<![CDATA[Consumerist: Alcohol]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Alcohol]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/alcohol http://consumerist.com/tag/alcohol <![CDATA[ Has The Recession Forced You To Swap Stoli For Swill? ]]> The old adage about booze being recession-proof may have some truth to it: alcohol sales are up 2% over the past year. Not surprisingly, the cheap stuff is leading the way, with sales of private-label wine — no, that's not the stuff you brew in your backyard — up 20%. And more people are shunning bars and restaurants, opting instead for the comfort of a brown paper bag and the neighborhood stoop.

According to Nielsen data quoted by Retailer Daily, 68% of consumers are cutting back on "fine dining" and 59% are spending less time in bars, opting instead for the "trend toward in-home entertaining" (that part about the stoop is what's known in the data biz as "extrapolation"). That's contributed to the closure of almost a thousand bars and clubs over the past year, but has helped to fuel to a boom year for convenience stores, drug stores and mass retailers.

For the 26-week period ended August 22, 2009, domestic wine sales rose 5%, domestic vodka sales rose 8.1%, and domestic beer sales rose 3.2% compared to the same period a year earlier. According to Nielsen, compared to imports the average price of domestic wine is 25% cheaper, the average price of domestic vodka is 50% cheaper and the average price of domestic beer is 35% cheaper. In addition, for the 52-week period ended August 22, 2009, private label wine sales grew more than 20% and private label spirits sales grew more than 10% compared to the same period a year earlier.

So, have you switched from swish to swill? Or have you finally realized that all vodka tastes the same? Share your recession drinking tips in the comments.

Consumers Seek Alcohol Savings [Retailer Daily]

(Photo: Maulleigh)

]]>
Consumerist-5391813 Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:06:14 EDT Marc Perton http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5391813&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Minister For Hire Walks Out On Wedding ]]> Where'd my wedding go?If you're in Ohio and hire Gillian Kresila to officiate your wedding, you'd better not disobey her no-alcohol rule or you'll be sorry. Kresila discovered that the 23-year-old bride, Erin Kuhns, had toasted her magic day with a glass of wine, and she walked out on the wedding a few minutes before it was scheduled to start.

Kuhns said Kresila saw one of her bridesmaids with an alcoholic beverage and asked Kuhns if she had been drinking. Kuhns told her yes, she had a glass of wine to toast the wedding, and Kresila told her she was told not to drink before the wedding and would not perform the ceremony because of it.

Kuhns said that while Kresila never told them not to drink, the rehearsal coordinator who works with Kresila mentioned at the rehearsal dinner the day before the wedding not to drink alcohol and also to drink plenty of water and eat, so no one would get got sick. They didn't meet the reverend until the day of the wedding.

Kresila, who works for a company that provides non-denominational ministers for events, told the press that it's against the law in Ohio to marry people under the influence, so to keep things simple she has a zero-tolerance policy. Which is sort of understandable if the law really said that, but it doesn't:

Ohio law only refers to not providing a marriage license to someone under the influence.

The couple found a replacement minister through a relative and got married anyway, drunk or not, and although Kresila hasn't refunded their $50 deposit, they haven't paid her the rest of the $100 fee either. They also say they aren't planning on suing her, which surely is a first for a wedding screw-up.

"Bride and groom say their pastor ditched them at the beach" [Chronicle-Telegram] (Thanks to David!)
(Photo: bastique)

]]>
Consumerist-5327323 Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:25:51 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5327323&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ A new study says 1 in 25 deaths is somehow ... ]]> A new study says 1 in 25 deaths is somehow tied to alcohol consumption. The impact was compared to that of smoking, the article quotes experts who want to take drastic action such as "increasing the price of alcohol, reducing its availability and banning advertising." That seemed a little draconian to us, until we realized that it would free us from the tyranny of that Bud Lite "drinkability" campaign. [BBC]

]]>
Consumerist-5302944 Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:36:06 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5302944&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Advice: If the Walmart employees tell you ... ]]> Advice: If the Walmart employees tell you that you can't drink alcohol while waiting to have your car serviced, don't respond by ripping a telephone out of the wall. [Hernando Today via Fark]

]]>
Consumerist-5292517 Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:38:19 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5292517&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pennsylvania Training Its State Liquor Store Employees To Be Nicer ]]> If you buy your devil juice from Pennsylvania, you might notice a difference in the way you're treated starting later this month. Pennsylvania is spending $173,000 to train employees of its state-owned liquor and wine stores to be more polite, reports PhillyBurbs.com: "The board wants to make sure clerks are saying 'hello,' 'thank you' and 'come again' to customers coming in for wine and liquor."

The chairman of the state liquor board defends the decision, pointing out, "the reality is that, in stores around the country, customer service is inconsistent and uneven." We won't argue with that. We do think, however, you could solve any rudeness problem faster by setting out a cheap bottle of vodka next to each register along with a sign that says, "If our Associate doesn't greet you with a smile, take a free shot!"

"Pa. liquor board tries to improve worker manners" [PhillyBurbs.com via 9-to-Fried]
(Photo: swearinglibrarian)

]]>
Consumerist-5167538 Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:25:16 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5167538&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Alcohol Sales Plummet ]]> What's up, beer drinkers of America? Bloomberg notes that "take-out sales of alcoholic beverages tumbled 9.3 percent in the fourth quarter, the steepest drop since the U.S. Commerce Department started compiling data half a century ago," and a drop four times greater than the overall fall in consumer spending. Most of that was due to the 14 percent drop in beer sales.

The website fivethirtyeight.com posted this chart last week, and although the scale sort of dramatizes the extent of the drop, it's still clear that in the past 40 years alcohol sales have never fallen more than 4%.



Fivethirtyeight suspects it's a type of conspicuous nonconsumption:
a manifestation of Calvinist guilt over both the present failures of the economy and its prior excesses. A deliberate effort to deny oneself pleasure.

We wouldn't know, because we're still buying beer like it's 2006.

"U.S. Consumers Driven Away From Drink Spending: Chart of Day " [Bloomberg]
"Beer No Longer Recession-Proof"
(Photo: a4gpa; chart: fivethirtyeight.com)

]]>
Consumerist-5159860 Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:16:59 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5159860&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Three Cheap Recipes For DIY Windshield De-Icers ]]> Throwing vinegar or alcohol on your frozen windshield might be more efficient than hacking away with an ice scraper and cursing the snow, according to Wisebread. Inside, three easy do-it-yourself de-icing recipes that are sure to make those frigid mornings a little more bearable.

