<![CDATA[Consumerist: grocery shrink ray]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: grocery shrink ray]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/grocery shrink ray http://consumerist.com/tag/grocery shrink ray <![CDATA[ Ben Popken On NBC Nightly News This Thursday ]]> Watch NBC Nightly News on Thursday, 12/04/08, for a snippet of yours truly, Ben Popken, laying down some tough talk on the good 'ol Grocery Shrink Ray, THE STORY THAT NEVER DIES!!! MUAHAHA!

]]>
Consumerist-5101066 Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:24:14 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5101066&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Holistic Margin Management": What General Mills Calls Grocery Shrink Ray ]]> Guess what they call the Grocery Shrink Ray at General Mills? "Holistic Margin Management." I thinks that's also what they call it in 1984. Another interesting fact from a StarTribune article looking at shrinking packages: customers are more likely to notice a change in the height rather than the width of a box. But does anyone really care?

While we've done many shrink ray posts, I've wondered how much the non-Consumerist-reading population has noticed. Well, an October '07 survey found 47% of consumers said they noticed packages were becoming more diminuative. Since the pace, and the coverage, of shrinking packages has greatly increased since then, that number surely must be higher. Don't forget to compare unit prices!

Freshly squeezed: The ever-shrinking box and carton [StarTribune] (Thanks to al koholic!) (Photo: Mykl Roventine)

]]>
Consumerist-5100974 Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:39:44 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5100974&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Gorton's Wants To Know If You Noticed Anything Fishy About Their Fish Sticks ]]> Reader Dave was doing an online survey about Gorton's Fish Sticks packaging — and it looks like something fishy is going on...

Dave says:

I was doing an online survey and was questioned about my opinion on fish-sticks.

I'm sure other readers would also note the difference, however, they must assume the panelists to be daft.

What else was I expected to notice? His slicker is now Land's End?

I probably won't be empaneled any time soon.

Here are the questions Dave was asked:

Perhaps this is too deep a look into the minds that are responsible for the Grocery Shrink Ray. The abyss stares back and all that...

]]>
Consumerist-5056358 Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:08:25 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5056358&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 34 Victims Of The Grocery Shrink Ray ]]> The story may be well and established already, but that hasn't stopped manufacturers from their food product and package shrink-a-dink rampage. Here's 34 more victims of The Grocery Shrink Ray spotted by the all-volunteer Consumerist tipster army, 25 of which are viewable using advanced pop-up slideshow technology...

Note: The photo gallery was malfunctioning yesterday, so now that everything is fixed, I'm moving the post back up the page.

Click on a picture below to see it larger and read the tipster's dispatch.


Rich writes: "Boo-hoo. Noticed in my office snack shop today: My favorite pack, 17-sticks, of Big Red chewing gum is now only 15-sticks. Same price. Found this press item: "This cool new pack will make these brands more contemporary and give them a better presence on the shelf," President and Chief Executive Bill Perez said. Should also improve their profits!!!

Michael writes: "We normally buy 40 lb bags of Canidae brand dog food for our dogs. This week the 40 lb bag has now mysteriously transformed into a 35 lb bag, and of course the price is the same. Maybe it's for our convenience that the bags are lighter."

Dale writes: "The shrink ray has hit Burger King waffle cone. On Wed & Sun, they are only $1.29 (used to be $0.99) I noticed that not only has it shrunk in size, but the waffle cone taste terrible. Seems like they switched manufactures to make the waffle cone part. Maybe they only use the cheep cones on Wed & Sun."

Rich writes: "You might want to investigate so called "solid pack" White Albacore Tuna, most notably Chicken of the Sea and Bumble Bee. They now contain an inordinate amount of water in their packaging...After draining the can there is far less tuna and far less "solid" chuncks, about one third of the product looks like counter-scrapings. "

Lee writes: "I have noticed in the local Wal Mart (Washington Square Shopping Center, near Ferry Farm, in Fredericksburg, Virginia) that they rolled back the price on the large bags of Meow Mix cat chow from $10.26 down to $10 even. What they did not tell you was that the bags have shrunk from 18 lbs down to 16 lbs. I wish I had photos of this but they tend to frown on people taking pictures inside of the store."

Jonas writes: "Dreyers Ice Cream has also gone to !.5 Quarts = 48 oz.
Dreyers is Nestle
1/2 Gallon = 64 oz
1,75 Quarts = 56 oz
1.50 Quarts = 48 oz"

Anda writes: "Great, I thought. I'll finally be able to get that last little bit I lose to the rim of the can. Nice, square plastic pop-top canister, but a little more compact. I was completely suspicious. I work in graphic design and packaging, so I know what a redesign means for the consumer. I decided to check out the bottle ratio on the back. Lo and behold, Similac is trying to pull one over on the poor consumer. The large canister now only makes 27 6oz bottles at the same price of $22.99."

Raymond writes: "Folgers coffee (100 Colombian) just got attacked by the mighty Grocery Shrink Ray. Can't get a pic because of quality, but it had 988 grams and now as 798; a fifth of the original amount gone."

Chris writes: "My name is Chris and I work at Safeway/Vons. The product in question is Tuna Helper. Today in checkout someone bought about eight boxes of it, and six failed to scan (item not found). Me and the other checker turned them over to find that the last 5 digits of the UPC were different. I began looking over the boxes...until I looked at the weight. The boxes that wouldn't scan (I'm guessing because they haven't been put in our system yet) are 7.1 Ounces, while the older boxes were 8 ounces. Side-by-side, you can't tell the difference between the two boxes, as the cardboard part of the box is the same exact size. Only the contents inside have changed in quantity. This is the first instance I've ever seen of this happening, and I'm not sure of it spreading anywhere outside of California. I'm also unsure of if it affects Hamburger Helper as well."

BettiePageMommie writes: "I had been buying my son Nutripals fruit bars for snacks since he is a very picky eater and I thought it would be a nutritious snack he could have and enjoy.

The bars in the first few boxes I purchased were of decent size, length and width- wise. Length- wise, I would say they are about 5- 6 inches and I'd say width- wise, about the size of two pinky fingers beside each other. Then more recently I bought a box and the bars are HALF the size width- wise than what I had been receiving. SAME PRICE, less product. These things can go for as much as $3.50- 5 for a box of 6, depending on where you shop. I feel jipped.

