<![CDATA[Consumerist: Batteries]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Batteries]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/batteries http://consumerist.com/tag/batteries <![CDATA[ Batteries From Dell, Toshiba, and HP Laptops Recalled ]]> 35,000 laptop batteries from laptops sold from 2004-2006 have been recalled for fire and burn hazards. There have been 17 fires and 2 burns associated with these batteries, so if you've got one, make sure you take care of this issue.

The majority of the laptops with the dangerous batteries were from HP, but there were also Toshiba and Dell computers included in the recall. The batteries were manufactured by Sony.

For a list of computers, click here.

]]>
Consumerist-5072777 Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:25:35 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5072777&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Morning Deals ]]> Highlights From Dealnews
  • Lenovo ThinkPad | ThinkCentre: Lenovo ThinkPad R500 Core 2 Duo 2.26GHz 15" Widescreen Laptop for $636 + $20 s&h
  • OldNavy: Old Navy men's and women's jeans from $8 + $7 s&h
  • Amazon.com: How to buy 360 AA batteries for $22 after rebate + free shipping
Highlights From Dealhack
  • TiVo.com: $120 off Refurb Model or Free 3 Months Service with New TiVo HD DVRs
  • Sierra Trading Post: Free Shipping on top of Deep Discounts
  • Buy.com: Genius G-Pen F610 6x10-inch Graphics Tablet $69 Shipped
Highlights From Buxr
  • Aeropostale: Back to School Sale - Up to 50% off + 20% off w/ coupon code 20BTS
  • NewEgg: OCZ Platinum Edition 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM Desktop Memory for $46.99 after $30 rebate w/ Free shipping
  • Walgreens: printable coupon for $10 Off Friday and Saturday Only

]]>
Consumerist-5048917 Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:39:16 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5048917&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Duracell's New Ad: 'Oh No Your Kid Just Got Stolen!' ]]> MSNBC's Ads of the Weird blog is a little creeped out by Duracell's new kidnapping commercial, and so are we. Making people feel bad about something is advertising's job, we get that, but trying to scare parents into thinking their kid will be stolen from the playground by the classic man-in-a-van is going a little overboard. (Watch the commercial below.)

As MSNBC puts it, "It kind of makes us pine for that irritating, but light-hearted, Energizer bunny." Plus, you can use the bunny to point out where the bad man touched you.

"Trust Duracell to Scare the *$#%! Out of You" [MSNBC]

]]>
Consumerist-5039740 Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:56:07 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5039740&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ This Battery Shipment From Dell Was Packed Efficiently ]]> Our inbox is overflowing with links to the above photograph from the Daily WTF.

An anonymous reader sent the photo in after they ordered a shipment of 50 CMOS batteries from Dell in an attempt to save time and money by asking for "fifty spare batteries instead of having them delivered individually." This is what they got, a big box with 50 smaller boxes inside.

Packing Done Right [Daily WTF] (Thanks, Everyone!)

]]>
Consumerist-5035503 Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:59:23 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5035503&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Target To 80-Year-Old: Yeah, We Sold You The Wrong Watch Battery, But We Won't Take It Back ]]> David cc'd us on a letter he recently sent to Target:

My mother in law, recently went to Target to get a battery installed for her watch. The watch was a common Timex model and the associate told her that she would have to buy the battery first. So she purchased that battery, and the associate attempted to install it in the watch. The battery did not fit the watch, so the associate said "sorry, we don't have the right battery" and then refused to take the battery back and refund her money. She was told they don't take back opened battery packages.

Was she taken advantage of as she is 80 years old, or is this store policy? This occurred at the Target Superstore in Miramar, Florida two weeks ago.

We asked David if he tried following up with Target on his mother-in-law's behalf.

Yes, I called and spoke to store an asst mgr, who stated that store policy is no returns on opened/used batteries. I said she never left the store, had remained at the counter, and it was your person that opened the package to remove the battery to install in her watch. I said I DONT FIND THIS ACCEPTABLE....................is this the way you treat the elderly who came to your store for assistance, and then has to buy something she cant use !!!!

After pushing the issue, she said its "its only a small amount, I probably would have taken the battery back if I was aware of this" and, "come back to the store and we will discuss this further"

So, it will cost me more in gas $$$ than the battery is worth to drive back to that store and meet with her to get a refund.

From this, I must assume it is Target policy to screw the watch battery customer...........

I know its a small $$$ amount, but for the elderly, on social security, every penny matters.

Little things like watch batteries may not cost much stores much, but blind adherence to obstinately obtuse policies can cost stores customers. The Assistant Manager at least had the common sense to realize that this is a problem with an easy solution.

Of course, the easiest solution is to treat Target as a low-end big box store, and not a repair shop. Our local jeweler resurrects dead watches for $5, which may be a bit steep compared to Target, but he's never cited 'store policy,' and he always gets our watches ticking again.

