<![CDATA[Consumerist: Airlines]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Airlines]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/airlines http://consumerist.com/tag/airlines <![CDATA[ Airlines Could Start Charging Extra For Credit Cards ]]> Could extra fees for using a credit card to pay become the airline industry's hot new trend?

Some airlines are adding on credit card transaction fees at the time of ticket purchase that far exceed their actual cost, and are only disclosed at the very last stage of the purchase process. Spirit charges $4.90 for the favor of running your plastic, and Allegiant charges $14. With American Airline's laser eye on the bottom line and US Airways trying to do everything Spirit does, might this become the latest fee fad for the struggling airline industry? Christopher Elliot thinks so.

(Thanks to Rebecca!) (Photo: Cranky Media Guy)

]]>
Consumerist-5395086 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:07:49 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5395086&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Mother And Child Kicked Off Southwest Flight Receive Apology, Free Travel ]]> Earlier this week, a 2-year-old boy drowned out preflight announcements on a Southwest Airlines flight with his screams of "I want Daddy!" and "Go, plane, go!" So the airline kicked the child and his mother off the plane.

Southwest has since apologized to the child's mother, and offered a refund and travel voucher.

Southwest apologizes to mom on Calif. flight [AP]

(Photo: woodleywonderworks)

]]>
Consumerist-5394482 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:00:05 EST Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5394482&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ United Loses $12,418.28 Of Famous Rock Climber Steph Davis's Gear ]]> Pro rock climber and base jumper Steph Davis is always superstitious about her last "flight." On any trip, the last jump off the cliff in her wing suit, she's sure something will go wrong. Recently, her fears came true, but not while hurtling herself off the Eiger. It was her flight on United, who lost $12,418.28 of her gear, including parachute.

After many phonecalls, United informed Steph via email that they will pay $3,174.20 of the claim. They will let Steph know in 60 days whether they are going to continue looking for her gear or not.

"I was a hell of a lot safer tossing myself off a cliff in a nylon squirrel suit. It's awfully hard to base jump with no parachutes though. Thanks United! You're the best!" wrote Steph on her blog.

Here's a video of Steph climbing and jumping off the 400-foot Castleton Tower, in Moab, Utah.

Guitars, the luggage of people with broken guitars, rock-climbing equipment... United seems to have a problem safely delivering valuable baggage, or owning up to its mistakes.

So, next time, if you're flying with a lot of expensive gear, make sure to have it insured, or send it FedEx.

United Loses BASE Gear [High Places] (Thanks to Mark!)

]]>
Consumerist-5393507 Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:07:07 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5393507&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ United Airlines Loses "United Breaks Guitars" Singer's Luggage ]]> Dave Carroll, the musician who recently wrote a catchy new jingle for United Airlines, told the New York Times that on a flight with United this past Sunday they lost his bag. What's worse, United employees wouldn't let him leave the baggage area for more than an hour because they said the bag was just delayed. United told the paper, "We will fully investigate what regretfully happened."

"With Video, a Traveler Fights Back" [New York Times] (Thanks to Alan and Ray!)
(Photo: Doug Letterman)

]]>
Consumerist-5392842 Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:31:59 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5392842&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways Shrinks ]]> US Airways has announced it plans to lay off a thousand employees, about 3% of its workforce, and will cut flights and focus mostly on four hubs: Charlotte, Philadelphia, Phoenix, and Washington, DC.

The airline isn't cutting all flights to other cities. For example, the hourly NYC-Boston-DC shuttle service will remain unaffected. From the Wall Street Journal:

US Airways, the result of a 2005 merger of American West Airlines and the former US Airways, said it would reduce the number of flights to Las Vegas to 36 from 64 daily departures as a result of increasing fuel prices and weak demand. It also said it would end flights at Colorado Springs, Colo., and Wichita, Kan.

Other changes announced Wednesday include the suspension of five European routes: to London Gatwick; Birmingham, England; Milan, Italy; Shannon, Ireland; and Stockholm, Sweden, from US Airways' international gateway in Philadelphia. It will also give up its right to fly between Philadelphia and Beijing.

The layoffs should happen "during the first half of 2010."

"US Airways to Cut 1,000 Jobs, Focus On Hub Cities" [Wall Street Journal]
(Photo: claudiogennari)

]]>
Consumerist-5392093 Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:37:08 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5392093&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 4 Questions That Will Fix The Travel Industry ]]> When will we see an airline passenger bill of rights? Why aren't there 5-star and 2-star airlines? How do you deal with hotels filling review sites with fake testimonials? These questions came up in a conversation about the travel industry I had the other night. Here's some possible answers:

When will we see an airline passenger bill of rights?

ANSWER: When there's a fatality. When someone dies because they were stuck on the tarmac for hours and couldn't get their insulin, we will get an airline passenger bill of rights.

Why aren't there 5-star airlines and 2-star airlines? Might some customers pay more for slightly better service, instead of universally bad service?

ANSWER: Unknown.

Consumers increasingly rely on online user reviews to make their decisions before booking hotels. Businesses, especially small ones, have figured this out and started stuffing review sites with fake testimonials. Is the solution to use better tools to start ranking user and provide more transparency to their account activity, so that, for instance, you can see whether this person made any other reviews or always leaves hyperbolic praise?

ANSWER: Those tools are great, but better than building a better mousetrap, more consumers need to learn it's not enough to just not rely on any one review, but that you can't just rely on any one review site.

What about people who don't have time to do the extra research?

ANSWER: It needn't be that time-consuming. Just by adding the word "complaints" to your Google search can reveal all you need to know to make an informed decision.

(Photo: "Oliver 62")

]]>
Consumerist-5390799 Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:12:58 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5390799&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ You Accidentally Forget You Don't Live In Baltimore, And AirTran Fixes It ]]> Here's a heartwarming email from reader Joy. She accidentally booked tickets from Baltimore instead of Philly and AirTran not only fixed this mistake — they didn't charge her extra.

