<![CDATA[Consumerist: Blockbuster]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Blockbuster]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/blockbuster http://consumerist.com/tag/blockbuster <![CDATA[ Something we noticed while looking up info ... ]]> Something we noticed while looking up info on Blockbuster.com today: the $25 cash back promo they've got going with PayPal is still being promoted on the front page of their site, but the fine print says it expired on August 31st. You probably shouldn't take advantage of that "offer" until Blockbuster clears up the expiration question.

]]>
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:57:40 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048223&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Double Dips In PayPal Account; Naturally, PayPal Does Nothing ]]> Blockbuster debited Anthony's PayPal account two days in a row for the same monthly plan. PayPal won't help—they say it's between Blockbuster and Anthony, offering further proof that PayPal is a great service only as long as nothing goes wrong.

Anthony writes:

Called both Blockbuster and PayPal this morning and of course one pointed the finger at the other for the double subscription charge. So here I am with two charges and no way to resolve the issue since Blockbuster does not see both charges in their system and PayPal says I need to contact Blockbuster for resolution.


[Note: we edited the above screenshot for space, but we did not remove any figures.]

Has anyone else had this problem with Blockbuster's PayPal account agreement? It's a small amount in this case, but that's only because Anthony's plan is the cheapest Blockbuster offers; they charged him the full subscription fee both times.

]]>
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:51:03 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048218&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Yikes: Blockbuster Dumps Plan To Buy Circuit City ]]> Blockbuster has finished snooping around Circuit City's medicine cabinet and the verdict is in: Blockbuster has changed its mind.

Here's their official statement:

"Based on market conditions and the completion of our initial due diligence process, we have determined that it is not in the best interest of Blockbuster's shareholders to proceed with an acquisition of Circuit City," said Jim Keyes, Blockbuster Chairman and CEO. "We continue to believe in the strategic merits of a consumer retail proposition that would bring media content and electronic devices together under one brand. We will pursue this strategy through our Blockbuster stores as a way to diversify the business and better serve the entertainment retail segment."

Whatever Circuit City's got, Blockbuster doesn't want to catch it.


Blockbuster Withdraws Proposal To Acquire Circuit City
[Blockbuster]
(Photo: Maulleigh )

]]>
Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:11:59 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5021633&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Netflix Profiles To Stay! ]]> Netflix announced today that they will not be removing the beloved profiles function that let users set up separate movie queues. Hooray! Speaking from personal experience, when two people share one netflix account, having two queues is essential to maintaining domestic tranquility. Looks like they listened to the 1270 people who left comments on the blog post announcing the feature's removal. An email to subscribers also thanked them for the customer emails and calls that advocated for keeping the profiles. The news was released on the Netflix community blog by one of the Netflix website production managers. Full announcement, inside...

For users of Profiles, I have good news to report: we will keep the feature with no plans to discontinue it.

We were persuaded by the well-reasoned, sincere responses of loyal members who very much value this feature. As someone who enjoys helping his four-year-old daughter manage her one-DVD-at-a-time, G-rated sub-account, I identified with these thoughtful pleas to maintain Profiles.

Because of an ongoing desire to make our website easier to use, we believed taking a feature away that is only used by a very small minority would help us improve the site for everyone. Listening to our members, we realized that users of this feature often describe it as an essential part of their Netflix experience. Simplicity is only one virtue and it can certainly be outweighed by utility.

As for improving Profiles, there are no definite plans in place yet, but, like everything at Netflix, we seek to make it better and we are open to suggestions. Non-users of the feature and new members will be able to access Profiles in 2-3 weeks. Existing users will be able to continue their use, uninterrupted.

We apologize for any inconvenience the previous announcement caused.

Enjoy.

-Todd

Emails from Consumerist readers sharing the good news hit our mailbox moments after the news was released. Here's how some of our readers are reacting:

Rick: "Sounds like Netflix got the message. Personally, I never used profiles, but it's nice to see that they are willing to say, OK, we made you mad, so we're going to make things right. I like the tone of this message — not too sappy, silly, or over-apologetic. Most companies insult your intelligence one way or another with their apologies."

Sonya: "Yay!"

Keith: "Netflix does take us seriously :)"

Di: "I wonder how many people have already sold thier soul to Blockbuster over this. Oh well."

Steven: "We win I guess!"

Profiles feature NOT going away [Netflix Community Blog] (Thanks to everyone who sent this in!)
PREVIOUSLY: Netflix Eliminates User Profiles, Infuriates Customers
(Photo: Maulleigh)

]]>
Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:53:55 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5020844&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Netflix Eliminates User Profiles, Infuriates Customers ]]> Netlfix announced yesterday that they'll be eliminating the ability to set up separate queues or "profiles" within one account. Some customers, like reader Stephen are hopping mad about it.

Incredible shrinking service. Every single person I know uses Netflix uses profiles. For those out there who don't, you can create profiles for different people using the same account, and allow those people to maintain their own list of movies. For example, I get two discs at a time from my queue, my wife gets one at a time from hers, but we pay for just one 3-disc at a time account.

I called Netflix to tell them that if they do this, I will cancel service with them - I made it clear to the poor guy that answered the phone I wasn't going to yell at him, I just wanted to lodge my protest. It seems he's taken LOTS of such calls. He told me to log into my account, click on the Contact Us link, and go to Suggestions and put the information in there. Apparently that page sends information to the correct people. I certainly hope every Consumerist reader who is a Netflix user does just that. Netflix has been one of the better companies I've dealt with, and I believe that if their userbase tells them "no, you are being dumb, stop it", they just might. This also might be the point where they have realized they have Blockbuster just about beat and are starting to abuse their customers. I hope not, because I'd rather they not let Blockbuster up off the mat.

Here's the email Neflix sent out, announcing the discontinuation of profiles:

Important News Regarding Netflix Profiles

Dear ,

We wanted to let you know we will be eliminating Profiles, the feature that allowed you to set up separate DVD Queues under one account, effective September 1, 2008.

Each additional Profile Queue will be unavailable after September 1, 2008. Before then, we recommend you consolidate any of your Profile Queues to your main account Queue or print them out.

While it may be disappointing to see Profiles go away, this change will help us continue to improve the Netflix website for all our customers.

If you have any questions, please go to http://www.netflix.com/Help?p_faqid=3962 or call us anytime at 1 (888) 638-3549. We apologize for any inconvenience.

- The Netflix Team

The ability to have "his and hers", or a kids queue, is pretty essential to the Netflix service for some people. However, according to Netflix's FAQ, they will be emailing people a copy of their queues so they can rebuild their selections. Will this drive you back to the arms of Blockbuster?

]]>
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:29:46 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5017887&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Does The World Need A Blockbuster Digital Download "ATM?" ]]> At their shareholders meeting Wednesday, Blockbuster announced that they would soon begin testing a "ATM"-style machine that consumers could use to download movies "on the go."

The Associated Press says:

The design, which [CEO] Keyes said is likely to change with testing, offers a range of features to help customers make movie choices, including previews and recommendations. Keyes said the company is working to reduce the download time for movies to about 30 seconds.

At first the system will only be compatible with the an Archos portable device, but will eventually be an "open system," able to recognize a wide variety of devices. Blockbuster says that even if they don't manage to acquire Circuit City, "transforming" their stores with these movie ATMs is their goal.

"With or without Circuit City's acquisition, we think we have a terrific opportunity to transform our stores," Keyes said. Blockbusters' presentation also included mock-ups of small movie download kiosks for other locations such as airports.

Will a digital download kiosk save Blockbuster? Or are you perfectly content with Netflix and their new box?

Blockbuster unveils in-store kiosk prototype [AP]
Blockbuster Annual Meeting Presentation [Blockbuster]

]]>
Thu, 29 May 2008 13:12:52 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5011646&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Policy: Blockbuster Debits $1 To Test Your Card, Then Charges You For Your Rental ]]> For every debit or credit card transaction at Blockbuster, the company will now debit $1 to "test" your card. If the transaction goes through, they'll then debit the full amount of your purchase. Blockbuster tells us your dollar will be returned in 3-10 business days. Reader Jason says he rented a game on Thursday and hasn't gotten the dollar Blockbuster borrowed back yet. Will he get it before the 10 days is up?

