Kodak: Your Camera Has A Beach Mode, So Don't Take It To The Beach
Digital Cameras

Kodak: Your Camera Has A Beach Mode, So Don't Take It To The Beach

Depressed Lady Loses Benefits Because Of Her Facebook Photos
Facebook

Depressed Lady Loses Benefits Because Of Her Facebook Photos

Smoking Near Apple Computers Creates Biohazard, Voids Warranty
Smoke gets in your imac

Smoking Near Apple Computers Creates Biohazard, Voids Warranty

The Most Alarmingly Typical Best Buy TV Buying Experience Ever
I've Seen Better Buys Actually

The Most Alarmingly Typical Best Buy TV Buying Experience Ever

Walmart Won't Let Family Print Photos Of Dead Relative For Funeral
Be a F%&ing Person

Walmart Won't Let Family Print Photos Of Dead Relative For Funeral

AT&T Rep Wants To Die
Funny

AT&T Rep Wants To Die

Consumerist

  • Display
    • All
    • Top
    • Scams
    • Economy
  • Most recent
    • Most recent
    • Most popular
    • Most discussed
    Username:
    Password:
    loading comment page
    forgot password?
    More top stories »
    Consumerist
    • « next »
      Menu Labeling Controversy

      California Assembly Passes Menu Labeling Legislation

      By Meg Marco, 10:42 AM on Tue Sep 11 2007, 2,582 views

      The California Assembly has passed legislation that will require chain outlets with 15 or more locations to place calorie info on fast food menu boards and nutrition information on restaurant menus. The rule applies only to standard menu items and not to daily specials or custom orders.

      The legislation is similar to controversial regulations in New York City and King County, Washington, but if Governor Schwarzenegger signs this bill, California will be the first state to make nutrition information on menu boards a requirement.

      The Center for Science in the Public Interest is happy about the bill:

      "Without nutrition information at the point of decision-making in chain restaurants, it's hard for people to make informed choices for themselves and their children," said Margo G. Wootan, director of nutrition policy at CSPI. "Who would expect that some coffee drinks at Starbucks have more calories than a Big Mac, or that a tuna salad sub from Subway has more calories than a roast beef sub?"
      It's a good question, Margo. Until the CSPI made a mock-up of the Starbucks menu board, we really had no idea that a Venti Vanilla Bean Frappucino had 600 calories. A Big Mac has 540.

      California Legislature Passes Historic Menu Labeling Bill [CSPI]
      (Photo:CSPI)

      PREVIOUSLY: Seattle To Require Calorie Labeling At Chain Restaurants, Cut Trans Fat
      Subway Is Not Ashamed: First Fast Food Restaurant To Put Calorie Info On Menus
      NYC Restaurant Group Sues Over Nutritional Info Regulation

      Read More: Menu Labeling Controversy, California, Starbucks, McDonalds, nutrition information

      Loading comments ...

    New York, 11:34 PM
    Sun Nov 22
    7 posts in the last 24 hours

    Consumerist team

    Tip Your Editors:
    tips@consumerist.com
    tipline: 347-42C-ON95

    Co-Managing Editor:
    Ben Popken
    Email | AIM | Twitter

    Co-Managing Editor:
    Meghann Marco
    Email | Twitter

    Senior Editor:
    Chris Walters
    Email | Twitter

    Weekend Editor:
    Laura Northrup
    Email | AIM | Twitter

    Associate Editor:
    Alex Chasick | Email

    Associate Editor:
    Phil Villarreal
    Email

    Comments Moderator:
    Email | AIM

    SUBSCRIBE TO Consumerist RSS

    Latest News from Consumer Reports

    • Archives
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • User Agreement
    • Help
    • Contact Us

    © 2005-2009 Consumer Media LLC