<![CDATA[Consumerist: Annoying]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Annoying]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/annoying http://consumerist.com/tag/annoying <![CDATA[ Christmas Creep: Radio Stations Are In Full Holiday Mode ]]> If you thought that you could avoid Christmas Creep by staying out of stores — think again. It's annoying you on the radio as well.

Reader Matt says:

I'm probably one of the biggest fans of the Christmas holiday on the planet but the spirit isn't typically shown after Thanksgiving. I've gotten a few laughs on how many stores started with the Christmas Creep extremely early this year. Well it extends beyond the stores. After dropping my fiancee off at Logan Airport this morning, which is in Boston for those not familiar with the area, I started scanning the radio to find some decent tunes. And what did I find on Oldies 103.3? You guessed it Christmas music. When I got home and took a look at their website, http://www.oldies1033.com/ , it really put the icing on the cake. The "holiday season" has gotten out of control this year and I just wanted to share my experience with you guys.

]]>
Consumerist-5082067 Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:23:15 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5082067&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Christmas Creep Confessions: We Played Christmas Music On Halloween ]]> An anonymous reader, who works at a certain bookstore, says that her manager started playing Christmas music a week before Halloween... and on Halloween itself.

My manager began playing Christmas music the week before Halloween. I've had numerous customers come up to me and complain.. saying we're pushing to much into the season. The music continues to play, nonstop. We only stopped for a short hour or two on Halloween to play Michael Jackson's "Thriller" a couple of times. Christmas is here, at Borders Books and Music in Massachusetts.

]]>
Consumerist-5077151 Wed, 05 Nov 2008 10:34:49 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5077151&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Some electronics didn't get the news that ... ]]> Some electronics didn't get the news that Daylight Saving Time ends Nov 2 — and automatically "fell back" this Sunday. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 changed both the starting and ending dates of Daylight Saving, “springing” the first date forward to the second Sunday in March and pushing the closing back until the first Sunday in November. [WZVN]

]]>
Consumerist-5069182 Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:48:11 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5069182&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Merry September! Christmas Is In Full Swing At Rite Aid! ]]> Halloween is about a month away, but it's too late to start thinking about that now. You've got Christmas crap to buy!

Reader Aaron says:

Today I was in Rite Aid in Bellport, NY with my wife getting her prescription filled. When we walked down an aisle, I was greeted by a nice, long display of Christmas decorations and items to purchase! I groaned and told my wife how it is just obscene and obnoxious to have this stuff out when it's September and I'm still wearing shorts. I mean, Halloween is still a month away!

Anyhow, I share in your anger of how a single day out of 365 is exploited beyond belief.

Aaron, you're just lazy. By today's standards, you should have been buying your Halloween decorations two months ago. Get with the program!

]]>
Consumerist-5056261 Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:54:54 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5056261&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Christmas Wrapping Paper Spotted At Walgreens ]]> Reader James says he spotted this Christmas-themed wrapping paper lurking on the top shelf at Walgreens, waiting to strike...

Most agree that AFTER Thanksgiving should be the start of the CHRISTMAS season, but this idea has been lost on retail for a long, long time.

I spotted this wrapping paper at Walgreens, and although its on the unreachable top shelf and probably just overflow from the stock room, I definitely think it qualifies.


Christmas Creep at Walgreens
[FutureGringo]

]]>
Consumerist-5041371 Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:25:00 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5041371&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ McDonald's Charges More For Sweet Tea With Anything Less Than A "Full" Cup Of Ice ]]> Reader Greg had his first run in with the notorious "no ice" fee, something we've been hearing about more and more lately. This time the culprit was McDonald's and they got around the "Ok, fine. I'll just have one cube of ice" tactic with a sign that specified a "FULL" cup of ice. Clever, McDonald's. Very. Clever.

Greg says:

So I decided on my lunch break from work I wanted some Mc Donald's.... I went into this new store for the first time and well.... here's my email to Mc Donald's corporate....

I visited this store for the first time. I placed my regular order and when I said "and a Sweet Tea with no ice" I got met with resistance from the cashier and manager. The cashier called over her manager and they spoke in spanish, not english like I was speaking. The manager then said it was $1.69 for the sweet tea even though right above her head it say $1. She claimed it was because I didn't want ice. I stated at every other restaurant I have never been charged 69 cents for "having it my way" without ice. She then pointed to a sign hung on the wall that stated " $1 Sweet Tea with ice only otherwise regular price". First, I never knew Sweet Tea had any other price than $1 and the big sign behind didn't show that. So I then said "Ok, I'll take ice in my drink, 1 ice cube will be enough." She then said it has to be totally full of ice, and then pointed to a different sign that said "$1 Sweet Tea with FULL cup of ice only. Otherwise regular price. No Refills."

For as long as I have been buying food at Mc Donald's I have never been charged for not taking ice. Thats like charging me 50 cents because I don't want mustard on my burger.
Is this normal practice? Is this a new rule about sweet tea? If so I am very disappointed in Mc Donald's and your marketing strategies.

PS. I also do have photos of the two signs they used as proof to try to charge me more money.

I am yet to hear back from Mc Donald's and doubt they will say or do anything in regards to this, but I think its getting a little outrageous how these companies can just start adding fees and surcharges for something as simple as no ice.... Its not like an employee has to stand there with two forks and manually grab the ice out of my cup, just don't put it in to begin with.... shouldn't they give me a discount for not having to spend the time to put the ice in the cup...?

Oh, no, Greg. Don't you see? You're not paying the fee for "convenience," you're just a dirty scammer who was trying to get a tiny amount of "Sweet Tea" for free. McDonald's is on to your little game. You'll take your ice and like it! Oh, wait. Have you tried asking for your ice "on the side?"

In any case, Greg says that the two signs were tucked away in non-obvious locations. He says the one pictured here was "behind the work area of the employees on a side wall at about 7 feet high" nowhere near the menu. Sneaky.

]]>
Consumerist-5035625 Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:37:45 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5035625&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ It's July, Time To Put Out The Christmas Decorations... ]]> Reader Kelly wants to let us know that July isn't too early for a candle store at her local mall to start its Christmas marketing push...

Last night during a leisurely stroll through the mall, I happened to snap a shot of the Christmas Creep in a storefront window. And it's only July! The picture is pretty crappy — I took it with my Blackberry, but I thought I would share it anyway. You know, there's only 148 days until Christmas!

Nooooooooo. Christmas Creep in July? We realize they're probably trying to be funny, but for some reason we still find it depressing.

]]>
Consumerist-5031452 Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:52:43 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031452&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dear Home Depot: I Do Not Want To Hear About Your Special Promotion For Home Owners ]]> Reader G writes in to let Home Depot know that he's really, really tired of hearing about their "special promotion for home owners" while he's trying to shop.

