<![CDATA[Consumerist: Manhattan]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Manhattan]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/manhattan http://consumerist.com/tag/manhattan <![CDATA[ Subway Launches Text Message Ordering In NYC ]]> Subway has launched a pilot program called SubwayNow where New York City residents (Manhattan only at the moment, it looks like) can register to place pick-up orders via text message. According to IntoMobile, after registering with your address and providing payment info, which they keep on file, you set up a list of sandwich orders that are saved as a personal menu. When you're ready to use the service, you text "menu" to the Subway shortcode, and Subway sends back your pre-set menu. Then you text back the menu item you want, and Subway responds with a pick-up time.

It sounds convenient once you've jumped through the registration hoops, although the clear downside is you're storing credit card info on a third-party site, which is the sort of thing that always seems to come back up as a bad idea when a company's database is breached. If you're comfortable with that risk, however, have at it.

"Subway launches sandwich ordering via SMS in New York City" [IntoMobile]

]]>
Consumerist-5142408 Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:19:21 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5142408&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 99-Cent ATMs At NYC McDonald's ]]> Tip for the savvy traveler visiting New York: all the McDonald's in New York have ATMs with only 99-cent fees. However you will probably have to put up with a freelance "doorman" bumming for change on your way out.

(Photo: freakapotimus)

]]>
Consumerist-5032696 Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:24:25 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5032696&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Modell's Beats Any Price, As Long As It's Not On Sale ]]> Modell's own peculiar definition of "low price guarantee, we will beat any ad" surprised reader Randy when he tried to get them to honor it on a baseball glove he bought, as it would even the most casual student of Logic or Semantics. He writes:

I bought a baseball glove at Modell's a couple of weeks ago (in Manhattan.) I was in a hurry and so didn't have a lot of time to shop around or wait for delivery. I found one I liked at paid $49.99 for it. On the back of the receipt, it says the following: "MO'S LOW PRICE GUARANTEE" WE WILL BEAT ANY AD... ANY DAY AND REFUND 25% OF THE DIFFERENCE See stores for details." A little while later, I noticed that Dick's Sporting Goods and the Sports Authority were both selling the glove for $29.99. So, I went back to the store with a copy of one of their ads and asked about the guarantee, hoping to get either the difference, 25% of the difference, or, most logically, 125% of the difference - that would be "beating" the price, right? The response I got was surprising, to say the least.

According to the clerk, they would only match their own prices. That is, if the price drops later, they'll match it... I think. This seemed wholly inconsistent with the idea of "beating any ad." After all, wouldn't their policy be more like, "We'll match our own subsequent lower price!" ??

My gut instinct told me that this couldn't be right, or perhaps it was just an NYC thing. After all, we get screwed on specials all the time. So, I called their corporate number to find out what the official policy was. I spoke with a very nice lady named "Melanie" who said that the clerk was in fact slightly misinformed. Here's the actual policy:

Modell's will beat a competitor's REGULAR price. However, since I was looking at a sale price, they couldn't match it.

I politely asked her how often competitor's advertise their regular prices - isn't the whole point of the advertisement, typically, to show what's on sale? She said that yes, in fact, that did seem odd, but that that was the policy. No price match for me - it was on sale.

Essentially, Modell's will guarantee that their products are being sold at MSRP. Hooray!

Ah, we get it now. See store for details means "see store for the details of our non-participatory caveats and disclaimers." If that's the way they're going to play, I definitely don't "Gotta Go To Mo's."

]]>
Consumerist-5027954 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:53:44 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5027954&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ VIDEO: Activist Bum Rushes iPhone Line With Flag Pony ]]> The first person in line at the 5th Ave Apple store in Manhattan was some kind of activist Daniel Bowman Simon, part of a group who camped out in front of The Cube for over a week, hoping to use it as an opportunity to bring exposure to issues of, "sustainability, affordable housing, energy security, and locally-grown food," who tried to bumrush the applauding Apple receiving line of Apple employees and penetrate The Cube with what appears to be a metal/aluminum-foil horse carrying an American flag. The world may never know now knows exactly what sort of brilliant political statement he was trying to make as he was quickly intercepted by burly security guards who jettisoned him away to make room for more obedient cult members. Video, inside...

[via CNET]

RELATED: Who would wait a week in line for an iPhone 3G? [Fortune]

]]>
Consumerist-5024329 Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:41:54 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5024329&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Turkey subs from Subways in Manhattan now ... ]]> Turkey subs from Subways in Manhattan now cost $11.03! [East Village Idiot]

]]>
Consumerist-331397 Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:04:04 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=331397&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Parking in New York is such a hassle that ... ]]> Parking in New York is such a hassle that NYPD cops have no choice but to park in front of hydrants when they patronize Victoria's Secret and get sandwiches from the bodega. [The Red Tape Chronicles]

]]>
Consumerist-290541 Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:59:11 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=290541&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Victoria's Secret Refunds: Immigrants Need Not Apply ]]>

July 2, 2007

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL

Leslie H. Wexner
CEO, Limited Brands Inc
THREE LIMITED PKWY
P.O. Box 16000
Columbus, OH 43216

Sharon J. Turney
President and Chief Executive Officer, Victoria's Secret
CEO, Limited Brands Inc
THREE LIMITED PKWY
P.O. Box 16000
Columbus, OH 43216

Dear Mr. Wexner & Ms. Turney,

I write to inform you of an incident that occurred this Saturday at your Victoria's Secret store located in SoHo, Manhattan at 565 Broadway (Store #774). Despite producing an original sales receipt, the credit card used to make the purchase AND a United States Permanent Resident Card (commonly known as a "green card"), I was denied the right to return a $24.99 bra that I purchased just one week and one day earlier. Your manager, Jackie, cited a "new return policy" that deems my U.S. government issued identification worthless in the eyes of your undergarment retail giant.

It all began when I attempted to return a bra that I had purchased for my mother (she didn't like the color) at another one of your stores located in Westchester County on the 22nd of June. The bra was just one portion of a purchase totaling $93!! After waiting on line for nearly 10 minutes, only to be told that I had to go to a different register because, unbeknownst to me, returns were being processed at one specific terminal, After waiting on line again, I was greeted by a very rude and condescending cashier. I produced the bra and my receipt (copy annexed) along with the credit card used to make the purchase. After starting the return process, the clerk requested photo identification. My student ID wasn't sufficient, nor was a credit card bearing my photo.

