Consumerist
-
arbitration
Mandatory Binding Arbitration Still Sucks
BusinessWeek has published a pretty substantial cover story on arbitration, and why it disadvantages consumers. Consumerist readers will be familiar with many of the story's criticisms: one study finds 99.8% of arbitration cases are decided in the corporation's favor, some arbitration firms market themselves to companies as a sympathetic and partial judge, the arbitration process is intentionally structured to handicap consumers, and more. More » -
survey says
81% Of Americans Hate Mandatory Binding Arbitration
According to science, even the President is more popular than mandatory binding arbitration. A recent poll shows that Americans hate everything about the extrajudicial resolution system, from its inescapable omnipresence, to its unappealable decisions that rob consumers of their day in court. The poll provides a refreshing contrast to a different study commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which found that Americans love mandatory binding arbitration more than pie. More » -
disputes
If You Happen To Prevail In Arbitration, Get Ready To Lose On Appeal
Arbitration is even worse than we thought. We already knew that consumers lost 94% of the extra-judicial proceedings, but new data shows that the few who manage prevail are likely to have their wins overturned on appeal. More » -
arbitration
Supreme Court Sends "Judge Alex" Back To Arbitration
TV's "Judge Alex" is probably less a fan of arbitration that you'd think, according to CNN. He's been handed a Supreme Court decision that forces him back into the waiting arms of the American Arbitration Association.
The 8-1 decision came in a lawsuit by Alex E. Ferrer, a former Florida Circuit Court judge who decides minor civil disputes as a form of TV entertainment.
More » -
news from the swamp
Liveblogging The Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing On The Arbitration Fairness Act
Join us at 9:30 as we liveblog the Arbitration Fairness Act's second hearing before Congress. Arbitration is an extrajudicial jury-free way to resolve disputes where decisions are handed down by arbitrators who rule against consumers in 98.4% of cases. The Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution will be considering S. 1782, an Act to banish mandatory binding arbitration from consumer disputes.
An October hearing on companion legislation in the House Judiciary Committee quickly devolved into a sob story, with three consumers sharing in horrifying detail how arbitration left them financially ruined. Today's hearing will be comparatively sedate, featuring one panel of academics and lawyers.
Join us at 9:30 as the professionals slice and dice the wonderful and evil qualities of the most anti-consumer practice allowed by law—for now.
(Photo: xsparrowx)
9:32: Video Link - Constitution Subcommittee hearing to examine S. 1782, to amend Chapter 1 of Title 9 of the United States Code with respect to arbitration. Coverage begins momentarily. Oh Congress, you could de-sass anything.
9:34: Here we go. Senator Feingold (D-WI) is chairing the hearing, already decrying our lost right to jury trials. More »
9:25 AM on Wed Dec 12 2007
By Carey
3,888 views, 13 commentsLatest by CSchnack: Would also add that some of the arbitration clauses are not in anything you can read or sign before purchase. more »
-
The Arbitration Fairness Act is set to take a giant leap forward this Thursday. Rep. Henry Johnson (D-GA), sponsor of the House version, H.R. 3010, has convinced the chair of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law to hold a hearing. [House Judiciary Committee]
-
-
consumer action
Why You Should Support The Arbitration Fairness Act
A glimmer of hope has opened up for consumers concerned about entire industries systemic and wholesale stripping of their right to resolve disputes by trial rather than by arbitration firms whose fancypants are bought and paid for by the corporations they're umpiring. This ray is The Arbitration Fairness Act, and as introduced in the Senate by Feingold, Russell D. [WI], the part the bill that applies to you says:
No predispute arbitration agreement shall be valid or enforceable if it requires arbitration of...a consumer dispute.
More »
- 1
1-7 of 7 for "arbitration fairness act"