Jason writes:

On Thursday I went to Blockbuster and rented a videogame for 8.47$. The next day I checked my online statement to find out that I was charged 8.47$, and then another separate transaction from Blockbuster for 1$. Considering the guy behind the counter had no idea what he was doing at the time I figured he made a mistake and called the Blockbuster back to investigate. They informed me that it is a relatively new policy on all in-store rentals for debit/credit cards in which before charging you the rental for the game, they first bill your card $1 to make sure that it is active, then they bill the rental in addition to that. The manager I spoke to said that they refund the $1 at a later date, but here I am almost a week later with no refund. If this is even legal, why not just charge the $1, and if it works, charge the normal rental price subtract the $1?

Ugh.

(Photo: Seth W )

]]>
Wed, 21 May 2008 14:58:36 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5010265&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Step Back In Time To The Blockbuster Living Museum ]]> Before the days of Netflix and the internet there was the "video store." According to The Onion, Blockbuster was "a specialty shop where customers would exchange money for the short term use of videos in an archaic system called "renting." Now we can visit the Blockbuster Living Museum to relive those days of yore. Watch The Onion video, inside...

What's so poignant about this time is the uncertainty. When you get to Blockbuster are they going to have your video? Did someone else rent it? Is there going to be a line? Are the alarms going to sound when you walk out the front door? It was very difficult for the people that lived during this era.

Difficult indeed.

Historic ‘Blockbuster’ Store Offers Glimpse Of How Movies Were Rented In The Past [The Onion]

]]>
Fri, 16 May 2008 18:17:21 EDT Jay Slatkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5009411&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster + Circuit City = "Exclusive Content and Content-Enabled Devices" ]]> Blockbuster has recently drawn the ire of movie enthusiasts by inking "exclusive" rental deals with the likes of IFC. The upshot of this deal is that Blockbuster will retain the exclusive physical rental distribution rights for IFC titles for three years after each street date. Why is this important? Because Blockbuster CEO Jim Keyes wants to buy Circuit City for the following reason:

"The combination of Blockbuster and Circuit City will result in an $18 billion retail enterprise uniquely positioned for the convergence of media content and electronic devices," Keyes wrote. "We would seek to differentiate products in both Blockbuster and Circuit City stores by offering exclusive content and content-enabled devices.

Circuit City was initially unwilling to talk to Blockbuster, but today CNNMoney said that Circuit City has agreed to open its books:

"We are pleased to have reached an agreement with Circuit City to conduct due diligence and further explore a possible merger between our two companies," said Blockbuster's management in statement Friday. "We continue to believe this combination would create significant cost and operating synergies therefore unlocking substantial value for our shareholders."

We have to ask you... are you interested in "exclusive content and content-enabled devices" from Circuit City?

Circuit City opens books to Blockbuster [CNNMoney]
(Photo: northernplateguy )

]]>
Fri, 09 May 2008 16:35:04 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5008463&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Woman Sues Blockbuster For Telling All Her Facebook Friends What She Was Renting ]]> facebooklogo.jpgFacebook's Beacon has finally resulted in a lawsuit. A Texas woman has sued Blockbuster for participating in Beacon, claiming that "Blockbuster violated the federal Videotape Privacy Protection Act by sharing information about her movie rentals and sales with Facebook without first obtaining her written consent," says MediaPost.

She's seeking class action status, with $2,500 for each violation of the statute. MediaPost says the law was passed in 1988 when a newspaper obtained the rental history of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork.

What about you? Did Facebook tell all your friends that you rented Basic Instinct 2... again?

Blockbuster Sued For Participating In Facebook Beacon [MediaPost]

]]>
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:24:50 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381173&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Cancels Your Membership If You Demand A Refund On Unplayable Rentals ]]> con_blockbustersavings.jpgAndrew is having some trouble with Blockbuster: the 360 and Wii games he rented were unplayable, and the store manager refused to refund his debit card or apply the cost of the unused rentals to a purchase, saying "It's not store policy." She even tried to upsell Anrew to their Game Plan, saying, "Five bucks additional wouldn't have killed you, with what you spent on the games previously." What? He finally convinced her to credit his debit account—"however, she terminated my ability to rent games from the store" as a consequence. Andrew, don't you understand? Blockbuster needs that money if they're ever going to buy Circuit City. Here's Andrew's story:

I've been a regular personage at a Blockbuster in Mishawaka, IN for some time. Just recently I moved into a new house, so I was rather excited to know that your store was within walking distance to rent movies. Not having a car, this meant plenty of rentals of video game software for my 360 and Wii.
 
However, just recently I rented Halo 3, and when I brought it home, it was cracked. They graciously replaced it with a "free rental", so I went to another one of your stores and rented Halo 3 there. I returned it on time, and proceeded to rent Rainbow Six Vegas 2, and Oblivion, both for the 360 again. When I got it home, neither worked. When I opened my 360 Oblivion had a scratch on it, which 360's are known to do. Rainbow Six's disc looked just fine. It however wouldn't load. When I called your store that night because it was already too late to head back over, they told me they'd grant me a "free rental" and return the games for replacements. Now here's where the problem begins.
 
I went over just a few minutes ago, and brought the games in, and told them what was going on. When I couldn't find anything else to rent and asked for my money back, even though I'd rented the games on my debit card, the manager (Adrian I believe) told me "It's not store policy." I asked if I could put the money toward purchasing a product (a used copy of Halo 3, for 39.99), and she told me she couldn't allow that either because it wasn't store policy. I had my receipt from the rentals, that clearly said debit card, and she still wouldn't put the $17.10 toward the purchase.
 
She finally refunded the money, however, she terminated my ability to rent games from the store.
 
They also tried selling me on their "Game plan" which means you get unlimited replacements for ONE game for 20 some odd dollars and said "Five bucks additional wouldn't have killed you, with what you spent on the games previously."
(Photo: Getty) ]]>
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:49:37 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=379721&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster has offered to buy Circuit City ... ]]> con_tinycircuitcitylogo.jpgBlockbuster has offered to buy Circuit City for a little over $1 billion, with the goal of creating "a chain that could sell portable devices and entertainment for them, much like Apple Inc.'s stores." [Chicago Tribune] (Thanks to everyone who sent this in!)

]]>
Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:04:30 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=379462&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Round 22: American Airlines vs Blockbuster ]]> This is Round 22 in our Worst Company in America contest, American Airlines vs Blockbuster.

American Airlines: canceled 3,300 flights last week to make sure some wires were properly wrapped and tied, disrupting travel plans for hundreds of thousands of travelers. Granted, their lives would have been much more disrupted had any of their planes caught fire, but as this repair was on the FAA top list of things to check for, it should have been part of routine maintenance. That aside, American was the most-complained about of the big airlines for the past year, ranking in the tops for complaints about customer service and overall flight problems.

Blockbuster: is a crappy video store dittoed across the face of America. The worst thing about them is that they never have any movies that we like and sometimes they edit controversial movies to make them more mainstream-friendly. And based on reports from our readers, some of their in-store personnel seem to have discs stuck up their bum.

