<![CDATA[Consumerist: ordering]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: ordering]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/ordering http://consumerist.com/tag/ordering <![CDATA[ Man Tries To Buy From "The Camera Professionals," Fails ]]>

"The Camera Professionals" are not actually that professional, nor do they have cameras to sell you. That's what ZDNet reporter Josh Taylor discovered when he decided to take their Google AdWord bait and buy a camcorder they were offering for nearly $300 less than other stores. He didn't expect much success, and he was richly rewarded:

While stories like mine are sadly not that uncommon, I’m still absolutely stumped at what kind of scheme The Camera Professionals is trying to pull off. They never tried to upsell me, they never charged my credit card, they simply appeared to have taken an order for an item they seemingly have no intention of trying to fill.

After reading complaints online about the company, Taylor was expecting a call-to-confirm scam that would lead to an aggressive upsell, and a subsequent out of stock notice if he didn't take the bait. Instead, he simply got nowhere with them. We wonder if it had to do with his manner of payment (Amex).

What's funniest about the experience is that the company actually paid a small amount of money to take Taylor's order:

But that’s not all. Since I clicked on a Google sponsored link to visit them in the first place, they actually paid Google for the privilege of taking an order. It wasn’t much - looks to be about a nickel a click for the search term “Vixia HF10″ - but it’s still a nickel more than they made off my order.

"The worst shopping experience on the web?" [The ToyBox / ZDNet]

]]>
Consumerist-5009849 Tue, 20 May 2008 13:38:46 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5009849&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Amazon Screws Up Mother's Day Order ]]>

When Amazon works, it's a great example of what man and machine can do together to make shopping easier. When it doesn't work, you're stuck with a higher-priced camera from Wal-Mart and a second camera you thought was canceled shipped from Amazon, with a refund taking 3-5 days to go through.

My siblings and I decided to go in together and purchase my Mom a nice camera for Mother's Day. She's a nice lady, and is getting tired of the one she has, so it seemed like a good idea. The BAD idea was trying to purchase it (along with a few accessories) from Amazon. But, they had it for a great price, and with the free shipping it seemed like a no-brainer.

So I placed my order on 5/1...all seemed well on the Amazon front. I got a confirmation email after placing the order letting me know that it would be shipped on 5/6. It's never taken more than 3 days for an Amazon order to show up in the past, so I figured it would be fine. After a couple of days, I logged in to Amazon to check up on it, and that's when I should have gotten worried.

Instead of showing my orders, there was an error message letting me know that there was a problem with Amazon, but rest-assured, they're working on it and it should be fixed shortly. Right. It gave me the same message the next day, and the next, so on 5/6 I sent Amazon an email asking them to check the status of the order, as it was for Mother's Day and I needed it by then.

I received a reply email later that day from Naresh letting me know that he would need 1-2 business days to research and he'd get back to me.

After two days (5/8) and no response, I decided to call Amazon. I spoke to a male representative (and I'm pounding my head against the wall for not catching his name, but I didn't) who let me know that he couldn't find my order, either. I explained the situation (it's for my Mom, I need it asap, etc), and he let me know that I could place the order again if I needed it quickly. This wasn't to my liking, but I wasn't about to disappoint my Mom (nor face the scorn of my siblings), so I asked when it could be delivered. His answer? Monday. This was not the answer I was looking for, so I asked him to please cancel the order, and I would purchase it locally. He said he would put a note on my account for the order to be cancelled.

So I set off into a raging thunderstorm to the closest store that had the same model camera. Wal-Mart. This is a story for another day, but I ended up paying waaaay more thanks to Wal-Mart's absolutely ridiculous price-matching policy. So, I'm out some cash, a lot of time, and it ruined my hair. Thanks, Amazon!  

Then, today [Friday May 9], I decided (just for kicks) to check my Amazon account. Lo and behold, it's fixed! Apparently, my order should be shipped on 5/11 or 5/12. Wait, what??? I am not a happy camper at this point.

So, I just spent another 30 minutes on the phone with Christine H. Bottom line? Amazon can (will) not cancel the order, and I can expect to receive a 2nd camera in the near future.

While she did try to help me as much as she could (and she was very nice), it was obvious that Amazon's policies limited what (if any) help she could offer me. When I explained that my bank account does not runneth over (thanks to a hefty veterinarian bill) and that, if charged, I would be overdrawn, she said that she would give me an advance refund on the shipment. In 3-5 days, I'll see my money back in the bank (never mind that Amazon will CHARGE my account as soon as it ships). She did send me an email explaining the very involving process of getting an overdraft fee credited by Amazon, but at this point, I'm just going to suck it up and transfer some emergency (i.e. DON'T TOUCH) money into the account.

