<![CDATA[Consumerist: chinese poison train]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: chinese poison train]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/chinese poison train http://consumerist.com/tag/chinese poison train <![CDATA[ Keep Your Eye On $24 Million Recalled Pet Food Class Action ]]> If you bought, or your pet ate, pet food recalled after March 17, 2007, keep tabs on this $24 million settlement. This would be the pet food purposely cut with melamine, a (poisonous) byproduct of coal production, because it made the food look it was higher in protein and was cheaper than actual protein. The case is called Re: Pet Food Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1850, Civil Action No. 07-2867 (NLH). The final hearing is on October 14, 2008. The final date for submitting a claim form will be November 24, 2008. To see if you're eligible, check the list of recalled products affected by the settlement (PDF). Food by Nestle-Purina, Royal Canin, Sierra Pet products, Chenangono Valley Pet Food, CJ Foods, Diamond Pet Food, Hill's, American Nutrition, and Del Monte are on the list. Claim forms and more can be found at PetFoodSettlement.com.

PREVIOUSLY: Pet Food Companies Agree To $24 Million Settlement Over Killer Pet Food
(Photo: Ariana Lindquist)

]]>
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:32:16 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023822&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ FDA Believes Heparin Contamination Was Intentional ]]> The New York Times reports that the FDA is now working under the assumption that the deadly contamination of heparin was intentional. In her prepared testimony before a congressional subcommittee, Janet Woodcock, director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation said,
FDA's working hypothesis is that this was intentional contamination, but this has not been proven.
More details, inside...

The FDA discovered that the drug was contaminated with oversulfated condrotin sulfate, which mimics heparin, thus eluding routine tests. Baxter President Robert L. Parkinson Jr. said in his testimony that his company is "greatly concerned that our heparin product appears to be the target of a deliberate adulteration scheme." Additionally he said,
"The complexity of the global drug supply chain creates new and emerging risks that call for new ways of thinking about, identifying and addressing vulnerabilities, and that resting on old standards - even ones that have worked for decades - is no longer enough.
It should be interesting in the coming months to see whether this turns out to be another case of Chinese factories trying to save money or actually a case of malicious intent.

Heparin Contamination May Have Been Deliberate, F.D.A. Says [New York Times]
FDA Official: Heparin Contamination May Have Been Intentional [Fox News]
(Photo: Getty) ]]>
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:49:19 EDT Jay Slatkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5007413&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Senate Votes For Safer Products, Approves Consumer Product Safety Commission Overhaul ]]> The Senate finally voted last week to send the ailing Consumer Product Safety Commission desperately needed funds, staff, and powers. The overdue reform bill passed with bipartisan support on a 79-13 vote.

Significant differences remain between the Senate and House legislation, but compromise seems assured on several key points:

  • Funding for the Commission would rise from $63 million to over $100 million.
  • The CPSC would be allowed to work without a quorum, but funding would be available for a full slate of 5 Commissioners.
  • Lead would effectively be banned from all children's products, not just toys.
  • Toy makers would be required to use independent labs to test their products for lead.
  • Maximum fines would rise from $1.8 million to at least $10 million.

The Senate bill goes farther than companion legislation passed by the House in December. Under the Senate version, state Attorney Generals would be allowed seek injunctions for violations of federal law; whistleblower protection would be extended to private-sector employees; and, the CPSC would create a consumer database that lists death, injury and illness reports.

Thirteen Senators think the bills goes too far and that their families are plenty safe without an expanded CPSC, thank you:

Allard (R-CO)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Corker (R-TN)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)
Senators McCain, Clinton, and Obama were busy campaigning and did not vote on the measure.

The White House has yet to threaten a veto. Stay tuned for updates as the bill heads to conference.

Senate Votes For Safer Products [Washington Post]
Vote Summary [United States Senate]
S. 2663 - A bill to reform the Consumer Product Safety Commission to provide greater protection for children's products, to improve the screening of noncompliant consumer products, to improve the effectiveness of consumer product recall programs, and for other purposes. [THOMAS]
Write Your Representative
PREVIOUSLY: How To Write To Congress

]]>
Sat, 08 Mar 2008 13:34:44 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=365516&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pokemon Valentine's Day Lollipops Should Not Contain Razor Blades ]]> A 10-year-old elementary school student found a razor blade in the Pokemon lollipop he was about to hand to his sister. Dollar General, which sold the lollipop for $1, immediately recalled the remaining Pokemon Valentine Cards and Pops from its 8,300 stores, but they are concerned that "most of this candy has already been purchased."

"I was trying to give my sister some candy and when I looked at it, it had a razor blade in it," said Chris, 10-years-old. His mother asked that we not use his last name.

The Pokemon cards and Valentines Day candy is imported from China by Sherwood Brands. In a recorded message Thursday Dollar General ordered all Pokemon candy and two others removed from store shelves.

"The items are the Pokemon cards and valentines candy. Dog valentine and pops and 20 strip, or 20 count strip Heart pops. Removing these items from the sales floor must become your most important priority today," said the recording from Dollar General Headquarters in Tennessee.

The defective candy's barcode is 073964209109. Parents can return the candy to Dollar General or keep it as a novelty letter opener.

Importer Recalls Valentine Lollipops [AP]
(AP Photo/Polk County Sheriff's Office)

]]>
Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:03:02 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=357383&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Thomas The Tank Engine Makers Settle Class Action With Free Toys ]]> thomasvsdiesel.jpgThomas the Tank Engine makers have settled a class-action-lawsuit against for $30 million, stemming from their production of anthropomorphic toy trains brought to life with lead-tainted paint. Under the terms, RC2 will give cash refunds or replacement toys, plus a "bonus" toy. Hopefully this time RC2 will check to make sure the apology choo-choos aren't lead-tainted as well.

