<![CDATA[Consumerist: ACSI]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: ACSI]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/acsi http://consumerist.com/tag/acsi <![CDATA[ Why Sprint Has The Lowest Customer Satisfaction ]]>

Brett sent us a story perfectly illustrating why Sprint has really crappy customer satisfaction ratings. While the other cellphone service providers scores hover slightly under the national ACSI average of 75, Sprint's are a dismal 56. It must be because of too many situations like the following danse macabre of incompetence:

1. Brett can't get coverage around his house
2. Tech support ineffective in solving this problem
3. Told he could cancel without ETF
4. Cancels, ETF taken out of his checking account anyway
5. Has so far spent four months calling and refaxing documents, still doesn't have his money back.

Possible solution: Call the Sprint Consumerist executive customer service line at 703-433-4401.

]]>
Consumerist-5010683 Fri, 23 May 2008 09:46:01 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5010683&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ American Customer Satisfaction Drops ]]> The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) dropped again for the second consecutive quarter to 74.9. Why does this matter? "When customer satisfaction declines, consumers have less enthusiasm for repeating experiences that no longer provide the same gratification," says Professor Claes Fornell. AKA, they'll be spending less money.

Customer Satisfaction Falls Again; Retail, Financial Services Down; Wal-mart, Home Depot at All-Time Lows [ACSI]

]]>
Consumerist-372560 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:17:22 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372560&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Latest ACSI Survey Is Out: You Really Like Dollar General ]]> ACSI Department Store Rankings The American Customer Satisfaction Index has released its latest scores of retail businesses, so we thought we'd take a look at the department store rankings by constructing a handy graph. When it comes to customer satisfaction, apparently Dollar General is doing something right—and Wal-Mart, as usual, is doing lots of things wrong.

con_acsiq407-deptstores-lar.jpg
 
In the commentary on last quarters scores, ACSI says they've started including Nordstrom again because of its increasing market share, and back before it dropped off the survey in 2001, it held the top spot frequently, so no surprise there.

They also suggest that Dollar General, "which typically serves neighborhoods that may be too small to attract Wal-Mart," may be scoring high because of its wide variety of items in such small retail spaces.

Sears and Kmart are pretty much exactly where we'd expect them after their plunging customer service last year.

One thing we're not sure about is how the various recall disasters last year affected scores—clearly Dollar General emerged unscathed, despite its healthy dose of lead-tainted toys, Halloween pails, and holiday decorations.

"Q4 2007 and Historical ACSI Scores" [ACSI]
"Customer Satisfaction Falls Again; Retail, Financial Services Down; Wal-mart, Home Depot at All-Time Lows" [ACSI]

RELATED
"How are ACSI data collected?" [ACSI]

(Thanks to Shaula!)

]]>
Consumerist-359148 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:27:36 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=359148&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ DirecTV Raises Rates, Warns Customers Not To Switch To Cable ]]> DirecTV is jacking up rates by 4% as of February 27 and is reminding newly disgruntled customers that DirecTV still ranks higher than cable according to the American Customer Satisfaction Index. Most customers can expect a $3-$5 increase, but don't count on award-winning customer service.

Here are the new rates:

  • PREMIER™ $104.99/mo.;
  • LO MÁXIMO™ $104.99/mo.;
  • PLUS HD DVR™ $72.99/mo.;
  • PLUS DVR™ $62.99/mo.;
  • CHOICE XTRA™ $57.99/mo.;
  • FAMILIAR ULTRA™ $54.99/mo.;
  • CHOICE™ $52.99/mo.;
  • FAMILIAR™ $45.99/mo.;
  • PREFERRED CHOICE™ $32.99/mo.;
  • SELECT $45.99/mo.
Everyone with a package that isn't still offered will pay an extra $3. Customers with a promotional rate won't see an increase unless they switch packages.

DirecTV's email to customers:

Effective February 27, 2008, the monthly price of some DIRECTV® programming packages will change.

Please click here (PDF) for pricing information in English and Spanish.

[...]

For seven years running, DIRECTV has had higher customer satisfaction ratings than cable, thanks to loyal customers like you. Thank you for your business.

Sincerely,
DIRECTV, Inc.

