Hmm....since it usually takes 5 seconds to check a receipt, why in the world would you refuse? To prove a point? And what point would that be, anyway? That it's easy to annoy everyone else behind you in line? That you can be a jerk to people who have no control over what they've been directed to do by their company? In my experience, stores only do this when they're having problems with shoplifters. So why cause the poor hourly employees even more angst by acting like an ass about it?

since it usually takes 5 seconds to check a receipt, why in the world would you refuse? To prove a point?

You've obviously never been to Fry's Electronics, where the obligatory receipt check takes longer, and when on a Saturday afternoon, there may be thirty people stacked up at the overworked dimwit checking receipts. Checkout and returns at Fry's take long enough; why should I take even more of my time to help them police loss prevention?

Plus, it's insulting. After spending several hundred dollars on one or two items, I'm not going to stop and waste more of my time waiting for someone to verify the number and types of items in the bag I walked all of fifty feet from the cash register with. The checkouts are all partitioned from high-dollar items like electronics in these stores anyway.

At Fry's my usual response is to avoid eye contact and walk right past the receipt checker. In one case, when he physically blocked my exit, I asked "am I suspected of something?", and he waved me by.

I agree that one shouldn't act like a total ass, but neither should honest consumers be harassed and treated like suspected thieves.

I don't make a big scene, but I do just keep going through the door, unless the employee is blocking it. If the employee starts to freak out and try to stop me, I say, "I'm sorry, but after I purchased these items, they belong to me, and so does my receipt and my bag. You have dozens of cameras, a team of trained security professionals, and your cashier witnessed me purchasing all of these items. Now, I'll thank you to please step aside and allow me through, unless spending money in your store is a crime."

I don't blame the employees, but some points need to be made. Good customer service should be a huge priority for any store, and harassing the people who keep your company in business is despicable.

I do not allow bag/receipt checks, ever. yes, it's to make a point- the point that I won't be lined up and searched because I don't live in East Germany. I've been hassled twice in several years' time, and both time the employees who tried it got in trouble when their respective bosses caught on.

Nobody has a right to detain and search you unless, just like the cops, they have probable cause- and if they don't, you can sue the pants off 'em, which Walmart (among others) has learned after trying it onn the wrong perswon. IOW, they can ask, and you can refuse- and if they insist, touch you, or detain you, consider it your Christmas bonus.

Honestly though...although it might be hassle and quite annoying at times, i kind of agree with Elara. It is their job to do and giving them grief for it only complicates the situation. Put yourself in the receipt checker's shoes-how would you feel if you were obligated to do this as a job requirement and every person who passed by you made a big deal out of it? i mean granted, in some big box stores like walmart, you can get by the receipt checker without so much as a glance, but there are some stores that are quite adamant about checking receipts.

If you think the suspicion of consumers stealing is bad, try working at Wal-Mart. I used to (*shudder* I feel so dirty and ashamed) and once had car trouble. My mom picked me up and parked on the general merchandise (GM) side instead of the grocery side, which is where employees were supposed to enter/exit. (She wanted to shop while she waited for me to get off work.) My manager saw me and I got interrogated, saying it was awfully suspicious for me to go out the GM side, and it looked like I had something to hide. That was in addition to the regular bag/lunchbox search (which was more of a glance than a search.)

since it usually takes 5 seconds to check a receipt, why in the world would you refuse?

I just paid for my goods at the cash register, the place where a higher than usual concentration of store security observation takes place. They know what I did, they have it on tape, along with my name from my credit or debit card. When I get to the front door the register tape check is an implication that, in spite of all this observation, the default assumption is that I'm trying to steal from them. I resent that assumption and I do not participate.

To prove a point?

Yes.

And what point would that be, anyway?

That this paying customer doesn't appreciate being treated like a suspected shoplifter.

In my experience, stores only do this when they're having problems with shoplifters.

Not my problem. I paid.

I've had a few friends that worked at the local Fry's tell me that LP busted a scam by some cage workers where they'd swap out a lower-spec CPU than the one that was on the quote. They caught it when they were checking a customer's bag and the CPU didn't match what was on the receipt.

Now, if LP hadn't checked, the customer would likely be stuck with the lower-spec CPU. If the customer tried to return the CPU, there'd be no way to tell who was scamming who, and they'd likely deny the return.

I don't find the receipt checking to be any different than Microsoft's Activation scheme -- both highly annoying and intrusive, and they're only going to affect honest, non-stealing people. Pirates and real shoplifters (the ones who steal more than a pack of gum) are going to know how the systems work and ways around it.