Maker of Thomas toys settles suit on lead paint [Chicago Tribune]

]]>
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:00:32 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=348410&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Chinese Exporters Use Kosher Certification To Quell Food Safety Concerns ]]> Kosher certification is the new darling of health-conscious consumers who misguidedly believe that biblically blessed health standards can reign in the excesses of commercial food production. Even Chinese exporters are betting that kosher certification can convince foreign consumers that their wares are safe. To companies, certification is just a marketing tool: it lends the aura of safety without offering any actual food safety benefits.

Many Chinese companies were unfamiliar with the concept: One furniture maker asked for kosher certification, drawing a polite rebuff. Another facility asked to get certified as kosher even though it was smoking eel on site, a kosher no-no. The company was turned down; it is now building a separate, kosher-only facility.

And many companies weren't ready for the grilling the rabbis gave them on their first visits to their plants, seeing it as a sign of distrust. "In China, everything works on relationships," said Grunberg of the Orthodox Union, which certifies more than 400,000 products worldwide.

Almost 5,000 new Kosher products hit U.S. shelves last year, but they aren't any safer than traife goods.
Whether kosher foods are actually less likely to be contaminated with, say, E. coli bacteria remains up for debate. While research is scant in this area, experts say it makes sense that kosher food could be safer because it's more closely monitored. "Jews aren't allowed to ingest bugs, so produce must go through a thorough washing and checking to ensure that no bugs are found within the leaves or on the surface of the fruit or vegetable," says Moshe Elefant, a rabbi and chief operating officer of the Orthodox Union KOSHER, a kosher certification organization based in New York. But bacteria can remain even after this type of washing, so consumers can't assume they're less likely to get food poisoning with bagged spinach marked kosher than with a conventional bag.

The same caveat applies to poultry and beef. A salting process that removes blood from the meat has antibacterial effects, but salmonella and E. coli can still survive, says Joe Regenstein, a professor of food science who teaches a course on Jewish and Muslim food laws at Cornell University. Kosher beef, though, is much less likely to contain the misshapen proteins that cause mad cow disease, rare as that is, probably because the animals are slaughtered young, before the disease sets in.

Kosher certification is especially ill-suited for the Chinese marketplace. Contamination is caused by corrupt suppliers who substitute cheap poisons for relatively expensive ingredients. We use kosher certification for one thing, and one thing only: finding really good Coke.

Health-conscious consumers put their faith in kosher certification [The Globe and Mail via BarfBlog]
China going kosher after recalls [Mercury News]
(Photo: nicasaurusrex)

]]>
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:30:51 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=346810&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ CPSC Wants To Make Retailers Test Products They Sell ]]> nancynordhead.jpgIf pending legislation passes, the CPSC may make retailers test their wares, and make retailers legally responsible for the products they sell. CPSC chair Nancy Nord said yesterday at a press conference, "the ultimate responsibility at the end of the day to make sure that their products are safe and if they do not, we will take enforcement activity at the product sellers."

Previously, CPSC action has focused on manufacturers. Interesting. The cynic in me says this is a sure sign of how well manufacturers have the CPSC in the pocket. You know they're just itching to not be on the hook. Wouldn't it be more cost effective to focus on the source of the goods, rather than after the fact? On the other hand, everyone in the supply chain should bear some responsibility for the safety of the goods they sell. Perhaps if manufacturers know they can't make a defective product and have it be sold anyway, they will be more careful about what they make in the first place?

In addition, Nord announced the CPSC would use new funds to post full-time inspectors at high-traffic ports, took time to defend trips she took that had come under political fire and scrutiny, to decry presidential candidates using the CPSC issue as a political tool, to describe the media frenzy around 2007 product safety as having approached "hysteria", and settled once and for all that she definitely, definitely, did not break Mom's favorite lamp back at the old Cedar Brook house.

Safety Push Focuses on Retailers [WSJ]
(Photo: AP)

]]>
Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:14:28 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=342098&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Walmart Is Still Selling Recalled Lead-Tainted Bibs ]]> Walmart is still selling lead-tainted Baby Connection bibs that were recalled last May. Reader Jeff made the discovery after his wife accidentally purchased two packs of recalled bibs for their 4-month-old daughter while vacationing in the Poconos.

He writes:

so my wife and i and our 4 month old baby girl took a trip to the Poconos for a vacation back in December. we stopped at the Super Wal-Mart there (East Stroudsburg, PA) to get some supplies. my wife wanted to get some bibs for our baby.

she bought 2 packs of bibs with a vinyl backing so they wouldn't soak through onto her clothes because she always has her bib in her mouth... as it turns out these bibs have already been recalled in Illinois back in May of last year and later supposedly expanded nationwide for having high levels of lead. there were lots of news reports about this from back in May. after further research we found out the UPC numbers of the bibs and sure enough we had them. they were: Baby Connection 7-Pack Feeder Bibs UPC No. 01468151077. other upc numbers are: 01468152705 and 01468102732

so basically, it just makes us sick to our stomach that these companies will sell products to consumers that they know have high amounts of lead in them. why were'nt these bibs taken off the shelves in ALL of their stores. why does a child in Illinois have better protection than my child in New Jersey (although we bought the bibs in Pennsylvania)?

thanks guys, keep up the good work,

jeff

Children in Illinois are safer because the state bans the sale of products containing more than 600 ppm of lead. The Consumer Product Safety Commission has warned all parents that vinyl bibs may be tainted with lead, but refuses to issue a nationwide recall.

