<![CDATA[Consumerist: cost of living]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: cost of living]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/cost of living http://consumerist.com/tag/cost of living <![CDATA[ This Dollar Store Taunts You With The Past ]]> Can there be any sadder indication of our toilet-water economy than a dollar store that references its own happier, cheaper past? This New York City dollar store has pulled down its old sign, "Everything 99¢ Or Less," and rebranded.

Sometimes truth in advertising hurts, especially when you can still see the outline of the former sign above the new one.

Update: The new sign may have actually gone up a while back, in which case it's more an illustration of NYC's high cost of living than current inflation. Even if that's the case, you'd think they'd do something about the remnants of that old sign taunting everyone.

Update #2: Another reader, David, sent us a picture he took last summer of the same store. It appears "99¢ Dreams" is in a constant state of naming flux:

We sort of like "OR LESS OR MORE" as a slogan—makes it seem more like a carnival game, somehow.

(Thanks to Larry!)

]]>
Consumerist-5043187 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:04:22 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5043187&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Get Ready For More Supermarket Price Hikes ]]> The notorious Grocery Shrink Ray was supposed to help prevent this, or so we were told by apologists for it, but Datamonitor is reporting that Kraft Foods, Kellogg's, ConAgra, Sara Lee, and Tyson "are all expected to announce a hike in the prices of their products" in the near future. Here are some of the hikes you can expect, according to the Chicago Sun-Times.

  • Cereal makers General Mills and Kellogg Co. have both said they will raise prices. General Mills "said it needed to make up for cost increases that it expects will total 9 percent."
  • Kraft Foods, whose brands include Oscar Mayer, Philadelphia cream cheese, Oreos and Wheat Thins, will follow its 8% price increase earlier this year with another one to offset rising commodity costs.
  • Sara Lee will raise prices 20% for its meat products like Jimmy Dean sausages and Ball Park Franks. Sara Lee's COO gave this mangled explanation to Datamonitor: "Price increases vary a lot by type of products but the increases will be as low as zero and some products we will decrease on and other increases (will be) in excess of 20%."

The Chicago Sun-Times advises,

Overall grocery prices are expected to rise 5 percent to 6 percent this year. But some categories are projected to post higher increases, such as eggs, fats and oils and cereals.

A report by the Food Institute, a research group for manufacturers, predicted 2008 increases of at least 9 percent for those products.

"Grocery bills going up — again" [Chicago Sun-Times]
"US food firms to increase prices again" [Datamonitor] (subscription only)
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-5028085 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:15:44 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028085&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ TV stations looking to save money can do ... ]]> TV stations looking to save money can do so by interviewing guests remotely over Skype, as WTVT in Tampa did, live, with me this morning. No more paying for car service or bottled water!

]]>
Consumerist-5024933 Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:38:21 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5024933&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Consumers are responding to higher priced ... ]]> Consumers are responding to higher priced goods buy buying more private label items, says a Citibank analyst. The increase in market share is small—private labels occupy less than 12%—but significant enough to note for investors. Are you buying more private labels at the grocery store? [Reuters]

]]>
Consumerist-5014438 Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:15:36 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5014438&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Food Companies Threaten Higher Prices If FDA Increases Safety Oversight ]]> Last week, the Grocery Manufacturers Association told lawmakers that if the FDA doubled its safety oversight budget by increasing fees from food companies, they'd have to raise prices to make up the cost. That's right: affordable food or safe food. Choose one!

"Inevitably there would be an increase in the cost of the products that is passed on to the consumer," Cal Dooley, the group's president and a former Democratic lawmaker, told a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee. "You are further compounding the rapid increase in food prices, the likes of which we haven't seen in recent years."
The chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, Rep. John D. Dingell (D., Mich.), responded that better oversight would translate into lower legal fees because it would reduce lawsuits, but we have a feeling the food companies would pass the cost directly to the supermarket shelves and take a wait-and-see (and then profit from) approach to future legal bills.
With the legislative changes, "you would get safe food from places like China, where they sell all manner of crap," Dingell told Dooley.
 
Under the proposal, food producers would have to pay annual registration fees of $2,000 per facility, generating $600 million for FDA food-safety activities, more than doubling the current budget. The FDA would be required to conduct inspections every two years of both domestic and foreign makers of drugs and medical devices.

"Food firms testify fee would hurt" [Philly.com]
(Photo: Getty)
]]>
Consumerist-384667 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:20:40 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=384667&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Shipping Is Getting Expensive ]]> con_theweakusdollar.jpgEmily noticed that the weird puppet crap she was thinking of buying on Ebay would make her PayPal account explode:
I know shipping products can be expensive, what with the rising fuel costs and all, but this shipping charge from the UK to Utah is ridiculous! Maybe the seller's just padding the fee, I don't know. :)

con_shippingfromuk_giantsize.jpg

]]>
Consumerist-376706 Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:59:42 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376706&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The 12 Days Of Christmas Will Cost You $19,507 This Year ]]> Every year since 1984 PNC has been calculating the cost of the items mentioned in the 12 days of Christmas, resulting in a pointless, but highly amusing version of the Consumer Price Index.

This year the purchase price of the 12 items has jumped 3% to $19,507. PNC also calculates what they call the "True Cost of Christmas" which includes all the items purchased by a True Love who repeats all the song's verses. This year's "True Cost" is $78,100 (for all 364 items.)

2007's price increase came from a minimum wage increase for the "Maids-A-Milking," increased gold prices, and higher demand for food items such as the "Geese-A-Laying."