Given no other options, I reached into the depths of my wallet to pull out a form of identification that I use a total of once or twice a year when I travel on vacation to Europe. I don't even like to carry it around with me. It is the most precious and most official form of identification that I posses. It is my Permanent Resident Card issued by the United States Department of Immigration and Naturalization!

If you are unfamiliar with the Permanent Resident Card, in addition to bearing my name, a photo and a fingerprint, it also contains a plethora of other personal data regarding my immigration status. I am always reluctant to share this information with anyone but those who have a legitimate need for it ( i.e. Airport Customs & Security).

Like a good million (or four!) other New York City residents, I do not have a drivers license because I DO NOT DRIVE! While I was a bit hesitant to hand the Victoria's

Secret cashier my Permanent Resident Card, I had already invested 20 minutes of my personal time to make the still incomplete return, and so I caved and handed it over.

To my utter dismay and disbelief, the cashier nastily responded, "I can't use this, this is no good." After requesting to speak to a supervisor, Jackie, the manager on duty, cited a "new return policy" that demanded the production of either a drivers license or passport. According to Jackie, the new computerized return system "will not accept the numbers" on my green card. I even offered to accept store credit in lieu of a cash refund (which in hindsight, I was weak for even suggesting. I have a RIGHT to return the merchandise. It says so on the receipt!). There were no exceptions, according to Jackie. I could not return the bra.

To have a retail store tell you that your Permanent Resident Card, an identification document issued by the United States federal government, a document that sufficiently establishes my right to live here, to exit and enter this country without a visa, a card that proves my status as a Permanent Resident of the United States - a status that affords me nearly the same rights that a naturalized citizen has (with the exception of the right to vote and Social Security benefits, if you want to point out two of the most important differences) — is "no good," is an attack on my identity.

Never in my life have I been so frustrated. Here was one of your store managers telling me, a long time paying customer of your brands, in front of my boyfriend and everyone else on line, that I can't return a $24.99 bra because my green card "isn't good enough" to prove that I am who I say I am. I was reduced to tears as I stormed out of the store though a chaotic crowd of weekend shoppers. Yes I had caused a scene, and yes, I was utterly embarrassed. My $93 was good enough for Victoria's Secret when I went on one of my nearly once a month shopping sprees at what used to be one of my favorite stores on earth. Yes I can get a non-driver's ID from New York State, but in all my years of living in New York City, in all my years of living in this COUNTRY, I have never had a need for one. NOT ONCE. To get a new form of identification simply so I can enjoy the "privilege" of returning merchandise to one of your stores, is absolutely absurd!

Maybe I'm not good enough to shop at Limited Brands stores. Maybe I should wait until my citizenship track is approved by the INS before I reapply for return privileges at Victoria's Secret. By then I'm sure you will have a fully implemented and operational biometric return clearance system that performs a DNA analysis against a database of career "retail-store ripper-offers." Maybe then, your computer will be smart enough to point out to your sales clerk that I spend hundreds of dollars a year at your stores so maybe they should treat me with a little dignity and respect. Until then, all I can do is fight back. I will protest this return policy by urging all those similar situated to refrain from giving a single hard-earned cent to your company!

Truly yours,

RR

We're willing to chalk most of it up to poor training, but that's just plain rude behavior on the manager's part. Why couldn't Victoria's Secret accept the green card? It's got a bajillion pieces of personal information. Perhaps it's because if you're working at the SoHo Victoria's Secret, you're probably a vapid dipshit.

Rather than exiting in tears, though, RR might have been better served by calling Victoria's Secret corporate right then and there. Maybe HQ would've been able to set this store straight. In any event, Victoria's Secret should write an apology letter, let RR return the bra for a full refund, and maybe throw in a $25 gift card for good measure.

(Photo: AP)

]]>
Consumerist-274673 Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:18:10 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=274673&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Advertising Equals Graffiti ]]> New York City has these special video billboards at the top of subway stops playing silent movies for Lexus, Chanel, and NBC. It's kinda beautiful, and kinda annoying.

The Graffiti Research Lab and the Anti-Advertising Agency did an interesting project back in January where they cut out phrases into stencils and taped them over these ads. The moving light behind the letters illuminated phrases like "Graffiti," "Advertising = Graffiti," piggybacking on the very message-dispensing machine it attacks. Click the picture above to see the movie.

A cool art project and way to reclaim the urban space, if only temporarily. Just don't do it in Boston. — BEN POPKEN

Light Criticism [The Anti-Advertising Agency]

]]>
Consumerist-260421 Mon, 14 May 2007 22:39:23 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=260421&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Go From Couch Potato To Marketing Guinea Pig In One Easy Aerobics Class ]]> We can understand salsarobics, tai-bo, and after enough whippets, even jazzercise, but these marketing themed classes are really something special. Here's Crunch Gym's announcement for the Legally Blonde steps class. Angie never got one of these for her ill-fated Spiderman 3/A Clockwork Orange/spinning class.

Crunch's Broadway Dance Series: Legally Blonde

Mondays, 8:30pm at 13th Street, NYC

Ohmigod You Guys! Blonde ambition turns pink in this superfun dance class based on the new Legally Blonde musical on Broadway. Learn the show's awesome dance choreography, get the chance to win tickets and even meet cast members.

SPECIAL TICKET RATES FROM CRUNCH AND LEGALLY BLONDE!
Visit Ticketmaster.com or call 212-307-4100 and use code "CRNCH."

For more about LEGALLY BLONDE The Musical, go to
www.legallyblondethemusical.com

Note, Angie was cool with these types of classes, as there's a heads up and she can half-appreciate activity the activity half-ironically. — BEN POPKEN

PREVIOUSLY: Why Is Crunch Gym Forcing Spiderman 3 "Marketing Experiences" On Their Spinning Classes?
(Photo: Paul Konik)

]]>
Consumerist-259698 Fri, 11 May 2007 12:32:05 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=259698&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Buy Brand Name Cereal For Only $1.79 At <strike>Grand Central</strike> Northeast RiteAids ]]> For some inexplicable reason, you can get any box of cereal right now for $1.79 at the Rite Aid in Grand Central in Manhattan. These normally run $6-plus. $4-plus.

Plucky weekend editor Carey Greenberg-Berger confirmed this deal by driving over there and emerging with a plunder-trunk-full of breakfast delights: 24 boxes. Only 11 are pictured because he's a nice guy and gave away a bunch before taking the photo.

When asked about the deal, Rite Aid employees had no idea why the cereal was so heavily discounted. There was no visible damage to the boxes and all expiration dates looked kosher.