(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-5010945 Sun, 25 May 2008 22:00:12 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5010945&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Heavens, another Macbook has exploded. Apple ... ]]> macbookgoboom.jpgHeavens, another Macbook has exploded. Apple is sending him a new one. [Appeltell]

]]>
Consumerist-367844 Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:24:24 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367844&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Circuit City's AA Battery Packaging Is Remarkably Sturdy ]]> Reader Dave has an issue with Circuit City's battery packaging.
I ordered some batteries on sale from Circuit City, recently. When they arrived, the package made insane amounts of noise. I opened it up and found that the packages were basically destroyed and dozens and dozens of batteries were loose. For some reason, there's something really disquieting about having a box full of loose batteries come in the mail - maybe it's the low-toned clacking sound they make?
Yikes. It's like AA battery confetti in there. ]]>
Consumerist-367452 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:48:18 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367452&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Fourth AT&T Cable Box Explodes, Darn You, Lithium-Ion Batteries! ]]> Another of AT&T's big metal cable boxes placed on people's lawns has exploded. The system's lithium-metal-polymer batteries are the culprit, prompting AT&T to replace 17,000 of them. Four of the U-Verse cabinets have exploded since the program began.

Cleaveland.com reports:

The batteries came from Avestor, a Canadian company that went bankrupt in October 2006. AT&T stopped installing the batteries in early 2007, after the first incident, Coe said. AT&T also hired a consultant to investigate their safety, but was told the batteries posed no greater risk than alternative batteries from other suppliers.
Oops, looks like they got that one wrong.

Here's what they look like before they explode:

attuversecabinent.jpg

Your World Delivered . . . On Fire [Save Access]
AT&T Begins Massive Battery Replacement [Light Reading] (Thanks to Danger Mouse & David!)

]]>
Consumerist-345971 Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:05:04 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=345971&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Poison: The High Cost Of Cheap Batteries ]]> wang.jpgCadmium batteries are cheap and safe to use, but hazardous to manufacture. They'll save you money—about $1.50 for the average cadmium-powered toy, says the Wall Street Journal.

But cadmium batteries can be hazardous to make. In southern China, Wang Fengping worked for years in plants that produced cadmium batteries for the likes of Mattel Inc., Toys "R" Us Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. Like hundreds of her colleagues, Ms. Wang regularly inhaled the toxic red cadmium dust that filled the air in the plant.

Now, at 45, Ms. Wang is often too weak to walk. Her kidneys have failed, and her doctors have identified cadmium poisoning as the likely culprit. About 400 other workers at her former employer, Hong Kong-based GP Batteries International Ltd., have been found to harbor unsafe levels of cadmium, a toxic metal like mercury and lead that can cause kidney failure, lung cancer and bone disease.

Ms. Wang didn't manufacture the batteries. She was a machine designer with an engineering degree. Most of her career was spent in an office, sketching designs, then between 2002-2004 she spent long hours in the production facilities, inhaling cadmium dust. Now she's sick. The WSJ article details her lawsuit against the manufacturer as well as the history of cadmium battery production in the U.S. and the resulting clean-up of contaminated sites.

Some toy-makers, like Hasbro, have eschewed the use of cadmium in their products because of their toil on the environment and the health of the workers who manufacture the batteries. Mattel, however, still uses cadmium batteries, claiming that they have "performance advantages." Walmart says it doesn't buy or use cadmium batteries produced by the manufacturer that employed Ms. Wang, but declined to comment further.

Toxic Factories Take Toll On China's Labor Force [Wall Street Journal] (Thanks, Aaron!)
Ms. Wang's Blog [Yahoo!]

]]>
Consumerist-345082 Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:19:27 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=345082&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Some Spare Batteries Banned On Flights ]]> macbookburn.jpgBecause some have been known to spontaneously combust, the Department of Transportation (DOT) is banning some lithium batteries from your checked-in luggage. In the spring, a laptop battery related fire erupted in the overhead compartment of a Jetblue flight, and on an American Airlines flight from Argentina, prompting the DOT to issue a warning about packing spare batteries. Lithium batteries are commonly used in laptops and cellphones. However, the rules mainly apply to professionals and/or people who travel with spare batteries. For the most part, batteries installed in the electronic device are fine. Inside, a handy chart to tell you what's been banned.

newbatteryrules.jpg

New Battery Rules [DOT]

]]>
Consumerist-339434 Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:47:03 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=339434&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ No More Loose Non-Rechargable Lithium Batteries In Checked Luggage ]]> lithium.jpgThe TSA has announced a ban on loose non-rechargeable lithium batteries in checked luggage, because they've realized that "fire-protection systems in the cargo hold of passenger planes can't put out fires sparked in lithium batteries."

Well, that's not good.

From the AP:

Passengers can still check baggage with lithium batteries if they are installed in electronic devices, such as cameras, cell phones and laptop computers. If packed in plastic bags, batteries may be in carryon baggage. The limit is two batteries per passenger.

Baggage Ban on Batteries Begins [AP]

]]>
Consumerist-338900 Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:58:35 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338900&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How To Extend Your Battery Life ]]> lapbat.jpgReader Don felt compelled to share this tips about proper love and care of your electronic items' batteries so they last longer and you don't have to buy more unnecessarily...