I'm willing to bet that a paid plain-clothes security guard or two would be FAR more effective than the idiot up front checking receipts.

As far as Fry's / Best Buy / etc., I'm not sure why people shop there anymore. Their prices aren't good, staff are often immature/untrained/unknowledgable, and the whole transaction is generally a pain in the ass. Don't get me started on them asking for my ID when I'm using a credit card (a big no-no with Visa/MC). The less service I receive in the retail stores, the more I'm liking online shopping.

//Side rant: Are the any good (sub)contractors anymore? The previous owner of my house hired some hack to replace the heat pump and in doing so, totally botched the install. I've called 9 contractors, telling all of them that I wanted to rip everything out and start from scratch and "money is no object." Out of those 9:

Only 7 of them actually bothered to show up. (You'd think the "money no object" line would have at least gotten them to show up)
Only 5 of them submitted quotes.
Only 2 of those quotes followed my specifications
Only 2 of the contractors bothered to go into the attic and look at the installation to see the extent of the damage and what a new system install would entail. Unfortunately, one of these two didn't submit a quote.
Only 1 of them actually understood how to do air con in Florida (humidity levels are the key, NOT temperature control in muggy but temperate Florida).

Man, you people are rather noble. I just walk right past the receipt checkers for the sole reason that I want them to stop me. I've done my fair share of research on the topic and I'm confident that I know my rights to this issue. I want someone to challenge those rights so I can actually show my knowledge on the issue.

Basically, I want them to stop me (physically or otherwise) so that I can blabber a bit at their boss about the immorality of the situation. No such luck so far :(

The check at the door is to make sure you aren't in cahoots with the guy working the register (i.e. having him scan a couple low priced items while you walk out with the expensive stuff). Still, I'm not going to waste my time helping them catch shitty employees.

This really annoys me as well.

A few months ago, at a local CompUSA store, it was dead inside, I was the only customer at the registers, purchased only one fairly large item, the door checker watched me do it and pay for it, and still insisted on checking my receipt.

Sometimes I wonder if it's more to check the honesty of the cashiers than the general public.

In my retail experience, the receipt checks (while originally intended to check for theft) really ended up being a check for incompetence by the cashiers. Often the wrong things get punched up, people get charged wrong, and mistakes are made.

It's not there for preventing purposeful theft, but instead accidental mistakes which can cost the store money. It's not about treating people like criminals, but instead treating their own employees like morons... which is sadly often the case.

I don't play that game at all. They always want to check my receipt at Home Depot and I have always refused. Once an overzealous rent-a-cop followed me out to my car(a distance of 300 feet from door to car) and demanded I show him my receipt for the 2 dollar wooden dowel I just purchased. I told him to f..k himself and get the hell back in the store before I beat his ass.
Man, Black friday has made me an angry man today.

Those receipt checks are there to stop theft by the cashiers against the store. They prevent the cashier's buddy from coming it, bringing thousands of dollars of merchandise to the counter, paying twenty dollars for the only thing they bothered scanning, and then walking out the door.

So, yeah, don't stop if you don't want to.

I've had a real off duty police officer (who was hired part time) as store security repeatedly slam my car door shut as I attempted to leave at a Brandsmart in Doraville, GA. They had three other security guards around the car (who weren't identified as cops) after I walked past the checker station.

They repeatedly ignored me inside while I was trying to get a couple pieces of merchandise (a usb to 802.11b dongle) which had pissed me off enough to not bother and to just checkout with the random crap I had.

I ended up buying a pot and a floor fan. If I didn't have people coming over in an hour and a half, I would have risked arrest for the payday for this detention (25 minutes I believe).

--Michael

Why do people immediately assume that companies are out to treat them like criminals and morons, rather than maybe, just maybe, the companies are trying to solve a problem in the least intrusive manner possible?

Shoplifting is a major problem for any store. Check-out clerks are not infallible and are sometimes dishonest, especially where high-ticket items can be very small and easily hidden. Sometimes, honest mistakes are made (i.e., something you bought didn't get put into your bag). In less than 10 seconds, the store is reducing theft (which helps keep prices lower) and helping to avoid mistakes.

Yes, if can be annoying, but, big deal. Is your life soooo important that a delay of a few seconds is going to ruin your day?

