"For nouns, there are two simple tables (excuse the ASCII in an image):
[www.freeimagehosting.net]
There's only one exception to these tables: When an irregular plural contains different types of the same thing, treat it as a regular plural."
"@Kishi: Just because a "false positive of piracy" rate of 5% is better than 20% does not mean it's better.
[arstechnica.com]
The Red Ring of Death, brought to you by tthe same company that gave you the Blue Screen of Death, and BOX-banning, by the same company that gave the world Windoze Disingenuine Disadvantage.
Thieves don't trust anyone, that's why Microshaft doesn't trust its customers."
"@Megalomania: Windoze Genuine Disadvantage strikes out again.
For anyone who didn't "mod" their eXlaxBOX and bought it with a credit card, I would suggest a chargeback."
"How many of these pricks will send out a notice, then say, "Spending more than what's in your account is opting in!" then put you on it automatically?"
P_Smith commented on Turn Your Perfectly Normal Jeans Into Stirrup Pants
http://consumerist.com/5408657/P_Smith commented on Apostrophe.me Ends Your Apostrophe Ponderings
http://lifehacker.com/5403604/P_Smith commented on Apostrophe.me Ends Your Apostrophe Ponderings
http://lifehacker.com/5403604/P_Smith commented on Microsoft Says There Is No Recourse For Gamers Whose Consoles Were Banned
http://consumerist.com/5403510/P_Smith commented on Middle Class Shoplifting To Keep Up Appearances
http://consumerist.com/5403541/P_Smith commented on Microsoft Says There Is No Recourse For Gamers Whose Consoles Were Banned
http://consumerist.com/5403510/P_Smith commented on Microsoft Says There Is No Recourse For Gamers Whose Consoles Were Banned
http://consumerist.com/5403510/P_Smith commented on Starting July 1, 2010 Overdraft Fees Will Require Consumer Consent
http://consumerist.com/5403315/P_Smith commented on Before and After: The Tiny Study
http://lifehacker.com/5401510/P_Smith commented on Staples Wants To Know If They're Freaking You Out With Their All-Knowing Emails
http://consumerist.com/5401713/next »