Share:
Add to Favorites   |  

Is The Federal Housing Administration Going To Need A Bailout?

1815 views

Earlier today a former Fannie Mae exec and the current head of the FHA gave conflicting testimonies to Congress about the health of the mortgage insurer—particularly about whether or not it's going to require a taxpayer bailout in the next couple of years.

The Fannie Mae executive, Edward Pinto, told a House subcommittee that "it appears destined for a taxpayer bailout in the next 24 to 36 months" because further losses will wipe out its $30+ billion in cash reserves. The current FHA head, David H. Stevens, said there's no way that will happen. Well, "absent any catastrophic home price decline."

"Concerns Grow About Another Another Mortgage Giant" [New York Times]
(Photo: Redacted)

Post a comment

Comments:

11
user-pic

Why is it that anyone, from king to peon, has to taunt the Fates by uttering "Never." Have they no idea of what the Gods do to people who have a surplus of hubris?

user-pic

Why not? Bailouts for everyone!

user-pic

Must not be much security in the FHA head job. Hell, California alone will wipe out the reserves in the next year.

Where's Lex Luthor with his nuclear-powered subterranean coastline modification device when you need him?

user-pic

I think the truth is in the difference in stability between Fannie & Freddie and Ginnie. Ginnie Mae has done OK through all of this because it is fully government held and run. It doesn't have the private investor quotient. That seems to be the factor that is causing most of the problems.

user-pic

Why is a former FNMA exec, who drove that company into the ground, testifying that FHA will need a bailout? It would seem that his abilities as a seer leave a bit to be desired.

FHA doesn't just insure home mortgages. They also have enormous programs for multifamily housing both market rate and for low and moderate income families. I would think that most of those loans, other than the ones with deep subsidies, would be fairly stable.

user-pic

i read an interesting article that suggests you ignore these numbers for now, though i'm having trouble finding it. isn't that always the way. :(

keep in mind that the increase in delinquencies is partially due to the new HAMP (home affordable modification program) that started modifications earlier this year. as part of that program, FHA is actually acting as a release valve for private sector loans that are on the verge of default.

soooo, don't blame the FHA if it needs a little more money. blame the banks that were able to layoff their modification departments, outsource the work to the government & then transfer the loans off their balance sheets. previous to this new program, FHA delinquencies were HALF what most bank sheets were showing.

user-pic

Who would pay for that bailout? We don't have any money - according to President Obama about five months ago:

user-pic

"The current FHA head, David H. Stevens, said there's no way that will happen."


The four most dangerous words on Wall Street:
This time it's different.

user-pic

@Chumas:


Captain Smith of Titanic:


There's a line... often quoted... in the newspapers. "God Himself Could Not Sink This Ship". She was appropriately named! The Titan's dared to challenge the God's. And for their arrogance, they were cast down into hell.

user-pic

The photo is awesome. It's too late, man. Too late.