Yes, if you want, you can just march right past these people and they cannot stop you -- that is your right. But why? Why go out of your way to antagonize people? Because you can? Wow. You people who get so bent out of shape by something so minor as this, which is, in part, to assist you, must lead very sad lives where you are looking at every slight as a personal insult. You are the type of people who always assume the worst motives in other people and assume everyone is out to screw you, and then cannot figure out why the world isn't more friendly.

The whole "check your receipt" thing is extremely annoying, and yet, not a big enough deal for me to care enough to go running out the door to see how many rent-a-cops will follow me. I pick my battles and while I find it slightly annoying, it's not enough for me to make a huge deal about it.

I have noticed at the local Best Buy, the guy sitting at the entrance purposefully makes eye contact with you and says hello. Not because he's being nice, but because somewhere buried in shoplifting research, there's a paragraph that says once people have been recognized and acknowledged by store staff, they're less apt to shoplift.

I agree...it's a pain in the ass, but I don't feel like challenging it every time I go in there. So, if you're listening, Best Buy, that's one of the reasons I shop online. I only go into Best Buy if I have no other choice. Maybe I'll just stop going in altogether.

If the purpose of the "check your receipt" guy is truly to prevent cashier fraud, then maybe they should explain that. People are a lot more understanding if they understand that there's another purpose for a certain procedure other than the store thinking their own loyal paying customers are thieves.

Don't get me started on them asking for my ID when I'm using a credit card (a big no-no with Visa/MC).

I can never understand why anybody would have a problem with an employee checking an ID for a credit card purchase. It's not a "no-no", it's how stores cover their asses and prevent problems for customers. Checking an ID for a non-signed card (which, on the back of the card it clearly states that the card is not valid unless signed) or checking an ID when a a signature does not match is how stores prevent fraud.

I hope that stores ask for my ID because it makes me hope that if my credit card ever did get stolen, they thief would not be able to make purchases with my card.

Back to the topic and hand, though, in Circuit City in Virginia, they were very strict about retaining people. Basically the rule was that you had to see a person take an item, conceal it, keep them in view the entire time they have the item on them (so you know that they couldn't have put it down), and then you have to witness them pass the last point of sale terminal towards the exit. Only if all of those conditions are met can a person be stopped.

The risk of being sued is greater than the cost of the item being stolen, in most cases.

Oh, please. Spare us the "it's for your own protection!" company line. That one is a real knee-slapper, especially when someone is trying to tell you, with a straight face, that the person armed with the pink magic marker at the door will know if you've been overcharged on any of them 25,000+ items these superstores carry.

My purpose in the store is to buy something. I go to the shelf, I pick out what I want, I go to the cashier, I pay for it. I'm terribly sorry to hear that these stores have a huge problem with theft both external and internal, but it is not my problem nor is it that of the hundreds or thousands of paying customers they see every day. I would venture to say that most of us are somewhat perplexed that our refusal to be treated like thieves on our way to the parking lot would "antagonize" anyone but the basest of control freaks who view customer = enemy.

If you refuse to show your receipt at Best Buy they have a right to suspect something is up. Same when a police officer wants to search your car and you tell him no. You can do that, but don't expect them to say "ok" and let you go.

At Target we have a poster that says "It takes 5 GPS units to make up for the loss of 1". If you set off the detector on your way out, security has every right to make sure you're not hiding something in that luggage you just bought. Theft is a big problem in retail stores. What's stopping you from having a friend ring you up for only half your merchandise? If you have a problem with receipt checks, blame everyone who's decided to steal before you, not the store. The more a store has lost to theft, the stricter they'll be with receipt checking.

I used to set off the anti-theft alarm every time I left Best Buy. Eventually, I started ignoring it, and I haven't stopped for one since. The worst I've had happen to me is a clerk saying, "Uh, sir?" as I walked away. If they're so concerned about loss prevention, they should invest in a system with fewer false positives.

If the receipt check is meant to thwart thieves, it has a nearly 100% false-positive rate. Most customers are not thieves, and most thieves know how to evade detection. Therefore, the "drag net" is mostly a nuisance to the innocent. I like the "ignore them" approach.

If the purpose of the receipt check is to verify you got everything you paid for, the representative should politely offer (not request) to double-check your purchase for accuracy. It should be phrased in such a way that the most common response is "no thank you". (Of course, they don't check your receipt as a courtesy.)

There are less invasive ways to improve security. These businesses should chose methods that don't leave the impression they presume every customer is a potential criminal. If more people objected to the post-purchase inspection, they'd be forced to come up with something less obnoxious and more effective.

