<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Consumerist]]></title>
		
		<link>http://consumerist.com</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Shoppers Bite Back.]]></description>
				    			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Social Network Games: Fake Mobsters, Real Racket [Facebook] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/Scamville_logo.gif" height="158" width="158" />You might enjoy raking in money as a fake mobster in Mafia Wars, or collecting cotton subsidies in FarmVille, but TechCrunch's Michael Arrington argues that the real racket in virtual games is for the companies that run them, and for the social networking sites that host them.</p> <p>Is it? Maybe. All of these games can be played without spending any real money, and without signing up for shady offers to receive more in-game currency. But the extra loot can make the game much more fun.</p> <p>The offers are similar to ones we've featured here before&mdash;from innocent things you might sign up for anyway like a Netflix subscription, to <a href="http://consumerist.com/5239930/online-iq-test-is-really-a-stupid-mobile-phone-download-scam">scammy quizzes</a> and <a href="http://consumerist.com/5398309/seattle-coffee-direct-decides-you-need-40-worth-of-coffee-per-day">misleading subscriptions</a>. </p> <p>Zynga, one of the leaders in social networking games, not-so-coincidentally announced a few days after the controversial original post that they will <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/02/zynga-takes-steps-to-remove-scams-from-games/">no longer serve ad or reward offers that ask for users' mobile phone numbers</a>. </p> <p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/31/scamville-the-social-gaming-ecosystem-of-hell/">Scamville: The Social Gaming Ecosystem Of Hell</a> [TechCrunch]<br /> <a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1935698,00.html">Are You Getting Scammed by Facebook Games?</a> [Time]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399264/social-network-games-fake-mobsters-real-racket]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399264</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Facebook ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Games ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Myspace ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ scamville ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Techcrunch ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Web Games ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Zynga ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:00:44 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399264&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Health Care Reform Bill Passes House [Health Insurance] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/4053911941_f0772df223_m.jpg" height="119" width="158" />The House version of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #healthcarereform" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #healthcarereform" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/healthcarereform/">health care reform</a> bill passed the House on Saturday night. Now it needs to be merged with some sort fo Senate version of the bill and signed by the President to become law. So how does this reform bill actually affect consumers?</p> <p><ul> <li><strong>Insurance mandate:</strong> Uninsured Americans will pay a penalty; low-income people exempt. House bill charges a penalty of 2.5% of adjusted gross income: that's $500 on $20,000, for example.</li></p> <li><strong>Employer coverage:</strong>All employers with a payroll above $500,000 must help pay for some kind of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #healthinsurance" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #healthinsurance" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/healthinsurance/">health insurance</a> for their employees, or pay a tax. The Senate Finance Committee version of the bill does not have this requirement.</li> <li><strong>Insurance exchange</strong> - Allows people who are not covered to buy health insurance in nation- or state-wide markets. Available to employees of small businesses, and others not eligible for coverage.</li> <li><strong>Public plan </strong>- Would create a new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #federalgovernment" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #federalgovernment" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/federalgovernment/">federal government</a>-run insurance plan with its own physician and hospital rates, separate from those negotiated by Medicare. Senate Finance Committee instead offers nonprofit insurance cooperatives in each state.</li> <li><strong>Subsidies </strong>- Households earning up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level would be eligible for subsidies of health insurance premiums when they buy insurance through the exchange.</li> <li><strong>Small business subsidies </strong>- Tax credits for small employers that provide <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #healthcare" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #healthcare" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/healthcare/">health care</a> coverage for employees.</li> <li><strong>Coverage</strong> - House and Senate Health Committee versions require plans to pay for 70% of all health care spending that the plan covers; Senate Finance Committee version requires 65%. Insurers cannot deny coverage because of pre-existing conditions, and premiums may not vary according to age on the individual insurance market as widely as they do now. People receiving federal subsidies for insurance may not enroll in a plan that includes coverage of abortions. </li> <li><strong>Medicaid </strong>- Households with incomes up to 150% of the federal poverty level would now be eligible for Medicaid. Senate Finance Committee would expand to 133% of the federal poverty level, starting in 2014.</li> <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/health/policy/08health.html?scp=2&sq=health%20care%20reform%20proposals&st=cse">Sweeping Health Care Plan Passes House</a> [NY Times]</p> <p><strong>RELATED:</strong><br /> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5367930/how-would-health-care-reform-affect-you">How Would Health Care Reform Affect You?</a></p> <p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jreed/4053911941/">j.reed</a>)</p> </ul> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399893/health-care-reform-bill-passes-house]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399893</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Health Insurance ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Congress ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Federal Government ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Health Care ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ health care reform ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Laws ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:00:59 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399893&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Verizon Wireless Relegates iPhone To Island Of Misfit Toys [3G] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/misfit_iphone.jpg" height="194" width="340">As a whimsical follow-up to <a href="http://consumerist.com/5396462/att-sues-verizon-over-theres-a-map-for-that-ads">AT&T's lawsuit</a> concerning their "There's a map for that" ads, Verizon Wireless released their Christmas-themed set of AT&T/iPhone bashing ads today. They're harsh, but also pretty funny.</p> <p>Poor iPhone. Or, smartphone-like device that resembles an iPhone. According to Verizon, its 3G coverage means that it has no place in this world except the island of misfit toys.</p> <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4JgrBtn8XdU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4JgrBtn8XdU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p> <p>Other commercials declare that AT&T users will experience a blue Christmas, and that only the naughty will receive AT&T phones as holiday gifts. Ha ha! Sigh.</p> <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5399850/verizon-wireless-launches-three-more-anti+att-3g-network-commercials">Verizon Wireless Launches Three More Anti-AT&T 3G Network Commercials</a> [Gizmodo]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399878/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399878</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ 3G ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ At&t ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ At&t Wireless ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Christmas ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Commercials ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Holidays ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ iPhone ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Smartphones ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Toys ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Verizon ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Verizon Wireless ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:00:51 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399878&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Dreamie: It's Like A Snuggie That You Sleep In [New And Exciting Products] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/zzzzz.jpg" height="126" width="158">I often tell myself, "Self, I love to travel, but I hate forcing myself to sleep in places that don't have satin sheets." That's where the Dreamie comes in. It's like the secret hybrid of a sleeping bag and a Snuggie. Only in satin. And you, blessedly, can't walk around in it.</p> <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/i5aB_8VLRA8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/i5aB_8VLRA8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p> <p><a href="https://www.buydreamie.com">The Original Dreamie</a> [Official Site] (Thanks, <a href="http://consumerist.com/5397766/consumerist-meetup-great-success">GitEmSteveDave</a>!)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399646/the-dreamie-its-like-a-snuggie-that-you-sleep-in]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399646</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ New And Exciting Products ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Dreamie ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ snuggie ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:00:11 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399646&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Expansion And Extension Of Homebuyer Tax Credit Now Official [Real Estate] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/4052635932_6c793414fa_m.jpg" height="236" width="158" />As anticipated, President Obama signed the 8,000 first-time homebuyer <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #taxcredit" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #taxcredit" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/taxcredit/">tax credit</a> extension into law on Friday. You can now collect the credit if your home purchase is complete by June 30, 2010. But wait, there's more! The extension also offers a tax credit for people who are purchasing a new residence, but aren't first-time homeowners.</p> <p>The key, of course, is that the newly purchased home needs to be a primary residence&mdash;no rental properties or vacation homes, thank you. Current homeowners within the income guidelines can receive a $6,500 credit after purchasing a new home&mdash;new homeowners will still receive $8,000.<br /> <a href="http://www.usnews.com/money/blogs/the-home-front/2009/11/06/expanded-first-time-home-buyer-tax-credit-becomes-law.html"><br /> Expanded First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit Becomes Law</a> [U.S. News & World Report]</p> <p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/faircompanies/4052635932/">nicolas.boullosa</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399821/expansion-and-extension-of-homebuyer-tax-credit-now-official]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399821</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Real Estate ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Federal Government ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Government ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ IRS ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ New homebuyer's credit ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ tax credit ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Taxes ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:00:50 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399821&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ $1.26 Billion Glorified Tap Water Judgment Against Pepsi Thrown Out [Aquafina] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/10/cat_faucet.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Good news for Pepsico: the lawsuit two Wisconsin men filed, accusing the company of stealing from them the idea that eventually became Aquafina, will have to be judged on its actual merits. The default judgment of $1.26 billion that they received when Pepsi failed to acknowledge the suit <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/business/69437027.html">has been vacated.</a></p> <blockquote> <p>At a hearing Friday, PepsiCo attorney Dean Panos argued that Erwin should vacate her prior order because Wisconsin law disfavors default judgments. Panos also argued that since the case had barely begun, the plaintiffs would not be harmed, and that no default judgment can stand if the underlying complaint is defective.</p> </blockquote> <p>The men allege that Pepsi stole their proprietary idea for purifying and selling tap water, and turned it into the inexplicable success that is Aquafina.</p> <p><a href="http://www.jsonline.com/business/69437027.html">Judge scraps $1.26 billion judgment against Pepsi</a> [Journal Sentinel] <em>(Thanks, Emily!)