<![CDATA[Consumerist: Competition]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Competition]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/competition http://consumerist.com/tag/competition <![CDATA[ California Declares Free Market Broken, Recommends Price Controls For Phone Services ]]> Verizon, AT&T, and their regulated cohorts love to blab how the "free market" and "competition" will keep prices low for consumers. According to California, it's a big fat expensive lie. The cost of basic phone service has soared since the Public Utilities Commission lifted price controls in 2006, leading the agency to conclude:

"There is no indication of any change in the near future regarding the current state of competition. Market forces have not yet met the challenge of controlling price increases."

Here are just a few of the ways competition has benefited consumers:

  • AT&T no longer lets you make five free 411 calls per month. Now it costs $1.50 for local numbers and $1.99 for all others.
  • Verizon won't let you make four free 411 inquiries anymore. Now they charge $0.95 for local listings and $1.50 for all others.
  • AT&T boosted the price of daytime calls by 34%, evening calls by 93%, and nights and weekend calls by 233%
  • Call waiting is now 86% more expensive.
  • Keeping your name out of the phonebook now costs 346% more.
AT&T defended their thievery by cryptically uttering: "The marketplace changes and you have to change your offerings." Ohhhh, sure, we see. These "marketplace changes" must really be hurting the poor telecoms.
In a recent briefing for investors, AT&T boasted that its average monthly revenue per primary household line "ramped steadily over the past several quarters," to $60.16 in the first quarter of 2008 from $57.08 a year earlier.

So much for all that competition between Verizon, AT&T, Frontier, SureWest, Vonage, Skype, and others.

The telecoms have repeatedly proven that their version of the "free market" is a scam that harms consumers and enriches shareholders. California's Public Utilities Commission has recommended the only reasonable measure: reinstating price controls.

Getting the 411 on phone charges [The Los Angeles Times]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-5037810 Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:00:01 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5037810&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ FCC Approves Sirius-XM Merger ]]> Space. The final frontier. These are the voyages of Sirius-XM. Its continuing mission: to explore strange new anti-consumer practices. To seek out new revenue streams and crowd out new competitors. To boldly safeguard the dangerous monopoly granted last night by the FCC.

Or something like that.

The Commission approved the controversial merger last night on a 3-2 party-line vote. The nation's only two satellite radio operators have agreed to abide by several voluntarily conditions:

  • Consumers will be able to purchase small a la carte packages.
  • Third parties will be allowed to design and sell their own receivers.
  • Sirius-XM will soon rollout an interoperable receiver that can receive signals from both companies.
  • 4% of the new conglomerate's channels will be reserved for public interest programming.
  • No price hikes for three years.
The company earned Republican Commissioner Deborah Tate's swing vote after agreeing to make a $19.7 million payoff "voluntary contribution" to the FCC for violating Commission regulations.

The two Democratic Commissioners were receptive to a merger, but voted against the deal after the companies refused to offer strong consumer protections.

"I was hoping to forge a bipartisan solution that would offer consumers more diversity in programming, better price protection, greater choices among innovative devices and real competition with digital radio," Adelstein declared. "Instead, it appears they're going to get a monopoly with window dressing. We missed a great opportunity to reach a bipartisan agreement that would have benefited the American people."

Last week, Adelstein told reporters that he'd back the proposed union if the two parties honored a six-year price cap, include digital radio in all tuners, and "make one-quarter of their satellite capacity available for public interest and minority programming."

Both Sirius and XM received their satellite radio licenses from the FCC in 1997 under the condition that they never merge.

Satellite Radio Merger Approved [Washington Post]
Report: FCC set to approve XM Radio-Sirius merger (updated) [Ars Technica]
PREVIOUSLY: XM-Sirius Merger Will Double Monthly Prices?

]]>
Consumerist-5029441 Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:00:00 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5029441&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Cable: The Worst Deal Of The Decade ]]> The price of everything in the telecom world has fallen over the past decade, except for cable. Cable is now 77% more expensive than it was ten years ago, an increase that dwarfs the rate of inflation and makes telecom executives salivate. The Times looks with pity on all of us who splay our wallets wide for the industry, and asks if there's any salvation other than à la carte pricing.

The starting point for comparison is 1996, when Congress deregulated the telecom industry, ostensibly to spur competition. Startups and cable companies quickly trammelled the telecoms' ability to dictate prices, but nobody emerged to take on cable.

Kevin J. Martin, chairman of the F.C.C., said in an interview that since 1996, when Congress increased competition in telecommunications, prices have dropped for many other services.