Anyway, I say just ignore them. If you didn't steal anything, you have nothing to worry about. They're better off leaving you alone, rather than risk falsely accusing or detaining you without any actual evidence.

Same when a police officer wants to search your car and you tell him no. You can do that, but don't expect them to say "ok" and let you go.

ElPresidente408, when they ask if they can search your car, they're asking you to waive your Fourth Amendment rights. If you say no, and they don't have probable cause, they absolutely have to say "ok" and let you go. Refusing to waive your rights does not give them probable cause.

If I refuse to show my receipt to Best Buy, they have a choice: accuse me of something, or let me go. If they're going to accuse me of something, they'd better have more proof than me just not feeling like being detained for a receipt check at the door.

Even the cops can't stop you unless they're pretty sure beyond a reasonable doubt that you've done something wrong. It's called "innocent until proven guilty."

Nobody has the right to stop you or detain you or search you. The only time the police can is if they have "probable cause" in other words, they see you doing something wrong or the see contraband on you or someone you're with. If you're not a cop, this rule doesn't apply to you.

It might seem like the people who are against their stuff being checked are acting antagonistically but they're defending their 3rd amendment rights. If we start to give them up routinely at the checkout line then we'll just start taking for granted that we don't have them anymore at all.

The people who set policy for LP departments in retail stores DO see every customer as a potential shoplifter, and that's how they train their people to act as well. This is why they have blanket rules like receipt checking and bag checking at stores. They think everyone who walks in the door could be stealing from them at any given second.

These are the rules that the honest people who actually pay for things and keep the buisness' doors open are upset about.

If a policy sucks and enough people complain about it with their voices and their wallets, the policy will change.

"If you refuse to show your receipt at Best Buy they have a right to suspect something is up. Same when a police officer wants to search your car and you tell him no. You can do that, but don't expect them to say "ok" and let you go."

Ya--- great! So you think that it is reasonable to assume that someone who declines to give permission to have their person or property searched is, therefore, suspicious?

Obviously anyone who the police talk to who decline to speak without a lawyer are guilty---after all, if you have nothing to hide then there's no possible way anything they found or you said could possibly be used against you. /sarcasm

It's that very kind of logic being propagated that puts the government in a position to degrade the rights of honest citizens.

Hey, Elpresidente408. Here's your homework assignment this weekend: watch this video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=852084776135050182...

Yes, they WILL say "OK" and let you go. It's called "probable cause." Because, recent developments aside, we still live in a reasonably free country.

I can't speak for every state, but in Oregon, when they ask to see my receipt, I just say "no thank you". Not once has anyone ever stopped me. Usually they'll just say "okay, have a nice day." They know they're not allowed to do anything.

Similarly (at least in Oregon) they can't even stop you if the security gates go off. According to what I found when researching this, in Oregon, the only reliable way to detain/search someone and not face a losing lawsuit, you have to SEE THEM take something and then not lose sight of them until they leave the store. It's an incredibly high standard. Fred Meyer here actually got sued because they pressured people into believing that they were required by law to stop when a security alarm went off. It's NOT TRUE. If they want you to stop, take off all your clothes, find whatever bullshit thing caused it to beep, make them arrest you. Otherwise, just say no. I once had a pair of jeans that made security gates beep at a few places when I wore them. It was very strange, but I got very tired of dealing with it. So I just stopped.

Time to clean some things up:
Don't get me started on them asking for my ID when I'm using a credit card (a big no-no with Visa/MC).
FLConsumer: As someone who has been the victim of ID theft, and had stolen checks used at Wal-Mart, I am incensed when checkers do not ask for ID. Try spending two days in court (as I have) trying to explain to a DA and an attorney for WM how the signature on the fraudulent check facsimile is not yours. I realize CC companies don't want ID requested, but it's ridiculous not to ask.
infinitysnake: C'mon, there is no East Germany anymore;) (Though there is an east Germany.)
Now, if dishonest cashiers are such a problem for retailers then why aren't the security personnel stationed at the counter? Yes, it would cost a ton of money-- but everyone would be honest then, right???

Regarding the Credit-Card-ID-Check tangent, from the Visa Merchant Rules (PDF):

When should you ask a cardholder for an official government ID?

