<![CDATA[Consumerist: iPod]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: iPod]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/ipod http://consumerist.com/tag/ipod <![CDATA[ Man Loses All His iTunes, But Apple Gives Them Back ]]> When Nathan switched computers he lost all the music he bought off iTunes, but he got it back by e-mailing Apple's iTunes support at iTunesStoreSupport@apple.com.

This is the message he received in reply:

I understand the titles you purchased from the iTunes Store with account [redacted] were lost. I know how upsetting that can be. My name is Jesse and I would be more than happy to help you with this today.

Seeing that you have been a loyal customer since September, 2004, the iTunes Store would like to give you the opportunity to redownload (at no charge) all the titles you purchased on this account that are still available. This does not include any item that has been modified or removed from the store since you purchased it. Please note that you may download your purchases only once, so this is an exception. Also note that Apple does not offer protection for the loss of data from your hard disk, so I recommend that you back up your iTunes library as soon as possible and thereafter on a regular basis. I'll include backup instructions in this email.

Custom ringtones that you made and purchased using iTunes on your computer cannot be replaced because they are created and stored only on your computer's hard disk. Ringtones you purchased on your iPhone will be made available for you to download again as long as they are still available for sale on the iTunes Store and have not been modified.

Any movies you may have rented will not be made available for you to download again. If you rented a movie and were unable to finish watching it, please reply to let me know.

Follow these steps to download the available items:

1) Make sure you're using the latest version of iTunes. It can be downloaded free of charge from the iTunes website:

http://www.itunes.com/download

2) Open iTunes.

3) From the Store menu at the top, choose "Check for Available Downloads". If you're unable to upgrade and are using iTunes 7, the option will say "Check for Purchases".

4) Enter your account name and password, then click Check. Your purchases should begin downloading. If you receive an error message while downloading, try again after turning off any firewall or web-accelerator software that you may have installed.

If you want to pause your downloads and resume later, click Downloads on the left side of iTunes, then click the Pause All button in the lower right corner. When you're ready to resume downloading, just choose "Check for Available Downloads" from the pull-down Store menu at the top, enter your account name and password, then click the Check button.

I do need to mention that I was unable to restore every item in your purchase history. When an item is modified in the iTunes Store, or removed entirely, we no longer have access to the original one that you ordered. This is what I couldn't restore: [redacted]

Fortunately, if you have an iPod or iPhone and have your purchases on it, you can transfer items back to your computer using iTunes. You'll find instructions in this article:

Copying iTunes Store purchases from your iPod or iPhone to a computer
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1848

As soon as your download is finished, it would be a perfect time to do a backup of your entire iTunes to make sure you never lose your purchases. This is something I make sure to tell all my friends to do. Here are some great articles that I use all the time to back up my own iTunes library and playlist.

Instructions for backing up your entire iTunes Library

Instructions for making regular, incremental backups

Instructions for backing up your playlists

Back up your iTunes library by copying to an external hard drive

Backing up your iTunes library to CD or DVD

Thanks to Nathan's work, you can get lazy and not follow the back-up instructions. If you lose all your music, you can just cut and paste this link and sent it to customer service, begging for the same treatment.

(Photo: decaf)

]]>
Consumerist-5395047 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:00:06 EST Phil Villarreal http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5395047&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Marine Declares War On iPod, Which Lives To Tell The Tale ]]> If you thought it was impressive that an iPod could survive a nine-story fall into the Pittsburgh G20 riots, just wait until you hear about the perils that befell an iPod belonging to Aaron, a Marine deployed in Afghanistan.

He writes:

Mid-August, I asked my girlfriend to use my account to buy an iPod classic of the 120GB variety. I finally received it here in Afghanistan at the end of September. Well I'm not the most graceful Marine out there. A week after getting my iPod, I dropped it in front of an oncoming Humvee. Consequently, it was run over, yet it still worked perfectly. I gave much of the credit to the soft sand compressing rapid and the speed of the Humvee as to why my iPod wasn't completely obliterated. Either way, I was happy enough to still have a functioning iPod. In case you didn't know, the curb weight of an up-armored Humvee is about 7,300 lbs.

Two days later, I was sitting inside of a Humvee with the iPod in my lap and a single bud in my ear, without music playing. I tried to close the door but something was stopping it from closing it. I chalked it up to it being a dirty locking mechanism from all the sand. So I attempted to slam the door shut a second time. It still wouldn't close. I look down to make sure the door wasn't being blocked by anything. Lo and behold, my iPod was sitting between the door and the frame. I slammed my iPod in the 500 lbs. door not once, but twice. Although my screen was shattered into oblivion, my iPod still works. I can still listen to music to my heart's content.

I have to send my Kudos out to Apple on the sturdy design of these iPods. I sure portable media devices aren't normally manufactured to withstand this kind of abuse.

The iPod is now officially war zone tested, and have proven tough enough to be issued as standard issue equipment for our soldiers overseas.

(Photo: Jeremy_Schultz)

]]>
Consumerist-5381316 Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:00:02 EDT Phil Villarreal http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5381316&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ iPod Survives Nine-Storey Plunge Into G20 Riots ]]> While leaning out her dorm window to watch some riots — hell, what else is there to do in Pittsburgh? — Bob's daughter's iPod decided it'd had enough of this world and took a swan dive into oblivion.

But sure enough, when she scurried down to the pavement to retrieve the device, it was still playing that newfangled rock-and-roll music the kids are listening to these days. Bob writes:

Had to share this story with you: my daughter attends the University of Pittsburgh and lives on a 9th floor dorm. During the recent G-20 riots in Pittsburgh, she was looking out the window to see what was going on. She accidently dropped her iPod Classic out the open window and it fell 9 floors, landing on the asphalt below. Fearing the worse, she immediately went downstairs and was amazed that — even though the corner of the device was dented — the unit turned on and has worked flawlessly ever since!

Thanks Apple!

It's a stunning story because electronic devices rarely survive the fall from my hip pocket to the floor, let alone from a high-rise into a demonstration.

But even more amazing than the whole iPod-surviving-the-plunge aspect of Bob's daughter's iPod was that it was a rare call from a college student to a parent in which the topic was NOT "Send me more money."

(Photos: tristam sparks, reddevil1)

]]>
Consumerist-5380412 Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:20:17 EDT Phil Villarreal http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5380412&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Microsoft Seeks Arrogant Would-Be Hipsters To Staff New Stores ]]> When Apple needs to come up with a hot new product, it turns to CEO Steve Jobs, who is said to micromanage everything from the color of the product's box to how overpriced it should be. And, when Microsoft needs to go after the next big thing, the company turns to ... Steve Jobs. At least that seems to be the idea behind Microsoft's latest plan, which involves poaching managers from Apple's retail stores.

According to recent reports, Microsoft is actively trying to convince Apple Store managers to come over to the dark side, offering them raises, moving expenses and other perks. After joining up, the new 'softies are expected to assimilate as many of their former colleagues as possible. According to Apple-watcher Jim Dalrymple:

Once hired, the ex-Apple employees are then contacting some of the top sales people in the Apple retail organization offering them positions at Microsoft retail. They have also been offered more money than what they made at Apple.

We still don't quite understand why Microsoft's getting into the retail game at all; the company seems to sell more than enough Xboxes, software and Zunes without the added costs of setting up shop in every mall in America. OK, maybe not Zunes, but the retail presence won't really make a whole lot of difference there.

Poaching from the competition is a time-honored tradition in just about every industry, so it's hard to fault Microsoft for going after the Apple corps. But PC World's David Coursey has a point when he says that, "if the Mac, iPod, and iPhone are really a lifestyle and not mere gizmos, then the true believers will stay. And Apple has many more of the truly faithful than East Germany had."

Then again, Microsoft can tempt them with "a few extra thousand dollars a year, maybe a polo to replace the Apple t-shirt, and the opportunity to work at a company with a better career path than Apple might offer." And don't forget those Zunes. Microsoft has to do something with all of the unsold inventory.

Microsoft poaching Apple store managers and sales staff [The Loop]
If Microsoft Poaches Apple Store Workers, Good Riddance [PC World]

(Photo: Torley)

]]>
Consumerist-5365364 Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:22:33 EDT Marc Perton http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5365364&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apple Store Is Efficient And User-Friendly For Thieves ]]> I've always found Apple Stores to be open and inviting. A team of thieves in New Jersey evidently agree with me. They smashed the front window of the Promenade at Sagemore store in Marlton, N.J. and cleaned out the display models. How long did it take them to steal 23 Macbook Pros, 14 iPhones, and 9 iPod Touches? Thirty-one seconds. Yes, there's surveillance video.

The story had a security guard on duty after a previous robbery, but the thieves claimed to be armed. We certainly wish them luck trying to get a SIM installed in those demo iPhones, though.

Jersey Thugs Clear Apple Store in Seconds [PC World]
Smash and grab theft at Apple Store [ABC 6]
Thieves Clean Out an Apple Store in 31 Seconds [YouTube]

]]>
Consumerist-5351569 Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:51:06 EDT Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5351569&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ iPod Shuffle And Your Sweat Don't Mix ]]> Reader Michael writes to let us know that the latest iPod shuffle, an mp3 player whose small size makes it an attractive exercise companion, tends to break when used as an exercise companion.