Walmart voluntarily agreed to pull the lead-ridden bibs back in May to avoid the fine-wielding ire of Illinois' Attorney General.

Mia Masten, a Chicago-based spokeswoman for Wal-Mart, said the vinyl portion of the bibs exceeded the lead levels set by Illinois for children's products. She said the company had worked with the Illinois attorney general's office to pull the items and later decided to expand the recall nationwide.

"We at Wal-Mart are committed to working ... to develop industry standards for the elimination of vinyl in children's products," Masten said.

Maybe those industry standards should have include a directive to pull recalled products from the shelf? Just a suggestion. ]]>
Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:00:18 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=341314&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Breaking News: There Are Sweatshops In China! ]]> Economists and politicians rant about China in terms of jobs lost, currency valuation, and trade gaps. But the New York Times reports that a new metric has been discovered: every year, Chinese workers manufacturing our toys, garments and electronic junk in the Peal River Delta collectively break 40,000 fingers.

Underage workers are forced to work overtime in dangerous conditions for little pay, a widespread reality factory owners easily conceal from incompetent inspectors.

A former Huanya employee who was reached by telephone gave a similar account of working conditions, saying many workers suffered from skin rashes after working with gold powders and that others were forced to sign papers "volunteering" to work overtime.

"It's quite noisy, and you stand up all day, 12 hours, and there's no air-conditioning," he said. "We get paid by the piece we make but they never told us how much. Sometimes I got $110, sometimes I got $150 a month."

In its 58-page report, the National Labor Committee scolded Wal-Mart for not doing more to protect workers. The group charged that last July, Huanya recruited about 500 16-year-old high school students to work seven days a week, often 15 hours a day, during peak production months for holiday merchandise.

Several students interviewed at the Guangzhou Technical School, less than two miles from Huanya, confirmed that classmates ages 16 to 18 had spent the summer working at the factory.

Some high school students later went on strike to protest the harsh conditions, the report said. The students also told labor officials that at least seven children, as young as 12 years old, were working in the factory.

"At Wal-Mart, Christmas ornaments are cheap, and so are the lives of the young workers in China who make them," the National Labor Committee report said.

Walmart is not alone. Human rights activists also jeer Disney and Dell for shunting underage kids through labor mills.

Who is to blame? Economics. Factory owners will do anything to provide goods at everyday low prices. The reward for their productivity vastly outweighs the risk of a crackdown from China's notoriously corrupt regulators.

"The factories have improved immeasurably over the past few years," says Alan Hassenfeld, chairman of the toy maker Hasbro and co-chairman of Care, the ethical-manufacturing program of the International Council of Toy Industries. "But let me be honest: there are some bad factories. We have bribery and corruption occurring but we are doing our best."

Some factories are warned about audits beforehand and some factory owners or managers bribe auditors. Inexperienced inspectors may also be a problem.

Some major Western auditing firms working in China even hire college students from the United States to work during the summer as inspectors, an indication that they are not willing to invest in more expensive or sophisticated auditing programs, critics say.

Chinese suppliers regularly outsource to other suppliers, who may in turn outsource to yet another operation, creating a supply chain that is hard to follow — let alone inspect.

Ok, consuming goods from China helps support this demoralizing system where underage, uneducated, and unprotected workers slave for capitalist interests. How can American companies show that they are taking these weighty ethical concerns seriously?
There is little that any Western company can do about those issues, no matter how seriously they take corporate social responsibility — other than leaving China.
In Chinese Factories, Lost Fingers and Low Pay [NYT]
(AP Photo/Oded Balilty) ]]>
Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:05:13 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=340988&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Toy Industry Association Will Announce New Safety Plan In February ]]> Well we're glad that's taken care of. Wait... the Toy Industry Association is a trade group, not a federal agency! At any rate, on February 1st the Toy Industry Association, a 500-member strong group, will "release a draft of tough new safety rules, which include a plan to require manufacturers to test toys for hazardous chemicals and defective designs." According to CNN, the group is drafting the 3-point plan with at least the awareness, if not the help, of the CPSC, and it hopes to have the plan formally certified as the CPSC's "new standard for toy safety."

We're amused/annoyed by the subtle way the TIA continues to push the idea that the bad toys of 2007 aren't the fault of U.S. manufacturers' decisions to cut corners. Just take a look at the language in this press release (emphasis ours):

"We are developing a system that will help to assure that products entering the U.S. market meet this nation's rigorous toy safety requirements, whether those requirements are defined in standards or regulations," association President Carter Keithley, said in a statement.
Thanks for protecting us from China, TIA! But now who do we ask to protect us from Mattel?

"Toy safety plan to debut Feb. 1" [CNN Money]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:21:28 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=337791&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Country Of Origin Labeling Expanded To Chickens, Macadamia Nuts, And Goat Meat ]]> Ever wonder where your goat meat came from? No? Well several Senators did, so their chamber's version of the farm bill extends country of origin labeling to chickens, macadamia nuts, and goat meat. The labels, which are already required for beef, pork, lamb, peanuts, fresh fruits, and vegetables, should appear by late next year.