This is a post in our Worst Company In America 2008 series. The companies nominated for this honor were chosen by you, the readers. Keep track of all the goings on at consumerist.com/tag/worst-company-in-america/

STILL OPEN FOR VOTING: Time Warner Cable vs Radioshack, Wellpoint vs Charter Cable, Dell vs Home Depot,
Sears vs Citibank, Wal-Mart vs TJMaxx, Mattel vs ATT, Capital One vs Video Professor, eBay/Paypal vs COX, Apple vs SallieMae, Diebold Vs Pfizer, MTV vs TransUnion, CompUSA vs DirecTV
Target vs Best Buy
Allstate vs Verizon,
DeBeers vs 1800 flowers, Starbucks vs United Airlines,
Exxon vs Crocs, Google Vs Sony, Ticketmaster vs Wachovia, Facebook vs The American Arbitration Association, Comcast vs Menu Foods

]]>
Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:00:00 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=379389&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Running Low On In-Store Exchanges Under Your Total Access Plan? Try Visiting A Different Blockbuster Location ]]> Hacking Netflix reports that many Blockbuster locations don't use a centralized network to keep tabs on Total Access usage. The tip was originally reported by Kevin Tostado, who took down his post after a ball-busting conversation with Blockbuster in which they asked him to cease and desist. Fortunately, Google's marvelously efficient spiders reached Kevin's site before Blockbuster and preserved the post.

Here's what he wrote:

Well, after I had blown through my 5 free in-store exchanges by mid-March (on the bottom of your Blockbuster receipt it tracks how many in-store exchanges you've done this month), I decided to see what happens if I go in and try a get 6th in-store exchange. Well, as to be presumed, I didn't get a free exchange, but the online movie did serve as a $3.00 coupon off the price of the rental ($4.99 movie), which just further confused me. Apparently, buried in their FAQs it says "If the pre-determined number of free in-store exchanges is met during the calendar month, you have the ability to exchange your Online DVDs for discounted movie rentals for the remainder of the month." The bummer is it doesn't mention how much of a discount it is. For a .99 rental, is there even a discount?

In the process of trying to figure out the limits of the system, I realized that different Blockbuster stores are keeping track of the in-store exchanges separately. Yes, that's right. After getting my free 5 in-store exchanges at one store, I simply took my next 5 online movies to another nearby Blockbuster and was able to get another 5 in-store exchanges during the same month.

Before dashing out to exchange your DVDs, be warned: Blockbuster is threatening vengeance on anyone who takes advantage their apparently lax oversight:
Blockbuster tracks whether individuals are abusing their online subscription plan and "gaming" the system to exceed the number of in-store exchanges they are allowed per month.

If an online subscriber tries to circumvent the terms of their plan, and in this instance gain more free rentals than allowed, we'll know and ask them to stop if they want to remain an online subscriber, just as we're doing with Kevin.

Make of this what you will.

Blockbuster Total Access Extra Movie Hack? [Hacking Netflix]
Blockbuster Warns Against "Gaming the System" [Hacking Netflix]
(Photo: Knowzy) (Thanks to Jeff!)

]]>
Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:35:30 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376576&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Cancels Your Account, Will Let You Have It Back If You Pay $18 More ]]>

Long time reader, first time tipper. I'm sure you've heard plenty about Blockbuster and their shady Total Access dealings, but I thought I'd send along my experience with them.

My girlfriend and I have been using the service for a few years now, almost since day-one, and while it was pretty easy going for the first year or so, things started to get strange last summer. Her account was inexplicably put on hold when she had to change her debit card number. The CSRs told us that it was going to be a week or two to authenticate the new card, but months went by and nothing changed.

Then, a month ago, out of the blue, two DVDs showed up in our mail and the service was reinstated. No explanation, no nothing, but there was a nice debit from her account in the form of $16.99. We took the mailers into the local branch, got them replaced with a couple more movies, and it looked like everything was back to normal.

Then today, she checked her Q to see if the next movies had shipped - they had not. She checked My Account, and sure enough, the account was cancelled, and the only option open to her was to re-subscribe. I wondered if it was just a glitch because of the old debit card issue. I logged into her account to re-sign up, and I'm presented with the new options. (see the photo below) Just notice our current plan, and those not available to us.

Our $16.99 account will now run us back $34.99. A $18 price bump. Or we can stay at the same price-level, and get a crippled in-store exchange program (which for us was the main advantage of going over to Netflix). What a great way to treat a couple of loyal customers.

Thanks Blockbuster, but I don't know if we're going to take you up on the new offer, or the Mario-Kart pre-order offer either.

Thanks for listening Consumerist. Keep fighting the good fight.

Yeah, we'd pass if we were you. There are other fish in the sea. ]]>
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:27:32 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373118&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ IFC Seals Devilish Pact With Blockbuster ]]> IFC has inked a "devilish" multi-year exclusive distribution deal with Blockbuster, says Chicago Sun-Times blogger and editor of RogerEbert.com, Jim Emerson.

From IFC/Blockbuster's press release:

Under the terms of the agreement, IFC and Blockbuster will share rental revenues from IFC titles. Blockbuster will have an exclusive 60-day rental window, including both the physical and digital rental distribution channels, for each title as it becomes available. During this period no title will be available on a retail basis in any format. After the 60-day period, the IFC titles will be available on a non-exclusive basis both for retail and digital distribution. However, Blockbuster will retain the exclusive physical rental distribution rights for IFC titles for three years after each street date.

Considering Blockbusters' draconian NC-17 policy, the retailer seems like an odd choice for IFC, says Emerson:

If you were to check into the availability of films on DVD at Blockbuster Online, among the titles you will not find are "Crash" (David Cronenberg,1997), "Beyond the Valley of the Dolls" (Russ Meyer, 1970 — screenplay by Roger Ebert), or "This Film Is Not Yet Rated" (Kirby Dick, 2006), an IFC Films release. They're not even listed, because they were rated NC-17 and Blockbuster will not make such films available through their stores or online service. (See David Edelstein's article, "Blame Blockbuster, not the MPAA.)

You will also not find the theatrical releases of Ang Lee's "Lust, Caution," Takeshi Miike's "Audition," John Waters' "A Dirty Shame," Peter Jackson's "Dead-Alive," Bernardo Bertolucci's "The Dreamers," Abel Ferrara's "The Bad Lieutenant" and many other films that are only available in cut versions (in some cases heavily cut versions) that have been re-submitted to the MPAA for an R rating just so they could make it onto Blockbuster's shelves during their first few months of release. You tell me if 2001's "L.I.E.," directed by Michael Cuesta ("Six Feet Under," "Dexter"), starring Paul Dano and Brian Cox, is available from Blockbuster Online. There's no box art, no description, no credits info, but there's a page for it here.

Does IFC think its core audience doesn't care about the integrity (or lack thereof) with which a company like Blockbuster treats the movies it rents and sells? I mean, if they don't, who does? You'd think the core IFC constituency would be precisely the "movie consumers" who, in principle, would not patronize a place like Blockbuster, any more than they would order a Domino's pizza.

A joint-press release from Blockbuster and IFC is strikingly hilarious:
"We're delighted to join with BLOCKBUSTER as we continue our mission of making independent film available to the widest possible audience," said Lisa Schwartz, IFC's senior vice president of sales and business development.
Yes, because exclusivity agreements always make things available to a wider audience. Oh wait, maybe she was calling Blockbuster members fat. That's just rude and uncalled for.

Is Blockbuster trying to start a Netflix/Blockbuster format war?

IFC signs pact with devil Blockbuster [Scanners Blog]
IFC Entertainment and BLOCKBUSTER Sign Two-Year Exclusive Rental Deal (Press Release) [Yahoo!]
(Photo:medialian1)

]]>
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:07:58 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=366494&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Why Blockbuster Will Never Survive" ]]> Reader and commenter Salviati writes in to share his personal experience with Blockbuster and his theory for why they will never survive fierce competition from Netflix and the new Apple video rentals.

I am writing to explain why I am no longer a Blockbuster Total Access subscriber and never will be again. Service wasn't always so deplorable at Blockbuster, but in the last several months I have had three very negative experiences with the chain that has caused me to turn from a Blockbuster evangelist, who persuaded my parents and friends to join the Total Access plan, to a disgruntled consumer who won't step into a Blockbuster until they've reformed their customer service attitude.

