<![CDATA[Consumerist: bloomingdales]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: bloomingdales]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/bloomingdales http://consumerist.com/tag/bloomingdales <![CDATA[ Get Your Expired Bloomingdale's Gift Card Balance Restored ]]> Pam had a Bloomingdale's gift card that went unused for a couple of years, and when she tried to spend it last weekend, she was told it had expired. Pam found a way to get the balance restored fairly quickly, though. If you've got a card from before February 2008, try Pam's advice below.

This past weekend, I went to Bloomingdales with a gift card that I received two years ago. The salesperson told me it had "expired." I was furious. How could a gift card "expire" after such a short time? How could they take "my" money?

I searched Bloomingdales.com, and learned that gift cards purchased after Feb. 2008 never expire.

That didn't comfort me. Then I sent an email to Customer Service. Lo and behold: they replied with a phone number to call to "restore" the balance in my expired card:

1-866-593-2540

A minute and one phone call later, I have the full $109 back on my card.

It's interesting how no one at the store was willing or able to give me this information — and how there's no directions about it on Bloomingdales.com.

]]>
Consumerist-5057308 Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:26:36 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5057308&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Bloomingdale's Sends You To A "Collection Agency" Over $5.00 ]]> Reader Haven accidentally underpaid a Bloomingdale's credit card bill by $5, and so it was off to the collection agency...

Haven writes (to Bloomingdale's):

May 27, 2008

Bloomingdale's
Customer Service
P.O. Box 8215
Mason, OH 45040

Dear Bloomingdale's Customer Service Department,

I have been a Bloomingdale's card holder for about two years. In my time as a cardholder, I have spent close to $2000.00 at your store. Recently, I paid a bill online and because I didn't have the bill in front of me, paid what I thought was due that month. To my error I had underpaid the minimum amount by $5.00. Two days ago, I received a notice from Bloomingdale's (the first and, apparently, last notice I was to receive) saying I would be sent to collections for failing to pay this $5.00 – I thought this was odd as I had used my Bloomingdale's card in the store about a week and a half prior. If my account had been in bad standing I would assume Bloomingdale's would put it on hold and not allow me to complete my purchase. At the very least I expected to receive timely notice of the pending sale of my account to a collection agency, so that I could have a chance to fix the problem. Although I did receive "notice" from Bloomingdale's, it appears this served only to let me know that I could expect to deal with a collection agency, and have no chance to rectify the situation with Bloomingdale's. Yesterday (on a Sunday over Memorial Day Weekend of all times!) I had the pleasure of getting four calls from your collection agency MCCS. How a customer who has spent a considerable amount in your store could be treated in this manner over a sum of $5.00 is appalling. I was not aware that I owed $5.00, and if Bloomingdale's had taken the time to notify me of this small error I would have happily paid it.

To think that Bloomingdale's is spending time notifying collections and using MCCS manpower for multiple hours over such a small amount of money is completely illogical. The cost to do this I'm sure is well over $5.00 and totally inefficient. To bully me by potentially negatively impacting my credit standing over something so small is a bad business practice and completely ridiculous. You have lost a customer who until now was a supporter of your store and I will be mentioning this to other customers of your Company's bullying tactics.

Sincerely,
H.

Ugh. It's completely unreasonable of Bloomingdale's to send your account to collections without giving you proper notice and a chance to fix the error. And into the open arms of Nordstrom you go...

MCSS is actually the collection wing of Macy's. Still, calling themselves MCSS rather than Bloomingdale's makes them sound like a scary collection agency, so it's understandable why there was that confusion, a confusion that Bloomie's/MCSS capitalizes on to get people to pay up. We don't know about you, but in all the times we've ever been behind on a bill, we would just get another bill. It would be months before we start getting calls from places with acronym names. Even if H is overacting, Bloomie's response to the $5 under-payment seems overblown.

(Photo: nfarley )

]]>
Consumerist-5011355 Wed, 28 May 2008 11:49:44 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5011355&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Bloomingdales Employee Charged In Bogus Gift Card Scam ]]> bloomindales.jpgThe Manhattan District Attorney's office is prosecuting a Bloomingdale's salesperson for running a month-long bogus gift card scam that netted $34,515 from the store, says the NY Sun.
It says Bloomingdale's sales receipts were the key element of Ms. Ng's alleged scheme.

After a shopper made a purchase, she would regenerate the receipt. She would then make phony merchandise returns and use the credit to create the gift cards, according to the complaint. Between September 26 and October 3, Ms. Ng is said to have used 36 separate sales receipts to create the fraudulent cards.

A loss prevention officer at Bloomingdale's informed police of Ms. Ng's scam, and she was arrested on November 7. At the time of her arrest, police found six of the gift cards in Ms. Ng's wallet, according to the complaint.

Ms. Ng was charged with a series of crimes at her arraignment the following day, including third-degree grand larceny and second-degree forgery, an official at the Manhattan district attorney's office said.

The dishonest employee could get seven years in prison for the scheme. We wonder if this person was a shopping addict like this lady.

Bloomingdale's Saleswoman Is Prosecuted [NY Sun]
(Photo:scalleja)

]]>
Consumerist-336977 Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:19:02 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336977&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 6 Major Retailers Selling Real Fur As "Faux" ]]> Six big retailers are selling jackets advertised as having "faux" fur, but the fur is actually from real animals. It's not only mean, it's a violation of the federal Fur Products Labeling Act. An investigation by the Humane Society of The United States * found jackets sold at Saks, Neiman Marcus, Lord & Taylor, Dillards, Yoox and Bloomingdales containing the faux "faux" fur. Much of the world's fur is processed in China, a place where they skin animals alive for their fur.

Holiday Shoppers Beware: Six Major Retailers Selling Real Fur as Faux [Humane Society Of The United States] (* note: this is a different group than your local animal shelter)

]]>
Consumerist-336251 Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:19:38 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336251&view=rss&microfeed=true