Joy says:

This weekend, I had plans to fly from Philadelphia to Fort Lauderdale. When I got to the airport, I had trouble checking in. I went to the ticket counter for help and it was there that I discovered I had accidentally booked the tickets from Baltimore, NOT Philadelphia. I was horrified and shocked; visions of hundreds of dollars danced in my head. I explained my apparent stupidity to the attendant and asked how I could get to Fort Lauderdale. After some intense clacking of keyboard keys, she told me if I ran, I could make a flight that connected through Atlanta.

I ran.

When I got to Fort Lauderdale, I stopped by the ticket counter to arrange the return trip on Wednesday. I explained what happened and that I needed to return to Philadelphia, not Baltimore as reserved. Apparently surprised by the ineptness of some travelers, the attendant had me explain a few times. Once she understood, she clacked her keys for a while and told me she thought she could help but needed to call her supervisor. After a little while, she waved me over to her station and told me she could return to me to Philadelphia for $500. I gulped and as I figured out how I would cough up the extra funds, she asked me to wait a moment. With a bit more clacking of keys, she told me there would be no charge.

I have no idea why these two ticket counter attendants took it upon themselves to help me out of such a stupid mistake, but I really appreciate their assistance. The situation was entirely and completely my fault, yet they fixed it for me. Frankly, I was shocked; in an age when airlines charge for everything from extra pretzels to water bottles, I was completely floored that my ticket was corrected at no charge. But more than that, I'm grateful. I haven't flown Airtran very many times but if this is any indication of the level of service provided, Airtran is becoming my preferred airline.

Everyone who has heard this story has been equally amazed by the service. Traveling via air has become so miserable that to receive extra service and a little bit of mercy makes all the difference in the world.

The best part of this story is that they were nice not once but twice. This means that AirTran has at least two different people working for them that are kind to others.

(Photo:Flying Photog)

]]>
Consumerist-5390082 Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:45:59 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5390082&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Expect Airlines To Keep Hiking Ticket Prices As Holidays Approach ]]> This year it's a seller's market when it comes to buying airline tickets, reports the New York Times, so if you must travel via plane, buy early and try to be as flexible as possible.

Rick Seaney, chief executive of FareCompare.com, wrote in his online Holiday Travel Guide, "Holiday travel procrastinators do so at their own peril this year, and practical travelers should be shopping now and buying before the end ofOctober."

The problem (for consumers) is that since airlines have cut back on the number of flights this year, they have fewer unsold seats to fill—and that means no more last minute fare drops to top off the plane.

"Essentially, that's creating a sellers' market," said Jeff Pecor, a spokesman for Yapta.com, which alerts fliers to price drops even after the ticket has been bought so travelers can call the airline to claim a travel credit.

"While we're tracking roughly the same number of flights for this holiday season as last year, we have issued fewer price drop alerts on flights," he added.

"In Shift From '08, Holiday Airfare Is Soaring Daily" [New York Times]
(Photo: kynbit)

]]>
Consumerist-5380138 Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:51:42 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5380138&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ TSA Takes Baby Away From Mother? ]]> UPDATE: The TSA has posted their CCTV video of the incident from 9 different angles. In the video, the child is never picked up by TSA agents or removed from the mother's sight.

UPDATE 2: Nic responds to the video by saying, "in the video, it looks as though my son is playing happily in his stroller while i am being searched with a wand. obviously this is the big discrepancy with my story, since he was not in my sight at that time, and one that i too am thoroughly looking into. neither of the two phone calls i placed while seated in security are in the video either. what is shown in the video is incomplete as it leaves out when the security agent took my son to a separate area and out of my sight. this matter is one that is being handled between my family and the TSA."

Mommyblogger Nic tells the horrifying story of how TSA agents took away her child because the clip on his pacifier set off the metal detector yesterday.

Nic writes:

Jackson was in my arms, and in the midst of getting all of our gear on the conveyor belt, my mistake was neglecting to take off my son's pacifier clip that hangs from his shirt, which is metal.

The instant I walked through the metal detector with Jackson in my arms, we beeped. I knew exactly why...

...The male TSA agent repeated, "I'm going to have to pick him up to inspect him."

I handed him my son.

I handed him my son and he walked away with my child.

My eyes welled up with tears, I stood up from my chair and I asked the female TSA agent, "Where is he going? Where is he taking my child? Why is he leaving?"

Jackson, while being whisked away looked at the male TSA agent awkwardly and repeated "no no no no."

I started crying.

The TSA eventually returned the child a few minutes later but the interim period was extremely stressful for the mother. According to the TSA website, "We will not ask you to do anything that will separate you from your child or children."

Looks like some agents need retraining.

TSA Agents Took My Son [My Bottle's Up] (Thanks to David!)

]]>
Consumerist-5383378 Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:08:55 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5383378&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ DOT To Airlines: Sorry, But People Like To Change Their Underwear ]]> The United States Department of Transportation has finally warned airlines: Most people don't like to go for more than 24 hours without brushing their teeth and changing their underwear.

This seems rather intuitive to us. But as airline bottom lines have worsened, even before the recession, airlines began limiting when and under what circumstances they would reimburse travelers for basic items such as clothing and toiletries purchased while waiting around for lost luggage to show up.

[M]any carriers have in recent months reimbursed passengers only for necessities that were purchased more than 24 hours after arrival on the premise that the bag could be located and delivered within that time. What's more, carriers are limiting the payback only on the outbound leg of the trip.

That would mean a passenger whose bag was lost on a flight from Chicago to New York would have to wait a full day from landing before purchasing mouthwash and a suit for the "big meeting" that next day - if a refund was expected.

"Travelers should not have to pay for toiletries or other necessities while they wait for baggage misplaced by airlines," U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said.

While we sympathize with airlines' need to keep costs down, the 24-hour rule is unreasonable, and we're glad to hear that the DOT has put its collective foot down.

DOT warns airlines: Pay up fast for lost bags (via CT Watchdog)

(Photo: sfxeric)

]]>
Consumerist-5381074 Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:45:13 EDT Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5381074&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Founder Of FlyersRights Says Delta Hacked Her Email Account ]]> Kate Hanni, the founder of the passenger advocacy group FlyersRights.org, has filed a lawsuit against Delta Airlines in which she claims they hacked her email account and acquired personal email messages sent between her, some journalists, and a guy who was at the time working for Metron, a company hired by the FAA to investigate Delta.