Keep in mind, I was an easy customer. I auto-paid my monthly bill. I held my movies for weeks and months on end without mailing them back or taking them back to the store for exchanges. I even went for a period of 6.5 months without exchanging my movies (While being charged $17.99 all the while). In the past year I was with Blockbuster, I exchanged only 11 movies in-store. I was as profitable as they could get. But between August and today, I have had three incidences which have convinced me that Blockbuster managers are (1)Incompetent (2)Powerless and (3)Apathetic.


Incident 1: I had exchanged out a set of 3 movies in-store in August. After keeping them out past their initial due date I was billed the price of the movies which is in-line with their policy. As long as they are returned within 30 days, Blockbuster is supposed to refund the charge minus a $1.25 processing fee. However, I got called out-of-town on a business trip, and I left before being able to return the movies. Once I realized the situation, I called my local store and asked if it was necessary to have my wife return the movies while I was gone, or if I could wait a week and return them myself. His answer was that it wouldn't be a problem for me to return the movies after 30 days, but I would be charged the $1.25 fee per movie. Great, I thought, until I got back home. When I tried to return the movies (32 days past their due date), I was told that it was impossible to return the movies, and that I'd have to pay the ridiculously marked-up used price of $40 for the three (the price at Target for all three new was $21). The manager simply wouldn't acknowledge that one of their employees had mis-informed me about my ability to return the movies. I tried to call their corporate customer service, who could only refer me to the district manager. To cut this long story short, I spent 3 weeks calling between the store manager and district manager trying to simply refund the movies, which they still sold on their Used racks. I was repeatedly told it was "Impossible" and "the computer won't allow it". I know the time I spent trying to return the movies was worth more than $40, but I felt like I was being wronged, and didn't want to let the issue go. I finally caved when I received a threatening Credit Agency letter. I thought about writing this letter to The Consumerist back then, but I figured it was partially my fault, even though I thought Blockbuster did a terrible Customer Service job.


Incident 2: This one was much shorter. Me, my wife, and her friend walking into a Blockbuster with three return envelopes to exchange. My wife, who had never exchanged movies before, didn't know to hold onto the envelopes until checkout and sat them on top of the counter as she walked in (thinking that she wasn't allowed to walk around the store with them). About two minutes later, I realized she wasn't holding them any longer and walked back to the counter to pick them up. Too late. The clerk had already checked them in without pausing even for a second to see if someone was planning to use them. Again, the clerk and manager claimed that they were powerless slaves to the computer and wouldn't be unable to let us use the credit towards any new movies since they were already checked-in. Still sore after the treatment I had received a month earlier, I didn't want to let this go, but they wouldn't budge. I explained that I was a long-term customer who rarely redeemed my credits, but they stood firm. We ended up paying for two movies and left.


Incident 3: Today. I tightly clutched my return envelopes as I slowly browsed the shelves for three new movies to exchange. Finally, I settle on two movies and a Wii game. Last year, I was able to use a return envelope to pick-up a Wii game without a problem. Well apparently things have now changed. After scanning my three envelopes, they scanned the three items I had brought up. $5.34. "Excuse me, this should be an even exchange." Apparently not. Now the returned movie only counts as $4 off a $9 game rental. Oh well, I thought, "Just take it off and I'll grab another movie". Nope - Apparently each credit gets automatically applied to a specific item and can't be re-transfered to another item. On top of that, they wouldn't remove the game from my checkout and insisted that I HAD to pay for the game, even though I hadn't payed yet and the transaction was unfinished. They insisted that the transaction WAS finished and now I had to pay for it (Which doesn't make any sense. How can the transaction be over before I am even told what the cost will be). After much debate with the manager, they agreed to take the game off the transaction (as a "Favor"), but they couldn't do anything about applying the credit to another movie. By this time I had already decided that I would be writing this letter when I got home, and canceling my year-long subscription to Blockbuster Total Access.


It no longer surprises me that Blockbuster is failing as a company. They are closing many stores and hemorrhaging cash. Many analysts don't even expect them to survive more than a few years. They may not be able to compete with the price and selection of Netflix or the new Apple video rentals, but they had one thing strongly going for them - availability. I knew that if I really needed to, I could go down the street and pick up a physical movie and talk to a real person if I needed to. Now my mindset has changed. Clearly, Blockbuster has decided that their employees and even managers are too incompetent to run their own stores and must be treated like trained monkeys. Even when I found a sympathetic ear, they were simply powerless to over-ride the computer for even simple tasks. Oh well, now that Netflix has unlimited downloads at less than half of the price I was paying at Blockbuster, maybe this is exactly the incentive I needed to make the change.

What do you Netflix customers think? How's the water in your end of the pool?

Should he switch?

(Photo:medalian1)

]]>
Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:16:34 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=346511&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sorry, Blockbuster Is Not Available ]]> Reader Amy is wondering if anyone knows why Blockbuster Online is, well, not online.

Any idea on what's going on at http://www.blockbuster.com/?
Tried to log on this AM and it says "Sorry, BLOCKBUSTER Online is temporarily unavailable while we make some changes to the site. We're working hard to bring you an ever better BLOCKBUSTER Online experience. Check back soon!"
Nice, since I am a Blockbuster Online member and now have zero access to my queue or know what's coming to me next.
Haven't the foggiest, Amy.

Anyone have any ideas?

Blockbuster

]]>
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:34:44 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=341598&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ You Really, Really, Hate Blockbuster For Raising Prices ]]> Here's a collection of reactions to Blockbuster's rate increase culled from our tipline:

I responded by immediately canceling my account - I gave them the benefit of a doubt the first time, but this is too much.

One thing I enjoyed, when you cancel your account through their website - there's a text field for "How Can We Improve"....but it's limited to 255 characters....I don't think they can really improve in only 255 letters. -Scott

"I don't know what planet you are from, but the marketing technique of "make the company richer at the expense of existing customers" does not translate well to consumers. I would understand a price hike for new customers, but to slap your current customers in the face with these OUTRAGEOUS prices is absurd. This is especially true when said consumers can get a drastically better deal from your competitor and they are still dropping prices. Have you thought about how your pricing plans compare with Netflix, your main competitor in the online movie rental industry? Its no wonder Blockbuster has lost so much money in the past quarter. Not to mention losing over half a million customers." -Kris

i just got this email from blockbuster, this sh#$ is getting rediculous?!? i was happy with my 14 dollar plan with unlimited trades, now im going to be paying 20 bucks a month for 5 trade ins and a lousy 4 movies a month? what a scam! -Chris

Your plan restructure took effect this summer and I received a notice that my rate and features would be grandfathered in and remain the same. I would not personally consider this rate hike part of that restructuring; several months have passed. I have subscribed to your service for a long time, since shortly after it started. Now I am about to leave. I understand the realities of business and appreciate your candor. The question is what are you willing to do to keep me as a customer? -Tim

Ugh. -Naomi

I have been using blockbuster online now for a few years and have been enjoying instore exchanges. Back in July they changed their subscription plans, but to my suprise i was grandfathered in under my old plan and was told i would not have to change my plan (at this time). Well last night was time. I got an email saying the price would go to 19..99 from 17.99 and only get a limited number of instore exchanges. Granted i probably use about an average of about 4 instore exchanges a month (some months i use 10 but some i use 1), but this might be the straw that breaks the camels back and send me BACK to Netflix. -Will

First they drop me from unlimeted in-store exchanges down to 5 in-store exchanges per month. The number 5 is idiotic...movies come 3 at a time in the mail...why not allow 6 in-store exchanges per month? At least then you could feel somewhat fulfilled by having 2 opportunities per month to exchange everything that you get in the mail - it's not what I signed up for in the first place, but I understand that you can't have unlimited everything. The biggest kick in the teeth is that when I follow the rules and make my 4th and 5th exchange in a month (turning in 3 envelopes, picking up two in-store excahnges) the in-store reps ALWAYS ask me why I'm not taking advantage of all 3 exchanges! I'm tired of explaining their own policy to them!

