<![CDATA[Consumerist: Danger]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Danger]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/danger http://consumerist.com/tag/danger <![CDATA[ Crocs + Escalator = Yet Another Mangled Foot ]]> Another small child's foot has been mangled by the combination of the especially-grippy Crocs clogs and a moving escalator, according to WSBTV:

"There's no reason this should have happened to my daughter," said Alison Pregliasco, Lexi's mother. "She was holding onto the rail...I heard her screaming and tried to pull her foot out and it wouldn't come out and the escalator just kept going down. And, I just started screaming at the top of my lungs, 'Somebody stop this thing, somebody stop this thing. We have to make it stop.'"

Pregliasco said it took 15 minutes to get her daughter's right foot out of the escalator. EMTs took the child to the hospital, where doctors put pins in her foot and performed surgery to clean bones and remove contaminated skin.

"Three broken toes, two pretty severely broken, the other is just a hairline fracture," said Pregliasco. "The toe was severed down to the bone and they called it a 'dirty wound' because they had escalator grease in there."

Crocs is currently being sued over a similar incident. The company responded to that lawsuit by saying that they "take escalator safety seriously."

The CPSC recently issued a warning about "some shoes" causing more risk of entrapment on escalators than others, but were careful not to specify which brand of shoes they were talking about.

CPSC is aware of 77 entrapment incidents since January 2006, with about half resulting in injury. All but two of the incidents involved popular soft-sided flexible clogs and slides.


Girl, 3, Injured On Airport Escalator
[WSBTV](Thanks, Ryan!)

]]>
Consumerist-5014022 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:13:33 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5014022&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Watch Out! Exploding Bleach Recalled! ]]> kapow.jpgHere's a weird recall that you might care to know about: Fred Meyer and QFC supermarkets have recalled bottles of bleach that could potentially explode when opened, says the Seattle Times.

Everyday Living Bleach, sold exclusively by Fred Meyer and QFC, should not be returned to the store.

From Fred Meyer:

The Everyday Living Bleach involved in the recall was on the shelves beginning January 17. It includes 96 oz. bottles of the regular, citrus and mountain blend bleaches as well as 128 oz. bottles of the regular bleach.
If you purchased the product, you should put the bleach in a garbage bag, and place it in a second bag if the container looks bulged.

Please don't attempt to take this item back to a store. Instead, move the item to an area where it won't cause damage and contact the manufacturer, KIK Customer Product, at 800-479-6603 ext. 656.

Please be ready to provide the UPC number, description, size and sell-by date on the bottle.

Arrangements will be made for the manufacturer to come and pick up the bagged bleach.

If the UPC number or the sell-by date cannot be viewed without touching the bottle, but was purchased after January 17, simply bag the product and call the manufacturer.

Yikes.

Fred Meyer, QFC recall bleach with potential to explode [Seattle Times]
PRODUCT RECALL: Everyday Living Bleach [Fred Meyer]
(Photo:Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-363162 Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:35:23 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=363162&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ In response to consumer backlash, Verizon ... ]]> In response to consumer backlash, Verizon has decided to make it so alarms on its new phones don't go off on its phones when you dial 911. This is so if you hide and call 911 when a prowler breaks in, you don't give them a handy homing signal. [KOMO]

]]>
Consumerist-358035 Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:39:08 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358035&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ No More Loose Non-Rechargable Lithium Batteries In Checked Luggage ]]> lithium.jpgThe TSA has announced a ban on loose non-rechargeable lithium batteries in checked luggage, because they've realized that "fire-protection systems in the cargo hold of passenger planes can't put out fires sparked in lithium batteries."

Well, that's not good.

From the AP:

Passengers can still check baggage with lithium batteries if they are installed in electronic devices, such as cameras, cell phones and laptop computers. If packed in plastic bags, batteries may be in carryon baggage. The limit is two batteries per passenger.