  • Do not set your laptop on a bed, couch, pillow, or in some cases your lap. This will heat up the laptop due to poor ventilation and destroy the battery.
  • Kill it once a month. Once a month allow the battery to go through a complete charge cycle. If you are using a laptop or cell phone, just pay attention to the warning message that tells you to plug it in and you should be fine.
  • Do not expose to extreme heat, this will drastically shorten their life spans. One day in a hot car (90 degrees plus) and you will not be able to hold more than a 10 minute charge
  • Do not expose to extreme cold (below 40 degrees can start to harm battery life). If you do, allow the battery to warm up to room temperature before using it.
  • Use your laptop (phone, iPod, etc) at least once a month. If you let the laptop sit in a drawer too long without using it, you will damage the battery and affect its ability to hold a charge.

With a little caution and best practices, you can make your batteries last longer and save money. In some cases, replacement laptop batteries can cost as much as $500 to replace...

(Photo: Brymo)

]]>
Consumerist-315988 Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:13:31 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=315988&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 6v to 32 AA Batteries Video Is A Hoax ]]> About a month ago, a video was going around (that we, regrettably, linked to) saying that if you pried open a 6 volt battery, you would find 32 AA batteries, but it now turns out it's a hoax, riffing off the (truthful) reports that 9v batteries contain 6 AAAA batteries. 6v batteries, however, contain four 1.5 volt D-cell batteries.

If that the video was from a site called "Gagfilms.com," and being featured on their home page next to clips titled, "Video Proof That Ghosts Really Exist" and "The Girl With 2 Pussies," wasn't enough of a tipoff, the images sent in by reader Roberta who tested it out should do it for you. Full deconstruction sequence, inside...

nobat.jpg
nobat2.jpg

nobat4.jpg

Note dubious context:

dubiouscontext.jpg

Original video:

Just like your middle-school librarian told you, critical thinking and source evaluation are valuable life-long skills.

]]>
Consumerist-311694 Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:08:02 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=311694&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ PowerBook Explodes, Man's Apple Crush Grows ]]> Jimm Lasser went to sleep with his PowerBook sitting underneath his bed, and woke to find it bursting into flames. From the pictures, it looks like there was a battery malfunction.

After the husky firemen put it out, he called Apple, spent about an hour giving them an incident report, and had a new, free MacBook Pro sent to him within four days.

Like makeup sex, Jimm says he has stronger feelings about Apple than ever before:

It is like we had a fight, with knives and foreign objects and the authorities involved, but in the end, right before the credits roll, right before we look at each other covered in dirt and blood and soot and ripped clothes, we see eye to eye, human to human, me and the brand, and we shrug it off, make it even, manage a hug and keep walking together.
See? Fixing customer's problems leads to more loyal customers.

The Powerbook! The Powerbook! The Powerbook's on Fire! [Speak Up] (Thanks to CD!)

]]>
Consumerist-309306 Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:36:12 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=309306&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Cellphone Battery Designed To Fail At First Drop Of Water? ]]> Does one of the LG cellphone batteries have a sensor on it to cause cellphone failure after the first touch of water? Even though no significant amount of water has penetrated the actual battery or cellphone itself. That's what Tim wonders after conducting a little experiment and paper hack following dropping his cell phone into a tiny bit of coffee.

dropthecell2.jpg

I recently dropped my cell phone into the last sip of coffee I had in my cup, so I know the liquid didn't penetrate to any meaningful hardware, especially considering I plucked it out immediately. Stickers, on both the inside of the battery casing (on the phone) and the battery itself, were pink/red when I opened the battery cover, however, very little moisture was present. 5 minutes later my phone turned itself off and I wasn't able to turn it back on until I plugged it into my charger at the end of the day. The phone blinked the 'Charge Complete' signal to me almost immediately, but when I unplugged it from the charger it immediately turned off again and I wasn't able to turn it on without it being plugged into the charger.

Here's where the super-sketchiness comes into play. I noticed that the pink sticker on the battery was covering an indented rectangular area, so I pulled off the sticker which revealed two small brass sensors. When I cut out and installed a plain piece of white paper to replace the color changed sticker, the phone miraculously began taking a charge again and when I unplugged it from the charger, it didn't turn off.

This seems like something that would create a lot of unnecessary consumer battery purchases and therefore sales for LG (the manufacturer of the phone and the battery) while at the same time serving to void warranties for few, if any, legitimate, consumer caused issues. These phone companies take advantage of water exposure by attributing future glitches to water damage whether water is the cause or not. It is also my opinion that they have gone so far as to implement 'water activated failure mechanisms' into phones and batteries in an effort to create replacement sales for products that aren't really damaged. As my example illustrates, the removal of the failure mechanism (the pink sticker on the battery) restored the phone and battery to its pre-coffee state . . . What a scam!

That's very interesting, can you supply photos of the paper and sensors?
Ben,

Your reply prompted the attached pictures and an additional test. Upon insertion of the white paper rectangle, the phone recognized the battery as not being fully charged and began charging when plugged in. After a full charge was again realized I tried two more things with the same result:

1. I removed the white paper rectangle so that no barrier existed between the 'sensors' and the phone.
2. I replaced the pink/red rectangle between the sensors and the phone.

Both resulted in full functionality when I disconnected the phone from the charger. I'm sure you can hypothesize as well as I can as to the possible scenarios here. What I can tell you for sure is that I removed the phone from the charger after seeing the 'Charge Complete' message at least four times with the same result . . . immediate shut off. I then removed the pink/red rectangle, replaced it with the white paper rectangle, plugged it back in, started receiving a charge, waited 5 minutes, unplugged it, and it did not shut off.