Michael writes:

I bought the latest iPod Shuffle from an Apple Store two days ago to use while I run. 15 minutes into my first run with it the Shuffle completely stopped working. I took it to the store and a courteous salesman used a scope, similar to ones used by doctors to check your ears, to look inside the earphone jack to see if there was water damage. Sure enough the white dot at the bottom had turned pink like an awful pregnancy test. I was told there's nothing to be done about water damage no return, no exchange. He suggested putting the device in the sun for a few hours. I asked if he had heard of any problems with the new Shuffle and he said he hadn't. I then went home and looked at Amazon.com and there are 54 one star reviews for the device most of which complain about how the thing gets damaged and breaks due to moisture from sweat many times very soon after purchase. There's also a substantial thread about this on Apple.com's forum. Like most people I bought the shuffle to clip to my shorts to have a small mp3 player not weigh me down. Too bad the thing can't handle sweat. I wonder if the designers for the Shuffle every exercise outside the test lab.

Sure enough, the Amazon page is rife with complaints about iPod Shuffles breaking during workouts because of sweat. We understand that electronics and moisture usually don't go together, but for a company that is known for its design savvy, Apple probably should have reconciled the Shuffle's moisture sensitivity with its obvious appeal to people who want to listen to music while exercising.

(Photo: dooleymtv)

]]>
Consumerist-5329152 Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:00:01 EDT Alex Chasick http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5329152&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Here's another free game for iPhone/iPod ... ]]> free pinball game for iPhoneHere's another free game for iPhone/iPod Touch owners to pass the time this weekend: Wild West Pinball. If you're a Blackberry owner, Bplay has a 30% off sale going on right now—enter JULY in the code box at checkout. [IntoMobile]

]]>
Consumerist-5306955 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:10:12 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5306955&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Recycle Old CDs Into An iPhone or iPod Dock ]]> Do you have a dozen or so unusable CDs or DVDs lying around, some glue and tools, and a burning need for a cool-looking iPod or iPhone dock? Geeky Gadgets can show you how to combine all of these things into a functional, and fashionably recycled, gadget.

DIY: Recycled CD iPhone Dock [Geeky Gadgets] (via Lifehacker)

]]>
Consumerist-5291541 Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:48:47 EDT Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5291541&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Reach Real Customer Service Faster With GetHuman's iPhone App ]]> Gethuman, the awesome website that lists shortcuts to help find your way past automated menu trees and reach live people, now has a free standalone version for iPhone and iPod Touch owners. [gethuman]

]]>
Consumerist-5280745 Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:45:21 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5280745&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ After Taking Whipping From iPod, Redesigned Zune Will Battle iPod Touch ]]> Microsoft's Zune is like Rocky in his fight with Ivan Drago. After getting the crap thoroughly beaten out of it in front of the entire civilized world, the Zune just keeps stepping back into the ring for more punishment.

On Tuesday Microsoft announced its new Zune HD, which plays movies, music and games, joining the iPod Touch, PSP and DSi as do-almost-everything devices that still leave you with iPhone envy because it won't place calls or hook up online without a WiFi signal.

What gives the new Zune a fighting chance is its integration with Xbox Live, the brilliant online gaming/social networking service on the Xbox 360. Variety's Chris Morris is impressed with the idea behind the redesigned device, which is slated for release later this year.

"Many of our Zune customers are Xbox Live Subscribers," said Brian Seitz, a spokesperson for Microsoft's Zune division. "For Xbox Live subscribers that aren't Zune owners, we're hoping they'll be impressed with the video offerings they see ... and give us a second look when they're looking for a new device."

Look at some of the Zune HD's new features and it's pretty obvious that Microsoft realizes their first efforts weren't game changing enough to make a real impact on the portable entertainment marketplace. If it lives up to the hype, the Zune HD could become a much larger player in the field.

Among the new features are:

* Built-in HD Radio receiver
* HD video output capabilities
* OLED touch screen, allowing you to flip through music, movies and other content
* Wi-fi
* Internet browser optimized for multi-touch

Microsoft should be flashing its new baby next week at the E3 convention in Los Angeles, when journalists will go hands-on with the Zune HD and let you know if it has the eye of the tiger.

Zune HD is real - and it's going to shake up Xbox Live [Variety]

]]>
Consumerist-5271133 Wed, 27 May 2009 09:59:44 EDT Phil Villarreal http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5271133&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Woot Wants You To Understand: You <em>Will</em> Get White Headphones ]]> Do you remember Millard? He was the angry customer who demanded that Woot send him black iPod headphones to match his black iPod, and claimed to have been misled by the company. Woot is selling black iPods today and wants to make it very clear—"in case your monitor can't display pictures, or you're black-white colorblind"—you will receive white earbuds with your iPod. Sorry, Millard, Woot is still refusing to cooperate by inventing a black version of the Apple product.

"Apple iPod 30GB Video" [Woot]

]]>
Consumerist-5190382 Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:19:04 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5190382&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Why Apple's New iPod Shuffle Isn't Consumer Friendly ]]> Update: It turns out the special chips used in the headphone controls of the third generation Shuffle don't contain any DRM after all, so any attempts at reverse-engineering won't bring on the wrath of the DMCA.

Despite that, they're still not very consumer friendly. DRM or no, moving the controls off of the actual unit and placing them on an accessory increases the potential* cost. (*Obviously if you use the included ear buds, there's no additional cost.)

This limits any other uses of the Shuffle, for example as a low-cost, portable music player that you'd hook into a home or car stereo. Sure, you can still do that, but you'll have to pay extra money for an Apple-authorized adapter. By using the DRM chip to restrict third-party headphone/adapter companies, Apple has "updated" the Shuffle line in a way that actually reduces its functionality.

They did a similar thing over a year ago, using DRM chips to block any unauthorized video output devices. Unfortunately, this also actually broke the functionality of any earlier third-party video output accessories with newer iPods, forcing the unwary iPod customer who upgraded to a new model to also "upgrade" to a new accessory, or do without.

If you're still thinking of buying a Shuffle, consider looking for an older generation model—the 1st-gen plastic white Shuffles produce the best sound, interestingly, and if you like the idea of controls by your head, note that the built-in clip and incredible lightness of the 2nd-gen Shuffle mean you can clip it on your collar just fine. If you buy this new Shuffle, you're actually buying a device that does less than previous models out of the box, and you'll have to shell out more money to unlock what used to be built-in functionality.

[This post has been edited since it was first published, to reflect new information about the chips used in the Shuffle.]

"iPod headphones aren´t DRMed, just controlled by a proprietary chip that you have to license" [BoingBoing]
"Apple iPod shuffle (Third-Generation)" [iLounge]
"Apple Adds Still More DRM to iPod Shuffle" [EFF]

RELATED
"New iPods, Systems Are Video Compatible" [TWICE]
(Stick 'em up gun: ClarriceCinquetti)

]]>
Consumerist-5170397 Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:27:27 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5170397&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Police Make You Give Your iPod To A Cab Driver As Payment ]]> We're not like, positive or anything, but we doubt there's a law that says you have to give your iPod to a cab driver if your credit card is declined. The New York Post says that a woman was forced, by JFK Airport Police, to hand over her iPod or be "taken downtown."

Natalie Lenhart, of Sacramento, Calif., said the $140 music player, full of "oldies" by The Beatles and James Taylor, was valued at more than $90 more than the final cab fare, with tip, that she racked up last month.

The driver, Mohammed Islam, said he still has the iPod and wants to give it back in the presence of a Taxi and Limousine Commission official.

"What am I going to do with the iPod? There's no ear phones!" said Islam, who has been driving for three years.

Um, ok. Anyway, the police say there's no evidence of any wrong doing on the part of anyone, but they will investigate the incident. The taxi driver says he doesn't want an iPod, he just wants his fare.

How weird.

MUSIC 'FARE' WAS UNFAIR FOR RIDER [NYP]
(Photo:afagen)

]]>
Consumerist-5138029 Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:59:09 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5138029&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Free iPod Engraving" Is Code For "You Can't Return This, Sucker" ]]> Ever wonder why some places will engrave your electronics for free? It's so you can't return them. Really. That's the reason. Returns of perfectly good, non-defective merchandise account for 95% of returns and "free engraving" is a cheap, easy way to ensure that that item won't be coming back.

Back in May of this year, Sony told the WSJ that free engraving had recently saved them a million dollars.

So what, you ask? Well, if you're buying the iPod or the laptop or whatever as a gift — you might want to skip the engraving unless you're totally 100% sure that the person wants it. As in, they said to you, "Aunt Awesome and Uncle Kickass, please get me a new iPod with my name on it, pretty please???" Otherwise, you might just be causing problems for your loved one (or their parents) if they try to return or exchange the gift.

If you are currently stuck with a beautifully engraved iPod you don't want, we've heard rumors that you can try to exchange it for a more expensive one. Here's some advice from someone who claims to have done it.

Bottom line: Engraving is a cool thing for people who know they won't have buyer's remorse — but risky for a gift. Beware.

(Thanks, Jennifer!)
(Photo: decaf )

]]>
Consumerist-5105407 Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:29:27 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5105407&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Warner Brothers forgot to include the advertised ... ]]> Warner Brothers forgot to include the advertised iPod-compatible digital file on its Blu-ray copy of "Speed Racer." It's now offering an online trade, where owners of the disc can exchange their PlaysForSure authorization code for an iTunes store redemption code. (When filling out the form, for "Support Request Type" select "Authorization Code and Licenses".) [warnerbros] (Thanks to Sabler!)