For non-New Yorkers, take heart in that there's still a deal to be found even in this luxor encrusted playground.

Pictures of a reaaaaallly long receipt, inside...

UPDATE: Ok, so here's the scoop, courtesy of reader Ben P. Wellington. ALL RiteAids on the Northeast have a great deal on cereal. However, it's only one brand of cereal per week. This week was Post brand cereals. For some reason, perhaps out of human kindness, the checkout lady decided to scan one box of honeycombs over and over again, rather than scan 24 individual, various boxes of cereal. You can see what's discounted each week by looking at RiteAid's weekly circular.


http://consumerist.com/assets/resources/2007/02/reallylongreceipt-thumb.jpg

http://consumerist.com/assets/resources/2007/02/2ndreceipt-thumb.jpg

— BEN POPKEN

Quite possibly the deal of the year [This Is What We Do Now] (Thanks to John!)

]]>
Consumerist-240412 Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:49:15 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=240412&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ IDT Energy Continues To Con New Yorkers ]]> Door to door marketers working for IDT Energy are still preying upon New Yorkers, pretending to work for ConEd in an effort to get residents to switch over electrical service to the energy reseller.

Reader Patrick provides the latest dispatch, from the West Village, where the neighborhood was crawling today with IDT salespeople. In typical fashion, the IDT employees maintained that they worked for ConEd and tried to bully residents into showing their bills. According to his report, the IDT workers resisted residents demands that they leave and argued with the super. Patrick called the cops but by the time they arrived, the IDT salespeople had left.

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo and the Public Utilities Commission need to deliver these guys a swift kick in the nuts, stat. Until then, residents beware. Patrick's letter, inside...

If IDT has come to your door, impersonating ConEd, file a complaint with the NY Attorney General's office by calling 212-416-8000.


Patrick writes:

Today a representative of IDT Energy came to my door (we do not allow canvassing in the building), presented herself as a Con Edison employee, (her EXACT words were "I'm with Con Ed"), and tried to convince me that I was entitled to a "reduction" in my energy costs, and literally DEMANDED to see my bill. She kept repeating, completely ignoring my asking for her Con Ed badge, "I NEED TO SEE YOUR BILL".

After I insisted she was not with Con Ed, she said, well, "I'm with IDT", and I promptly asked her to leave the building. She refused, and continued to try and get me to sign over my energy commitment to IDT, pen in hand. After I threatened to call the police, I heard one of her colleagues talking to a tenant upstairs, realizing that there were four young women in the building, all very aggressive, perhaps not even knowing that they were slamming for an energy reseller...

These girls clearly thought they were doing something above board and verbally fought for the right to remain in the building. I demanded again, and when three of the four blocked my access to go back upstairs I then called the police. The girls waited a bit, arguing with the super, and then left. When the police arrived I informed them of the issue.

...Yet another issue of something which may be "technically legal" but which through means of lying and door to door intimidation, ends up hurting consumers and New Yorkers.

— BEN POPKEN

]]>
Consumerist-235223 Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:25:03 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=235223&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Joining Crunch Gym Is Like Joining The Mafia ]]> As Michael Corleone once said, "Just when I thought that I was out they pull me back in."

Jill writes:

"A couple of years ago I joined Crunch Gym in Manhattan. The terms of my membership were that I could cancel if I moved to an area without an accessible Crunch Gym. A year ago I moved upstate and tried to cancel my membership. They asked me to prove I was living upstate, I sent bills in my name which they told me proved nothing. I sent my mortgage document which they again told me wasn't proof. It took 5 months for me to persuade them that I was telling the truth and they billed me for my gym membership the entire time I was negotiating.

I should have tried to reclaim the money but by then I was just glad to be out of my membership and to have severed my relationship with such a sleazy company.

Today 6 months later I received a bill from them for $79.00 it said that they had tried to charge my credit card, but the charge had failed to go through. The charge failed because they tried to charge a credit card that I had cancelled 6 months ago. I called them to find out why they were suddenly charging me. The woman I spoke to admitted the error immediately and promised it would not happen again. Here is my question - is this fraud? If my credit card had not already been cancelled they would just have spontaneously started charging me without notifying me. Did they send this demand hoping I'd be so intimidated that I'd pay rather than go through all the convoluted negotiations necessary to deal with them. Can they randomly charge me, six months after finally agreeing to let me out of my membership? My dealings with them have been so torturous that I suspect their motives.

Jill"

Gyms are notorious at not letting customers out of contract. Don't what it is, perhaps they're just really dedicated to getting you in shape. In any event, It sounds like this Crunch went one step further. Instead of cancelling your contract, they put your account on a six-month "rest" and then tried to start it up again. It could be that their computer system truly made a flub, but as you said, their previous history would suggest otherwise.

Either way, more the reason why it is often advisable to sign up with gyms on a month-to-month basis. The initial membership fee may be a bit higher, often the equivalent to one or two extra months, but if you ever go on vacation, or god forbid, decide to move many miles away, the long term savings could make it worth it.

At this point, it sounds like you're in the clear because all they have is a cancelled credit card. If they call back again, however, it may be more than a mistake and you could have a case for filing a harassment charge, just for bitch slap's sake. — BEN POPKEN

]]>
Consumerist-229311 Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:29:52 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=229311&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Blogger Finds Own Apartment Listed On Craigslist ]]> lookathouse.jpgA stranger called Beth. He knew where she lived in Manhattan, in the upper West side. He knew Beth had a fireplace in her bedroom. Beth's apartment was not for rent, but the caller saw an ad on Craigslist saying it was. Beth did not place this ad.

After investigation, Beth found someone was running a version of the 419, or "advance fee," scam, using Beth's name, address, and photos of her apartment gleaned from her blog...


When Beth asked Beth to see the apartment, Beth said said she was in Fremont, CA and could not show it. When Beth asked if a super or a friend could show it, Beth offered to overnight the keys, after Beth moneygrams $1500. If Beth didn't like it, Beth would send her money back.

When she asked to speak to Beth, Beth said, "I would love to speak with you by phone but I can't because I'm a deaf-mute person and I am teaching in CA for a deaf-mute school."

Beth has no recourse except to ask Craigslist to remove the ad every time it goes up.

She searched far for an agency to take up her complaint and the only one who will is The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), co-sponsored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).

Be careful what you reveal about yourself online. People can aggregate it and masquerade as you. Honesty may be in vogue, but that needn't extend to your personal details, like address, phone number, and pictures of your apartment. — BEN POPKEN

Web of Lies [3 Quarks Daily] (Thanks to Omri!)