I don't have any pictures to upload because my son has already eaten the bigger bars, and we only have the small crappy sized bars left. I doubt I'll be buying them again. They do have drinks you can buy, and my son loves those. I haven't seen a size reduction in those. YET."

Tropicana writes:

"We appreciate the opportunity to address your concerns about our new 89 oz SNAP Cap bottle.

Our decision to improve our bottle was not recent. Based upon feedback from families where children pour their own juice, we began working on this new package concept more than two years ago. The idea was to have an innovative cap that easily and securely sealed just by pressing on it, and one that easily poured without "glugging," the primary reason for spilling.

The downsizing from 96 to 89 ounces wasn't a decision we took lightly. As you are aware, oil costs have skyrocketed. Oil is used to make plastic bottles, fuel our factories, and ship our juice across the country in refrigerated trains and trucks. We had the choice to either increase prices or to downsize the bottle. We chose to downsize the bottle but add value through the innovation of the SNAP cap and new bottle, which consumers were seeking.

Although you may not agree with our decisions, we hope you can appreciate that they were made in the best interest of our consumers and shareholders. Please be assured that feedback from consumers, such as yourself, does influence decisions, and your comments have been shared with our marketing group.

We value your business, Glen, and have mailed coupons to use toward a future purchase. Again, thanks for your input and sharing your concerns.

Theresa
Tropicana Consumer Response"

ELSEWHERE:

For ideas on defeating the shrinking-product-same-price phenom, read 3 Ways To Beat The Grocery Shrink Ray.

Got a hot grocery-shrink-ray tip? Send your pictures and stories to tips@consumerist.com

PREVIOUSLY:
15 Victims Of The Grocery Shrink Ray
Entire Grocery Shrink Ray thread

]]>
Consumerist-5033568 Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:00:00 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033568&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Video: The History Of Maxwell House Shrinkage ]]> This video shows how a variety of food products have shrunk over the years, while the price remains the same, and the tricks manufacturers use so we don't notice the differences. She stacks up the coffee cans as they go from 16 oz to 11 oz. At one point, Maxwell House says that while the size is going down, the potency is going up. "We've fluffed the beans!" they say. So then why do the instructions on the side of the can for the amount of coffee you use to make a perfect cup stay the same? Though we don't really mourn for lost Maxwell House value, the example is illustrative of standard industry tactics, even on food that doesn't taste like crap.

Food Amounts Shrink Over Years, But Containers Are Same Size [WTAE] (Thanks to Kevin!)

]]>
Consumerist-5047816 Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:20:47 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5047816&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Get Ready For An Onslaught Of Food Advertising ]]> Foodmakers are planning to bombard you with advertising to keep you from ditching their carefully groomed brands for some blechy cheapo generics. Pay no attention as they try to re-brand their products as cheap and affordable. Here's a small preview of what to expect...

From Sara Lee Corp.'s new ad campaign with The Walt Disney Co.'s "High School Musical 3: Senior Year" to Kraft's new pizza commercials preaching "DiGiornonomics," consumers should expect to be blitzed by food advertisements in the next year.

Many major food makers are promising boosts to their advertising in the new fiscal year or reporting their spending is up in the most recent one. Their ads seem to be hitting a variety of outlets, including print, television, in-store promotion and the Internet — which marketers say helps them hone in on consumers and get the most bang for their advertising buck.

Analysts say it makes sense, even as these companies grapple with high prices for oil, corn and grains.

Consumers aren't going to change what they eat as they pull away from restaurants, said Harry Balzer, vice president of consumer research firm the NPD Group, and an expert on American eating patterns. They're just going to look for bargains, and that can mean changing brands.

"It's very hard for us to change our behavior. If we like ice cream, we're going to continue eating ice cream," he said. "Now the question is going to be what brand you're going to buy."

Remember, the Grocery Shrink Ray goes wild over brands. Savvy consumerists know to resist the advertising, and will see this as an opportunity to reaffirm their unending allegiance to the lowest price.

Foodmakers plan big ad campaigns in down economy [AP]
(Photo: GirlReporter)

]]>
Consumerist-5046495 Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:00:01 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5046495&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Want That Hot Restaurant Reservation? Ask With A European Accent ]]> The parasitic Grocery Shrink Ray has infected restaurants, shrinking portions and spurring substitutions as restaurateurs struggle to pry revenue from cash-strapped customers. Desperate to fill seats by any means, restaurants are borrowing from the airlines and are starting to overbook reservations for peak times. They're also giving preference to the new big spenders: Europeans.

Many restaurants are trying to sate diners and give them a sense of plenty for the lowest price possible.

“You have to be smart as a restaurateur and a chef and say, what’s the most value I can put on this plate so it looks like a lot of food and still appears to be a value and doesn’t anger anyone?” Ms. Taras Wallach of Little Giant said.

“I serve a lot of grits,” she added.

And many restaurants are trying harder than ever not to let any seats go to waste. Ms. Arpaia said that at Mia Dona she is accepting more reservations between 7 and 9 p.m. rather than steering diners toward early and late times that they might reject. Even if this means lengthening diners’ waits for reserved tables, she, like other restaurateurs, wants to make sure that no-shows don’t cost the restaurant money.

“I’d rather have people wait at the bar and buy them a free drink than not get them in the door,” she said, adding that she knows of other restaurants acting in a similar, extra-cautious fashion.

“You should see, when [the Europeans] come in the door, the shopping bags they hand off to the coat check,” said Graceanne Jordan, the general manager at the Modern, which is part of the Union Square group and is near the shopping corridors of Madison and Fifth Avenues.

“I mean, they’re just spending. It’s Monopoly money to them.”

So if you want that prime-time reservation, break out your best cash-happy faux-Euro accent and ask: "Sir? SIR! Ver eez my täbel, monsieur?"

As Belts Tighten, Lobsters Shrink and Bar Menus Grow [The New York Times]
(Photo: Sherry's Rose Cottage)

]]>
Consumerist-5046305 Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:25:45 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5046305&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Arm & Hammer Baking Soda Now Deodorizes For 30 Days Instead Of 3 Months ]]> Reader Kirin says he's suspicious of Arm & Hammer's assertion that the same 1lb of baking soda will only deodorize for 30 days when it used to work for 3 months.

I try to preempt nasty smells in the refrigerator by buying one of those handy Fridge-N-Freezer baking soda boxes where you can simply tear off the sides and allow it to absorb odors. But in the past three months, it looks like marketing got a hold of the packaging, and suddenly baking soda only works for one month instead of three! Arm & Hammer say that they are "America's #1 trusted baking soda brand," but I'm not really feeling the trust anymore...

