<![CDATA[Consumerist: Fuel Economy]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Fuel Economy]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/fuel economy http://consumerist.com/tag/fuel economy <![CDATA[ The 7 Most Fuel Efficient Used Cars Under $10,000 ]]> You're sick of your SUV and thinking of getting a car that's new to you, but which ones get the best gas mileage for the price? Consumer Reports has the answer — a list of the 7 most fuel efficient used cars for under $10,000.

Why buy used? Well, as CR says "depreciation accounts for 46 percent of the owner costs over a five-year period." Why not let someone else take the hit?

By focusing on a nearly-new model, say 2-3 years old, you can find a vehicle that offers comparable fuel economy, performance, safety, and reliability as a new car, often with some transferable warranty coverage remaining.

Amen! Anyway, here's the list. Some of the cars are older than 2-3 years, but hey. They're all under $10k.

Here's the list:

  1. 2000 Honda Insight (manual) 51 mpg
  2. 2001-02 Toyota Prius 41 mpg
  3. 2000-05 Toyota Echo 38 mpg
  4. 1998-2002 Chevrolet Prizm 32 mpg
  5. 1998 Mazda Protegé LX 32 mpg
  6. 1998-2000 Toyota Corolla LE 32 mpg
  7. 1998-2001 Acura Integra LS (manual) 32 mpg

Consumer Reports also has a list of the top cars from $10,000-$20,000, which you can view here.


Best used cars for fuel economy
[Consumer Reports]
(Photo: smcgee )

]]>
Consumerist-5035736 Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:30:22 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5035736&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ When Does It Make Financial Sense To Downsize Your Car? ]]>
Over at Consumer Reports they've been running the numbers, trying to figure out when it makes financial sense to downsize into a more fuel efficient car.

The big takeaway is that the more of your car you currently own, the more you stand to gain by switching:

If you are midway through a vehicle loan, as in the scenarios explored in this blog series, you may not have much equity (especially as you chase accelerating depreciation) in your vehicle, and it may make sense to stick it out for another year or two. The tipping point comes sooner depending on how much of the vehicle you truly own, versus the bank, and how great a sacrifice you are willing to make when downsizing.

There's no one-size-fits-all answer, but they have shared some helpful advice for those of you who are thinking of getting that Prius.

  • Don’t rush into downsizing without considering all the owner costs of your current vehicle, including depreciation and finance charges.
  • Understand your goals with downsizing (environmental concern, fuel savings, cost savings), and be sure your strategy will meet these goals...
  • In northern regions, consider using your SUV as a winter-only vehicle, especially if it enables you to buy an efficient, front-wheel drive car, rather than an all-wheel drive model. Be sure to adjust your insurance accordingly.

More info over at Consumer Reports.

Downsizing to the extreme [CR]
(Photo: geognerd )

]]>
Consumerist-5017386 Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:59:35 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5017386&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Poll: Can You Drive 55? Should We Bring The National Speed Limit Back? ]]> Remember the 55 mph speed limit? Remember... ignoring it? Wired's Autopia blog is wondering if we should consider bringing it back. Back in 1974 Congress passed the National Maximum Speed Law, and threatened to cut funding to any state that didn't comply with the new 55 mph maximum speed limit. Theoretically, forcing everyone to drive slower increases fuel economy, and the oil embargo had people stressed. But did the lower speed limit work? Did we save gas?

From Autopia:

The U.S. Department of Energy says gas mileage plummets above 60 mph and says every 5 mph above that speed is akin to paying an additional $0.20 per gallon for gas. But the American Heritage Foundation claims 12 years of 55 mph speed limits cut fuel consumption by just 1 percent. After Congress repealed the National Maximum Speed Law and 33 states raised their speed limits, the Cato Institute said traffic deaths dropped to a record low.

More than fuel economy and traffic deaths are at stake now. "Emissions increase pretty appreciably above 55," McNaull says. drive55.org claims Washington state would cut CO2 emissions by 10 percent if it cut its 70 mph speed limit by 15 mph. But even here, the evidence is debated. The Automobile Association in England claims reducing the speed limit from 30 mph to 20 on residential roads would increase CO2 emission by more than 10%.

What do you think? Should we bring back the national speed limit?