]]>
Consumerist-5053633 Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:48:56 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5053633&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Deposit $75,000 With TD Ameritrade And Get A Free iPod! OMG! ]]> We guess there's really no point at which you're "comfortable" enough to not be tempted by a FREE iPOD! OMG! Reader Jonathan forwarded this email from TD Ameritrade in which they tried to entice him to deposit either $75,000 or $50,000 in order to get himself a free iPod Touch.

Jonathan says:

I think if I had this much to deposit, I could just buy my own Touch. Possible signs of trouble ahead?

Oh maybe. Nothing a few iPods can't fix, apparently.

TD Ameritrade Website Crash, Servers Down [Stocks to Go]
Money fund cut may cost TD Ameritrade clients $100 million [MarketWatch]

]]>
Consumerist-5053139 Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:05:07 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5053139&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Guitar Center Corrects Prices On iPods, Gives Refunds Plus $10 Gift Cards ]]> We received an email from Guitar Center's Chief Marketing Officer this afternoon letting us know that the $100 markup on their iPods was a pricing mistake, and that they're automatically refunding the difference to anyone who bought at the wrong price as well as giving them $10 gift cards.

Here's their email:

We fixed the error on iPod pricing on our website this morning. And anyone who bought at the wrong price is going to be refunded without asking, no matter how long ago they purchased. Plus we are sending them a $10 gift card so they can add some tunes to their new iPod.

Thanks to your reader for pointing out the mistake. Apple changed prices and discontinued some models with their latest upgrades, and our system—for a reason we have fixed—didn't reflect that.

Inflated prices are not in our repertoire. Actually, getting gear in musicians' hands at the lowest possible price is what we are all about. We appreciate the fair shake we got from The Consumerist. Keep up the good work. No problem will ever appear on your site that we do anything other than solve

]]>
Consumerist-5049286 Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:02:41 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5049286&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Morning Deals ]]>
  • Apple: Refurbished iPod touches on sale, 8GB for $180, 16GB for $240, 32GB for $320
  • Amazon: Rewards points upgrade for existing Amazon.com Visa holders
  • Apple: Free Select iTunes TV Shows in HD (requires iTunes 8
Highlights From Dealnews
  • Travelocity: United Airlines Sale: Round-trip flights from $108
  • Amazon.com: Amazon.com Men's Watch Deals: Timex, Marc Ecko, more from $40 + free shipping
  • Sears: Seven7 Women's Jeans for $18 + $6 s&h, more
Highlights From Buxr
  • Budget Truck Rental: $50 Gift card when paying w/American Express
  • Reverie: T-Shirt Sale: Buy 1 TEE get 1 free TEE
  • BestBuy: Westinghouse 42" 1080p LCD HDTV and portable DVD Player for $749.99 + shipping
Highlights From Dealhack
  • Drugstore.com: New Customers: Save $5 or $10 off First Order
  • Vann's: Panasonic FZ28 10.2MP Digital Camera $340 Shipped
  • Amazon: Get Savings of up to 75% off Bargain Books

]]>
Consumerist-5048333 Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:05:23 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048333&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Help! IKEA's Delivery Guys Smashed My iPod! ]]> Reader Belinda's iPod and a few accessories were smashed by some delivery guys contracted by IKEA. When she tried to file a claim for the $500 worth of damage they did, she got the runaround until she eventually gave up and wrote to us.

Belinda writes:

In early July my roommates and I visited an IKEA store in Schaumburg, IL. We spent over $1000 on furnishings that day, opting to have much of it shipped to our apartment in a week. On July 13, movers arrived and carried 14 boxes up to our second floor apartment. I arrived on the scene halfway through the delivery process. They carried boxes in and we pointed them either to the living room or my bedroom to set them down. We checked them off as they carried them in the door, not as they set them in the correct room. They hurriedly asked for initials and left. We grabbed lunch and returned an hour later to begin the long assembly process. I asked my friend to put music on in my room. She reappeared with my 60gb iPod Video, completely smashed.

I had purchased an iHome just the day before, and it was sitting on the floor next a lamp I had purchased at IKEA and taken home (rather than having it delivered). The iPod was docked on top of the iHome, and a long heavy box of wood had been dropped on it. It fell onto a wall outlet as well, cracking the casing and completely bending the prongs of the cords plugged into it sideways. I used pliers and fixed the lamp and iHome's electrical plugs, but the iHome was damaged beyond repair. The iPod dock on the top no longer functions at all, and the internal clock is now unable to distinguish between AM and PM, rendering this equipment a 60-dollar paperweight.

I called IKEA that day and presumably filed a case, because I was promised a return call the next day. I received no such call, and on July 15 I sent this message to IKEA through their online feedback form:

My IKEA order was shipped by Encenda on Sunday morning (7/13). I promptly contacted IKEA that day when I found that the movers had dropped a heavy box of wood from my MALM bed frame onto a wall outlet, iPod, and iHome speaker deck, breaking all of them. The outlet is cracked. My landlord assessed that we'd need new plastic casing. The iPod is completely shattered. I bought it for $399. The iHome's top connector the iPod was sitting in no longer functions. The iHome was purchased just the day before for $60. Considering the mass amount of damage done, I need to get in contact with someone who can help me receive some sort of compensation. Surely IKEA has an insurance policy with Ensenda. I called the day of the incident and was promised a return call the next day. I received nothing, so this is my second attempt at getting results. My phone number is [redacted] Thank you.

- Belinda [redacted]

Later that day I received this:

Hello Belinda,

Thank you for taking the time to contact us. We do apologize for any difficulty that you may have experienced.

Please call the Schaumburg store at 847-969-9700, to present a case to management of this matter. If you already have a case please give them the case number.

We do apologize for any inconvenience, and we thank you for your inquiry.

Best Regards, Beldian
IKEA Customer Care Center

I promptly did just that, and after being transferred to enough different people that I had no idea who I was talking to, I finally spoke to someone who could possibly help me. She asked for a detailed account of what happened, which I relayed to her. She repeated it all back to me slowly and typed furiously, leading me to believe she was filing some sort of report on my behalf. Once we finished, she promised I'd be contacted "in a few weeks." I waited three weeks, received no response, and decided it was time to call to check on the status of my complaint. On August 12, I began my foray into IKEA's customer service yet again.

The first call was spent trying to locate my case. I gave my name, address, and phone number in every way shape and form, to no avail. I explained that I'd never been given a case number, but explained the situation in detail to other representatives. I said I didn't know if I was talking to IKEA or Encenda (the moving company), to which she hastily replied, "Oh no, whoever would have sent you to them was wrong. This is an IKEA issue, not the moving company's. They have nothing to do with it."

She put me on hold to 'check on something,' and after waiting 3 or 4 minutes, I heard a dialtone. She'd hung up on me. I called again and explained that I was trying to locate my case and was unaware of whether my property damage case should be taken up with IKEA or the moving company. She assured me that it was the moving company's issue and said she'd put me on hold to get a hold of the moving company. She hung up on me.

I called again and got a man who seemed genuinely concerned with my situation. I explained that I had just called two other times trying to locate a case that obviously did not exist, and insisted on filing a new one and starting fresh. He kept saying we'd "take care of this situation" and that everything would get resolved. I sat on the line with him in silence for about 5 straight minutes before he cut back in, making sure I was still there. When I affirmed this, he asked if he could put me on hold to contact the Schaumburg store (isn't that who I called?!) to which I loudly responded no before he put me on hold anyway a second later. I sat on hold for 45 minutes before I hung up and called the IKEA customer service line the fourth time. This woman checked and found a case that had been filed that evening (presumably by the man before he put me on hold for 45 minutes), and I asked for a phone number to the moving company. She got it for me and gave me a case number (finally!) before hanging up. She'd promised I'd hear something in 24 hours.

Sure enough, this time I got a response. I received a voicemail from a woman in IKEA's claims department informing me that she put a claim in with the delivery company because "they really don't have anything to do with property claims." I crossed my fingers and hoped that I'd hear from the movers, seeing as IKEA was the middleman in this situation and they hadn't done so well in getting my message across. Amazingly, I received a voicemail from a woman representing what I assume is the moving company. Cindy [redacted] from Veteran's Messenger service claim department... "just to follow up on this after investigating and pulling paperwork, there was no documentation on any paperwork that any items were damaged during this delivery, therefore we are denying the claim. If you have any questions, feel free to contact IKEA."

So I'm not supposed to contact the movers, I'm supposed to contact IKEA. Again. I promptly called her back and asked who exactly I should be talking to in order to receive compensation for the $500-worth of damage done to my personal belongings. She said there was something missing in the documentation, therefore the movers were entitled to deny any wrongdoing.

I opted to not contact IKEA. Long story short, movers dropped a heavy box on my electronics, obviously breaking them, then picked up the box and scurried out without mention of damage. I called IKEA that day to file a claim, was ignored, called 5 more times before finally getting a real case filed, was told that IKEA isn't responsible, was sent to the moving company's claims department, then was denied any wrongdoing by the moving company because IKEA hadn't filed some sort of paperwork.

This is just blatant passing of the blame back and forth, not to mention a slew of customer service representatives who seemed to be confused. Half of them assured me it was the moving company's fault, half of them assured me it was an IKEA issue completely. Now I have an apartment completely furnished by IKEA that I wish I never would have purchased. The furniture itself was a little under a thousand dollars, but adding in delivery charges and the damage, I spent around $1600 on this stuff. Pay close attention to your deliveries. It's been a few months and I've spent hours on the phone, but now understand I'll never be compensated for this disaster delivery. I have every piece of paper & receipt along with my shattered iPod and outlet casing prominently displayed so that I never forget the price of all this furniture. It's also served as a great segue into a heated explanation of my hatred for IKEA whenever a passer-by asks what happened.