How very, very odd. Arm & Hammer says that their baking soda is 100% pure sodium bicarbonate, so we're assuming they haven't changed the recipe. They also haven't updated their FAQ. It still recommends changing the box every 3 months.

]]>
Consumerist-5038320 Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:52:59 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5038320&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Hits Folgers, Makes More Cups From Less Coffee? ]]> Here's a fun little mystery for you guys. How can taking away 4 oz of coffee produce more cups of coffee? We've been thinking about it ever since Blueprint for Financial Prosperity sent us this photo the other day, and we just can't figure it out. Could it be magic? Some strange new property of the Grocery Shrink Ray?

Blueprint for Financial Prosperity says:

I bought a can of Folgers coffee two days ago from Costco. When I compared it to my last can, also from Costco, I saw that the new one had 4 oz less of ground coffee. Ok, no big deal, but then I saw that the small can claimed to make more coffee than the larger can. This is the first time I've seen a company shrink their product but claim you get more. It's not a matter of coffee potency either, the preparation instructions are the same.

Now we're not math geniuses or anything here, so please do let us know if we're missing something or messed this up but, the preparation instructions are in tablespoons (volume) and the product is sold by weight... but the ingredients say that both cans contain 100% pure coffee. Has the density of coffee changed lately?

Hmm, let's see. ρ=m/V, and 1 tablespoon is 15 cm³... 360 6 oz cups...

By our calculations, the old density of Folgers coffee was .272 g/cm³ and the new density is .238 g/cm³. Did you guys get the same thing?

The shrink ray is getting more complicated all the time.

Folgers Coffee: Magic Shrink Ray Make More From Less [Blueprint For Financial Prosperity]

]]>
Consumerist-5031691 Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:45:13 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031691&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 15 Victims Of The Grocery Shrink Ray ]]> The Grocery Shrink Ray continues its miniature spree across the supermarket aisles of America. Here's 14 more victims that have surfaced in the past week, as spotted by our watchful bands of deputized Consumerist reader-investigators...

Click on the pictures to start an awesome gallery

 Pat says, "My husband works long shifts overnight at our local air force base and he loves to eat Nature Valley chewy trail mix bars. I had just heard your interview on NPR when I went to Sam’s Club to the weekly supplies for his lunch and low and behold, they shrunk the granola bars. The box costs $8.28, which was reasonable for 35 bars LAST WEEK but THIS WEEK for the same $8.28 the box had shrunk and it contains 30 bars. My husband says that is a 17% increase in price per unit. Don’t know about the math but it is much less for the money. I have attached a picture depicting last week’s trailmix and this week’s trailmix."  Joe writes: "At our BiLo Supermarket in Blk Mtn, NC, I'd been purchasing their 1 lb bag 44596 12725 For $9.99. When buying it again a week ago, I saw only one of that size bag in front of 3/4 lb bags. Since buying that last one then, this week I checked there and sure enough that price is the same for the now 25% smaller bags." Case writes:"The Grocery Shrink Ray has targeted my beloved Monster Energy! It's not right, I tell you! For YEARS, Monster has come in 16oz cans. Now they are robbing me of a whole ounce of hypertension and diabetes-inducing goodness! NOOOOOO! This on top of the fact that the average price per can at the gas station has gone from $2 to $3 over the last couple of years. Is nothing sacred?!?"
 Jeff writes, "Delallo Red Wine Vinegar old package 32oz, new bottle 25.4oz and still being sold for the same price of $2.79."  Scott writes, "While on vacation in Tennessee this week with my partner we stopped to enjoy some breathtaking views of the Smoky Mountains. After having our breath taken away we decided to each get a bottle of water. The nearby Coke vending machine advertised 12oz cans of Coca-Cola brand sodas or a 12oz bottle of Dasani water for only $1. Not a bad deal for vending machines these days. I went first, put in my $1 bill, pressed the button for the Dasani water & out came a 10.1 oz Dasani bottle (see photo). Grrrrrr. Severely displeased, my partner decided to call the customer service number on the machine. To our surprise, the customer service rep was courteous, apologetic, said that this should not be happening & that someone would be sent to correct the situation (she asked us to provide her with the identifying information off of the machine). After all of that, she took our information & will be sending us a refund for the $1 we paid (without us even asking for the refund). So, we went from unhappy to satisfied in under two minutes. Yay(?)"  Sean writes, "So I was browsing Target to get some more trash bags, and I stumbled upon my favorite brand’s new box. It looks like they have a new scented version out. And apparently this new scented coating must be really thick, cause they took 6 bags out of the same size box, and they want to charge me the same price. I guess with everything else shrinking, Hefty must think were generating less trash as well. Needless to say I’m buying the box with more bags in it."
Christopher writes, "I'm a frequent eater at the Subway located at Mendenhall and Winchester in SE Memphis as it's near my office and comparatively healthy to the other nearby options. My regular sandwich is either a 6" Roast Beef or Turkey on their honey oat bread. I went in this afternoon for a Roast Beef, and the preparer (food jockey?) only put 3 slices of Roast Beef on the sandwich. I noticed that the lady in front of my had a footlong Turkey and only got 6 slices. The problem is, last week (and as far back as I can remember) 6" sandwiches got 4 slices of meat and footlongs got 8. As you can see in the attached picture, 3 slices of meat leave a significant hole in the sandwich. I asked the manager on duty, and his response was that it was new policy due to rising costs. I realize I could be making my own sandwiches at home, but now I have a strong incentive to do so...$6.19 for a 6" substandard sub no longer cuts it."  Scott writes, "I just went to the store & bought the new shapely bottles of Tropicana Orange Juice. Though the bottle is smaller from 96 oz to 89 oz the bottle shape is the same dimensions (L*W*H). They just "squeezed" the sides of bottle inward."  Ethan writes, "Noticed this at target today."
 Scott writes, "I noticed a little while ago that the packaging had shrunk for this jerky maker. At the time, I looked but the portion size stayed the same - 4oz per container. I thought something was amiss and kept checking but could never find proof until Thursday night. They now shrunk what you get and keep it at the same price. I took these pictures at 7-11 with my cell phone and tried to get the price and size in both. They were both marked at $5.99 even though one package clearly was marked at 3.5 oz and the other marked at 4 oz. Almost all of the 4 oz packages were gone and I made sure that I got both in Original flavor in case of discrepancy with flavor and cost."  Katie writes, "I was running low on napkins at work. Much to my chagrin, I noticed the old Bounty package contained 20 more napkins 6 months ago than the package I bought today. Not exactly the quicker picker upper I expected. All I had was the empty wrapper of the old one so my sister came up with a great idea on photographing this shrinkage. When will the madness end?? -Katie Cleveland, OH"  Matthew writes,"Even after reading your site daily I still got caught by the grocery shrink ray yesterday. My favorite Margherita pepperoni packages shrunk from 6 oz to 4.5 oz since the last time I bought them. I took a picture of a package I had at home and the new one. "







































According to this article, the Grocery Shrink Ray could be hitting all of Pepsi products. (Thanks to Mike!)