I have ordered another battery and will check the original color of the pink/red rectangle when I receive it.

Is this a safety feature, a product designed to fail, or something else entirely? ]]>
Consumerist-302688 Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:07:21 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=302688&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ UPDATE: This is a total hoax. Inside a 6 ... ]]> UPDATE: This is a total hoax. Inside a 6 volt battery is 4 D batteries. So it seems you can open a 6 volt battery and find 32 AA batteries inside. Consider that a 4 pack of AAs costs around $5, and you can get a lantern battery for about $5, and that's some powerful savings. [Lifehacker]

]]>
Consumerist-301391 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:34:48 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301391&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dell Laptop Catches Fire In Shanghai Office ]]> Just when you thought it was safe taste to eat a pomegranate... a Dell laptop catches fire and self destructs! This time, on 9/03, in a Shanghai office.

We're guessing a defective battery is the culprit, thus illustrating the perils of ignoring global product recall announcements.

More pictures in the indecipherable forum where they first appeared: Dell [Hi-PDA via The Raw Feed]

]]>
Consumerist-296490 Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:17:06 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=296490&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Nokia Recalls 46 Million Defective Batteries ]]> nokiabattery.jpgNokia has recalled 46 million defective Chinese-made batteries according to the New York Times. The batteries can overheat and dislodge during charging. Nokia promises to replace the batteries at no cost to the consumer.

This recall applies only to the 46 million batteries manufactured by Matsushita between December 2005 and November 2006. No serious injuries have been reported.

Here's a list of the affected phones:
Nokia 1100, Nokia 1100c, Nokia 1101, Nokia 1108, Nokia 1110, Nokia 1112, Nokia 1255, Nokia 1315, Nokia 1600, Nokia 2112, Nokia 2118, Nokia 2255, Nokia 2272, Nokia 2275, Nokia 2300, Nokia 2300c, Nokia 2310, Nokia 2355, Nokia 2600, Nokia 2610, Nokia 2610b, Nokia 2626, Nokia 3100, Nokia 3105, Nokia 3120, Nokia 3125, Nokia 6030, Nokia 6085, Nokia 6086, Nokia 6108, Nokia 6175i, Nokia 6178i, Nokia 6230, Nokia 6230i, Nokia 6270, Nokia 6600, Nokia 6620, Nokia 6630, Nokia 6631, Nokia 6670, Nokia 6680, Nokia 6681, Nokia 6682, Nokia 6820, Nokia 6822, Nokia 7610, Nokia N70, Nokia N71, Nokia N72, Nokia N91, Nokia E50, Nokia E60

"Nokia" and "BL-5C" are printed on the battery. In order to see if your battery is part of the recall, you'll need to locate the "battery identification number" and type it into a form on Nokia's website. The site will then tell you if your battery has been recalled. From the NYT:

Akira Kadota, a Matsushita spokesman in Osaka, said all of the suspect batteries were made at a Matsushita factory in Zhuhai, a port city in southern China.

"There was nothing wrong with the design of the batteries. The problem was the result of a flaw in the manufacturing process," Mr. Kadota said in an interview. "That problem has since been solved and we have had no complaint from any other users of our batteries."

Click here to see if your battery has been recalled.

46 Million Nokia Cell Batteries Defective [New York Times]
Product Advisory: Nokia BL-5C battery [Nokia]

]]>
Consumerist-289724 Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:29:57 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=289724&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ If You're Out Of Cellphone Service For A Long Time, Remove Your Battery ]]> cellphoneoutbat.jpgIf you're going to be in an area with no cellphone service for more than a few hours, consider removing your cellphone battery during that time or it might go dead. It seems that turning your cellphone off isn't enough; the cellphone may continually try to resync with the mothership grid, and the successive abortive attempts are very draining on the battery level.

We found this out over vacation and had occasion where the cellphone was fully charged before turning it off, only to have it be flashing eep eep help me I'm dyinnnnnng when we turned it on again.

(Photo: dyobmit)

]]>
Consumerist-288757 Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:49:29 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=288757&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Acer Laptop Batteries Recalled Due To Fire Hazard ]]> Just when you thought that this whole laptop battery recall thing was over: Enter Acer computer. They're recalling certain models with (you guessed it) Sony lithium-ion batteries. Reader Joe writes:

It seems Acer fell asleep during the whole Sony battery recall thing and is just recalling them now. Well, I do have a couple of affected Acer laptops, and so far the process is painful. The operators on the other end answer the phone in a language unknown to me (though one time I think I heard the operator say South Africa?) though they promptly switched to very understandable English after I spoke.

However, the line quality is so horrible that my call was dropped 3 before being able to complete a replacement request.

Even better is the 3 to 6 weeks it is to take for the replacement to arrive. Now I need to go out and buy another battery just in case the current one decides to asplode and take my naughty bits with it.

Heaven forbid your naughty bits get taken out, Joe. For more information about the recall, click here. If you don't need to use your battery (sorry, Joe!) you can continue to use the notebook computers safely by turning the system off, removing the battery, and using the AC adapter and power cord to power the system until the replacement battery is received. —MEGHANN MARCO

Acer America Corporation Recalls Notebook Computer Batteries Due to Previous Fires
[CPSC] ]]>
Consumerist-255491 Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:59:40 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=255491&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Rumor: iPhone Battery Lasts For Only 40 Minutes Of Talk Time ]]> The iPhone battery lasts for only 40 minutes of talk time, according to intel tech guru John Dvorak received from an inside Cingular source.