We think that since you have a business relationship with IKEA and IKEA only, you should deal with them. Now, obviously that hasn't worked too well, but we recommend taking the following steps.

Write a very concise EECB (Executive Email Carpet Bomb) detailing the chain of events that you describe here. For more information about launching an EECB, click here. You need to reach someone at IKEA who actually knows what to do in this situation, and is able to file accurate paperwork.

If that doesn't work, and it may not, consider filing a small claims lawsuit against IKEA. It's easy and inexpensive, and it will make you feel better about your furniture if you win. Also, IKEA might not even show up, and you may get a default judgment.

Here are some email addresses to try, and some information about small claims court. Good luck.

]]>
Consumerist-5045582 Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:58:41 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5045582&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Morning Deals ]]>
  • Newegg: Wii Fit with Balance Board, We Ski, and Hori Wii mat for $149.99
  • Apple: Buy a Mac, get an iPod touch for free after rebate
  • IKEA: Labor Day Sale, up to 50% off (in-store only)
Highlights From Dealhack
  • Eastern Mountain Sports: Labor Day Sale Save up to 70% off
  • Amazon: Up to 50%+ off High Sierra Backpacks & Messenger Bags
  • Geeks: Kodak EasyShare V1003 10MP Digital Camera $90
Highlights From Bargainist

]]>
Consumerist-5042868 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:28:51 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5042868&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Morning Deals ]]>
  • Woot: Soundcast Audiocast Wireless Audio System for $49.99
  • American Signature Furniture: Urban Living Queen Panel Bed for $299
  • Dell: Flip Video 30 Minute Camcorder for $49.99 Shipped after rebate
  • Highlights From Dealhack
    • Vann's: Klipsch iGroove HG iPod Speakers $100 Shipped
    • Mac Connection: Apple iMac $1099 + Free VMWare Fusion Software
    • Chefs: Labor Day Sale: Save up to 80% off Cookware, Kitchen Tools, & More
    Highlights From Bargainist
    • Southwest: Fares starting at $59 one-way
    • Purina: Free bag of Purina Yesterday's News cat litter
    • Arizona Jeans: 50% off select jeans and all shoes
    ]]>
    Consumerist-5042376 Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:07:14 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5042376&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ iPod Nano Explodes While Charging ]]> Reader D's first-gen iPod Nano was chugging power from his PC's USB port when suddenly he saw it "explode open and start shooting sparks and spewing smoke." Pictures inside, along with Apple's response.

    Dale sent us his lengthy missive to Steve Jobs:

    I am writing this in regards to an issue I have had with an iPod nano, first generation. I have included the relevant pictures of my iPod after this incident and links to related issues.

    I had plugged the iPod in to charge on Saturday August 16, 2008. I was using the USB cable that came with the iPod and charging via the USB port on my PC. After being plugged in for somewhere between 5-10 minutes I heard a sizzling sound. I looked down on the iPod just in time to see it explode open and start shooting sparks and spewing smoke. I managed to unhook the iPod from my computer's USB port immediately. I had noticed that a small fire had started on the table I had the laptop and the iPod sitting on, and I managed to extinguish those flames quickly before any apparent damage could be done to my laptop. Unlike in other cases, I've read about, my iPod continued to spew smoke and spit sparks while throwing out some kind of sooty substance from the inside of the iPod for several minutes after removing the cable from the computer. I moved the still spitting iPod from the table and placed it on a book case across the room. I noticed that while doing this, the iPod was still extraordinarily hot to the touch.

    I immediately called up the apple tech support line while I opened a window to clear the smoke out of my apartment. After weeding through their electronic menu, I was put on hold for around 15 minutes. This gave me some time to calm down, and after telling the representative that my iPod nano exploded, I was transferred directly to the customer support supervisor at the time. His extension is X86702. He walked me through a 20 minute survey regarding the issue before putting me on hold again to contact the "engineers". After this, he informed me that he did not get through, but would hear back from them that evening for certain. I was also informed that Apple would replace my iPod regardless at this point even though it's older. I have to take a few moments to commend him as he seemed to genuinely want to help me. I had asked what I could do to get a replacement iPod ASAP. I was told to go to the nearest apple store and they should be able to replace it. I also asked if it was ok to make an appointment for that evening, and I was told it would be fine as we should have heard back from the "engineers" by then.

    After waiting several hours and not hearing back from the supervisor, I attempted to contact him at the extension and number I was given. This was transferred directly to his voicemail and I did not hear back from him that night. I had then traveled to the local apple store in Pittsburgh, PA to see what could be done about the iPod. Here I was told that "it's been submitted as a request to the 'engineers' and can't be handled". The support tech at the Genius Bar seemed genuinely concerned and opened a separate case file to see if he could do anything to help me out. He found out that all he could do was submit it to the engineers who would NOT be in until monday. At this point, I became overly frustrated that the original tech had led me to believe this issue could have been sorted out that day. Also I do not think I'm being unreasonable by asking a company to replace the iPod with a different iPod product, as I could easily have been hurt or injured by the one that had malfunctioned!

    I had asked the tech if there's any way he can replace it as the guy on the phone had told me that the local store could swap it out. He then went into the office to confer with the manager and the GM via phone. He returned to tell me that they can NOT exchange the iPod, and can only escalate the claim to the "engineers". At which point, I became upset that, once again, the original tech was wrong that this could be handled on-site at the local apple store. I once again asked if they could do anything as I'm overly frustrated with the service I'm receiving; I was told that the iPod would be replaced regardless. At this point, the tech went back to the office to confer once again with the manager.

    The manager comes out with the tech shortly after and explains to me that no one at apple has EVER heard of this happening (although, I have found articles that counter this), and that she did not believe there was anything that she could do. She asked me to "do her a favor" and wait until monday night (EST) to handle this matter. I informed her that I understand that she's stuck in a hard situation, but I was promised by someone in the support that this could be handled at a local store, and that the iPod would be replaced. She walks back into the back room, and shortly returns with a phone number. She calls up the GM and puts him on the phone with me. At this point, I want to commend the in-store staff as they seemed concerned about this issue and really wanted to make it right. I really do not wish to paint the store employees in a bad way as they had really tried to help me. The GM is, of course, another issue.

    The GM gets on the phone and tells me who he is and he's sorry to hear this. He goes on to inform me that they CAN NOT and WILL NOT give me another iPod. He mentions that this has to go to the engineers first before he will even CONSIDER dealing with the issue. I mention that I have read the reports of this happening before, and that there are numerous instances. He scoffs at this and implies that this is a completely unusual occurrence and no one he knows of has heard of it.

    I mention to him that the guy at tech support had told me this can be replaced at the local store. Once again, he says that NOTHING will be done until the engineers look at the iPod, and until he talks with them on monday. I ask why that is, and he says "to make sure there are no safety issues or concerns." I asked what were the issues regarding the safety, to which he replied "there are numerous things that could probably cause this". I asked him to name a few, and was met with "the list is too long to mention." I found this odd, as he had told me before he had never heard of this issue, yet could think of a long list of things that could cause an iPod to explode and catch fire.

    I continued to ask what the safety issue would be if he just replaced the iPod. To which he said "it could be the cables". I told him that the tech support on the phone informed me that i should not use those cables, and that they would be replaced when the iPod is. The GM informs me that they DO NOT replace cables. I continued to say, but, if he was to replace the iPod and the cables, that it would eliminate any safety risk. He assured me that was not the case. I then informed him that it sounds like he was accusing me of intentionally doing this to my iPod. He claimed he wasn't, but I pointed out that if you replace any and all apple hardware involved, there's no safety issue, UNLESS the issue is with my existing hardware that's not apple. he informed me that that was not the case. I informed him that if this was due to a defective iPod, replacing the iPod eliminates the safety issue. He told me that it might not be that case. To which I asked, what exactly safety issue there was if the fault was NOT with apple software. He repeated that they need to look over the iPod to determine any safety issues before even considering replacing the iPod. I became very frustrated at this point that he was trying to use double speak in order to make excuses and push the blame onto me.

    At this point I offered to leave the faulty iPod with the apple store to send off to the engineers as needed, but that I wanted my iPod replaced as I was promised by the tech on the phone. The GM informs me that the tech was in no way, shape, or form allowed to make that guarantee to me. At this point, and I am ashamed to say, I lost my temper with the GM. I told him that I was not pleased at all with this service since I was promised that the iPod would be replaced, and yet it was not going to be. The GM informed me that he wasn't even sure if it NEEDED to be replaced let alone if apple WOULD replace it. After this turn, my language became peppered with profanity. The GM continued on to tell me that he's not going to do anything about the issue, and that I could sit there all night and tell him how he should handle it, but it is NOT now he will handle it.

    In other words, the GM wanted to take up more of my time in order to try and push the blame on me for the iPod breaking, completely negate anything I was told originally by tech support, and try to get me out of their store as quickly as he could without doing anything to resolve the issue.

    After reading another issue or two, it appears as though apple is now saying that even if it is a faulty piece of equipment and does damage to other objects or people, that it is NOT their responsibility to replace it unless you have a current warranty. I had not picked up the extended warranty due to the fact that, at the time, I had not received word of any issues. Now, I am fully regretting that decision as I'm sure that they would not allow me to take out a warranty now to cover the issue. This upsets me as they have made a precedent to replace products, even out of warranty, if the issue is due to a severe product malfunction such as this.