  • Prevention!
    Sure, you could pay for a commercial deicer, but why bother if you have a spray bottle and vinegar?
    • Fill the bottle with three parts vinegar and one part water and go spritz the car before bed.
    Removal!
    Oh, the spritz didn't work? Ok, um, then try these two recipes:
    • "Mix one part water to two parts rubbing alcohol. Apply to the window and watch it peel right off!"
    • "Use a bottle of 70% isopropyl alcohol (50% works, too, but not as well) with a few drops of dish soap. Apply liberally to the glass with a spray bottle. (Readers also recommend adding alcohol to the washer fluid container, with a 50/50 mix, to keep wiper lines from freezing up in the winter.)"
    What other timesaving strategies do you use to keep your car ice-free during the winter? Warm up the comments with your wisdom.

    3 Cheap and Easy Formulas for Homemade Windshield De-Icer (Plus Bonus Tips) [Wisebread]

    ]]> Consumerist-5133618 Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:25:11 EST Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5133618&view=rss&microfeed=true <![CDATA[ That Burning From Mouthwash? It's Cancer ]]> Great news, kids! Australian researcher Michael McCullough says you should stop using alcoholic mouthwashes like Listerine and Scope because they could give you oral cancer.

    [Alcohol] increases the permeability of the mucosa to other carcinogens like nicotine," explains Professor McCullough. "But also the first breakdown product of alcohol with enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase is acetaldehyde. And acetaldehyde is a known human carcinogen."

    [...]

    He says there is enough evidence to suggest dentists should not be recommending long-term use, and earlier this evening the New Zealand Ministry of Health advised that it is not sensible to use alcohol-containing mouthwash long-term without advice from a dentist.

    Smokers are still far more likely than mouthwash users to get oral cancer—fifty times more likely, according to some studies, so you shouldn't rush over to the oncologist's office at the first pangs of a new canker sore.

    Dentists also say that you don't really need mouthwash if you brush and floss regularly and eat a healthy diet. Which, um, we all do, right?

    Research shows some mouthwashes may cause cancer [3 News] (Thanks to Shaula!)
    Mouthwash linked with increased cancer risk [ABC]
    The role of alcohol in oral carcinogenesis with particular reference to alcohol-containing mouthwashes [Australia Dental Journal Abstract]

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5128529 Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:10:00 EST Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5128529&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Money-Conscious Boozers Fight Depression With Happy Hour ]]> Consumers low in spirits are starting to sadden bar owners as they increasingly take advantage of happy hour deals. People aren't cutting back on their drinking, but they are consuming more at home and trying to extract more booze from their buck when they go out.

    "We don't see a change in what people are drinking as much as seeing a change in the time they are drinking," said Kip Snider, beverage director for the Yard House chain of restaurants.

    Still, a growing reliance on happy hour — as well as a "reverse" happy hour with the same specials from 10 p.m. to midnight Sundays to Wednesdays — is not a bad strategy.

    "In times like this, the bar business should take on more of a focal point for restaurants because of the incremental profit that comes with each sale," Henkes said.

    Restaurants net about 15 cents for every dollar of food purchased but 38 cents for alcohol, Henkes said. So it makes sense for casual dining spots, in particular, to pitch booze.

    Alcohol is usually recession-proof—sales usually increase when times are tough because wandering around aimlessly taking swigs of bottled water is neither helpful nor chic.

    Have you changed your drinking patterns to save cash? Share your depression drinking strategies in the comments.

    Bars and restaurants are getting toasted by happy hour [Los Angeles Times]
    (Photo: MarkAndMarina)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5128343 Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:00:35 EST Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5128343&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ News Flash: "Shoe Bomb" Jokes Are Not Appropriate Airplane Banter ]]> Ah yes, alcohol and planes mix together once again — resulting in three days of jail for one St. Louis man who thinks "shoe bombs" are funny.

    He was flying to Maryland to get married and had apparently had a few beverages before boarding his flight. When a flight attendant asked him to close his laptop — he asked her, "Are you the one who checks for shoe bombs?" This was a mistake.

    Within minutes, federal agents removed him from the plane. He spent much of his time in the St. Louis County jail in solitary confinement.

    When he was reunited with the regular prisoners he claims to have received a standing ovation. He's been charged with making a false bomb report and still intends to get married in Maryland.

    Shoe Bomb Joke on Plane Lands Missouri Groom-to-Be in Jail [Fox News]
    (Photo: Jeremy Brooks )

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5125496 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:48:04 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5125496&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Hey! You Can Buy Alcohol At Costco And Sam's Club Without A Membership! ]]> Need some quality alcohol at discount prices? Don't want to sign up for a Costco, Sam's Club or BJ's membership? There may be hope for you!

    SmartMoney did a little investigation and what they uncovered is downright magical — old state blue laws allow citizens of certain states to buy alcohol from "membership only" wholesale clubs — without a membership.

    Here are the details:

    Costco: Membership is not required for purchases of alcohol in the following states: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Texas and Vermont.

    BJ's Wholesale Club: Membership is not required for purchases of alcohol in the following states: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Texas and Vermont.

    Sam's Club: No membership required!

    SmartMoney says that you shouldn't expect employees to actually know about this policy — so print their article and take it with you. Speak to a manager, and you'll be pouring drinks in no time. Keep in mind that not all locations carry alcohol, so make sure you go to one that does. Also, don't try to sneak other items through with your purchase— these laws apply to alcohol only.

    UPDATE: Reader Tracy says she checked with the Vermont Department of Liquor Control and they claim that there is no such law in Vermont — so the SmartMoney article may be incorrect. However, the article claims to cite each store's individual policy, not necessarily the laws, so who knows. The article also says that the government officials they contacted had no idea that the laws even existed, and there's a quote from BJ's spokesperson confirming that the policy is real.

    According to our Chief of Education, Licensing and Enforcement, Bill Goggins, there is no such law in Vermont. Liquor laws are very different from state to state; so, it very well could be that there are laws against requiring a membership to purchase alcohol in other states, but it appears that Vermont is not one of them.