"For True Loves planning to serve a Christmas goose - or six - for a holiday meal, this item will be a bit more expensive," said James Dunigan, managing executive of investments for PNC Wealth Management. "Food prices have increased over the last year, which has not impacted birds like Turtle Doves and Partridges, but has had an impact on birds traditionally served as food, like Geese."


PNC Christmas Price Index
23rd Annual PNC Christmas Price Index UP 3.1 % [PNC]

]]>
Consumerist-326399 Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:14:24 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=326399&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ A Family Of 4 Needs To Make $77,069 A Year To Get By In San Francisco? ]]> According to a new study cited by the San Francisco Chronicle, a family of 4 needs to make $77,069 in order to "get by" in San Francisco.

From SFGate:

A family of four in the Bay Area with two working adults must earn $77,069, equaling an hourly wage of $18.53, just to pay for basic necessities, a study released today calculates. If only one adult works, that figure falls to $53,075, largely because the family doesn't have to pay for child care, according to the report by the California Budget Project, a liberal Sacramento research group. But that one wage-earner must make $25.52 an hour.

And a single parent with two children needs to take in $65,864 annually, at an hourly wage of $31.67, to cover expenses, the Budget Project figures.

Statewide, the two-working-parent family needs an annual income of $72,343 to cover necessities; the family with one working adult must earn $50,383.
...
They estimated prices of housing, child care, transportation, food, health care, taxes and miscellaneous, a category that lumps together everything else. They looked at rental costs rather than home ownership and made certain other assumptions that have big effects on living standards.

For example, they included as a necessity individually purchased health insurance, although many families are covered at least partly through work. And, in an effort to figure what it takes to support a family without public assistance, they didn't consider the help many families get from government benefits such as housing and child health care subsidies.

According to those assumptions, the biggest expense was rent, estimated at an average of $1,312 for a family of four in the Bay Area, higher than the statewide estimate of $1,160. Child care was the second biggest outlay at about $1,216, followed by taxes and health coverage.

It sounds like more of a "worst case scenario" than "everyone with 2 kids absolutely needs this much money," but even so it's interesting. We suppose the title of this post could also be, "San Francisco Laughs At Your Measly $77k."

Hey Bay Area readers, do these estimates sound correct to you?

A Bay Area couple with two kids can't make it on $50,000 a year [SF Gate]
(Photo:Maulliegh)

]]>
Consumerist-312017 Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:43:14 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312017&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Huggies Diapers, Scott Toilet Paper, Will Soon Be More Expensive ]]> Consumer goods manufacturer Kimberly-Clark announced today that it was raising prices on a variety of products from Huggies diapers to Scott and Cottonelle bathroom tissue.

Kimberly-Clark said that higher raw materials costs as well as increased energy bills are the reason for the price increase.

Prices for Cottonelle and Scott bathroom tissue, Viva and Scott paper towels, Huggies diapers, Pull-Ups training pants, Goodnites youth pants and Huggies Little Swimmers swimpants will increase between 4 and 7 percent effective February 3, 2008.

Kimberly-Clark Announces Price Increases for U.S. Consumer Products Businesses [PR Newswire]
(Photo:Hannahs Mum)

]]>
Consumerist-308819 Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:11:00 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=308819&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Basic Costs Have Increased Dramatically In The Last Decade ]]> The Center for American Progress has a article explaining how costs have risen since the last minimum wage increase. According to their numbers, "dinner" has gone up 39.72%, electricity is up 25.02%, and gasoline up 135.20%.

The article may concentrate on those making minimum wage, but these costs have risen for all of us. Yuck!

Life at Minimum Wage [Center For American Progress]

]]>
Consumerist-284347 Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:44:49 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=284347&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Minimum Wage Rates Across The Country ]]> states.jpgWith all this talk about the new minimum wage we thought we'd take a look at the state minimum wage rates from across the country.



    ALABAMA none
    ALASKA $7.15
    ARIZONA $6.75
    ARKANSAS $6.25
    CALIFORNIA $7.50
    COLORADO $6.85
    CONNECTICUT $7.65
    DELAWARE $6.65
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA $7.00
    FLORIDA $6.67
    GEORGIA $5.15
    HAWAII $7.25
    IDAHO $5.85
    ILLINOIS $7.50
    INDIANA $5.85
    IOWA $6.20
    KANSAS $2.65
    KENTUCKY $5.85
    LOUISIANA none
    MAINE $6.75
    MARYLAND $6.15
    MASSACHUSETTS $7.50
    MICHIGAN $7.15
    MINNESOTA $6.15
    MISSISSIPPI none
    MISSOURI $6.50
    MONTANA $6.15
    NEBRASKA $5.85
    NEVADA $6.33
    NEW HAMPSHIRE $5.85
    NEW JERSEY $7.15
    NEW MEXICO $5.15
    NEW YORK $7.15
    NORTH CAROLINA $6.15
    NORTH DAKOTA $5.85
    OHIO $6.85
    OKLAHOMA $5.85
    OREGON $7.80
    PENNSYLVANIA $6.25
    RHODE ISLAND $7.40
    SOUTH CAROLINA none
    SOUTH DAKOTA $5.85
    TENNESSEE none
    TEXAS $5.85
    UTAH $5.15
    VERMONT $7.53
    VIRGINIA $5.85
    WASHINGTON $7.93
    WEST VIRGINIA $6.55
    WISCONSIN $6.50
    WYOMING $5.15

The moral of this story is that if you're going to work a McJob, do it in Washington where you'll be paid $7.93. Say, what's the cost of living like in Washington?

Department of Labor

]]>
Consumerist-281808 Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:10:53 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=281808&view=rss&microfeed=true