<![CDATA[Consumerist: Bacteria]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Bacteria]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/bacteria http://consumerist.com/tag/bacteria <![CDATA[ Recall: 286,000 lbs of Meat Used In Sandwich Wraps Contaminated With Listeria ]]> Gourmet Boutique, of Queens, NY is recalling 286,000 lbs of possibly contaminated meat used in sandwich wraps and other ready-to-eat products, says the USDA. This is the second recall of this type for the company. In March they recalled 7,000 lbs of meat for possible listeria contamination.

Inspectors found the listeria contaminated products during microbiological sampling in Florida, and there have been no illnesses reported. Over a dozen different products are affected by the recall and you can view a list by clicking here (PDF).

Listeria is a bacteria that causes the possibly-fatal infection "listeriosis." The USDA has classified this recall as "Class I" meaning that there is a “reasonable probability that the use of the product will cause serious, adverse health consequences or death."

NEW YORK FIRM RECALLS MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS
FOR POSSIBLE LISTERIA CONTAMINATION (PDF)
[USDA]

]]>
Mon, 05 May 2008 09:49:45 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5007838&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Beware Dirty Lemon Wedges At Restaurants ]]> con_onedirtylemon.jpg The slightly alarmist HealthInspections.com has a story about dirty lemon wedges in restaurants—apparently they're a "witch's brew of bacteria," to use the hilariously over-the-top language of the video narrator, who speaks in a parody of a newscaster voice. Our favorite trick of theirs: overlaying gigantic bacteria animations on everyday objects, as you can see in this screen capture. But anyway, the point is a microbiologist from New Jersey found various bacteria on three quarters of the lemons she tested from 21 different restaurants: "The very first sample that we took was loaded with fecal bacteria."

con_zimasprofloving.jpgProfessor Loving's study found "25 different microorganisms" in all, and at the end of the video she says it's "not necessarily cause for alarm" but that "you might want to be aware that the lemon slices have the potential to make you sick."

Snopes has posted a page on the topic, saying that while the bacteria is real, the threat hasn't been conclusively determined:

However, this study in itself doesn't demonstrate that restaurant patrons are at high risk for contracting some serious illnesses due to food workers' not observing sufficiently rigorous sanitary standards. For one thing, the study did not determine the origins of the microbial contaminants. The study also did not determine the likelihood of customers' contracting infectious diseases from restaurant-served lemon wedges, nor did it cite any examples of such an occurrence. What the study uncovered, basically, is a potential problem that requires more study.

(Thanks to Paul!)

"Lemon With Your Drink? Restaurant Lemons Are Loaded With Germs" [HealthInspections.com via Wise Bread]

RELATED
"Lemon Aid" [Snopes]
"Scientific Study: Double Dipping Is As Gross As You Think It Is"
(Video capture: HealthInspections.com)
(Hypothetical image of Dr. Loving: Invader Zim)

]]>
Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:58:12 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=359089&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ California's Raw Milk Suppliers Soured By Tough Bacteria Standards ]]> California dairies are bristling under regulations that limit the amount of yucky coliform bacteria allowed in raw milk. The new health standards set a maximum of 10 coliforms per milliliter, which upsets Mark McAfee, the founder of California's largest raw milk dairy. According to McAfee, "There's quite a ruckus right now." Let's see how he frames the issue.

"This is a huge issue and it goes directly to consumer choice. Consumers are fed up with the government being in their kitchens and they want to be able to make their independent choices about food they want to eat."
Consumer choice is good, right? But doesn't raw milk make people sick? The helpful folks at BarfBlog point out: "before widespread adoption of milk pasteurization, an estimated 25 per cent of all foodborne and waterborne outbreaks of disease were associated with milk."

What does California, that kitchen-occupier of a state, have to say for itself?