    Thank you,

    Marcia
    Marketing/Customer Service Supervisor
    Vermont Department of Liquor Control

    The Cheapest Way to Buy Booze [SmartMoney]
    (Photo: greenwenvy08 )

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5123466 Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:50:48 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5123466&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ It's Midnight Somewhere... ]]> It's New Year's Eve, and we have some drinking suggestions for you.

    We'll start by saying that if you live in any of these cities (plus New Orleans), you probably don't need our advice.

    As for us, we'll be celebrating with on old friend while we still can...


    Cheers to you; be safe and have a happy new year!
    (Photo: Getty)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5121867 Wed, 31 Dec 2008 19:24:39 EST Alex Chasick http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5121867&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ A Farewell To Sparks And Other Alcoholic Energy Drinks ]]> Last week, MillerCoors bowed to pressure from numerous state attorneys general and agreed to decaffeinate its caffeinated alcoholic beverage, Sparks.

    MillerCoors joins Anheuser-Busch/InBev, which pulled its alcoholic energy drinks Tilt and Budweiser Extra (also known as B to the E) in June. While some might criticize the taste of Sparks or label it as alcohol for immature people, there are others who are infatuated by oversize cans of corn syrup and herbal supplements. It is to those that we offer this link from the questionably ironic Hipster Runoff: Dear Sparks, Miss U. We'll pour one out for you.

    MillerCoors Drops Caffeine from Sparks Drinks [WSJ]
    Dear Sparks, Miss U: A Eulogy by Hipster Runoff

    (Photo: cambelina)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5118831 Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:30:00 EST Alex Chasick http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5118831&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Terrifying Website Tells You How Many Calories You Drank Last Night ]]> If you'd like to feel bad, we have a link for you. The BBC's "Alcohol Experiment" shows you the amount of calories you consumed while drinking last night — or any night — and then translates them into (British) food.

    For example, if you had two big old glasses of beer, you drank 355 calories and apparently could have had something called a "jaffa cake." We're not sure what a "jaffa cake" is, but it looks fattening.

    Use this website at your own risk.

    Alcohol Experiment [BBC]

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5104209 Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:39:37 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5104209&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Today is apparently National Bloody Mary ... ]]> Today is apparently National Bloody Mary Day, otherwise known as the day Consumerist is not responsible for its many typos. [BuzzFeed]

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5100426 Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:20:33 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5100426&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ United Airlines Duct Taped Unruly Passenger To Her Seat ]]> A United Airlines crew was apparently forced to use duct tape to restrain an unruly passenger after the normal ankle cuffs kept slipping off. The passenger, who was apparently quite intoxicated after having several drinks at the airport (she also brought alcohol onto the plane), is accused of slapping a flight attendant on the behind, and grabbing and pulling the hair of a passenger whom she'd fallen on.

    Castillo, 45, struck a flight attendant on the buttocks with the back of her hand during Saturday's flight, FBI Special Agent Peter Carricato said in a criminal complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Charlotte. She also stood and fell onto the head of a blind passenger and later started pulling the person's hair, the complaint stated.

    Ankle cuffs kept slipping off Castillo, so the flight crew and two passengers were forced to use duct tape to keep her in her seat, the complaint states.

    She calmed as the pilot diverted the flight to Charlotte-Douglass International Airport, but became disruptive again when authorities boarded the plane to remove her, authorities said.

    Watch how much you drink at the airport, people.

    FBI: Airline passenger restrained with duct tape [AP]
    (Photo: Getty)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5078504 Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:23:30 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5078504&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ United Airlines Pilot Is Too Drunk To Fly ]]> This whole "drunks on a plane" thing is getting out of control. First it was the passengers, then the flight attendants... now it's the pilots.

    The AP says:

    United Airlines says 1 of its pilots has been arrested by police for being over the legal alcohol limit.

    The airline says the first officer was due to join the crew of flight 955 from London's Heathrow Airport to San Francisco when he was arrested early Sunday morning. London's Metropolitan Police say the 44-year-old was arrested following a breath test but has since been bailed.

    Fox News has some quotes from horrified passengers who witnessed the pilot being marched off the plane:

    “A couple of police officers stormed on to the plane as we were all sitting down and went straight for the cockpit.

    “We didn’t have a clue what was happening and we were kept waiting on the plane for hours.

    “It is horrifying to think we were apparently so close to being flown thousands of miles by somebody who could have been drinking."

    United Airlines issued a statement about the incident:

    "United Airlines' alcohol policy is among the strictest in the industry and we have absolutely no tolerance for abuse or violation of this well-established policy.

    "Safety is our number one priority and the pilot has been removed from service while we are co-operating with the authorities and conducting a full investigation.

    Sigh.

    Pilot arrested after failing breath test [Reuters]
    'Drunk' United Airlines Pilot Arrested Before Takeoff [Fox News]
    Pilot arrested in UK for being over alcohol limit [WHBF]
    Pilot Arrested at Heathrow Following Breath Test[WSJ Middle Seat Blog]
    (Photo: Zonaphoto )

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5067121 Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:22:23 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5067121&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ POLL: Does The Current Drinking Age Limit Actually <em>Encourage</em> Binge Drinking? ]]> A new campaign arguing that the 21-year-old drinking age is not working, and that it "has created a culture of dangerous binge drinking" on college campuses has been signed by an eclectic group of over 100 college presidents, including those of Duke, Dartmouth, The Ohio State University, and Johns Hopkins.

    From the Wall Street Journal:

    John McCardell, a history professor and former president of Middlebury College in Vermont, is leading the effort. His group, Choose Responsibility, a nonprofit unaffiliated with the college, has received financial backing from money manger Julian Robertson. Mr. McCardell says he receives no money from the alcohol industry.

    He argues current laws drive drinking underground, causing more problems than they solve. "The law is out of step with reality," he says. "The law is so obviously unjust and discriminatory. It ought to at least be the subject of debate."

    But he and the college presidents are taking on powerful constituencies, including some of their colleagues, the top government traffic-safety agency, the insurance industry and public-health authorities, all of which say the higher drinking age saves lives. Even representatives of the alcohol industry say they support current laws.

    A college student interviewed for the piece says she cut back on her drinking once it was no longer forbidden:

    Elizabeth Pogust, a 21-year-old senior at Middlebury, says she felt pressured to drink as a freshman. Classmates would quaff alcohol in their rooms before roaming the campus on weekends, she recalls. As they got older, she says, she and her peers learned their lessons. "I've noticed a definite change in my attitude once it was no longer forbidden," she says.