Now, after I get less than what I signed up for and have to do all the brainwork for their reps, Blockbuster has sent me a notice telling me they will be raising the price of my monthly fee $2 per month, from $17.99 to $19.99...so for the past few months, I was paying the same for less...now, I'll be paying more for less.

As I have explained to Blockbuster before, I am sorry that I signed up for their offers and made them so successful, but I won't do it anymore. I'm going back to Netflix ASAP. -Greg

I got a Christmas supprise from Blockbuster Online this morning. They sent me a E-Mail telling me how much I love them and hidden in the 3rd chapter was informed that they were so awesome that I was going to be able to pay them $2 more ($11.99) starting in a week.

What a great Bait and Switch. They make me realize that there store down the street is too expensive, then they make me switch to Netflix. At lease Netflix does not hold movies back when you exchange too many in a month. -Jeremy

They must be out of their damn minds.

I am switching to Netflix. -Bill

They say it so nicely, don't they... how many people do you think actually read this email? -MarkMan

Blockbuster is now trying to raise out rate by two bucks a month after sending an e-mail a couple months back telling us our service nor price was changing. They really know how to keep customers! I'm out of there! -Wayne

Good job Blockbuster!

]]>
Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:59:57 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336226&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Total Access Is Raising Your Rates ]]> Reader Graeme says:

Looks like in addition to bad service Blockbuster wants another 2 bucks per customer who were grandfathered in by the old pricing system.

I Kinda thought it was too good to last, guess I was right.

Here's the email they sent to announce that they were raising the monthly fee:
Hi *******,

As a BLOCKBUSTER Total Access™ subscriber, it's always easy to have the right movie during this holiday season with more than 75,000 titles, including great new releases like Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, The Bourne Ultimatum and Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End.

We know that during this busy time of year the convenience of BLOCKBUSTER Total Access is especially important to you. Have your movies delivered right to your door. If you want new movies right away, exchange in-store*. And with free shipping both ways and no late fees, it's easy to enjoy all the movies you want for as long as you want.

To continue to bring you the unmatched convenience of both online and in-store DVD rentals, your monthly subscription fee will change slightly from $17.99 to $19.99. This adjustment† will go into effect on your next billing cycle on or after December 27, 2007. The benefits of your subscription plan will remain the same...and it's a value of $34.99!

And now check out blockbuster.com where you can view exclusive footage from The Great Debaters, the much anticipated new movie starring Denzel Washington that opens in theaters on Christmas Day. This is just another example of how BLOCKBUSTER® is working to bring you exciting new entertainment features.

There are plenty of long winter nights ahead, so make sure that your Queue is filled with all the movies you want to watch next including new movie releases coming in January 2008, such as 3:10 to Yuma, The Game Plan and Saw IV.

Thanks for continuing to be a BLOCKBUSTER Total Access subscriber. It truly is the best entertainment value out there.

BLOCKBUSTER

We like this part: "The benefits of your subscription plan will remain the same...and it's a value of $34.99!" Oh really? Is that similar to the set of knives that are an "over $200 value" for just "one easy payment of $19.99?" Because I saw those on TV, and I was really wondering how they figured out that the set of knives had a $200 value. Maybe Blockbuster knows. ]]>
Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:31:59 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=336209&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Chides You For Losing The Movies In Your Queue ]]> I have been a long time reader of consumerist, and hoped I would never have to send in anything to you guys. Leave it to Blockbuster to force me to do this.

I have been using Blockbuster Online for almost a year now. It has been ups and downs. I have been shipped the wrong movie countless times, but just took the pain of not being able to watch my movie and sent it back. I have received enough "wrong" movies to deserve a few months of free service, but I don't even complain I just figure "Nature of the Business".


Now to my issue.... I had rented the classic "Apocalypse Now" and watched Disc One (which by the way Blockbuster online doesn't tell you it is 2 discs on some of the choices so it is hit or miss.). So I went to my queue to put disc 2 on the list so I can enjoy the end of the movie. To my dismay, I log in to my account to find my queue EMPTY. I had 20-30 movies in the queue.... all gone!

So I email Blockbuster asking what happened to my movies? and can they do anything to recover the list! This is when the Mania ensues.... The respondent from Blockbuster was rude at best. Won't acknowledge I even have a problem. Basically accuses me of erasing all of my movies (why would someone do that?) or that I gave my password to someone else and they did it. The most scathing part is that in her first response she in so many words "scolds" me for having an empty queue! I am also a big fan of the "Always here to help" signature on the end of the emails....

It is a ridiculous response, and considering their situation they should be doing jumping jacks to keep customers. Instead they respond with nonsense. They sent me two "surveys" after each response which I filled out "Extremely Dissatisfied" on every question.

Here is a copy of the Emails for your reading enjoyment. Hopefully people reading this will choose to not use Blockbuster, or even better someone from Blockbuster will read this and go to the customer service office and rattle some cages of their customer service agents.

My first email:
"All the movies I had in my queue are gone? What happened can I get the list back?"

Blockbusters Response:
"Hello Martin,

Thanks for contacting BLOCKBUSTER Online Customer Care.

I've checked that your queue is empty. Unfortunately, we would not be able to recover the list of movies that you have. You may just try to add movies again. Please remember that we use your queue to provide service and ask that you keep 30-40 "Available" movies listed at all times to ensure there are no interruptions.


Always here to help,

Regina
Customer Care Associate
BLOCKBUSTER Online"

My Response:

"Regina,

That isn't a good answer.

1. What happened to everything I had in there? Where did they go?
2. I don't like the attitude of your response. You basically scolded me for not having 30-40 movies available. I DID have movies in there, the complete list is GONE.
3. If you can't recover my list, I want SEVERAL months credit to my account. There was months of picking movies in there. I will never be able to remember all the movies my Wife and I put in there.

Please provide a better response. Your response was sub-par at best.
Marty"

Blockbuster 2nd Response:

"Hello Marty,

Please note that your queue can only be accessed with your own personal password. We don't have the ability to modify or manage titles to your queue. You are also solely responsible for all activities that occur on your account or through use of your password by yourself or by other persons. Please make sure that your password is secured so no one can add or delete a movie in your queue without your knowledge. Thanks for your understanding.


Always here to help,

Regina
Customer Care Associate
BLOCKBUSTER Online"

My 3rd Response:

Regina,

Can you please give this to a manager? You are not even answering my questions!

I did NOT delete anything from my queue, and I am the ONLY person with the password. Why would I delete my movies that a spent months putting the list together.

Please give this to someone who can give me a real answer. Otherwise I will have to cancel and go to Netflix. This is ridiculous that you aren't taking me seriously. I didn't delete anything and now after 2 communications from you... I still have not even gotten as little as and APOLOGY.

Regards,
Marty

Marty, why are you complaining to Consumerist when it's obvious that you deleted the movies in the queue yourself. Oh wait, no. It's not actually that obvious.

Our advice? Netflix? The local library?

(Photo:Maulleigh)

]]>
Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:18:14 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=319523&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Total Access Fails, Netflix Wins ]]> mortalvideowars.jpgWe're ready to call Netflix the winner of this battle of the video war, based on Blockbusters remarkably sad third quarter numbers and the flood of pissed off emails we've been getting from Blockbuster's (former) customers.

Blockbuster managed to lose $35 million in the third quarter, and its customers have been writing in to complain about benefits being cut from their "Total Access" packages.

Not good.

From Forbes:

Chairman Jim Keyes announced that Blockbuster will reduce the number of people currently employed by the company in an effort to reduce annualized overhead costs by approximately $45 million.

As if any more proof was need that Blockbuster Total Access program essentially failed to compete effectively against Netflix (nasdaq: NFLX - news - people ), Keyes noted that "the company will no longer be narrowly focused on its online subscriber count but instead will concentrate on the growth of, and report on, its total membership."