“We’ve seen the opposite occur in the cable industry,” he said. “The dramatic increases in pricing we’ve seen are one of the most troubling issues from a consumer point of view.”

In 2007, average monthly revenue for each Cablevision subscriber was $75, up from $65 in 2005, according to SNL Kagan, a research company. At Time Warner it was $64, up from $54.50.

The industry isn't changing its prices or practices because consumers aren't changing their habits.

“I work eight hours a day facing a computer. When I come home, the last thing I want to do is mess with another computer,” said Eric Yu, 24, a college student in San Francisco who pays around $80 a month for cable.

Mr. Yu said he watches only a handful of channels, including some in high definition like National Geographic. But to get them, he has to pay for a premium package. “I just pay the bill and try to forget about it,” he said. “It lessens the pain.”

Well, some are...

Evelyn Tan, 22, a friend of Mr. Yu, takes a different approach. She pays Comcast $33 a month for Internet access and does not get cable television — but she does watch TV programming.

In fact, she watches ABC shows like “Desperate Housewives” and “Gray’s Anatomy,” which are free on the Web. When she wants to watch shows or movies that are not readily available online, she says she easily pirates them. “I would not pay for cable TV at all,” she said.

A la carte programming isn't coming anytime soon, but the monopolistic anti-consumer juggernaut Verizon might provide some relief as it elbows its way into the television business. While Verizon is no better than its cable competitors, its arrival opens a brief window for competition by allowing consumers play one giant against the other to eek out slight savings on cable programming.

Of course, those slight savings might only bring your rates closer to what you were paying two or three years ago. Neither the Times nor the FCC think cable is worth the cost. What do you think?

Cable Prices Keep Rising; Customers Keep Paying [NYT]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-5010843 Sat, 24 May 2008 11:12:25 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5010843&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ L.A. County Tells Taco Trucks To Keep Moving ]]> Peter writes to let us know that taco trucks in Los Angeles county now have to move to a new position every hour: "The county of Los Angeles has enacted some new legislation to prevent taco truck owners from staying in one spot, with penalties of a fine of up to $1000 or jail for failures to comply." Why such a weird law? Because area restaurants say they're stealing away customers. If you like your carne asada from the side of a truck, be prepared to start chasing them down as they circle through L.A. county in a weird Mexican-food carousel.

The L.A. Times says the move is driven by pure greed on the part of brick-and-mortar restaurants, and that the new legislation attacks an L.A. institution:

Forget the Getty — it's the taco trucks, and their crowds, that are the true culture of L.A. Attacking the trucks is like New York going after its hot dog stands or Memphis banning barbecue pits.
 
And other than raw greed, I can't see any reason for it. Ron Mukai, an East L.A. developer, says the trucks are unfair competition, edging out the "legitimate brick-and-mortar businesses." But the county's 14,000 registered catering trucks seem just as legitimate as restaurants—they're just providing a different service. Restaurants provide meals, and a table to eat them at, and walls to eat them within. Taco trucks provide food, pure and simple. They charge less because they're selling less.
One website, saveourtracotrucks.org, even has an online petition—although we suspect Angelinos will have better luck voting with their dollars than with an online signature.
 
"In defense of the great taco truck" [L.A. Times]
(Photo: papalars) ]]>
Consumerist-386977 Mon, 05 May 2008 11:14:03 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386977&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ XM-Sirius Merger Will Double Monthly Prices? ]]> xmsiriusmerger.jpgWhat does the XM-Sirius satellite radio merger mean for XM customers? Well, according to one customer service rep, it means mean prices are going to roughly double in May. Here's what she said to one of our tipsters:
This is strictly confidential, but all the paperwork is signed and ready to go, and XM has fully acquired Sirius Radio. Come May, there will be a substantial price increase for XM Radio, as it will, in June or so, host all the Sirius channels. It would be best to simply extend your XM plan as we will honor your current contract price per month before we begin hosting the Sirius stations.
The tipster said he believed she said the price was going to double. Perhaps the customer service rep just wanted to score a renewal, but if true, it would certainly at least be ironic considering when the DOJ approved the deal was they said, "the evidence did not show that the merger would enable the parties to profitably increase prices to satellite radio customers." However, reader comments on this post and this post over at Orbitcast say this customer service rep is full of pure baloney.