]]>
Consumerist-228001 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:02:43 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=228001&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ ThisIsDumb: Commerce Bank's Monitors Face Window ]]> http://www.consumerist.com/assets/resources/2007/01/commerceretard-thumb.jpgCan you spot the problem in this picture? Reader Conformco snagged it and writes:

"A new Commerce Bank opened over the holiday break on 50th & Broadway in Manhattan. When I walked past this afternoon, I noticed that the desks inside feature monitors that face out onto a public plaza.

Now maybe they're just using these for Google Earth or pr0n, but the guy I saw seemed hard at work on a spreadsheet... a spreadsheet that I imagine contained account numbers, names, SSN and the like. But maybe not.

Either way, they're not getting my business until the get some privacy glass installed. Or at least some shrubbery."

Just because all the cool TV shows like 24 have everyone interacting through a series of glass pane offices doesn't mean the rest of us have to, Commerce Bank. — BEN POPKEN

]]>
Consumerist-227150 Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:52:22 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=227150&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ BofA Identity Theft Victim Gets Massive Runaround ]]> Carmela's Bank of America bank account was stolen. Someone was posting fraudulent transactions on her account. When she reported it to BofA, she entered into a colossal fun trap of transfers and incompetent support staff, even after visiting the branch on 107th and Broadway in Manhattan. However, rather than fighting The Man, she should have:

• Opened a new BofA account
• Transferred funds from the old to the new
• Canceled the old BofA account
• Informed the people receiving your checks that someone stole your bank account so can they please rip up the check and wait for a new one
• Written those people new checks
• Gotten on with her life

Instead she fought the law, the law almost won, but she managed to shoot a few deputies. Her letter, inside...


Here is the complaint letter Carmela wrote Bank of America:

"I have been a customer with Bank of America since 2001. I have never had problems with the service before. In fact, I would tell my friends how great the customer service is. The ATMs are accessible everywhere. I even referred my mother. A good example of Bank of America's customer service is that I received a phone call when I changed my address to New York. (I was currently living in St. Louis.)

But, now, I have to take back my words. I have never experienced such incompetency like I did yesterday, Jan. 3, 2007. I experienced less than standard service although Bank of America prides itself on "higher standards." I usually check my bank accounts every day. Yesterday afternoon, I noticed 2 fraudulent charges on my checking account although I still had my debit card in my possession. (I only use my ATM card for withdrawing/depositing money.) I called customer service, and the representative referred me to the claims department. It seems the thief had my routing number and account number. The thief was making purchases electronically. The claims rep gave me a claim number for one transaction so I could receive my money back. The rep told me that I had to wait for the 2nd transaction to post on my account. (It was still pending.) Once it posts, then I could make a claim. But, I could not close my account because I had to wait for this 2nd transaction to post. So, I asked for my account to be frozen, and the rep said that option was not the best. I asked, "What if this person continues making charges?" Then, the rep said that the claims department could take further action on all charges. I was displeased with this answer, and after talking with my mother, I went to a banking center to speak to someone face-to-face. I went to the 107th and Broadway banking center in Manhattan, and none of the representatives knew what action to take. They told me to call Customer Service. It is ridiculous that so many Bank of America employees do not know what action to take when identity fraud/fraudulent charges occur. Is this crime not a priority for Bank of America? Are these employees untrained, or is there no existing training protocol?

Again, I talked to customer service, and again, I was transferred to the Claims Department. This gentleman told me to open another account and to transfer my money. I asked him about the checks I had written to pay for my rent and other such bills. He suggested that I leave the correct amount in the former account for the checks. After about an hour, I left the bank.

Later that night, I was still displeased because currently, nothing is stopping this thief from taking more money from me. My checks could bounce. Does Bank of America prefer to go through claims to resolve the issue? I would think that prevention is the best strategy for both of us. For the third time, I called Customer service around 7PM. I specifically asked to freeze my account. The Customer service rep said that only Claims can freeze my account. Once I was transferred to Claims, this rep told me that only Customer Service could freeze my account. When I spoke to the 2nd Customer service rep, this woman said that she could not do it although I had told her I was in a transfer loop with these departments. She told me that she would put a stop payment on the 2 vendors that is associated with the fraudulent transactions. She told me that this would prevent any additional charges from them.

I called again around 10PM because I felt that Bank of America was not doing anything to protect me. This Customer Service representative said that the only way to freeze my account is to go to an actual banking center. At this point, I was highly irritated. Not only did I have to put up with such incompetency, I have to deal with other vendors and their long waiting times as well. I ask this gentleman, "What am I suppose to do? If I wait for this one transaction to post, what makes you think that another transaction will not occur? Then, I'll have to wait for that transaction to post." He was no help.

So, I prayed that by midnight the 2nd transaction would have posted, and I could make a claim and close the account. But by 12:15AM, it still did not post. I decided to go to bed. I woke up at 5:30 AM to see if it posted, and I would still have free nights on my cellphone before I ran into my anytime minutes. (Because of all the vendors/institutions I had to call yesterday, I had gone over my monthly plan.) And to my surprise, 2 more fraudulent charges showed up in my pending transactions, and I was charged $28 for the stop payment. The lady representative did not tell me that this action would cost me money especially since I thought it was the only preventative option available. It is outrageous that I am being charged for preventing fraudulent charges on my own account. At this point, what exactly does Bank of America do to protect me as a customer? I was livid, but Customer Service opens at 7AM. I called Customer Service for the 5th time promptly at 7AM.

Bank of America is lucky that I spoke to 2 employees who resolved my problem because if this situation was not resolved this time, I was going to go to the banking center and close all of my accounts (2 checkings, 1 savings, and 2 credit cards). The Customer Service rep was able to put a "balance hold" on my account. Is this term unknown to other Customer Service representatives? Do they not know that this action is the same thing as freezing an account? I was able to make a 2nd claim for the transaction that I was waiting for earlier. Ron Duncan (by this time, I realized that I should be taking names) credited my account for the stop payment fee. He also tried stopping the payments for the 2 new pending transactions. He told me that it would not work 100%, but since I was able to hold my balance, I was satisfied. He did apologize for all of my inconveniences which is the first apology I have heard.