From the Houston Chronicle:

It started a couple of months ago with a laptop that inexplicably crashed.

Then, someone altered the password on Kate Hanni's desktop computer and when she finally got into it, the files were corrupted.

Microsoft's tech support said she'd been hacked. A few weeks later, all her e-mail disappeared, and AOL told her the same thing.

According to the Airline Biz blog at the Dallas Morning News, this September 29th statement by Frederick J. Foreman, a former employee of Metron forms the core of Hanni's claims:

"On Friday, September 25, 2009 at approximately 10:00 AM, I was escorted by two (2) Metron Aviation, Inc. employees into the office of Mr. James Gaughan, Senior Vice-President and General Manager.

Mr. Gaughan asked me to go over the chronology of my interaction with the media. I told him my interaction with the media as I remembered it. He told me that what I told him was not consistent with information that he had. I responded by asking what are you talking about? He immediately said that I had contact with Ms. Kate Hanni on Thursday, September 24, 2009. I said yes I did but Kate Hanni is not the media so that my statements about the chronology of events are correct.

Mr. Gaughan proceeded to show me on his computer monitor what appeared to be hacked and stolen email communications within the last six (6) months or more between Kate Hanni and me, me and Gary Stoller of USA Today, me and Susan Stellin, a freelance reporter, and Kate Hanni and a number of people concerning the Passenger Bill of Rights, excessive surface delays, and other private communications.

It was clear that they had email transactions from both of my private email accounts: Hotmail (eckmaster12 [at] msn.com) and Yahoo (eckmaster [at] mmi-gov.com). It was also clear that these emails were from Kate Hanni's private and personal email account (katcrew4 [at] aol.com), as well as from Gary Stoller's (gstoller [at] usatoday.com) private USA Today account, and Susan Stellin's (stellin [at] earthlink.net) private and personal email account.

There were no emails communications from Metron Aviation's email system only communications from information that I gave her as fuel for getting the Passenger Bill of Rights passed in Congress.

He said that Delta Airlines sent this information to them. I took this to mean that Delta Airlines and Metron Aviation both had a copy of these hacked and stolen email communications. Mr. Gaughan said that Delta was mad and upset that one of Metron Aviation's employees had provided Kate Hanni with this kind of information. He said that I had put Metron Aviation in a precarious situation with Delta Airlines and that at a minimum I had not been a good employee by doing this. I tried to explain to him that what I sent to Kate Hanni on 9-25-2009 could be obtained by anyone by simply analyzing the public information that is available online and provided by the Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation and Statistics, but to no avail.

Based on these hacked and stolen email communications, James Gaughan of Metron Aviation, Inc. decided to terminate my employment. The two (2) Metron Aviation escorts took me to my desk where I got my personal belongings and then they escorted me out of the building at approximately 12:15 PM."

Delta says the accusation is "clearly without merit," and Metron says the accusation is "completely baseless and without merit." Hanni is seeking $11 million in damages from Delta.

"Has Delta been hacking?" [Houston Chronicle]
"Consumer activist Kate Hanni accuses Delta of hacking her email, computer" [Airline Biz]
(Photo: Hong Kong dear Edward)

]]>
Consumerist-5381875 Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:05:34 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5381875&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Your Plane Is Probably On Time, Thanks To The Recession ]]> The good news, according to a recent report by the Brookings Institution? For the last few years, air travel delays have decreased and travel has become almost bearable. The bad news? That's because of the decrease in travel due to the recession, and economic recovery will mean more delays. Yay.

What's the real source of the problem? Airlines' hub-and-spoke system, which means that delays at the country's busiest airports delay as many, many passengers and reverberate throughout the system.

The 26 metropolitan hubs and other large metropolitan areas host a concentration of national delays-and the situation is worsening over time. The concentration within the 100 largest metropolitan areas was especially troubling with congestion-related delays as well as those lasting over two hours. Within the 26 domestic hubs, six experienced worse-than-average delays for both arrivals and departures: New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Miami, Atlanta, and San Francisco.

The report contains more in-depth analysis by region and even by airport, for far more information than the average consumer probably needs.

Expect Delays: An Analysis of Air Travel Trends in the United States [Brookings Institution]

(Photo: mrkathika)

]]>
Consumerist-5378961 Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:00:39 EDT Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5378961&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ More Airlines Add $10 Travel Surcharge To More Holidays ]]> Since consumers didn't whine too much about the addition of $10 "just because" fees airlines imposed on busy travel days, they've added fees on more days. Goody for us!

Companies participating in this exciting new program include Delta, US Airways, American, Northwest, Continental, United, and AirTran. According to WalletPop, here's the expanded list, including exciting new holidays such as Easter, Memorial Day, and apparently Spring Break.

  • Nov. 29
  • Nov. 30
  • Dec. 19
  • Dec. 26
  • Dec. 27
  • Jan. 2, 2010
  • Jan. 3
  • March 14
  • March 20
  • March 21
  • April 11
  • May 28

If you've already booked your tickets, the fee won't be added after the fact. But watch out when making holiday travel plans.

Happy holidays: Airlines expand $10 fee, and it's your fault [WalletPop]
Airlines' Holiday Surcharge Extends to Memorial Day [Bnet]

PREVIOUSLY: Airlines Add $10 Surcharge On Busy Holidays

(Photo: elderleaf) (Thanks, William!)

]]>
Consumerist-5376311 Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:00:52 EDT Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5376311&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Airline Urges Passengers To Leave Their Urine Behind ]]> In a new and exciting airline cutback effort, an airline is now asking passengers to relieve themselves before getting on the plane in order to decrease passenger weight and save fuel. No, we're not making this up. And no, it's not Ryanair.

Japan's All-Nippon Airways is embarking on this experiment for the month of October. Airline staff will ask passengers to relieve themselves shortly before boarding.