</em></p> <p><strong>PREVIOUSLY:</strong><br> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5392454/misplaced-letter-costs-pepsico-126-billion-in-bottled-water-lawsuit">Misplaced Letter Costs PepsiCo $1.26 Billion In Bottled Water Lawsuit</a></p> <p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/melauer/">marcus_in_ny</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399617/126-billion-glorified-tap-water-judgment-against-pepsi-thrown-out]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399617</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Aquafina ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ bottled water ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Courts ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Judges ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Lawsuits ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Pepsi ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Pepsico ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:00:34 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399617&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Are Postcard-Sized Rebate Checks A Conspiracy? [Annoyances] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/3729557187_5aa34c156a_m.jpg" width="158" height="105" />So you've fought <a href="http://consumerist.com/5218485/dilbert-encounters-the-rebate-monster">the mighty rebaterus</a> and won, prying your hard-won mail-in rebate money from its claws. If your rebate isn't in the form of a prepaid debit card, it's probably a postcard-sized check&mdash;cheap to mail, simple, easy. For the rebate fulfillment company. For the consumer depositing checks via ATM as banks cut back on their hours, it's not so simple or easy. </p> <p>Reader Chris writes:</p> <blockquote><p>I've noticed that several times, I've received checks from mail-in rebate offers that refuse to scan in the newer check-scanning ATMs that my bank (Bank of America) has deployed, replacing envelope-deposit ATMs, and that I'm sure other large banks have put into service as well.</p> <p>These are the checks that are mailed outside of envelopes, like postcards - the check is printed along with your mailing address, postage info, etc. Apparently the thickness of the card stock causes the check to get rejected outright by every check-scanning ATM I've tried them on. And if it does make it to the "scan" stage, the ATM then rejects it as unreadable.</p> <p>Obviously, this means that in order to deposit the rebate check, I now have to visit an actual bank branch - not a big deal for me, but I'm sure that this extra hurdle for enough people that it edges the "uncollected" percentage up a couple points, which is good news for everyone except the customer. While this appears completely coincidental - the postcard-style check is cheaper to mail than a traditional paper check - I can certainly see the rebate processors not rushing to fix this, um, "fringe benefit" of the format.</p></blockquote> <p>Probably not a consiracy, but definitely an inconvenience.</p> <p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/29143375@N05/3729557187/">Gamma-Ray Productions</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399400/are-postcard+sized-rebate-checks-a-conspiracy]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399400</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Annoyances ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ ATMs ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Checks ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Rebates ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:00:45 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399400&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Contact HSBC Bank USA's CEO [Banks] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/hsbc.jpg" width="158" height="118" />Having trouble with HSBC? <a href="http://consumerist.com/366595/updated-reach-hsbc-executive-customer-service">Executive customer service</a> no help? Here's where to contact the president and CEO of HSBC Bank USA.</p> <p>paul.j.lawrence@us.hsbc.com</p> <p>Paul J. Lawrence<br /> President/CEO<br /> HSBC Bank USA, N.A.<br /> 452 5th Avenue<br /> New York, NY 10018</p> <p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/maulleigh/393119823/">Maulleigh</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399411/contact-hsbc-bank-usas-ceo]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399411</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Banks ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Contact Info ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ E-mail ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Executive Customer Service ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Executives ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:00:29 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399411&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Laundromats Enter Underfilled Recession Cycle [Laundry] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/laundromat.jpg" width="158" height="130" />Are you doing laundry this weekend? Are you running fewer loads than you used to, going longer between washes, or even using a friend or relative's equipment in order to avoid unloading a pocketful of quarters at the laundromat? If so, you're not alone. Laundromats, once thought to be a recession-proof business, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125728737379626349.html">are surprisingly vulnerable to economic downturns</a>.</p> <p>People always need to do laundry&mdash;the question is how often, and where. </p> <blockquote><p> Yet in a measure of the potency of this particular downturn, some coin laundries are closing, and many others are battling sales declines. Job loss and economic woe are forcing Americans to cut back even on their laundry costs, either by using the home equipment of friends or relatives or by wearing items multiple times between washes. Even urban flight and reverse migration due to economic hardship appear to be agitating the industry.</p> <p>"Now more than ever the adage that we're recession-proof is being tested," says Brian Wallace, president of the Coin Laundry Association.</p></blockquote> <p>Where do you do your laundry, and have your habits changed in the last few years? Do you try to save a few quarters by wearing jeans an extra day or two? </p> <p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125728737379626349.html">Even Laundries Tumble in This Economic Cycle</a> [Wall Street Journal] <em>(Thanks, PecanPi!)</em></p> <p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/malias/45334151/">malias</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399365/laundromats-enter-underfilled-recession-cycle]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399365</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Laundry ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ laundromats ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Recession ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ recession watch ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:00:03 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399365&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Taking Credit Card Offers Hurts Your Credit [Credit] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/3529034253_7564999299_m.jpg" width="157" height="117" />Last week, I wrote about how to <a href="http://consumerist.com/5393595/how-to-cash-in-on-your-good-credit">turn your good credit into cash</a>. I purposely excluded <a href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/credit-card-offers-promotions-list.html">credit card offers</a> from the list because I wanted things that, should you implement them, wouldn't hurt your credit. Today, I want to warn to the overzealous.</p> <p>Despite the credit crisis, there are a lot of credit cards still offering new accounts a special bonus. Some award you points after your first purchase. Others offer you cash back after you spend more than a certain dollar amount. In fact, New York Times money blog Bucks <a href="http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/the-best-credit-card-signup-bonus-ever/">reported that the British Airways Visa Signature card</a> would soon be offering a staggering 100,000-mile promotion, worth two round-trip tickets, to new cardholders, making it one of the richest offers I've ever seen. </p> <p>It sounds like a win-win situation right?</p> <p><strong>Unfortunately, every time you take advantage of one of these offers your credit score takes a punch to the face.</strong> Everytime you apply for a card, your credit report gets hit with a <a href="http://consumerist.com/5101305/hard-and-soft-credit-inquiries-and-how-one-hurts-your-credit-score">hard inquiry</a> and those hard inquiries negatively impact your score by a few points. The exact number of points it goes down is unknown but you can rest assured it will go down.</p> <p>If you're not planning a major purchase within six to twelve months, it's not a big deal. If you are, you could see much higher interest rates on those loans... making that bonus look really stupid.</p> <p>Are there offers that won't ding your credit? Yes.</p> <p><strong>In general, promotional offers from banks and brokers will not hurt your credit.</strong> Since there is no extension of credit, banks and brokers usually won't pull your credit but you should call to confirm this. Banks will not conduct a hard inquiry unless you open a checking account with overdraft protection. Brokers will usually not do a hard inquiry unless you open a margin account. In both cases the bank or broker may find themselves lending you money for a short period of time, which is why they do a hard pull.</p> <p>Outside of those two more common scenarios, they will only do soft pulls to confirm your identity, as required by law. Bank offers will usually be in the $100 range and you'll be expected to maintain a sizable deposit, setup bill payments, and establish a monthly direct deposit before they'll pay out a promotion. Brokers will usually require a minimum deposit and at least one trade. The promotional requirements are usually not terribly onerous.</p> <p>With the economy starting to recover, I think you'll start seeing more and more of these offers.</p> <p>Jim writes about money at <a href="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles/">personal finance blog Bargaineering.com</a>.</p> <p><em>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/armydre2008/3529034253/">armydre2008</a>)</em></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398972/taking-credit-card-offers-hurts-your-credit]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398972</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Credit ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Banking ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Brokers ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Cards ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Report ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ score ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:02:52 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bargaineering.com</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398972&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Seattle Coffee Direct Decides You Need $40 Worth Of Coffee Per Day [Subscriptions] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/31/2009/11/thumb160x_332176768_b3e748bf3a_m.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/food_drink/Seattle_Coffee_Direct_Decides_You_Need_40_of_Coffee_a_Day" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>If you've been tempted by Facebook ads promising cheap "introductory" offers from <a href="http://www.seattlecoffeedirect.com" rel="nofollow">Seattle Coffee Direct</a> or <a href="https://www.worldbeancafe.com/" rel="nofollow">World Bean Cafe</a>, located in the world coffee capital of Evanston, Illinois, readers Adam and Ivan say, "don't do it!" The ads promise t-shirts or a free coffee grinder as an incentive to sign up, or tempting introductory offers. But you're really signing up for a coffee delivery service for close to $80 per month. Or more, as reader Ivan learned. He says that the company accidentally billed him for, and sent, two bags of coffee <em>per day.</em></p> <p>A few months ago, Adam was drawn in by a Facebook ad promising five North Face t-shirts for $5.</p> <blockquote> <p>I signed up for a $5 introductory offer from <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #seattlecoffeedirect" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/seattlecoffeedirect/">Seattle Coffee Direct</a>. I thought, "Why not?" Well the coffee arrives and I notice on my bank statement a charge for $28.10, not $5. Then I notice two charges three days apart for $38.95. When I finally call, things really get interesting. When I first get Mike from CS on the line, I don't even give him my name, acct number or anything, and he's already saying he can close the account and refund the money, two things I had yet to even ASK for. Obviously, they have to do a lot of this. What I come to find out is that by (stupidly) giving them my information, they had signed me up for twice-weekly coffee shipments, at a cost of $38.95 per week. Unbelievable.</p> </blockquote> <p>Meanwhile, a few weeks ago, Ivan shared with us his sad story of a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #worldbeancafe" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/worldbeancafe/">World Bean Cafe</a> order turned into an epic saga in search of his refund.</p> <blockquote> <p>Please warn your readers about this company or companies. It sells coffee beans and I was sucked in via a Facebook ad. Yes, I know, or at least I should have known better. Against my better judgment I went ahead and ordered from them back in May of this year. It has been a nightmare since.</p> <p>I received my initial shipment. The week following this I received another order of coffee. I thought this was odd so I checked my credit card online system. There were 7 charges from World Bean Café at $38.95 a pop! I called them immediately and they cancelled any further orders. The representative gave me a lame excuse of not specifying a shipment frequency (there was no way to specify a frequency on the order form) and that it defaulted to two bags of coffee ordered every day. Huh?</p> <p>According to my credit card company all the transactions were manually entered into a POS system so that excuse is pretty iffy. She then said I should send the coffee back and I should get the credit within 60 days. Ugh! That week the orders of coffee started to come in. I refused them. &gt;</p> <p>I waited for the credits which should have been done in the beginning of August. No credits. I called again and was told it would be at least another 30 days. No credits in the beginning of September. I called on 9/17 and was apologized to and they said it would be 5-7 business days before I received my credit. Now it is October 1 with no credits. I call again and speak to a representative named "Ralph" and he gives me the same 5-7 day spiel. Not happy with the answer, I ask to speak to a manager. I was connected to "Lucy" who says she is going to manually enter the credits into her system and gives me the 5-7 day speech. I wait. October 12 rolls around and still no credits. I checked this morning and no credits have posted to my account. All this time I have been paying interest on these transactions and am fed up. I have started the charge back procedures with my credit card company. Hopefully that will be the end of it.