According to the ACSI, DirecTV earned a D- in customer satisfaction, slightly beating out cable's failing grade.
http://consumerist.com/assets/resources/2008/01/ACSI%20Truth-thumb.jpg
Not exactly service to boast about.

Q1 2007 and Historical ACSI Scores [American Customer Satisfaction Index]
(Photo: cmorran123)

]]>
Consumerist-349448 Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:42:16 EST Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=349448&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ TSA Declares Victory, Achieves Same Vaunted Status As IRS ]]> The IRS is celebrating the results of an AP poll that ranks the TSA as the most hated arm of the federal government. More than anything, Americans apparently hate being inconvenienced by seemingly pointless and arbitrary security checks.

The AP poll, conducted Monday through Wednesday, found that the more people travel, the less they like TSA.

But it also found that 53% of air travelers think TSA does a "very" or "somewhat" good job.

The inconvenience of security was the top complaint of air travelers, mentioned by 31% of those who had taken at least one trip in the past year. That figure rose to 40% for those who have taken five to 10 trips.

TSA's parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security, also ranked at the bottom of an index of consumer satisfaction released this week, supplanting the IRS as the prime subject of grumbling in that survey. The authoritative American Customer Satisfaction Index questioned 10,000 people about their experiences with the federal government.

But it's all our fault. We just don't appreciate that the TSA is working overtime to bring us a Safe And Secure Society (TM) using complex science-driven techniques that we should not mock.
Behavioral observation and document checking are proving to be the most successful in rooting out would-be terrorists, [Administrator Kip Hawley] said. Screeners do catch people who try to bring guns onto planes. "But they're not terrorists. They're just stupid," he said. Terrorists know better than to try to bring prohibited items through security, he said.
That's right. The fidgety terrorist with the forged passport, he's feeling fine because he knew to leave the Purell at home.

Poll: Travelers dislike TSA as much as IRS [AP]
(Photo: Getty Images)

]]>
Consumerist-337144 Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:45:05 EST Carey Alexander http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=337144&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Mainly driven by higher food prices, the ... ]]> Mainly driven by higher food prices, the American Customer Satisfaction Index went down for the first time in two years of continual growth. The blip was minus .1%, still up 1% from a year ago. [ACSI]

]]>
Consumerist-329480 Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:19:32 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=329480&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Consumerist ACSI Fund 1st Check In ]]> magnifyingglass.jpgDoes higher customer satisfaction lead to better stock performance?

After reading a scientific article in the Journal of Science claiming exactly that, we put together two mock stock portfolios. One contained companies that both scored in the top 20% of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) relative to their competition and beat the national ACSI average. The other was the reverse, companies scoring in the bottom 20% and having scores lower than the national mean.

Since May, when the portfolios began, the ACSI fund is down 5.63%. The ANTI-ACSI fund is down 8.16%. Also, we messed up. Overview inside...

acsifund.jpg

antiacsi.jpg

It's much too early to draw any sort of conclusion whatsoever but we thought you might be interested in seeing how they were doing so far.

We realized two things we did very wrong:
1) We're a month behind in reporting the changes, somehow we miscalculated 4 months (we figured for four months in advance, rather than four months inclusive... doh!)

2) The ACSI index covers over 200 companies, but it only releases new scores for a limited number of industries each quarter. That is, different industries take turns getting reported each quarter and you don't see the industries next set of scores until 12 months later. Therefore... we have a bunch of number crunching to do and have to evaluate and buy a crapload more companies, backdated to their May prices when the experiment began. Good thing we're only playing with imaginary money!

PREVIOUSLY:
The Consumerist ACSI Fund v2.0
How To Beat The Stock Market: Buy Companies With High Customer Satisfaction Scores

]]>
Consumerist-297989 Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:27:09 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=297989&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Consumerist ACSI Fund v2.0 ]]> stocktrader.jpgBased on your suggestions, we redid The Consumerist ACSI fund mock portfolio. We changed it from 100 shares to $1000 worth of each company, rounded down to whole shares. This way the highest stocks won't have an undue influence on the portfolio's performance.

We also made the The Consumerist ANTI-ASCI fund, buying only companies performing in the bottom 20% on the ACSI relative to their competition and having ACSI scores below the national average.