At the request of the chicken industry, the Senate farm bill would add chicken to the list of meats that would be labeled by country of origin beginning Oct. 1. Chicken producers have taken the opposite position of most beef and pork groups, which have opposed labeling. Richard Lobb, a spokesman for the National Chicken Council, said the industry asked Senate leaders to add chicken to the list because other countries have expressed an interest in exporting chicken to the United States and consumers are becoming increasingly concerned about the origin of food. Lobb noted that 95 percent consumed in the United States is domestically produced, but the Agriculture Department has granted Chile the right to export chicken to the United States and is considering an application from China.
We love patriotic chicken because it tastes like freedom. The macadamia nut provisions were pushed by Hawaii's Senators, but we still don't know who lobbied to protect goat meat. The farm bill is currently simmering in conference committee as the House and Senate reconcile their differences.

Senate Slips Chicken Into COOL Farm Bill Provision [Cattle Network]
(Photo: foxypar4)

]]>
Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:30:48 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=337066&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ China will allow US food inspectors to be ... ]]> China will allow US food inspectors to be posted inside its factories. No doubt the factory owners will adapt by processing food outside the factory. [NYT]

]]>
Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:39:30 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=332857&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ China and US sign product safety pact. Lucky ... ]]> China and US sign product safety pact. Lucky thing they got that one banged out before Christmas. [AP]

]]>
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:23:01 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=332369&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Recalls: Starbucks Fusion Coffee Mugs (burn), ... ]]> Recalls: Starbucks Fusion Coffee Mugs (burn), Home Depot Holiday Figurines (lead), Scope Apparel Boys' Hooded Sweatshirts with Drawstrings (strangulation), RC2 First Years 3-in-1 Flush and Sounds Potty Seats (lead), RC2 First Years Newborn-to-Toddler Reclining Feeding Seats (falling), Sears Personal Identity-brand V-neck sweaters with hood (strangulation), Basic Editions-brand girls' clothing sets (entrapment, strangulation), TKS-brand children's pants (entrapment), Collins International Oscillating Ceramic Heaters sold at Menards (fire), Polaris Ranger RZR 800 EFI Utility Vehicles (fire, burn), Bowflex® Ultimate 2 Home Gyms (injury).

]]>
Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:35:54 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=330744&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ You can enter your kids' toys here and find ... ]]> You can enter your kids' toys here and find out if they've been recalled for toxins. [HealthyToys.org]

]]>
Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:01:00 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=329871&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ An amusing animation depicting the CPSC's ... ]]> An amusing animation depicting the CPSC's epic failures through song and dance, brought to you by Consumers Union, makers of Consumer Reports. Unfortunately, neither the Chinese Poison Train nor Snively Whiplash made an appearance. [NotInMyCart]

]]>
Mon, 03 Dec 2007 11:55:54 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=329197&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Only 22% Of American Importers Of Chinese Goods Have Reviewed Their Supply Chain ]]> survey300.jpgA survey of global manufacturers found that only 22% have reviewed their supply chain in light of the Mattel lead toy recall situation. Of that number, 1/3 said they would change how they go about evaluating suppliers. 30% said they were sending quality inspectors to overseas plants. Most of the executives said their greatest fear in doing business with China wasn't defective products, but that the Chinese would make knockoffs of their wares.

Survey: Global Manufacturers Staying Put in China [the smart cube blog]

]]>
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:35:53 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=328481&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ China Will Not Be Banned From Exporting Toys To EU ]]> con_toysthroughwindow.jpg Here's something everyone can be thankful for—the Chinese, Europeans, and tangentially everyone in America and the rest of the world who have spent the better part of last year dodging lead bullets from the factory nation. The European Union's consumer chief has said that China has made "quantum leaps" in improving its safety protocols, and will therefore not face a ban in the EU.

This doesn't end the heavy scrutiny China faces in the EU for its shoddy safety record—the EU says it will continue to expect detailed reports every 3 to 4 months.

"To be honest we didn't expect such a positive response from the Chinese authorities," another Commission official said.

"But it just shows that the carrot and stick approach works. You cannot just go around banning everything from China. It would be ludicrous for both the industry and consumer, who would end up having to pay more in the run-up to Christmas.

"The two significant moves by China have been to increase their checks 10-fold, right down to regional level and the withdrawal of thousands of export licences," the official added.

"China makes "quantum leap" to avoid toy ban: EU" [Reuters]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:52:36 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=325606&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ California Sues Toy Companies Over Lead ]]> con_gavelgavelgavel.jpg This week, California's attorney general filed a lawsuit against 20 companies implicated in the various lead-tainted toy fiascos of 2007. The lawsuit "alleges that the companies violated the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986... because they didn't notify customers of toys in the marketplace that contained high concentrations of lead." The federal government doesn't require such labeling, but California does.

If they lose the suit, the companies could have to pay as much as "$2,500 per day for each violation."

Mattel has responded by saying that they've been "in continuous communication" with California's attorney general's office and that they've "cooperated fully in the matter" throughout the recall. Apparently Mattel takes California more seriously than the CPSC then—remember when they told the Wall Street Journal that "the company discloses problems on its own timetable because it believes both the law and the commission's enforcement practices are unreasonable"?

Some companies named in the suit:

  • Mattel Inc.
  • Toys R Us
  • Fisher-Price Inc.
  • xMichaels Stores Inc.
  • Sears, Roebuck and Co.
  • Costco Wholesale Corp
  • Eveready Battery Co.
  • Kmart Corp.
  • Marvel Entertainment

"California sues 20 companies for toys with unlawful amounts of lead" [SFGate]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:25:55 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=325174&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dinner Plates On Walmart Shelves Contain Lead ]]> leadplates.jpgWhat are you feeding your children tonight? How about a hearty helping of lead? KUTV did a followup on their report yesterday about lead in dinner plates. Their investigative reporter bought more plates from Walmart. After heating them to 85 degrees, the plates leached out lead at .381 parts per million. The plates were made in China. The government says that anything below 2.0 is acceptable. But unlike a toy where you're mainly just coming in skin contact with the toy, with a plate, the lead is actually seeping into the food and you're eating it.

