<![CDATA[Consumerist: Boycotts]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Boycotts]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/boycotts http://consumerist.com/tag/boycotts <![CDATA[ Christian Group Calls For Boycott Over Titillating New Starbucks Logo ]]> According to the Star Tribune, Starbucks recently decided to resurrect its original bare-breasted mermaid logo, much to the dismay of the Christian group, "The Resistance," who is calling for a national boycott. The logo, based on a 16th Century Norse woodcut, will be on Starbucks cups for at least a few more weeks and will be the permanent logo for Pike Place bags of coffee. According to the Christian group, the logo "has a naked woman on it with her legs spread like a prostitute," and that "the company might as well call themselves Slutbucks." We didn't even know that mermaids had legs. More, inside...

The article says,

The image is a less-revealing version of what the chain used for many years, starting when it first opened in Seattle in 1971. That original logo was resurrected in its Northwest outlets for a time in 2006 to mark the chain's 35th anniversary.

Company spokeswoman, Bridget Baker said the newly revived logo was "modified a bit [from the original] based on feedback" from Starbucks customers during its 2006 appearance. "We feel it's appropriate," she said. Howard Shultz, Starbucks' founder, said in his book, "That early siren, bare-breasted and Rubenesque, was supposed to be seductive as coffee itself."

We seriously doubt this logo is obscene enough to deter anyone from their morning cup. From what we know of coffee drinkers, still photos from German scheissen porn wouldn't separate them from their hot liquid crack.

Group finds Starbucks logo too hot to handle [Star Tribune]
(Photo: Star Tribune)

]]>
Fri, 16 May 2008 08:47:57 EDT Jay Slatkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5009309&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pizza Hut Delivery Driver Fired For Shooting Armed Robber ]]> pizzahutshooter.jpgA Pizza Hut delivery driver with a valid handgun permit has been fired after he shot an armed robber who put a gun to his head and demanded he turn over his cash. Now an Iowa state senator is calling for a boycott of Pizza Hut:
"You tell me any Iowan that was in his situation, that had a gun put to his head, how they would've reacted differently," state Sen. Brad Zaun of Urbandale said. "I think it's the wrong decision by Pizza Hut and I will not be buying any more Pizza Hut products."
Pizza Hut says it's against company policy for delivery drivers to carry guns, even with a valid permit.

"We're doing all that we can to help him with the transition," Pizza Hut spokesperson Chris Fuller told the Des Moines Register. The driver, James William Spiers III, was offered two months pay (without tips, naturally) and counseling in exchange for his resignation.

"I was terminated, but they're not going to kick me to the curb," he said Friday. "When they terminated me, I had asked if they could provide me with counseling. That's all I asked for."

The robbery suspect, 19-year-old Kenneth Jimmerson, was shot three times but is alive and "was arrested when he later called for medical help." He and another suspect (who is accused of calling in the pizza order), are both in the local county jail.

Pizza Hut delivers pink slip to employee held at gunpoint
[Des Moines Register] (Thanks, David!)

]]>
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:11:22 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382636&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ eBay Boycott Having An Effect? Listings Are Down 13% ]]> ebaylogosmall.jpgUSAToday says the eBay boycott over fee and policy changes has driven listings down as much as 13%:

Auction listings on eBay.com dropped some 13% since the strike started Feb. 18 to about 13 million items, according to third-party tracking sites such as dealscart.com and medved.net.

The boycott, amid slowing growth and intensifying competition from Amazon and Google, could presage a challenging year for John Donahoe, eBay's incoming CEO, say analysts.

Like dozens of other boycotts against eBay the past few years, this protest is largely over pricing changes. Though many previous boycotts have fizzled after a few days, the most recent gained more attention through protest-related actions on YouTube and MySpace.

"If (eBay's listings total) falls below 12 million, we've made a pretty good impact," said Nancy Baughman, an eBay PowerSeller who deals antiques and collectibles. She is also co-author of a book on online auctions.

eBay held a special promotion that drove listings up temporarily at the beginning of the boycott, but it may not have been enough to compensate for the backlash. eBay says the fee and policy changes, which include barring sellers from leaving neutral or negative feedback on buyers, will stand.

Online auction listings down 13% in boycott of eBay [USAToday]

]]>
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:38:44 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=360546&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Great eBay Boycott Is Officially On, Will Anyone Notice? ]]> ebaylogosmall.jpgHere we are a few days into a week-long eBay boycott over policy and fee changes and no one is sure if it is having any effect. It appears that listings are down 3%, but no one is sure if the drop is the result of the boycott.

eBay's spokesperson told CNNMoney that the boycott "hasn't had an impact on our listings."

