<![CDATA[Consumerist: one way contract]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: one way contract]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/one way contract http://consumerist.com/tag/one way contract <![CDATA[ New York Agency Wants Sprint To Pay ETF To Dropped Customers ]]> sprinthappy.jpgThe New York State Consumer Protection Board suggest that Sprint pay $200, the amount it would have charged customers to end their contracts, to the 1000 customers it dumped for calling customer service too much. Mindy Brockstein, the board's chairperson, told the AP:
"These former Sprint customers will have to purchase new phones and incur other expenses and inconveniences if they want to continue receiving wireless service," Bockstein said. "Sprint Nextel should do more to improve the quality of its customer service and this is a good place to start."
Brockstein says she's send a letter to Sprint requesting the payout, and if they refuse, she will be approaching New York lawmakers who she claims are already interested in creating a "Wireless Customer Bill of Rights."

A Sprint insider told Consumerist that Sprint was only dropping customers who were scamming them for undeserved credits. Sprint declined to comment on Brockstein's letter, as they had not yet received it.

NY Agency Wants Sprint to Pay Customers [Forbes]
(Photo:Maulleigh)

PREVIOUSLY: Sprint Drops You Because You Call Customer Service Too Much

]]>
Consumerist-278134 Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:41:31 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=278134&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sprint Drops You Because You Call Customer Service Too Much ]]> If you persistently insist that Sprint fix their numerous errors you will be dropped as a customer, according to reader Michael. He's been having trouble with Sprint but instead of resolving his problem, they've decided to drop him as a customer according to a letter he received yesterday. The letter reads:

"Our records indicate that over the past year, we have received frequent calls from you regarding your billing or other general account information. While we have worked to resolve your issues and questions to the best of our ability, the number of inquiries you have made to us during this time has led us to determine that we are unable to meet your current wireless needs..."
Michael says:
I have called them alot over the past year, but those calls were to have them fix their errors. I've always been polite to their employees (whether it be over the phone or in a Sprint store). I've never missed a payment and have always paid my bill early. I've never asked them for discounts or freebies.

This is ridiculous. They terminate me because I call customer service too much? I call customer service to have them fix THEIR errors.

Sorry, Michael. Fixing their errors is costing them too much money. They have to get rid of you and find someone who won't complain so much. It's just too bad for you, Michael, that you paid full price for an expensive phone that you probably would not be able to use at its full effectiveness at another carrier... even if it weren't defective.

Michael writes:

Hi. I and a number of others have recently received letters from Sprint that our service is being terminated because we call Sprint's customer service too much.

I've only been a Sprint customer since December 2005. I joined on the $30 SERO plan. This was around the time the SERO plans first became available and they still included unlimited text messaging. Since then, I've called numerous times because I keep being charged $10.00 for the unlimited text messages. Every month I call and every month they only credit my account $8.00. This happens every month. This past month I had also been having problems with my Samsung IP-830W. I did go to my local repair center to deal with that, but they stuck me with a refurbished Treo 700P with non-functioning space-bar and menu key. I've been calling customer service pretty much every day for the past month trying to get this fixed too (getting an equivalent replacement). I purchased this IP-830W full price (~$699) back in March of this year. I've spoken with numerous customer service supervisors about this and they've offered me a blue Treo 755P. They told me they would put a temporary credit on my account for the same price as the blue Treo 755P and then send me a return kit for this defective Treo 700P the repair center left me with. The temporary credit is on my account, but no one has been able to order this blue Treo 755P. I also have not received the return kit.

Yesterday, I received a letter from Sprint that says they're terminating service to me. Their reason:

"Our records indicate that over the past year, we have received frequent calls from you regarding your billing or other general account information. While we have worked to resolve your issues and questions to the best of our ability, the number of inquiries you have made to us during this time has led us to determine that we are unable to meet your current wireless needs..."

I have called them a lot over the past year, but those calls were to have them fix their errors. I've always been polite to their employees (whether it be over the phone or in a Sprint store). I've never missed a payment and have always paid my bill early. I've never asked them for discounts or freebies.

This is ridiculous. They terminate me because I call customer service too much? I call customer service to have them fix THEIR errors.

Sprint writes:
http://consumerist.com/assets/resources/2007/07/sprintdropsyou-thumb.jpg

Michael, if you (and anyone else who is having this problem ) do want to stay with Sprint and get this resolved, you might want to try the Consumerist hotline: (703-433-4401). Let us know how it goes.