Ed writes, "I shopped at the Walmart I regularly go to for, among other things, Gillette Mach 3 replacement blades. They have been available in 4, 8, and 12 packs for seemingly ever. The unit pricing for each was typically very close. 4 packs were about $8.25, 8 packs were $16.45, give or take.

Today, I discovered that the 4 pack is now a 5 pack. The insidious part is that the unit price per blade in the 4 pack went from about $2.06 in the 4 pack to $2.25 in the 5 pack, while the 8 pack unit price did not go up as much - $2.10 from $2.06. While I get that it is very common for bigger volume packs to have a lower unit price, this was not the case for this product. This had held true for at least 5 years.

The other interesting aspect of this is that P&G did the opposite of the "shrink ray." They grew/expanded the content and they sharply increased the price for that package. "

Brian writes,"I've been making my world (read: within my household) famous nachos for years now, and always with the same ingredients. The final part of cooking up the topping is a 15 oz. can of Hunts Tomato Sauce, a 4 oz. can of diced jalapenos (either Ortega or La Victoria), and an 8ish oz. can of diced ortega chiles. All of the items came in their normal sizes at their normal prices, but they are all far more watery than they have been in the past. I noticed it as I poured them into the pan, and now that they've been simmering for a good 20 minutes, it's far, far thinner than usual. I think there may be some companies watering down their ingredients rather than making the serving size smaller. Is this the grocery version of water-diluted gas?"

Got a hot grocery-shrink-ray tip? Send your pictures and stories to tips@consumerist.com.

]]>
Consumerist-5027266 Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:59:59 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5027266&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Hits UK ]]> The Grocery Shrink Ray has expanded its range and is no longer just hitting the US. Pint-sized woe has befallen the the UK snack section. For one, the Dairylea triangle is shrinking from 180 to 160g per cheese wheel. Other shrunken products include Rolo, Palmolive, Olvatine, Dairy Milk, Mars bars, Yorkie chocolate bars, and Pringles.Check out the company double-talk as they tried to explain away the changes, sometimes with verbal softshoe, others with oddly pugilistic rebuttals:

Makers Kraft deny any trickery and claim they are merely "harmonising triangle weights across the range".

Cadbury spokesman Tony Bilsborough said: "The sizes of the bars goes up and down all the time to suit the market. Dairy Milk comes in all different shapes and sizes and there are a range of cost factors involved."

[Pringles] Spokesman Garry Stephenson said: "We launched a new Pringle with a better crunch texture, better flavour and a significant reduction in total fat and saturates."

Alex Beckett, from The Grocer magazine, says food firms are facing financially tough times and sympathised with their plight.

He said: "This isn't about ripping consumers off - the cost of making these products has rocketed because of more expensive food ingredients and energy costs. It's such a competitive marketplace with each manufacturer bitterly fighting with the next one.

"Downsizing portions and maintaining the original price isn't sneaky. It is a way of cushioning the blow to the consumer. Bumping prices up would hit people much harder.

"And besides, smaller portion sizes are healthier for consumers, especially at a time when obesity is so widespread. It won't do us any harm to be eating a little bit less."

Bollocks.

Our favourite snacks are being quietly downsized... so why's the price the same? [Daily Mirror] (Thanks to Deborah!)

]]>
Consumerist-5031667 Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:47:28 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031667&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Chicago Tribune Picks Up Grocery Shrink Ray ]]> The Chicago Tribune quoted me in a piece on the Grocery Shrink Ray. Paraphrasing a food science. expert, it says, "Broadly defined, packaging costs often outweigh ingredient costs, Hotchkiss said. And a penny shaved off packaging can translate into millions of dollars in savings for a high-volume consumer product." This is interesting because it means the greatest cost savings come from reducing package costs, rather than ingredient amount. Which means if they're reducing ingredient amounts, they've got to be really hurting. Maybe if I really wanted to do my part to help the economy I should have spent that stimulus check on juice, cereal, paper towels, mayonnaise and ice cream.

Rising costs give groceries nip and tuck [Chicago Tribune]

]]>
Consumerist-5030584 Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:45:01 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5030584&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Colgate-Palmolive has reported a 19% increase ... ]]> Colgate-Palmolive has reported a 19% increase in quarterly profits, and says it's partially due to price increases (but also greater volume sales and a weak dollar). [Reuters]

]]>
Consumerist-5030456 Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:38:57 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5030456&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Wegmans Grocery Store Admits That The Dreaded Grocery Shrink Ray Exists ]]> Wegman's a grocery store chain in the northeast has addressed the issue of the grocery shrink ray, and shed some light on why even store brands are affected by its malevolent beam. Wegmans says that their store brand merchandise is manufactured by companies that also make products for other stores — so they have little say about the size of their products.

Customers have asked why at least on Wegmans brand, we couldn’t keep size the same and just increase price (or better yet, keep size and price the same!). Wegmans brand suppliers often make products for other retailers (different recipes but same package size). It’s more costly for them to produce varying product sizes for different customers. So they often limit production to only one size; when costs rise sharply, it’s a new “smaller” container.

Well, that was refreshingly honest.

Up or Down? [Wegmans](Thanks, Aaron!)
(Photo: Tom Simpson )

]]>
Consumerist-5029914 Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:24:40 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5029914&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ I will be in a roundtable discussion guest ... ]]> I will be in a roundtable discussion guest be on KCRW's "The The Point" at 2:10 PM eastern today. You can listen here by clicking on the "LIVE" link at the top left, or tuning into your NPR affiliate station if they carry it. We'll be talking about the economy, the growing pressures on consumers, the grocery shrink ray, and what, if anything, you can do about it.