    After this, I can fully say that I am not pleased at all with how this issue has been handled by apple. I have been informed of an email address within the Apple company, and I plan on sending a copy of this email, along with the pictures to that address also. From the various stories I have read, of which I have included links, it has been made clear that this is NOT an isolated incident as Apple would have me believe. I do not feel that Apple has been doing a sufficient job of resolving this matter in any way, shape, or form. Based on the other reports, I do not have much hope that this matter will be resolved in any timely fashion, that my iPod will be replaced, that I will be compensated for anything, that I will get an apology for their tech support making claims that they were not permitted to, or for the store obviously not being on the same page as tech support. Frankly, in my search for information regarding the iPod, I've found other reports that claim this type of fault for other issues. This ranges from problems with computers, to mp3 players, and even to censoring comments and forum posts regarding bugs with their products. By bringing this up, I hope to make it known that these type of issues appear to be common with apple. Like other manufacturers, they sometimes produce faulty products, however, they seem to want to protect their corporate image and pockets more than make up for their faulty product. In this case, it was a known issue with this model of iPod and the company did not seem to make any motions to address the issue. I hope that by making this public, people may be able to avoid this issue happening with their own electronics, and that they may be prepared for what they would have to deal with in the process of attempting to resolve the issue. While Apple may produce numerous ad campaigns that make them seem almost invincible, their products are like any others: buyer beware.

    The fiery Nano:

    Dale's burnt desk:

    The pictures look awfully similar to other iPods that have spontaneously combusted.

    This iPod exploded yesterday and we don't see the harm in giving Apple a day to sort out what went wrong. Still, we're not sure how the engineers can do much without the physical unit, and it would seem wise for the Apple store to have an unspoken policy of 'Return Exploded iPod, Get 1 Free!'

    Update: Apple agreed to replace the iPod.

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5038095 Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:15:52 EDT Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5038095&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Apple: We Don't Have A Battery For Your 30GB iPod, So Take This 80GB iPod For Free Instead ]]> Apple couldn't repair Adrienne's 30GB iPod before she planned to leave for a cross-country trip, so they decided to give her a brand new 80GB iPod. And since it was a new iPod, they also waived the $70 repair fee.

    She writes:

    I show up on Friday, surrounded by people with iPhone issues (dude, I’d totally be on that bandwagon if they hadn’t contracted with AT&T, but that’s another story). My personal Genius said yep, you need a new battery and OF COURSE they were completely out of stock. I state, somewhat irately (the first Genius wasn’t really that nice and blamed me for not checking on the stock on Wednesday), that it needed to be done, please call the King of Prussia store - anywhere from here to Delaware - and get me the part and an appointment. He stated that he didn’t have time to help me and grabbed the man who eventually become my Apple Store savior - Dan in the black shirt.

    Thank god for black shirt Dan. After hearing my sob story about the stresses of moving across the country (I know - I’m moving to freaking paradise, finally going to grad school, and getting a dog… my life is soooooo tough), he called KOP (who OF COURSE also didn’t have the part). Sensing that I had completely given up hope (literally, head down on my Fat City Reprise purse, completely dejected, and wondering how many times I’d hear Miley Cyrus on shuffle all on my Nano), Dan vowed to figure something out. I expected, I guess, that maybe they would forward my info to the Apple Store in Boulder and hook me up or maybe let me purchase a replacement 30GB (since they no longer sell them) for the price of the repair.

    I was offered neither of those options. I saw the Holy Grail of ridiculously amazing customer service.

    Since there were no 30GB iPods in stock (OF COURSE!!!), I was going to be given a brand spanking new 80GB iPod for the price of the repair. Holy shit. Insane - I don’t even have enough music to fill that. I looked at Dan and tried to not cry, which freaked him out I think, because he got that “Oh Christ, please don’t freak out” look on his face. I assured him that I was thrilled, just because shit like this doesn’t ever happen to me and I had been super-stressed out. He then made it better by telling me that it would be easier if they charged me nothing. NOTHING.

    Because Apple cares about their customers, I got an 80GB iPod for free.

    Great work, Apple!

    Steve Jobs Knows Customer Service [Randomn3ss]
    (Photo: Getty)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5035183 Sat, 09 Aug 2008 21:00:33 EDT Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5035183&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Why Do iPod Headphones Cost $49.99 At Best Buy and $29.99 At The Apple Store? ]]> Reader Nick doesn't want you to pay too much for Apple iPod headphones, so he's asked us to let you know that Best Buy is charging $49.99 for basic white iPod earbuds and they're only $29.99 at the Apple Store. Let it be known that Best Buy is not the best place to buy accessories.

    I was at my local Best Buy the other day and started to take a look around the Apple section. Well, it turns out that Best Buy is trying to take advantage of their uninformed customers by marking up Apple's iPod headphones by $20! I've included two attachments, the first is the picture I took at the Best Buy store and the second is of the same exact headphones on Apple's website. I hope that you can shed some light on this and hopefully save some shoppers from paying too much.

    Thanks, Nick. We recommend that you always check the internet before you buy accessories for your electronics — this includes things like cables, headsets, universal remotes, whatever!

    Where do you like to buy your accessories? Tell us in the comments.

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5026256 Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:44:33 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5026256&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Costco Sells You A 60GB iPod In A 160GB Box, Apologizes, Gives Refund ]]> Reader Sean writes:

    This is a copy of a letter that I just sent to Costco, I X'd out the serial numbers


    This letter is in reference to my purchase of a 160GB Ipod Classic from the Brick, NJ Costco (store #229) on March 29th. While the packaging and box indicate a 160GB device, I discovered that the box actually contained a 60GB Ipod. I seek a full refund on my purchase and an apology from the store's general manager, Leonard for my treatment.

    Only one hour after purchasing the Ipod, I opened the box in my apartment in the presence of my girlfriend. To be certain that the capacity of the device was in fact only 60GB, I downloaded Itunes and plugged the Ipod into my computer. Itunes confirmed the device's capacity was only 60GB. Upon discovering the error, I immediately went back to the store and explained my dilemma. The issue was quickly escalated to Leonard, the store's general manager. Before I could even begin to explain what happened, Leonard told me in a stern and knowing voice that "this Ipod did not come from this box". He accused me of going home, switching the Ipod with one that I had previously owned, and was attempting to con Costco for a better Ipod. I felt as if I was being scolded by a teacher in middle school. I was insulted and humiliated. I've never been accused of committing a crime in my life. After a few minutes of trying to explain the situation to Leonard, it was evident that his mind had been made up before he even began to talk to me, and my efforts to convince him were fruitless. I can't help but think that if my girlfriend or mother were the one returning an Ipod that they bought, they would have been treated differently. I believe the general manager saw a young man and assumed I was trying to pull a fast one. Rather than having my issue addressed, I was embarrassed, accused of committing a crime, and escorted out of the store.

    I know from working in customer service that the customer isn't really always right, and there are plenty of deceitful people out there who would try to pull a scam like this, but I believe that a loyal customer with a perfect track record, who has never returned anything to Costco, deserves the benefit of the doubt in situation like this. I should not be guilty until proven innocent. I am NOT a thief. I am an IT professional and make a decent enough living that I do not have to scam my local Costco to get an upgraded Ipod. Never in my life have I been treated like this at a retail establishment

    From talking with Apple (case # XXX) I've learned that the Ipod that was in my box is a 60GB Video Ipod (the serial # is XXX) that is not in production any more. The serial number on the box that I have (for a 160GB Black Ipod Classic) is XXX. It is also of note that Apple told me that neither of these Ipods has been registered with Itunes, which I believe indicates that neither Ipod has ever been used.

    I honestly have no idea how that particular Ipod got in the box that I opened. It was shrink-wrapped when I opened it and I did not notice any obvious tampering with the box or contents. (the pouch with the earplugs was unopened). I'm not sure if Apple is at fault or if it is the misdeed of some warehouse worker along the way who switched out Ipods and re-shrink-wrapped the package. But I do not believe it is my responsibility to figure that out. I just want what I paid my hard earned money for and an apology from Leonard, the general manager for treating me like a thief instead of a customer. Thanks for your assistance in resolving this matter.

    We were about to advise Sean that he'd have better luck talking with his credit card company and doing a chargeback (based on the many stories we've heard from customers of certain other retailers), but before we could post his letter, Sean wrote back to tell us that Costco had made good and the issue had been resolved.

    Kudos to Costco. These situations usually involve a chargeback or someone calling a local reporter.

    ]]>
    Consumerist-374763 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:27:07 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=374763&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ This is a copy of a letter that I just sent ... ]]> This is a copy of a letter that I just sent to Costco

    This letter is in reference to my purchase of a 160GB Ipod Classic from the Brick, NJ Costco (store #229) on March 29th.  While the packaging and box indicate a 160GB device, I discovered that the box actually contained a 60GB Ipod.  I seek a full refund on my purchase and an apology from the store’s general manager, Leonard for my treatment.