Although Visa rules do not preclude merchants from asking for cardholder ID, merchants cannot make an ID a condition of acceptance. Therefore, merchants cannot refuse to complete a purchase transaction because a cardholder refuses to provide ID. Visa believes merchants should not ask for ID as part of their regular card acceptance procedures. (p.29)

... kinda like how nothing precludes merchants from asking to see your receipt, but merchants cannot make reviewing your receipt a condition of leaving the store.

The only place I'll really put up with this nonsense is J&R in lower Manhattan, because they have a foolish and unwieldy system of buying merchandise, but have reasonably knowledgable staff and very good prices. The system there does seem more to be about checking for cock-ups than stopping shoplifters, but inconvenience is a slight feature of the J&R experience anyway.

Wow, apparently some of you have had some really bad experiences with this. The worst I've ever had is at Costco, where they look at your receipt, guesstimate how many items you've got, and then check off your receipt and off you go. If someone started acting like I was a criminal, I'd be pissed too. But I've never had anyone be rude or even slightly obnoxious about it. I have no idea what Frye's Electronics is, but it sounds like they're pretty jerky about it.

So, I guess I still don't see an issue with it in most cases. If you don't like the way a company does business, then stop going to that company. If they don't appreciate your business, there's always somewhere else you can go that will.

RE: Receipts
I generally balance out the hassle/courtesy factor when showing receipts--if there is a huge line to get out the door because one employee is taking their time with the receipt checking, I will simply walk out. The only time I've ever been stopped (at Fry's), I told the employee that I "don't allow searches of my personal property" and kept walking.

RE: Credit card ID
I have no problem with showing ID with checks (there is no signature to compare). However, I get really ticked off when cashiers insist upon a photo ID when using my card; I usually don't argue with the cashiers though (unless I can tell that they are managers of some sort). To help remedy this, I got one of those cards with my photo and signature already on it. Now when stores insist on seeing my ID in addition to the photo card, I get beyond angry. My usual policy in those situations is to have the cashier cancel the purchase, and walk out the door. The VAST majority of credit card fraud is electronic, NOT somebody swiping your card and trying to use it at CompUSA. Plus, the two times I had a fraudulent charge on my card, a simple 10-minute call cleared it up.

Fry's is the worst. I was walking out of there with a 34" CRT television (in a huge box) and stand (in another huge box). That's all I had purchased. And, actually, I wasn't walking out of the store with them, the employees helping me bring them to my van had them on dollies right behind me. And the kid at the door STILL asked to check my receipt. I said, "You're kidding me, right?" "No," was his reply. "Store policy."

Idiots.

At the walmart the famdamily went to yesterday, the security bars kept on going off. About every second or third adult walking back out.

Mr. No49 walked through with the older two kids and didn't get dinged just after watching another customer getting interrogated.

Mrs. No49, however, had the bars go off when she and the baby were the only ones going through. But, since LP was busy with the previous dinger, she just kept right on walking. No one stopped her or chased after her. If they had grabbed her, she was going to go straight to the media and tell them off. She had the walmart receipt, not the Mr. So if she was stopped, it would have been unlawful detainment.

But if the bars keep on going off, maybe there's something wrong with the desensitizing thing at the checkouts? That would make more sense than a series of shoplifters.

I do not consent to showing ID as a condition of any sale, and I will assert that at point of sale. If a cashier is suspicious of the transaction, they need to call in a "Code 10" and let the financial lender make the final determination. Infact I had this happen once, they insisted on ID and I refused because it was a condition of the sale. After 30 seconds of stating that this was a violation of the MasterCard International Acceptance Procedures; the supervisor agreed to permit the transaction.

When dealing with goons, it's usually helpful to make the name or policy sound official. Simply stating "this is not allowed" is usually not enough. You must point out the official terminology to sound more informed. Whenever a merchant says "min $10 purchase," I say "Excuse me? That is a clear violation of Visa International's Global Acceptance standard and is considered 'card suppression.'" I've never been forced to present ID or comply to a min amount.

And finally, receipts; I absolutely refuse to show them at all. It is about my rights and I will not renounce my right in the name of a store's LP issues. That is their own issue to deal with.

For me, it's the equivalent of permitting police officers into your home to search due to a neighbor being robbed. The police just want to make sure it wasn't you or that you have any of the stolen goods. Despite not having anything to hide, I would never consent to having my home searched nor my person. It may sound dramatic, but no I will not show my receipt. It's in my bag or wallet.

I never stop for the reciept checkers. Except at costco and only because I agreed to when I joined.