Netflix wins. We wonder if Blockbuster will continue. Anyone have some tokens they could borrow?
Blockbuster Goes Bust [Forbes]
(Photo:Wikipedia)

]]>
Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:25:54 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=317974&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Cancels Your Plan? Or Does It? ]]> Can someone tell us what the hell is going on with Blockbuster? Some readers are writing in saying that they're being allowed to keep their plan but are warned that if they change it they'll be kicked off and charged more. Other readers are saying that their plan has been completely canceled and they have to choose another one. Still other people are on the same plan but now are not receiving coupons. We've gotten about 20 emails about this issue, but are at a loss to understand it.

Can we please get a straight answer about what the hell is going on with Blockbuster? They are definitely screwing you, but apparently they're doing it in about 9 different ways, making it hard for us to write the headline.

(Photo:Maulleigh)

]]>
Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:53:21 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=297215&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Manager Curses At Customer Who Refused To Sign Up For Rewards Program ]]> A Blockbuster manager responded to reader Sarah's refusal to sign up for Blockbuster's rewards program by declaring: "Fucking customers, I'm tired of everyone not listening when they don't even know what they're talking about." Sarah had politely declined to enroll in the program several times before the outburst.

She writes:

My boyfriend and I entered the store on 1848 Airport Rd., Suite K in Chapel Hill, NC at 9:30 PM on Saturday, August 25, to rent two movies. As I am a previous Online customer, but have never held a Blockbuster in-store rental account, I signed up at the customer service desk before checking out with a very polite woman. She started to explain the Rewards program, but upon my polite expression of disinterest, she offered me a brochure and said I could read it over and decide later if I'd like to enroll.

After receiving my card, I went over to the rental desk and waited in line. An employee at the rental desk asked if we were ready, so we proceeded to check out. He asked if we had just registered, and we told him we had. He then began to tell us about the Rewards program, and I showed him the brochure we'd just been given and said we weren't interested at the moment. He continued to tell us about it, and I told him expressly I was definitely not interested. He continued describing it, and I said, "No, really, it's okay. I'm not interested. Thanks though." He started to get visibly frustrated with us, and said that we didn't understand, and then asked if we'd be renting another movie from Blockbuster in the next year, and how we could get a free movie every month, and I said one more time that I was really not interested. My boyfriend at this point felt like I was not being respected (which I wasn't), and said, "I think she knows what she's saying, she's not interested." At this point the employee said, "NO, you aren't listening, why don't you tell me what I've been talking about?" I was incredibly offended at this point, as I feel that the customer is entirely entitled to refuse voluntary programs. At this point, I asked to speak to a manager, and the man held up his employee ID badge to identify himself as the manager. I was amazed that any company would place such a rude individual into such a position, and asked him if he was seriously the manager. Finally, he muttered, "Fucking customers, I'm tired of everyone not listening when they don't even know what they're talking about." This was absolutely absurd, as there were children in the store, directly behind us in line — not to mention that he had just cursed at a customer. He began to argue with my boyfriend, at which point I just asked for our merchandise so we could leave. He slammed the DVDs down on the counter, told us they were due Saturday, and was very visibly on edge.

This encounter has completely turned me off of all Blockbusters at this point, and I'm actually dreading even returning the DVDs I rented tonight. I seriously hope Blockbuster doesn't intend this to be the normal experience for its customers, and I suggest you seriously consider this e-mail as fair warning of an out-of-control situation. I have heard of absolutely horrible customer service experiences at Blockbuster stores in the past, but I never really believed them until tonight.

I am so horrified by this experience, I am considering filing a complaint with the Better Business Bureau. Again, I've dealt with a lot of rude employees at various institutions, but I have never felt so disrespected and so upset as I am tonight.

Reasonable upsells are tolerable when delivered by polite employees, but no customer should be subjected to aggressive outbursts, especially not from managers. Beyond complaining to the Better Business Bureau, contact Blockbuster corporate at (214) 854-3000 and let them know their manager's outrageous behavior cost them a customer.

(Photo: RocketRaccoon)

]]>
Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:57:41 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=293535&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Ace Up Netflix's Sleeve: Excellent Customer Service ]]> Netflix is investing in superior customer service to differentiate themselves from Blockbuster as the two rental giants remain locked in a vicious price war. The company has completely shunned email-based support, instead relying on 200 friendly Oregonians to answer calls around the clock. Netflix CSRs, unlike most, are not given target call durations, and are encouraged to "err on the side of generosity" when dispensing compensation. They have one shockingly simple goal: satisfy the customer.

From the New York Times:

The Hillsboro operation, which occupies about 30,000 square feet of a low building in an office park, is intended to keep the red envelopes coming. Michael Osier, vice president for information technology operations and customer service, said he rejected cities like Phoenix, Salt Lake City and Las Vegas, which are known as call-center capitals, because of their high employee turnover rates. He settled on the greater Portland area because of the genial attitude on the part of most service workers.

"In hotels and coffee shops and the airport, it's amazing how consistent people are in their politeness and empathy," said Mr. Osier, who is based at Netflix headquarters in Los Gatos, Calif. "There's an operational language in the industry that people are so jaded about — phrases like 'due to high caller volume.' We're very consciously trying to counter that mentality."

Netflix's decision to eliminate the e-mail feature was made after a great deal of research, Mr. Osier said. He looked at two other companies with reputations for superb phone-based customer service, Southwest Airlines and American Express, and saw that customers preferred human interaction over e-mail messages. "My assessment was that a world-class e-mail program was still going to be consistently lower in quality and effectiveness than a phone program," he said.

When Mr. Osier presented his findings in January to fellow executives, Reed Hastings, the Netflix chief executive, sent an enthusiastic message, BlackBerry to BlackBerry, from across the room. Mr. Hastings quickly became a supporter of the e-mail elimination project.

The company has tried to give the service representatives more discretion in deciding when to assuage disgruntled callers with bonus discs and account credits — and they are allowed to err on the side of generosity. More often than not, a month's credit will be issued or a missing disc marked simply as lost, and the customer will not be charged. Netflix places no particular requirements on call duration, preferring that customer service representatives take the time they need to keep a customer happy and loyal.

This is an exceptionally prescient move by Netflix. Price wars help attract new customers, but superior customer service staunches customer turnover, and has been proven to improve a company's bottom line. Blockbuster has parried each Netflix move so far, except this one:
In contrast, Blockbuster outsources a portion of its customer service, and when people do call, they are encouraged to use the Web site instead. Its call center is open only during business hours, said Shane Evangelist, senior vice president and general manager for Blockbuster Online, because the majority of customers prefer e-mail support, which is available 24 hours a day. "Our online customers are comfortable using e-mail to communicate," he said.

At Netflix, Victory for Voices Over Keystrokes [NYT]
(Photo: Getty Images) ]]>
Sun, 19 Aug 2007 10:58:40 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=291033&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Netflix Aims To Destroy Blockbuster, Drops Prices Yet Again ]]> Netflix has dropped the price of their 3 movie at a time service... again, says Consumerist's sister site Gizmodo. We don't really know what else to say about it because it was only a few weeks ago that we posted the last Netflix price-cut.

We'll just say: "Yay."

Netflix Lowers Prices for DVD Rentals by $1 ... Again [Gizmodo]

PREVIOUSLY: Netflix Sticks It To Blockbuster, Cuts Prices Again

]]>
Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:32:47 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=290377&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Don't Visit Blockbuster To Redeem This Coupon ]]> This Blockbuster coupon cannot be redeemed for free rentals, soda, or popcorn. It is a waste of toner and time. From Snopes:

It apparently originated as a genuine rewards coupon e-mailed as part of a Blockbuster promotion, but its use is supposed to be tied to the redeemer's having earned it through participation in a specific affiliate program. Thus, the many, many consumers (other than the original intended recipients) who have been forwarded a copy of the same coupon by others and tried to redeem it at Blockbuster outlets have been informed (by store personnel and/or in-store signage) that the coupon is not legitimate and will not be accepted.
Ugh, another internet myth debunked by Snopes. First they say Bill Gates won't give us $245 for forwarding an email, then they tell us we won't be declared legally insane for taking more than seven hits of LSD, and now this. Thanks, Snopes, for ruining the internet.