I wanted to share a recent annoyance at 2 Home Depot locations. The first occurrence I was actually a little surprised when an HD associate approached me, I assumed with would be the usual "Finding everything". But it was an attempt to interest me in the special promotion for home owners they're running. Apparently its some service with Trane to inspect your home air conditioning. Fortunately there was a sucker beside of me who spoke up and I moved along. A few minutes later and a few asile away who do i see coming but the promotion guy. Again I get the "did you hear about our new promotion". Wow, yes and still not interested. Even though I was quite annoyed I didn't think that much about it until at a second store a few days later same sales pitch. That's enough for me, I'm not going to shop where I'm going to be bothered with these pitches.

Submitted to HD's customer support form:
Over the last week I've had the occasion to be in 2 different stores in the Charlotte area several times(Steele Creek #3662 and S Boulevard Charlotte #3646). At each location while I was trying to find my items and continue with my daily life I was approached by an HD representative who wanted to tell me bout the special promotion for Home Owners. Apparently this is some attempt to sale AC services with Trane. I have to say how annoying this is that I can't simply shop at your stores in peace, I'm going to be accosted for hard sales of services. This is not acceptable to me and will make me hesitant to return to a Home Depot store in the future. Regards.

We suspect that stores like Home Depot underestimate how annoying these sales pitches can be. Has a store ever lost your business because their sales force pestered you to sign up for membership cards, credit cards, or special promotions too often? Who are the worst offenders? Let us know in the comments and we'll round up the best stories in another post.

(Photo: Den-Mod )

]]>
Consumerist-5011339 Wed, 28 May 2008 10:57:55 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5011339&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Policy: Blockbuster Debits $1 To Test Your Card, Then Charges You For Your Rental ]]> For every debit or credit card transaction at Blockbuster, the company will now debit $1 to "test" your card. If the transaction goes through, they'll then debit the full amount of your purchase. Blockbuster tells us your dollar will be returned in 3-10 business days. Reader Jason says he rented a game on Thursday and hasn't gotten the dollar Blockbuster borrowed back yet. Will he get it before the 10 days is up?

Jason writes:

On Thursday I went to Blockbuster and rented a videogame for 8.47$. The next day I checked my online statement to find out that I was charged 8.47$, and then another separate transaction from Blockbuster for 1$. Considering the guy behind the counter had no idea what he was doing at the time I figured he made a mistake and called the Blockbuster back to investigate. They informed me that it is a relatively new policy on all in-store rentals for debit/credit cards in which before charging you the rental for the game, they first bill your card $1 to make sure that it is active, then they bill the rental in addition to that. The manager I spoke to said that they refund the $1 at a later date, but here I am almost a week later with no refund. If this is even legal, why not just charge the $1, and if it works, charge the normal rental price subtract the $1?

Ugh.

(Photo: Seth W )

]]>
Consumerist-5010265 Wed, 21 May 2008 14:58:36 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5010265&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Chase Telemarketing Tactics: Try Being Sneaky, Then Launch Vague Threats ]]> A reader writes in to share his traumatic experience with a Chase telemarketer who first tried to sneak a sale into the one-way conversation, then launched into scare tactics like asking, "What are you going to do when someone steals your identity?" R. writes, "I feel like I need protection from Chase's employees."

Earlier today I got a call from a Chase telemarketer.  He called to inform me about a great Fraud Protection service.  The caller vaguely described what was covered over the next minute as he read his prepared script.  Toward the end of the script, he said that Chase would be sending an informational brochure and that I would have the opportunity to review the information with my family before I proceeded with the purchase of the Fraud Protection service.
 
At this point, I initiated the end of the conversation by saying: "I'll review the materials when it comes in the mail".
 
Chase telemarketer mumbled: "Ok, I'll charge you $7 and ship the information out to [Address]".
 
I cut him off mid sentence and asked him to repeat and clarify to make sure what just happened.  He indeed signed me up without my permission.
 
I proceeded to tell him "NO" in a strong and firm voice.  "I did not agree to pay anything, I did not agree for any service".
 
I politely requested that he send me the information, and not sign me up for the fraud protection.
 
At this point, I was about to hang up the phone when he came back with "Mr. XXXX, don't you know that some one's identity is stolen every 4 minutes"
 
I replied, "No, I don't want the service"
 
Chase telemarketer rudely cuts me off: "but Mr.  XXXX, what are you going to do when someone steals your identity?"
 
"No, Didn't you hear me?"
 
Chase telemarketer cuts me off again, "but you arent safe...."
 
I slam the phone down.
 
You just lost another customer Chase.
 
Now I have to call back and make sure that he didn't sign me up.  I feel like I need protection from Chase's employees from stealing my identity rather than some stranger who might steal my credit card or something to that effect.

(Photo: jebb)

]]>
Consumerist-5008001 Wed, 07 May 2008 10:14:34 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5008001&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ United Airlines Will Not Let You Report Your Damaged Baggage For "Security Reasons" ]]> Reader Sid is having a hell of a time reporting some damaged luggage to United Airlines.

He writes:

On a recent flight, on United Airlines, I had my suitcase damaged. When I reported it to the United baggage office in Portland, OR, they apologized for not having the proper form on which to report the problem and suggested that I contact the United baggage office at one of the airports in my home city, Washington, DC. Upon returning home, I attempted to contact United's baggage department by phone. The "800" number was of no help, nor was the "Customer Service" call center in India. When I called the Washington Metropolitan Airports Authority in an attempt to obtain the telephone number for one of the United baggage offices, I was told that United had instructed them not to release the number FOR SECURITY REASONS!

I have written to the VP of Customer Affairs at United to congratulate him on following the example of the now defunct Soviet Union which had no telephone books for security reasons.

Sid

We checked United's policy on damaged luggage and it seems that the first baggage office screwed you with bad advice. From United's website:

Please report any damage to your baggage immediately after retrieving your baggage from the baggage claim carousels. A customer service representative at our Baggage Service Offices will be happy to complete a damage report for you. Please have your passenger ticket receipt and claim check available when filing your claim. All baggage claims must be reported within 24 hours of travel.

You've already launched an EECB of sorts, so all we can really suggest is that you also file a complaint with the Department of Transportation and CC: it to Graham Atkinson at United.

Filing official complaints with the government will sometimes reduce the time it takes for an airline to get around to dealing with your complaint. You might also try filing your complaint in person, again, but we could understand why you might not want to trek out to the airport with your luggage.