"He says the amateur mistake that they made is not having a removable battery," Dvorak said. "You run 20 minutes and you're using up half the battery power. You get 40 minutes total talk time. And the interface fouls up constantly."

Given the overheating, random shutting down, and burning power cord problems, grease buildup and other problems when the new Macbooks launched, this rumor could portend similar product defects when the iPhone releases in 2 months. Interested buyers should probably wait a few months after launch for Apple to work out all the bugs. — BEN POPKEN

[TWiT 93 via theappleblog via Gizmodo]

]]>
Consumerist-249929 Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:15:58 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=249929&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Exploding Batteries On A Plane: Recent In-Flight Fires Prompt Warnings About Loose Batteries ]]> After one fire broke out in a overhead compartment on a JetBlue flight and another on an American Airlines aircraft flying from Argentina, the Department of Transportation has issued a warning to passengers traveling with loose batteries. The batteries in question are the type that power laptops, camcorders, and other "rechargeable" devices. If not stored properly the batteries can overheat and ignite.

In both cases crew were able to extinguish the fire and safely land the aircraft, however, that might not have been the case if the batteries had been stowed in checked luggage.

Do not check loose batteries. Keep spare batteries in their original retail packaging; keep loose batteries covered with insulating tape to protect them from contact with metal objects; place each battery in its own protective case, plastic bag, or package; and pack spare batteries in carry-on baggage, rather than checked baggage. Also, passengers should use only chargers designed for the battery type and take steps to prevent crushing, puncturing or dropping batteries. Also, don't play hockey with your batteries or let babies chew on them. —MEGHANN MARCO

Department of Transportation Offers Advice on the Safe Transportation of Batteries and Battery-Powered Devices by Airline Passengers and Crew [DOT]
(Photo:Stewart)

]]>
Consumerist-247086 Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:07:23 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=247086&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Cellphone Didn't Ignite Man On Fire ]]> Turns that the man in the polyester suit who caught on fire in his hotel, well, it wasn't his Nokia cellphone that started the conflagration.

"When we reinstalled the battery, the phone still booted up," said Vallejo fire department investigator Tweedy. "If the battery had malfunctioned or the phone had short-circuited, it wouldn't have worked anymore. And it did, so we could rule out the phone as an ignition source."

Investigators think matches, a lighter, or a cigarette started the blaze, which was so intense, it consumed them. Matters were made worse by the plastic chair the dude was sitting in.

Let's recap: polyester and nylon suit + cigarette + asleep = fire hazard. Either that, or this was a clearcut case of disco inferno. — BEN POPKEN

Cell phone didn't ignite California man [News.com via Gizmodo]

Previously: Cellphone Ignites In Pocket, Burning Man's Body And Hotel Room

]]>
Consumerist-229870 Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:35:10 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=229870&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Cellphone Ignites In Pocket, Burning Man's Body And Hotel Room ]]> UPDATE: It wasn't a cellphone after all.

Maybe the world's batteries are staging some kind of protest?

"A cell phone apparently ignited in a man's pocket and started a fire that burned his hotel room and caused severe burns over half his body, fire department officials said.

Luis Picaso, 59, was in stable condition Monday with second- and third-degree burns to his upper body, back, right arm and right leg, Vallejo Fire Department assistant chief Kurt Henke said.

Firefighters arrived at the residential hotel Saturday night to find Picaso lying on the bathroom floor after a malfunctioning cell phone in his pants pocket set fire to his nylon and polyester clothes, Henke said.

The flames spread to a plastic chair, setting off a sprinkler that held the fire in check, he said.

Authorities declined to name the phone's manufacturer and model.

The fire and water caused $75,000 damage to the room and a business on the ground floor, Henke said."

Let's get those fancy new, non-self-immolating batteries on the market, shall we? Although we can't help but wonder if the fire wasn't exacerbated by the man's "nylon and polyester clothes." — BEN POPKEN

Man's cell phone ignites in pocket [MSNBC] (Thanks to Jpac!)

]]>
Consumerist-228968 Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:35:31 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=228968&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Explodeproof Battery Production Spikes ]]> Matsushita announced plans to mass-produce a laptop battery that won't explode.

Baby no more boom! — BEN POPKEN

Safer laptop batteries produced [BBC]

]]>
Consumerist-223862 Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:40:31 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=223862&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Warning: Vista May Drain Laptop Batteries ]]> PC World is warning laptop users about the increased processor power that Windows Vista may use to power some of its flashy graphics. Thankfully, it seems like the problem can be avoided by using Vista's battery optimization features.

"If Vista is run in full Aero mode, with none of the Vista-provided power management settings turned on, it is likely to demand more power, and have an impact on battery life," said Dell spokesman Ira Williams, in an e-mail interview. "That said, if you run Vista in battery-optimized mode (using a non-3D interface), we would not expect the battery life to be significantly different from XP in that scenario."