Lead Plates Followup: Utah Wants To Know! [KUTV] (Thanks to Jay!)
PREVIOUSLY: Baby Poisoned By Lead-Tainted Walmart Plates

]]>
Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:56:43 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=322894&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 9 Children Hospitalized After Eating GHB-Filled Aqua Dots ]]> playtime.jpgThe CPSC says 9 children have been hospitalized after eating Aqua Dots beads. The craft toy contains a glue that breaks down in party drug GHB when ingested. The toy was made by a Chinese factory, whose license was suspended following the recall. Reportedly, the toxic glue cost 1/3 less than the glue they were supposed to use.

China Confirms Poison Was on Toy Beads [NYT]
PREVIOUSLY:
Recalled Date Rape Drug-Filled Toy Looks Pretty Cool
Popular Australian Toy Filled With GHB

]]>
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:52:47 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=321555&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How The "Date Rape Drug" Was Found Inside A Children's Toy ]]> The New York Times has a great article about the doctor who figured out that the "Aqua Dots" or "Bindeez" beads were full of GHB. It reads like a summary of an episode of House, M.D.:

Doctors at the Children's Hospital at Westmead, outside Sydney, first believed that the 2-year-old boy, whose name has not been released, had an inherited metabolic disorder. But when Dr. Carpenter checked urine samples the next day for the chemical markers of the disorder, he found GHB, which can render victims unconscious and even cause death through respiratory failure.

"We suspected at that time the child had been surreptitiously given" the drug by a family member or friend of the family, he said by phone from Sydney on Wednesday.

A follow-up test two days later showed that the GHB had disappeared from the boy's body, which confirmed that the chemical had been ingested and was not occurring because of a genetic disorder. It was then that Dr. Carpenter learned that the boy had vomited beads before and after going into a shallow coma.

Dr. Carpenter obtained more of the boy's beads and tested them in a mass spectrometer, a device that helps identify chemical compounds. "I saw a large peak of a substance I didn't recognize," he said.

The "peak" was an obscure industrial chemical used to prevent water-soluble glues from becoming sticky before they are needed. But when ingested, the chemical quickly breaks down to become GHB. The United States tightly restricts the chemical's sale and places GHB in the same category as heroin.

The article then goes on to try to figure out how the dangerous chemical got into the beads in the first place. With the doctor's help, the reporter managed to track down the Hong Kong manufacturer of the beads, but was not able to get them to comment.

Sleuthing for a Danger in Toy Beads [NYT]
(Photo:Tony Sernack for The New York Times)

]]>
Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:38:14 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=320480&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Fake Med Promoted Via Fraudulent Government Health & Drug Watchdog Site ]]> con_fakeandrealsites.jpg The Chinese government has discovered a fake diabetes medicine on a fake research institute website, which then links to a fake version of the official government health and drug watchdog agency's site. If you're paying attention to urls, it's hard to not notice that something's wrong—but we're sure there's more than enough people who don't notice that little detail.

The article isn't clear on whether or not the drug is entirely imaginary, or whether it's actually being sold as a treatment for diabetes. But either way, it's an over-the-top scam—and, what with the executions and all, we think a dangerous one to pull in China. It even managed to get a Chinese official to speak in English idioms, according to the article's quote:

"This site is definitely not for real," an official at the regulator was quoted as saying. "These lawbreakers have got some balls!"

"Fraudsters fake Web site of drug watchdog" [Reuters]

RELATED
Real Chinese Health & Drug Website
Fake Site

]]>
Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:16:55 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=319167&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ China Revokes 750 Export Licenses, Orders 690 Toy Factories To Renovate ]]> Worried that the whole tainted export thing might further poison their image, China this week revoked the export licenses of 750 toy factories citing quality control problems. The move came just as the Senate Commerce Committee passed the CPSC Reform Act, which would strengthen domestic toy safety standards and impose penalties of up to $100 million on companies that sell dangerous toys.

Despite the announcement of the license suspensions, Chinese regulators said 99 percent of toy exports in southern Guangdong Province, near Hong Kong, met quality standards.

But those figures seemed contradictory; regulators in Guangdong said that they had visited over 1,700 facilities and that 764, more than a third, had their licenses revoked. Nearly as many were ordered to bring their factories up to quality standards.

The license revocations won't affect the holiday season. Our manufactured toys are already gently floating over the Pacific and will arrive just in time to sneak under Christmas trees and Hanukkah bushes.

China still hasn't addressed the rampant corruption at the local level that allows business to skirt regulations, nor have they reformed the nation's regulatory system. This is just a random cracking of the whip to remind us that China still hasn't forgotten about toy safety.

China Bars Exports by 750 Toy Makers [NYT]
(AP Photo/Eugene Hoshiko)

]]>
Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:03:57 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=318544&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ CPSC Tells Companies, "Don't Recall Products On Your Own" ]]> con_cpscandwalmartfight.jpg A CPSC spokeswoman said this week that Wal-Mart's independent recall of lead-tainted toy animals on October 19th was all well and good, but that they should have included more information that consumers need in order to act quickly—including how many products were sold, when they were sold and at what other retailers, and the name of the manufacturer. Said the spokeswoman, "We are not big fans of when companies handle recall announcements independently of the agency. It can cause confusion and doesn't always provide consumers with the information they need."