]]>
Consumerist-5028747 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:02:57 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028747&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Get Ready For More Supermarket Price Hikes ]]> The notorious Grocery Shrink Ray was supposed to help prevent this, or so we were told by apologists for it, but Datamonitor is reporting that Kraft Foods, Kellogg's, ConAgra, Sara Lee, and Tyson "are all expected to announce a hike in the prices of their products" in the near future. Here are some of the hikes you can expect, according to the Chicago Sun-Times.

  • Cereal makers General Mills and Kellogg Co. have both said they will raise prices. General Mills "said it needed to make up for cost increases that it expects will total 9 percent."
  • Kraft Foods, whose brands include Oscar Mayer, Philadelphia cream cheese, Oreos and Wheat Thins, will follow its 8% price increase earlier this year with another one to offset rising commodity costs.
  • Sara Lee will raise prices 20% for its meat products like Jimmy Dean sausages and Ball Park Franks. Sara Lee's COO gave this mangled explanation to Datamonitor: "Price increases vary a lot by type of products but the increases will be as low as zero and some products we will decrease on and other increases (will be) in excess of 20%."

The Chicago Sun-Times advises,

Overall grocery prices are expected to rise 5 percent to 6 percent this year. But some categories are projected to post higher increases, such as eggs, fats and oils and cereals.

A report by the Food Institute, a research group for manufacturers, predicted 2008 increases of at least 9 percent for those products.

"Grocery bills going up — again" [Chicago Sun-Times]
"US food firms to increase prices again" [Datamonitor] (subscription only)
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-5028085 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:15:44 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028085&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Hits Bausch & Lomb Contact Solution ]]> Joe spotted this box of Bausch & Lomb Boston contact solution at his Target, another victim of the Grocery Shrink Ray. "Someone at Target wasn't smart enough to change the original price label...4oz down to 3.5oz is significant when you are dealing with an everyday item like this at $7-7.99 per bottle," he writes. Full pic inside.

]]>
Consumerist-5027234 Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:17:10 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5027234&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Goes Down Under, Attacks Aussie Sprunch Hairspray ]]> Looks like the Grocery Shrink Ray took a working vacation down under this summer. Reader Meg tells us that her redesigned Aussie Sprunch hairspray shriveled from 12 ounces to 10.2 ounces. Gone too is an adorable yellow kangaroo, mercilessly consumed, we presume, by the insatiable Grocery Shrink Ray.

Meg writes:

Bought new hairspray the other day, and didn't notice until i got home that the new one had 15% less product in it for the same price. Bought this at ShopRite in NJ.

To keeping the public informed!

Notice how the tasty kangaroo was replaced by an eery "No Worries Guarantee."

Careful mates, the Grocery Shrink Ray silently lurks everywhere; but from the looks of our ongoing poll, that's how you like it, anyway. If you see a shrunken product, break out your camera and send your sighting to the tipline.

]]>
Consumerist-5027050 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:00:00 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5027050&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How Would You Like Your Inflation Served? ]]> The Mexican restaurant chain Chachos is now charging a 7.5% inflation surcharge on all meals with cheese. Skyrocketing commodity prices present restaurants with a menu of unappetizing choices: raise prices, levy surcharges, reduce portions? How would you like your inflation served? Vote in our poll, after the jump.

Reader Neal's receipt:

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

]]>
Consumerist-5027023 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:00:26 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5027023&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Zaps Skippy Natural Peanut Butter ]]> Pew! Pew! Grocery Shrink Ray zapped Skippy Natural Peanut Butter. You know what's really going to be something? When they start raising the prices on all the products they shrunk. Then we'll see some real purchasing power loss.

(Photo: Nathan Huth)

]]>
Consumerist-5026560 Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:38:57 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5026560&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Hits Faultless Spray Starch ]]> Mark says he's found fault with Faultless spray starch. The bottle shrunk by two ounces and is being sold for the same price, another victim of the Grocery Shrink Ray. Compare the products here and here. What's interesting is that when he called his mom, she said she had a different brand of starch spray. It too had shrunk by two ounces. Could manufacturers be colluding together to all decrease their products by the same amount at the same time? I've heard of price-fixing, but what about the legality of size-fixing? In any event, Mark emailed customer service about the new package. Their cheery reply, inside...

Dear Mark,

Thank you for your recent email regarding your experience with our new packaging for our Faultless Heavy Starch. We always welcome consumer and industry feedback, positive or negative, as we continually strive to improve our products.

We appreciate you letting us know your concerns about the new aerosol can we are using. We realize it is a significant change. The can we used previously was a 22 ounce, three piece can, with a welded seam. Because of how it is made, the old can uses significantly more steel and is more suspect to leaking along the seam if stored for a long period of time. Though the new two piece can does not come in a 22 ounce size, it has numerous other advantages over the three piece can.

By using less steel, the new can is more environmentally sustainable and reduces carbon dioxide emissions associated with the manufacture and distribution of our products. In addition to creating less waste, the new can has a longer shelf life, smaller diameter for better handling, and a more ergonomic design with a cap which is easier to remove.

For over 120 years, Faultless Starch/Bon Ami Company has taken great pride in providing the highest quality products. We hope you appreciate our efforts to be environmentally proactive while preserving an economical way to aid ironing and wrinkle removal by not raising our prices and passing on raw material increases to our valued customers.

Thank you again for taking the time to contact us. We would like to extend an offer of a few coupons as a thank you for your loyalty and support of our products and company. Please advise if this would be acceptable and provide a mailing address for the coupons.

Respectfully,

Annie Blackman
Consumer Specialist

]]>
Consumerist-5026026 Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:43:08 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5026026&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Hits White Rain Shampoo, But It's Still "33% More" ]]> Reader Luke noticed that the grocery shrink ray mercilessly zapped his bottle of White Rain shampoo— but mysteriously left the "33% more" label untouched. 33% more than... what exactly?

Luke says:

I've been using White Rain shampoo for years. It's in every Walgreens in the nation, and it is the cheapest shampoo ever. It's a dollar a bottle. It's always been a dollar a bottle. Ask anyone. It's also always been in a 590 mL bottle. But now they changed it to a 532 mL bottle. They still insist it's "33% MORE" than something.

Well, it certainly isn't 33% more than it used to be.

]]>
Consumerist-5025827 Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:59:58 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025827&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ This morning, very early in the morning, ... ]]> This morning, very early in the morning, we were on KTLK in Minnesota talking about, yep, you guessed it, the Grocery Shrink Ray. Clip is here. And earlier this week we were featured in an article in the UK's Observer.