Baggage Ban on Batteries Begins [AP]

]]>
Consumerist-338900 Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:58:35 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338900&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Illinois AG (Still) Wants Ban On Magnets In Children's Products ]]> deathbarbie.jpgIllinois AG Lisa Madigan is tired of children dying after ingesting improperly secured magnets in children's products, so she's suggesting a ban, according to the Chicago Tribune:
Illinois Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan sent a second letter Friday to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission urging a law banning magnets in children's toys.

The letters follow the Tribune series "Hidden Hazards," which revealed how the understaffed and sluggish commission fails to protect children from dangers in toys and other products.

Earlier this year, the Tribune reported the agency's botched recall of Magnetix Magnetic Building Sets and the death of a child who swallowed magnets that fell out of the toys. This week, the Tribune reported on the dangers posed by loose magnets in children's jewelry.

Magnet deaths are pretty horrific. Ingesting two or more magnets causes them to attract within the digestive system, resulting in tearing of the stomach and intestines. The best case scenario is emergency surgery, but at least one child has died after ingesting magnets that fell out of a toy.

Millions of toys have been recalled this year due to design flaws in which toys can break and release dangerous magnets.

Attorney general again urges ban on toy magnets [Chicago Tribune]

]]>
Consumerist-337192 Mon, 24 Dec 2007 09:48:05 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=337192&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dialing 911 Could Be Dangerous ]]> Dialing 911 sets off a loud alarm on newer Verizon phones, potentially putting customers in danger. Imagine dashing under your bed at the sound of an intruder breaking through the front door, only to wonder if you should call 911 from your cellphone because it would reveal your location. A Texas woman was forced to make a similar decision when she discovered that the security chain guarding her vacant property was missing.

She grabbed her new Casio G'zOne phone from Verizon Wireless, which to her horror made an audible alarm when she called 911.

Fearing vandals were still on the property, she hung up and hid, then put her hand over the earpiece and dialed again to muffle the sounds.

"I was afraid the criminals were down the driveway and they would hear and they would know somebody was doing something and they would come out to stop me," she said.

Verizon believes that the alarm is required by federal law.
"The tone our customer experienced is our interpretation of Section 255 of the Telecommunications Act calling for a provider of telecommunications service to offer service that is accessible and usable by individuals with disabilities."
That would be nice, except an FCC spokesman called bullshit:
"The Commission has not implemented any rules pursuant to Section 255 that would require the use of any tones concerning 911 calls."
Verizon should rollback their misguided extension of "Can You Hear Me Now?" to criminals. Dialing 911 should never put you in danger.

Verizon customer calls phone alarm 'dangerous' [KVUE News]
(Photo: mellomango)

]]>
Consumerist-326138 Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:02:40 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=326138&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Recalled Simplicity Crib Owners: Your Repair Kits Are Ready ]]> newtrack.jpgIf you have one of the Simplicity cribs that was recalled due to a design flaw that made it easy to assemble incorrectly and dangerous to use, your repair kits are ready.

The Simplicity crib models with recalled hardware include: Aspen 3 in 1, Aspen 4 in 1, Nursery-in-a-Box, Crib N Changer Combo, Chelsea and Pooh 4 in 1. The recall also involves the following Simplicity cribs that used the Graco logo: Aspen 3 in 1, Ultra 3 in 1, Ultra 4 in 1, Ultra 5 in 1, Whitney and the Trio.

When assembled incorrectly the cribs had a dangerous gap that could (and did) cause suffocation and death.

If you feel that the condition of your crib will not be helped by a repair kit, call Simplicity at (800) 858-8323.

Repair Kits Ready To Be Sent To Parents and Caregivers With Recalled Simplicity Cribs [CPSC]

PREVIOUSLY: Did The Chicago Tribune Embarrass The CPSC Into Recalling A Million Cribs?

]]>
Consumerist-315845 Sat, 27 Oct 2007 03:11:58 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=315845&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Only The Second Time One Has Exploded" ]]>

FRAMINGHAM A Framingham couple hasn't been able to use their bathroom lately - because their new blue glass sink exploded. It reportedly blew up over the weekend and no one seems to know why...The president of the company that sold the sink to Stoll, Renovator's Supply of Millers Falls, told the paper they've sold thousands of glass sinks in the last three years and this is only the second time one has exploded.
Don't know about you but one exploding glass sink is one too many, and now it's two too many. The company is said to have offered the Stolls a refund or replacement. That's nice. Good thing in neither case anyone was WASHING THEIR FACE AT THE TIME. If that happens, will Renovator's Supply of Millers Falls replace or refund your forehead?