(Photo: Ben Popken )

]]>
Consumerist-5007860 Mon, 05 May 2008 14:16:17 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5007860&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dear T-Mobile: Please Stop Sending 5 Text Messages At 5 AM Every Month To Say That My Billing Cycle Has Started ]]> http://consumerist.com/assets/resources/2008/04/Annoying%20Text%20Messages-thumb.jpgDustin is angry and tired because T-Mobile sends him five text messages at 5 a.m. on the 11th of every month to let him know that his billing cycle has started. He asked T-Mobile to stop sending the useless message, but they insist that the texts are a "feature" that can't be disabled. Their solution? "Put [the] phone on silent on the 10th of every month."

T-Mobile's heart is in the right place. What they need is another feature, one that lets you disable their annoyingly useless text message reminders.

]]>
Consumerist-378833 Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:10:18 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=378833&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ WaMu Enrolls You In A Program Without Permission, Then Charges An ETF ]]> Reader Michael signed up for a new free checking account with WaMu and the person who opened the account for him (accidentally?) enrolled Michael in some sort of bullshit coupon program that costs $5 a month. Now WaMu has charged him a $10 early termination fee and is refusing to refund it.

While searching for bank to open up my first checking and savings account, I decided to take WaMu up on its much-advertised free checking account offer. Unfortunately, that decision left me with a $5 monthly fee.

For some unknown reason, when I first opened up my account at a local WaMu branch a week and a half ago I was also simultaneously enrolled in the "Plus Package" program. I'm not sure if it's standard practice for bank representatives to enroll new customers in the program, but it's certainly an interesting twist on "free" accounts.

Within days of opening my account I noticed a $5 debit while reviewing my information online. The description read "PLUS PACKAGE MEMBERSHIP," which made it pretty easy to find out what was going on. I soon learned about all the fantastic benefits of membership from a terse entry on WaMu's website, including discounts on hotel accommodations and eyewear. No thanks

I went back to my local branch last Saturday and explained that I never consented to enrolling in the program and never received any information about it. The representative was very understanding and un-enrolled me from the program and refunded the $5. She speculated that the mistake may have been because they used to enroll people in the program for a free trial, a promotion which has since ceased. However, I would have also guessed that the old promotion at least included telling customers about the program — ya know, about the fees and benefits. Apparently not.

Unfortunately, I've also found out that there is a $10 early termination fee for leaving the program within 120 days of enrolling in it, so now I've gone from being out $5 to being out $10 for my new free account. I wrote an online message to customer service about the mix-up and a representative responded that there was "no bank error" and I would not be refunded. I've sent another message back in hopes of clarifying the situation and am awaiting a reply.

So far this has been a mediocre start to our new relationship. Way to go WaMu!


Michael writes to WaMu:
I was originally enrolled in this program without my knowledge and went back to my local bank less than a week after opening my account to un-enroll from the Plus Package program. The initial $5 monthly fee has since been refunded to my account but now I need this early termination fee to be refunded as well.

Thank you.


WaMu writes to Michael:
Dear Michael [redacted]:

Thank you for your email.

Washington Mutual takes responsibility for bank errors and will work with customers to resolve issues arising from those errors. Your concern has been researched, and as no bank error was found, the fee cannot be refunded.

I regret any inconvenience this may cause you.

We would not be shocked to learn that there's some sort of incentive for WaMu bankers to enroll hapless individuals such as yourself in this coupon program. Oooh, coupon programs with monthly fees make Consumerist very unhappy!

(Photo:bookish in north park)

]]>
Consumerist-364419 Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:59:02 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=364419&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Comfort Suite's Shady "Energy Surcharge" Costs You $144 ]]> Reader ds143 wrote in with a reminder to ask hotels about added fees before reserving a room. He booked a six-night stay at the Comfort Suites in the Bahamas for his family of four without realizing that the hotel levied a $6 per person, per night "energy surcharge." The financial sucker punch set ds143 back $144.

I know you already did a piece on strange hotel charges a little while ago, but I was in the Bahamas at the Comfort Suites in Atlantis and I thought this was so misleading I took a picture of it.

I just think it's outrageous-if it wasn't bad for the Earth, I might as well be leaving on all my lights when I leave the room, just to get my money's worth! I was with a family of 4, and we booked the hotel because it was cheap. However, they did not include this 24 dollar a night tax! We stayed for 6 nights-they jipped us of $144!

Hidden fees usually have little to do with actual consumption. If you spot them on your bill, it is worth speaking with the manager and asking to have them removed.

PREVIOUSLY: Watch Out For These 14 Hidden Hotel Fees
10 Annoying Hidden Hotel Fees

]]>
Consumerist-362768 Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:38:46 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=362768&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ When Someone With Your 15 Year Old Disconnected Phone Number Orders FiOS, You Get The Bill ]]> Reader Joan once had a phone number. 15 years ago, she disconnected it. Now she's being charged for someone else's FiOS and she's not happy about it. For the past 6 months she has called Verizon to ask that the error be fixed and each month she's been told that the stranger's FiOS has been removed from her bill and that she'll be credited for the error. It hasn't actually happened yet.

Joan launched an EECB and cc'd us so we could listen in:


I am a Verizon telephone, DSL and wireless subscriber [redacted].

I have been dealing with an erroneous billing situation and its severe customer service consequences for over six months. In September 2007, the owner of a telephone number I once owned (and disconnected 15 years ago) ordered FIOS. Since then, that person's FIOS charges have been appearing on my bills, despite different account numbers. The new owner's account number shows up on my bill as [redacted]. Since discovering the error, I've contacted customer service six times - once per month, beginning on September 21st. During those calls, I spoke to [redacted] and a few others whose names I've misplaced. Each of them assured me that the problem would be corrected immediately and that my bill would be credited immediately. In each case, this proved false.

My latest bill, dated February 7th, shows an overdue balance of $149.35 for this FIOS service, as well as a new $39.95 charge for another month of another person's FIOS. In understand from the bill that I not only am I being charged for the other account's FIOS, but I am being charged interest on an overdue balance that does not belong to me. Further, I have worked hard to ensure my excellent credit standing, and I am concerned that this issue is being reported to credit bureaus. This is clearly unacceptable and should be rectified immediately.

Satisfactory resolution of this issue would include the following:

1. All erroneous charges removed from my account
2. Separation of my account from the other person's account so that the charges do not reappear in the future
3. Assurance that this mistake has not been reported to a credit bureau (and if it has, assurance that a correction has been filed with the bureau
4. A credit on my next bill for the exceptionally unreasonable amount of time and energy I've had to expend in my efforts to have these charges removed.

Given that I have been pressing this issue for six months now, I will expect appropriate resolution within 48 hours.

Sincerely,

Joan
Great letter, Joan. For more information about how to learn to launch your own EECB, click here.