ANA hopes the weight saved will lead to a five-tonne reduction in carbon emissions over the course of 30 days.

Although it is intended as an experiment lasting one month and 42 flights, the trial may be extended if it is well-received by passengers and if results are positive.

Based on an average human bladder capacity of 15oz, if 150 passengers relieved themselves on board an aircraft, this would amount to 63.7kg [140 lbs] of waste.

Interesting idea, but what kind of insane person gets on a plane with a full bladder in the first place?

Airline asks passengers to use the toilet before boarding... so they will weigh less and help cut carbon emissions [Daily Mail]

(Photo: mr_t_77)

]]>
Consumerist-5376474 Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:55:52 EDT Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5376474&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ United Lets You Pre-Pay Your Baggage Fees ]]> United has just announced a program where you can pay $250 to have their normal checked baggage fees waived for a year. The plan covers 2 bags per passenger, up to 8 passengers "traveling under the same confirmation number." Current fees are $20 for the first bag and $30 for the second, so if you travel solo a lot and always carry two bags you'll have to make six trips before you enjoy any savings. On the other hand, if you've got a big family trip planned in the next year, this may be a way to shave a little off the fee gouging. But only if you're stuck with United; BestFares.com notes that "SouthWest offers 2 free bags for free and JetBlue offers the 1st bag free."

"Premier Baggage" [United via Best Fares]

]]>
Consumerist-5375218 Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:31:21 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5375218&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ JetBlue Is An Excellent Airline ]]> Having taken JetBlue for the first time last week, I must say I throughly enjoy their services. First, I got a round-trip non-stop flight to Seattle for only $279.20, tax included. Awesome.

Consumerist is a very critical site so when I see something extra from a company I feel like should give credit where credit is due.

On the day of my flight, I missed the boarding cutoff at JFK but ticket agent Orniston called down to the gate to see if they would let me in. They wouldn't, and the next available flight was about a ~$500 fare difference. With patience and humor, my man Orniston checked with his supervisor and got me on it for only a $40 fee. Score!

The bathrooms at Terminal 5 seemed a lot cleaner and brighter than the usual. There was free no-BS wifi and a plug-in table - no hunting for spare outlets and crouching like a laptop hermit required.

The Captain gave a good pre-flight announcement that was actually friendly and funny instead of just trying to be. I swear the flight attendant did a sort of sashay dance down the aisle as she checked to make sure everyone's belts were tightened.

Flight was smooth, seats were spacious and I enjoyed 36 channels of real cable, especially the soccer channels. We landed 45 minutes early. On the return flight there was a lot less legroom and my TV kept cutting out. Otherwise, good to go.

A++++, would fly again!

(Photo: Seamus Murray)

]]>
Consumerist-5374749 Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:17:10 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5374749&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Should Airplane Passengers Be Allowed To Make VoIP Calls? ]]> Until now, airplane cabins have been blessedly free from idle phone chatter thanks to FAA regulations. Now, thanks to the introduction of wi-fi on commercial flights, it's time to ask: should passengers be able to use Skype, Google Voice, or another VoIP service of their choice to make phone calls in the air?

Our gut reaction is "OH SWEET MERCIFUL MONEYCAT NO," but not everyone agrees.

Americans are split about in-flight mobile phones, a survey by the Department of Transportation's Bureau of Transportation Statistics found. About 45% said cellphones should be banned on aircraft. About 40% said they should definitely or probably be allowed if they don't pose a safety threat, according to the survey, which queried about 1,000 households.

A chief concern is the in-cabin noise level. Some fear that people may carry on long conversations on their cellphones. And people generally talk louder on cellphones because they can't hear their own voices - unlike on landlines, which have a device that amplifies your voice and replays it through your earpiece.

For now, providers of in-air wireless Internet are blocking voice services, and passengers are finding ways around those blocks just as quickly. (One Consumerist reader reported that his in-air connection simply wasn't fast enough to make a call—to airline customer service, naturally—via Skype.)

Should airlines let passengers make calls via Wi-Fi? [USA Today]

(Photo: Attempts at Photography)

]]>
Consumerist-5371190 Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:25:01 EDT Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5371190&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ United: Bad Toilet Timing Leads To Delay, Arrests ]]> Two passengers were arrested on a United flight from LA to New York after one of them jumped up and ran to the bathroom after being instructed to remain seated by a flight attendant. Apparently the man just needed to use the bathroom — like now.

The AP says that "nothing was found on the plane or in the baggage of the man and his companion," according to LA police.

The flight was about to take off when the man jumped up and ran to the bathroom. The crew found this behavior suspicious and returned the plane to the gate where the man and another passenger were removed, questioned and searched. No charges are expected to be filed.

When ya gotta go, ya gotta go.

No threat found on delayed United flight at LAX [AP]
(Photo:afagen)

]]>
Consumerist-5369687 Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:47:31 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5369687&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Airline Employees Call Police On Angry CEO Who Chewed Them Out ]]> This story combines two immutable laws of nature in a surprising twist: that executives don't always know what their front-line employees are doing, and that airline employees don't give a f*ck who you are and will call the police if you annoy them.

The incident happened at Manchester Airport in England this weekend, when the CEO of budget airline Jet2.com showed up unannounced and saw a 60-minute wait to check in, and a line of about 200 passengers. He gave his employees a good cussin' for "sitting there doing nothing." In response, the employees called the police for breaking the airport's "no threatening the employees" rule.

Apparently the employees' counterattack didn't work:

A police spokesperson said Mr Meeson admitted he had been "unprofessional and irate" but had calmed down so no action had been taken against him.

Meeson also noted that he plans to address whatever training issue prevented the employees at Manchester from doing their jobs properly. We have a feeling there's going to be some turnover there.

"Police called as airline boss berates own staff" [Telegraph] (Thanks to Robert!)

]]>
Consumerist-5369512 Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:34:23 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5369512&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Airlines Add $10 Surcharge On Busy Holidays ]]> If you're planning any air travel on the busiest post-holiday travel days this year, prepare to pay $10 in an extra, uh, "fuel surcharge" on Delta, American, and United flights. Fuel is super extra expensive on November 29th, January 2rd, and January 3rd, you know.

