees, while producing as much global warming emissions as 3.7 million cars.

Junk mail distributed in the United States currently accounts for 30% of all the mail delivered in the world, though 44% of it goes to landfills unopened.

Polls consistently show that between 80 and 90% of respondents dislike junk mail and are eager to find a mechanism that will address their frustration and concerns about the problem.

Vermont State Representative Christopher Pearson, who is sponsoring Do Not Mail legislation in Vermont, added, "If our experience in Vermont is any indication, Americans are eager to assert their right to protect their privacy, their right to stop needless waste, and their support for a Do Not Mail Registry."

The downside—we think a Do Not Mail registry would land a devastating blow against the USPS, which relies on all that crap to make any money. But seriously, we'd pay to support the USPS if it meant cutting junk mail in half.

DoNotMail.org

RELATED
"Stop getting junk mail" [DoNotMail.org]
"Phone numbers and websites to opt out of junk mail" [DoNotMail.org]

]]>
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:54:59 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367445&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The News; Dance Like Nobody's Buying ]]>
• Coulda saved a lotta trouble just by reading a little thing called "The Laws of Supply and Demand." [LAT] " 'Boutique' Gasoline Blends Not Boosting Prices, Study Finds"
• They paved paradise and put up a parking lot. [LAT] "Six Flags May Sell Its Magic Mountain Park"
• "We had a flat tire" only works so much. [CT] "United Airlines loses USPS Contract For Tardiness"
• The Googleplex paid him off in lifetime supply of candy, hair combings. [LAT] "Lawmaker's Porn Suit Against Google Dropped"

]]>
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:38:57 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=182879&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Round 2: Worst Company in America: US Postal Service vs. H&R Block ]]> Round 2: Fight!

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

Previously:

"I have heard some real horror stories from people that attempt to get their taxes done there by what I can only assume are chimps in people clothes. I find it especially terrifying because when your taxes get messed up you are being screwes over not once, but twice," said Christy, H&R Block submitter.

Wikipedia H&R Block fun fact: "On November 30, 2004, Ken Jennings lost after winning 74 straight appearance on the national quiz show Jeopardy! when he incorrectly responded "What is FedEx?" instead of "What is H&R Block?" on the Final Jeopardy! clue. The clue read "Most of this firm's 70,000 seasonal white-collar employees work only four months a year."

H&R Block subsequently offered Jennings personal finance and tax preparation services for life."

]]>
Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:39:26 EST popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=156496&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Postal Service #1 on iTunes Music Store ]]> There's one good thing to come out of this Apple/The Postal Service flap: It looks like The Postal Service's Such Great Heights is dominating the iTunes Video store today. At $2 a download, hopefully they're getting a little money out of the whole deal. (Thanks, ifdu400!)

]]>
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:00:19 EST consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=150312&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apple's Lifted Video Provokes Band Response ]]> We're a bit behind on this story, but we figured we'd get our finger on it before it got away from us. Apple straight-up ripped off the video for The Postal Service's song Such Great Heights to promote its use of Intel chips in its new Macs. (The Postal Service is a band, not our U.S. Mail.) Both videos were directed by the same two people, which makes it unquestionably clear that Apple and their ad agency, TBWA\Chiat Day, intended to clone the video shot-for-shot from the beginning.

The Postal Service's Ben Gibbard had this to say:

It has recently come to our attention that Apple Computers' new television commercial for the Intel chip features a shot-for-shot recreation of our video for 'Such Great Heights' made by the same filmmakers responsible for the original. We did not approve this commercialization and are extremely disappointed with both parties that this was executed without our consultation or consent.
Like we said, we're a bit late to the game on this one, but we think there might just be more to say about this in the future. If nothing else, it does Apple no good to look like a copycat (even if polishing old ideas is something at which Apple excels).

Every time one opens at iPod there is a sticker that says 'Don't Steal Music.' Perhaps with the introduction of the iPod video, Apple should be heeding its own advice: Don't Steal Videos.

Speaking of not stealing, image from Frederik Samuel.

]]>
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:54:45 EST consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=150090&view=rss&microfeed=true