]]>
Consumerist-374054 Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:29:16 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=374054&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The DOJ has approved a merger between Sirius ... ]]> The DOJ has approved a merger between Sirius and XM satellite radio, ruling that there wasn't enough evidence to show that it would result in higher prices for consumers. We'll see. [OrbitCast]

]]>
Consumerist-371661 Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:23:52 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=371661&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Intel To Sell Ultra-Cheap Classmate PC To Americans ]]> Die%20OLPC%20Die.jpgGreat news, America: Intel's ultra-cheap Classmate PC isn't just for impoverished third-world schoolchildren anymore! The chipmaker today announced plans to sell the notebook domestically in the coming months. Intel insists its sub-notebook isn't designed to compete with the non-profit One Laptop Per Child project, which is powered by chips from Intel's rival, AMD, but they have aggressively moved to undercut OLPC wherever possible. The laptop will likely cost Americans less than $500.

Although the second-generation laptop is expected to cost from $250 to $350 to make, it would be priced higher for retail sale after it's loaded with various software applications, Kwan said.

She noted that the computer's price and features are still being hashed out between Intel and the companies considering making it, which she declined to name. Whichever company eventually manufactures the new machine might choose to make several versions, each loaded with different combinations of applications and selling for different prices.

Those options will be brought up in a meeting Intel plans to have with some computer manufacturing executives soon. "We are going to talk about the next generation features of it in the next couple of weeks," Kwan said.

In fairness, we have an OLPC and think its open-source approach is morally and technically superior for new computer users. That said, it hangs unused in our bathroom because it's useless compared to our other computers.

Would you consider buying the Classmate or one of its competitors for yourself or your kids? Tell us why in the comments.

Intel to offer low-cost laptop [Mercury News]
(AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

]]>
Consumerist-370587 Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:25:53 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370587&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Yahoo rejects Microsoft's takeover bid for ... ]]> Yahoo rejects Microsoft's takeover bid for reals for reals. We are safe from the threat of the creation of the world's largest, crappiest, search engine...for now. [AP]

]]>
Consumerist-354916 Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:00:00 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=354916&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dreyer Loses Truck Deathmatch To Häagen-Dazs ]]> Jay writes: "I caught these two photos on my way in to work today in San Diego. At first I just thought is was amusing that the Dreyers truck was on its side, it really is the little things in life that make it worth living. Then I saw the Haagen-Dazs ice cream truck nearby, standing in victory. Apparently Haagen-Dazs is no longer satisfied with being the superior ice cream, they must now ram their competition off the road."

You never knew the ice cream bizness was so mad gangsta, did you? This is worse than the time Vanilla Bean took out Heath Bar Crunch. Bigger picture inside...

dreyeresbig.jpg

haagenbig.jpg

]]>
Consumerist-340002 Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:44:24 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=340002&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Want A Thriving Coffee Shop? Open Next To A Starbucks ]]> The funny thing about Starbucks is it's helped to create a coffee culture filled with a significant number of people who don't actually like Starbucks—which means that, despite conventional wisdom, it's actually a good thing to be a mom & pop coffee shop with a Starbucks nearby, writes Slate. Instead of stealing your business, you get the spillover from their store. "They'll do all of your marketing for you, and your sales will soar."

That's certainly how it worked out for Hyman. Soon after declining Starbucks's buyout offer, Hyman received the expected news that the company was opening up next to one of his stores. But instead of panicking, he decided to call his friend Jim Stewart, founder of the Seattle's Best Coffee chain, to find out what really happens when a Starbucks opens nearby. "You're going to love it," Stewart reported. "They'll do all of your marketing for you, and your sales will soar." The prediction came true: Each new Starbucks store created a local buzz, drawing new converts to the latte-drinking fold. When the lines at Starbucks grew beyond the point of reason, these converts started venturing out—and, Look! There was another coffeehouse right next-door! Hyman's new neighbor boosted his sales so much that he decided to turn the tactic around and start targeting Starbucks. "We bought a Chinese restaurant right next to one of their stores and converted it, and by God, it was doing $1 million a year right away," he said.
We've noticed that Starbucks has had another "positive" effect on the coffee house industry—it's trained consumers to willingly pay over $1.50 for a cuppa joe no matter where they're buying it. Maybe this is why "Just over the five-year period from 2000 to 2005... the number of mom and pops grew 40 percent, from 9,800 to nearly 14,000 coffeehouses," and "the failure rate for new coffeehouses is a mere 10 percent."

P.S. Starbucks is awesome. Playstation is awesome. Nintendo is awesome. Apple is awesome. Microsoft is awesome. Dunkin' Donuts is awesome. Just wanted to prime the comments a little before we head into the weekend.

"Don't Fear Starbucks" [Slate]
(Photo: rudolf_schuba)

]]>
Consumerist-338863 Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:56:59 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338863&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ JetBlue Wants You, Canada ]]> Increased competition may drive airfares to Canada lower if JetBlue gets it way. The low-cost airline has applied to begin serving our neighbor to the north, says the Globe and Mail.