(Photo:JohnMarino92)

]]>
Consumerist-357108 Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:48:05 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=357108&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Despite Your Manly Bits, Art.com Signs You Up For Working Mother Magazine ]]> artdotlame.jpgReader Brian doesn't have a womb, so when he saw a copy of Working Mother magazine in his mailbox, he was pretty sure that he didn't order it:
Last December I placed an order at art.com for a framed print which I intended to give as a Christmas present. I placed the order well within art.com's recommended time frame for delivery in time for christmas. During the order they promised delivery by December 17th. Well, as you may guess December 17th came and went with no package (they shipped it on the 15th via DHL.) December 24th came and went with no package. DHL finally delivered it on the 26th after I had been forced to go out and purchase another gift to replace the one that had not arrived.

In the end I let it slide. I had no desire to deal with telephone customer service the week after Christmas to get my shipping money refunded from art.com. I had better things to do with my vacation time.

This week I come home and find an issue of "Working Mother" magazine in my mailbox. Thinking it was delivered by mistake to my box I check the address label. To my surprise I find that it is addressed to me. Having all the correct Male parts it is anatomically impossible for me to be a working mother so I was puzzled as to how I ended up with this subscription. I refused delivery of the magazine by writing "refused" on the label and leaving it in my mailbox with the flag up. Next I visited their website and put in an inquiry via an online form. Surprisingly they got back to me very quickly. The verdict? Art.com had signed me up for a complimentary subscription for one year. I certainly don't remember clicking anything during my order with them indicating that I might be interested in 12 issues of a magazine that I will throw directly into the trash every month. If I did leave a box checked or something it must not have been very conspicuous because I usually catch stuff like that.

Working Mother magazine canceled my "subscription" in response to my message to them.

As a postal customer I'm bombarded with a pile of junk mail every month. Shame on art.com for adding this mountain of waste.

Brian

Attention Art.com: People do not like unsolicited magazines randomly showing up at their door. Seriously. We are not making this up.

]]>
Consumerist-356464 Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:52:10 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=356464&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Best Buy: Name Your Own Price For This DVD ]]> Reader Jared says:

I was at Best Buy looking for 'The Fountain' on DVD. I found three copies in the drama section, and three different prices. No tricks here, no collector's / special editions. Just the standard widescreen version at name-your-own-price. Guess they're trying to emulate Radiohead?
Shhh! Don't give them any ideas.
]]>
Consumerist-354950 Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:49:06 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=354950&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Canceling Your MySpace Account Is F$%!@&*# Impossible ]]> myspacetrap.jpgReader Julian can't figure out how to cancel his MySpace account.

He's been trying for days with disappointing results:

I have tried 5-6 times in the last 3 days to cancel my MySpace account, and they don't appear to be allowing me to do so. Are they that worried about losing people to Facebook?

On their website, I was able to go through the "cancel account" rigmarole, only to be told that they would send me an email in which I there would be a URL I had to click on, in order to confirm my desire to cancel. I have not received any such emails from them, despite repeated attempts — not in my In Box, not in my Spam folder, nowhere.

I have sent two messages to customer service; the first one I got back an automated message telling me to follow the steps on their website that I had already done, and the second time I got an automated message saying someone would get back to me. That was a couple days ago.

You know, Consumerist itself had this problem once. The solution? We (actually, it was Ben,) uploaded porn to our profile over and over again until MySpace finally deleted it. We win.

How Do I Delete My Account? [MySpace]

]]>
Consumerist-345144 Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:09:24 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=345144&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ AT&T Will Not Leave You Alone At Your Non-Existent Address ]]> Poor Dustin. AT&T won't stop sending him junk mail at the wrong address. Sounds impossible, but one should never be too quick to judge with AT&T.

I have a situation which may interest you and for which I'm trying to find a little help. Essentially I have asked AT&T three times now to stop sending me junk mail and they keep sending me junk mail. The worst part is that it's not even to my right address. The worse-than-worst part is that it's for a service that isn't offered at my address! Full story below.

Not long after I moved into my apartment, I noticed that I got a lot of junk mail on a regular basis. Thursday was local coupon day, Tuesday was national coupon day, and every couple weeks or so I would receive something from AT&T. Now, the strange part about this mail is that it is not even going to my correct address—my street number ends in '4', this ends in '6'—but I get it anyway because the address they are addressing it to does not exist.

Well I didn't know who to contact about the coupon circulars I get in the mail, but I knew for sure that I could contact AT&T. So I did, and politely asked them to stop mailing me any more items. They said, "Ok" and I thought that was that.

Until I received the next piece of AT&T junk mail in my mailbox. It happened a couple more times before I got around to calling (you can only speak with someone during business hours and I usually don't get off work until after said hours). Again, they said, "No problem." Sure enough, more junk mail keeps coming in. Repeat this scenario again and that's where we stand now.

The most ironic part of all of this is that they are pushing the U-Verse service. Although I didn't want to reward them for their tactics, I have to admit the service did look appealing, so I went online to check it out. I plugged in my real address and I got back the message that U-Verse wasn't available in my area? What? Surely this is a mistake. I called them up to confirm and they told me that, yep, U-Verse is not available at my address ending in '4'. But what about the non-existent address whose mail I receive that ends in a '6'? Well, U-Verse is available at this imaginary place.

What do I do to get them to stop mailing me fliers I don't want for a service I can't get? Now that I've called them three times, is it time to ratchet it up? Is going to executive customer service even worth it for this kind of issue?

Thank you, Consumerist.

-Dustin

Maybe we're jerks but we'd be tempted to call up and order the service anyway, pretending we lived at the "6" address. Then on the day the tech was supposed to show up, we'd write "6" real big with a sharpie on like, a paper plate (or something equally ridiculous) and hang it outside to lure the guy in. This isn't a good idea or anything, it would just be funny.

Some other options:

1) Be like Ben. He calls and goes all Quentin Tarantino on his dentist, threatening to report them to the FTC. Meg is not really bothered by junk mail, because she enjoys using her paper shredder.

2) Try placing a big sign on your mailbox that says, "THIS IS NOT [whatever the incorrect address is] " You could also try writing "Incorrect address" and "return to sender" on the mail and then dropping back in the mail. We're not sure that this will actually do anything though. Any postal service employees care to offer some ideas that will actually work?

Anyone else have any ideas?

(Photo:hyku)

]]>
Consumerist-343918 Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:48:13 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=343918&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ There Is A Guy Living In The Paramus, New Jersey IKEA ]]> Remember that one guy who decided to visit all the Starbucks in NYC in 24 hours? Yeah, we'd forgotten about it, too. He's convinced IKEA to let him live in their Paramus, NJ store for a week while his apartment gets fumigated.

The result of this stunt is a website featuring short videos of Mark's adventures inside the IKEA that we felt were just little too irritating to actually watch, but maybe you'll like them.

Living in IKEA does sound sort of fun, though, we have to admit. That's probably why they're selling houses in Europe.