So, if you're upgrading to Vista and you're really excited about those Aero windows, understand that they may come with a price, at least while on the go. —MEGHANN MARCO

Vista Could Sap Notebook PC Battery Life [PC World]

]]>
Consumerist-222968 Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:48:48 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=222968&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sony Recalls Fujitsu, Gateway, Toshiba and Sony Laptop Batteries ]]> Monday, Sony voluntarily recalled batteries for all the notebooks listed in the headline, due to risk of fire. If you own one of these laptops, check out this page to see if the recall affects you.

340,000 American laptop owners? This is Sony bowing to you slightly from its seat.

]]>
Consumerist-209986 Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:41:54 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=209986&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apple Battery Recalls Encourage Prolonging Immolation Risk ]]> Tyler writes:
My wife just (six weeks later) got her new battery from Apple for her Powerbook G4. The instructions on the printed materials that came with the new battery stated that the old battery had to be drained prior returning. Suggested ways to do this: play a dvd, play a CD or play the Chess game computer vs. computer.

The battery is a potential fire hazard... so the best thing to do, to make things easier for Apple, is to prolong the possibility that it will will spontaneously combust.

Awesome opossum.

]]>
Consumerist-209891 Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:14:22 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=209891&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sony Sorta Sorry For Flaming Batteries ]]> "We are sorry for the offense caused by the battery recall..."

CT: "We would like to take this opportunity to apologize for the worries," Sony Corporate Executive Officer Yutaka Nakagawa said, bowing slightly with two other executives at a news conference at a Tokyo hotel.

The executives were seated while they bowed and did not bow deeply standing as most Japanese executives generally do in public apologies for troubles at their companies, underlining how Sony has been reluctant to admit fault in the troubles with its laptop batteries."

"...but not the exploding batteries themselves."

How deeply would they bow to the guy whose laptop exploded while sitting on pile of live ammunition?

]]>
Consumerist-209765 Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:19:26 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=209765&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sony Recalls Gateway, Sony, Toshiba, Fujitsu Batteries ]]> Monday, Sony launched a voluntary recall of laptop batteries for the manufacturer's listed in the headline of this post. If you own a notepad made by one of these people, check this chart to see if you computer is affected.

340,000 American laptop owners? This is Sony bowing to you slightly, from a sitting position.

]]>
Consumerist-209944 Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:42:09 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=209944&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ No, Dell Ain't Charging For Replacement Batteries ]]> Contrary to the vituperations of Lowell G, Dell is not charging people for swapping out their exploding batteries.

Rather, Dell auto-generates what appears to be an invoice, but is actually just part of their internal documentation system. An email Dell sent reader Andy, who also participated in the battery replacement program, explains:

Separately, you may receive what appears to be an invoice for your replacement battery. Please disregard this document which was automatically generated by the tool for standard replacement parts. Batteries replaced as part of this recall are provided at no charge to you.

Although we would probably get a kick out of the video Lowell promised, it's not necessary to blow up any of your computers in protest. Just toss that piece of paper in the trash and go back to building your twenty-foot potato cannon.

UPDATE: In our rush to correct ourselves, we forgot to mention something very important. Luckily, reader Thomas C. did it for us:

"I'm sorry, but saying "ignore our emails that look like invoices because they're automatically generated" is INCREDIBLY stupid. They're automatically generated? Gosh. Then stop automatically fucking generating them. Fix your process, Dell! Quit confusing your customers. Quit putting the burden on them to figure this crap out for you and do your job for you. It's YOUR job, not theirs. Jesus."
]]>
Consumerist-208410 Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:59:32 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=208410&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dell Charging Users For Recalled Exploding Laptop Batteries? ]]> UPDATE: No, they're not.

When you're Dell and your laptops start spontaneously exploding, even taking out trucks and houses in the conflagration, it only takes every single site on the net posting pictures of the fires to prod you into doing the responsible thing and initiating a recall.

But recalls are expensive. How best to recoup losses? Heck, why not charge the customers?

Lowel G. wrote us with a rather horrifying story of being sent an invoice for his recalled Dell battery. Worse yet, he can't get any response from Dell, who claim that every time something leaves the warehouse — recall or not — they send out an invoice. And, no doubt, many hapless suckers pay them.

Shame on Dell. First, they sell you a hand grenade instead of a laptop; then, they invoice you when you aren't willing to pull out the pin with your teeth and drop it down your pants. Lowel's email, after the jump.

You can see the the look of surprise, or should I say a look of crazed madness on my face after receiving a billing statement from Dell for a battery they recalled.

About a month after Dell started recalling the laptop batteries a friend told me that Dell was recalling laptop batteries and if I had checked mine to see if it was on their list. To my shock and horror my battery was on their list! But why didn't they call me, email me, or send a letter in the mail about the recall? Ok, so I went to their web site and put my info into their system so that I could receive a new battery.

Two days later the battery arrived. Wow, that was fast, But wait a month later I received a billing statement in the mail showing I owed Dell $74.92 for the recalled battery replacement.

So being the crazed madman that I am when It comes to companies that down right screw up, I called Dell asking why I received a bill for the replacement battery. The Dell customer service representative, Chinese I think, no Indian, Oh wait it was........ Hell I don't know what the customer service representative was, but all I know was I had the worst experience trying to get this woman to understand my problem.

