um this was resolved within an Hour of being found... This is why they are letting these companies go in and try to find loop holes and errors. Give'em a break.

i hate his face

@Coder4Life: Also, insert "expectation of privacy on the internet" line here. Really, if you post your photos online, even if they're in a "friends only" section, expect them to get out.

hmmm... Yeah I'm not shocked here. But really if you're on Facebook and worried about your info getting out, isn't the best idea to not put private stuff on there?

I totally upload all my pictures even ones I don't want people to see. Then I expect the internet tubes not to suck them up and spit them out at random...

Someone needs to explain to this person that tubes don't understand that certain images are not public...

Only dump trucks know how to tell the difference.

This is so F-ing dumb.

News flash:
1) If you want a secret to stay a secret - DON'T TELL ANYONE
2) If you want your private fotos to stay private - DON'T POST THEM ON THE INTERWEBS

You ever notice how any story about him always includes a picture? Worth a thousand words, they say...

Also, I'm pissed that my Myspace private photo viewer isn't working anymore.

If your photos are really so private that you wouldn't want the whole world to see them, it would seem logical not to put them in a place where the whole world can potentially see them.

So, isn't the "taking it seriously" tag meant for stories that...well...the company in question didn't actually show that they were taking it seriously? The bug was fixed in an hour, how much more seriously are you expecting them to take it?

The bug may have been fixed within an hour after reporting, however the hole was open for months:

[www.readwriteweb.com]