Man Lives At IKEA [CNN]
(Photo:CNN)

]]>
Consumerist-342440 Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:39:40 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=342440&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Get Rid Of Telemarketers, Debt Collectors, And Other Vermin With Phone Tones ]]> soundwaves.jpgChris recorded a little sound file onto his answering machine that stopped a debt collector robot that kept calling him, seeking people who didn't live there. This .WAV is the U.S. Special Information Tone signal for "vacant circuit", which signifies and out-of-service or nonexistant number. You know it better as "boo-boo-BOOP!" Chris recorded a new message on his answering machine with the tones at the beginning and the next time the robot called, it thought it was getting a dead line and dutifully erased the number from its system. Voila, automatons be gone. Some places have autodialers that don't (or have been tweaked) to respond to SIT tones, but if you've got a persistent unwanted robot caller, it's worth a shot.

SIT-VC.WAV [Art Of Hacking]

]]>
Consumerist-342357 Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:01:55 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=342357&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Easter Creep: Target Hauls Out The Easter Products On December 26 ]]> We'd love to tell you exactly what we yelled at our computer screen when we saw the above photograph, but it would probably set off your company's web filtering software.

Reader Jason writes:

I saw this at Target in Tinley Park, IL yesterday and thought it was funny. Guess it's never too early to start gearing up for Easter.
Forgive us, Target, but in fact it can be too early to start celebrating Easter. You know, technically.

Arrggghhhhh.

Please send us any "Easter Creep" photos by emailing them to tips@consumerist.com or submitting them to our Flickr pool with the tag "Easter Creep." Thanks.

(Photo:jb0)

]]>
Consumerist-338202 Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:23:40 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338202&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ "Injected Pork Water" Is Completely Out Of Control At Kroger ]]> "At our local supermarket chain (Kroger), it is now impossible to buy any fresh pork product (except sausage and bacon, but what's in them is a whole other story) that has not been "enhanced" by the injection of "up to 15%" of some kind of saltwater solution. Pork chops, pork loin, everything. And now chicken is getting this way, too - it is getting harder and harder to find any fresh chicken that has not been injected with "up to 15% chicken broth." Even bone-in legs and thighs, now. When did this happen?"

Anyway, not only does this extra water screw up a lot of recipes (the meat won't brown right, and roasted chickens end up soggy), it means 15% of the price of grocery store pork and chicken I am actually paying for water! (Mmmm, sizzling, juicy water.) Working this into the equation, the price per pound of actual meat for unadulterated pork and chicken at the natural foods co-op is not as high as it might seem.

Jenni

It's probably very un-consumeristy of us, but we have to admit to not noticing how much water has been injected into our pork or chicken—or even if unsoaked pork is still available at the local grocery store.

We did post a news story from NBC Augusta in which they squeezed a bunch of chicken and then figured out how much your average consumer was paying for "chicken water" each year. Guess how much it was? Did you guess? Ok, fine we'll tell you.

$60 a year. In chicken water. Yuck.

PREVIOUSLY: Are You Paying $60 A Year For Water Pumped Into Chicken?
(Photo:eggrollstan)

]]>
Consumerist-335273 Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:52:37 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=335273&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ JCPenney Emails You To Let You Know You Requested They Not Email You ]]> con_escheremail.jpg If you buy something from the JCPenney website and uncheck the box for receiving email from them, guess what they do? They promptly send you an email in which they point out that you have asked them not to send you an email. And then they ask you to click on a link in the email and participate in a survey. And then, just in case you're not amused/annoyed yet, the comedy team in their marketing department points out that should you want to receive emails from them in the future, you can visit their site and sign up. They have a lot of emails they need to send to you, you see.

from: Registration OptOut < shopper@jcpenneyeservices.com> to: ******@gmail.com, date: Dec 12, 2007 10:36 AM subject: Email Unsubscribe Confirmation mailed-by: jcpenneyeservices.com

While registering as a shopper with jcpenney.com, you chose not to receive our promotional Email. This is being sent to confirm that ******@ gmail.com will not receive Email from jcpenney.com.

The decision to receive Email is personal and can be influenced for a variety of reasons. In an attempt to better understand and respond to our customers, we would appreciate it if you would answer a short survey on this topic.

To participate in the survey, click here.
Your responses, and your email address, will remain private and will help us to continue to build a better shopping experience for you, and a stronger relationship with our customers.

jcpenney.com has always believed in using only permission-based Email marketing. If, in the future, you decide that you would like to begin receiving our promotional Email you can subscribe at jcpenney.com.

Thank you for your participation, and thank you for shopping with us.

(Thanks to Scott!)

]]>
Consumerist-333685 Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:58:38 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=333685&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Depositing Checks In A Bank Of America ATM Is A Huge Pain In The Butt ]]> I thought I'd give your readers a heads-up on how much Bank of America sucks, and why you should make all deposits to a bank teller and never, ever at the ATM.

About 2 months ago, I deposited a nice, fat commission check into my account via the B of A branch ATM. All seemed well, and I noted that the deposit showed up online at my B of A account.
24 hours later, the entire check had been reversed back out of my account, being noted as 'non-negotiable, deposit correction'.

I

went to the bank branch once I realized what happened, and the bank manager told me there was nothing that she could do, was unable to find out why it was kicked out, and that I'd have to wait for the check originals to be mailed back to me. I asked why I couldn't just get a scanned copy from the bank and she said they did not have scanned copies.

I ended up talking to different (new) employee, and he managed to get through to the right department and find out what the heck happened. It showed that the MiCR line was invalid. He magically was able to get a copy of the scanned check (wait... I thought they did not scan copies?) which I presented to the counter clerk, who verified that it was indeed good. I also verified the check with the issuing bank and got a letter showing that the check and MiCR line was good. I showed this to the manager, and she informed me that she still needed the original before she could do anything, and I'd have it in 3-5 business days.

Well, almost a solid month later, (and now FIFTEEN overdraft fees, and multiple desperate trips to the bank, and calls to customer service asking for help) still no originals in the mail. I asked what we'd do if the copy never showed up at all, and she kept putting me off, and was horrible, rude, and curt. I gave up on her, went to another branch armed with all of my information and check copies, and was able to find a nice gentleman who was willing to help. Of course by that time I'd had my company cut me a replacement check and opened a new account at a different bank. The helpful guy did get me a counter credit for the overdraft fees, but they would not reverse them (so it still looks like it was my fault).
I did get the originals back, and surprise! It looked exactly like the original (as copies are meant to do). Nothing was wrong with the check.