    What do you think? Is the 21-year-old drinking age part of the problem — or the solution?



    Bid to Reconsider Drinking Age Taps Unlikely Supporters
    [WSJ]
    List of College Presidents Who Signed The Petition [Amethyst Initiative]

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5039874 Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:59:30 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5039874&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ America's 15 Hardest Drinking Cities ]]> Ah, Consumer Behavior. Forbes took a look at the CDC's 2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey (BRFSS) and ranked 33 cities based on their resident's answers to three survey questions:

    whether they had at least one drink of alcohol within the past 30 days; whether men had more than two drinks per day or women one drink per day; and whether they had five or more drinks on one occasion. In each case, higher-ranking cities reported larger percentages of their population answering in the affirmative.

    Of course, as Forbes notes, a better "hard drinkin'" rank doesn't mean your city is a "den of debauchery," and "just downing a few cold ones doesn't make a person irresponsible." Well, like, duh...

    Forbes' 15 Hardest Drinking Cities

    • 1. Austin, TX
    • 2. Milwaukee, WI
    • 3. San Francisco, CA
    • 4. Providence, R.I.
    • 5. Chicago, IL
    • 8. (tie) Seattle, WA, Cleveland, OH, St. Louis, MO
    • 9. Boston, MA
    • 10. Cincinnati, OH
    • 11. Pittsburgh,PA
    • 12. Virginia Beach, VA
    • 13. Portland, OR
    • 14. Jacksonville, FL
    • 15. Detroit, MI

    America's Hard-Drinking Cities [Forbes]
    (Photo: Paxton Holley )

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5035396 Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:04:48 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5035396&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Why Does Target Need ALL Of Your Driver's License Data To Sell You Wine? ]]> Thruhike98 tried to buy some wine at Target a couple of weekends ago, and they were surprised at how invasive the ID check turned out to be:

    My wife showed the cashier her license, which was behind a clear window in her wallet. He said, “No, please hand it to me.” We both assumed he just wanted a closer look. Once he had it, he immediately picked up a barcode scanner and scanned the back of her drivers license. I asked him what that was all about, as I had never seen anyone do that before. Almost bragging that Target now knows, for example, exactly where we live, he explained that the scan “gets all the information off of the license.”

    Thruhike98 wants to know why Target needs all of this data, and so do we. As he points out in his blog post, it's possible that by scanning the card they're creating verifiable evidence that they performed the required ID check—but in the meantime, the customer has just inadvertently given up all of his license data to a faceless corporation. (One that won't even respond to Thruhike98's email asking them about the practice.)

    We'd like to know whether Target retains all of the data they scan off the license, and if so, why?

    "Target Must Record My Organ Donor Status to Sell Me Wine?" [Thruhike98]
    (Illustration: Getty)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5025376 Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:24:21 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025376&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Woman Punches JetBlue Flight Attendant In The Face For Not Letting Her Smoke ]]> Once again we remind you not to drink too much at the airport before getting on your flight. We know airports are boring and sad and they make you want to kill the pain with copious amounts of gin. Don't do it — or you could end up punching a JetBlue flight attendant in the face.

    Meet Christina Elizabeth Szele of Woodside, NY. She was charged with assault and interference with flight attendants after she caused such a disturbance that her flight was diverted to Colorado. According to an FBI agent who witness the event, Szele yelled "obscenities and racial epithets" when a flight attendant tried to keep her from smoking, prompting the flight attendants to restrain her in plastic cuffs... Szele then broke through the cuffs, and commenced punching.

    Szele had been drinking and doesn't remember any of it, says the AP.

    Woman accused of punching JetBlue flight attendant [Examiner]
    (Photo: So Cal Metro )

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5017934 Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:18:30 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5017934&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ The World's 5 Worst Ways To Get Drunk ]]> We had a sense that some readers may have been put off by The Most Expensive Spirits In The World. We realize now that there are many people who are only willing to spend a few pennies to get drunk, even if it means massive organ damage or death. For those people, Cracked has assembled a list of The World's 5 Worst Ways To Get Drunk. The list, inside...

    5. Tharra
    This spirit native to India boasts a 90% alcohol content and is made by fermenting the mash of sugar cane pulp in ceramic containers. One unfortunate characteristic of the stuff is if you let it sit long enough it turns toxic. Tharra kills hundreds of people per year.

    4. Russian Aftershave
    Many poor Russians have turned to "surrogate" alcohol, which is basically any product with a high alcohol content. Russian aftershaves are a popular item since some have a 97% alcohol content.

    3. Thunderbird
    It is a "fortified wine" and typically contains 17.5% alcohol. Thunderbird was introduced by Ernest and Julio Gallo Winery after the end of prohibition. It was marketed to low income drinkers in America. Their radio ads featured these lyrics: "What's the word / Thunderbird / How's it sold? / Good and cold / What's the jive? / Bird's alive / What's the price? / Thirty twice." Despite its yellow color, Thunderbird turns your lips and tongue black when consumed in large quantities.

    2. Pruno
    Pruno is a famous jailhouse drink which is typically made from different available fruits, sugar, ketchup and bread for its yeast. Basically the ingredients are put into a Ziploc bag, heated occasionally, strained and served. It is legendary for its foul taste.

    1. Changaa
    Changaa is an illegal drink which is popular in Kenya. It is a libation made from distilled grains such as maize and sorghum. Changaa is usually controlled by the criminal gangs who often spike batches with jet fuel, battery acid or formalin. Obviously, this stuff kills many people every year.

    Nectar of the Broke: The World's 5 Worst Ways To Get Drunk [Cracked]

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5014637 Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:00:56 EDT Jay Slatkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5014637&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Vodka Is Pretty Much The Same No Matter What Brand You Buy ]]> In what may have been the most awesome blind taste test ever, a BusinessWeek writer served his friends chilled shots of various brands of vodka to see whether there was any noticeable difference in taste. His argument was that vodka is a neutral spirit and by definition is nearly indistinguishable from one brand to the next—and that consequently the "brand story" (including country of origin) is really all that separates a Grey Goose drinker from a Ketel One alkie. To test this, he asked his subjects to pick their favorite brands from shots and mixed drinks.

    It turns out, no one could really tell one vodka from the other—there was one successful pick, but it wasn't repeatable. (Probably because the subjects were all half-drunk by that point.)