What's the real reason? People returning home after various winter holidays.

The Sunday after Thanksgiving — Nov. 29 this year, — is typically among the busiest travel days of the year, along with the Wednesday before Thanksgiving.

The days following New Year's Day are also busy as travelers return home from the Christmas holidays.

Surcharges must be included in base prices listed in advertisements and on Web sites, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation.

American Airlines started the meme on Wednesday, United followed along on Thursday, and Delta joined in on Friday.

Delta matches American, United on $10 holiday surcharge [Atlanta Journal-Constitution] (Thanks, Snarkysnake!)

(Photo: elderleaf)

]]>
Consumerist-5368545 Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:00:46 EDT Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5368545&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ British Airways Adds Seat-Selection Fee ]]> With baggage fees, $3 ramen noodles and even fees to let you cut the line, we thought the airline industry had gone about as far as it could to separate passengers from their money while preserving the illusion of selling cheap tickets. But British Airways has one-upped the yanks with a new fee that gives passengers the privilege of selecting their seats more than 24 hours in advance, for a mere £10 to £60.

The BBC reports that, until now, BA passengers couldn't reserve seats more than 24 hours in advance. As of October, though, the airline will retire its last biplane and do what just about every other airline in the world has done for years: let passengers book their seats in advance. However, on BA, the privilege — and yes, the airline does seem to treat it as such — of choosing your own seats, will cost you anywhere from £10 to £60.

A BA spokeswoman said: "Customers frequently request specific seats, but in the past we've only been able to confirm them 24 hours in advance or on the day. "We know people want to secure them in advance and have real control over their flying experience. This will allow them to do that."

BA will still let the skinflints reserve their seats for free at the 24-hour mark. But consumer watchdog Which? warns of the perils facing those unwilling to ante up the extra pounds: "If you aren't quick enough off the mark, you could find yourself sitting on the other side of the plane from your family or partner. It's no way to start a holiday."

British Airways sets seat charges [BBC via Boing Boing]

(Photo: daspaddy)

]]>
Consumerist-5367981 Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:27:07 EDT Marc Perton http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5367981&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways: No Mags For Miles, But Here's A Credit Card ]]> You know those too-bad-to-be-true mailings that offer to let you turn expiring frequent flyer miles into magazine subscriptions? Turns out that, at least in some cases, they're even worse than advertised. Google SEO god Matt Cutts had racked up about 15,000 miles on U.S. Airways, and was looking for a way to cash them in before they expired. The magazines seemed like a better deal than just letting the miles turn to vapor, so he went ahead and ordered a bunch, and waited for them to arrive. And waited. And waited.

Eventually, Cutts began receiving emails from 321mags.com, which U.S. Airways had enlisted to fulfill the orders. Of eight magazines and newspapers Cutts tried to order, he got zero. "That's right," he wrote in his blog. "Not a single magazine or newpaper showed up. Instead, eight different times I was told that an 'overwhelming response' meant that title wasn't available."

By the time all of the magazine offers fell through, Cutts' miles had expired. But his saga doesn't end there. A short while later, U.S. Airways came back with a new offer: He could get his miles back — if he signed up for a shiny new credit card. Cutts declined, and added the followng to his blog: "You know what, U.S. Airways? Just keep the miles. Or better yet, if anyone from the U.S. Airways Dividend Miles program sees this post and wants to do something nice, please donate those miles to charity."

Now, we're sure Matt isn't saying — and we're not implying — that the magazine offers were a ruse in order to run out the clock and then send out the credit card offer. But come on: At least admit that you're not sending out Conde Nast Portfolio because it doesn't exist anymore — not due to "an overwhelming response."

Bad Experience with U.S. Airways Dividend Miles [Matt Cutts]

]]>
Consumerist-5359446 Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:05:31 EDT Marc Perton http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5359446&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ RyanAir Business Plan: Low Fares, Soaring Fees ]]> Ireland's discount airline RyanAir wants to be known as the "Tesco of the skies." (Think "flying Walmart.") The metaphor would apply beautifully if Tesco also charges you a 25 cent unpeeling fee on a 35-cent banana. In the last few years, RyanAir's "ancillary" revenue, or money raked in from fees, has reached £548 million ($914 million USD).

The latest figures were compiled by researchers at Idea-Works, whose spokesman Jay Sorensen said: 'Where I have disagreements with carriers is where the additional fee, such as a charge for booking online, is not optional.

'These fees are really part of the fare. It is disingenuous to pretend they are anything else.'

Oh, yeah, and baggage fees are going up at the beginning of October. But that's the least of your problems if you gamble all your possessions away while on board.

Ryanair rakes in £548m a year from 'stealth costs' [Daily Mail]

RELATED:
Ryanair Supposedly Not Kidding About Installing Pay Toilets
RyanAir To Liven Up Emergencies With Exciting New Escape Fees!
RyanAir: Bye Bye, Checked Bags And Airport Check-In. Hello, Gambling!

]]>
Consumerist-5357001 Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:33:05 EDT Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5357001&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Delta Doesn't Even Have A Customer Service Number Anymore ]]> Are you unhappy with your recent experience with Delta airlines? Would you like to talk to someone about it? Using a telephone? Too bad. Delta doesn't even have a dedicated customer service phone number anymore. If you want to talk to them, like Time's Richard Zoglin did, you will have to call their corporate headquarters on an unpublicized number. You will then be told that they don't accept customer complaints by telephone and be sent back to the website.

From TIME:

A Delta spokeswoman seemed perplexed by the whole question. First she said simply, "We direct customers to our e-mail." After more checking, she reported that Delta does have a customer-care option on its toll-free number. When I couldn't find it, she checked once more and clarified: the customer-care line is found on Delta's main corporate phone number - but that number is not publicized and "it is not suggested" that customers call it. A representative at that number said they do not take customer complaints and directed me to the website.

We find that Google Finance is an excellent tool for escaping these sorts of circular traps.