After about 40 minutes on the phone with her I threatened to take my computers and blow them up, and then go out and by a Mac. For some reason she started understanding my problem, and stated that any time a product leaves their warehouse that an invoice is generated (I wonder how many people paid that invoice). Boy, I flipped out on her after hearing that, and asked to speak to a manager so that I could file a complaint. Of course She started having a hard time understanding me again. 20 minutes later she finally told me that I would have to call back on a Monday because no manger was available on Friday's and that I could make my complaint then.

Of course being unsatisfied with that answer, and like I said before, being the crazed madman that I am when It comes to companies that down right screw up, I went to Dell's web site to get a "contact us" email address write to and file a complaint. Once again, I got the run around, but this time it was on their web site. Finally I found a way to contact them (you know those "leave your comments" boxes) So I sent in my complaint through their site.

I received an email back right away (automated ~e-mail Dell should have sent to tell me about the recall in the first place ~ see attachment). So I waited, and I waited, and I waited, for a real reply, finally I received an e-mail back from Dell (See attachment). Now I am pissed off more than ever before and was wondering if you folks could help me out by finding an address to the President or an upper level so that I can write and file a formal complaint. If I can get an address and write to them and still get no satisfaction, then I'll make a video of me blowing up all my Dell computers (3) plus my wife's laptop, and my sons laptop (five Dell's total) which I'll send to Dell. Then I'll go buy HP, Compact or other type computers. Really makes me wonder how long stuff like this has been going on with Dell, and how may people actually paid those invoices! I think I'll send them a invoice for $74.92 for my time being wasted!

]]>
Consumerist-208360 Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:06:41 EDT consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=208360&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 6,000 Panasonic Laptops Recalled ]]> letsnote.jpgOut of concern that the batteries might combust, Panasonic announced a recall of Japanese models of CF-W4G Let's Note W4 laptop sold between April and May 2005.

According to Gizmodo, they "will only malfunction if you smash it on a table...and...a spring in the battery latch [punctures] the battery."

What a concept, recall the batteries before they explode in users hands.

]]>
Consumerist-198715 Wed, 06 Sep 2006 06:33:54 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=198715&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Please Copy 415 Serial Numbers To Complete Your Apple Battery Recall ]]> Paul is the tech guy at an all-Mac private school and he's more steaming than a self-immolating battery.

415 of the computers under his domain] need battery replacements. Apple said that to process his request he needs to "supply them with the serial number from each and every battery and iBook in spreadsheet form to make the swap."

This bothers him. He says, "I'll get right on that Apple, in the copious amounts of spare time that I have! I'm supposed to drop everything I'm doing and spend hours rectifying a screwup that I am the victim of. Bastards!"

While the magnitude be staggering, we're not sure what else Apple is supposed to do. Maybe Paul can get the school to offer students extra credit for helping you transcribe? We're surprised there isn't some nice, curvy Mac app that can "sense" which machines are affected and iNtuit the serial numbers into a multimedia mashup.

]]>
Consumerist-196664 Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:45:06 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=196664&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dell Has Something Important to Tell The Consumerist About Blazing Batteries ]]> Seems our lil ol blog has finally raised the ire of Dell. A day that will go down in history. John Q. Pope, acting as media relator for Dell, wants to correct a post of ours, "Dell Battery Recall May Not End Explosions."

Everyone is entitled to an opinion but they should not get in the way of facts. Dell does not design its products as you report. Dell, the acting head of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and others are on record as saying the root cause of the battery issue is a Sony manufacturing issue — and not a Dell design issue. If that is not enough, then perhaps Apple's recall today of 1.8 million Sony batteries will drive home reality. Speaking for Dell, we have worked very closely with Sony, are confident they have they rectified the problem, and we have every confidence in their batteries going forward.

Pope, thank you for reaching out. Now the niceties are out of the way... Dell doesn't design its own products? Well then who does? Guess that's one way to keep costs down.

Just kidding, we are deliberately misconstruing your comment for comedic effect.

But seriously, what then do you make of what a Sony spokesman says to Consumer Affairs at the bottom of this article? ""We believe the fire was caused by the combination of batteries and system architecture."

Question mark.

Second Question. Beyond what others are saying, is Dell saying that architecture in no way contributed to the battery fires?

At Pope's request, we're extending a comments invite so perhaps we have a new comments participant.

]]>
Consumerist-196485 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:20:00 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=196485&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apple Battery Exchange Call Center Kinda Busy Right now ]]>

Due to overwhelming popular demand, the Apple Battery Program site was down for a bit. Banuba was forced to phone the call center to find his computer was affected.

"After 18:25 on hold, a CSR named Tim answered the phone, by leaving dead air and the sound of a call center for almost 30 seconds while I—sounding manly and not like a moron at all—said "helloooooooo" repeatedly into dead air."

Eventually Tim came back but it was all for naught. The Apple reps are using the same website to diagnose and process battery exchanges. Could he please try his call again later, maybe in an hour or two?

Of course, either of them could have looked in this handy chart provided by some guys calling themselves the Consumer Product Safety Commission or some such nonsense.

]]>
Consumerist-196479 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:58:36 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=196479&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apple Recalls G4 Batteries ]]>

Apple announced a recall of 1.8 million laptop batteries.