Wal-Mart announced the recall after its own testing discovered high levels of lead, and it notified the CPSC of the results. A Wal-Mart spokeswoman replied, "We informed the supplier and the CPSC and we felt we had to let our customers know what we'd found." But Wal-Mart still won't provide more information on the recalled toys, leading to a strange battle of wills between the CPSC and the retailer. What gives, Wal-Mart? Afraid of losing your lead-toys competitive edge? The CPSC is legally bound to not disclose details now that the toys are being officially tested, but we're not sure what Wal-Mart's legal obligation is since it announced the recall on its own.

"US product watchdog agency: Wal-Mart toy recall lacked some consumer information" [International Herald Tribune]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:36:27 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=317540&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ China Arrests 774 People Over Safety Issues ]]> con_arrestedman.jpg China has arrested nearly 800 people over the past two months in a "nationwide crackdown on the production and sale of tainted food, drugs and agricultural products," writes the New York Times. The country announced the number officially today on their website, but did not provide details on the violations involved. The announcement is part of a larger campaign to not only rehabilitate China's image around the world, but to address concerns that its domestic products are even less likely to be safe.

For instance, China reported that only 82% of the food tested in medium and large cities met safety standards, and that although "it believes 99 percent of its food exports meet safety standards, only about 80 percent of food sold domestically has passed inspections."

In addition to the arrests, China announced it has banned 13 toxic pesticides from being produced in the country, and that since July, 1,000 tons of fake products have been intercepted at Chinese ports and recalled or destroyed.

"774 Arrests in China Over Safety" [New York Times]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:15:17 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=316586&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ See All CPSC Toy Recalls On One Page ]]> So the CPSC is always recalling all sorts of crap, like the surprising candles which could lead to fire, or the snowboards which could lead to falling, but as a concerned parent, all you care about is the toys. The freakin' toys. The ones with the lead and the chokey parts. Well, even though their website coder probably doubles as the meatloaf server at lunchtime, they've got a catchall page that is your go-to spot for all the toy hazard related recalls. Just memorize the simple URL: http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/category/toy.html.

]]>
Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:06:55 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=314803&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Made in China, Made In A Death Trap ]]> nomask.jpgThe Salt Lake Tribune has a special series written by a reporter who spent a year in China investigating the conditions in 25 factories. While Americans are running around concerned about the long-term effects of lead in toys, real Chinese workers are dying in deplorable working conditions as they put together our cheap gas grills and La-Z-Boy recliners so we can enjoy them at everyday low prices.

One is dying from silicosis from making Char-Broil gas stoves. One lost three fingers making goods for Restoration Hardware. One is suffering from a precursor to leukemia after painting and varnishing furniture bound for America. Others have cadmium poisoning after making batteries for Eveready and Energizer. In all cases, not even basic safety protocols or safety devices were observed. It was simply a matter of what was cheapest and most expedient.

American Imports, Chinese Deaths [Salt Lake Tribune]

]]>
Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:58:58 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=314381&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Walmart Recalls "Realistic Animals" Tainted With Lead ]]> DINOSAURS%20with%20lead.jpgA plague of lead has stricken Walmart's stock of "realistic animals". Affected animals include farm animals, jungle animals, and even the feared dinosaur. The animals are currently trapped in chinsy cellophane bags clad shut by a brandless cardboard strip that proudly boasts: 88 Cents!
"Wal-Mart said independent testing revealed excessive levels of lead in the base material, not the surface coating."

It decided to issue the voluntary recall Friday after verifying the testing and notifying the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and the manufacturer, she said.

Wal-Mart believes the manufacturer has also sold the toys through other retailers. Blakley said Wal-Mart has provided the maker's name and the test data to the CPSC and it would be up to the CPSC to work with the manufacturer to contact other retailers.

The retailer said it was posting photos and details of the affected toys on its Web site, http://www.walmartfacts.com. It said customers may return the product to any Wal-Mart store, with or without a receipt, for a full refund.

Facts not listed on WalmartFacts.com: how many realistic animals are in Walmart stores, or how long they have been stocked. One spokesman said only: "We've had these for a while."

Wal-Mart Recalls Toy Animals for Lead [AP]

]]>
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:10:15 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=313260&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Chinese Goods No Longer Welcome At Trader Joe's ]]> Caving to xenophobia, Trader Joe's announced that it will purge its shelves of all single-ingredient Chinese products by January 1. Will consumers be any safer?

No. The company readily admits that the move is largely symbolic.

"We feel confident that all of our products from China meet the same high quality standards that we set for all of our products," the statement read. "However, our customers have voiced their concerns about products from this region and we have listened.

"We will continue to source products from other regions until our customers feel as confident as we do about the quality and safety of Chinese products."

The Chinese Poison Train rarely fells single-ingredient products, preferring to instead grace constituent ingredients like wheat gluten. Though the announcement - the first of its kind among major retailers - will not make consumers any safer, it is the most pernicious indication yet of consumers skepticism towards foreign goods.

Whole Foods has no plans to implement a similar ban.