The Airlines' Customer-Complaint Lines: No Answer [TIME]
(Photo:Zonaphoto)

]]>
Consumerist-5355663 Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:44:14 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5355663&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Southwest Suddenly Decides Man Is Too Fat To Fly — Again ]]> We thought this issue was taken care of the last time a Las Vegas Southwest employee randomly stopped someone from flying without checking to see if they could actually sit in a seat with the arms down (per Southwest's policy), but apparently not. Now a Chicagoland man says he was stopped from boarding a return flight home to Chicago because he was too big (6'2" 350lbs), but he airline wouldn't allow him to prove that he could fit in the seat.

From CBS 2 Chicago:

[The customer] says what's most bothersome to him is that Southwest never tested whether he could actually fit in a seat with the arms down.

"That is absolutely my problem. They didn't test me in any way," he said.

This is, of course, the second time that we've heard of this happening to a Southwest customer at the Vegas airport. Reader Chip, a frequent flier with Southwest who was suddenly too fat to fly, received an apology. In that apology, Southwest cautiously admitted that Chip should have been allowed to demonstrate that he could fit in the seat before being denied boarding.

From Chip's apology:

However, once your situation escalated to a Supervisor and you explained again that you've traveled many, many times without being approached, our Employees should have reevaluated the situation.

I assure you that the appropriate Leaders have been made aware of your concerns. Although we will be unable to share any specifics with you, we are confident our Leaders will address the situation appropriately.

Southwest said the Chicago flyer was ultimately denied boarding because he was angry about being denied boarding and that other passengers were uncomfortable flying with him.

They also said that allowing him to fly from Chicago to Las Vegas in the first place was "a mistake." Surely Southwest can find a more consistent and less newsworthy way to enforce this policy?

Man Says Airline Grounded Him For His Girth [CBS2] (Thanks, Andrew!)
(Photo:Bob Reck)

PREVIOUSLY: Southwest Apologizes To The Frequent Flyer Who Was Suddenly Too Big To Fly

]]>
Consumerist-5354640 Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:47:42 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5354640&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways Will Serve You A Cup Of Ramen For Only $3 ]]> US Airways recently debuted a new snack menu for their coach passengers, and it's posted online.. It's not that it's bad, or even unreasonable. It just makes the snacks at the airport gift shop look like a discount grocery by comparison.

The "Bites" menu is the most confusing, probably because I struggle with the concept of paying someone to pour water in an Instant Lunch cup and serve it to me.

- Quaker Oatmeal Express Golden Brown Sugar $3
- Maruchan Instant Lunch – Chicken $3
- Pringles Chips – Original $3
- Nabisco Mini Oreo Cookies $3
- Twizzlers – Strawberry $3
- Planters Daybreak Blend Apple Cinnamon Trail Mix $4
- Blue Diamond Almonds – Roasted Salted $5

The menu also features a breakfast "Fruit, cheese and meat platter" ($7), sandwiches and salads for dinner, and, interestingly, cocktails for $8. Because there's nothing like a premixed pomegranate martini when flying to a conference in Houston.

If they're going to charge for in-flight meals, this isn't too bad, but the lack of vegetarian options that aren't up in the "snack" column is a little dismaying.

Soda and coffee, however, remain free.

US Airways MarketPlace™ - food, drinks & more (Thanks, Marti!)

]]>
Consumerist-5353167 Sat, 05 Sep 2009 10:30:15 EDT Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5353167&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Want To Cut The Boarding Line On Southwest Airlines? That'll Be $10 ]]> Do you know what the airline industry really needs about now? More fees! Luckily, Southwest Airlines is happy to oblige. They're now charging a $10 fee to customers who want to board the plane before everyone else.

The fee doesn't apply to "Business Select" passengers or elite frequent flyers, who get to board before the coach class masses do. Southwest famously doesn't have assigned seating, so this gives passengers a chance to jump the line and snuggle up to a nice window seat if they so desire. Harmless enough. But as the Wall Street Journal's travel blog notes,

Southwest needs to find ways to increase revenue even though the airline isn't growing as fast as it used to. Fees may be a big factor. And EarlyBird check-in fees could well be an early-bird sign that bag fees aren't far off.

Indeed. Other signs that Southwest is having trouble: the airline is being investigated by the FAA for using unauthorized parts on its fleet, and is also cutting back on flights.

FAA Investigates Southwest Over Parts [Wall Street Journal]
Nickel and Diming at Southwest Airlines? [WSJ Travel Blog]

(Photo: zonaphoto)

]]>
Consumerist-5352244 Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:00:12 EDT Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5352244&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ People Love Airplane Wi-Fi, But They Don't Love Paying For It ]]> The WSJ's latest "Middle Seat" column is about that holy grail for all internet-lovers — airplane Wi-Fi. It turns out that people love, love, love it... but pay for it? Nah.

According to the article, "in tests and now in regular service, usage drops off considerably when travelers must pay for the service." Even Alaska Airlines, which only charges $1, saw a steep drop off in usage.

People think Wi-Fi should be free and some won't use it if it's not:

"It's good for them to offer it, but would I pay for it? Probably not,'' said Alex Smith, a business traveler from Cincinnati.

Mike Duguay from Boston used a free trial of Gogo on an AirTran flight earlier this week and decided he would pay for it on his flight home from Dallas.

"It should be free, but if you have to pay, I'll definitely still use it," he said. "Access in the air kills the boredom.''

In the Air, Wi-Fi Gets a Ho-Hum Reception [WSJ]
(Photo:kevindean)

]]>
Consumerist-5348058 Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:49:56 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5348058&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ American Airlines Raises Baggage Fees For Flights Abroad ]]> If you thought you could escape American Airlines' increased domestic baggage fees by only flying abroad, think again: AA is raising checked bag fees for some international flights to Europe and India.

The first bag will remain free but the second bag will now cost $50. Last month, AA raised the fees for checked bags on domestic flights by $5 per bag.