If you own a 12 or 15-inch PowerBook G4, or a 12-inch iBook G4, check the serial number against the ones listed at http://support.apple.com/batteryprogram. You can request a replacement battery there or call (800) 275-2273

The recall news comes "hot on the heels" of Dell & Sony's battery recall last week.

"Apple Recalls Batteries" [CPSC] (Thanks to Tim & Jay!)

]]>
Consumerist-196441 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:10:46 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=196441&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dell Battery Recall May Not End Explosions ]]> dell3.jpgEven if you sent your Dell battery back before it could explode and tear off half your face, you still may not be in the clear. Some computer engineers are pointing out that computer architecture might have just as much to do with the exploding Dell laptop.

"You need to know how much energy the computer extracts from the battery, and how a system is designed to manage the current flow that generates heat inside the battery. Knowing the limitation at the critical temperature is important," said the improbably named Bodo Arlt, publisher of Bodo's Power Systems Magazine in Germany.

The problem with the architecture is that Dell places the battery near the hottest areas of the computer, where as other laptop companies try to put it someplace... you know.... cooler. Where it won't explode.And, of course, there is no thermometer that automatically shuts down the computer either.

As if to emphasize the rareness of a battery defect causing a Dell to explode, the truck of Thomas Forqueran was burnt to a cinder by a laptop not recalled by Dell. But "Sony screwed up their batteries" is always a better excuse than "We don't know how to make our product."

Dell Battery Recall May Not Be The Answer [Consumer Affairs]

]]>
Consumerist-196396 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:06:03 EDT consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=196396&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Things That Disquieted Us in Today's Business News ]]> RiteAid buys Brooks and Eckerd. Choose the path of light, be ye not like Walgreen's.
• Ministry of Japan, which is not a band, orders Sony and Dell to investigate blazin' batteries. Unverified sources claim the prime minister is curious as to whether batteries can fly single seater jets.
• Communist party branches open in Walmarts across China. Capitalism and Communism slated for giant fuckfest. 9 months later, they birth a baby. A baby named Apocalypse.
• Adventures in obvious headlines, "Wall Street escapes crime crackdown: Investment bankers largely avoid charges."
• Ok, so maybe she's a winsome pixie and the Orleagian snowballs are, "fluffy concoctions of ice, flavor and condensed milk so delicate they immediately begin to puddle in the heat," and he's a post-Katrina entrepreneurial success story... but how's their customer service? Huh? HUH?
• McDonald's number two man quits via flameout email screed. Grimace gets the nod.

]]>
Consumerist-196347 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:07:30 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=196347&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Broken Watch, Missing Watch, Stolen Watch? ]]> pdss009070.jpgIf there's one technical support job that even the dimmest of bulbs can flick the rope of drool off of their pendulous lower lip to get, it has to be watch battery replacement. Any fool can do it; ask all of my stoner friends in high school, who all worked at the same mall watch repair pagoda.

Still, even though watch battery replacement is the career choice endorsed by the National Down Syndrome Congress, mistakes can happen. Things can break. When that happens, we're usually understanding, but we expect resolution. Unless we're at Dakota Watch Pagoda in the Springfield Mall, in which case, we expect our expensive watch to promptly be squirreled away and never seen again.

Mike B. writes about a fubared watch battery replacement and his MIA watch after the jump:

On the 4th of June I noticed my watch battery in my Diesel watch was dead. I was in close proximity to a Dakota Watch pagoda in the Springfield Mall, so I asked the girl behind the counter if they replaced batteries on all kinds of watches. She said that they did and that it would be about 10 minutes, so I handed mine to her and browsed the cases.

About 15 minutes later she turns around and with the most sheepish look on her face says: "I've never,like, replaced a battery in this kind of watch before, and I noticed the pin was like, placed in there funny, and when I went to pull it out it
like, broke... I'm sooooo sorry, and we'll send it off to get repaired and stuff."

I was angry that she broke my watch, but at least she owned up to her mistake and was willing to fix it, even if it did involve sending it away for 4 weeks. I may not have even been that upset but it was a $150 watch and it was a birthday gift, so it holds a great deal of sentimental value to me. She wrote me a claim ticket, which had a "promise date" of July 4 on it as the date it was due back.

July 4 comes and goes with no call. I called back and spoke to a woman who I later would know as Vanessa Twiman, the store manager. She informed me of the
store's policy to only send out shipments on Mondays, and that since the girl broke my watch on a Tuesday, it had to sit and wait for 6 days before it would even
leave their store. The "promise date" on my order had moved to the 10th, without any sort of notification.

Fast forward to today, the 10th. I call back because I've not heard my phone ring, and UPS and FexEx both have pretty much made the rounds today. Once again
Vanessa is there with the same story, only this time the store just did inventory yesterday and didn't get a shipment today. (I'm not sure how any of this is my
problem, but ok.)

So, now I'm left without my watch, 5 weeks later, and I'm dealing with this woman who hasn't once apologized for her employee breaking it in the first place, hasn't tried to accomodate me at all, and hasn't made any effort outside of the exact letter of her DOR to see that my watch comes back in a timely fashion. I'm forwarding this email to the customer service email at Dakota as well.

]]>
Consumerist-186400 Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:00:44 EDT consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=186400&view=rss&microfeed=true