As I am writing this e-mail, I am getting angry and wondering why I should still utilize Bank of America. I will definitely not refer people anymore. I will not be opening any new accounts with Bank of America. During this whole ordeal, I did not feel that my interests were a priority to the bank. As a victim, I, myself, could not do anything to stop this crime, and I had to completely depend on Bank of America who had failed me. I would greatly appreciate a response to this e-mail, and I hope changes will be made."

PS Bank of America customer service sucks. Don't bank there. — BEN POPKEN

]]>
Consumerist-227139 Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:43:56 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=227139&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The $55 Mac And Cheese Guy Speaks ]]> The $55 mac and cheese (and truffle) guy has some choice words for you (the friend was platonic, he had a good time, is not a douche, etc), inside...

Above is what his dinner may have looked like. Except, you know, smaller. — BEN POPKEN


Our tipster Max passes on words about his publicity shy friend. Shining points of clarification, if you will.

"Besides the truffle incident, he says that he actually had a nice meal and enjoyed the free wine.

My roommate was out eating with a platonic female friend who suggested it. My roommate is no stranger to expensive restaurants, is a New York native, and did not have trouble paying the bill, but besides this fact he just ultimately deemed $55 mac and cheese ridiculous. He is not a douche and he is not stupid.

In fact, he didn't even get to eat any of it because the portion was too small. He ordered it based on his friend's suggestion, as in a previous meal her friend had ordered it and loved it.

He assumed mac and cheese was mac and cheese and was not looking at the menu, and did not know that it was going to have truffles on it. He had not had truffles before and when they shaved them onto the dish, he "thought it was cheese at first but then was pretty sure it was truffles." He didn't say anything because he's not a confrontational guy, and offered the entire plate to his guest because the portion was so small. But even still,
he did not expect it to be $55.

All in all, it was more a humorous experience for him than an unpleasant one, and he would like to communicate to everyone that it pays to check prices on what you order, even if you can ultimately afford it."

Previously:
UPDATE: The $55 Mac And Cheese: The Menu Said 'Truffles'
The $55 Mac And Cheese

]]>
Consumerist-220605 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:13:26 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=220605&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ UPDATE: The $55 Mac And Cheese: The Menu Said 'Truffles' ]]> withfreshtruffles.jpgUPDATE: The $55 Mac And Cheese Guy Speaks

Here's a snip from the menu of the Waverly Inn, which charged a reader's friend $55 for a bowl of mac and cheese. Fresh shaved truffles are clearly included in the mac and cheese.

So Max's friend is a bit silly for not reading . However, that doesn't excuse a $55 bowl of macaroni and cheese.

To its credit, the Waverly gave the couple several free glasses of vino. The price probably works out in the end, considering the waiter came by and sneezed caviar in their wine. — BEN POPKEN

Full menu reprinted, inside...


Click to enlarge.

http://www.consumerist.com/assets/resources/2006/12/menuofwaverly-thumb.jpg

The Waverly Inn is the creation of Graydon Carter, Vanity Fair editor and inventor of Spy Magazine. Which means this whole affair is probably some kind of a satirical sendup.

Menu courtesy of Eater.

This post originally tried to make a connection between the price of the truffle fries and the price of the mac and cheese. However, a reader has informed us we know nothing about making truffle fries and so we have retracted this assertion. Our apologies to the truffle union.

]]>
Consumerist-220500 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:30:00 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=220500&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The $55 Mac And Cheese ]]> UPDATE: The $55 Mac And Cheese Guy Speaks
UPDATE: The Menu Said 'Truffles'

This guy goes to the Waverly Inn and orders a mac and cheese, the night's special, as an appetizer. It's the kind of place where there's no prices on the menus. When the mac comes, a waiter slides over and grates something on it. The guy assumes it's cheese, eats his dinner and gets his bill. His eyes explode.

The mac and cheese is fifty-five dollars.

Turns out the stuff the waiter grated on wasn't cheese. It was a fresh truffle. Special, indeed.

Watch out at the restaurant. Just because they put the fancy on doesn't mean they're above sneaking charges into your meal. Our reader's letter, inside...

— BEN POPKEN


Max writes:

"Hey Consumerist! Funny night for both me and my roommate. Not only did the girl I am seeing not put out, but my roommate has a problem with his date as well. They had decided to go to dinner at a restaurant she liked in the west village, and they ordered the usual: Salad, tuna tar-tar, chicken pot pie, and creamed spinach. My roommate, a comfort food fan (guess which of the previously mentioned items was his), noticed that the special for the evening was macaroni and cheese. He was in the mood, so he ordered it as an appetizer. The menu had no listed prices.

They brought out the macaroni on a small plate, in a quantity he describes as "not even enough to be considered an appetizer." A waiter came over and grated something over the top, which was assumed to be cheese, and that was that. Then the bill came. The Salad? $10. The pot pie? $18. The look on my roommate's face as he tells me he just dropped $55 on Mac and Cheese? Priceless.

It turns out that the stuff the waiter had grated over the dish was not a cheese but a fresh truffle, and no one had thought to mention anything until the bill came. He spoke to the owner, who gave him "A few free glasses of wine for the trouble," but the point he makes is that there's no reason a respectable restaurant with average dinner prices should sneak in a $55 macaroni order. Naughty naughty!"

Full receipt:

55macmacmac.jpg

]]>
Consumerist-220379 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:08:14 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=220379&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ NYC RFID Subway Turnstiles Spread ]]> http://www.consumerist.com/assets/resources/2006/11/morerfidsubway-thumb.jpg

New RFID turnstiles mean Citibank customers with enabled cards or credit wands need never fumble for a Metrocard again.

Reader C-side spotted this one at at the Broadway/Lafayette subway station in Manhattan.

Eventually, RFID will spread to ever every transaction point. They're already at McDonald's. Forward-thinking churches will use RFID collection plates.

Good thing the security of broadcasting one's credit card information via transponder is completely worked out... — BEN POPKEN

Another picture, inside.

http://www.consumerist.com/assets/resources/2006/11/subrfid2-thumb.jpg

]]>
Consumerist-214531 Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:19:06 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=214531&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Big Titty Mannequins ]]> Mannequins are disturbing enough, but do we really need to give them size D breasts?

Spotted 'em in the window of a Manhattan t-shirt shop last night. It was cold. — BEN POPKEN

]]>
Consumerist-213004 Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:43:17 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=213004&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Random Halloween Shit ]]> • Reader Max says it's nigh impossible to buy candy corn in Manhattan.
• FTC recall of Flammable 'Creepy Cape' Costumes from Family Dollar. You can identify them by their plastic, please burn me look, and a sticker on the collar that says, "FLAME RETARDANT PVC."
• If you're stuck in a crush at the Halloween parade, a good way to escape is to elbow your way to the front and scooch under the police barrier. When the cop stops you and says, "Where do you think you're going?" Exclaim, "We need to get out of here, it's a medical emergency." This really happened to us just a few hours ago. And dude in the suit who refused to move his arm, saying, "Hey man, I don't know you," nearly preventing our girlfriend from getting through, if we ever see you again, we're punching your lights out.