Blockbuster Coupon [Snopes via Frugal For Life]

]]>
Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:50:44 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=288513&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Tries To Thwart Netflix, Gobbles Up Movie Download Service ]]> This%20Man%20Loves%20Movie%20Downloads%21.jpgBlockbuster has purchased Movielink, an ailing movie download service cobbled together by film studios to combat online piracy. The deal will give Blockbuster access to movies from Sony, Universal, Paramount, MGM, and Warner Brothers. Netflix's download service, by contrast, offers a limited selection of mostly older movies. The deal is the latest salvo fired in the consumer-friendly war of the movie rental services. No word yet on how long hackers might take to crack the new download service.

Blockbuster buys download service [Mercury News]
(Photo: Magic Lantern Shows)

]]>
Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:30:40 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=288247&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Raises Prices, Gives You Until Yesterday To Change Your Plan ]]> Blockbuster would like you to know that you are a valued customer... and that you have until yesterday to change your plan before the new pricing goes into effect.

Reader Melissa writes:

This email arrived in my inbox at 1:23am on July 27th letting me know that Blockbuster is changing their subscription plans. Don't worry they say, because this won't change my current pricing, but any change after July 26th will result in the new price structure. Nice timing there eh?

Whoops! Guess they "accidentally" sent out the email a bit too late.

Blockbuster writes (to Melissa):

Dear Melissa,

We want to let you know about some changes to our BLOCKBUSTER Total Access subscription plans. This information is provided for your reference only - your subscription plan will not be affected by these changes.

Beginning July 26, 2007, there will be a price increase on your current unlimited plan. We will also begin to offer plans which limit the number of in-store exchanges available each month.

As a preferred customer, your plan will not change at this time. Please continue to enjoy your exclusive subscription plan, including no monthly limit on free* movie rentals or discounted game rentals when you exchange in-store, at today's price - far below the published rate available to new subscribers.

At any point, you can log in and review your current subscription plan or see all available plans. Keep in mind that if you want to change your subscription plan at any point after July 26, 2007, your new plan will be subject to prices and terms available at that time.

Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

Sincerely,
Your Friends at BLOCKBUSTER

Meanwhile, Netflix just lowered prices. Again.

PREVIOUSLY: Netflix Sticks It To Blockbuster, Cuts Prices Again

]]>
Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:21:56 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=283240&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Netflix Sticks It To Blockbuster, Cuts Prices Again ]]> Kangaroo%20Fight.jpgThe consumer-friendly price war between Netflix and Blockbuster rages on this week as Netflix cuts the price of its two most popular subscription plans by $1. The cost of Netflix's 3-DVD plan will drop to $16.99, while the 1-DVD plan will fall to $8.99. The price drops will make Netflix plans $1 cheaper than comparable Blockbuster plans featuring Total Access. Both retailers slashed the price of their 2-DVD options last month to $13.99. The latest move from Netflix is meant to drain much-needed cash from Blockbuster. From the Chicago Tribune:
Stepping up its attack on Netflix also has been hurting Blockbuster, which has had to spend more heavily on DVDs to ensure sure its stores have enough discs to keep up with the additional demand from its roughly 3 million online subscribers. The company lost $49 million in the first quarter.

Blockbuster may not be willing to endure those kinds of losses much longer, especially with the recent hiring of a new CEO, James Keyes. In a Securities and Exchange Commission filing last month, Blockbuster said it will modify its online service "to strike the appropriate balance between continued subscriber growth and enhanced profitability."

This rabid price war is exactly how the free market should work. If only the telecommunications sector fought this way...

Netflix to lower online DVD rental fees in battle with Blockbuster [Chicago Tribune]
PREVIOUSLY: Netflix Lowers Costs As Blockbuster Prepares To Raise Prices
(Photo: Pascal Vuylsteker)

]]>
Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:27:23 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=282042&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Netflix Lowers Costs As Blockbuster Prepares To Raise Prices ]]> Netflix has reduced the cost of its 2-DVD plan by $1 to $13.99, matching a move made by Blockbuster earlier this month. Blockbuster had expected to be dancing triumphantly atop the battered and bankrupt corpse of its rival by now, but Netflix's staying power is causing Blockbuster to re-think its strategy. By the end of the year, Blockbuster will raise the price of its Total Access service, which allows subscribers access to its retail locations.

The company said in the filing that it planned to modify its popular Total Access plan before the end of the year to "strike the appropriate balance between continued subscriber growth and enhanced profitability."
Netflix's email to subscribers, after the jump:
Dear Customer:

Great news! We're lowering the price on our 2 DVDs out at-a-time plan to $13.99 a month plus applicable taxes. Now you can enjoy Netflix for less!

You don't need to do a thing - except pay less. Your membership will automatically move to the lower price and be reflected in your Membership Terms and Details. The lower price will take effect beginning with your statement on or after June 28, 2007.

Membership Terms and Details:

Your $13.99 plan gives you 2 DVDs out at-a-time and you can also watch 14 hours of movies and TV episodes instantly on your PC each month - for no additional charge.

Enjoy!
Your friends at Netflix

Blockbuster Settles Fight With Netflix [NYT]
PREVIOUSLY:Blockbuster To Close 282 Stores
Blockbuster Weighing Charge For Total Access
(Photo: swruler9284)

]]>
Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:17:17 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=273459&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster To Close 282 Stores ]]> The AP is reporting that Blockbuster will be closing 282 stores nationwide and will beef up spending on its online DVD rental service in order to compete with industry-leader Netflix. From the AP:

"Traffic is just not what it used to be when Blockbuster was the big rooster in the hen house," said Andy Cross, senior analyst with The Motley Fool.

In 2006, Blockbuster closed 290 U.S. stores and transferred a quarter of the revenue from closed stores to surrounding stores, the company said. It expects similar benefits to surrounding stores from the anticipated closures this year.

The company is aggressively seeking a new approach after years of ignoring Netflix, Cross said.

"They don't make any money on the online business, which is a smaller part of their current business, and they're not going to make any money on that, definitely not this year," Cross said. "I personally think they will continue to struggle."

Hmm, Where do they stock the used XBOX 360 games?

Blockbuster Closing 282 US Stores [Forbes]
(Photo:imjoshdotcom)

]]>
Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:25:06 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=273736&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Sends Customer Bootlegged Copy Of Tenchi in Tokyo Three Times ]]> You%20can%27t%20find%20me%2C%20ha%20ha.pngPoor Tinky. All he wanted was for Blockbuster to send him volume two of the Japanese anime Fushingi Yuugi. He ordered the DVD three times, but Blockbuster will only send a Chinese bootleg of Tenchi in Tokyo.
Each time, it's been marked in the queue as the wrong disc and sent back. The second time, I sent an email and received a generic response. Today, the third time we've received the same wrong disc, I placed notes on the disc's sleeve and the disc itself, hoping that will get someone's attention [not likely!].
If regular customer service won't help fight Chinese bootleggers, Tinky should summon executive customer service in his quest to liberate Fushingi Yuugi. Contact information for Blockbuster Chairman of the Board and CEO John Antioco, after the jump...


Tinky's email:
My family have been using Blockbuster's online service for almost a year, and until recently, have had absolutely no problems with it. Normally we receive DVDs within a day of them being sent out, and the selection of films we like is amazing. They even carry a great selection of anime. This is, coincidently, where the trouble lies.

My roommates have been wanting to see the series Fushigi Yuugi for some time. Last month we got the idea to check Blockbuster and, lo and behold, they had the entire series, OVAs and all. We placed the TV series in the queue first, and bumped it to the top. Of course, they were sent out of order, but that's not the complaint. We have so far been sent volume 2 three times, and each time encountered the exact same problem. Instead of the proper disc, we've opened the sleeve and found a Chinese bootleg copy of Tenchi in Tokyo! Each time, it's been marked in the queue as the wrong disc and sent back. The second time, I sent an email and received a generic response. Today, the third time we've received the same wrong disc, I placed notes on the disc's sleeve and the disc itself, hoping that will get someone's attention [not likely!].