With Gas Prices Rising And The Planet Warming, Is It Time To Drive 55 Again? [Wired]

]]>
Consumerist-5010370 Thu, 22 May 2008 10:53:06 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5010370&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 6 Gas Saving Myths... Debunked ]]> CNNMoney has compiled a list of gas saving myths and asked Consumer Reports and Edmunds.com to debunk them. Here's the list:

#1. Fill your tank in the morning

Consumer Reports says that the temperature variation in a single day isn't really significant enough to affect the gas, so you might as well stay in bed.

#2. Change your air filter

"Modern engines have computer sensors that automatically adjust the fuel-air mixture as an increasingly clogged air filter chokes off the engine's air supply."

#3. Use premium fuel

"When sensors detect regular instead of premium fuel, the system automatically adjusts spark plug timing. The result is a slight reduction in peak horsepower - really, you'll never notice - but no reduction in fuel economy."

#4 Pump up your tires

"According to on-the-road driving tests by both Consumer Reports and auto information site Edmunds.com, underinflated tires reduce fuel economy, so proper inflation is key.

But you should never over-inflate your tires."

#5 To AC or Not To AC
At most speeds and in most vehicles, A/C use drains slightly more fuel than driving with the windows down, contends David Champion, head of auto testing for Consumer Reports. "My final take on is that it's very close," says Phil Reed, consumer advice editor for Edmunds.com. "It's hard to measure the difference and every vehicle is different."

#6. Bolt-ons and pour-ins

"... if there really was an additive that made gas burn up more slowly, it wouldn't be sold over the Internet one bottle at a time."

There's more detailed info at CNNMoney, but as far we're concerned, the best way to increase your fuel economy is to slow down, stop running up on people's ass and then slamming on the brakes, and don't weave from lane to lane trying to find the fast one. They're all slow. Such is life. Relax.

6 gas saving myths [CNNMoney] (Thanks, Aaron!)

(Photo: meghannmarco )

]]>
Consumerist-5009142 Thu, 15 May 2008 09:48:51 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5009142&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Nissan Altima Takes Two Top Spots In Consumer Reports' Sedan Showdown ]]> We approve! Because of a drop of nearly 10% in fuel economy in this year's Honda Accord over the previous one, it lost its title as a "Top Pick" for midpriced family sedans in the Consumer Reports Auto Issue this year. The new winner is the Nissan Altima 3.5 SE (V6), which was reviewed by the magazine nearly a year ago. Both the Altima and the previous Accord got 23 mpg, while the new, 2nd-place 2008 V6 Accord gets only 21 mpg.

Not that the Accord is a bad buy—other than fuel economy, the new Accord "easily outperformed all the other vehicles in this test group—and achieved an "Excellent" overall road test score." (We don't know if they're including last year's Altima test as part of the group.)

The Altima also came out on top in the budget-priced category:

The four-cylinder Altima also claimed the top spot in CR's ranking of 15 Affordable Family sedans, with a much wider, six-point margin over the Accord [four-cylinder LX-P]. The Kia Optima EX and Toyota Camry LE are ranked third and fourth in that category.

"Nissan Altima Inches Past Honda Accord to Become Consumer Reports' Top-Ranked, Midpriced..." [Reuters] (press release)
(Kitten approval team photo by abcrumley)

]]>
Consumerist-342572 Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:55:40 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=342572&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Congress approved a bill mandating car makers ... ]]> Congress approved a bill mandating car makers improve fuel economy from 25 MPG to 35 MPG by 2020. Hopefully there will still be a planet left to drive on by that time. [Chicago Tribune]

]]>
Consumerist-335481 Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:57:13 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=335481&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Bush Fuel Economy Plan Rejected By The Courts ]]> The Bush administrations fuel economy plan was rejected by 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Thursday. The court ruled that National Highway Traffic Safety Administration "failed to address why the so-called light trucks are allowed to pollute more than passenger cars and didn't properly assess greenhouse gas emissions when it set new minimum miles-per-gallon requirements for models in 2008 to 2011," according to the Associated Press.


The court ordered the White House to examine why it continues to consider light trucks differently than cars. Regulators made a distinction between cars and light trucks decades ago when most trucks were used for commercial purposes.

NHTSA had argued that it considered the intent of the manufacturer in making light trucks, rather than their actual highway use, in developing the new fuel standards.

"But this overlooks the fact that many light trucks today are manufactured primarily for transporting passengers," Fletcher wrote for the three-judge panel.