</p> <p>Lesson learned and all I can say is, "Never Again!"</p> </blockquote> <p>The coffee subscription scheme has been around for a long time&mdash;look at Gevalia&mdash;but the Facebook ads seem to be a new phenomenon. Let this serve as a lesson to Adam, Ivan, and all of our readers: always scroll down and make sure to read all of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #fineprint" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/fineprint/">fine print</a>.</p> <p>What the company actually promises (or maybe "threatens") is to ship two bags of coffee to subscribers every two weeks.</p> <blockquote> <p>Semimonthly Program: Twice a month you will receive a package with 2 bags of coffee and will be billed $12.90 per bag of coffee, plus $6.95 per bag for shipping and handling.</p> </blockquote> <p>So they're charging for shipping alone a bit less than you might pay for a pound of mediocre coffee on sale.</p> <p>Speaking of pounds, though, there is no mention on the site of how big a bag is. Forget the grocery shrink ray that puts 12-ounce bags of coffee on store shelves&mdash;the packets pictured on the site look smaller than a pound.</p> <p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fajalar/332176768/">Matthew Oliphant</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398309/seattle-coffee-direct-decides-you-need-40-worth-of-coffee-per-day]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398309</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Subscriptions ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Coffee ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Facebook ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Fine Print ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Seattle coffee direct ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Top ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ World bean cafe ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:00:09 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398309&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Sears Declares Halloween "Black Friday" [Close Enough] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/blackfridaynow.jpg" height="107" width="158">Forget <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #christmascreep" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/christmascreep/">Christmas creep</a>. How about Black Friday creep? Sears went ahead and declared last weekend, October 30 and 31st, the beginning of Black Friday, and told their mailing list so.</p> <p>Larry received this e-mail, with the subject line "HO-HO-HO...Black Friday Starts Today."</p> <p>No. It doesn't. Sears, you're doing it very, very wrong.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/Picture-8_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/31/2009/11/500x_Picture-8_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <p><strong>RELATED:</strong><br> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5398745/poll-when-is-too-early-for-christmas-creep">POLL: When Is Too Early For Christmas Creep?</a><br> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5375873/hobby-lobby-worships-the-great-pumpkin-with-halloween-tree">Hobby Lobby Worships The Great Pumpkin With Halloween Tree</a><br> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5308877/kmart-launches-christmas-site-in-july">Kmart Launches Christmas Site In July</a></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399008/sears-declares-halloween-black-friday]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399008</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Close enough ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ christmas creep ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ doing it wrong ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Holiday mashups ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Holidays ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:00:55 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399008&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Bill Collector Accused Of Offering Debt Forgiveness For Sex [Creepy] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/2192192956_c9023211ca_m.jpg" width="158" height="127" />A Rent-A-Center employee near Detroit has allegedly found a new approach to helping consumers get out of debt: making their bills go away in exchange for sex. </p> <blockquote><p>They said he is an account representative for Rent-A-Center and went to the 21-year-old woman's home Oct. 22 to discuss a delinquent account. During the discussion, he turned the conversation into a sexual nature, offering to make her bill go away in exchange for a sex act, police said.</p> <p>Herron then exposed himself to her while taking her hand and placing on himself. The woman pulled away and Herron completed the sex act upon himself before leaving her home, police said.</p></blockquote> <p>In what universe is this a good idea? If the accusations are true, had he tried this same scheme on other women who simply didn't report it to police? </p> <p><a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20091104/NEWS04/91104066/1322/Bill-collector-accused-of-demanding-sex-for-debt-relief">Bill collector accused of demanding sex for debt relief</a> [Detroit Free Press] <em>(Thanks, Adam!)</em></p> <p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/striatic/2192192956/">striatic</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398311/bill-collector-accused-of-offering-debt-forgiveness-for-sex]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398311</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Creepy ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ bad behavior ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Bad ideas ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Crime ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Debt ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Debt Collectors ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ rent-a-center ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Sex ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398311&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Consumerist Friday Flickr Finds [Flickr] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/spodieodie/492472462/in/pool-consumerist"><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/110609-006-FF-jellyfish.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/31/2009/11/500x_110609-006-FF-jellyfish.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></a>Here are nine wonderful photos readers added to The Consumerist Flickr Pool this week, picked for neatness and usability in a Consumerist post. Check 'em out!</p> <p><br clear="all"> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/spodieodie/492472462/in/pool-consumerist">Chris Rief aka Spodie Odie</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mightyb/4081491796/" title="Ben by mightyb, on Flickr"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/31/2009/11/500x_4081491796_f487509289.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <p><br clear="all"> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mightyb/4081491796/" title="Ben by mightyb, on Flickr">mightyb</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/scarequotes/4076488621/" title="All this candy ... for me? by James Callan, on Flickr"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/31/2009/11/500x_4076488621_9b9cf8e59d.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <p><br clear="all"> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/scarequotes/4076488621/" title="All this candy ... for me? by James Callan, on Flickr">James Callan</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/a_ninjamonkey/4078778312/" title="Tamed Wild by Ninja M., on Flickr"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/31/2009/11/500x_4078778312_00a05df895.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <p><br clear="all"> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/a_ninjamonkey/4078778312/" title="Tamed Wild by Ninja M., on Flickr">Ninja M.</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/cyrusrassool/3852553825/" title="Lesnar Bridge HDR by cyrusrassool, on Flickr"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/31/2009/11/500x_3852553825_39e8dde27d.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <p><br clear="all"> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/cyrusrassool/3852553825/" title="Lesnar Bridge HDR by cyrusrassool, on Flickr">cyrusrassool</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dprubino/4070113271/" title="Screened by D.P. Rubino, on Flickr"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/31/2009/11/500x_4070113271_56061f0e25.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <p><br clear="all"> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dprubino/4070113271/" title="Screened by D.P. Rubino, on Flickr">D.P. Rubino</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sa_steve/4075662092/" title="Shitto by SA_Steve, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2600/4075662092_07dd36c951.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></a></p> <p><br clear="all"> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sa_steve/4075662092/" title="Shitto by SA_Steve, on Flickr">SA_Steve</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/digitizedchaos/4071266906/" title="lower half by digitizedchaos, on Flickr"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/31/2009/11/500x_4071266906_009a84a198.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <p><br clear="all"> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/digitizedchaos/4071266906/" title="lower half by digitizedchaos, on Flickr">digitizedchaos</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/legotech/3872061069/" title="Octopus playing a tuba by legotech, on Flickr"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/31/2009/11/500x_3872061069_459663368a.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <p><br clear="all"> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/legotech/3872061069/" title="Octopus playing a tuba by legotech, on Flickr">legotech</a></p> <p>Our Flickr Pool is the place where Consumerist readers go and upload photos for possible use in future Consumerist posts. Just be a registered Flickr user, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/consumerist/pool/">go here</a>, and click "Join Group?" up on the top right, and start hitting "send to group" on your individual photos you want to add to the pool.</p> <p>Note that if you want them to have a shot at ending up on the Consumerist Friday post, you'll need to open up your <a href="http://www.flickr.com/account/prefs/sharing">sharing settings</a> on your Flickr account so we can grab the HTML from the "Share This" tab. Sorry, but that's the only way to get Flickr and Consumerist to play with each other.</p> <p>Add your shots to <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/consumerist/pool/">The Consumerist Flickr Pool</a>, and perhaps they'll get featured in a future story, or even highlighted in a Friday Consumerist Flickr Pool Finds post. See previous winners of the Friday Consumerist Flickr Pool finds <a href="http://consumerist.com/tag/flickr/roundups">here</a>.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399169/consumerist-friday-flickr-finds]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399169</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Flickr ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Readers ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Roundups ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:55:32 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Chris Walters</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399169&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Capital One Activates Payment Protection Plan Thanks To EECB [Follow Ups] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/110609-005-capone.jpg" width="160" height="160" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" />Earlier this week, I posted about a college student who <a href="http://consumerist.com/5395540">couldn't get Capital One's Emergency Payment Protection Plan activated</a> on his account because of missed deadlines. Andon wrote back today to say that after he sent an EECB to the credit card company's executives, they apologized and activated the service.</p> <p>To recap, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #capitalone" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #capitalone" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/capitalone/">Capital One</a> told Andon to wait 30 days before calling in to request activation. When he followed their instructions and called back 30 days later, he was told that he had to have called 5 days earlier to activate it for that month. Then he was charged a late fee.</p> <p>Andon sent the company an Email Executive Carpet Bomb, or EECB, explaining what happened. This was the result: </p> <blockquote> <p>I would just like to let you know that I sent an EECB, and was contacted today by Greg at Capital One who worked out the problem for me. He said I was absolutely right about the problem with the first month of the Emergency Payment Protection (the whole waiting for thirty days since unemployment, but having to have called five days before the payment's due date,) and that there is actually a special exception program in order to address this, but that it just wasn't followed properly in this case. They were very understanding, and apologized for the inconvenience - all is well, now.</p></blockquote> <p>Congratulations, Andon! Remember, if the front line of customer service at a company refuses to see logic or reason, try to <a href="http://consumerist.com/search/EECB/">escalate it to higher levels</a>. Frequently it's either a case of the CSR being powerless to help you, or a breakdown in training or communication.