I've closed the B of A account after 15 years.
Crazily enough, my fiancé (different last name, no linked accounts, no way for the bank to associate us) deposited two smaller checks into the ATM about 2 weeks ago. (I warned him!) And don't you know, they kicked his out as well. This time, it's because the checks were made out to "Jim Smith" instead of "James Smith". Never mind that Jim has had an account with B of A for 10 years and has deposited numerous checks written out to "Jim Smith" with no trouble.

And guess what? The bank manager (different branch) told him that they do not scan checks that come through the ATM. (LIES!) He had to wait for the originals. His came faster than mine (but not fast enough to alleviate frustration and time wasted going to the bank several times), and he had the overdraft fees that were incurred as a result reversed- but not without resistance. They wanted to give him a counter credit as well. On top of that, when he insisted the overdrafts be reversed instead of credited, the bank manager went back in his account and noted that, 'well, I see you had an overdraft fee here in September, as well...' with the implication that Jim was just trying to get overdraft fees reversed for the hell of it, as opposed to their bank error.

Jim has closed his account as well.
I suppose I could understand their complete lack of assistance if either of us had a history of trying to pass fraudulent checks, or if we were new account holders, but we were both long-term account holders with no previous issues.

Way to go, Bank of America!!

Keep up the good fight, Consumerist gang!

Warmly,
Stacy C

Yuck! Thanks for the letter, Stacy. We hope you're happier at your new bank. Anyone else having problems depositing checks at Bank of America ATMs or are Stacy and her fiancé just unlucky?

(Photo:Bob Reck)

]]>
Consumerist-332211 Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:40:58 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=332211&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ What Goes Into A Foot-Long Toys R Us Receipt? ]]> Giant Toys R Us Receipt, why are these things so !@$% long?Toys R Us rewarded Greg's purchase of a four-pack of Play-Doh with an 18-inch receipt. Greg tried to give the senseless printing an inch of meaning by breaking down the components of his massive receipt:
  • Exciting Sweepstakes Offer: 4.5 inches
  • Essential Purchase Details: 6.5 inches
  • Gift Receipt Section: 7.75 inches
Greg did not purchase the Play-Doh as a gift and did not need a half-foot gift receipt. Huge receipts are not endemic to Toys R Us—Home Depot and Kmart also print to excess—but do they have any use other than as shredder fodder?

Complete Receipt Defeat [An Entirely Other Day]
Image via Aeropause

]]>
Consumerist-331282 Sat, 08 Dec 2007 09:35:30 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=331282&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Marshalls Advertisting Proactiv Over The PA? ]]> Have you ever heard a store advertising stuff they don't sell over the PA? Reader Anne describes some weirdness she encountered at Marshalls:

I just returned from a trip to Marshalls where I was subjected to an ad for Proactiv over the PA system. It was really horrendous and must be addressed! The worst part is that I'm pretty sure they don't even sell Proactiv at Marshalls, so it's not like a blue light special informing us shoppers of a Proactive special in aisle 12.

Has research been done that shows Marshalls shoppers are acne prone? It was total bullshit and during the whole thing I wondered what life will be like when I no longer shop at Marshalls because I refuse to be advertised at when I'm wandering around a store spending money. I'm hoping a good expose will end the advertising and allow me to continue my life of off-price shopping at TJX stores. Please help!

That's odd. Maybe it was the radio? We haven't been in a Marshalls in a while; has anyone else caught them advertising stuff they don't sell?

(Photo:cmorran123)

]]>
Consumerist-329169 Mon, 03 Dec 2007 11:33:40 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=329169&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Buying A "Black Friday" Guitar From Guitar Center's Website Is Extremely Difficult ]]> I have a story to share about an ongoing problem I'm having with Guitar Center's 20% off Black Friday sale. The sale was last Friday morning from 8am-10am. I woke up a little before 7am Friday, and had NO desire to go out at all. So I looked online and realized I could get the sale price on the Gibson SG I wanted (and free shipping) online. Perfect! Below is a brief rundown of what has happened so far (they still have not let me buy the guitar at the sale price):

1) I had to call their 866 number to order the guitar. OK, a little annoying, but I'll deal with it.

2) Their phone lines were completely down within minutes after the sale started at 8am. I just got a generic phone company message, no busy signal or anything. For an hour.

3) I found their live chat, and got in Queue....at number 21

4) After almost 40 minutes I finally was number 1 in line, then got a message that all agents were busy, with a button to click for an email form.

5) I filled out a fairly polite email as my children and wife ran around me getting ready to meet my sister for breakfast.

6) I finished and moved my mouse over to scroll to the submit button........NO SCROLL BAR. Just a word of advice to etailers out there, you MIGHT want to support Macs. It is the 21st Century.

7) After much cursing I managed to copy and paste the web address into Safari where the form did have a scroll bar, but I also forgot I copied the text of my email prior to that, and lost it. So I had to type it all over again, much angrier this time.

8) I hit submit and got a page that said nothing about my message, and had a "create account" button. WTF? So I clicked the button and got a page that offered generic solutions to problems I didn't have, then in small type at the bottom of the page was a line of text asking if I was sure I wanted to submit my email. I did. At 10:05am. My wife and kids were now waiting in the car at this point, and we ended up 20 minutes late for breakfast with my sister.

9) 11:30pm Friday night I got a reply from what sounded like a high school kid with bad grammar, but he said I could call any time and still get the 20% off, b/c "We only had a few reps on the phone and there were hundreds of calls in cue."

10) Sunday night at 5pm after family had left I finally had some time to call and order (again), so I called their 866 number. Another high school aged "dude" told me (after putting me on hold for 5 minutes) that I needed to respond to my email and tell them to create an account for me with a note that I could get the 20% off. I asked if he had any way of doing that. He said no. I offered the "incident number" from my email, but still no go. Ridiculous.

11) I sent a quick but slightly obnoxious response to my email from Friday, and asked for them to create an account for me, blah blah blah. Then I went downstairs to make/eat dinner.

12) 2 hours later I checked my email to find a generic response stating that my response had to be written between 2 very specific lines in the email or they could not process it. WHAT?! I then sent a very nasty response back about how it seems like they are trying very hard to keep me from purchasing the guitar at the sale price. This all happened almost 72 hours ago, and their email form states that a reply will be given to all communication within 24 hours.

13) I just checked back through my communications with them, and found a link to their site that has cataloged the emails I've sent. This is probably the only thing I can say they have done well so far. Yet it says the status of my complaint is "solved." Great, now I get to start from scratch—thanks Guitar Center. I wonder how many other 20% off purchases they successfully stopped this way? I'm going to continue until I get my guitar at the sale price!


Jon

Sounds like they'd rather not sell you a guitar. We'd just as soon not give our money to people who clearly don't want it, but that's just our personal philosophy. We admire your tenacity.

Anyone have any advice for Jon?