Peek at our portfolios...


acsifund2.jpg

antiacsi.jpg

We know, ha ha, the ANTI-ACSI is outperforming the ACSI. Even if it was the other way around, you can't tell anything from a mere 2 hours and 20 minutes of the market being open...

In that spirit, Correlation does not equal causation. To truly see the experiment's hypothesis out, it will need to run for far longer than any of us will probably be writing this blog. Something like 10 years, ya know?

Even still, we'll have fun tracking the funds' progress, and seeing if it might be true that company's with higher scores on the American Customer Satisfaction Index outperform the market indexes. — BEN POPKEN

NOTES:
* Made these charts with Google Finance's portfolio function.
* It's easier to find companies below the national ACSI average than above it.
* Samsung was excluded as they're not public ally traded on the American stock market.

PREVIOUSLY: The Consumerist ACSI Fund

(Photo: Getty Images)

]]>
Consumerist-262136 Mon, 21 May 2007 12:22:28 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=262136&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Consumerist ACSI Fund ]]> We made a mock portfolio buying 100 shares of companies scoring high on the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI).

These companies are in the top 20% on the ACSI scale relative to their competition, and their score is higher than the national ACSI average (75.2).

We used the same methodology as an article in the Journal of Marketing whose backtested portfolio outperformed the major indexes by 93%

We'll monitor the portfolio and see if you can really beat the stock market by buying companies with high customer satisfaction. — BEN POPKEN

PREVIOUSLY: How To Beat The Stock Market: Buy Companies With High Customer Satisfaction Scores

]]>
Consumerist-261794 Fri, 18 May 2007 18:59:16 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=261794&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How To Beat The Stock Market: Buy Companies With High Customer Satisfaction Scores ]]> Using a back-tested paper portfolio and an actual case, the authors of a study published in the Journal of Marketing found that companies at the top 20% of the the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) greatly outperformed the the stock market, generating a 40% return.

From 1996-2003, the portfolio outperformed the Dow Jones Industrial Average by 93%, the S&P 500 by 201%, and NASDAQ by 335%.

Past performance doesn't indicate future results. ACSI only goes back to 1994. However, these startling findings help vindicate one of our central claims: investing in customer service and satisfaction is good for your bottom line.

"Cost-cutting" and "profit-enhancing" measures like outsourcing all your tech support to India, creating a byzantine apparatus for warranty repairs, and using rebate systems designed to trip up your customers will only hurt you in the long run. — BEN POPKEN

Customer Satisfaction and Stock Prices: High Returns, Low Risk (PDF)

RELATED:
Most And Least Improved Companies In Customer Satisfaction Since 1994
Customer Satisfaction Winners And Losers
Customer Satisfaction Up Thanks To Lower Prices, Not Increased Quality


acis1.jpg

acis2.jpg

acis3.jpg

acis4.jpg

acis5.jpg

acis6.jpg

acis7.jpg

acis8.jpg

acis9.jpg

acispage10.jpg

acis11.jpg

acis12.jpg

]]>
Consumerist-261282 Thu, 17 May 2007 13:02:16 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=261282&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Most And Least Improved Companies In Customer Satisfaction Since 1994 ]]> We're obsessed excited by this ACSI data so let's slice it another way!

Here's the Best and Worst on the ACIS Q1 2007 index, based on how much their customer satisfaction score has improved or worsened relative to their competitors since 1994, when the study began.

BEST
Airlines: Continental +3
Cable & Satellite TV: DirecTV -4.3
Cellphone Service: T-mobile +9.4
Cellphone Makers: Motorola +2.9
Energy Utilities: Sempra Energy +19.4
Fixed Line Telephone Service: Verizon -1.4
Hotels: Holiday Inn +4.3
Limited Service Restaurants: Domino's +11.9

WORST
Airlines: Delta -23.4
Cable & Satellite TV: Charter Communications -12.7
Cellphone Makers: Samsung -4.1
Cellphone Service: AT&T/Cingular -2.9
Energy Utilities: Ameren Corporation -26.9
Fixed Line Telephone Service: AT&T -17.6
Hotels: Ramada -1.4
Limited Service Restaurants: Papa John's, Starbucks +1.3

You may be surprised to see stastics that don't jive with your personal experience with the company. That's because you're just one person while these numbers are based on interviews with around 80,000 other people. — BEN POPKEN

RELATED:
Customer Satisfaction Winners And Losers
Customer Satisfaction Up Thanks To Lower Prices, Not Increased Quality

]]>
Consumerist-260691 Tue, 15 May 2007 17:15:57 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=260691&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Customer Satisfaction Winners And Losers ]]> Here are the winners and losers on the American Customer Satisfaction Index for industries of particular interest to Consumerist readers. The scores are out of 100. Format is company name (score, difference from last year's score).