</p> <p>RELATED<br /> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5395540">"Capital One Tricks Customer Into Not Activating Emergency Payment Protection Plan"</a></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399164/capital-one-activates-payment-protection-plan-thanks-to-eecb]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399164</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Follow ups ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Capital One ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Credit Cards ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ eecbs ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Executives ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Happy Endings ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Insurance ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ late fees ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ protection plans ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Unemployment ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:25:10 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Chris Walters</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399164&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Here Are Your Shipping Deadlines For Christmas 2009 [Online Shopping] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/110609-004-christmascat.jpg" width="160" height="160" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" />If you're planning on spending the next 6-8 weeks pouring cash into Mammon's gaping maw&mdash;and really, who isn't? it's how we love each other&mdash;then here are the <a href="http://www.couponsherpa.com/online-coupons/holiday-shipping-deadlines/">shipping deadlines for over 100 online retailers</a>, courtesy of CouponSherpa. In today's UPS/FedEx world you can frequently wait right up until Christmas week, but you might want to double-check the list if there's a retailer you absolutely have to shop from.</p> <p><a href="http://www.couponsherpa.com/online-coupons/holiday-shipping-deadlines/">"Holiday Shipping Deadlines for Christmas 2009"</a> [CouponSherpa] <i>(Thanks to Jeff!)</i><br /> (Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dierken/2137618072/">dierken</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399096/here-are-your-shipping-deadlines-for-christmas-2009]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399096</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Online Shopping ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Christmas ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Deadlines ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Gifts ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Holidays ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Shipping ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Websites ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:50:15 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Chris Walters</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399096&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Walmart Goes Crazy On Couple Suspected Of Shoplifting [Walmart Is Your God Now] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/110609-003-walmart.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Walmart can try to spin itself as being on the side of good all it wants, but if it ever <a href="http://www.southbendtribune.com/article/20091102/NEWS01/911010358">suspects you of shoplifting</a>, you may find that you're powerless to fight back. In the case of a couple accused of shoplifting some Bic lighters in Niles, Michigan this past August, Walmart detained them, the police came and cuffed one of them, their two kids were taken to a security room, and&mdash;after a review of security footage proved the couple's innocence&mdash;they were banned for life from all Walmarts. To top it off, Walmart's legal team has sent the couple a letter asking to be reimbursed for 10 times the value of the lighters, even though the police determined no shoplifting had taken place.</p> <p>(It's unclear whether the couple ever actually paid for the Bic lighters in question&mdash;the article only specifies that the footage shows they scanned the package of lighters but that the scanner didn't register it.)</p> <p>The couple in question is gay and their sons are adopted, which may have introduced a whole new level of emotional reactions on both sides of the dispute. The men say their children told them that while they were being held in the security room, the security staff threatened the kids and "had made disparaging remarks about Paolucci and Hitchcock's lifestyle." It's not a stretch to imagine that such an attitude, if it existed, carried over into any face-to-face interactions. Meanwhile, the police who showed up and cuffed Paolucci, then forced the two men into the backs of different squad cars, claim that the men were causing a disturbance when they arrived at the scene.</p> <p>Still, no amount of pro-gay or anti-gay outrage makes it okay for a retailer to place paying customers in such an abusive situation, especially when the retailer's own security footage&mdash;which was immediately available for review&mdash;shows that if there was any inventory issue it was due to a malfunction of the scanner. But Walmart can get away with it because it can afford to:</p> <blockquote> <p>Asked if they intend to sue Wal-Mart, Paolucci said he and Hitchcock probably won't because other attorneys have advised them Wal-Mart historically "plays hardball" and isn't prone to settle cases out of court.</p> <p>"We could spend a couple million dollars to sue them," Paolucci said.</p> <p>But that doesn't mean there won't be court action. Paolucci and Hitchcock e-mailed The Tribune a copy of a letter from a law firm representing Wal-Mart seeking 10 times the retail price of the items the store still claims were shoplifted by Paolucci. The letter states the matter will be dropped if Paolucci submits the $158.40 payment.</p> </blockquote> <p>Fortunately, the men seem to have enough money that they can afford to never shop at the discount retailer again, even if they weren't banned for life. If you're not part of a wealthy two-income family, though... well hopefully Walmart will look down favorably upon you when your post-checkout time comes, so long as you act contrite and respectful of their security team's authority.</p> <p>(Oh yeah, now I remember why <a href="http://consumerist.com/5396164/walmart-prepares-for-new-push-into-major-urban-areas">I don't want a Walmart anywhere near where I live</a>.)</p> <p><i>*Note: I originally reported the Walmart as being located in Niles, Illinois. However, the South Bend Tribune generally covers areas in Michigan and Indiana, and the couple lives in Buchanan, Michigan, which also has a Niles located nearby. I've updated the post to report the Walmart as being located in Niles, Michigan. -Chris</i></p> <p><a href="http://www.southbendtribune.com/article/20091102/NEWS01/911010358">"Niles couple banned from Wal-Mart after dispute over BIC lighters"</a> [South Bend Tribune] <i>(Thanks to Shanon!)</i></p> <p>RELATED<br> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5249853/loomis-rent+a+cops-have-shopper-cuffed-hauled-away-over-atm-photo">"Loomis Rent-A-Cops Have Shopper Cuffed, Hauled Away Over ATM Photo"</a><br> (Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/walmartmovie/34814103/">Brave New Films</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399061/walmart-goes-crazy-on-couple-suspected-of-shoplifting]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399061</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Walmart is your god now ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ abuse ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ abuse of power ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Accusations ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Banishments ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Banned ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Civil Liberties ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Detainment ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ harassment ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Police ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Receipt checking ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Receipts ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Security ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Top ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Walmart ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:16:28 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Chris Walters</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399061&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Droid vs. iPhone: A 10-Round Bout CR Electronics ... [] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/31/2009/11/thumb160x_crlogo_04.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /> <strong><a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/electronics/2009/11/droid-motorola-verizon-smart-phone-review-iphone-apple-comparison-head-to-head-features-gps-navigation-touch-screen-interface.html?EXTKEY=I91ECON&CMP=OTC-ConsumeristLinks">Droid vs. iPhone: A 10-Round Bout</a></strong> CR Electronics tests both phones and finds that each side has its advantages and flaws. The biggest advantage of the Droid: It's not on AT&T. [<a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/electronics/2009/11/droid-motorola-verizon-smart-phone-review-iphone-apple-comparison-head-to-head-features-gps-navigation-touch-screen-interface.html?EXTKEY=I91ECON&CMP=OTC-ConsumeristLinks">Consumer Reports Electronics</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398947/]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398947</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ ]]></category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:58:45 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Alex Chasick</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398947&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Bally Reps Drove Developmentally Disabled Man To Gym, Signed Him Up [Taking Advantage] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/110609-001-bally-total-fitness.jpg" width="160" height="160" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" />Family members of a developmentally disabled 49-year-old man told 6 News in Indianapolis that two men from Bally Total Fitness showed up at the man's apartment, <a href="http://www.theindychannel.com/news/21512447/detail.html">drove him to a Bally location at Pike Plaza</a>, and signed him up to a monthly membership. When the man's family asked Bally to invalidate the agreement, the gym refused.</p> <blockquote> <p>The brothers told [6News reporter Rafael] Sanchez that they went to the gym Monday hoping to resolve the issue, but that their requests were rejected by the management at the facility.</p> <p>[...]</p> <p>"I'm wondering how more people are they going to do it to? After meeting two young gentlemen yesterday, they don't feel they've done anything wrong," said [brother] Pat Hannon. "They feel it's their right to get America fit."</p></blockquote> <p>So there you have it. Bally's wants the developmentally disabled to be physically fit. I don't see how that's a bad thing&mdash;we should all take care of our health&mdash;but it seems weird to target men and women who, you know, <i>can't drive themselves to the gym they're joining</i>. Maybe the two salesmen who showed up at the apartment&mdash;where "no soliciting" signs are posted&mdash;should agree to shuttle their new client back and forth whenever he feels like it.</p> <p><br clear="all" /></p> <hr width="50%" /><br clear="all" /></p> <p><b>Update:</b> Bally's PR firm just contacted us with the following statement on behalf of the gym: </p> <blockquote> <p>We regret that this incident occurred and have accordingly addressed the issue with the employees involved. It is common practice that we market our clubs with free trial passes to the local community but it is against our corporate policy to transport anyone to or from our facility. When our management found out about Mr. Hannon's disability, we immediately cancelled his membership and refunded all of his fees.</p></blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.theindychannel.com/news/21512447/detail.html">"Family: Gym Took Advantage Of Man With Disability"</a> [WRTV Indianapolis] <i>(Thanks to Becky!)</i><br /> (Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/65439930@N00/3103272142/">geocam20000</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5399038/bally-reps-drove-developmentally-disabled-man-to-gym-signed-him-up]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5399038</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Taking advantage ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Agreements ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Bally ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Disabled ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ gyms ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ hard sells ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ membership ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ predatory ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Sales quotas ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Top ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:38:29 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Chris Walters</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5399038&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Iowa Feline Catches Swine Flu [H1N1] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/31/2009/11/thumb160x_cat_pig.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />When you're home sick, snuggling with a pet can have tremendous healing powers. "Plus," you might say to yourself, "at least Fluffy can't catch this awful <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #swineflu" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/swineflu/">swine flu</a> I have." Well....not so fast. It's not common, but <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/checkup/2009/11/cat_catches_swine_flu.html">a cat in Iowa</a> has been diagnosed with, and recovered from, swine flu.</p> <blockquote> <p>The 13-year-old indoor cat in Iowa was brought to the Lloyd Veterinary Medical Center at Iowa State University's College of Veterinary Medicine, where it tested positive for the H1N1 virus. ...</p> <p>"Two of the three members of the family that owns the pet had suffered from influenza-like illness before the cat became ill," said IDPH Public Health Veterinarian, Dr. Ann Garvey. "This is not completely unexpected, as other strains of influenza have been found in cats in the past." Both the cat and its owners have recovered from their illnesses.</p> </blockquote> <p>Perhaps this is the cue for pet stores across the country to set up displays of tiny paper masks and bottles of paw sanitizer.</p> <p><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/checkup/2009/11/cat_catches_swine_flu.html">Cat catches swine flu</a> [Washington Post] <em>(Thanks, Sarah!)