Low-cost U.S. carrier JetBlue Airways Corp. is applying to launch charter and scheduled service between Canada and the United States, a move that is expected to shake up Canadian rivals and reduce transborder fares.

JetBlue, which built its reputation on a combination of low fares and in-flight services such as free snacks and seatback screens with live television, proposes to use 150-seat Airbus A320s and 100-seat Embraer ERJ-190s for new flights into Canada.

JetBlue will start flying private charter jets to and from Canada next spring and are waiting on regulatory approval to begin regular commercial service.

Domestic airlines face low-cost rival from U.S. [Globe and Mail]

]]>
Consumerist-318433 Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:45:11 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=318433&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Congress Asks FCC To <i>Accurately</i> Count U.S. Broadband Homes ]]> con_accuratecountingonchalk.jpg Congress has added its voice to the growing number of critics who have noted that the FCC is misreporting broadband penetration in the U.S. According to eWeek, last Wednesday a House subcommittee "approved legislation to change the Federal Communications Commission's methodology for determining deployment." The FCC currently counts a single home in a zip code as representative of the full zip code—so one home having broadband access is considered the same as every home in that area having broadband access. By doing this, they inflate the number of homes with broadband access and present a picture of increased "natural" competition in the market, which is then used by telecoms and lobbyists to argue against policy decisions that don't favor existing corporations.

The committee chairman, Rep. Ed Markey, said this about requiring the FCC to collect data more accurately:

The state of knowledge around the status of broadband services in the United States also affects the ability of policymakers to make sound decisions. The federal government can do a much better job in reforming multibillion-dollar grant and subsidy programs—whether at the Rural Utilities Service or the universal service program at the FCC.
To get the legislation moving, Markey had to compromise on a couple of key data points that would have been useful:
Since the bill was introduced earlier this year, Markey has compromised with Republicans by no longer redefining broadband as speeds of at least 2M bps. Republicans also rejected Markey's idea that broadband providers give the government information on prices and speed.

"Lawmakers Approve Broadband Mapping Plan" [eWeek via Techdirt]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-311595 Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:08:39 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=311595&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Retributive Airlines "Tweak" Each Other, Offer Great Fares To Consumers ]]> Rick Seaney has a great post about the "tweak," a move used by airlines to piss off competitors by offering discount airfares from their rival's hubs. The spurned airline will often retaliate by tweaking the offender back in return. Rick Seany explains:

At 10am Airtran filed an airfare between Memphis and Minneapolis (both are Northwest Hubs) for $69 each way — $50 less than the current cheapest price on Northwest (Northwest has the only daily non-stop).

So why do airlines employ the "tweak"?

Airlines watch each other closely. They certainly don't want to be blindsided by another airline and are fiercely protective of their market share between certain cities. So in this case it is most likely that Airtran doesn't like something that Northwest "did" to them out of Atlanta (Airtran's Hub).

The practice is apparently fairly common. If you live near a hub, keep an eye open for competitors trying to tweak the entrenched carrier.

How Do Airlines "Tweak" Each Other? [Rick Seaney]
(Photo: Larsz)

]]>
Consumerist-288596 Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:11:38 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=288596&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Walmart Instigates Back-To-School Season Price War ]]> Walmart will offer 10 to 50 percent discounts on 16,000 items to boost sales during the lucrative back-to-school season. The cuts are part of Walmart's broader plan to abandon its pursuit of the upscale market, which "confused customers," and return to its core business of undercutting competition and instigating price wars.

From the AP:

Wal-Mart has been playing up its low prices since late last year after getting hurt by a focus on trendy merchandise in an effort to get affluent customers to buy more than just groceries. While the upscale strategy worked in electronics, it failed in home furnishings and apparel, resulting in sluggish sales since last fall.
Skittish investors are already worried that a price war might decimate profits for J.C. Penney and Sears. Good deals on colored pencils and graphing calculators should appear in stores by the end of the week.

In bid to revive sales, Wal-Mart will slash back-to-school prices [AP]
(Photo: laffy4k)

]]>
Consumerist-282104 Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:12:47 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=282104&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Online Travel Sites Waive Booking Fees To Compete With Airlines ]]> Several travel sites are scrapping booking fees to keep customers away from individual airline sites. Savvy customers currently research fares with travel sites, and then buy directly from airlines to avoid booking fees.