]]>
Consumerist-211515 Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:13:28 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=211515&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Time Warner Won't Fix Connection Broken For Years ]]> The horror of Time Warner Cable NYC is legion, a textbook example of monopolies abusing consumers customers.

The latest chapter in the TWC grimoire comes courtesy of Sedef. His connection is sub-par and always crashes. A rotating crew of TWC give him different answers each time they show up. Sometimes, a neighbor is siphoning his signal. Sometimes, his connection is "too high" and needs "an amplifier."

Sedef says he's tried contacting supervisors to see about getting a half price discount on his service, seeing as he's only getting half service. He's "never heard back" from them after they said they would look into it.

While we sympathise with Sedef's plight, you can't stop there. If they don't call you back, call them back. Or, check out this handy list of Every Phone Number For TWC Level 3 Tech Support. And/or call the office of James D. Fellhauer, chief of customer care, at 1-202-328-4017, after reading our guidelines on obtaining executive customer service.

Sedef's letter, inside.


Sedef writes:

"I own a duplex one-bedroom co-op in midtown Manhattan. For the past several years, I've struggled to get a dedicated line for my broadband cable programming and Internet connection - a service for which I paid more than $100/month. Repeatedly, my cable programming would go down for no apparent reason, or alternatively (and more frequently), my Internet connection would inexplicably crash. In each instance, I would have to schedule a cable appointment and go through the requisite 1-2 appointments where cable guys literally ducked my appointment and claimed I wasn't home, and finally showed up to fix the problem.

Early on, cable technicians would tell me my problem was that my line had a splitter located down the hall from my ground floor apartment, and I was getting half the signal broadcast to my unit, with the other half going to a unit around the corner (not sure what that owner was paying for his/her service). One admirably brave technician actually told me it was inadequate service and that my signal was unacceptably low; he said the cable company should fix this for me (I've since learned that Time-Warner contracts out cable technicians and this honest technician has likely been rotated off their list of technicians).

Not surprisingly, I was able to diagnose my own problem with all the future technicians who visited my apartment to "repair" my continually crashing broadband connection. Besides being either typically condescending in attitude, or unhelpful in ideas for long-term resolution for my problem, little changed. One technician actually told me that my signal was too "high", laughably enough, and that it would need an "amplifier" as a solution. Sounded like a solution to an old-school audio (or even analog) problem, but of course, I never heard back from him afterwards.

At one point, I suggested to one of the many "supervisors" I was put in contact with at Time-Warner that perhaps they should credit my account for half the amount I was paying since I was receiving only half the quality/quantity of their advertised service. This suggestion was actually met with real consideration, and I was informed that they would look into this. Never heard back. Since then, I'm beginning to think that they actually pull this stunt/scam with a lot of tenants in buildings which are older and which haven't had the same rapid installation of high-speed services as the newer buildings. Regardless, I felt powerless as a consumer to fix the problem, as my co-op board has a special relationship with Time-Warner so they served as the exclusive provider of cable in our building (not to mention, they may have been the only game in town based on my particular neighborhood).

Somehow I don't think I'm the only consumer in NYC having this problem. I would love to give it more visibility in the hopes that we shame Time-Warner into doing the right thing."

]]>
Consumerist-210307 Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:18:49 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=210307&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pro-Walmart Art Parade A Rousing Success ]]> By all accounts, it appears Bob Snead's up with Walmart parade went off very well last Saturday.

Snead says he developed the idea of a pro-Walmart rally after seeing various ninnies and nincompoops rail against the big box retailer, most especially, Democrats prepping the muck for racking in the upcoming elections. He writes:

"The Democrats taking this hardline against Wal-Mart should really teach a class called "How to Lose an Election 102." In order for most American's to support an anti-Wal-Mart platform, they must abandon the ideals of our Laissez-faire capitalist system. Wal-Mart should be allowed to do whatever it wants in our system, less becoming a Monopoly... and it's been careful not to fall into that category. Governmental intervention into the healthcare or wages Wal-Mart gives its employees would reflect socialist values. As we've learned from our non-existent nationalized healthcare system, Americans are definitely not socialist. And to most Americans, a Socialist is just a step away from a Communist, and Communists are certainly un-American. If the genius that is George W. Bush can get elected and then re-elected, then we certainly won't be having commies running our government anytime soon. God Bless America, God Bless Wal-Mart."

Edelman, hire this man.

]]>
Consumerist-200924 Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:03:39 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=200924&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Be A Walmart Greeter This Saturday ]]> Bob Snead will give you a Walmart vest and Tshirt if you walk with him during the Deitch Projects Art Parade this Saturday.

Beginning at 4pm on West Broadway in NYC, "I Love Wal-Mart and Wal-Mart loves Me" will consist of a very militant group of around 75 volunteer protesters dressed as Wal-Mart greeters professing their love for Wal-Mart, with chants like "I heart Wal-Mart" or "Sam's Choice is my Choice". It will also include several volunteers in large reproduction "Sam's Choice" product costumes like Soda, Ketchup, Peanut Butter, and Bread."

This takes place in a parade filled with a bunch of other people dressed and acting like freakydoodles, so it won't have as much impact if it took place say, on Sunday, or, inside a Walmart.

(Thanks to C-side!)

]]>
Consumerist-198705 Wed, 06 Sep 2006 05:27:48 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=198705&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Consumer Blasts Verizon With Car Windows ]]> Another fine example of people using their cars as anti-corporate billboards. What really makes this one, however, is what the owner decided to park his car in front of.

No one does irony and rage, and SUVs better than NYC, baby.

(Thanks to Chris!)

UPDATE: The photo inside should make things more clear for those of you wondering what the heck we're talking about with this whole crazy context thing.

]]>
Consumerist-196711 Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:12:27 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=196711&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Improv Everywhere Invades Home Depot ]]>

Softcore agit prop group Improv Everywhere sent 255 people to Home Depot in Manhattan to shop very slowly for five minutes.

Worth a chin scratch and a chuckle but the real gold lies in the employee reactions, after the jump.