Some boycott supporters are hopeful, however:

"If [eBay's listings total] falls below 12 million we've made a pretty good impact," said Nancy Baughman, an eBay PowerSeller who deals antiques and co-authored Buy It, Sell It, Make Money, a guide to doing business on eBay. "I'm hoping that it goes down below 10 million. If that happens, we will have made a huge impact."
eBay says that it's sticking with its changes — including a hotly contested decision to prevent sellers from leaving negative or neutral feedback about buyers.

EBay boycott begins, to uncertain effect [CNNMoney]

]]>
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:37:05 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358731&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ BoycottZales.Com: Diamonds Are For Never ]]>

Over at Boycottzales.com, customers share horror stories of dealings with the jewelry store that bespotts many a suburban mall. The tales include allegations of Mr. Clean being used to spruce up jewelry, minorities being paid more than Caucasians, and engagement rings going in for repairs and never coming out.

Not three weeks into having the site up, the site's proprietor, Barry, received a cease and desist letter from a Zales attorney. The letter accuses Barry of trademark infringement and defamation.

We're no lawyers but we're pretty sure Zales has no case, the site's disclaimer fairly shields them from the legal threats, and Zales should go stuff it in their coal mine. Check it out and decide for yourself, after the jump...

This is an excerpt Barry received on June 3, 2006 from the law firm of GONZALEZ, SAGIO & HARLAN, L.L.P:

We note that you have created and maintained a website entitled "BoycottZales.com." You are hereby instructed to immediately cease and desist from maintaining this website. As we indicated to you earlier, we believe that maintaining the same infringes upon Zales' trademark rights. This will not be tolerated. If you do not cease and desist, I will advise my client to seek to protect its business interest accordingly.

Furthermore, several of the statements made on your website relating to certain Zales employees and stores are incorrect and rise to the level of defamation. Defamation occurs when an individual makes a false statement that is communicated in writing or speech to a person other than the person defamed that is unprivileged and tends to harm that person's reputation so as to lower that person's esteem in the community or to deter third parties from associating or dealing with that person. The comments made on your website clearly fall within the purview of this definition. If you do not cease and desist, I will advise my client to protect its interest with regard to this as well.

What do you think? Any advice for Barry? Zales: hot or not?

]]>
Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:21:02 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=178783&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pith & Vinegar: The Spinning of the Chum ]]> shark.jpg• If you think diamonds are for never, visit boycottzales.com.
• Remember that friendly PR rep who said she would help intervene to resolve this kid's Paypal misery? Well, he writes it's been over a week and jack doody has been done.
• TiVo won't kill ads, they're too busy planning to kill TiVo, or at least manipulate it for their own fell purposes. [OneSecondTheater]
• Old news but we didn't talk about it yet: Telcos secretly funding anti-net-neutrality websites. Probably made by the same ad agency who did the pro-C02 spot. [Digg]

]]>
Wed, 31 May 2006 20:13:02 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=177518&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ All-Star Rants Showcase: Boycott Boycotts ]]> While we're riding Metafilter like the magical pony on a journey to its navel that it is, let's extract this bit of fried gold and take it along for the ride. In response to a fan of The Family Guy, outraged about Fox's scheduling problems and proposes a boycott, Lore Sjoberg writes:
I'm already boycotting my cable company. Can I, you know, sub-boycott? Or do I have to end my boycott of Comcast so that I can get Family Guy and not watch it?

How about if I refuse to download it via BitTorrent, which is easy enough given that I don't use BitTorrent. Unless BitTorrent pisses me off, in which case I'll have to start using BitTorrent so that I can stop using it, which means I won't be able to refuse to use BitTorrent to download Family Guy, because I'll already be refusing to use it for its own sake.

I suppose I could go ahead and get busy not downloading Family Guy now. At my current download rate, I should be able to not download the entire series in about a week. I could avoid downloading them even faster, but I'm boycotting the company that I was considering getting a T1 from if I ever made enough money.

However, I should check their Web site. Maybe they've reformed and I can go from boycotting them to simply not being able to afford them, in which case I should be able to not get it installed in a couple days if I don't order their express service, and assuming the lack of install goes smoothly — and I'll boycott them if it doesn't — then I should be able to not download Family Guy by not using BitTorrent while I'm asleep, if I wasn't boycotting The Sleep Number guys.

]]>
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:22:39 EST consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=142439&view=rss&microfeed=true