]]>
Consumerist-5025559 Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:04:51 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025559&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 3 Ways To Beat The Grocery Shrink Ray ]]> Is your supermarket the victim of The Grocery Shrink Ray, the force that is shrinking how much product you get while keeping the price the same? Here are three antidotes:

1. Look for the old larger sizes still on shelves.

2. Compare unit costs
This is the number in the upper left of the price tag. A lower unit cost means a better deal.

3. Buy based on best value.
Reposition your thinking; instead of identifying yourself as "I'm a Corn Puffs guy, I've got to have my Pops," rationalize your thrift by saying, "I'm a money-saving guy, I've got to buy the best deal." Be willing to brand jump.

These tips won't completely negate the shrink ray, but at least they can partially counteract its effects.

]]>
Consumerist-5025256 Tue, 15 Jul 2008 07:48:44 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025256&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Lucerne Yogurt Fails To Escape The Clutches Of The Grocery Shrink Ray ]]> Nothing is safe from the Grocery Shrink Ray: not babies; not household brands backed by expensive ad campaigns; and apparently, not even discount private labels.

Jim writes:

A visit to my local North Texas Tom Thumb store on Wednesday revealed the latest target of the Grocery Shrink Ray: Lucerne Yogurt. Thankfully the stockers were helpful enough to place the new 6oz size right next to the 8 ouncers, which I'm willing to bet are not long for the shelf. Note that the 8oz size is "REDUCED FOR QUICK SALE". Lovely.

Quick, grocery products, cower behind the dressing or ice cream while there's still time!

]]>
Consumerist-5024634 Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:45:16 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5024634&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ This Colgate Toothpaste Packaging Is Awfully Deceptive ]]> Logan thought this bonus pack of Colgate contained two equally-sized tubes of toothpaste. After all, the boxes are exactly the same size. Yet when he opened the bonus box, he found a smaller box containing a mini tube of toothpaste.

Logan writes:

I bought some toothpaste last night as my wife an I had been surviving on tiny, dentist-issued travel tubes for the past couple weeks. We're lazy, so to save ourselves the trip after the next big tube was gone, I decided to buy a double pack of toothpaste. Thinking that the marginal savings of bundled toothpaste was the way to go, I grabbed a healthy sounding combo and was one may way. When I got home though, I was in for a big surprise. When I pulled the "Bonus" tube out of its box, it was actually in another, smaller box. Whaaaaat? Why the double boxing? Was it for packaging reasons? Or was it to hide the widespread reach and effectiveness of the the product shrink ray?

This isn't the feared Grocery Shrink Ray. This is deception, pure and simple. The weasels running Colgate's marketing team stuck to the law by printing the net weight on both boxes, but they clearly want consumers to assume that the boxes are the same size.

Way to waste an extra box, Colgate!

]]>
Consumerist-5024618 Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:15:41 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5024618&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Hits Ready Pac Produce? ]]> Andrew writes:

I work at a grocery store and am just appalled at how the grocery shrink ray is in full effect. I notice it the most is in the produce department. The company that is shrinking their products most effectively while maintaining the same price is Ready Pac.

About six months ago, Ready Pac introduced a new size for their dinner pack salad. It went from 16oz. to 12oz. The price stayed the same while the packaging shrunk. Their excuse was that it was best for the consumer because they wouldn't have to buy so much. Whatever! Another item that Ready Pac has targeted is their cut fruit bowls. They've gone from 1 pound and a couple oz to 15.5oz packages. They're still charging the same price too.

Companies to consumers: We're doing you a favor by decreasing your purchasing power.

(Photo: Ryan Grove)

]]>
Consumerist-5024554 Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:18:55 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5024554&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ For those of you who wanted a transcript ... ]]> For those of you who wanted a transcript of the NPR interview I did yesterday about the Grocery Shrink Ray, we added one here.

]]>
Consumerist-5024433 Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:32:29 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5024433&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Hits Kraft Swiss Cheese Singles? ]]>
Bruce sends in what he thinks is another victim of the Grocery Shrink Ray's fell and indiscriminate wrath:

I was shopping at my local HyVee here in Iowa the other day and noticed that Kraft Deli Fresh cheese slices have new packaging. Being an avid Consumerist reader I immediately suspected the grocery shrink ray.

The old packet, still visible on the Kraft website, contains 11 slices and weighs 8 oz, compared to 10 slices and 7 oz in the new one. The individual slices a little bit thinner now too, 8/11 > 7/10. Bruce is exactly right, if you see your old favorite now being sold in a new packaging, that's a red flag that you may looking at a slimmed-down package. However, Bruce did not send in shots of the price tags, which is necessary to determine if the item is truly grocery shrink ray shrunk. As such, we can only label this a potential victim for now.

DELI DELUXE - CHEESE - SWISS 2% MILK REDUCED FAT SLICES 11 CT [Kraft]

]]>
Consumerist-5023887 Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:33:12 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023887&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Ben Popken On NPR Talkin' 'Bout Grocery Shrink Ray ]]> NPR's Michele Norris on "All Things Considered" did a nice interview with me about that deadly Grocery Shrink Ray sweeping supermarkets across America. It looks like it just aired, you can listen to it online here. If you want to look at previous stories in the Grocery Shrink Ray series, check 'em out here. And if you have a example of a product that is shrinking in terms of volume or net weight and you want to submit it to us for a possible post, just send it on in to tips@consumerist.com.

UPDATE: Transcript added, inside...

Grocery Items: Same Price, Smaller Size [NPR]
(Partial image credit: hellochris)

TRANSCRIPT

Michele: Now we go from rising prices at the pump to shrinking products on grocery shelves. Your eyes are not playing tricks on you. Cereal boxes, juice containers, bars of soap, jars of mayonnaise. All these products and more really are getting smaller. But here's the hitch, you're buying less, but not paying less. Reducing the size of products is one way that manufacturers can cope with their soaring costs. Ben Popken is the editor of a consumer advocacy blog called Consumerist.com. He's been closely monitoring this trend, and he joins us now. Mr. Popken welcome to the program.

Ben: Hi, thanks for having me.

Michele: Now I'm just curious, have you been skulking around grocery store aisles looking for examples?

Ben: No, unfortunately, I sit in my blogging chamber upon high and I just receive reports from the readers, they dispatch what they're finding out at the supermarket.

