<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T10:32:56Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Google&apos;s New Music Search Launches, But Your Buying Options Remain The Same</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5392062" title="Google's New Music Search Launches, But Your Buying Options Remain The Same" />
    <published>2009-10-29T05:07:34Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-11T20:00:16Z</updated>
    <title>Google&apos;s New Music Search Launches, But Your Buying Options Remain The Same</title>
    <summary>--&gt;The new music search capabilities that Google introduced today will make it easier to quickly find a song you can&apos;t remember the name of, or sample some tracks from an artist you&apos;re interested in. But it&apos;s not so much a new service as a more efficient combination of a bunch of services already scattered around the web.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Chris Walters</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term=" E-commerce" />
    
    <category term="Amazon" />
    
    <category term="Google" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/consumerist/2009/10/102809-003-googlemusicsearch.jpg" width="160" height="160" class="left" />-->The new music search capabilities that <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/google-lifts-the-curtains-on-its-new-music-service/">Google introduced today</a> will make it easier to quickly find a song you can't remember the name of, or sample some tracks from an artist you're interested in. But it's not so much a new service as a more efficient combination of a bunch of services already scattered around the web.</p>
]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Probably the coolest new feature is that in the future, when you search for an artist or song, Google will present tracks along with other search results. Click on the track link and you'll be able to hear the song in its entirety once, through an arrangement with <a href="http://www.lala.com/">Lala.com</a>. (The New York Times says MySpace Music will be another track provider, but they may not offer the same "listen once" service.)</p>
<p>The other two features are that now Google will be smarter about identifying songs based on snippets of lyrics you enter, thanks to a partnership with Gracenote; and the search engine will also provide direct links to relevant Pandora, Imeem, and Rhapsody pages.</p>
<p>The reason Google is doing all of this: higher quality search results mean more traffic, and that means more ad sales. In other words, you'll still buy your songs through Lala or one of the other partners, which isn't a terrible deal considering Lala has probably the cheapest option around right now for � la carte song and album purchases. (The subscription-based eMusic is cheaper if you buy your music in bulk.)</p>
<p><a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/google-lifts-the-curtains-on-its-new-music-service/">"Google Lifts the Curtains on Its New Music Service"</a> [New York Times]<br />
(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dabasse/3522805317/">dabasse</a>)</p>
]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16474332</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16474332" />
    <title>Comment from Framling on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Framling</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16362760" rel="nofollow">PsiCop</a>: No, I know those.  This isn't classical, it's rock-ier.  Parsons-wise, it's *ud, and the notes are a dotted-quarter on the 2, a dotted-quarter on the three-and, and a quarter on the 1 of the second measure.</p><br />
<p>Anyway, drives me crazy.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16354738</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16354738" />
    <title>Comment from Framling on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Framling</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I was reeeeeally hoping this would include some ability to look songs up by Parsons code, but it's apparently just lyrics.</p><br />
<p>Which doesn't get me any closer to finding out the name of that one instrumental song that's like BAAAH-DAAH-DUM! that they always play in action movies while the characters all walk away from a huge explosion in slow motion.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T20:31:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16353272</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16353272" />
    <title>Comment from ARP on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>ARP</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5392062/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same#c16344090" rel="nofollow">humphrmi</a>: Paying royalties for previews and searches is up for debate (at least to the asshats at BMI and ASCAP).</p><br />
<p><a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/09/17/ascap.others.want.online.performance.fees/" rel="nofollow">[www.electronista.com]</a></p><br />
<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10355448-93.html" rel="nofollow">[news.cnet.com]</a></p><br />
<p>They argue that the previews are considered a performance under Copyright law and make a false (IMO) comparison to ringtones.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T19:43:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16351983</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16351983" />
    <title>Comment from caveman1428 on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>caveman1428</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16345120" rel="nofollow">PsiCop</a>: agree with you completely.  the same goes for their new image search features.  i, like you, assumed when they said they've just "rolled it out" that meant it was up and running but it still doesnt work!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T18:57:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16350347</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16350347" />
    <title>Comment from ratsafari on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>ratsafari</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16343421" rel="nofollow">umbriago</a>:</p>
<p>I'm brought back here thanks to your link, Where's my Bowie? :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T16:55:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16348804</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16348804" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16343421" rel="nofollow">umbriago</a>: That's impressive Google-fu, admirable grasshopper!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T11:58:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16348792</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16348792" />
    <title>Comment from Several on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Several</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16343826" rel="nofollow">Michael Belisle</a>:  Believe me, it's nowhere near the DL. Find out how many pop-up advertisers have made fake directories to prey on this practice.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T11:57:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16348785</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16348785" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16342687" rel="nofollow">Hotscot</a>: You have to hum the song you're looking for while typing "music" into the Google TEdit box. But LOUDLY.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T11:56:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16348291</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16348291" />
    <title>Comment from MooseOfReason on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>MooseOfReason</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Still not live.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T10:51:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16346382</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16346382" />