Glass Sink Explodes In Framingham Home [WBZ] (Thanks to Jennifer!)

]]>
Consumerist-290361 Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:01:48 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=290361&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Consumer Reports Advises Families With Small Children To Avoid Magnet Toys ]]> batman.jpgConsumer Reports is advising families with small children to stay away from magnet toys and products for adults that have small, strong magnets.

Why?

Because babies don't understand that eating a bunch of magnets will cause them to die, and it's really hard to explain it to them. It's probably easier to just not buy them.

From Consumer Reports:


Given the ongoing problems with these toys, and the potential for serious injury or death, we continue to recommend that parents avoid all magnetic toys if there are young children in their home. We also recommend caution when purchasing products made for adults that may contain strong magnets (such as those used on some bulletin boards). Many of these are small and colorful and could easily be swallowed by children.
Magnets can be, and have been, fatal to children who swallowed more than one. The magnets attract inside the body, and well, it's just not pretty.

So if you do have very small children who are not yet at an age where they know what not to put in their mouths, you might want to stay away from magnets.

Latest toy recall raises additional concern over magnets [Consumer Reports]

]]>
Consumerist-290287 Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:59:31 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=290287&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ You People Can't Be Trusted With Nailguns ]]> Due (presumably) to a ready supply of inexpensive nailguns and hunky DIY hosts on TLC to demonstrate their use, nailgun injuries in the US have skyrocketed 200% since 1991. From CNN:

"During the 5-year period 2001-2005, an average of approximately 37,000 patients with injuries related to nail-gun use were treated annually in emergency departments, with 40 percent of injuries occurring among consumers," the report read.

Emergency departments treated three times as many consumers with nail-gun injuries in 2005 as they did in 1991, the report noted.

Lest you worry that craftspeople are becoming incompetent, you should know that work-related nailgun injuries have not increased.—MEGHANN MARCO

Nailguns taking out weekend warriors [CNN]
(Photo: Velo Steve)

]]>
Consumerist-252261 Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:37:45 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=252261&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Colorado Police Looking For Comcast Imposter ]]> Colorado police are looking for man caught posing as a Comcast employee. The man had no identification and was holding photocopied Comcast brochures as he tried to gain entrance to a home.

From ABC 7 Denver:

A man claiming to be with Comcast stood on the doorsteps of a house in Pepperwood Lane last Wednesday night and told the resident that he was coming to pick up a cable box, authorities said.

The resident told the man that he had problems with his cable before but it had been restored. The resident was suspicious not only because it was 9 p.m., but also because the man had no identification that said he was with Comcast, was not wearing a uniform and was driving a car that didn't have any Comcast logos on it.

The suspicious man was carrying brochures with the name Comcast on it but they appeared to be photo copies, the resident said. The resident told authorities that the impersonator got nervous when the dogs started barking and he jumped in his car and fled.

Obviously, this guy wasn't very savvy, but it just goes to show that you should ask questions of anyone who attempts to come into your home. Never let anyone in unless you have an appointment and they show proper ID. You should also never be alone when you schedule work to be done in your home. Bad guys have been known to follow real Comcast trucks and pretend to be a supervisor checking up on the real employee's work. —MEGHANN MARCO

Deputies Look For Cable Guy Impersonator [abc 7 Denver]
(Photo:mmarchin)

]]>
Consumerist-243898 Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:55:47 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=243898&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Consumer Reports: Um, About Those Car Seats... ]]> It looks like Consumer Reports messed up the side-impact crash tests they conducted on several brands of children's carseats. From CNN:

Consumer Reports received information from NHTSA raising questions about the test.

"Our initial review of the Consumer Reports testing procedures showed a significant error in the manner in which it conducted and reported on its side-impact tests," said NHTSA Administrator Nicole Nason in a statement posted on the agency's Web site.