    The other conclusion I drew was that when it comes to mixing vodka with fruit juice, or unpurified ice, you might as well as save your money and keep a bottle of Popov around. After mixing with fruit juice, muddled mint, simple syrup, or tap-water ice, the slight subtleties of the vodka in these concoctions go out the window faster than the promise of a contractor who says he'll come to your house every day to work until the job is done.

    Oddly, there's a related slideshow of various vodka brands with "tasting notes" that seem to imply that every vodka is a unique and beautiful creation. Hmm, looks like we'll have to try our own blind taste test.

    "World's Best Vodka? It's Anybody's Guess" [BusinessWeek]
    "The Best Vodkas" (slideshow) [BusinessWeek]
    (Photo: Getty)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5010727 Fri, 23 May 2008 12:15:51 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5010727&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Beer T-shirts For Teenage Girls Bad For America? ]]> The Center for Science in the Public Interest has its knickers in a twist over Forever 21 selling "beer shirts," because the clothing retailer is "popular with teenage girls."

    “Adolescent and teenage girls hardly need further inducements to drink,” wrote George A. Hacker, director of the alcohol policies project at CSPI. “Heavy drinking imposes special risks for girls, due to their lower body weights and different metabolisms and the contributing role of alcohol in sexual assaults, date rape, and unwanted and unplanned pregnancies.”

    The devilish ts in question featured the logos of various beers such as Miller, Guinness and Foster's, as well as catchy slogans like “beer is my anti-drug,” and “save water, drink beer.” Forever 21 has responded by quietly yanking the shirts from its website.

    We don't think the CPSI should be so hard on Forever 21. After all "21" is in the name and they do have this handy outdated food pyramid shirt. I mean, what more could they ask?

    Brewers Urged to Stop Marketing Beer Shirts to Young Girls [CSPI]

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5007857 Mon, 05 May 2008 13:39:37 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5007857&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Pennsylvania, a land ruled by the draconian ... ]]> Pennsylvania, a land ruled by the draconian "Liquor Control Board," may allow wine vending machines with “fingerprints and biometric readings” for age verification to be placed in grocery stores so that people can finally buy wine at the supermarket. What the hell is wrong with Pennsylvania?[Dr. Vino ]

    ]]>
    Consumerist-5007552 Thu, 01 May 2008 18:34:32 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5007552&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Drunk Dell Tech Repairs Laptop With Hammer ]]> A boozy Dell tech tried to repair the headphone jack on Andrea's Inspiron 9100 with a hammer. Andrea's sense of propriety kept her quiet when Joel arrived reeking of booze and cigarettes, and neither she nor her boyfriend spoke up when he started wielding a hammer to install parts that wouldn't fit onto the motherboard. Joel ended up cracking the case and putting nail holes through the wrist pad. When he left, Andrea called Dell to complain and asked for a new tech. Who did Dell dispatch? Joel!

    Andrea eventually shipped the laptop to Dell so they could repair Joel's damage. Sadly, they forgot to repair her headphone jack.

    Andrea writes:

    I was just reading the story about the pubic hair laptop, and I have my own story about Dell!

    Since I bought my Dell Inspiron 9100 in fall 2004, it has had so many problems, making my extended accident insurance totally worthwhile! My charger died after about a year, they replaced it after 3 hours on the phone, and that one died shortly after, which was also replaced. I reformatted the summer after college, and my Wifi quit working. I spent hours on the phone with a multitude of different techs and the last one realized the cd they'd sent me wasn't for a different wireless card. But the worst thing to go wrong was my computer's fans. Being an overzealous first-time computer buyer, I didn't realize what a GIANT this laptop is. After just a few minutes on, it heats up fiery-hot and kicks on the jet-engine fans. And after a few months, the headphone jack attached to one of the scorching fans stopped working.

    So I called Dell. Over, and over, and over. Keep in mind this was in 2005. Every tech had their own idea what to do, and many of them spoke almost no English, so it usually took at least 2 hours just to explain what was wrong. Don't get me wrong, they were courteous and they wanted to help, but they just couldn't understand me. Finally, in fall 2006, someone decided to do something about it. They offered to send someone out to replace my motherboard, or ship it off to Dell somewhere. I couldn't afford to not have my computer for a week, so I opted for the Dell technician. Oh jeez was I stupid.

    The next day, a gentleman named Joel called to schedule my appointment. He arrived at the scheduled time and went to work. I was alarmed by the overwhelming scent of ALCOHOL and cigarettes on him, but too polite to say anything, I let him do it. Except, he forgot his tools in the truck. He returned 5 minutes later reeking more strongly, but ready to fix my computer. I watched him take out all the parts, gently. My IT boyfriend came over around then, and we sat watching videos and watching Joel. After removing my motherboard, he started replacing parts. Except, they didn't fit. What to do?? GET OUT A HAMMER AND HAMMER IT BACK IN!!?? Oh yes, he did. With my LCD monitor attached.

    When completed, there were a few problems. The frame around my monitor was cracked through, and there were 2 nail holes coming up through the wrist rest area and frame of the keyboard. I pointed them out to Joel [the destroyer] and he said 'Yeah, I thought that was weird when I got here'. He asked if it was working now and I said yes(like I was going to say no and have him touch my poor laptop again!) When I lift up my laptop, there was a neat little pile of the bits of plastic he had broken off.

    I called Dell right after this and the tech I got was pretty indifferent. After 3 hours, they said they'd send out a different Dell Service Technician to fix the problem. Guess who called? You're right, JOEL! I didn't answer his call. So I called Dell again, and said no, not Joel. I had to explain the damage to this technician too, which despite showing them pictures still took 3 more hours, they put in another service order. It was Joel, AGAIN! This time, he showed up AT MY HOUSE, WITHOUT AN APPOINTMENT. He called me 5 times that day, each time leaving angrier and angrier messages about where am I? The only reason I didn't call the cops was because I had just moved and this creepy freaking guy outside my house all day didn't know that I no longer lived there. He had been calling me on his cell phone, so I had no idea what company he worked for or what I was supposed to do. I asked Dell. They told me if I wanted someone else, I would have to call the company. So I did. I complained about him and demanded another technician. And they said he is the only Tech in the area, so it's him or nothing. So I decided maybe losing my laptop for a week wouldn't be the worst thing ever. I am still pissed that his company felt too good to give me an apology. If you live in Madison, WI, beware of JOEL!!