"We found that coliform count is indicative of a healthy and clean and wholesome production process for raw milk," said Steve Lyle, spokesman for the California Department of Food and Agriculture.
Raw milk may contain salmonella, E. coli, campylobacter and listeria. If you want to guzzle a tall fresh glass of bacteria, go for it, proud American. But please offer pasteurized milk to your kids.

Raw milk producers soured on new rules [AP]
(Photo: foxypar4)

]]>
Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:55:55 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=337923&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ FDA: Glow In The Dark Shrimp "Not A Food Safety Issue" ]]> Seattle shoppers want to know why the FDA won't investigate bioluminescent shrimp appearing at local Thriftways and Quality Food Centers.

The glowing shrimp have yet to sicken anyone, according to the FDA, and are just as safe as colored ketchup. One Thriftway manager said: "We don't hear a lot of complaints about glowing seafood, but then people rarely look at their shrimp and crab in the dark."

However, [the manager] admits that he might "take a peek" at the seafood now and then in a darkened freezer "just in case."

A caller who identified herself only as Barbara told the Seattle P-I on Monday that she had given some cooked shrimp she bought at the QFC in Wallingford to her three "very large" cats Sunday night as a "birthday treat."

An hour later, she said, she was frightened at what she found. She saw a greenish-blue glow coming from the cat bowl on the darkened porch. When she turned on the light, she found the six shrimp untouched. Her porky cats, which she said "would eat your leg off if you stood in one place long enough," didn't touch them.

She pulled open the refrigerator door. The light bulb had burned out weeks ago, she said, but the plastic bag holding the remaining shrimp glowed brightly in the chilled darkness.

Neither Peters nor Barbara, who also ate some of the shrimp, said they were made ill, just a bit queasy at the idea of consuming the glowing seafood.

Skittish consumers can boil the shrimp to kill off the bioluminescent bacteria phosphoreum that makes their shrimp awesome and creepy.

Glow-in-the-dark shrimp — it's all a little fishy [Seattle PI via Slashfood]
(Photo: Edith Widder/Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution)

]]>
Sat, 03 Nov 2007 09:31:06 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=318533&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ FDA Warns Consumers Not To Eat Certain Raw Oysters From Washington State ]]> The FDA has issued a warning not to eat raw oysters from the southern tip of Hood Canal in Washington state. Oysters from the Hood Canal have been linked to an outbreak of vibriosis, a rare illness caused by the Vibrio parahaemolyticus bacteria.

The symptoms of vibriosis are: "watery diarrhea, often with abdominal cramping, nausea, vomiting, fever, and chills. Usually these symptoms occur within 24 hours of ingestion and last no more than three days."

If you think you have vibriosis and have eaten Hood Canal oysters, tell your health department and see a doctor. The illness is rarely serious in people who do not have weakened immune systems.

So far, only 6 people have become ill from the oysters in California and Washington, but they were distributed to the following locations: California, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, New York, Oregon, Washington, British Columbia (Canada), Hong Kong, Malaysia, and Singapore.

If you've recently purchased oysters, you should find out where they were grown. The FDA says cooking the oysters will kill the bacteria, but what fun is that?

Consumers Warned to Avoid Eating Raw Oysters from Southern Tip of Hood Canal in Washington State [FDA]

(Photo:bathany1122)

]]>
Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:48:58 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=288389&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Evian Water Rejected By China For Containing "Excessive Amounts Of Bacteria" ]]> 118 tons of Evian mineral water has been seized and impounded by Chinese Health Inspectors because it contained "excessive amounts of bacteria." China has a different standard for bacteria than the one set by the World Health Organization and Evian does not make the cut.

Evian now joins KFC, Proctor and Gamble and Walmart on the list of foreign companies that have recently had products banned from China for health concerns. —MEGHANN MARCO

China seizes 118 tons of Evian water [International Herald Tribune]
(Photo: Beige Alert)

]]>
Wed, 30 May 2007 10:16:46 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=264428&view=rss&microfeed=true