"Hotwire.com announced this week that it would drop its $6-a-ticket charge for airline reservations on both its "opaque" reservations (the bargain-priced fares that don't let you know exactly what flight you've booked until after you've paid) and regular bookings through summer. Last week, Priceline.com announced it was suspending booking charges on regular airfares through Labor Day. (The deal excludes its opaque, name-your-own-price fares.) Fees range from $5 a domestic ticket to up to $9.95 for an international reservation.

And on Wednesday, Cheaptotravel.com, a sister site to Travelocity that launched in January and targets price-sensitive travelers, followed suit, dropping its $3-a-ticket fee through the summer. A fourth agency, TripSync, a niche site geared to business travelers, may have triggered the no-fee movement when it permanently dropped its fees in late March."

The big players in the online travel world - Expedia, Orbitz and Travelocity - are keeping their booking fees for the moment, but hopefully pricing pressure from the competition will help show them the error of their ways.

Some booking fees melt in summer [USA Today]
(Photo: alex-s)

]]>
Consumerist-278580 Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:20:37 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=278580&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Open Skies Agreement Means TransAtlantic Airways Cleared For Competition ]]> Transatlantic travelers should be treated to lower costs and increased offerings, thanks to the "Open Skies" agreement signed yesterday between the US and the EU.

The historic deal allows any American airline to fly into Europe and any European airline to fly into the states. American planes can also travel between European countries, although European planes can't travel between US states.

What can we say, pretty sweet. — BEN POPKEN

Open Skies Deal Signed [AP via Upgrade: Travel Better]
(Photo: Ben Popken)

]]>
Consumerist-256723 Tue, 01 May 2007 11:13:42 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=256723&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Virgin America's Awesome Plane DOT Won't Let You Ride ]]> Look at this sweet ride. Leather seats for first class and coach. Roomy seating. Electrical outlets. USB ports. Standard-size headphone jacks. In-flight entertainment system that lets you watch movies, listen to music, order food, and engage in chatroom cybersex with other passengers.

This is Virgin America's vision of budget, yes, budget, air travel. And you can't go on it.

The DOT has tentatively rejected Virgin's app to operate in the U.S., essentially because they're a bunch of tea-snorting brits. Maybe they can install some American figurehead. In any event, Virgin released this video on YouTube and set up LetVAFly.com to take the fight to the consumers.

So if you want them to fly, go to their website and sign their petitions and send letters and wear tshirts and crap. As ever, we're dubious of this marketing effort, but welcome competition to the American air travel market. Come on in, Johnny Reds. — BEN POPKEN

Let VA Fly [via Jaunted]

]]>
Consumerist-229488 Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:06:27 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=229488&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Free Blockbuster Rentals For Netflix Subscribers ]]> Blockbuster will give you a free online rental for each Netflix envelope flap you bring into a store. You must have a Blockbuster membership to qualify. The promotions lasts until Dec. 21. It's an effort to get Netflix subscribers to sign up for Blockbuster's Total Access Online service.

TAO is functionally similar to Netflix but different in that in that its name is longer. — BEN POPKEN

Free Blockbuster rentals for Netflix subscribers [Lifehacker]

]]>
Consumerist-219770 Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:41:32 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=219770&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Wal-Mart Will Help The Puny Humans Compete ]]> monstertruck.jpgIn one of the weirdest business moves we've ever seen, Wal-Mart has decided to award business grants to their own small competitors, even as the company tries to smash them, Incredible Hulk style, into a bloody patina.

The initiative will offer business financial grants, advertising in Wal-Mart stores and training by the company themselves on how to compete with Wal-Mart.

If this sounds like Bruce Lee smiling in your direction and flicking you a butter knife to defend yourself with right before he leaps into action and kicks your sternum out through your back, or buying your toddler a small plastic car to putter around in right before you run him over with a monster truck, that's because it is a lot like that.

Wal-Mart to Offer Help Near Urban Stores [New York Times] (Thanks, Boxtank!)

]]>
Consumerist-165449 Thu, 06 Apr 2006 04:31:58 EDT consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=165449&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Amazon to Build iPod & iTunes Killer? ]]> ipodkill.jpgAmazon.com announced plans to take on iTunes and iPod as early as this summer. It will launch its own Internet music service as well as sell its own branded portable music players.

The online retailer still needs to sign licensing agreements with the four big music companies.

Amazon is thinking about offering the players, which may be built by Samsung, free as part of a subscription offer, or selling them with preloaded songs that could be swapped out for other songs.

Somehow we think it would be appropriate for you to play "Video Killed the Radio Star" now. As part of our customer empowerment program, we'll let you make up the reason why.

Report: Amazon to Compete with iTune, iPod [ComputerWorld]

]]>
Consumerist-155479 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:10:41 EST popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=155479&view=rss&microfeed=true