    Dell shipped it out and back in 4 days to replace the cracked frame, nailed wrist rest and keyboard frame, and motherboard. Keep in mind the WHOLE POINT was to fix my HEADPHONE JACK. Everything came back all pretty except the jack was STILL BROKEN. AND the computer overheats and shuts down now! I called Dell, again. They stayed on the line with me for hours AGAIN. And FINALLY I got someone who knew something about my laptop!!! Dana shipped me a replacement fan, which was also a replacement headphone jack, and TADA! After 2 years, my headphone jack worked! Now, if my warranty hadn't expired, I could get my computer to stop trying to start on fire, and then shut down! It is completely worthless if I want to use it for longer than 5 minutes.

    I attached 3 of the most obvious photos of what was damaged when he hammered my computer. The first is of the cracked LCD frame, the 2nd the weird dent from hammering a screw into the wrist rest, and the 3rd the completely drilled through keyboard frame. And in Dell's defense, my boyfriend got me a Latitude C640 from 2002 they were throwing out at his work and it's wonderful. It is portable, reasonably fast, and doesn't overheat, even after 6 years of use.

    It is amazing how good it feels to vent that to someone who could benefit from my experience! Thanks for this opportunity, Consumerist!

    http://consumerist.com/assets/resources/2008/04/Cracked%20Screen-thumb.jpg
    ]]>
    Consumerist-379087 Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:25:39 EDT Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=379087&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Attorneys General Investigating Anheuser-Busch And Miller Over Energy Drink Marketing ]]> Attorneys general in several states have subpoenaed documents from A-B and Miller as part of an investigation in to the marketing of caffeinated alcoholic energy drinks, says the AP.

    A-B issued a statement:

    "Anheuser-Busch is, of course, cooperating with the subpoenas," the company said. "But it is important to realize that the AGs are investigating products whose formulation and labeling already have been approved by the federal authorities, as well as by those states that require state liquor authority approval."
    Critics of the drinks say they are marketed to teenagers who already are familiar with and consume energy drinks, but Miller denied this accusation in a statement:
    "We responsibly market our products to legal drinking age consumers consistent with industry marketing codes and applicable laws and regulations," the Milwaukee-based company, a unit of SABMiller PLC, said.
    A-B continued:
    "If the Attorneys General truly believe that, despite the state and federal regulatory approvals, alcohol and caffeine should not be mixed, then they should use their powers to persuade these authorities to regulate or ban all such beverages, not just the lower-alcohol, prepackaged ones," the statement said.

    We didn't get the impression that the AGs thought people shouldn't mix caffeine and alcohol, just that maybe the drinks shouldn't be marketed to kids (if indeed they actually are.)

    The first time someone handed us a "Sparks" or whatever, we seriously thought it was soda from ALDI or something.

    States probe marketing of energy drinks [BusinessWeek]
    (Photo:Mister Brentus)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-358984 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:34:30 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358984&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Man Chugs Entire Bottle Of Vodka Rather Than Turn It Over To Airport Security ]]> Here's a bad idea:

    A 64-year-old man was trying to get past airport security with a liter bottle of vodka, and, rather than surrender the bottle or pay an extra fee to check his carry-on baggage—he chugged the entire thing.

    He was soon unable to stand or walk, and had to be taken to a nearby hospital to be treated for alcohol poisoning.

    Man chugs liter of vodka in airport security line [MSNBC] (Thanks, Douglas!)
    (Photo:Brittany G)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-333207 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:09:35 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=333207&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ US Airways Denied New Mexico Liquor License ]]> Sorry alcoholics, US Airways is now banned from serving alcohol on all flights to and from New Mexico. The state Regulation and Licensing Department had already denied the airline a temporary liquor license in June after US Airways served alcohol to a passenger who later crashed his car, killing a family of five. The Licensing Department yesterday rejected the airline's permanent application, claiming that it:

    ...cannot reasonably find that approval of application will protect the public health and safety or that it is in the public interest.

    According to The Arizona Republic, this is "the first time the agency has taken such an action." US Airways earned New Mexico's ire twice before for boozing up passengers who were later cited for drunk driving. The state had issued the airline a citation, and even reached out to discuss a settlement. US Airways never responded.

    "That citation is still open, it's never been dealt with," [Bob Hagan, a spokesman for the department] said.

    Those two incidents and a third in which state employees witnessed US Airways flight attendants serving alcohol to a visibly intoxicated man while on board a flight from Phoenix to San Diego on Nov. 6, weighed heavily on the state's decision to deny the permit, Hagan said.

    "That obviously is not a violation of New Mexico law because they weren't in New Mexico air space, but we took that as an indication US Airways is a questionable candidate for a New Mexico liquor license," Hagan said.

    No liquor permit for US Airways in N.M. [AP]
    PREVIOUSLY: US Airways Denied New Mexico Liquor License For Not Paying Outstanding Fine
    (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez) ]]>
    Consumerist-324027 Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:11:59 EST Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=324027&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Why Can You Brew Your Own Beer, But Not Moonshine? ]]> con_manloveshismoonshine.jpg Slate investigates, and the short answer is, because the government stands to lose too much money on lost sales of spirits, which are taxed far higher than beer: the U.S. "takes an excise tax of $2.14 for each 750-milliliter bottle of 80-proof spirits, compared with 21 cents for a bottle of wine (of 14 percent alcohol or less) and 5 cents for a can of beer."

    The article provides a lot of other useful information for the DIY liquor-store-enthusiast. For instance, it was illegal under federal law to brew your own beer or wine until 1978, but now a household with two adults can brew up to 200 gallons each of wine and beer, unless you live in a state that says you can't. Also, moonshine drinkers tend to have lots of lead poisoning, which is why 'round these parts we call it "Chinese Import Tea."

    "Why Is Moonshine Against the Law?" [Slate]

    RELATED
    Laws for Homebrewing [Beertown]
    (Photo: Getty)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-313730 Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:28:30 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=313730&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Why Stores Have To ID Everyone ]]> con_mysteryshopperbuyingwin.jpg Our earlier post about carding senior citizens was all well and good, but here's what life's like from the other side of the register, according to Behind the Counter: "Nearly everyone who works a register and is faced with the prospect of selling tobacco and alcohol ought to be very, very afraid. Why? Because the federal government is watching you and will deliberately try to bust your Wal-Mart khaki-clad behind!"