</em><br> <a href="http://www.idph.state.ia.us/IdphNews/Reader.aspx?id=8FBE90B3-4667-4960-9AF5-1B9B477A3805">Protecting Pets from Illness</a> [Iowa Department of Public Health]</p> <p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/cafepocacosa/145633650/">htby</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398986/iowa-feline-catches-swine-flu]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398986</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ H1N1 ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Cats ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Flu ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Iowa ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Pets ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Swine flu ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ veterinarians ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:15:19 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398986&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Top Posts Of The Week And Open Thread [Roundups] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/cat_cords.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5394712/radio-shack-sales-staff-unfazed-by-2400-markup">Radio Shack Sales Staff Unfazed By 2,400% Markup</a><br> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5395978/reader-paid-my-t+mobile-bill-saw-some-boobs">Reader: "Paid My T-Mobile Bill, Saw Some Boobs"</a><br> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5395594/hyundai-replaces-car-destroyed-in-bmw-parking-lot-attack">Hyundai Replaces Car Destroyed In BMW Parking Lot Attack</a><br> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5397214/t+mobile-surprise-porn-not-an-isolated-incident">T-Mobile Surprise Porn Not An Isolated Incident</a><br> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5395743/50-things-restaurant-staffers-should-never-do">50 Things Restaurant Staffers Should Never Do</a></p> <p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bfsminid/">Mini D</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398949/top-posts-of-the-week-and-open-thread]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398949</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Roundups ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ open thread ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ top posts ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:30:20 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Laura Northrup</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398949&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Reporter Actually Measures Noodles In Campbell's Soup [Nifty] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/11-6-2009_2-00-40_PM.jpg" width="160" height="110" /><a href="http://consumerist.com/5398431/campbells-brags-about-its-noodle-length">32' of noodles </a>is about 10 yards, so a reporter from KING5 in Seattle decided to lay them out, end by end, starting at the 10 yard line of a fooball field, to see if he could score a noodley touchdown. We applaud this effort. </p> <p><object height="288" width="470"><param name="movie" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" value="http://www.king5.com/v/?i=67875162" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="AllowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.king5.com/v/?i=67875162" AllowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" height="288" wmode="transparent" width="470"></embed></object> We have to say we're not surprised by the results. We trust that Campbell's understands <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #chickensoup" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #chickensoup" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/chickensoup/">chicken soup</a> manufacturing. </p> <p><a href="http://www.king5.com/news/consumer/Let-Jesse-Buy-It-Noodles-67875162.html">Let Jesse Buy It: Noodles</a> [KING 5] <em>(Thanks,Cherise!)</em></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398918/reporter-actually-measures-noodles-in-campbells-soup]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398918</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ nifty ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Advertising ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Campbells ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ chicken soup ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Soup ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:15:06 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Meg Marco</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398918&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ iPhone App Developer Sued For Stealing Users' Phone Numbers [Storm8] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/vampire.jpg" width="158" height="194" />For secretly stealing users' phone number by exploiting a backdoor iPhone vulnerability, app developer Storm8 got slapped with a class action lawsuit.</p> <p>Storm8 makes games like Vampires Live and iMobsters, that operate very similar to the popular Facebook game "Mafia Wars," including letting you spend real money to get better weapons and more energy in the game. Many of Storm8's titles are top iPhone game app downloads, probably because each game says that you can get extra points in it if you download one of their other games.</p> <p><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/05/iphone-game-dev-accu.html">BoingBoing reports</a> that the number harvesting was hidden until the company noted it in August, chalking it up as a bug. However, the lawsuits says that only "very specific and specialized software code" could do that. Storm8 has not returned BoingBoing's requests for comment.</p> <p><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/lawsuits/Complaint_Storm_8_Nov_04_2009.pdf">Lawsuit text</a> (PDF)</p> <p><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/05/iphone-game-dev-accu.html">iPhone game dev accused of stealing players' phone numbers</a> [BoingBoing] (Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/-cavin-/3183352832/">Cаvin 〄</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398915/iphone-app-developer-sued-for-stealing-users-phone-numbers]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398915</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Storm8 ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Blogs ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Cellphones ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Class Action Lawsuits ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Class Actions ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Fraud ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ iPhone ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ iPhone Apps ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Lawsuits ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Privacy ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Security ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Telephony ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:08:47 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ben Popken</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398915&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ POLL: When Is Too Early For Christmas Creep? [I Want Egg Nog Year Round] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/christmasinaugust.jpg" width="158" height="126" />After we <a href="http://consumerist.com/5398150/starbucks-decides-its-time-for-christmas">proposed tracking</a> Starbucks's roll out of Christmas products as a metric to gauge yearly <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #christmascreep" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #christmascreep" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/christmascreep/">Christmas Creep</a>, we got a fair amount of comments saying they saw no problem with Christmas stuff coming out once Halloween was over. So, inside, a poll: at what point does Christmas Creep become acceptable holiday display?</p> <p><br clear="all" /><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2218947.js"></script><noscript><br /> <a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2218947/">When is it ok to roll out Christmas displays and merchandise?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">answers</a>)</span><br /> </noscript></p> <p>As a follow-up to the Starbucks post, we received a couple emails from employees who told us that Starbucks begins using the red cups typically on the first Tuesday of November, but doesn't start offering the peppermint mocha and all that stuff until later-November 17, according to one tipster.</p> <p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomq/1295942215/">TMQ.st.louis</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398745/poll-when-is-too-early-for-christmas-creep]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398745</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ I want egg nog year round ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Christmas ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ christmas creep ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Decorations ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Holidays ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Merchandise ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Polls ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Shopping ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Starbucks ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Alex Chasick</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398745&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Walmart Refunds For Dead Frog Found In Salad [Dead Frogs] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/foundfrog.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />"Oh my God, I see eyes!" screamed Carla Hill after opening a bag of greens from Walmart.</p> <p>Staring back up from her preparations for Sunday dinner was a whole dead frog, an unwelcome interloper who arrived via a bag of Glory Mustard Greens. "I hate frogs," said Carla.</p> <p>Walmart said they are going to work with the manufacturer and refund the customer's money.</p> <p>Carla plans on getting her salad from a different source in the future. "The next greens I eat will be growing in my garden outside," she told UPI.</p> <p>Check out the <a href="http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/281592">video on Digital Journal</a>.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398874/walmart-refunds-for-dead-frog-found-in-salad]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398874</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Dead frogs ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Food ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Found food ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Health ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Longview ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Salads ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Texas ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Walmart ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:15:03 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ben Popken</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398874&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Meet JC Penney's Notoriously "Obese" Mannequins [Classy] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/11-6-2009_12-52-41_PM.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Over at The Awl there is an intensively researched fact-check of Cintra Wilson's <a href="http://consumerist.com/5336276/jc-penney-in-manhattan-harbinger-of-fashion-apocalypse-fat-suburbanites">review of the Manhattan JC Penney store,</a> which at the time, we described as "simultaneously hateful and boring." The <a href="http://www.theawl.com/2009/11/real-america-with-abe-sauer-a-visit-to-new-york-citys-jc-penney">review-of-the-review features photographs</a> of the mannequins Ms. Wilson described as "obese."</p> <p>From The Awl:</p> <blockquote> <p>But the most egregious claim Wilson makes about Penneys with regard to fatness is "[<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jcpenney" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/jcpenney/">JC Penney</a>] has the most obese mannequins I have ever seen." The "I have ever seen" clause in that statement is the one thing that prevents me from declaring this outright slander. In my time at Penneys, I never saw a mannequin that looked appreciably different from any other mannequin that I have ever seen. They were all rather tall and skinny-you know, like mannequins are.</p> </blockquote> <p>Yeah, we sort of thought so. The article also includes a fun round-up of instances in which Ms. Wilson uses the word "fat." <a href="http://www.theawl.com/2009/11/real-america-with-abe-sauer-a-visit-to-new-york-citys-jc-penney">Enjoy.</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.theawl.com/2009/11/real-america-with-abe-sauer-a-visit-to-new-york-citys-jc-penney">Real America with Abe Sauer: A Visit to New York City's JC Penney</a> [The Awl]</p> <p>PREVIOUSLY: <a href="http://consumerist.com/5336276/jc-penney-in-manhattan-harbinger-of-fashion-apocalypse-fat-suburbanites">J.C. Penney In Manhattan Harbinger Of Fashion Apocalypse, Fat Suburbanites</a><br> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5344642/new-york-times-wishes-it-had-not-published-snotty-jc-penney-review">New York Times Wishes It Had Not Published "Snotty" JC Penney Review</a></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398858/meet-jc-penneys-notoriously-obese-mannequins]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398858</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Classy ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ JC Penney ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ New York ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Shopping ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:12:51 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Meg Marco</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398858&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Save The Polar Bear Sweaters Are Nice, But Do The Bears Really Get The Cash? [Charities] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/polarbears.jpg" width="158" height="137" />So you're shopping and have a choice between Sweater A, and Sweater B, the one that saves <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #polarbears" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #polarbears" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/polarbears/">polar bears</a>. This so-called "embedded giving" where you buy something and part of the money goes towards a charity has become quite popular, especially during the holiday season, but did you ever stop to think if the polar bears are really getting the money? </p> <p>Some companies sell items saying that a "portion" or "share" goes to a charitable organization, but the actual percentage is not covered in any specific contract between them and the charity, or governed by disclosure requirements. This disturbing lack of transparency opens the door to companies that want to use the charity angle as a marketing hook, without passing on much in the way of bucks to the actual charities. For instance, the supposed recipients of charity dollars in an embedded giving campaign in a Barney's catalog only found out they were beneficiaries <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/13/us/13giving.