    Only one hour after purchasing the Ipod, I opened the box in my apartment in the presence of my girlfriend.   To be certain that the capacity of the device was in fact only 60GB, I downloaded Itunes and plugged the Ipod into my computer.  Itunes confirmed the device’s capacity was only 60GB.  Upon discovering the error, I immediately went back to the store and explained my dilemma.  The issue was quickly escalated to Leonard, the store’s general manager. Before I could even begin to explain what happened, Leonard told me in a stern and knowing voice that “this Ipod did not come from this box”.  He accused me of going home, switching the Ipod with one that I had previously owned, and was attempting to con Costco for a better Ipod.  I felt as if I was being scolded by a teacher in middle school.  I was insulted and humiliated.  I’ve never been accused of committing a crime in my life.  After a few minutes of trying to explain the situation to Leonard, it was evident that his mind had been made up before he even began to talk to me, and my efforts to convince him were fruitless.  I can’t help but think that if my girlfriend or mother were the one returning an Ipod that they bought, they would have been treated differently.  I believe the general manager saw a young man and assumed I was trying to pull a fast one.  Rather than having my issue addressed, I was embarrassed, accused of committing a crime, and escorted out of the store.  

    I know from working in customer service that the customer isn’t really always right, and there are plenty of deceitful people out there who would try to pull a scam like this, but I believe that a loyal customer with a perfect track record, who has never returned anything to Costco, deserves the benefit of the doubt in situation like this.  I should not be guilty until proven innocent.  I am NOT a thief.  I am an IT professional and make a decent enough living that I do not have to scam my local Costco to get an upgraded Ipod. Never in my life have I been treated like this at a retail establishment

    From talking with Apple (case # XXX) I’ve learned that the Ipod that was in my box is a 60GB Video Ipod (the serial # is XXX) that is not in production any more.  The serial number on the box that I have (for a 160GB Black Ipod Classic) is XXX.  It is also of note that Apple told me that neither of these Ipods has been registered with Itunes, which I believe indicates that neither Ipod has ever been used.   

    I honestly have no idea how that particular Ipod got in the box that I opened.  It was shrink-wrapped when I opened it and I did not notice any obvious tampering with the box or contents. (the pouch with the earplugs was unopened).   I’m not sure if Apple is at fault or if it is the misdeed of some warehouse worker along the way who switched out Ipods and re-shrink-wrapped the package.  But I do not believe it is my responsibility to figure that out.  I just want what I paid my hard earned money for and an apology from Leonard, the general manager for treating me like a thief instead of a customer.  Thanks for your assistance in resolving this matter.

    Here are some pics


    http://img388.imageshack.us/img388/5670/contentswl0.jpg

    http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/4096/contents2dt2.jpg

    http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/1607/ipodaq4.jpg

    http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/5575/wrapzu1.jpg

    -SeanMac23

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5004870 Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:04:02 EDT SeanMac237 http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5004870&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Is It Legal To Use Out Of Date List Prices For Comparison On Sales? ]]> Last week we pointed out how Apple artificially inflates the discount of its refurbished units by using the original introductory list price as a comparison, even if the price has since dropped and the true list price is now lower. Now a reader writes in to say he caught Toys R Us doing the same thing on sale prices of Playstation 3 bundles and 30 gig Zunes. Our question: is this legal? New York City's consumer protection law seems to imply that—at least for retailers doing business in NYC—it's not, unless you clearly indicate the trail of price reductions, something neither company is doing.

    The reader, Gizmo Sprocket (we'll call him GS), noticed the price difference on the PS3 bundle.

    con_ps3saleprice.jpg

    The implication is that Toys R Us is discounting the console further from the list price, but GS knew that the list price is now $499 no matter where you buy the console—hence, this was no discount at all. He decided to ask Toys R Us what was going on:

    There was no option for simple pre-order questions or to report problems with the website.... So I navigate phone-tree hell and finally get somebody on the phone. They insisted that the list price was $599. I explained that the initial launch PS3 bundles were indeed listed at this price, but the item they mentioned was not $599. There was some discussion surrounding that the launch PS3 was an entirely different model and SKU- including a 60gb model (not 80) and didn't include Motorstorm as indicated in this online listing. In fact, this sku was always $499. [see image at left. -Consumerist] con_ps3listprice.jpgThey went to the Sony store online and told me they searched on SonyStyle for "PS3" and again insisted that the list price was $599. I repeated the search on my end of the phone call and saw what they saw.

    They then conceded there was a problem (finally) and said it would be looked into. I asked if they would honor selling me this PS3 for $100 off the list price as Toys R Us Dot Com showed they were selling it (the list price actually being $499 not $599 as listed) and they said they would not.

    Note: Today we visited the Sony link and any mention of a price had been removed. Here is the original page as sent in by GS, taken earlier this week. He continues:
    I am not sure this is illegal or unethical- as a consumer I was prepared to buy it for $399 if they would honor that price. I am still prepared to buy the 80gb motorstorm bundle for $399 if they would honor that price, but that is besides the point.

    So- it is definitely illegal to indicate an inflated list-price in NY State and probably other areas. As I live in NY State and this product would be shipped to NY State. Toys R Us Dot Com markets in NY State and it would seem that this consumer protection applies. This could be an innocent mistake, but part of me thinks it would be reasonable for them to honor their posted discounted price in either proportion ($100 off of $599 is a discount of 16.66667 percent) or as a drop of $100 off off the $499 actual list. Either way I'd buy it..

    What are your thoughts?

    The next day, GS found a similar pricing issue on Toys R Us with a Zune:
    con_zunesaleprice.jpg I check Techbargains.com occasionally. At lunch i noticed a clearance sale over at Toys R Us dot com. I wondered if the list price issue was fixed on the PS3 so I clicked through techbargains and then clicked for items over $100 and found the 30gb Zune listed.. the list price is noted as $249.99 and then, below it- Our price: 199.99... I just checked on http://www.zune.net/en-us/products/compare.htm and found the 30gb is listed at $199.00. The price was dropped when the new Zune models were announced. Now what is really troubling is that this page is supposed to show things on a clearance sale! It says so at the top of the page.con_zunelistprice.jpg
     
    Gizmo Sprocket makes an interesting point from a business liability perspective: if you list an inflated percentage of savings based on an out-of-date list price—which is what Apple does on its refurbished products—and a customer catches it, can he demand you honor that percentage discount on the real list price? If so, that's reason enough to start being completely honest with list prices, "original prices," and reductions.

    As to the legality of it (we're getting there, we just had to get through a lot of backstory first), here's the actual law in New York City:

    Rules of the City of New York -
    Title 6
    Department of Consumer Affairs

    §5-91 Reductions Based on Advertiser's Own Price; "Formerly," "Regularly," "Reduced," "Percent Off," "Save," and Similar Terms.

    (a) Immediately preceding price. If an advertiser uses the words:

              "percent off"
              "formerly .., now ..."
              "reduced"
              "reduced to"
              "regularly..., now ..."
              "now only"
              "save $ ..."
              "was ..., now ...,
              "item now $ ..."

    or any similar term implying a reduction from a prior price charged by the advertiser, the price to which the reduced offering price is being compared must be the advertiser's bona fide selling price for that item or service unless the advertiser clearly discloses another basis of comparison or qualification.

    (b) Intermediate reductions. If the term "originally," or any similar term, is used in any advertisement, the price stated as the "original" price must be the advertiser's bona fide selling price for the same article or service prior to intermediate reductions, and the price immediately prior to the current reduction must be disclosed, unless intermediate reductions are clearly indicated by the language used.

    Example: "Originally $75; then $68; now $65"; "Earlier this year $75; now $65"; "Further reduced to $50."

    (c) Comparison not recent. If a claim is based on a past bona fide selling price of the advertiser prior to the recent, regular course of business, the advertiser must clearly disclose that fact.
    Example: "Last year $40, now $20."

    That seems to be saying that, if you're going to list original prices in order to accentuate the appeal of your discount, you have to show a clear trail of the item's pricing history—sort of like how Filene's Basement or Daffy's lists an original price, a reduced price, and then the current sales price on their tags.

    RELATED
    "You Can't Discount The Past, Apple"
    (Photo: Getty)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-361491 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:23:08 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361491&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Steve Jobs Only Wishes He Could Price Like This ]]> con_sdpproipodnano.jpg Erin writes, "I was searching for an iPod Nano on Google Products and this link came up!" That's one hell of a markup there, anonymous web store with no branding and an empty "Contact Us" page. Our favorite part: "NOT FOR RESALE"—don't even think about buying this and marking it up for your own store.

    (Thanks to Erin!)

    "Blue iPod Nano" [sdppro]

    ]]>
    Consumerist-361311 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:01:36 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361311&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Happy Resolution To Very Strange Circuit City iPod Touch Bait And Switch ]]> goldentouch.jpgCircuit City lied to Ian about giving him a discounted iPod Touch, but now he has a satisfactory resolution. He writes:
    After writing a number of emails to Circuit City and after a making few more (fruitless) calls, I tried something new and posted my story to their public online customer service forums. The forum manager responded very quickly and promised that someone would call me back to resolve things. I received two calls last Thursday from Circuit City staff who wanted to help fix the situation;

    ...unfortunately I was on a plane at the time, and had meetings all weekend that prevented me from calling back. But this morning, I got a third call, this time from a supervisor in the Sales department (the same department which had originally called me). Unlike the customer service people I spoke to last week, the supervisor I spoke to today was incredibly friendly and helpful - after I explained the situation in detail, he apologized, then explained that what happened was NOT how Circuit City usually does business, that I was not the only person who'd experienced trouble last week, and that the issue has now been dealt with. The supervisor then offered to give me an additional discount on the item, which I was happy to accept - and I picked up my new iPod this evening. It's charging and syncing as we speak! It may be time-consuming and rather annoying to have to fight for your rights as a customer, but it's important to do it... and although it took a few days, Circuit City really did step up in the end, acknowledge the problem and make it right. And I'm happy to report that they've kept a customer today.
    Interesting, Ian wasn't the only one who experienced the bait and switch. But by escalating his issue and posting it in their online public customer service forum, he was able to get a very satisfactory solution. Another technique to remember. They might be able to ignore calls and emails, but dirty laundry up in their base is hung for all to see, and so sometimes they try to clean it quickly.

