Migraine? Try A Big Old Dose Of Aspirin

Commented by Carey Alexander:
12:18 AM on April 23, 2010

Wait a minute... a placebo tricked 32 percent of people into feeling "mild or better?" That's pretty impressive. 100 mg of Imitrex barely tricks me into feeling only "moderately suicidal."

A Farewell To Careys

Commented by Carey Alexander:
11:53 PM on August 11, 2009

Aw, thanks everyone! I'm sad to leave. It's hard to believe that taking eerily awesome pictures with Ben and Meghann in SoHo alleyways is no longer part of my job.

HSBC Cancels Traveler's Credit Card, Pays For Their Mistake

Commented by Carey Alexander:
11:51 PM on August 11, 2009

@supercereal: I told the bank exactly how to reach me, and they had my phone number and email address. I wasn't in one place for the whole time so a forwarding address wasn't viable. Mind reading would have been a nice touch, but short of that, I would have been happy if they tried to get in touch before sending an active card to any address.

Commented by Carey Alexander:
8:09 PM on October 20, 2008

WAHOO!
What a weekend!
Staying out, sleeping in - so this is what I've been missing all those years. Hell, I should buy one of those demi-puppies myself so I can keep living the good life if Ben ever hires "me" back.

Not Even Mini Babybel Cheese Can Escape The Grocery Shrink Ray

Commented by Carey Alexander:
9:15 PM on July 5, 2008

Babybel's website claims that all varieties of the mini cheese are 21 grams per serving. The shrunken cheese above is only 20 grams per serving.

Dear New York Philharmonic: Please Don't Call Me In The Middle Of Performances To Ask For Money

Commented by Carey Alexander:
9:56 PM on June 21, 2008

Let's not be too harsh with our fellow commenters, or say anything to discredit the common misconception that us bloggers are exceptionally wealthy.

For those who care, the tickets were $12.

I'm just frustrated that they won't stop calling; and I don't have catalogs to burn.

Thanks, Northwest, For Flying Me To Chicago Because I Asked Nicely!

Commented by Carey Alexander:
6:42 PM on May 19, 2008

I understand the objections to using an Executive Email Carpet Bomb as anything but a corrective tool, and that is partly how it was used. My friend had a credit that would have been completely lost if it wasn't transferred. Customer service wouldn't let him transfer the credit, so we salvaged its value by launching an EECB.

My point in writing the post—a point missed by several commenters—was to show that a properly crafted EECB can be used by anyone to solve a wide range of problems. I can't stress enough how I went out of my way to keep the site separate from my communications with Northwest. Not only because using the site's name for my own personal gain is deeply unethical, but because I really did want to see how easy it was for any regular consumer to fix a problem with an EECB.

There's a difference between using an EECB recklessly and using it to advance an irregular request. Remember, if my friend's request was objectionable to them, they could have told him to walk in front of a jet engine, and that would have been that. More importantly, they had absolutely no way of knowing that my friend was in any way connected to the site. His request was judged solely on its merits. Because it was presented to people unencumbered by arbitrary rules, they were able to accommodate us.

Sending EECBs after exhausting all other options does not dilute their value. Sending poorly formed complaints or contacting executives without first trying other options might. Anyway, let's not lose site of the moral of the story: Executive Email Carpet Bombs work.

Republicans Have Killed The Passenger's Bill Of Rights. Long Live The Passenger's Bill Of Rights!

Commented by Carey Alexander:
5:43 PM on May 7, 2008

@Buran: Congress has extended FAA funding and taxes four times since September. The current extension runs through June. It's like when Congress fails to adopt a budget. We don't run out of money, we just extend the old budget until the new one is signed.

Writing "Ask For ID" On Your Credit Card Won't Stop Fraud, But It's Still A Good Idea

Commented by Carey Alexander:
12:48 AM on April 28, 2008

@Matthew Hughes: "It would certainly cast suspicion..." Mission accomplished! As I wrote in the first sentence, telling retailers to ask for identification "isn't an unimpeachable guarantee of security." It's just an extra hurdle.

That said, I like your scenario. Technically, you're probably right, but brushing aside whether or not the thief knows of, let alone carries, the cardholder agreement, making a principled stand probably wouldn't end well for the thief—at least not at IHOP or Walmart.

Writing "Ask For ID" On Your Credit Card Won't Stop Fraud, But It's Still A Good Idea

Commented by Carey Alexander:
10:57 PM on April 27, 2008

@petrarch1608, Skellbasher, Matthew Hughes, BugMeNot2, Hejustlaughs: Please make a small effort to read the post before rushing to comment. There is a world of difference between a merchant violating the cardholder agreement by demanding to see identification, and a consumer trying to extract an added measure of protection by asking retailers to verify identification. The former, as we've repeatedly pointed out, is not ok, but consumers can and should do everything in their power to protect themselves.

As I wrote in the post, adding "Ask for ID" is optional, and does not in any way replace a signature. This does not conflict with our previous advice.

If you don't want someone asking for your identification, then don't write "Ask for ID!" If you want a quick, free way to toss an extra hurdle between a thief and your card, then by all means, whip out the pen and add "Ask for ID" next to your signature.

Subscribe to feed Comments from Carey Alexander