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=strom%20%20shopping&st=cse">after the NYT talked to them</a>.</p> <p>If you really want to help out, donate directly to the charity. You can use a site like <a href="http://www.charitynavigator.org/">Charity Navigato</a>r to make sure that most of your money goes to the cause, and not the corporate coffers.</p> <p><a href="http://philanthropy.blogspot.com/2009/11/2009-embedded-giving-challenge.html">The 2009 Embedded Giving Challenge</a> [Philanthropy 2173] <em>(Thanks to C-side!)</em> (Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ajay/169660002/in/set-72157594169520005/">thelearnr</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398821/save-the-polar-bear-sweaters-are-nice-but-do-the-bears-really-get-the-cash]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398821</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Charities ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Blogs ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Charity ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ polar bears ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Readers ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Shopping ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Trust ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:46:21 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ben Popken</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398821&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ DVD Price War: Harry Potter, Star Trek For $10 [Video Wars] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/11-6-2009_11-54-34_AM.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Walmart announced yesterday that it will be slashing prices to below wholesale on 10 of the most popular DVDs that will be released soon, says the LA Times. Target announced that it will be matching Walmart. Amazon has not yet responded.</p> <p>The LA Times says:</p> <blockquote> <p>The price cuts are welcome news for movie studios because it could spur demand in a year of flagging DVD sales. The wholesale price paid by Walmart and its competitors remains unchanged at about $18, meaning studios will make the same profit despite the discounting.</p> <p>It's normal for retailers like Walmart to price DVDs below their wholesale cost at stores and online to draw customers who often spend more money on other items.</p> <p>Although discounting is not unusual for Walmart and Target, the new $10 price means the retailers will incur a big loss on each sale.</p> <p>It comes as the two companies and Amazon engage in a price war over books that has driven down the price of some hardcovers to $9.</p> </blockquote> <p>Will these new unsustainably low prices get you to skip Redbox or Netflix and actually buy a DVD?</p> <p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-redbox6-2009nov06,0,5920076.story">Walmart, Target slash online prices of popular DVDs</a> [LA Times]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398792/dvd-price-war-harry-potter-star-trek-for-10]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398792</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Video Wars ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Amazon ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ DVDs ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Entertainment ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Harry Potter ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ NetFlix ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Pricing ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Redbox ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Star Trek ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Target ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Walmart ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:06:07 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Meg Marco</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398792&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Hospital Sends $29,000 Bill To Parents Of Murdered College Student [Inappropriate] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/11-6-2009_11-35-53_AM.jpg" width="160" height="61" />Not only did the UC Davis Medical Center send a $29,186.50 bill to the parents of college student who was beaten to death by his roommate, they also sent a letter letting them know that their son was considered indigent and was no longer welcome at the hospital if he needed further treatment. He doesn't, of course, because he is deceased. </p> <p>Apparently he also had insurance, and the hospital should have sent the bill to his insurer. </p> <p>"I can't believe that in any country besides the U.S., any civilized country, that the parents of a murdered boy would receive this bill for $29,000 and such an insulting letter," Gerald Hawkins, the victim's father, told ABC 10 in Sacramento, CA.</p> <p>The bill in question was for "five minutes in [the hospital's] emergency room," says ABC 10, who tried to assess why 5 minutes could cost $29,000.</p> <blockquote><p>Scott Seamons with the California Hospital Council said the critical response to Hawkins is what cost the most. He said UC Davis is a Level 1 Trauma Center, which means the best and most expensive doctors were waiting for Scott.</p> <p>"Whether it was five minutes or 55 minutes doesn't really matter in the initial review and assessment of the patient," he said.</p> <p>Trauma surgeons, nurses, technicians and more had to treat Scott before they realized they couldn't help, according to Seamons.</p> <p>"They're all right there," he said. "And those are highly trained, highly specialized and highly paid clinical experts. Clearly in the aftermath, in hindsight, they looked at it and determined there was probably less need for that, but in the first five minutes all of those resources were right there at the side of this patient, and they cost a lot of money." </p></blockquote> <p>ABC 10 says that the letter included with the bill instructed the deceased to take his health care needs to a county clinic in the future. The hospital has apologized. </p> <p><a href="http://www.news10.net/news/story.aspx?storyid=69932&catid=2">Why was Murdered Sac State Student's ER Bill So High?</a> [News 10]<br /> <a href="http://www.news10.net/news/article.aspx?storyid=69832&provider=top&catid=188">Slain Sac State Student's Parents Stunned by Hospital Bill, Letter</a> [News 10]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398768/hospital-sends-29000-bill-to-parents-of-murdered-college-student]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398768</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ inappropriate ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ California ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Crime ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ heath care ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Top ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ trauma ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Uc david medical center ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:37:40 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Meg Marco</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398768&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 10 Things Learned About Life And Personal Finance [Money] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/reflection.jpg" width="158" height="123" />You blog for 3 years about money, life, and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #personalfinance" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #personalfinance" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/personalfinance/">personal finance</a>, all of which are interconnected, and you pick up a few things. Trent from The Simple Dollar shares the <a href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/10/30/the-ten-most-important-things-ive-learned-about-money-and-life-since-starting-the-simple-dollar/">10 most important lessons he's learned</a> since starting his personal finance blog. For starters, number 10, while it's easy to get caught up in trying to save one more nickel off every purchase, "Reliability and functionality worth a premium"!</p> <p>9. There are very few aspects of your life that cannot be changed.<br /> 8. Karma always comes around.<br /> 7. The more time you spend improving and educating yourself, the better your personal and financial life will be.<br /> 6. Blaming others for your problems is a dead-end road.<br /> 5. The fewer unsupportive people you have in your life, the better off you are.<br /> 4. The more supportive people you have in your life, the better off you are.<br /> 3. The most valuable resource in the world isn't money, it's time.<br /> 2. The second most important part of personal finance is setting clear, concrete goals.<br /> 1. The single most important part of personal finance is truly knowing yourself.</p> <p>Pretty meta, but once you think about it, it's our choices and behaviors and lifestyle that have the biggest impact on our bank account, rather than getting the one with the best APR or being the super-best at using online coupons.</p> <p>Do you agree with this list? Is there anything you would add or take away?</p> <p><a href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2009/10/30/the-ten-most-important-things-ive-learned-about-money-and-life-since-starting-the-simple-dollar/">The Ten Most Important Things I've Learned About Money and Life Since Starting The Simple Dollar</a> [The Simple Dollar] (Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/31693111@N03/3176755713/">sawyer87</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398750/10-things-learned-about-life-and-personal-finance]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398750</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Money ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Blogs ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Personal Finance ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:24:41 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ben Popken</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398750&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ What You Need To Know About Today's Unemployment Benefits Extension [Budgets] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/110609-002-looking-for-work.jpg" width="160" height="211" />If you're still struggling to <a href="http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/06/comparing-this-recession-to-previous-ones-job-losses-4/?src=twt&twt=nytimeseconomix">find a job in the current economy</a>, you'll be happy to know that this morning President Obama is expected to sign legislation to extend benefits for few more months. The New York Times has more info on how the extension will work, and who qualifies for it.</p> <p><a href="http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/06/extended-unemployment-benefits-faq/">"Extended Unemployment Benefits: F.A.Q."</a> [New York Times]<br /> (Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kapungo/1433434459/">Kapungo</a> and <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurenmanning/2319040610/">laurenatclemson</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5383379/what-you-need-to-know-about-todays-unemployment-benefits-extension]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5383379</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ budgets ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Benefits ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Finances ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Government ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Jobs ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Money ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Personal Finance ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Unemployment ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Work ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:10:43 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Chris Walters</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5383379&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Unemployment Hits A 26-Year High Of 10.2% [Recession Watch] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/11-6-2009_10-35-34_AM.jpg" width="160" height="229">The pace of job losses has slowed significantly, but the economy still divested itself of 190,000 jobs in October, sending the national unemployment rate to 10.2%, says the Bureau of Labor Statistics. It should be noted that the unemployment rate only tracks people actively seeking work.</p> <p>If you're interested in statistics the Bureau has another one that you might like. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment-to-population_ratio">employment-to-population ratio</a> calculates the proportion of the country's working-age population that is employed. Currently, our employment-to-population ratio is at 58.5%. Wikipedia tells us that a "high" ratio would be around 70%.</p> <p>There's also something called the "underemployment" rate, which tracks part-time workers and those who have simply given up. This rate is currently at 17.5%, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/07/business/economy/07jobs.html?_r=1&hp">says the NYT.</a></p> <p>As far as industries go, if you're in construction and manufacturing, you're in trouble. Manufacturing in particular has lost 2.1 million jobs in just the last 2 years.</p> <p>Heath care, however, is doing fine. The Bureau of Labor Statistics tells us that since the recession began, heath care has added 597,000 jobs.</p> <p>The news is most grim if you're a teenager: 27.6% of teenagers who are looking for work are unable to find it.</p> <p>Here's a scary/depressing graph:<br> <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/11-6-2009_10-26-03_AM.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/31/2009/11/500x_11-6-2009_10-26-03_AM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <p><a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">Employment Situation Summary</a> [Bureau of Labor Statistics]<br> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/07/business/economy/07jobs.html?