]]>
Consumerist-275178 Thu, 05 Jul 2007 10:59:08 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=275178&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Cingular: Roam Too Much And We'll Take It Away Or Drop You Completely ]]> It's the Return of the One-Way Contract! Reader Randy writes in to inform us that he is being dropped from Cingular, despite being an 8 year customer who always pays on time. Why, you ask? Because Cingular drops less profitable customers, i.e. customers who roam "too much." Randy writes:

I am in the construction business and this past year kept me approximately 3 hours from my home base building a new gymnasium for a school district in a rural part of Texas. Evidently this is in an "out-of-area" part of the state for my cell phone carrier: Cingular. In November 2006 I received a letter from Cingular informing me that they would be dropping me from their service for excessive "out-of-area" usage.
More inside.
I called Cingular and of course got one of their "boiler rooms" where the Cingular employee roboticly informed me that my contract required that a minimum of 50% of my airtime must be "in-area", meaning not in an area that requires "roaming" to kick in (I have since learned that this is pretty much the case with all cellular providers). She said in areas where roaming is required and Cingular has no service in that area that Cingular has reciprocal agreements with other cell phone providers and that Cingular must pay the roaming charges (again I have learned that this is the norm in the cellular business). She informed me of my contract obligations and said it was Cingular's policy to drop someones service when this happens. I informed her that I had no way of knowing whether or not my service was "in-area" or "out-of-area" when I was using my phone and asked her if my phone would indicate as such and of course the answer is no, the phone does not let me know that. So, how do I know when I am "out-of-area"? She said I should get on the Internet and check their coverage map. Yeah, right, I'm going to do that driving down the Interstate at 70 mph as I criscross the state of Texas calling on school districts!
Even though Randy didn't want to leave Cingular, they really didn't want to keep him. Randy appealed their decision and was disappointed by the result.
I did that and when I called regarding the appeal they acknowledged that I was again using my phone "in-area" and that I could probably stay with them.......except: my usage would be restricted to "home area" only. In other words, when I left my home area I would have no service - even if I was willing to pay roaming charges! Well, that won't work. I travel all over this state building school projects. My cell phone is an extremely valuable tool for me.
Randy is off to sign with Verizon. We hope the roaming is greener on the other side.—MEGHANN MARCO

Randy writes:

After eight years as a loyal, on-time bill paying customer, Cingular decided to drop me like a hot potato!

I am in the construction business and this past year kept me approximately 3 hours from my home base building a new gymnasium for a school district in a rural part of Texas. Evidently this is in an "out-of-area" part of the state for my cell phone carrier: Cingular. In November 2006 I received a letter from Cingular informing me that they would be dropping me from their service for excessive "out-of-area" usage.

I called Cingular and of course got one of their "boiler rooms" where the Cingular employee roboticly informed me that my contract required that a minimum of 50% of my airtime must be "in-area", meaning not in an area that requires "roaming" to kick in (I have since learned that this is pretty much the case with all cellular providers). She said in areas where roaming is required and Cingular has no service in that area that Cingular has reciprocal agreements with other cell phone providers and that Cingular must pay the roaming charges (again I have learned that this is the norm in the cellular business). She informed me of my contract obligations and said it was Cingular's policy to drop someones service when this happens. I informed her that I had no way of knowing whether or not my service was "in-area" or "out-of-area" when I was using my phone and asked her if my phone would indicate as such and of course the answer is no, the phone does not let me know that. So, how do I know when I am "out-of-area"? She said I should get on the Internet and check their coverage map. Yeah, right, I'm going to do that driving down the Interstate at 70 mph as I criscross the state of Texas calling on school districts!

So, after pleading my case to her and reiterating the fact that I am a long time customer and not a bill-skipping deadbeat (she acknowledged that she could see on her computer screen how long I had been a customer and that I had an excellant pay history with the company) she held her ground and said that my service would be terminated.

One thing I learned a long time ago is that when dealing with this type of situation you always want to start at the bottom when dealing with company personnel. If you got straight to the top and immediately ask for a supervisor then you have no place else to go "up the ladder" if you don't get the answer you like when you started.

I figured I'd gone as far as I could with the first Cingular employee so I asked for her supervisor. Got her, got the same "company policy" song and dance and still no satisfaction. So, up, up, and away to the next supervisor. This ended up being my last stop. Got the same policy info from her, but, she added that there is an appeal process that I might want to try. She said for me to use my phone as frequently as possible for the next several weeks (before the actual cut-off date) and then call back and ask to appeal Cingular's decision. The thought process here being that they could check the record and see that I was again using my phone primarily in my "home area".

I did that and when I called regarding the appeal they acknowledged that I was again using my phone "in-area" and that I could probably stay with them.......except: my usage would be restricted to "home area" only. In other words, when I left my home area I would have no service - even if I was willing to pay roaming charges! Well, that won't work. I travel all over this state building school projects. My cell phone is an extremely valuable tool for me.

So, the moral here is, when you are a customer of a large corporation like Cingular don't believe for one minute that you, the customer, matter. As far as I'm concerned, in their eyes, I was no different than the deadbeat customers they have - and a large corporation like that has plenty of them, too!

Next step........hello Verizon! We'll see how long they want to keep me!
]]>
Consumerist-230038 Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:09:02 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=230038&view=rss&microfeed=true