The orange vests brand of actually improved performance is much more entertaining.

]]>
Consumerist-196630 Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:18:25 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=196630&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Whorehouse Gives Great Customer Service ]]> Sometimes stories of wonderful care for the customer shows up in the oddest places, like a massage parlor on the Lower East Side.

"I'm sure I contributed to the spread of illegal human trafficking," a reader writes. " So yeah, there was a bit of guilt, not to mention I'm married. And while this wasn't my first time doing this, it was my first time going to a house of ill repute and it's something in general that I hadn't done in years. I thought my life was different nowadays.

I'll blame it on the heat."

There's a happy ending, inside...


This is a story I would love to submit to the Times for it's Metro Diary, but somehow I think they'd pass. It's a story of exemplary customer service, so maybe it's good for Consumerist...

...When I walk in, I see I've arrived during a slow period. An elderly woman is hunched over a stove, poking her tongs at roasting spare ribs. Another elderly woman is serving a batch of those ribs to three young women sitting around a counter. All the women were eating them with little plastic gloves on their hands.

As I'm guided to a bedroom through the kitchen, they make a joke, giggle, and ask if I want some spare ribs. I say yes, as I love the roasted ribs I get at many of the Chinese joints in Chinatown. Ha ha ha.

The girl and I tussle for an hour, I shower, and as I'm ready to leave, Mama-San (I swear!) tells me to sit. She has put aside a plate of ribs for me. I have to eat them. It's like my own grandmother is there. They are amazing, these delicately spiced, gingery, scallion-y, ribs, with flavor all the way through. You can't find these at any of the restaurants I've been to, Korean or Chinese. She handed me the box with the plastic gloves, and I put them on. As I eat, I begin to sweat, and the woman I was just with (again, I swear) wipes the sweat from my brow. She stands over me, attending to me: "Do I need water?": "Do I want rice?"; and "Is it good?"

I left feeling the guilt and shame that comes from acting out in ways that are not healthy to the rest of my life, but full of laughter at the homeyness of it all.

And yes, I am going to go back."

]]>
Consumerist-192631 Mon, 07 Aug 2006 18:32:40 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=192631&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Other Music Through the Exploding Looking Glass ]]> If you've never been to Other Music in New York you may not appreciate this as much but OM is an awesome lil music store at East 4th and Lafayette. Contrary to what this video might have you believe, the people are actually super friendly and helpful. There is a certain elitist air but that's because they know their shit and they know they know it.

After all, these guys are willing to give Stephen Malkmus a face transplant.

(Thanks to Karl Hungus!)

]]>
Consumerist-175793 Tue, 23 May 2006 16:52:07 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=175793&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Turning the Tables on the Hudson ]]> hudson.jpgRobert Norton is staying at the Hudson Hotel here in New York and his feet are cold:

Staying in this hell hole and have full sympathies with Jason Calcanis. He complained about the heating here and got a few nights refund.

Well I have been here since Sat - arrived to a freezing room, was told heating didn't work in summer months and have not been able to sleep for last two nights because my switched off air conditioning unit keeps waking me up with the sounds of clanging irons.

All I can say is Ian Schrager - once a nightclub promoter always a nightclub promoter.

Once you leave the swanky lobby area, this must be the worst hotel I have ever stayed at in NY.

P.S. also the night manager Chris Vargess doesn't even say sorry (aaaahhhhhhhh!)

Sorry for what, we wonder, but not enough to find out for ourselves.

The Hudson Hotel receives a 9.5 rating on CitySearch, and even garnered a 2001 award for Best Bargain Hotel. The savings apparently comes from, among the lack of other amenities, skinflint heating. However, Calacanis reports paying $450 a night. At those rates, you can buy a sweater.

]]>
Consumerist-175665 Tue, 23 May 2006 11:40:19 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=175665&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apple Store Opening Revealed ]]> Here's everything we missed by staying home from the Apple Store opening on Friday.

OMG, Amy Pohler, Rachel Dratch, David Pogue and Steve Jobs! And Mac stuff. And glass. And rain. And throngs of people. And did you see the glass? It's a slow moving liquid, just like the line to get in.

We enjoy the young lad saying he's been a Mac fan since he was "a baby. My dad was an early adopter." Was that of Appleware... or at the orphanage? Don't worry, the Mac family of computer products and personable software suite are all the family you'll ever need.

And here's a 360 degree QTVR panorama of the store at night.

Animal takes a bite out of the opening, including a special secret press card they swiped which got them to the head of the line. Ha ha, suckers!

]]>
Consumerist-175361 Mon, 22 May 2006 11:06:02 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=175361&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Naked Cube Store ]]> Skads of rats.

Apple's cube is being revealed tomorrow. We were going to station a reporter inside and get awesome liveblogging coverage of all the subterranean delights (as the cube is merely the entranceway to an underground Apple lair).

Then some members of the press got a sneak peak today and shouted it out to Gothamist. We knew we should've kept that lil card snugged inside the brim of our fedora.

There's more pix here

The store will be open 265/24/7 and will provide the blueprint for future Apple meccas, the next of which is slated for Freehold, NJ, aka, the capital of cool.

UPDATE: In case there's any confusion, we are not liveblogging the store opening. It's already been scooped. Go turn on your TV, we're sure it's there somewhere.

]]>
Consumerist-174860 Thu, 18 May 2006 20:40:19 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=174860&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apple Cube Naked On Friday, We're There ]]>

On Friday, Apple will unveil a giant cube in front of FAO Schwartz and The Consumerist will be there to liveblog it (probably).

A shrine of glass, the heavily anticipated new Mac store has been encased with as much secrecy as it has large black panels, but all will be revealed in 03 days, 01 hours, 53 minutes and 03 seconds, as of this posting. We're told so by the Apple store cube site, hosting a countdown to the grand opening.

We may have live-blogging coverage of it if as long as the Blackberry of our embedded field reporter, Tim Nudd, editor of Adfreak, is working. We're not promising, but we're really really going to try.

He may win great prizes, or even a commemorative t-shirt. Stay tuned.

]]>
Consumerist-174202 Tue, 16 May 2006 17:14:56 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=174202&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apartment 'Painted' With 100 Gallons ]]> ratdrain.jpgRent-stabilized apartments in New York are the bane of their landlords, gnashing their teeth like the rats they unleash to drive out unwanted tenants.