    PREVIOUSLY: Very Strange Circuit City iPod Touch Bait And Switch

    (Photo: Dan_H)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-361119 Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:02:58 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361119&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Very Strange Circuit City iPod Touch Bait And Switch ]]> ipodtouchy.jpgIan writes:
    Last Thursday 2/14, I ordered a 32GB iPod touch from CircuitCity.com at $474 + tax for a total of about $514. After thinking about it for a bit, I logged back in and canceled the order - just a bit too steep for an iPod, you know? I figured I'd have to wait a while for the price to drop, and left it at that. Well, believe it or not, I received a call at work today from a Circuit City sales rep at corporate telling me he'd offer me the iPod at a discount, so CC could keep my business. I was baffled - nothing like this has ever happened to me before, but the price he gave me $420 + tax... was too good to pass up.

    I wondered if this wasn't just a bit fishy, except the man did have all my previous order information... only Circuit City could possibly have that. When the man asked for my CC number, I told him I just don't give it out to random people who called me (hehe), and asked him for a number where I could call him back - he gave me the number, and when I called back, it was very clearly a Circuit City number.

    So I gave the rep my credit card number, and he told me the final charge would be about $469.

    Seconds after I hung up, I realized that $420 plus tax was $455, NOT $469, so I called the number back so the rep could make an adjustment.

    No answer, of course... just voicemail. I tried calling back several times throughout the morning and early afternoon as well, but still... just voicemail.

    I started to get the feeling that something was wrong... so I logged on to the Circuit City site to see my order, ready to be picked up later that day in Midtown Manhattan - and was shocked to see that my card was charged for the amount of $550 - full retail plus tax. $100 more than he had quoted me over the phone!!!

    I kept calm and called customer service, who escalated the problem to corporate. Corporate told me that they had no record of this gentleman offering me a discount, and all they could do was cancel my order.

    There was no one else I could speak to, and due to "policy," they couldn't - read, "wouldn't" honor the price I was given.

    I calmly explained that they might as well cancel all of my FUTURE orders as well. What an outrageous business practice to have a rep call me and offer me one price for an item, only to charge my card nearly $100 more. What a great disappointment, as I had been a customer for many, many years. Still, nothing more than a half-hearted apology and a "we'll look into it."

    I immediately called Amex to cancel my card - clearly, there's some fraudulent activity going on at the City. Just a warning to other potential Circuit City customers out there. If it sounds too good to be true, it most definitely is.

    Buyers beware!

    - Ian

    Very strange. Do stores do this, try to "retain" your online sale if you cancel it? First I've ever heard of it. Maybe the guy needed one last "save" before going home for the night and getting you to redo your order under false pretenses fit the bill.

    (Photo: Vince Brown (attila))

    ]]>
    Consumerist-360128 Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:10:56 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=360128&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Best Buy Employee Unhappy With The Customer Service At The Apple Store ]]> Here's a letter that just goes to show that customer service depends on which employee you get. Reader Cody works at Best Buy (in the Apple department, apparently) and his brother is getting the runaround at the Apple store. Is this the ultimate retail showdown?

    ATTN: Store Manager and/or Assistant Managers

    I never thought I'd ever have to write this email, but I am.

    My brother visited your store on November 17th, and visited a Mac Genius. And I have two issues with this visit.

    1. After making a reservation through the online concierge service for 4:45 pm five hours prior to the scheduled time) he was told he didn't have a reservation and would have to wait to receive support with his malfunctioning iPod Nano.

    2. The genius repeated steps that my brother told him didn't work, and told him to take it home and try again.

    Upon getting home, wha-da-ya-know.. still doesn't work.

    I'm not mad, just kind of irritated. I hold you guys to a higher standard, because you're also capable of higher quality.
    I've been using macs for over a decade, and to hear from my PC brother that Apple wasted his gas driving 12 miles to get there, waiting through holiday shopping Saturday traffic, and his time to see a genius... that disappoints me.

    The irony is we got him the iPod to make his life easier, and it has stressed him out even further.

    Here's What The Problem Was:

    iPod Nano 2nd Generation that continually reboots, gets stuck, reboots, gets stuck, reboots.... until the battery dies. This was an issue that happened right out of the box, but was solved by a Restore; three months later, it started doing it again. After he returned home, I temporarily fixed it by restoring it with my mac, then restoring it with his PC. I loaded 10 songs to test it, and it worked great. Then I loaded the rest of his library, and boom.. back to square one. There is a corruption in the boot sector of his flash memory causing it to have this issue.

    I realize this is a rather complex issue for a Mac Genius, but it doesn't take a Mac Genius Training Course to realize this is something that you don't just "hope for the best".

    The fact that it did it immediately after pulling it out of the box puzzles me, especially when we have done the same steps to fix it we did the first time.

    The iPod is currently in deep sleep, which I was able to turn on by accessing the iPod service menu

    I would love to have more correspondence with you over this issue, and I would prefer you speak to me instead of him.

    I have read the limited warranty twice, and I know that his iPod is eligible for replacement for this hardware/software malfunction.

    I'll quote it..

    "If a hardware defect arises and a valid claim is received by Apple within the Warranty Period, at its option and to the extent permitted by law, Apple will... ...(2) exchange the product with a product that is new..."

    I will be making an appointment to see a Mac Genius on Tuesday November 20th, and I hope we can get this issue resolved once and for all, and I can go back to being a happy apple fan-boy.

    P.S.
    I work at Best Buy in the iPod section, and I've never drawn out a warranty issue with a customer about such an obvious defect with their Apple iPod. In-fact, I've personally made sure that I handled that issue as fast as I could whether it was with a repair that Best Buy did not receive any payment for, or with a full replacement with a new iPod. I'm not paid with commission, I just know that you don't grow a business by shrugging your shoulder and say "try again".

    Honestly I'm not angry, just upset.
    Because you can do better.

    The genius he spoke to was

    [redacted]

    The iPod was restored with iPod Nano 2nd Gen. software 1.1.3 on both:
    a Windows machine running iTunes 7.5.0.20
    a MBP 10.4.11 running iTunes 7.5 (r19)
    See you tuesday.

    Update:
    Before hitting the send button in Mail.app I decided to try one last time...
    Same problem except now it refuses to enter Service Mode or Disk Mode,

    :( This sucks. Cya soon.

    A Very Upset, Yet Extremely Loyal Apple User\Customer\Third-Party Salesman,


    Cody

    He seems to have everything well in hand, so we'll just say: Good luck, Cody!

    (Photo:Maulleigh)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-324874 Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:08:31 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=324874&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ How About Not Buying An iPod? ]]> con_littleboyscreamingatnoi.jpg Okay, we'll say it, and understand that we're writing this post on an old iBook: the iPod line is starting to look tired. Sure, that Touch is elegant in the same way as the iPhone—but its capacity is similar to the Nano, and what if don't want to carry around a Kubrick-style slab of minimalism? There are now some really nice alternatives out there if you're willing to walk away from the perks of being a member of the Apple camp.

    For example, the revamped SanDisk Sansa View has double the memory and a slightly bigger screen than the new iPod Nano, plus an FM tuner, microphone, and expansion slot, and it costs the same amount. Is it as nice looking? Meh, it's getting hard to tell at this point, if you value functionality over form. Even the Zune—with a capacity and price equal to the iPod—is starting to look decent, with its well-designed interface, strong styling, and broader format support.

    The one thing you'll miss out on is the ease-of-use of being locked into the iTunes/iPod symbiotic relationship. Depending on how comfortable you are with figuring out a new syncing set-up, this may or may not be an issue for you.

    The article brings up another potential drawback, depending on how you look at it: you won't find anywhere near the same aftermarket support when it comes to accessories and cases. But then again, if the product is made properly, it doesn't really need a case, whereas digital audio players that are designed to wear when working out usually come with straps or attachments.

    (Disclaimer: we rely on a screenless Shuffle, which has its own obvious drawbacks, and our Nokia phone, which would be perfect if not for the battery drain.)

    "Don't want an iPod? Lots of choices available" [Reuters]
    (Photo: Getty)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-308689 Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:08:12 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=308689&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Target Won't Refund New iPod Box Found Full Of Rocks...Twice ]]> Melanie Ritter thought she was buying a video iPod from Target for her daughter's birthday, only to open the box and find rocks inside. Imagine how much more disappointed she was the second time this happened.

    I've heard of rocking out to your iPod, but this is ridiculous!

    When Ritter tried to exchange the first iPod, they didn't have the same iPod in stock. When she asked for a full cash refund, Target said they could only give her in-store credit because Mrs. Ritter had bought the box of rocks on a store credit card. She drove to a second Target which did have the iPod in stock. She asked to open the box first but the store said she had to buy it before she could open it. She did, and opened it in front of the employee, only to find it too was only filled with rocks. Defeated, Mrs. Ritter told her daughter to pick out $350 worth of merchandise around the store for her birthday present. Then Mrs. Ritter contacted a consumer reporter who has only been able to get pat boilerplate answers out of Target so far.