I hope fry's tries to stop me... I would love the payday. I know I am not stealing anything, always check my reciept before I leave the counter, and have no desire to help them catch thieves until they improve customer service.

Fry's is one skanky store. They love to break the law and never want to help you. Returns are a hassle there and the employees never know what they are talking about.

Methinks Baby No49 is shifty-eyed:) The Stewie of Canada, perhaps!
Shall I just add-- here is yet another reason not to shop at Best Buy.

For years I shopped at Costco and fantasized about challenging their request to review my receipt as I exited their store. My imagined responses varied from "Bl*w me……please" to a straight forward "No thank you". Included in my list were the following;

- "Will I be detained if I don't permit you to review my receipt?"
- "I'm sorry; you have already taken up too much of my time. I spent 20 minutes in your check-out line and I am not waiting in another line"
- "I am sorry. My three month old twins are in the back-seat of the Geo. I was here much longer then I had planned on today" (Phoenix gets warm at times. Downside is they might really call the police).
- Bypassing the line completely, walking past everyone in line and ignoring the receipt checkers.

Last Valentines Day, I found myself at Costco picking over the fresh cut flowers in a last minute attempt to squeak by another year without making elaborate and romantic plans for the evening. After spending 15 minutes in the check-out line behind an unshaven gypsy-type who frenetically challenged every price on every item in her cart, it was my turn to pay. I paid quickly (cash) and made it towards the exit.

To my dismay I found no fewer then 14 customers in line while two disheveled Costco employees checked receipts. As I got closer to the front of the line I could hear one of the employees commenting on the merits of customers purchases and polling the men about their plans that evening with their "Valentine". The second receipt checker had a bit of a palsy and wasn't quite up to moving merchandise from side to side in the cart, she feigned tallying the merchandise and weakly scribbled a check on the receipt. She sent each customer out the door with the admonition to have a "Blessed Day!"

This wait was becoming way too much for me. I had enough guilt and self-loathing in me at that moment (for buying roses from Costco and failing to make any plans for the evening) that I was able to re-direct my anger towards Costco, their fascist policies and their absurd hiring practices. I skipped the line and purposely headed for the door, holding my receipt in front of me. As I got toward the door I was warned by the more cogent of the two employees that I must wait in line like everyone else. I disagreed and told her "I had already paid and I wasn't going to wait any longer". As I left I heard vague disagreement from people still standing in line and heard the receipt checker yell something about the police and customer service.

I had parked a considerable distance from the store and quickly headed towards my car. As I got to my car I popped the trunk and set the flowers inside the trunk. As I turned around I found myself face to face with a giantess who had some type of a Supervisor title on her name tag. She told me I had to come back and get in line to have my receipt checked. I told her that I didn't have to and asked to move because I was getting into my car and driving away. She then demanded to see my Costco membership card and my receipt. I told her I wasn't going to show her either and again told her I was leaving. She then stated I had agreed to show my receipt whenever (while shopping at Costco) asked when initially I signed up for a membership. I told her I hadn't agreed to that and she should check my application. She then told me my Costco membership was revoked and asked my name. I again told her I was leaving and asked her to move aside. She then got on her radio and asked for another type of supervisor to assist her. I took the opportunity to slowly back-up and leave the parking lot.

Not much of a story but a true experience. I still wonder if I agreed to show my receipt when asked by a Costco employee as a condition of my membership. I spoke with a judge friend of mine who made a vague reference to a law in Arizona which allows retailers to detain individuals until the police show up. He stated the way the law is written the retailers can basically hold you against your will and they are not guilt of false imprisonment. (He said it is pretty simple to get a law passed in Arizona and the retailers lobbied for this law several years ago). I haven't verified this either.

My membership was never revoked, I still shop at Costco and I haven't broke line and headed towards the door since Valentines Day. I have had my thrill and I actually fear getting smacked down by my wife if I try such a daring stunt in her presence.

On the Credit Card ID tangent-

I absolutely agree that I should not necessarily need an ID to use a proprly activated and signed credit card. However, it seems to be common sense to me that if a card is unsigned, and the customer refusesto show ID, the retailer has every right to reject the sale (regardless of how the merchant terms are written), because the card "is not valid" without a signature. I.E., the signature is a condition of acceptance.

Methinks Baby No49 is shifty-eyed:) The Stewie of Canada, perhaps!
Wrong sex. That would be Boy49 (age 4). Girl49 is 2. Baby is a month old.