    <title>Comment from metsarethe... on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>metsarethe...</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16344090" rel="nofollow">humphrmi</a>:  I started humming a song in my head, to whom do I need to pay royalities?  haha</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T08:23:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16345120</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16345120" />
    <title>Comment from PsiCop on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>PsiCop</name>
        <uri>http://www.agnostic-library.com/ma/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.agnostic-library.com/ma/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I fear maybe the tech world has passed me by (and that's not good considering I work in IT). I mean, according to the NYT Bits blog, Google has "lifted the curtain" on this service, and "formally rolled it out." But I just tried it and it doesn't seem to be working.</p>
<p>Maybe Google has redefined terms like "rolled out" and "lifted the curtain" and all of those other phrases that imply "it's working right now" but doesn't actually mean that it is? Back in the day, when we "rolled out" a software product, or an update to one, it meant it was actually <i>there</i> and <i>working</i>. A "formal rollout" was even more definitive than that. Does the phrase "formal rollout" have a new meaning that I wasn't aware of?</p>
<p>... Just thinking out loud. Given that it's Google we're talking about, I don't expect a coherent answer.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T07:26:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16344731</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16344731" />
    <title>Comment from TCama on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>TCama</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>So it's just like Google Image Search. It's not providing you with the actual content, it's just finding the content and putting you in touch with the person/place that has it. Right?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T07:09:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16344090</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16344090" />
    <title>Comment from humphrmi on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>humphrmi</name>
        <uri>http://famille.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://famille.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16342837" rel="nofollow">Al Swearengen</a>: You don't need to pay royalties to provide a search function that finds you songs based on lyrics, performance dates, album names, etc.  And as Michael Belisle pointed out, the links to play the music are through Lala which has its own agreements with RIAA.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T06:38:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16343826</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16343826" />
    <title>Comment from Michael Belisle on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Belisle</name>
        <uri>http://www.smift.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smift.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16343421" rel="nofollow">umbriago</a>: That strikes me as the sort of search strategy you're supposed to keep on the DL, lest the secret get out.</p>
<p>I'm banning you from the Alliance of Magicians.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T06:22:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16343421</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16343421" />
    <title>Comment from umbriago on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>umbriago</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>But if I want a David Bowie MP3, I still can Google</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%E2%80%9Cparent+directory%E2%80%9D+mp3+OR+wma+OR+ogg+OR+wav+David+Bowie+-html+-htm+-download+-links&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow">"parent directory" mp3 OR wma OR ogg OR wav David Bowie -ht...</a></p>
<p>and still help myself, apparently, judging by the first result.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T05:59:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16343295</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16343295" />
    <title>Comment from Michael Belisle on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Belisle</name>
        <uri>http://www.smift.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smift.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16342837" rel="nofollow">Al Swearengen</a>: Yes of course someone is paying royalties, apparently Lala in the screenshot. The great Online Webcaster Royalty Battle Royale of <a href="http://www.wired.com/listening_post/2007/03/us_copyright_ro/" rel="nofollow">2007</a>-<a href="http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2009/07/soundexchange-cuts-deal-on-music-webcasting-rates.ars" rel="nofollow">2009</a> wasn't fought so that Google could launch a service to stream music without paying royalties.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T05:51:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16343215</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16343215" />
    <title>Comment from Michael Belisle on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Belisle</name>
        <uri>http://www.smift.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smift.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google Music Onebox, powered by the all of the minor players in online music and none of the major ones.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T05:47:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16342946</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16342946" />
    <title>Comment from Chris Walters on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Walters</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/consumerchris</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/consumerchris">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16342687" rel="nofollow">Hotscot</a>: I think it will just be integrated into regular search, and I don't think it's live yet.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T05:33:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16342837</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16342837" />
    <title>Comment from Al Swearengen on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Al Swearengen</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Are they paying royalties? I imagine if they are not the RIAA will sue them for "performance rights"</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T05:27:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16342687</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16342687" />
    <title>Comment from Hotscot on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hotscot</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Is there a link to their new Music Search..I can't find it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T05:18:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062-comment:16342657</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5392062" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/googles-new-music-search-launches-but-your-buying-options-remain-the-same.html#c16342657" />
    <title>Comment from Munchie on 2009-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Munchie</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I hope they make a separate music search section.  Please don't put more irrelevant results in my searches.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T05:16:54Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>