    Sigh. Ok. Here we go. One, Target obviously has a supply chain problem in the Fort Worth, TX with assholes replacing iPods with rocks. Two, Mrs. Ritter might have had more success getting a full refund at that first store if she had called Target's 1-800 line while she was in that store, or asked for a manager. Escalate. Don't just accept the laminated notebook answer the grunts give you. This was obviously an extenuating circumstance where the no refund policy should have been waived, and it takes someone in a position of higher authority to do that.. Shoppers have a policy of their own, it's called the "we don't accept rocks in place of my iPod" policy.

    Mom upset by Target's tune in iPod case; teen celebrates rocky birthday [Star-Telegram] (Thanks to Ryan!)
    Rocks found in place of girl's brand new iPod... twice [ArsTechnica]
    (Photo: Getty)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-308658 Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:16:57 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=308658&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ iPod Lights Your Pants On Fire, Not In A Good Way ]]> nanofire.jpg"So I look down and I see flames coming up to my chest," said Danny Williams. His iPod Nano, and subsequently, his pants, were on fire.

    Worse, he was in an airport. "If TSA had come by and seen me smoking, they could have honestly thought I was a terrorist," said Williams. That would have been bad.

    Apple is willing to replace the device, but William's mom called the media because she was concerned about other people's pants lighting on fire. We can understand that. The Nano is powered by the notoriously fire-prone lithium-ion type of battery, says WSB news.

    WSB in Atlanta called Apple to see how common the problem was:

    After Channel 2 sent Apple pictures of the iPod, they called back but they refused to say how common the problem is. In fact, Apple refused to talk about this particular incident at all. "

    Man's Pants Catch Fire At Airport [WSB] (Thanks, Aaron!)
    (Photo:WSB)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-307566 Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:13:24 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307566&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ iPods + Lightning = Debate ]]> The debate continues about what effect wearing an iPod has when/if you are stuck by lightning. Some say the earbuds conduct the electricity away from the jogger's head. Other say that it directs it through his head.

    The final word: Don't jog during thunderstorms. "..much of the very interesting debate that has followed the publication of this case report would perhaps be unnecessary if common sense were as ubiquitous as the iPod," says the New England Journal Of Medicine.

    [WSJ Health Blog]

    ]]>
    Consumerist-306909 Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:46:35 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=306909&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Apple May Be Plotting iTunes Movie Rental Service ]]> icat.jpgAccording to CNNMoney, Apple may be plotting an iTunes movie rental service that would allow iPod users to rent and watch a movie for 30 days without purchasing the entire film. Rumors place the rental fee at about $2.99.

    "Rights management" software would allow the movie to be played on either an iPod or iPhone for the duration of the rental period. CNNMoney points out that Video On Demand has proved lucrative for cable and satellite providers—and none of them have as many customers as Apple.

    That being said, we've never really understood the desire to watch a whole movie on an iPod. To each his own, we guess.

    iTunes movie rentals? Maybe soon [CNNMoney]
    (Photo:Earth2Kim)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-299179 Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:24:27 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=299179&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ How To Protect Electronics At The Beach ]]> Electronics don't mix well with the beach; sand, sun, and water all conspire to cause damage that isn't covered by most warranties. By taking a few basic precautions, you can safeguard your gadgets from the elements.

    Cover Your Ports: Sand can wreak havoc on exposed ports. Tape shut any ports you don't need.
    Fear The Sun: Protecting against the sun's harmful rays is as easy as tossing your iPod into a beach bag or under a blanket.
    Buy A Case: Bringing electronics near the water is asking for trouble, but if you must, buy a waterproof case; save the DIY effort for another project.

    If the elements do manage to breach your defenses, send them on their way with a can of compressed air.

    Protecting Your Electronic Devices at the Beach [KABC]
    (Photo: dan taylor)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-278469 Sat, 14 Jul 2007 08:36:27 EDT Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=278469&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ RESOLVED: Geek Squad Fixed My iPod By Sending Me A Broken One ]]> When Charlie's iPod died, again, she took it to Best Buy, again, as it was under one of those extended warranties they push. What she got back in the mail was an even more messed up iPod. When she took it to the store, they were kinda jerks about it. After her complaint got posted here, Best Buy swooped in.

    That's Charlie in the picture, holding her new iPod. She writes:

    The General Manager of services sent me an e-mail with a direct phone number to contact him and he took down my information and sent me an upgraded 60 gig iPod video which arrived this past Tuesday. It is still a refurbished model, but it is in great condition. He apologized for my inconvenience and explained that all units are checked before they are shipped out. He also requested that next time I come to him first if anything like this should happen.

    But on another note, I really want to thank you and Meghann for your website. You've helped me out a lot, and tons of other people from what I read every day. Thanks a bunch and keep up the good work!

    Hooray for Charlie, and to Best Buy, for having an RSS reader. — BEN POPKEN

    PREVIOUSLY: Geek Squad Fixed My iPod By Sending Me A Broken One

    ]]>
    Consumerist-261506 Fri, 18 May 2007 01:11:02 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=261506&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Slideon: The Mp3/Video Player With Sliding iPod Killer Controls ]]> This audio/video player designed by Consumerist Flickr pool member unleashedlive features a sliding control panel that hides under the playing screen, just like with a slider cellphone. The maker of this 3d rendering says it would use flash memory and be chargeable via the headphone jack.

    Here's one in black.

    We love our Flickr pool, it is filled with the work of talented, industrious and clever people! — BEN POPKEN

    ]]>
    Consumerist-260947 Wed, 16 May 2007 13:49:14 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=260947&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Geek Squad Fixed My iPod By Sending Me A Broken One ]]> Charlie gave her 4th gen iPod to Geek Squad for warranty repair. They promised her a new iPod in return. Instead, she received an iPod with a sad face screen. When she shook it, its hard drive rattled around. There was a ding in the side. The back of the iPod was buffed shiny, so much so you couldn't hardly see the iPod logo. When she took it back to the store, she says they were kinda obnoxious to her. The iPod is sent away again, but her hopes are not high.

    This is Charlie's second Consumerist story, she also gave us this one in these two posts, Apple Won't Sell You A Computer Because You've Got Too Many Gift Cards, and UPDATE: Apple Will Sell You A Computer If You've Got Too Many Gift Cards!

    Perchance this one will also result in a toothsome thumbs up?

    Charlie's letter, and more pictures, inside...


    clearback3.jpg

    clearback.jpg

    dent.jpg

    quality%20tested.jpg

    sadface.jpg

    Charlene writes:

    A week ago the hard drive in my 4th generation iPod failed for the second time. The first time this happened, I took my iPod to the Geek Squad and had them fix it under Best Buy's warranty. They said I could expect it back in around 4 weeks. Over two months later, I had not heard from them, and I called about my iPod. They lost it. No, it was at the warehouse. No, it hadn't shipped yet. No, it was being worked on. I was finally told that if my iPod did not come in the next day that I would be getting a brand new one. It came the next day.

    Okay, fast forward about one year to last Saturday. I took my iPod back to the Geek Squad and gave it to them again. I was told that it would be sent off for Rapid Exchange and that "basically, just don't worry about this one any more and you'll get a new one in about a week and a half" A new iPod! I was very excited. In one week I got an iPod in the mail. The box said it was a refurbished 4th generation. Not exactly new. Oh well. Then I opened the box. I took out the iPod, and the first thing that I noticed was that they buffered the back of it until it was as shiny as a mirror. I couldn't even see the Apple logo or the serial number unless I held it at just the right angle. Then I found a dent on the side of it! A perfect little ding! I was so frustrated, but I needed my iPod for work, so I went to load it up anyways. Well, I tried to turn it on, and the hard drive was also dead. Not just dead, but you could feel all of the parts inside shaking around!

    I took the iPod back to the Geek Squad and I was furious. I wanted to talk to a manager. Unfortunately, I barely talked to anybody. Anyone with any competence at least. The one guy who seemed to know what he was doing was having problems with HIS computer. He had to call a Best Buy employee to show him how to work their POS system. The guy that he put me off on wasn't any better. I pointed at the box with a "Quality Tested" sticker printed on it (twice), and he just laughed. I told him about how I had so much trouble the LAST time I wanted to get my iPod fixed, and he just said to his buddy, "Were you working here then? I wasn't either. Man, that sucks" I was so furious that I couldn't even yell or be rude at them... I knew it would all be wasted. Then he was holding the iPod in his hand and said, "Man, this thing really is busted!" Good job, Einstein.

    Anyways, so their solution? Mail it off, try again!!! I didn't know that I was getting somebody else's broken iPod. I could have just kept mine. And now, I'm waiting to get ANOTHER used and probably broken iPod in the mail. Why couldn't they have just fixed mine? I was under the impression that I was getting a brand new iPod, and I willingly gave them my broken one. This is not what I bargained for.

    Good luck, Charlene, Maybe this time they will get it right. Never forget the power of calling up customer service and complaining. They might be able to hook you up with something for your troubles. And bear in mind, you can always contact the CEO of Geek Squad by emailing info@geeksquad.com with the subject line, "For Robert." — BEN POPKEN

    ]]>
    Consumerist-258416 Mon, 07 May 2007 19:12:04 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=258416&view=rss&microfeed=true