Michele: And what are you hearing from the provinces?

Ben: I'm hearing the sound of shrinking, basically. What we call the "grocery shrink ray" is in full effect across America. Leaving all sorts of shrinking boxes and products in its wake.

Michele: Can you give me a few examples?

Ben: Definitely. Kelloggs, a wide variety of cereals are down 2.4 oz. Breyers Ice cream, 56 oz to 48 oz. Edy's Ice Cream, 1.75 quarts to 1.5 quarts. Dog Food... Butter...Country Crock is down 6%. It's just all over the board.

Michele: Now, these changes sound slight. I mean if you weren't looking out for this, would it be evident that the Country Crock tub is smaller than it used to be?

Ben: Probably not, unless you are some sort of savant who is able to memorize the net weight of all of the items that you purchase in your grocery trips, you are probably not going to notice it. But, right now we're in a crossover, a threshold phase where there are still a few of the old products left on the shelf, and when you see two different sizes being sold for the same price right there in front of you, that's when you notice.

Michele: You know there's always been talk about not wanting to break these benchmark amounts for product manufacturers. A gallon of milk for instance, or a pound of bacon. But it seems like we're seeing them cross that threshold now. I'm thinking of the half-gallon of ice cream, that was always the standard. That rectangular brick of ice-cream that you used to see in the frozen food section.

Ben: That is definitely no longer the case. There's a whole sort of secret underbelly in the ice cream world of who's delivering less and how much air is in it versus, you know cream and milk. Some brands even make it their marketing distinction, and they put it right on the label. Like, Brigham's Ice cream and Blue Bell Ice Cream they proudly state "Never Shrunk."

Michele: Do manufacturers ever alert customers? Or at least provide some information in the fine print that they're doing this? Does Wrigley for instance, note somewhere on the label that the 17 stick "Plenty Pack" is now a 15 stick?

Ben: The only disclosure that they are giving people is the different net weight and the amount of servings per package. The newest victim of the Grocery Shrink Ray that we saw today were these Kraft slices of swiss cheese and they're now giving 10 slices instead of 11 slices, and they're doing a different package. In this case there's a slight disclosure, but it has a little spin on it. There's a little green label and it says "sensible serving" so they're trying to tap it into the whole obesity crisis, and think that by giving you less for the same amount of money, decreasing your purchasing power, they're actually helping you out, fitness-wise.

Michele: Now, the food manufacturers will say that they're trying to get by too, they're facing rising fuel costs, rising commodity costs. So, they may be shrinking the package but they're doing that instead of raising costs, which might be much worse.

Ben: Well, I don't think that they're trying to do it to do anyone any favors, except for themselves. I mean everyone's got to get by. The economy is getting tighter, and I think everyone recognizes that. The problem is that they're trying to, you know, sneak it across the table without people noticing. So, when that works on the large swath of myopic consumers, that's great and that works out for them. But, when you have people who are actually paying attention to these things, then it's going to be a problem for both the consumer and the manufacturer because then people feel like they're being tricked. I think more and more people, as times are getting tougher, as people are watching their pennies more, they're becoming much more sensitive to value and these manufacturers maybe biting themselves in the butt.

Michele: Buyer Beware.

Ben: Definitely. Caveat Emptor.

Michele: There you go.

Ben: I mean the fact that the Romans were able to invent a word, it's nothing new.

Michele: Ben Popken, thanks so much it's good to talk to you.

Ben: Thanks Michele.

Michele: Ben Popken is the editor of a consumer advocacy blog called consumerist.com

]]>
Consumerist-5024071 Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:55:28 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5024071&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Hits Purina Dog Food ]]> Michael sends in this latest Grocery Shrink Ray victim, found at the Petsmart where he works. He writes, "The price is the same, and the 20lb bag is apparently being "upgraded" to an 18lb bag. This was the only 20lb bag left, but consumers who pay attention may be able to still be able to find some of the larger bags in stores."

]]>
Consumerist-5023450 Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:20:25 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023450&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Kraft Wants You To Know That The Grocery Shrink Ray Did NOT Zap Their Italian Dressing! ]]> Reader Max writes in to let us know that Kraft's Zesty Italian Dressing has (allegedly) not been hit by the dreaded grocery shrink ray— a fact that they proudly display right on the bottle!

Max says:

While I typically do not keep track of either the price or size fluctuations of my ordinary grocery purchases, this label jumped out at me. The label, for Kraft Italian salad dressing, prominently boasts "Still 16oz!". Whether this is a marketing reacting to the increased awareness of the 'grocery shrink ray' I cannot be certain. Unfortunately I do not have the price comparison available to see if Kraft has simply raised the price while keeping the same amount of salad dressing.

Resist, Kraft. Resist!

]]>
Consumerist-5021899 Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:33:24 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5021899&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Not Even Mini Babybel Cheese Can Escape The Grocery Shrink Ray ]]> Violating every conceivable standard of decency, the Grocery Shrink Ray has unleashed a heartless attack on baby cheese. Mini Babybels, those adorably pudgy wax-encrusted cheese cylinders, were once allowed to grow until they reached 132 grams. Now, the Babybel's are a stunted 120 grams.

Reader Heather recounts the unfortunate discovery:

I thought I'd bring to your attention Mini Babybel Cheese, which was one that surprised even me. I got a message from the cashiers saying it didn't scan, which I thought was ridiculous, since it's always been popular. But there you go, a whole 2g less per wax packet. Sigh. And, you guessed it, the price is staying the same.

All this shrinking makes a lot more work for poor file maintenance workers like myself. But ah well! Such is the way of things in this wacky world.

I have attached a few photos of the "offenders", including the original as well as the copy-cat. The original Babybel package was 132g in total, the new one is 120g. I looked at each cheese packet, and yes, there is a noticeable size difference between the two.

Thank you for your time, and keep up the great work, guys! I'll be sure to keep you guys informed if I notice anything particularly interesting.

]]>
Consumerist-5022312 Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:00:10 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5022312&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Zaps Pampers ]]> The grocery shrink ray doesn't just target food. It's coming after your baby's diapers.

Reader Sean says:

I bought 6 boxes of the old ones for the “free” 24 diapers.

Hey, don't worry about it. I'm sure you can just explain to your baby that it needs to stop pooing so much.

Or something.