Trader Joe's just says no to China [Chicago Sun-Times]
(Photo: Getty Images)

]]>
Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:45:35 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=313195&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Despite problems involving Chinese-made ... ]]> con_tinychristmaselfwithlea.jpg Despite problems involving Chinese-made goods sold in the U.S., a Chinese spokesperson says that orders for Christmas toys are "up" and that factories can't keep up with demand. But he also says, "I urge the importers of Chinese toys to come to China and buy more Chinese toys and I wish children around the world a Merry Christmas," which makes the claim sound like PR spin. [Reuters]

(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:27:26 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=312216&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Good work, America! Your insatiable thirst ... ]]> Good work, America! Your insatiable thirst for cheap Chinese goods sucked products worth $878 billion across the Pacific in the past nine months. That's a 27% increase over last year. What about the Chinese Poison Train? Dong Tao at Credit Suisse scoffs at your concerns: "You know, 40 million toys may be bad for dozens of toy makers in Dongguan. But that's small potatoes for China's over $1 trillion a year of exports." [NYT]

]]>
Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:06:09 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=310272&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Environmental Group Says Curious George Doll Is Tainted With Lead ]]> cgeorge.jpgThe Center for Environmental Health says they've tested a Curious George doll that is currently on stores shelves and found that it contains more than "ten times the legal lead limit", prompting Marvel Entertainment Group to stop new shipments from China.

The toy hasn't been pulled from stores or recalled because Marvel wants to confirm the tests. "If we find a problem, we will do a recall, it's the only appropriate thing to do," a Marvel spokesperson said.

Caroline Cox, spokesperson for the CEH, told the Boston Globe: ""I was quite shocked. We have never seen a toy with levels so high."

Group: Curious George doll tainted with lead [Boston Globe]
Health Group Takes Action to Get the Lead Out of Toys [CES]

]]>
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:54:39 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=309679&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Buy All The Toys You Need Now, Because Prices Are Going Up ]]> con_kidwithtoolittlemoney.jpg Just buy 'em and scrape off the lead paint. Why? Because toy makers will be passing the cost of higher-quality and better-made toys on to you next year. Says one analyst, "Anything that's a new introduction, you can make that price point $19.99 rather than $14.99."

One source of extra costs is an increased inspection schedule. RC2—the company behind the infamous chinese poison train—used to inspect random batches of toys and perform factory inspections twice a year; now, they inspect every batch of toys several times and have bumped up the inspection rate to every quarter. Mega Brands, the company that recalled its Magnetix toys for magnet hazards, has increased its inspection schedule from twice a year to every two weeks.

The result, as another analyst tells Reuters, is "increased monitoring of toy safety could eventually result in a 'mid- single-digit' price increase for consumers."

"U.S. parents want safer toys, but will cost them" [Reuters]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:05:12 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=309118&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Robots And Science Will Keep Our Food Safe ]]> Robots%20Armed%20With%20Science.jpgThe Administration envisions a future where science and technology keep our food supply safe and secure. The multi-agency working group tasked with improving food safety has yet to agree on final recommendations, but both interest groups and the Administration seem dead set against new inspectors. Instead, the working group wants to build upon the current system of random inspections to better target potential dangers among the $2.2 trillion worth of goods imported each year.

...the import safety panel is expected to push for expanded use of technology to more quickly identify risky imports. Leavitt has supported the use of technology at the border that could read the contents of a sports drink bottle, for example, looking for potentially toxic chemicals without opening it. The FDA is developing a food-safety strategy to be unveiled this fall that would rely on risk-based inspection but has not asked for more resources to pay for more inspections.
The Administration's plan is earning awkward glances from Congress and consumer advocates. Consumers Union wants more inspectors on the ground, both here and abroad. Congress wants to reorganize the food safety system under one agency, but for the moment, will settle for more inspectors. Congress plans to fund additional inspections by imposing user fees on many of the interest group members that, unsurprisingly, support the Administration's plan.

Technology Seen as Key To Upgrading Food Safety [Washington Post]
(AP Photo/Katsumi Kasahara)

]]>
Sat, 06 Oct 2007 08:45:38 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307863&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Do Baby Einstein Products Make Your Child Stupid? Well, The Lead Tainted Blocks Don't Help ]]> Back in August, the University of Washington issued a press release about a study in the Journal of Pediatrics that examined the effect that baby videos (such as the Disney "Baby Einstein" series) had on young children.

The study concluded that the videos, when watched alone, were potentially harmful to the development of a child's vocabulary. (The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends no TV for children under 2.)

Disney's CEO, Robert A. Iger, then issued his own press release, demanding a retraction from the University of Washington, calling the University's press release "grossly unfair, extremely damaging, and, to be blunt, just plain wrong in every conceivable sense."

The President of the University of Washington, Mark A. Emmert, politely refused to retract the press release, responding (in still another press release), that the researchers did not feel that the press release was inconsistent with their findings.

Today, Kids II Inc., a company that licenses the name "Baby Einstein," (the brand Disney was so worried about protecting from the "grossly unfair" academics at the University of Washington), recalled some "Baby Einstein" blocks because the paint contained "excessive levels of lead."

We truly, and without one hint of sarcasm, can't wait to hear what Robert A. Iger has to say about this.

Kids II Recalls Baby Einstein Color Blocks Due to Violation of Lead Paint Standard [CPSC]

PREVIOUSLY: Walt Disney Demands Retraction From University of Washington Over Baby Einstein Video Press Release
University Of Washington Stands Up To Disney, Will Not Retract "Baby Einstein" Press Release
Disney, Toys 'R Us To Begin Random Testing Of Toys

]]>
Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:42:44 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307351&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Various KB Toys Recalls Wooden Toys (lead), ... ]]> Various KB Toys Recalls Wooden Toys (lead), "Pirates of the Caribbean" Medallion Squeeze Lights (lead), Dollar General Frankenstein Tumblers (lead), "Totally Me!" Children's Decorating Sets (lead), Baby Einstein Discover & Play Color Blocks (lead), Dollar General metal keyrings (lead), Antioch Bookmarks and Journals (lead), Sports Authority Alpine Design Aluminum Water Bottles (lead).