I have a sinking feeling that next week we'll have the same problem we've been having. Normally this sort of thing doesn't bother me, and truth be told, I've seen most of the series already. For my roommates, they'll be hopelessly lost if they miss out on seven episodes. I'd like to escalate this issue, but I have no idea where to start. Any advice you can offer would be greatly appreciated.

John Antioco can be reached at john.antioco@blockbuster.com. If you still don't hear back, call Blockbuster corporate at (214) 854-3000 and ask for John Antioco's office. — CAREY GREENBERG-BERGER

]]>
Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:23:20 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=271714&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Sides With Sony Blu-Ray ]]> Blockbuster has announced its decision to exclusively rent Sony Blu-Ray DVDs, much to the dismay of HD DVD owners. According to the AP, the decision comes following a test of both formats at 250 stores. Blockbuster found that consumers were choosing Blu-ray over 70% of the time.

"The consumers are sending us a message. I can't ignore what I'm seeing," Matthew Smith, senior vice president of merchandising at Blockbuster, told The Associated Press.

The North American HD DVD Promotional Group responded: "I think trying to make a format decision using such a short time period is really not measuring what the consumer is saying," said Ken Graffeo, co-president.

Is this the final blow for HD DVD? Wait, does anyone still rent at Blockbuster? —MEGHANN MARCO

AP: Blockbuster to Favor Blu-Ray HD Disc [AP] (Thanks, Phil!)
(Photo: medalian1)

]]>
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:34:07 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=269789&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Weighing Charge For Total Access ]]> Blockbuster may soon levy a $4-$6 surcharge for Total Access. By allowing DVDs to be exchanged as free in-store rentals, Total Access dangles a potential workout before couch-potatoes who would otherwise return DVDs exclusively by mail. Blockbuster is quietly circulating a survey to gauge potential outrage to a price hike.

One of the ideas is to offer Mail-Only plans, which would allow members to receive and return DVDs only by mail, without the option to return them at a Blockbuster store and exchange them for free in-store DVDs.

At the same time that the Mail-Only plans are introduced, BLOCKBUSTER Total Access may also experience price changes to reflect the added value that this program represents compared to the Mail-Only options.

Blockbuster would also add additional service tiers, including an unlimited plan allowing four DVDs out at once, and limited plans capped at either two or three DVDs per month.

What do you think? Is Total Access' "added value" worth the price? Is this enough to consider NetFlix's movie streaming? Tell us in the comments. — CAREY GREENBERG-BERGER

Blockbuster Online to Raise Prices? [Hacking NetFlix] (Thanks to Frank!)

]]>
Thu, 08 Mar 2007 11:04:34 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=242596&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Rogue Manager in Astoria Violates Blockbuster Corporate Policy ]]> Remember our friend Morgan who was told he had to pay 10 bucks and sign up for Blockbuster Online in order to rent a movie? He called Blockbuster Corporate and they told him that was not Blockbuster policy.

The woman I spoke to said that Blockbuster's corporate policy is that you should be able to sign up for just a membership, with no fee and no requirement to sign up for Blockbuster Online. She said that franchise stores have the choice to set their own policies, but that all corporate-owned stores should be following that rule. She also confirmed that my local store is corporate-owned, not a franchise, and should therefore be following the rules.

I then called my local store and spoke to the manager there. He confirmed that his store's policy is to require Blockbuster Online signup. I told him that Blockbuster corporate policy was not to require Blockbuster Online signup, and he didn't care. He said that "all the stores are doing it". I reiterated that his policy was in violation of Blockbuster's policy, and he refused to change his tune. Eventually I hung up in frustration.

Let it be known that as long as it is a corporate-owned Blockbuster, you don't have to sign up with their online crap or pay a fee.

Blockbusted Update [Whose Faulty Vision]
(Photo: Maulleigh)

PREVIOUSLY: Blockbuster Store Requires New Members to Sign Up For Online Service?

]]>
Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:36:58 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=238972&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blockbuster Store Requires New Members to Sign Up For Online Service? ]]> Reader and blogger Morgan went to his local Blockbuster to rent a movie. He'd never rented at the store before, so he needed to sign up for a membership. We've all done this before, but this time, something was different:

The guy at the counter told me that I had to show a driver's license and major credit card (perfectly reasonable), pay a $10 dollar fee (a bit much, but acceptable) and sign up for their Netflix ripoff, Blockbuster Online. Wait, what? I told him that I didn't want to sign up for Blockbuster Online, and he refused to let me start a membership without signing up. And of course I couldn't rent movies without a membership, so I was forced to leave without my movies.

I don't want to sign up for Blockbuster Online. I know I wouldn't use the service enough to justify the monthly fee. I know that canceling is likely to be difficult-if the company's this obnoxious about forcing you to sign up, they'll be at least as obnoxious about trying to keep you from leaving.

Morgan tried emailing Blockbuster to see if this was a store-wide policy or just one rogue manager. They didn't write back. Has this happened to anyone else? Are they inflating the subscription numbers for their Netflix ripoff by bullying in-store customers? Lame. —MEGHANN MARCO

Blockbusted [Whose Faulty Vision]
(Photo: Maulleigh)

]]>
Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:51:34 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=238223&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Comcast: On-Demand Rentals on DVD Release Date ]]> The New York Times is reporting that Comcast will begin testing a new video on demand service in two cities, Pittsburgh and Denver. Unlike traditional video on-demand that shows movies 30- to 45-days after their release date on DVD, this service will allow movies to be ordered the same date as the DVD release. This puts video on-demand in direct competition with sales and rentals. Each on-demand rental will cost $4, which compares with DVD rental prices. Uh-oh, Blockbuster. Forget the beginning of the end, this is the end of the end. —MEGHANN MARCO

On Demand and on DVD at the Same Time [New York Times]

]]>
Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:19:48 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=222788&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Gift Cards Are The Most Popular Gift ]]> The 2006 Deloitte report on gift cards is out, and it's official. Gift cards are the single most popular gift this holiday season. But are they a good buy? Sort of. It seems that due to consumer pressure, and FTC pressure, stores are improving their customer service/disclosure of fees when it comes to gift cards. But that doesn't meant there aren't still a lot of problems. The Montgomery County, Maryland, Office of Consumer Protection which assesses dozens of cards annually, has released their 2006 report. The report evaluates 40 different gift cards, looking for things like whether or not the card can be replaced if lost or stolen, whether the cards have an expiration date, and whether fees are assessed to the card's balance. Basically, you want to avoid the following cards:

•Blockbuster, Bloomingdale's and Macy's, because of expiration dates.
•Pizza Hut, and Shell for dormancy fees
•CompUsa, Home Depot,Kay Jewelers and Kmart, because the card can not be used on the store's website.

Bank cards, which are "gift cards" that can be used like a credit card, have tons of hidden fees and bullshit—and should be avoided. Also, when giving a gift card, be sure to include the original receipt...so the card can be replaced if lost or stolen if that service is available. Or just give cash. We love cash.—MEGHANN MARCO

Montgomery Country Gift Card Report [PDF]
Gift-card gotchas [Consumer Reports]
Say it with plastic [Delaware Online]

]]>
Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:25:42 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=222780&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Free Blockbuster Rentals For Netflix Subscribers ]]> Blockbuster will give you a free online rental for each Netflix envelope flap you bring into a store. You must have a Blockbuster membership to qualify. The promotions lasts until Dec. 21. It's an effort to get Netflix subscribers to sign up for Blockbuster's Total Access Online service.

TAO is functionally similar to Netflix but different in that in that its name is longer. — BEN POPKEN

Free Blockbuster rentals for Netflix subscribers [Lifehacker]

]]>
Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:41:32 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=219770&view=rss&microfeed=true