Fletcher also wrote that the administration failed to consider the benefit to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

"It did, however, include an analysis of the employment and sales impacts of more stringent standards on manufacturers," Fletcher wrote.

The court also took the administration to task for refusing to include in the new standards trucks weighing more than 8,500 pounds, a class that includes the Hummer H2, Ford F250 and other popular large vehicles.

The court ordered NHTSA to develop fuel standards for these large trucks or give a better reason than the agency's argument that it has never regulated those large trucks and that more testing needs to be done.

"This historic ruling vindicates our fight against fuel economy standards that are a complete sham and a gift to the auto industry," said Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who also joined the lawsuit.

Oh no, someone has irritated Richard Blumenthal. Now their destruction is assured.

Court Rebukes Bush Fuel Economy Plan [AP]
(Photo:George E. Norkus)

]]>
Consumerist-323949 Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:34:11 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=323949&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Top 10 Most Fuel Efficient Cars ]]> Here's the top 10 most fuel efficient cars, according to the 2008 Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Energy's fuel economy guidebook, published this Saturday. Prius tops the charts.

2008 Model Year Overall Fuel Economy Leaders

Class Model City/Highway MPG

10. Honda Fit (manual) 28/34
9. Toyota Corolla (manual) 28/37
8. Ford Escape Hybrid 4WD 29/27, Mercury Mariner Hybrid 4WD ", Mazda Tribute Hybrid 4WD "
7. Toyota Yaris (automatic) 29/35
6. Toyota Yaris (manual) 29/36
5. Toyota Camry Hybrid 33/34
4. Ford Escape Hybrid FWD 34/30, MazdaTribute Hybrid 2WD ", Mercury Mariner Hybrid FWD "
3. Nissan Altima Hybrid 35/33
2. Honda Civic Hybrid 40/45
1. Toyota Prius (hybrid-electric) 48/45

If you want to save on gas, hybrids are the way to go.

Lowest Fuel Economy by Vehicle Class for 2008 Model Year

Class Model City/Highway MPG

Two Seater Lamborghini Murcielago (manual) 8/13
Minicompact Car Aston Martin DB9 Coupe, Volante (manual) 10/16
Subcompact Car Bentley Continental GTC 10/17
Compact Car Bentley Azure 9/15
Midsize Car Ferrari 612 Scaglietti (auto) 9/16
Large Car Bentley Arnage RL 9/15
Small Station Wagon Audi S4 Avant (manual) 13/20
Midsize Station Wagon Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG Wagon 12/18
Sport Utility Vehicle* Mercedes-Benz G55 AMG 11/13
Minivan* Toyota Sienna 4WD 16/21
Pickup Truck* Rousch Performance Stage3 F150 11/15
Van (Passenger and
Cargo)*
Passenger Chevrolet G1500/2500 EXPRESS 2WD 12/16
" Chevrolet H1500 EXPRESS AWD "
" GMC G1500/2500 SAVANA 2WD "
" GMC H1500 SAVANA VAN AWD "
Cargo Chevrolet G15/25 VAN CONV 2WD "
" Chevrolet H1500 VAN CONV AWD "
" GMC G15/25 SAVANA 2WD CONV "
" GMC H1500 SAVANA AWD CONV "

*Trucks over 8500 pounds gross vehicle weight rating are currently exempt from federal fuel economy requirements

Highest Fuel Economy Models by Vehicle Class for 2008 Model Year

Class Model City/Highway MPG

Two Seater Audi TT Roadster (2 liter engine,auto) 22/29
Minicompact Car Mini Cooper Convertible (manual) 23/32
Subcompact Car Toyota Yaris (manual) 29/36
Compact Car Honda Civic Hybrid 40/45
Midsize Car Toyota Prius (hybrid) 48/45
Large Car Honda Accord 4Dr Sedan (manual) 22/31
Small Station Wagon Honda Fit (manual) 28/34
Midsize Station Wagon Passat Wagon (manual) 21/29
Sport Utility Vehicle Ford Escape Hybrid FWD 34/30
Mazda Tribute Hybrid 2WD "
Mercury Mariner Hybrid FWD "
Minivan Dodge Caravan 2WD 17/24
Chrysler Town & Country 2WD "
Pickup Truck Ford Ranger Pickup 2WD (manual) 21/26
Mazda B2300 2WD (manual) "
Van (Cargo&Passenger)Chevrolet G1500/2500 Van 2WD 15/20
(4.3 liter engine)
GMC G1500/2500 Savana 2WD Cargo "
(4.3 liter engine)