(Photo:Random Hero)

]]>
Consumerist-327680 Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:31:42 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=327680&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 10 Annoying Hidden Hotel Fees ]]> Forbes Traveler has compiled a list of the top 10 most annoying hidden hotel fees. We're not exactly jetsetters or anything so a few of them were news to us.

Apparently we're not the only ones who haven't heard of some of these fees, Forbes Traveler says that there have been lawsuits over them:

In Maulding v. Hilton Hotels, Hilton was forced to settle a class-action suit relating to hidden resort fees at 11 of its resort properties. Wyndham Hotels paid $2.3 million to settle with the state of Florida in 2006 after a five-year investigation showed that it had not adequately disclosed hidden fees. Today Wyndham discloses all fees nationwide and requires that online sites that sell rooms on its behalf do the same. Still pending is a lawsuit by James Shulevitz against Arizona's Phoenician resort, where he was forced to pay undisclosed housekeeper and bellman gratuities.

The Top 10 Most Annoying Hidden Hotel Fees:

The Resort Fee
"Why, then, would a resort tack on an additional $10 to $25 resort fee for each day of your stay, even if you never go near the pool or the beach? Because it can."

Telephone Fees
"AT&T would charge our hotel 10 cents per local call. The hotel would then charge the guest between $1.50 and $2. Long distance was even worse. It's a very easy way to add to the bottom line."

The Energy Fee
"In reality, the fee has nothing to do with the amount of energy you actually consume during your stay. It just is what it is."

The Technology Fee
"You'd think by now hotels would be scrambling to offer free high-speed Internet access as a competitive advantage, but that's often not the case."

The Groundskeeping Fee
"Here's hoping you enjoy looking at the rose bushes that line the resort's driveway. They could cost you an additional few bucks in "groundskeeping fees," one of the more absurd fees that some resorts have come up with."

The Towel Fee
Proceed with caution, especially at poolside, where cabana boys will offer you extra towels and then ask for your room number."

The Safe Fee
"One could easily argue that a fee for an in-room safe is fair...if you actually use the safe. What's unfair is charging you $3 a day just for the privilege of sleeping in the same room with a safe even if you never touch it. "

The Housekeeping and Bellman Fees
"Maids and bellmen work hard for the money, and they depend on tips to supplement their income. That's fine, but the tips should be up to you, not up to the hotel, which may assess mandatory gratuities but not tell you until you check out, long after you've already put cash in hands all around the hotel."

The Parking Fee
"Hotels routinely get away with charging $20 or more per night (plus tips) for mandatory valet parking, even if there's a convenient hotel parking lot just steps away."

The Mineral Water Fee
"How nice to see a bottle of Evian or Fiji water on the credenza next your bed, just begging to be the quencher of your traveler's thirst. And how utterly frustrating to be charged a $7 anti-dehydration fee."

The Top 10 Most Annoying Hidden Hotel Fees (Article) [Forbes Traveler]
Top 10 Most Annoying Hidden Hotel Fees (Slideshow) [Forbes Traveler]
(Photo:DCVision2006)

]]>
Consumerist-325027 Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:50:44 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=325027&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Many Shoppers Just Aren't Buying Christmas Stuff In October ]]> con_emptyshoppingcartagains.jpg Apparently a lot of U.S. consumers feel the same way as our readers do about stores putting up Christmas displays before Halloween—that is, they don't like it. A new survey finds that despite early store displays, 40% of shoppers don't plan on starting Christmas shopping until after Thanksgiving, an increase of 10% over the previous year.

One of the survey group's analysts writes, "I spotted the first holiday set-up in a store on August 18th this year - that's nearly a month earlier than last year. Retailers are looking to start the season earlier but consumers just aren't ready." He also blames the low enthusiasm on the lack of any "must-have" products this season, and says that retailers are a victim of their own deep discounting as Christmas nears, which has conditioned shoppers to wait for better deals.

"Christmas in October? No thanks, shoppers say" [CNN Money]

RELATED
"Stores Know You Don't Like Christmas Marketing In October, But Don't Care"
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-310041 Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:50:19 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=310041&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Stores Know You Don't Like Christmas Marketing In October, But Don't Care ]]> A "Christmas Creep" article in the New York Times gathered a bunch of quotes from retailers explaining why they feel the need to start marketing Christmas two holidays in advance. The verdict? They seem to know it irritates you, but they don't really care.

Walmart won't start Holiday marketing until Halloween, but are "not embarrassed at having rollbacks available now for shoppers. We know many like to plan ahead and spread the cost of Christmas," according to their spokesperson.

Toys 'R Us who recently opened a "pop up holiday store" in Manhattan causing us to scream in frustration, said: "It's understated." "Everyone can use a little Christmas right now, after a summer of toy recalls," Ms. Waugh said. "It's time to remember what toys are all about."

L.L. Bean is running an ad with red and green but no explicit Christmas references. They call it, "a little toned down." When asked if L.L. Bean worries about irritating shoppers, their spokesperson confessed: "It's safe to say there is always anxiety," she said. The ad "serves the marketing purpose. It gets people thinking that the holiday is coming."

Does "Christmas Creep" bug you? Take a photo and submit it to our Flickr pool, like vidaarctique did. The best photos will be collected and featured on Consumerist. Be sure to tag your photos "Christmas Creep."


Stealthily, Stores Start Christmas in October
[NYT via CBS News]
(Photo:vidaarctique)

]]>
Consumerist-308752 Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:29:11 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=308752&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Ads In Video Games: Annoying Intrusion, Or Welcome Dose Of Reality? ]]> Ads1.jpgAdvertisers are expected to quintuple the amount spent placing ads in video games over the next five years. Beyond mere brand placement, consoles with an internet connection are capable of displaying dynamic billboards that can advertise The Simpsons Movie today, and The Simpsons Movie Sequel: The Return Of Spider Pig, in two years. From the LA Times:
The player's ability to don, kick, toss or use products is part of the appeal. In "Super Monkey Ball," players try to get their monkey characters to collect Dole-branded bananas. And in "Tony Hawk's Project 8," players use Nokia phones.
After the jump, tell us whether you greet ads in video games with skepticism and disdain, or appreciate them as a dose of reality in an otherwise virtual world.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

For advertisers, they're not just games [LA Times]

]]>
Consumerist-285523 Fri, 03 Aug 2007 09:22:05 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=285523&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How to Read Wired Magazine: Razor Blade Required ]]> User clarkburbidge has written an Instructable that teaches a reader of Wired magazine how to quickly and efficiently remove the annoying "invasive advertising," thus resulting in a more gratifying reading experience. He also suggests that readers contact Wired to express their displeasure at the number of annoying "glued in" or "thick page" ads by emailing the editor to congratulate them for using fewer "bad ads" this month:

Wired!