    Enforcement is strict, and the consequences are severe. Says the author of the blog:

    A friend of mine who worked at a convenience store actually had that happen to him because he wasn't paying attention on a holiday weekend and sold a pack of Marlboro Lights to a kid that looked 25 but was really 16. The episode cost him his job and almost $4,000 in attorney fees and fines. They don't play.

    Every single time anyone who does not look old enough to have fought at Normandy tries to buy tobacco or alcohol from me I feel an icy stab of fear grip my chest. "Is this the one? Are there agents watching? Is this a sting?" We've had the ID traps run at our store. Cashiers have been fired and arrested.

    Read the full post, which includes details of Customer Service "Mystery Shoppers," who swoop in like Dementors to suck the—well, not joy exactly, but whatever it is you're supposed to be feeling when you're at work—from your skull.

    (We still think it's foolishness to card a 74-year-old man.)

    "Why are some retail places retentive about proving your age?" [Behind the Counter — and our first title for this post was, "Retail Double Agent Reveals Big Brother Conspiracy Behind ID Checks!"]
    (Photo: Getty)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-304210 Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:52:42 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=304210&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Liquor Store Refuses To Sell Booze To Man Who May Be 12 or 74, Who Can Say? ]]> con_partywiththeoldpeople.jpg A shop in England refused to sell two bottles of wine to a white-haired, balding grandfather—you know, the kind with wrinkles on his face—because he balked when the cashier asked him to prove he was over 21. The man, being ornery in that way that old folks just naturally embrace, refused: "I felt like saying 'What do I look like? Are you a fool?'"

    What particularly upset him was that the store manager refused to intervene—instead, he took the wine away. "He picks up the wine and, in the manner of a child taking home his ball, says 'Well, we won't serve you'. ...I applaud any efforts to stop kids being served and standing on street corners getting drunk. But this was just totally stupid."

    A spokesperson for the liquor store offered a "them's the rules" explanation which sounds like it was pulled from the script for "Idiocracy" (emphasis is ours):

    We take our responsibility with regard to selling alcohol very seriously and all our stores operate the Task 21 scheme, which addresses the difficulties our staff face in being able to determine if a customer is legally old enough to buy alcohol. To further limit any element of doubt staff at the West Kirby store are required to ask anyone buying alcohol to confirm that they are over 21.
    That spokesperson totally has a point. We've seen enough Scooby Doos to know how well a good rubber mask can fool even veteran mystery solvers. In fact, maybe from now on, store clerks should be required to try to pull your mask off your face if you don't show ID. And what about children with progeria? If you didn't have this policy, they could totally get away with some hooch. Criminals are everywhere.

    Look, we sympathize with the man, and we're not mocking the cashier either, who probably agrees that it's overkill but isn't in a position to argue. But blind bureaucracy like this makes the whole human race look stupid. We suspect the store manager is much closer to 21 than the grandfather or the cashier.

    "Man, 72, refused alcohol over age" [BBC News via Behind the Counter, because we couldn't resist]
    (Photo: Getty)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-304206 Thu, 27 Sep 2007 06:29:10 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=304206&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ 10 Great Wines For $10 Or Less ]]> con_mandrinkingwinesideways.jpg The sommeliers who read The Consumerist may scoff, but there are actually some decent wines available for $10 or less, or so says the New York Times food critics. They tasted 25 popular low-price wines and picked the ten they thought were decent:
    The wines we recommend are gulpable and satisfying with a modest level of intrigue. You cannot expect much complexity at this level, or subtlety. But you can hope for something more than the most basic, and you can strive to avoid wines that are obviously confected or manipulated to achieve a predetermined set of characteristics.

    Here are the wines they recommend, listed in order beginning with their highest rated. Read the full article for tasting notes, ratings, and commentary.

    1. Casa Cadaval Portugal Ribatejano , $8.99, Padre Pedro 2002
    2. Domaine de l'Ameillaud France , $9, Vin de Pays de Vaucluse 2005
    3. Viña Gormaz Spain Ribera del Duero , $9, Tempranillo 2005
    4. Georges Duboeuf France , $9, Beaujolais-Villages 2006
    5. Altas Cumbres Argentina Mendoza , $9, Cabernet Sauvignon 2005
    6. Wyatt California Cabernet Sauvignon 2005 , $10
    7. J. Vidal-Fleury France , $10, Côtes-du-Ventoux 2005
    8. Domaine Monte de Luz , $7, Uruguay Tannat 2006
    9. Ravenswood California Vintner's Blend , $10, Merlot 2004
    10. Paringa , $9, South Australia Cabernet Sauvignon 2005
    11. "Happiness for $10 or Less" [New York Times]
      (Photo: Getty)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-302843 Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:53:21 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=302843&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Should Alcoholic Beverages Have Nutrition Labels? ]]> lies.jpgOur alcoholic uncle always swore that booze was healthy, and if the Treasury Department has its way, nutrition labels on alcoholic beverages may soon have people thinking he was right. A rule issued last week by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau would require all alcoholic beverages to sport a panel listing traditional information like serving size and alcohol content, along with data on calorie, carbohydrate, fat, and protein content. The alcoholic beverage industry vigorously supports the rule, but some advocacy organizations are concerned that the nutrition labels might imply that alcoholic beverages have some nutritional value. Tell us what you think of the proposed rule in our poll, after the jump.




    Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

    Nutrition Labels Proposed for Alcohol [NYT]
    27 CFR Parts 4, 5, 7, and 24 [Notice No. 73; Ref: Notice No. 41] Labeling and Advertising of Wines, Distilled Spirits and Malt Beverages; Proposed Rule (PDF) [Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau]
    (Photo: Irish Typepad)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-286174 Sun, 05 Aug 2007 19:17:21 EDT Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=286174&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Teens Prefer Liquor To Beer, Hate Wine ]]> Future%20leaders%20of%20america.jpgThe CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report claims that teens prefer bourbon, rum, scotch, whiskey, and vodka to beer. Why should you care? Regulators and policy makers use the statistics to develop beverage-specific measures to combat underage drinking, "including increasing alcohol excise taxes and increasing restrictions on the distribution and sale of alcoholic beverages." The CDC studied high schoolers in Nebraska, Arkansas, New Mexico, and Wyoming, and found the following:

    In all four states, liquor was the most prevalent type of alcoholic beverage usually consumed among students who reported current alcohol use, ranging from 34.1% in Nebraska to 44.7% in Arkansas. The second most prevalent type of alcohol usually consumed was either beer or malt beverages (beer in Nebraska, malt beverages in Arkansas, and beer and malt beverages nearly equally in New Mexico and Wyoming). Wine was the least prevalent type of alcohol usually consumed in all four states, ranging from 1.6% in Arkansas and Wyoming to 3.1% in New Mexico.
    The CDC has two common-sense explanations for liquor's popularity: it gets teens drunk faster, and it can be mixed with "other beverages such as soft drinks."