]]>
Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:31:05 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307317&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Thomas & Friends Customers Sent Lead Tainted Toys As Apology For Lead Tainted Toys ]]> toad.jpgIf you returned a recalled Thomas & Friends toy to RC2, you probably received an apology and a "bonus gift." We hope you didn't give the toy to your kid, because some of the "bonus gifts" have been recalled for lead contamination.

RC2 sent an email out to customers who received the lead tainted apology toy:

Unfortunately, the discovery that certain Toad vehicles could be potentially unsafe was made in August, after Toads had been sent as bonus gifts to some families. Many of the Toad bonus gifts are safe, however some may not be. If you received a Toad vehicle as a bonus gift from us, please check its underside for the tracking code 1656OW00 to determine if it is one of the recalled toys.
That's pathetic. Maybe the apology toys for these ones will contain polio.

(Thanks, rwshep2000!)

]]>
Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:19:22 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=306219&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Man Who Discovered Tainted Toothpaste Located, Interviewed ]]> con_tubeoftoothpaste.jpg Sometimes being a conscientious shopper really does matter. The man who realized that tubes of discount toothpaste were tainted with diethylene glycol last May has been found and interviewed by the New York Times. Eduardo Arias, a 51-year-old government worker in Panama City, was shopping in a discount store one Saturday when he saw the toothpaste—he said he could read the ingredients list clearly without even picking up a tube, and when he saw "diethylene glycol" as an ingredient, alarms went off.

He bought a tube, and the next Monday he took a vacation day to bring it to a Health Ministry office. They directed him to a second office, naturally. They told him to take the toothpaste to a third office, and when he balked, they had him fill out a complaint form and leave the tube. Three days later, the story exploded when the country's top health official reported that a "shopper in Panama" had discovered the tainted product.

A year ago, those words would have meant nothing to him. "Nobody had ever heard of this stuff," Mr. Arias said. But a steady drumbeat of news about poison cough syrup had engraved the words in his mind.

"It was inconceivable to me that a known toxic substance that killed all these people could be openly on sale and that people would go on about their business calmly, selling and buying this stuff."


"The Everyman Who Exposed Tainted Toothpaste" [New York Times]
(Photo: Janmi)

]]>
Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:17:53 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=306139&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Media Roundup: What Should Parents Do About Recalled Toys? ]]> The toy recalls are still big news and something (the autumnal equinox, perhaps?) triggered an avalanche of "Oh, no! What should parents do?" advice stories from the media. Most, if not all, mentioned recalls.org,but you can also subscribe to Consumerist's "recalls" feed.

Here's a round up of advice:

The New York Times just ran around asking parents, bloggers and toy company owners about the issue:

Ms. Nemeth [who founded Discovery Toys in 1978 and sold the company to Avon a decade ago] said that if she had a toddler,"I'd avoid anything that is painted — I'd just wait until the industry shakes itself out." Besides, she said, "by bringing home wooden blocks that are unpainted, you're probably helping your child's creativity."

But plain wooden blocks alone probably will not satisfy most toddlers. Danielle Wiley, a 33-year-old publicist in Chicago, recalls a recent tantrum that her 2-year-old son, Max, had in the bathtub.

"I knew a new toy would help," Ms. Wiley said, but the only one in the house was a Fisher-Price Diego toy that had just been recalled for lead paint. Nevertheless, "I handed him the toy and he stopped," she said. After the bath, she said, she discarded the toy.


The Chicago Tribune is claiming that FAO Schwartz had a "country of origin" search feature on its website for those parents who feel that xenophobia is the answer to the crisis, though we can find no evidence of the feature actually existing aside from a mention of it on a Customer Service FAQ.

FAO Schwartz supposedly has country of origin labels in-store, but has no stores in Chicago:

If you're concerned about where toys are made, some retailers are helping customers find the product's origin. FAO Schwarz has put up signs throughout its stores to designate the country of origin; the retailer's Web site, http://www.fao .com, allows consumers to shop for toys by country of origin.

Kansas.com quotes one mom who is avoiding plastic (that the Thomas & Friends toys were wood seems not to matter):

"Anything that's plastic, we're just kind of staying away from," said Rachael Meza, a Wichita mom.

Forbes has some financial advice from Mattel. They're saying toy recalls aren't the biggest issue for their lagging earnings, it's really just a matter of uncool toys:
It could be that China is beside the point. The real risk in this company is its tired product lineup, says A.G. Edwards analyst Timothy A. Conder. He contends that stagnant sales of Barbie U.S. and American Girl and the difficulty replicating the Cars- and T.M.X. Elmo-related sales pop last year will hurt prospects.

WABC is optimistic:
"I feel this may well wind up being the safest holiday season of all," Toy Industry Association President Carter Keithley said.

Those are pretty confident words from the president of the Toy Industry Association following the recall of millions of toys from China due to lead paint.

Keithley just testified before a senate subcommittee. He says parents need to keep the 14 recalls from 11 companies in perspective.

"My first piece of advice is don't not freak out," he said.

WABC recommends the mythical FAO Shwatrz "country of origin" guides too. Since FAO Shwartz has 2 stores, this is extremely practical advice.

We think you should just buy your infant an XBOX. Ok, not really. You should hand craft all of your toys out of fallen tree branches and delicious organic free-trade coffee.

(Photo:Maulleigh)

]]>
Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:59:26 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=305301&view=rss&microfeed=true