_r=1&hp">U.S. Unemployment Rate Hits 10.2%, Highest in 26 Years</a> [NYT]<br> (Photo:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dullspork/3783644108/">Jay Adan</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398740/unemployment-hits-a-26+year-high-of-102]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398740</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ recession watch ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Economics ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Joblessness ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Statistics ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Top ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Unemployment ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:59:24 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Meg Marco</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398740&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 50 More Things Restaurant Staffers Should Never Do [Eating Out] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/11-6-2009_10-17-20_AM.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />As promised, here is <a href="http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/05/one-hundred-things-restaurant-staffers-should-never-do-part-2/?em">part II of the NYT "Stuff Restaurant Staffers Should Never Do" series.</a> The list was written by a fellow who is opening a seafood restaurant in Bridgehampton, NY. We've grabbed the most debate-worthy of them for your enjoyment.</p> <p>54. If there is a prix fixe, let guests know about it. Do not force anyone to ask for the "special" menu.</p> <p>58. Do not bring judgment with the ketchup. Or mustard. Or hot sauce. Or whatever condiment is requested.</p> <p>62. Do not fill the water glass every two minutes, or after each sip. You'll make people nervous.</p> <p>62(a). Do not let a glass sit empty for too long.</p> <p>64. Specials, spoken and printed, should always have prices.</p> <p>67. Never stack the plates on the table. They make a racket. Shhhhhh.</p> <p>70. Never deliver a hot plate without warning the guest. And never ask a guest to pass along that hot plate.</p> <p>78. Do not ask, "Are you still working on that?" Dining is not work - until questions like this are asked.</p> <p>82. If you drip or spill something, clean it up, replace it, offer to pay for whatever damage you may have caused. Refrain from touching the wet spots on the guest.</p> <p>85. Never bring a check until someone asks for it. Then give it to the person who asked for it.</p> <p>86. If a few people signal for the check, find a neutral place on the table to leave it.</p> <p>90. If someone is getting agitated or effusive on a cellphone, politely suggest he keep it down or move away from other guests.</p> <p>PREVIOUSLY: <a href="http://consumerist.com/5395743/50-things-restaurant-staffers-should-never-do">50 Things Restaurant Staffers Should Never Do</a></p> <p><a href="http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/05/one-hundred-things-restaurant-staffers-should-never-do-part-2/?em">100 Things Restaurant Staffers Should Never Do (Part 2)</a> [NYT]<br> <a href="http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/one-hundred-things-restaurant-staffers-should-never-do-part-one/">100 Things Restaurant Staffers Should Never Do (Part 1)</a> [NYT]<br> (Photo:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/flem007_uk/2927922286/">Mike Fleming</a>)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398709/50-more-things-restaurant-staffers-should-never-do]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398709</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ eating out ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Etiquette ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Restaurants ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Servers ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Top ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:20:37 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Meg Marco</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398709&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Blogger Says National Car Rental Tried To Pull Deal Switcheroo [When Good Deals Go Bad] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/car.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Christian personal finance blogger Peter chose not to turn the other cheek when he says <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nationalcarrental" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/nationalcarrental/">National Car Rental</a> tried to take away an unlimited mileage deal he and his wife signed up for when they went on vacation.</p> <p>After taking a road trip in Maine, Peter and his wife were charged more than $1,000 for an 8-day rental &mdash; more than twice the rate they agreed to &mdash; having been dinged for 40 cents a mile. Peter said patience and persistence helped him to get National to honor the unlimited mileage deal he signed up for.</p> <p>On his blog <a href="http://www.biblemoneymatters.com/2009/10/when-getting-great-deals-on-the-things-you-buy-make-sure-youre-actually-getting-the-deal.html">Bible Money Matters</a> he writes:</p> <blockquote> <p>After going back and forth for what seemed like an eternity (10 minutes?), the desk agent's supervisor came out. We explained our situation again, and how it would make no sense for us to rent a car for a long trip without having unlimited free mileage (like we signed up for). It must have been an issue with the rental agency's computer system not noting our complete deal?</p> <p>After talking with the supervisor for another 10 minutes, showing her the paperwork that we still had, and explaining what contract code we were using, she was able to confirm that the deal we had signed up for was legit. To her credit, and to National Car Rental's credit, she apologized for the problem, and found a way to write up the transaction that allowed us to pay what we had signed up for from the start.</p> </blockquote> <p>It's wise to read car rental contracts closely before you hit the road, then examine charges on your bill when you return the car. Peter seems to have made the right play by neither flipping out and causing a scene nor paying the ridiculous bill and hoping to get his money back afterward.</p> <p>Does anyone have any comparable rental car horror stories or near misses?</p> <p><a href="http://www.biblemoneymatters.com/2009/10/when-getting-great-deals-on-the-things-you-buy-make-sure-youre-actually-getting-the-deal.html">When Getting Great Deals On The Things You Buy, Make Sure You're Actually Getting The Deal</a> [Bible Money Matters]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398440/blogger-says-national-car-rental-tried-to-pull-deal-switcheroo]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398440</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ When good deals go bad ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Deals ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ National Car Rental ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Persistence ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Rental Cars ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Vacations ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:00:16 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Phil Villarreal</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398440&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Game Consoles, Dolls And Wooden Dogs Are The Best Toys Ever [Lists] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/dogs.jpg" width="158" height="130" />Did you play with a Slinky growing up? Well, that makes you a loser, because your toy didn't make <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #goodhousekeeping" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #goodhousekeeping" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/goodhousekeeping/">Good Housekeeping</a>'s Yahoo <a href="http://shopping.yahoo.com/articles/yshoppingarticles/280/the-best-toys-of-all-time/">list of the greatest toys</a> ever made.</p> <p>Winners include my full-time childhood caretaker, the Nintendo Entertainment System, the creepy stalker known as Furby and adorable, overfed Cabbage Patch Kids. </p> <p>There's even room for a weird dog on wheels that used to please kids of the 1920s, back before fun was invented. But no Slinky, because it lacked dog, wood, wheels and the ability to play Tecmo Bowl.</p> <p>Them, of course, be debatin' words. So let's have it, commenters &mdash; what's your favorite toy ever?</p> <p><a href="http://shopping.yahoo.com/articles/yshoppingarticles/280/the-best-toys-of-all-time/">The Best Toys of All Time</a> [Yahoo, via <a href="http://kotaku.com/5397923/yahoo-nes-dreamcast-best-toys-of-all-time">Kotaku</a>]<br /> (Photo: Yahoo)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398418/game-consoles-dolls-and-wooden-dogs-are-the-best-toys-ever]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398418</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Lists ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Gifts ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Good Housekeeping ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Holiday Shopping ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Shopping ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Toys ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Yahoo ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:59:30 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Phil Villarreal</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398418&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Campbell's Brags About Its Noodle Length [But What About The Girth?] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/soup.jpg" width="158" height="116" />Campbell's wants you to know it packs <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=140017">32 feet of noodles</a> inside every can, and it's paid for a Times Square billboard to teach that fact to you, AdAge reports.</p> <blockquote><p>"We wanted to remind people how the soup they love more than any other is full of the stuff they love most," Eric Christianson, business director &mdash; Campbell's condensed soups, said in a statement. "Our TV commercial, 'Slurp,' as well as our print ads, use the billboard and giant noodle imagery to drive home the value we offer in each can. It just made sense to bring that same idea to life with a real billboard above one of the busiest intersections in the world."</p></blockquote> <p>Campbell's estimates 1.5 million people will see the billboard over the next four weeks. Its 2009 soup season campaign is titled "Slurp," which sounds sort of gross and certainly lacks the smoothness of Don Draper's "Toasted" cigarette ad push.</p> <p><a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=140017">Campbell Wants to Show You Just How Long Its Noodles Are</a> [AdvertisingAge]<br /> (Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/edstern/3922210158/">edEx</a>)<br /> <i>(Thanks, NORMLgirl!)</i></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398431/campbells-brags-about-its-noodle-length]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398431</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ But what about the girth? ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Advertising ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Billboards ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ campbell's ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Noodles ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Soup ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:47:53 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Phil Villarreal</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398431&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ How To Make Your PS3 Stream Netflix [Netflix Streaming] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/netflix.jpg" width="158" height="135" />Netflix isn't dragging its feet as it sets up its <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ondemand" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ondemand" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/ondemand/">on demand</a> streaming service on the PlayStation 3. After announcing the feature <a href="http://consumerist.com/5389921/netflix-streaming-coming-to-ps3-in-november">last week</a>, Netflix has started sending out discs that let PS3 owners with Netflix subscriptions partake in the streaming.</p> <p>If you've got a Netflix subscription and a PS3, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/11/05/psa-netflix-ps3-discs-begin-shipping-today/">click on this link</a> and Netflix will get a disc out to you for free. There's no need to prove you've got a PS3. Netflix trusts you. </p> <p>Sometime next year you'll be able to download a PS3 program that does away with the need for the disc, so at that point you'll be able to try and sell it on eBay to stupid people.</p> <p><a href="http://www.netflix.com/InstantStreamingDisc">Instant Streaming Disc</a> [Netflix, via <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/11/05/psa-netflix-ps3-discs-begin-shipping-today/">Joystiq</a>]<br /> (Photo: Netflix)</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398398/how-to-make-your-ps3-stream-netflix]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398398</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Netflix streaming ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ DVDs ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Movies ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ NetFlix ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ On Demand ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ PS3 ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Sony ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:39:11 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Phil Villarreal</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398398&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ PerfectPitch Owner Apologizes For DMCA Notice, Explains What Happened [Follow Ups] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/110509-006-perfectpitch-wants-to-hug.jpg" width="160" height="160" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" />Gary Boucherle, the owner of the website and product PerfectPitch, sent us an explanation of why he got Google to <a href="http://consumerist.com/5398105/perfectpitch-uses-dmca-to-get-product-mentions-removed-from-google">remove links to mentions of his product</a> on another person's blog.</p> <p>The short version: Jeremy Keith's blog was accidentally lumped into a list of blogs being reported to Google for mentioning pirate copies of PerfectPitch, and Boucherle apologizes for the mistake.</p> <p>Here's what he sent us (I've added the links):</p> <blockquote> <p><b>Official Statement from PerfectPitch.com</b></p> <p>Re: Google DMCA Removal of a Blog Page</p> <p>To All Readers:</p> <p>Here at PerfectPitch.com we made a big mistake.