It's not exactly what I would normally qualify as an emergency, but if it will keep me from having to deal with Amazon again, it's worth it. 

Bottom line? Amazon is the Grinch who stole Mother's Day...Boo to you, Amazon! (And I still haven't heard back from Naresh.)

Amanda

Fine, it was a one-off problem, mistakes happen and all that. But why do customer service reps promise to return calls that they never return? This seems to happen across the industry, and it may be the easiest way to improve customer service.

]]>
Consumerist-5008616 Sun, 11 May 2008 12:00:50 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5008616&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sam's Club Charges More For Bulk Check Purchases ]]> con_samsclubcheckprices.jpg An alert reader noticed that something looked fishy on the Sam's Club order screen when he was ordering new checks—if you decide to order double the number of checks, your price-per-box magically goes up the tiniest bit. We figure the amount is so small that most people don't even notice it, or they notice it but figure they'll still save time and shipping so it's worth the 3-5 cents extra. Still, it's a sneaky thing for a bulk discount store to do.

(Thanks to Eric!)

]]>
Consumerist-357272 Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:48:41 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=357272&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ $100 iPhone Credit Mysteriously Evaporates ]]> con_iphonecredit.jpg Dawn writes to tell us that she and her husband both received the $100 iPhone credits last fall, but when she tried to use them on December 4th she discovered one of the credits had a zero balance. An Apple CSR told her to go ahead and make her purchase without it, and the $100 would be credited immediately to her Visa. Unfortunately, she took his advice.

It's now been almost two months since the purchase, and things still haven't been sorted out.

A credit of $58.10 was applied to my account on January 25, 2008, however there is no sign of the other $41.90. Along the way, apparently to apologize for the errors, an Apple gift card with a supposed balance of $100 was sent to my home. However, a representative checked the balance and found that it was not even correct! Only $47 was on the card.
It looks like someone decided that the second card was just a reimbursement for the outstanding credit, but they didn't even get that amount correct. It only takes a few minutes to credit a VISA account, Apple. Open up one of those new cookie-sheet laptops you're so proud of and take care of it!

(Thanks to Dawn!)

]]>
Consumerist-350938 Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:40:13 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=350938&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pizza Hut Announces Nationwide Mobile Ordering ]]> con_pizzahutmobilelogo.jpg Pizza Hut may not be the world's best pizza, but now that they've rolled out nationwide mobile ordering—via their website on any web-enabled phone, or text message on the rest—they're certainly one of the easiest pizza joints to order from.

Within five years, Pizza Hut aims to earn half its revenue from orders placed via computers and mobile phones, he said.

Pizza Hut is not the first to offer mobile ordering services, but the Dallas-based company says its service is the broadest and most comprehensive.

Domino's in September gave customers with Web-enabled phones the option to place mobile orders at nearly half of its 5,100 U.S. restaurants.

According to Reuters, Papa John's has been offering text-message ordering nationwide since November.

"Pizza Hut rolls out nationwide mobile ordering" [Reuters]

]]>
Consumerist-345867 Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:57:59 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=345867&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apple Files Patent App To Allow Wireless Ordering At Stores ]]> con_iphonewirlessordering.jpg Apple has applied to patent a wireless ordering system that would allow shoppers to place orders from, for example, their iPhones as they approached, oh, let's say a Starbucks, bypassing an ordering line altogether and going straight to the pick-up counter. The system would also allow stores to keep data on repeat customers to speed up future transactions.

Customers might tap a button to order their favorite drink, say a double-shot mocha, as they stroll up to the nearest coffee shop. When the drink is ready go to, the device—such as an iPhone—would chime or blink to let the thirsty one know it's time to scoop up the order at the counter.

The patent puts Apple's partnership with Starbucks in a new light. The technology promises to morph Apple from the business of simply selling gadgets and music and movies that can be played on those devices into an intermediary in all kinds of exchanges.

We've seen various schemes to work cellphones into the transaction space over the years, and so far nothing's caught on. But considering how much market share the iPhone has already grabbed, we wouldn't be surprised if by this time next year we go into a Starbucks and see iPhones chiming like upscale versions of those wireless pager coasters restaurants use.

"Apple's Piping Hot Innovation" [Forbes via Dealerscope]

RELATED
Patent Application For "Wireless communication system" [US Patent Office]

]]>
Consumerist-339308 Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:43:43 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=339308&view=rss&microfeed=true