(Photo: balmes)

]]>
Consumerist-5347849 Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:16:52 EDT Alex Chasick http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5347849&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Breaking Down Airline Safety Records ]]> The Daily Beast says it has determined which airlines in the U.S. are the safest by comparing the global statistics for the 25 airlines with the best safety records and those with the worst. Which is the safest? The answer may come as a surprise, since this methodology showed that AirTran is the safest national carrier.

AirTran? Really? Turns out that the discount carrier once known as ValuJet has turned safety into a priority.

"It has been a great five years for us in which our continual dedication to safety has paid off," says Christopher White, a spokesman for AirTran. "Our 8,500 crew members make safety their No. 1 priority every day.

Meanwhile, United, accused of being the least safe of the major airlines, wasn't impressed with the analysis. "It is difficult for us to comment on these figures because we do not know the methodology behind them," said a United spokesperson.

You can see the Daily Beast's results, here.

One interesting bit of information from the article is that the age of the actual aircraft in which you're flying has less of an impact on safety than how long ago that particular model was designed. In aviation writer CLive Irving's analysis of the research, he noted:

Last December a Continental 737 [designed in the 1950s] taking off from Denver aborted at the last second and, in icy conditions, skidded into a ravine. Thirty eight passengers were injured. The 737's fuselage broke apart behind the wings, a failure typical of a design of that age.

Now look at the Miracle on the Hudson. The Airbus A320 [designed in the 1980s] hit the water at around 160 mph, a considerable impact. The fuselage remained in one piece, everybody got out. I doubt very much that would have been true in the case of a 737. Add to that the ability of the A320's fly-by-wire controls to give Captain Sully Sullenberger a stable attitude on very little backup power and the Airbus technology is proved to be a real life saver.


How Safe Is Your Airline?
[The Daily Beast]
What to Know About Airline Safety Records [The Daily Beast]

(Photo: Chris Rief aka Spodie Odie)

]]>
Consumerist-5345759 Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:25:01 EDT Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5345759&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways Raising Bag Fees By $5 On Most Flights ]]> Providing that you check your bags online at least one hour before your flight, US Airways says it will begin charging $20, instead of $15, for the first checked bag and $30, instead of $25, for the second. Those who choose to check bags at the airport can expect $25 for the first and $35 for the second, an increase of $5 per bag.

Elite frequent fliers, first-class passengers, and active-duty military personnel are exempt from the fees.

Here's a lovely chart they have provided for your edification.


Baggage policy [US Airways]
(Photo:balmes)

]]>
Consumerist-5347270 Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:17:30 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5347270&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Let Sun Tzu Be Your Travel Buddy ]]> Reader Anil sent us this post that adapts Sun Tzu's The Art of War for battles at the airport ticket counter.

Most of the suggestions revolve around tips we've written about before: be polite but firm, know when to escalate your complaint, and give good feedback if the employee helping you goes above and beyond.

Use Sun Tzu's The Art of War to Win Battles at the Ticket Counter [foxnomad]
(Photo: eBelinda)

]]>
Consumerist-5346300 Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:41:46 EDT Alex Chasick http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5346300&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Gee, There Was A 6 Hour Tarmac Delay At New York's JFK Airport ]]> So, we've recently noticed that the new cool thing for airlines to say when they mess up is some variation of, "We tried to make them comfortable," as if they were escorting you to meet your maker instead of transporting you to Minnesota to see your grandmother and eat "bars." We think this is creepy. We think they should stop saying this.

According to USAToday, Sun Country Flight 242 to Minneapolis was "supposed to take off from New York City on Friday about 11 a.m. local time. But passengers say the plane didn't start boarding until about noon, and didn't take off until after 6 p.m."

After about 3 hours a food cart arrived but there apparently wasn't enough food for all 100 passengers.

From USAToday:

"Our flight crew did everything in their power to make the passengers as comfortable as possible and to keep them informed," [Sun County chief executive Stan Gadek] said.

The passengers will be given refunds.

Sun Country fliers endure 6-hour ground delay at JFK [USAToday]

]]>
Consumerist-5344136 Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:10:46 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5344136&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Southwest Customer Exposes Self, Punches Another Passenger, Then Strips Naked ]]> Here's an issue you probably didn't expect to run into on your flight from Oakland to Las Vegas. According to the SF Chronicle, a man exposed himself, then punched a passenger who screamed. After that, he decided to strip naked and resist while flight attendants and other passengers subdued him. The flight was turned around and both the man and the woman he punched were taken to the hospital. They apparently don't know each other, and the man is wanted on drug charges.

A passenger gave the paper a picture she took on her cellphone camera as the man was being arrested by quite a few uniformed individuals. We counted 6, but that might be another one behind him. We're not sure.

The paper says 10 sheriff's deputies boarded the plane.

Passenger takes it all off, plane turns around [SF Chronicle]
(Photo:Danielle Lichliter / Special to The Chronicle)

]]>
Consumerist-5342958 Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:44:56 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5342958&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Wi-Fi Coming To Southwest Airlines Next Year ]]> Southwest says a test of Wi-Fi on its planes was successful, so they're going to expand the service to all of their planes next year.

"We have concluded our testing for inflight Wi-Fi and are very happy with both the technical performance of the system and the response of customers who have used it," said Dave Ridley, Southwest Airlines senior vice president of marketing and revenue management, in a statement.

We love the trend of airlines getting Wi-Fi. We can't wait until their customers are helping us liveblog tarmac delays as they happen.

Southwest Air Preps To Fly With Wi-Fi
[InformationWeek]
(Photo:Zonaphoto)

]]>
Consumerist-5342854 Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:38:01 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5342854&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dave Carroll Launches Second "United Breaks Guitars" Song And Video ]]> Musician Dave Carroll hit the jackpot with his first song, "United Breaks Guitars," last month. The song, the video, and the subsequent media coverage formed a perfect anti-ad for United's poor handling of customer property. Now he's released the second of his planned three-song cycle and this one has more of a "we could have had something together" feel to it. Like any sequel, it's about 600 times more elaborate. We'll always love "United Breaks Guitars" most of all, but it's great to see Carroll continue his one-man shaming of an airline for not doing the right thing when it had the chance.