</p> <p>We instructed Google <a href="http://adactio.com/journal/1623">to block a blog site managed by Jeremy Keith</a>, citing that they were in violation of the Digital Millennium Copyrights Act (DMCA). As per our request, Google did indeed remove this page from their search listings.</p> <p>We wish to formally apologize to Mr. Keith and his bloggers for this mistake, for which we are deeply regretful.</p> <p>Please understand that we had no intention whatsoever to suppress the speech on Mr. Keith's page. Please know that we are ardent supporters and advocates of free speech for everyone.</p> <p>We recognize this was a careless error, and there is really no excuse for this. Nevertheless, please permit us a moment to explain.</p> <p>Here's what happened:</p> <p>We were actually submitting to Google a list of sites that were illegally distributing copies of our copyrighted intellectual property. We of course have every right to request that Google have these sites removed from their search engine results because we believe these sites violate the DMCA, which prohibits the illegal distribution of copyrighted materials over the internet.</p> <p>To our shock and horror, an employee of ours mistakenly included Mr. Keith's site in our list, merely because it made a reference to illegal copies of our course. Naturally, this is not grounds for removal of this page at Google. Our intention was only to remove actual pages where the course is being illegally distributed, and not any pages of free speech, such as Mr. Keith's blog. This was a misjudgment and error on our employee's side, and on behalf of our company, we sincerely apologize.</p> <p>This event has never happened to us before when reporting illegal distribution of our materials. Please rest assured that we will redouble our efforts to ensure this never happens again.</p> <p>We have requested that Google immediately reinstate this page in their search results, along with our apology to Google as well.</p> <p>Again, please accept our sincere regrets for this goof.</p> <p>Happy blogging, everyone.</p> <p>Sincerely yours,<br /> Gary Boucherle<br /> <a href="http://www.perfectpitch.com/">PerfectPitch.com</a></p></blockquote> <p>Keith over at Adactio has <a href="http://adactio.com/journal/1624/">posted a follow-up report</a>, which includes part of another email from Boucherle that explains what happened in greater detail</p> <blockquote> <p>Periodically we've contacted Google to submit the following complaint:</p> <div style="margin-left: 80px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 15px 15px 18px 15px; background-color: #fff; width: 480px;"> <p><i>We believe our copyrighted works have been illegally copied and made available for free download at the web sites listed below</i></div> <p>The following URL was one of hundreds of URLS (mostly torrent sites) found with the Google search terms <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=Burge+Pitch+Torrent">Burge+Pitch+Torrent</a>:</p> <p><a href="http://www.thesession.org/discussions/display/21250">http://www.thesession.org/discussions/display/21250</a></p> <p>While we try to check every URL to make sure it either contains torrents, or is a torrent file sharing site (not the case with this site), it was included with our complaint inadvertently.</p></blockquote> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/110509-006-no-hug-for-you.jpg" width="160" height="160" class="left" />Keith says he then had a phone call with Boucherle where they discussed things like takedown notices and using the DMCA to protect your copyright, and how it can blow up in the aggressor's face if used incorrectly: </p> <blockquote> <p>I subsequently had a phone conversation with Gary and he was quite contrite about his actions&mdash;although he did try to claim that the mere mention of torrents in an online discussion might be justification for a take down (a completely indefensible attitude).</p> <p>The more I talked to him, the more I realised that he simply had no idea about the DMCA. He was completely oblivious to the potential consequences of his actions were he to <a href="http://www.eff.org/cases/online-policy-group-v-diebold">lose a counter-claim in court</a>.</p> <p>Gary Bourcherle abused a piece of extremely poor legislation in a scattergun approach without even understanding what he was doing.</p></blockquote> <p>About that counter-claim example: Diebold was <a href="http://www.eff.org/cases/online-policy-group-v-diebold">found to have violated section 512(f) of the DMCA</a>, and ordered to pay $125,000 in damages and fees&mdash;which is something you may want to point out to anyone who misuses the DMCA against your own online content in the future.</p> <p><a href="http://adactio.com/journal/1624/">"Burge Pitch Torrent "</a> [Adactio]</p> <p>RELATED<br /> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5392839/how-to-protect-yourself-from-takedown-notices">"How To Protect Yourself From Takedown Notices"</a><br /> (Meerkat illustrations of how to reject a hug: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/valeriebb/2341856176/">Valerie</a> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/valeriebb/2341022735/in/set-72157594372687670/">Everett</a>)</p> </p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398633/perfectpitch-owner-apologizes-for-dmca-notice-explains-what-happened]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398633</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Follow ups ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ abuse ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Apologies ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Boucherle ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Copyfraud ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Diebold ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ dmca ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ explanations ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Legal bullying ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ perfect pitch ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ PerfectPitch ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Streisand effect ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ takedown ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:28:52 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Chris Walters</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398633&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Morning Deals [Sales] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/110609-000-pumajacket.jpg" width="160" height="213" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" /><ul><strong>Automobiles</strong><li><a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/accutire-ms-6013-mechanical-tire-gauge-with-backlit-dial-gauge-set-point-0-60-psi">Buy.com</a>: [Tire Gauge] Accutire Mechanical Tire Gauge w/ Backlight & Set-point $11 + free shipping</li><br /><strong>Clothing</strong><li><a href="http://www.techbargains.com/news_displayItem.cfm/184006">American Eagle Outfitters</a>: [Apparel] American Eagle Outfitters Coupon Code 15% off Sitewide w/ PayPal</li><li><a href="http://www.techbargains.com/news_displayItem.cfm/184018">Banana Republic</a>: [Apparel] New Banana Republic Coupon Code 25% off $100+</li><li><a href="http://www.buxr.com/deal/puma-friends-family-30-off-your-purchases-online-in-store_37061">Puma </a>: [First Class Running Suits] 30% Off Entire Online Purchase or 20% Off In-Store Purchase w/ Coupon <b>FANDF0911</b> + Printable</li></ul></p> <p><ul><strong>Computers and Electronics</strong><li><a href="http://www.techbargains.com/news_displayItem.cfm/184028">Epson Store</a>: [Printers] Epson Store Coupon Code $5-$50 off (Epson Artisan 800 All-in-One Printer w/ Wifi, Duplex $119.99)</li><li><a href="http://www.dealhack.com/archives/2009/11/get_a_free_tivo_hd_xl_dvr_with.html">OneCall</a>: [HDTVs] Get a Free TiVo HD XL DVR with select Samsung HDTVs</li><li><a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/kodak-easyshare-v1073-10mp-digital-camera">Amazon</a>: [Digital Camera] Kodak EasyShare V1073 10MP Camera $120 + free shipping</li><br /><li><a href="http://www.buxr.com/deal/compaq-q2009-20-widescreen-lcd-monitor-refurbished_37114">Buy.com </a>: [Monitor] Compaq 20'' Widescreen LCD Monitor (Refurbished) for $109.99 w/ Free Shipping</li><li><a href="http://www.buxr.com/deal/lg-hbm-760-bluetooth-headset-bulk-oem_37150">Newegg </a>: [Headset] LG Bluetooth Headset for $13.99 w/ Free Shipping</li><li><a href="http://www.buxr.com/deal/kodak-easyshare-c180-10mp-digital-camera-55-free-prints-from-shutterfly_37118">Amazon </a>: [Digital Camera] Kodak EasyShare 10MP Digital Camera + 55 Free Prints From Shutterfly for $69.99 w/ Free Shipping</li><br /><strong>Entertainment</strong><li><a href="http://www.destructoid.com/black-friday-get-free-lego-rock-band-at-old-navy-154211.phtml">Old Navy</a>: [Video Games] Free LEGO Rock Band video game with $20 purchase while supplies last, November 27th only (Black Friday)</li><li><a href="http://www.buxr.com/deal/national-geographic-magazine-1-year-subscription_37071">Amazon </a>: [Magazine] National Geographic Magazine 1-Year Subscription for $10</li><li><a href="http://www.buxr.com/deal/the-beatles-rock-band-special-value-edition_37087">Amazon </a>: [Game] The Beatles Rock Band Value Edition for $99.99 w/ Free Shipping</li><br /><li><a href="http://www.buxr.com/deal/the-greatest-american-hero-the-complete-series-w-bonus-cape-instruction-manual_37123">Amazon </a>: [TV Series] The Greatest American Hero - The Complete Series w/ Bonus Cape + Instruction Manual for $65.99 w/ Free Shipping</li><li><a href="http://dealnews.com/DVD-preorders-at-Walmart-for-10-free-shipping-Star-Trek-Harry-Potter-more/327794.html?ref=consumerist">Walmart</a>: [DVDs] DVD preorders at Walmart for $10 + free shipping: Star Trek, Harry Potter, more</li><br /><strong>Food</strong><li><a href="http://www.buxr.com/deal/75-cents-off-silk-soymilk-lactose-free-coupon-silk-soymilk_37063">Silk </a>: [Grocery] 75 Cents Off Silk Soymilk w/ Coupon - Printable</li><li><a href="http://www.buxr.com/deal/cheesecake-factory-5-off-10-cheesecake-online-only_37049">The Cheesecake Factory </a>: [Food] $5 Off 10" Cheesecake w/ Coupon <b>CAKE5</b></li><br /><strong>Office Supplies</strong><li><a href="http://dealnews.com/1-000-Full-Color-Custom-Business-Cards-for-3-free-shipping/327904.html?ref=consumerist">OfficeDepot</a>: [Office Supplies] 1,000 Full-Color Custom Business Cards for $3 + free shipping</li><br /><strong>Toys</strong><li><a href="http://www.techbargains.com/news_displayItem.cfm/184054">Walmart</a>: [Toys] LeapFrog Learn & Groove Musical Table (blue or pink) $19</li><br /><strong>Travel</strong><li><a href="http://dealnews.com/United-Airlines-round-trip-flights-from-103-via-Travelocity/327930.html?ref=consumerist">Travelocity</a>: [Airfare] United Airlines round-trip flights from $103 via Travelocity</li><li><a href="http://dealnews.com/Travelocity-deals-Virgin-America-1-way-flights-from-49-more/327938.html?ref=consumerist">Travelocity</a>: [Vacations] Travelocity deals: Virgin America 1-way flights from $49, more</li></ul></p> <p><em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #morningdeals" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #morningdeals" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/morningdeals/">Morning Deals</a> are purely an informational service for the readers. Consumerist receives nothing in exchange for their posting.<br /> If you have a tip for Morning Deals, send it to tips@consumerist.com, and be sure to put "morning deals" in the subject line.</em></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398640/morning-deals]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398640</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Sales ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Morning Deals ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Shopping ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:06:38 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Chris Walters</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398640&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Borders To Close 200 Bookstores [Rightsizing] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/11/bordersbooks.jpg" width="158" height="143" />Borders announced that 200 of their stores will be, in the words of their CEO, "right-sized" by January. The shredding focuses on Waldenbooks, Borders Express and Borders Outlet stores, mainly those in malls and airports. We kinda saw this coming.</p> <p>Back in March we reported two tips. <a href="http://consumerist.com/5181121/is-borders-shrinking-its-cd-and-dvd-sections">One was</a> from a Borders employee who said they were getting rid of the CD and DVD sections in some stores. <a href="http://consumerist.com/5183629/is-borders-about-to-go-under">The other</a> was from the owner of a small music label who said his distributor had cut off shipments to Borders once for nonpayment and that the labels would have to agree to not hold the distributor "liable on any future shipments to Borders in case they file for bankruptcy."</p> <p>So, while that was an overstatement it was clear they were in some kind of trouble. Anyway, kind of sad. I like books.</p> <p><a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6705797.html?desc=topstory">Borders to Close 200 Walden Outlets in January</a> [Publishers Weekly] (Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/infrogmation/3102665080/">Infrogmation</a>) <em>(Thanks to Meg!)</em></p> <p>PREVIOUSLY: <a href="http://consumerist.com/5183629/is-borders-about-to-go-under">Is Borders About To Go Under?</a><br /> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5181121/is-borders-shrinking-its-cd-and-dvd-sections">Is Borders Shrinking Its CD And DVD Sections?</a><br /> <a href="http://consumerist.com/5123707/#viewcomments">Borders' has fired their CEO and replaced him with an Amazon Kindle</a></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/5398632/borders-to-close-200-bookstores]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">Consumerist-5398632</guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ rightsizing ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Books ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Borders ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Malls ]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ Readers ]]></category>			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:53:27 EST</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ben Popken</dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398632&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
    
			</channel>
</rss>