WINNERS
Airlines: Southwest (76, +2.7)
Cellphone Service: Verizon (71, +2.9)
Cellphone Makers: Nokia, Motorola (72, +4.3, +1.4)
Cable & Satellite TV: Echostar (67, -1.5)
Energy Utilities: Southern Company (82, +2.5)
Fixed Line Telephone Service: Verizon, Qwest (72, +4.3, +2.9)
Limited Service Restaurants: Wendy's (78, +2.6)

LOSERS
Airlines: United Airlines (56, -11.1)
Cellphones: Sprint (61, -3.2)
Cellphone Makers: Samsung (70, -4.1)
Cable & Satellite TV: Charter Communications (55, 0)
Energy Utilities: Ameren Corporation (57, -23)
Fixed Line Telephone Service: Embarq (66, +3.1)
Limited Service Restaurants: McDonald's (64, +1.6)

— BEN POPKEN

ACSI Quarterly Scores [ACSI]
Most And Least Improved Companies In Customer Satisfaction Since 1994
Customer Satisfaction Up Thanks To Lower Prices, Not Increased Quality

]]>
Consumerist-260518 Tue, 15 May 2007 09:56:32 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=260518&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Customer Satisfaction Up Thanks To Lower Prices, Not Increased Quality ]]> The first quarter results for the much-watched American Customer Satisfaction Index were released today. While satisfaction us up .40% from last quarter, a high, it belies a sluggishness in product and service quality. Instead, the ACSI finds the increased satisfaction is due to lower prices. Professor Claes Fornell writes:

But if the increase in quality is minor and ACSI growth is driven mostly by lower prices, or an absence of price increases, satisfaction becomes vulnerable to more volatility because prices change much quicker than quality.... Pricing power depends on upward shifting demand curves. But an upward shift is unlikely unless there is shrinking supply or higher levels of buyer satisfaction. There are no signs of the former in most industries, so the latter becomes more critical.
Good product quality and customer service and starting to look like a savvy business decision yet? — BEN POPKEN

ACSI Quarter Commentaries Q1 2007 [ACSI]
ACSI Quarterly Scores [ACSI]
Most And Least Improved Companies In Customer Satisfaction Since 1994
Customer Satisfaction Winners And Losers

]]>
Consumerist-260511 Tue, 15 May 2007 09:35:04 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=260511&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Customer Satisfaction At All Time High ]]> Consumers, you're satisfied? From CNN Money:

University of Michigan's American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) increased to an overall 74.9 score out of 100 in the fourth quarter of 2006, its highest level since the survey first started in 1994. That's a gain of almost 2 percent from the previous year and a 0.7 increase from the previous quarter.
So who is winning and who is losing?

Home Depot raised their score, while Lowe's dropped 5.1%. Lowe's is still winning overall. "Elsewhere, consumers tabbed wholesale club operator Costco with the highest satisfaction numbers among retailers, while electronics seller Best Buy had the biggest jump in its score."

In banking, Wachovia was the clear winner for the sixth year in a row. —MEGHANN MARCO

Customer Satisfaction Hits All Time High [CNNMoney]

(Photo: tellumo)

]]>
Consumerist-238058 Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:59:25 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=238058&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Holiday Shopper Survey: Netflix Top, CDW Bottom ]]> A survey of 10,000+ consumers ranked the best and worst shopping sites during the the 2006 holiday season.

Netflix, Amazon, and LL Bean emerged flush and aglow, while CompUSA, Costco and CDW scraped the bottom of the felch bucket.

Full results inside...

shopperhappiness.jpg

— BEN POPKEN

Holiday Shopping: Netflix, Amazon, LL Bean, QVC Lead Top E-Tailers [Business Wire]

]]>
Consumerist-224571 Wed, 27 Dec 2006 14:19:53 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=224571&view=rss&microfeed=true