"United Breaks Guitars: Song 2" [YouTube] (Thanks to Steve!)

]]>
Consumerist-5340297 Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:41:10 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5340297&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ American Airlines Misplaces Your Grandmother, Twice ]]> Every once in awhile we post a sad story about someone's 85-year-old grandmother being left at the gate because nobody came to push the wheelchair. This is one of those stories. The difference, however, is that in this case American Airlines left the woman at the gate, apologized, got her a hotel, brought her back, and left her with a Skycap. She missed the second flight too.

The abandoned woman isn't even angry at the airline. She says she loves flying and will do it again. Her kids, however are not in a very good mood after hours of wondering what happened to their mother.

The trouble started Tuesday. Ms. Jones had a connecting flight at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. She made the connection in time, but no one pushed her wheelchair down the jetway.

After the gate agent realized what had happened, he called her family and American Airlines arranged for food and a hotel room. The following morning Ms. Jones was returned to the Terminal and left with a Skycap. Nobody helped her to her gate and she missed the second flight, too. Eventually she was upgraded to first class and given a $100 voucher for a future flight.

Ms. Jones' family says that they are upset about the lack of communication from AA.

From WFAA:

"It's just a simple human error," said Tim Wagner, an American Airlines spokesman. "We apologized profusely to Ms. Jones. We've done everything we've been able to do to make her comfortable."

American Airlines forgets grandmother at gate [WFAA]

]]>
Consumerist-5336804 Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:42:46 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5336804&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ JetBlue's $599 Unlimited Travel Pass: Great Deal Or Great Gimmick? ]]> Are you planning a vacation that involves spending large expanses of time waiting around in airports? Good news! JetBlue's new unlimited travel pass may be for you! For only $599, you can fly as many times as you'd like between the cities that JetBlue serves.

What's the inevitable catch?

...Ray Neidl, an independent airline analyst, said it's "not quite as crazy as it sounds on the surface."

He said that JetBlue has a limited number of routes and often has fares of $99. So, while the San Francisco example above makes it sound like a great deal, Neidl said, some passengers might need to make six trips to make it worthwhile.

"There are not a lot of people who can travel that much," he said. "It's students or retirees."

By September, of course, students are back in school, so they aren't ideal candidates for this promotion. You just know that someone is going to find a way to fly to all of the cities JetBlue serves using the pass during the promotion month, and write a blog about it.

Ridiculously Cheap Travel Deals: JetBlue Offers Unlimited Flights for $599 [ABC News]
All-You-Can-Jet Pass [JetBlue]

(Photo: mrkathika)

]]>
Consumerist-5335965 Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:46:13 EDT Laura Northrup http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5335965&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Transportation Secretary Would Like To Ask Continental A Few Questions ]]> The horrific tarmac delay in Rochester, MN has come to the attention of Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. LaHood apparently has a blog, and on it he's asking some questions about the delay.

LaHood says:

Basically, we want to know what I think all of us want to know:

1. Why the flight was diverted to Rochester, Minnesota, in particular;
2. Which carrier, Continental or Express Jet, was responsible for the well-being of the passengers and, in particular, which carrier's contingency plan was implemented during the tarmac delay;
3. Whether Continental/ExpressJet had in place at Rochester procedures regarding the deplaning of passengers on diverted flights at diversion airports without TSA presence and if not, why not;
4. Whether such procedures were implemented with respect to flight 2816 and if not, why not;
5. Why flight 2816 was forced to stay on the ground at Rochester for as long as it did; and
6. An explanation of the passenger's treatment during the delay, including once they were inside the airport terminal.

The letter also asks Continental for similar information about other recent delays.

What will he do with this information?

... DOT has a rulemaking in progress that proposes to require airlines to take certain steps to deal with lengthy tarmac delays, including establishing contingency plans that meet basic passenger needs during a lengthy tarmac delay. Some have proposed that DOT go further and set a time limit for carriers to deplane passengers. While I can't comment on the merits of the proposed rule yet, we will use the information Continental provides to help us reach a decision about what direction to go in that rulemaking.

Outrage on tarmac delays—you want to know, DOT wants to know [DOT Blog]

]]>
Consumerist-5334979 Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:59:49 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5334979&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 47 Passengers, Including Two Babies, Trapped On Continental Flight For 11 Hours ]]> When will airlines realize that when a flight gets diverted and things go wrong — you just should not force people to stay on an airplane for 11 hours with only a bag of pretzels to eat. What was ExpressJet's (operator of the Continental flight) excuse? The TSA screeners had gone home for the night, so they couldn't let anyone get back on the plane if they let them off. Oh no!

The Minneapolis Star-Tribune says that the horror story started when a flight from Houston to Minneapolis was diverted to Rochester because of severe weather. In case you're not awesome at MN geography, Rochester is only about 80 miles from the Minneapolis airport.

At this point the flight crew apparently hit its limit on flying time, and a new crew was needed. The company says it refused to let the passengers off the plane because the TSA screeners had left and "passengers legally couldn't get back on the plane."

KARE 11 interviewed a passenger who describes the scene on the plane:

"Everybody in the plane was kind-of moving, trying to find positions to sleep in," Christin said. "There wasn't any room, the plane was getting warmer."

Christin says at least two babies were on board and they cried throuhgout the night.

"The smells were getting worse, the bathroom was getting worse," he says. "The babies had obviously started going to the bathroom."

He also says that no one offered the passengers any food after landing in Rochester.

The airline says the airport didn't have enough personnel to allow people to sleep in the terminal and claims that they tried to find a bus but failed to locate one. In all the passengers boarded the plane at 7:30pm, waiting two hours to take off, then were not allowed to get off the plane until 6:30am the following morning. At 9:30am they reboarded the plane and finally arrived at their destination at around 11am.

Nightmare flight [USAToday]
47 passengers spend night on airplane [KARE 11]
47 trapped on 'nightmare' flight to the Twin Cities [MST]
(Photo:spinadelic)

]]>
Consumerist-5333979 Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:54:59 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5333979&view=rss&microfeed=true