]]>
Consumerist-5021619 Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:42:42 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5021619&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Ben Popken Talkin' 'Bout Grocery Shrink Ray In Various Media Outlets ]]> Media interest in The Grocery Shrink Ray sweeping across America continues, I was interviewed recently by CNNMoney.com, The Brian Lehrer Show, and Agence France-Press. Everyone knows prices are higher and manufacturers need to pass them on somehow. I don't like the method of shrinking sizes while keeping the prices the same. Or when they combine it with a package redesign, hoping we'll be so distracted by a new spigot that we won't notice we're getting less. My local pizza parlor went about it differently. They raised prices and taped up two articles explaining how rising wheat costs are driving up the cost of making pizza. They didn't, however, cut their pies into 12 slices instead of 8.

The Incredible Shrinking Portion [The Brian Lehrer Show]
US manufacturers beat inflation by selling less for same price [AFP]
Shrinking groceries [CNNMoney]

]]>
Consumerist-5021477 Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:11:49 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5021477&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Hits Arby's In OK-KS-MO-AR ]]> Starting this week, a few portions are smaller and prices higher at Arby's in the OK-KS-MO-AR region. Here's the aftermath:

AuJus sauce (by itself, not with meal): from free to $.50
Sandwiches in "Pick 5 for 5.95 combos": 2oz of sliced beef to 1.5 oz, 4" bun to 3.5" bun.
Sandwiches with cheese: $.10 increase

No word yet on whether this shrinking/price increase combo will spread to other regions.

One of the Arby's employees we spoke to over the phone said the changes were necessary because of rising costs, "of oil and stuff."

]]>
Consumerist-5021450 Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:56:47 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5021450&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Hits Arizona Ice Tea? ]]> It looks like the fell Grocery Shrink Ray may have hit cans of Arizona Ice Tea, reducing the size of their 12 oz cans to 11.5 oz cans. We couldn't find any definite pictures of 12oz Arizona Ice Tea cans, but we did find them being sold on this website in 12 oz cans. What happens to a product when the shrink ray hits it? I imagine it goes eek! eek! eek! and the last eek is an octave higher than the first.

(Thanks to Cynicor!)

]]>
Consumerist-5019235 Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:10:33 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5019235&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Grocery Shrink Ray Hits Publix, Yoplait Yogurt ]]> Where did those two ounces of yogurt go? The dreaded grocery shrink ray has blasted them to oblivion, my friends. Not even store brands are safe.

Josh says:

Publix did a great job not making it obvious — they pulled all of each flavor off the shelf before replacing it. But I found that one Mango one in the back and was able to make this comparison.



Speaking of not making it too obvious— these two containers look the same. Why does one have 6 ounces and the other have 4?


if you look at the bottom, that's where they get you. In the old days, the bottoms were flat. Now, not so much.

If you spot evidence of the ray's malevolent beam in your grocery store — take a photo and send it to us at tips@consumerist.com — or upload it to Flickr and submit it to our Flickr pool.

(Photos: Listener42

Listener42

Listener42 )

]]>
Consumerist-5020941 Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:36:18 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5020941&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Cheer Color Guard's Newer Scoop Wastes More Detergent, Money ]]> Adapting to the threat of informed consumers, the insidious Grocery Shrink Ray has mutated to enlarge select items. The Grocery Shrink Ray is seen here needlessly inflating the size of the scoop bundled with Cheer Color Guard detergent. Is Cheer encouraging consumers to burn through their product faster, or is the new Cheer simply less effective? Reader Mark investigates, inside...

Apparently the super-market shrink-ray has a "reverse" option too. I've been collecting and re-purposing old scoops from laundry detergent boxes for years now, and have almost exclusively been a Cheer Color Guard (or it's current incarnation) customer during that time. Rather than use the scoop from a new box, I usually just continue using the previous scoop. Therefore I can't tell you how old this one is, but it's at least three or four years old.

So the scoop on the left is an older one, used in the cheer boxes many years ago. The one on the right is a new one from a box I purchased this month. Notice anything immediately? If you're like me, you don't sit down and painstakingly measure out your detergent, you eyeball the partially filled scoop and pour. For years I've used about 3/4 scoop to wash my clothes, no problems. If I applied that logic to the same scoop from a new box of Cheer, I'd have been using significantly more in my laundry.

However, to give Cheer a fair chance, I decided to measure them out as per the directions on the scoop. Each has 3 levels. Medium, Large and Heavy Soil for the old scoop and a 1 and 2 for the new scoop. The new scoop however has three lines on it and the directions state they are for Medium Loads, Large Loads or Heavy Soiled Medium Loads and Large Heavy Soiled Loads. So to try and judge fairly, I filled the large scoop to the maximum amount (3rd line from the top) with water.

Looking at the two side by side, it actually appears that the larger scoop requires less detergent for a large heavy soiled load. Perhaps Cheer tweaked their formula over the years and I'm judging them harshly. So I decided to see, because it seems to take a completely full old scoop to equal what a 3/4 full new scoop does. So I poured the larger scoop into the smaller, attempting to transfer all of the liquid to the old one. I couldn't do it.

If you'll notice, not only is the smaller scoop completely full (including the handle) but there's still water left in the large scoop. Two and one-half tablespoons worth.

So my conclusions are either Cheer is either trying to gently encourage us to use more washing powder than necessary, or they've reformulated their detergent over the years to actually be less effective.

-Mark

If you catch the Grocery Shrink Ray in action, approach warily with a camera, and send the results to the tipline.

]]>
Consumerist-5020592 Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:55:38 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5020592&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Ben Popken On TV Talking 'Bout Shrinking Packages ]]> Here's the clip of yours truly, Ben Popken, on FOX 13 Tampa yesterday talking about the Grocery Shrink Ray that all the writers on the site have been doing a great job of covering. The interview was done over Skype webcam and I think it came out pretty well. "Shrinkage" and "downsizing" may be nothing new, but I think we're going to see more goods shrinking and by greater degrees in the coming months. It's practically a secret inflation. At the end of the story they say that some manufacturers are considering doing away with gallons of milk and instead selling 3/4 of a gallon, for the same price. If that happens, I think a lot more messages like the recording of the good ol' boy upset over the downsized Jimmy Dean's sausage are going to be left on customer complaint lines across America. As the guy in the New York Daily News shrinking package article (which I was also quoted in, whoo), said, "Soon people will be buying empty bags and empty boxes."

Shrinking packaging costing you more [Fox 13]

]]>
Consumerist-5018351 Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:54:57 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5018351&view=rss&microfeed=true