"The organization's data show its side-impact tests were actually conducted under conditions that would represent being struck in excess of 70 mph, twice as fast as the group claimed," said Nason.

Consumer Reports has recalled the report and is redoing the tests. They ask that you reserve judgment on individual brands until the new tests are complete. They still, however, stand by their opinion that the Evenflo Discovery should be recalled, "because it didn't meet federal frontal crash test standards," as well as the Eddie Bauer Comfort "because it couldn't be installed properly." —MEGHANN MARCO

Consumer Reports recalls car seat study [CNN]

PREVIOUSLY: Most Car Seats "Fail Disastrously" In Crash Tests

]]>
Consumerist-229816 Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:06:40 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=229816&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sabotage! AT&T Claims Time-Warner is Cutting Their Cables ]]> robot.jpg"AT&T filed a lawsuit Dec. 8 in a district court in Bexar County, Texas, against Time Warner Cable's San Antonio division, alleging that the cable operator engaged in "a methodical invasion of facilities owned, operated and controlled by AT&T Texas" while installing voice service at apartments and other multiple-dwelling units in and around the city. In its lawsuit against Time Warner Cable in San Antonio, AT&T alleges that: "Cable technicians trespassed on AT&T facilities and cut or disconnected wires in network interface devices."

Oh you diabolical bastards! Does Time Warner deny this alleged chicanery? Oh, not at all. "Time Warner Cable "acknowledged" the practice and "assured" AT&T it would take steps to discontinue the wire cuts." God, AT&T, you just had to ask them to stop cutting your cables, you didn't need to get all litigious about it. Get a sense of humor, already! —MEGHANN MARCO

AT&T Claims Sabotage by Cabler[Broadcast Newsroom]

]]>
Consumerist-222931 Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:15:02 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=222931&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The U.S. Census: Beds Are Like, Totally Dangerous or Something ]]> The New York Times has an article today about the U.S. Census 2007 Statistical Abstract of the United States. Big news: We drink a lot of bottle water. More than beer, if you can believe that. The most dangerous consumer item is a bicycle, the second is a bed. Yes, "Bicycles are involved in more accidents than any other consumer product, but beds rank a close second."

In case you were wondering, the Times tells us that this is because nearly everyone uses a bed and fewer people use bicycles. But you knew that. — MEGHANN MARCO(Thanks, Morgen!)

Who Americans Are and What They Do, in Census Data [New York Times]

]]>
Consumerist-222204 Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:12:04 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=222204&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 10 Worst Toys of 2006 ]]> The W.A.T.C.H. List of the 10 worst toys of 2006 is out! This list claims to feature toys that have the potential to "cause childhood injuries, or even death." What evil toys made the list this year? The insanely popular skate shoe "Heelys" come with the following warning, "There is no way to heel and/or grind without running the risk of SERIOUS BODILY HARM, including head injury, spinal injury, or even death" Death! Jeepers.

Also included is the Fisher Price "Lil Snoopy", A Superman Lamp, and Fear Factor Candy Challenge (Yes, a candy eating contest for children. Best idea ever.) Check out the rest of the terrifying list!—MEGHANN MARCO

W.A.T.C.H. Worst Toys of 2006 [W.A.T.C.H. via BoingBoing]

]]>
Consumerist-217569 Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:12:18 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=217569&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ HOWTO: Report Dangerous Products ]]> cpsclogo.jpgStrangling crib slats, exploding chairs, and that whole various easily swallowed pieces crowd... why should everyone else get all the fun?

If you have a product mess up on you in a potentially dangerous way, be sure to let the Consumer Product Safety commission know. Here's their digits:

Consumer Product Safety Commission
Washington, DC 20207
Toll free: 1-800-638-CPSC
TDD toll free: 1-800-638-8270
Fax: 301-504-0051
email: info@cpsc.gov
www.cpsc.gov

And when you see that melting window recall on local TV, it's okay to feel that glimmer of pride massage your chest.

]]>
Consumerist-206609 Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:57:10 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=206609&view=rss&microfeed=true