Renters at 706 Riverside Drive just won a lengthy legal battle against Pinnacle who wanted to charge new renters $2000 in building where most of the people paid $600. To justify the increase, Pinnacle claimed thousands of dollars of improvements. Improvements that were never made. In perusing the hundreds of documents the housing company submitted, tenants found:

  • $1,029 for 100 gallons of latex paint and $454 for 45 gallons of ceramic adhesive. Enough paint and adhesive for an entire building.
  • $336 for five toilet flushometers. The apartment has only two bathrooms, and the existing flushometers showed no signs of recent replacement.
  • $169 for 240 light bulbs - 80 per apartment.

Under state law, a landlord can raise an apartments rent by one-fortieth of the improvement cost.

"Phony Repairs Add to Abuse" [NY Daily News]

]]>
Consumerist-173798 Mon, 15 May 2006 13:18:53 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=173798&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Peeping Tom on 5th Ave Shop Windows ]]> As promised, the results of our Tuesday stroll down 5th avenue, peeking inside all the windows and seeing what we could see. Not all stores are represented in this set; frankly, we found many of the displays tired and staid. Here's a few things that caught our eye, in a magic Flickr gallery.

Click on a photo to start the slideshow. If the photos disappear, hit refresh or go backwards. (sorry, code it buggy)


The strongest showing was by Saks Fifth Avenue who definitely lead the pack in style and innovation. Their windows are in a cinematic aspect ratio and they exploit their bold-face headline window space with grace and aplomb. The result has a breath of mothball and a deprecating cuteness but at least it tells a bit of a story. A story of, apparently, cupcakes and cleaning solution, but a story nonetheless.

]]>
Consumerist-173511 Fri, 12 May 2006 16:20:06 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=173511&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Everything Must Go ]]> We thought there was something a little perfect about this picture we took on Tuesday of a shopkeep lording over his bronze lions and 50% off all NY souvenirs.

]]>
Consumerist-173303 Thu, 11 May 2006 22:57:14 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=173303&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Abercrombie & Fitch Catalogue Come to Life ]]> abercromb.jpgWe took a stroll down 5th avenue in NYC this afternoon and saw many delightful and several inane things through the shop windowss (a Flickr gallery is forthcoming). But first, we just had to show you this pic we snagged through the open door at Abercrombie & Fitch.

Yowza!

The boys from the catalogue are real, they're placed at the door to draw patrons in, and they have girlfriends, also from the catalogue. Are either of these two available for purchase? God willing.

As we stood taking a picture, an old lady walked by and looked in. "Disgusting!" she said, "Absolutely disgusting!"

After the jump, a large, exploitative, shot of mounds of rippling male flesh.

Holy man meat.

abercrom2.jpg

Oh, to be a fly on the wall during the casting session.

]]>
Consumerist-172960 Wed, 10 May 2006 19:12:25 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=172960&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Saks' Dumpster-Dived Window Displays ]]> Saks has a new window display up on 5th Avenue until this Thursday.

Animal blog reports that a Saks rep said, "we wanted to take ordinary things and make them look high end."

A lofty goal, indeed. Instead of reaching it, however, they've managed to make the dress look like a lazy lamp shade and the bottles of cleaning solution, confused. The only thing that looks good are the light tubes, which, presumably, are not for sale.

Gawker had a few words to say about these as well.

]]>
Consumerist-172688 Wed, 10 May 2006 00:21:26 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=172688&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Smell of Discount Designer Duds Like Sweet Puke ]]> The prospect of crazy fashion deals is usually considered "sick" as in "sweet" as in "bad like early Michael Jackson good."

However, for one skinny, blond publishing industry worker, a past shopping trauma causes a tickle in her olfactories. Now every Century 21 bag she encounters smells like vomit.

Aside: you'll have to forgive us and supply your own imagination caps for, try as we might, we failed to find the perfect picture to illustrate this post's "concept."

In creating her Pavlovian puke connection, she sacrificed reduced-priced cashmere and last season's Pucci for a misplaced piece of pride. Dignity is for sale in Manhattan, but you have to pay the right price. And usually the transaction doesn't take place in the back of a taxi.

Usually.

"Things That Make Me Nauseous: Century 21" [via Gawker]

]]>
Consumerist-171678 Thu, 04 May 2006 17:16:44 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=171678&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Best Buy Pranked By Blue Shirt Horde ]]> 80 members of the Improv Everywhere troupe dressed in blue polos and khakis and pranked the Best Buy store in Manhattan.

They stood around, answered customer's questions and acted nonchalant, until the store caught wise, started screaming "Thomas Crowne affair!" and the cops showed up.

More crimes against humanity, after the jump...

Here's "Agent Simmons" (photo: far left), report:

"I was lingering near the audio equipment at one point when a middle-aged couple asked me if I knew the price of some speakers. I looked for a price tag and then read $99.99 labeled on the shelf by the product. I said "$99.99?" Unsure. And they pointed out, "No. That is the price of the wireless speakers". "Oh", I said "Maybe it's been labeled wrong." The man said, "Well, do you work here?" I said, "No," but I thought they looked like good speakers. They looked puzzled.

Just then an actual Best Buy floor clerk approached me:

Employee: "You can't talk to my customers".
Simmons: "I'm just having a friendly conversation with these people"
Employee: "But you don't work here."
Simmons: "It's a free country I feel I can speak with anybody I choose."
Employee: "You're playing some games."
Simmons: "I'm just here to shop with my wife."
Employee: "Yeah, you and your 50 friends?"
Simmons: "I don't know anybody else here."
Employee: "Yeah, you're instigating (sic) our shirts."

I told him, "I'm only wearing what I wore this morning," and walked away.

A little while later, an older woman with a handful of products walked past me at one point muttering to herself, "Everyone in this goddamned store is wearing a blue shirt and nobody knows a thing!"

Read more: "Mission: Best Buy." See more: Flickr set. [via Gizmodo]

]]>
Consumerist-170751 Mon, 01 May 2006 15:06:36 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=170751&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The $60,000 iPod Tekserve Ad ]]> Normally, unless we were feeling really lazy, we wouldn't post two ads right after one another but we just got this hot ad sent to us and we wanted to scoop it to you quick-styles.

The PR flak who sent us this says that over sixty-thousand dollars worth of iPods were used to achieve this Rube Goldbergian domino effect.

The ad is for Tekserve, a large, independent Apple specialized store in New York City. That's iTopia in the background, their store-within-a-store dedicated to iPods and iPod accessories.

Wonder if any of the screens cracked in making this?

]]>
Consumerist-169851 Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:50:23 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=169851&view=rss&microfeed=true