    The Center for Science in the Public Interest disagrees with the CDC's conclusions and believes liquor's popularity can be chalked up to clever marketing:

    Think of the dull amber, brown, and clear bottles in liquor stores of yesterday and compare that to the bright pinks, neon blues, and girly greens that characterize hard liquor today. Today's infantilized liquors are flavored with peach, raspberry, mango, cherry, grape and every other kid-friendly flavor under the sun: Hypnotiq. Smirnoff Blueberry. DeKuyper Pineapple Coconut, Sour Apple, or Tropical Mango schnapps. Pink Grapefruit flavored Hiram Walker? Please.
    Which argument regulators accept will make the difference between higher sin taxes or tightened restrictions on advertising. What do you think? Are teens after efficiency or pretty colors?

    Types of Alcoholic Beverages Usually Consumed by Students in 9th—12th Grades —- Four States, 2005 [CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report via the CSPI]
    (Photo: jenerally speaking)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-283561 Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:05:47 EDT Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=283561&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Personal blood-alcohol meters are pieces ... ]]> Personal blood-alcohol meters are pieces of crap, giving wildly inaccurately results.

    ]]>
    Consumerist-275421 Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:22:02 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=275421&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Man Arrested For Driving After Drinking On A US Airways Flight ]]> We need to figure out how to make airports more entertaining. After drinking at Phoenix International Airport and again on his US Airways flight, Ernest Wright, 49, of Albuquerque, got in his car and drove away. He was arrested with a blood alcohol level of .16 and charged with aggravated DWI. (We suppose he told himself, "If it's good enough for CEO Doug "Dear Jerry, I'm Taking Your Airline" Parker, it's good enough for me!")

    So you're asking yourself, why is this news? Back in November, another drunk passenger from a US Airways flight drove after being over served on that airline and killed 5 members of a Las Vegas family when he "drove the wrong way on Interstate 25." It was later found that US Airways did not have a valid liquor license.

    The airline has since applied for a temporary license and are serving alcohol while they wait for approval in New Mexico.

    Remember to watch how much you have to drink when traveling. It's long. It's boring. There's no food. Don't get to a place where you can't drive yourself home. The report said the driver in question had been served two small bottles of whiskey on top of whatever he'd had at the airport. If you're going to drive home, perhaps that's a bit too much. —MEGHANN MARCO

    Police: Drunken driver served on flight [The New Mexican]
    (Photo: JohnKit)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-262506 Tue, 22 May 2007 12:13:38 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=262506&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Spykes Gets Axed ]]> Kid%20Aint%20Gonna%20Like%20This%20One.jpgAnheuser-Busch is pouring Spykes down the drain less than a week after twenty-nine state attorneys general asked the brewer to warn customers that mixing Spykes with caffeinated beverages could be dangerous. The AGs also expressed concern that the colorful alcoholic flavor shots encouraged underage drinking.
    "Due to its limited volume potential and unfounded criticism, we have ceased production of Spykes," Anheuser-Busch said in a statement, in which it added that Spykes was the lowest alcohol content product in its market segment.
    The decision, announced by Anheuser-Busch CEO August Busch IV, was heralded by Connecticut AG Richard Blumenthal as a "significant victory in the fight against underage drinking." Sorry, kids. — CAREY GREENBERG-BERGER

    Anheuser-Busch says will stop selling Spykes [Reuters]
    PREVIOUSLY: Twenty Nine Attorneys General Worry Teenagers May Get All Coked-Up On Spykes
    (Photo: cyancey)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-261838 Sat, 19 May 2007 09:26:20 EDT Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=261838&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Twenty Nine Attorneys General Worry Teenagers May Get All Coked-Up On Spykes ]]> Twenty-nine state attorneys general have asked Anheuser-Busch, makers of the alcoholic flavor shots called Spykes, to warn consumers that it may be dangerous to mix Spykes with caffeinated beverages. The AGs also expressed concern that Spykes might encourage underage drinking with its "tiny, attractive, brightly colored containers that can be easily concealed in a pocket or purse." That couldn't possibly appeal to underage drinkers, who, we are told, prefer their 40 oz beverages concealed in sober tan paper bags.

    Anheuser-Busch spokeswoman Francine Katz said the St. Louis company does not endorse underage drinking and does not target minors. She said Spykes shots, which are sold in 2-ounce bottles and have as much alcohol as a third of a glass of wine, are less likely to appeal to minors, who typically "drink for instant impact."
    Controversy is practically Spykes' mistress. The Department of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms already ruled that the Spykes' teeny-tiny government mandated warning label was "out of compliance" for being too teeny and tiny. We don't see Spykes becoming less controversial anytime soon, leading us to wonder: is Spykes the new Cocaine? — CAREY GREENBERG-BERGER

    Anheuser Criticized Over Alcohol-Caffeine Drinks [Washington Post]

    ]]>
    Consumerist-259996 Sat, 12 May 2007 18:56:33 EDT Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=259996&view=rss&microfeed=true
    <![CDATA[ Beer Money In Congress ]]> Beer manufacturers are lobbying congress in order to secure a "beer tax rollback" which would "cut the federal beer tax in half to its 1951 level," according to the CSPI. Alcohol producers donated around $10 million to federal candidates in the last election cycle, and 70% of that was "beer money."

    To be perfectly frank, we don't have a real strong opinion on the pros or cons of beer tax, but we thought you'd like to know about it just in case you'd like to form one for yourself. For more info, you can check out the running beer money tally at the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Since, you know, people in Congress are technically supposed to be representing you and not beer.—MEGHANN MARCO

    Beer Money In Congress [CSPI]
    (Photo: tubes.)

    ]]>
    Consumerist-259800 Fri, 11 May 2007 15:26:01 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=259800&view=rss&microfeed=true