Lowest Overall Fuel Economy Models* for 2008 Model Year

Rank Manufacturer/Model City/Highway MPG

1. Lamborghini Murcielago (automatic) 8/13
2. Bugati Veyron 8/14
3. Lamborghini Murcielago (manual) 9/14
4. Bently Azure/Arnage RL 9/15
5. Ferrari 612 Scaglietti (automatic) 9/16
6. Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder (manual) 10/15
Ferrari Ferrari 612 Scaglietti (manual) "
Bentley Arnage (auttomatic) "
7. Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder 10/16
Aston Martin DB9 Coupe "
Aston Martin DB9 Volante "
Mercedes-Benz Maybach 57 "
Mercedes-Benz Maybach 57S "
Mercedes-Benz Maybach 62 "
Mercedes-Benz Maybach 62S "
8. Lamborghini Gallardo Coupe (manual) 10/17
Bentley Continental GT (automatic) "
Bentley Continental GTC (automatic) "
Bentley Continental Flying Spur (automatic) "
9. Mercedes-Benz G55 AMG 11/13
10. Jeep Grand Cherokee 4WD 11/14
Mercedes-Benz Ml63 AMG "

EPA, DOE Release Fuel Economy Lists for 2008 Vehicle Models [AutoSpectator]
2008 Fuel Economy Guide (PDF) [Fueleconomy.gov]

(Photo: hanapbuhay)

]]>
Consumerist-311974 Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:53:21 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=311974&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Will More Fuel Efficient Cars Lead To Cheaper Beer? ]]> Gas guzzlers don't just spew more carbon into the air, they apparently affect the price of a cold, frosty brew:

Heineken CEO Jean-Fran ois van Boxmeer pointed out on Wednesday that the increasing demand for grain for biofuel will put pressure on the price of grain, and by extension on malt and hop prices as well, two important raw materials.

We're assuming he means that ethanol production is to blame for the spike in grain prices. (Corn is at a 10-year high today.)

But something seems fishy here. Beer — at least good beer — is made from barley, and we've never heard of barley being distilled into fuel additives. We have heard of wine being distilled into ethanol, which just seems so, so wrong... Corn remains the fuel crop of choice.

And why would the price of hops go up because of "biofuels"? Hops can't be converted into fuel at all.

Sounds to us like Heineken is just looking for an excuse to jack up prices.
MARK ASHLEY

Cleaner fuel, dearer beer? [Expatica]
(Photo)

]]>
Consumerist-238923 Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:04:19 EST consumerintern http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=238923&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ New EPA Fuel Economy Stickers To Use More Realistic Estimates ]]> Starting with the 2008 line, new cars will feature an improved fuel economy sticker with better estimates of gas usage. The stickers will show an increased range of expected mpg, depending on how one drives.

Consumer advocacy groups complained the sticker's mpg ratings were too generous in years past. A test not updated from the 1970's, when the national highway speed limit was 55, stop and go traffic was lower, and horsepower was 89 percent lower, was to blame for consumer's never achieving the posted MPG. — BEN POPKEN

New EPA fuel-economy tests will better reflect real-world driving [ConsumerReports]

]]>
Consumerist-233891 Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:36:54 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=233891&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The News; Wal-Mart Hires Flying Nun ]]> flyingnun.jpg• The creative team was crushed to learn Mother Theresa wasn't available. [LAT] "Wal-Mart Puts Its Faith in Ex-Nun to Convert Critics"
• Keep those tips up, Barbie! [NYT] "Mattel Reports a Profit"
• Almost all the news that's fit to print. [NYT] "Times to Reduce Page Size and Close a Plant in 2008"
• A butterfly coughs in Arabia. [CT] "Wake-Up Call to U.S. on Oil?"
• The breathtaking views available while on the osteoporosis drug Evista include fatal strokes and blood clots. [LAT] "Lilly Drug Shown to Raise Blood-Clot Risk"
• Gas efficiency party like it's 1994. [LAT] "'Fuel Economy Unchanged From Decade Ago"
• Mr. Hooters is dead at 69, huh huh. [NYT] "Robert H. Brooks, 69, Owner of Hooters Restaurant Chain, Is Dead"

]]>
Consumerist-187990 Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:50:29 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=187990&view=rss&microfeed=true