<![CDATA[Consumerist: Bracelets]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Bracelets]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/bracelets http://consumerist.com/tag/bracelets <![CDATA[ Tiffany's Dazzling Customer Service More Than Makes Up For Shipping Snafu ]]> Free%20Tiffany%20Bracelet.jpgRitzy Fifth Avenue jeweler Tiffany & Co. failed to ship Chris' grandfather a bracelet for his wife in time for Christmas. We expect a certain level of service from high-end stores, but Tiffany's extravagant amends caught us by surprise.

My grandfather ordered an engraved Tiffany silver bracelet as a surprise Christmas gift for my grandmother. He had custom engraving put on the bracelet, and had arranged for the bracelet to be delivered to my house about 2 weeks before Christmas. Two weeks after the order (when we should've received the bracelet), there was no bracelet. We gave it another week, and the my grandfather emailed Tiffany customer support. He received an automated response stating that because of the overwhelming Christmas rush, he needed to contact customer support via their 800 number. Of course, the 800 number was impossible to get through to also.

My grandfather, being the laid back man that he is, wasn't really angry, but he wanted to know what was going on with the bracelet. Tiffany customer service ended up calling him on the Friday before Christmas. As luck would have it, he was out fishing, and my grandmother talked to them, thus ruining the surprise. When he returned home, he was able to actually get through to the rep who called him earlier. She informed him that because of a Christmas rush they were not expecting, the bracelet would not be arriving before Christmas. To make up for the fact that they had ruined the surprise and would not be getting the bracelet to my grandfather before Christmas, they would be giving him the order FREE. He asked to clarify, asking if they just meant the shipping or the engraving free, but no, the ENTIRE COST of the order was FREE. Of course, he was blown away (after all, this is a $255 bracelet, plus the cost of engraving and shipping).

Tiffany ended up shipping the bracelet on Saturday, overnighting it to my house where I received it on Monday. There was no invoice or such in the box, so we were still wondering IF the bracelet was actually going to be free (with the final call coming from the credit card bill). Sure enough, when the credit card bill came that would've contained the charge, there was absolutely no charges from Tiffany.

So, it's nice to know that there are indeed some companies who want to keep their reputation that treat their customers well.

Sometimes you get the service you intended to pay for. For Tiffany, which stocks $210,000 bracelets, $255 isn't much to keep the customer happy and willing to consider larger purchases.

]]>
Consumerist-351970 Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:11:57 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=351970&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Cancer Foundation Recalls 200,000 Bracelets Contaminated With Lead ]]> lead%20bracelet.pngThe Friends of Mel Foundation recalled 200,000 beaded bracelets contaminated with lead on news that a 9-year-old fell ill after putting the lead-ridden bracelet in his mouth. Proceeds from the bracelets generated over $1 million that went towards cancer research. From the Boston Globe:
Independent lab tests conducted on various bracelets by Massachusetts Materials Research Inc. showed that the multicolored beads in the Friends of Mel's bracelets contain no lead but that the small silver-toned rings connecting the beads have a high lead content. The beads are from China and Turkey and the small rings are from China, Herskovitz said.

Friends of Mel said the foundation was misled by a Chinese supplier, Ningbo Metal Manufacturing, which had promised in writing before signing a contract that the silver-toned rings did not contain lead. Ningbo could not be reached for comment late yesterday evening.

The circumstances surrounding the recall cast a dour light on a proposal from Consumer Product Safety Commission Acting Chair Nancy Nord to require a certification from importers vouching for the safety of goods brought into the country. We have previously questioned the efficacy of Commissioner Nord's proposal, wondering how any importer could reasonably make such a certification without either developing a massive oversight system, or trusting their foreign manufacturers. This recall shows yet again the dangers of relying solely on foreign assurances.

Friends of Mel has promised to replace all bracelets free of charge with "a lead-free product." They will also reimburse postage for anyone who wishes to mail their bracelet to:

The Friends of Mel Foundation
Post Office Box 1660
Wakefield, MA 01880
Charity recalling bracelets over lead [Boston Globe]

]]>
Consumerist-302728 Sat, 22 Sep 2007 22:40:25 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=302728&view=rss&microfeed=true