Your magazine is great. I love it all... all but the invasive advertizing. My monthly ritual of de-magositing my Wired, was utterly painless. The 4 "Subscribe to Wired" cards all but fell out. No extra thick pages, gummed in advert books, or "look at me I'm a 4 page spread in 2 pages" fold outs? Is this a fluke or a new direction. I hope the later!

Willing to pay $40 for less advertizing (and less invasive advertizing)!

Clark

If you would like to send a similar email encouraging the good trend seen in this months Wired do so by emailing rants@wiredmag.com

We used to subscribe to Wired ourselves until we grew tired of these very ads, which are not just in Wired but in tons of magazines. —MEGHANN MARCO

How to Read Wired Magazine [Instructables]

]]>
Consumerist-235030 Thu, 08 Feb 2007 12:09:37 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=235030&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Cingular Launches Pay-Per-Use Push to Talk ]]> Now you can be an annoying, inconsiderate jerk on a pay-per-use basis, rather than by subscribing to Cingular's Push-To-Talk plan. From their press release:

Customers using one of several wireless phones can now use the company's PTT service, as needed, for $.15 per minute. In addition to having access to the largest PTT network coverage area, a customer can receive several enhanced PTT features unavailable on similar services offered by some other carriers including:

* Availability- unique icons allow PTT users to see if other PTT customers
are available before making a PTT call.
* Convert to Cellular - enables a PTT call to be converted to a regular
wireless voice call. Calls with up to 30 participants can be converted
effectively creating a mobile conference call.
* Voice Messaging - allows customers to send a voice message to one person
or a whole group.

Customers with the following phones can immediately begin annoying people:

Blackberry Pearl, LG models CG300 CU400 and F7200, Motorola V365, Samsung models D347, D357 and D407 or Sony- Ericsson Z525a. More devices will be released within the year. —MEGHANN MARCO

AT&T Says 'Hear Me Now!' Introduces Pay-Per-Use Push To Talk Service [Cingular via Gizmodo]

]]>
Consumerist-233235 Thu, 01 Feb 2007 13:29:32 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=233235&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Comcast Does Away With "All Day" Waiting ]]> Comcast has begun narrowing the window of time customers have to wait for technicians, says the Wall Street Journal.

Comcast Corp., the country's largest cable provider by customers, with 24 million, has phased out all-day waiting and narrowed appointment times to two-hour or four-hour windows, depending on technician or customer availability. In some areas, it has also added appointments starting as early 6:30 in the morning. Cox Communications Inc., another leading provider, offers two-hour time frames and has tested waiting windows as small as 45 minutes in its New England market. And Time Warner Inc.'s cable division has been expanding its "call to meet" appointments, whereby the technician calls a customer while he or she is en route to the home so the customer doesn't have to wait around.
It seems that cable companies in general are trying to improve their image with customers. We wish them luck, as their industry is one of the most hated around. —MEGHANN MARCO

Finally, The Cable Guy Is Getting With The Program [WSJ]

]]>
Consumerist-231517 Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:10:20 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=231517&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ TiVo Fast Forward Ads Are Back ]]> A reader was watching his TiVo'd episode of 24 last night when he saw that the fast-forward ads are back.

While not quite as bad as their original design, the fast forward ads are back. I was fast forwarding through the commercials of tonights episode of 24 and I noticed a still image applied over one of the commercials.
We don't have a TiVo and we never have, but we understand that these ads annoy TiVo-ers. True?—MEGHANN MARCO

TiVo's Fast Forward Ads Are Back [My Surmise]

]]>
Consumerist-228748 Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:09:11 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=228748&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ New Annoying TiVo Ads ]]> Do marketers sit around their house looking for things to put ads on? A reader writes in with a tip about TiVo:

When I finished watching this weeks episode of Scrubs, I was prompted by a rather annoying TiVo message. "Are you done with this program?" But this was not the regular TiVo deletion prompt. I am usually given two options, "Delete now" or "Keep this recording", this time I was given a third, "Get your BK Xbox games today!" followed by the Burger King logo.
Um, this is annoying and lame. —MEGHANN MARCO

New Annoying TiVo Ads [My Surmise]

]]>
Consumerist-227731 Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:36:04 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=227731&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Verizon To Put Ads On Your Phone ]]> From The New York Times: "Beginning early next year, Verizon Wireless will allow placement of banner advertisements on news, weather, sports and other Internet sites that users visit and display on their mobile phones, company executives said."

The Times goes on to give some examples of ads that have appeared on mobile phones in the past. "The ads have tended to involve simple banners or text messages, like those connected to the "American Idol" show, in which consumers are urged to send in a vote. Or they have offered digital coupons, like those that allow Dunkin' Donut customers to show a coupon on their phone at the counter to get a 99 cent latte."

Wow, a latte. So what is the future of cell phone advertising? "David Goodrich, director of digital for the West Coast region for OMD, an ad agency, said he did not believe mobile advertising could be particularly effective until marketers could regularly and easily buy space for video clips.

Advertisers "are crazed to get information" onto the phones, Mr. Goodrich said. But the effectiveness "will be really limited until you've enabled site[sic], sound and motion."

Fantastic, we can not properly express the rage we will feel if our cell phone ever plays a video clip that shills Dunkin' Donuts Lattes while we're just trying to check the weather. Sigh. Are we alone on this? —MEGHANN MARCO

Verizon to Allow Ads on Its Mobile Phones [New York Times]

]]>
Consumerist-224819 Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:28:51 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=224819&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Emirates Airlines OKs Cellphones In-flight ]]> Image redacted.

Emirates Airlines will become the first carrier to enable full cellphone use on its flights, starting January. The western world is surely soon to follow.

Finally, definitive proof that using your cellphone on the plane supports terrorism. — BEN POPKEN

International airline to allow cell phone chatter on planes [CNN] (Thanks to CrayonShinobi!)

]]>
Consumerist-223720 Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:44:20 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=223720&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Holiday Travel Tip: Don't Wrap Before You Fly ]]> According to travel blog, InFlighHQ:

The TSA has reported that ALL wrapped gifts are subject to be unwrapped at the security check-in. The TSA recommends bringing wrapping paper with you, or purchasing some upon arrival. Bringing wrapped gifts will not only cause you frustration as they are unwrapped, but also slow down already long lines.

Oh no. Lifehacker also points out that you might want to check that the liquids you are bringing are approved... so you don't lose a tasty dessert.

Don't Wrap Before You Fly [InFlightHQ via Lifehacker]

Related:
Charges Dropped in "Liquid Terror" Plane Plot
Cleveland Airport Confiscates Passenger's 'Dangerous Liquid' Pies

]]>
Consumerist-223331 Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:19:02 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=223331&view=rss&microfeed=true