<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T10:35:24Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for DirecTV Resurrects Chris Farley In Questionable Ad</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5389963" title="DirecTV Resurrects Chris Farley In Questionable Ad" />
    <published>2009-10-26T19:10:50Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-28T09:47:12Z</updated>
    <title>DirecTV Resurrects Chris Farley In Questionable Ad</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Is anyone else skeeved out over the DirecTV ad? Based on the movie Tommy Boy, in which Chris Farley &mdash; who died in 1997 due to a drug overdose and heart complications &mdash; the spot shows Farley doing his famed Fat Guy in a Little Coat Dance as co-star David Spade re-dubs his character's dialogue.]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Phil Villarreal</name>
      <uri>http://becauseitoldyouso.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="DirecTV" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[
<p>Is anyone else skeeved out over the DirecTV ad? Based on the movie Tommy Boy, in which Chris Farley &mdash; who died in 1997 due to a drug overdose and heart complications &mdash; the spot shows Farley doing his famed Fat Guy in a Little Coat Dance as co-star David Spade re-dubs his character's dialogue.</p>
<p>It's bizarre that Spade, a close pal of Farley's, went along with this. He and DirecTV must have miscalculated the ad as a tribute to a great movie moment rather than a disturbing, insensitive money grab.</p>
<p>Or maybe Comcast put together the ad as a way to drive people away from DirecTV.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JFfKUF2kFPQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JFfKUF2kFPQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/consumerist/2009/10/JFfKUF2kFPQ.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/>--></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mepreport.com/2009/10/directv-profits-off-the-dead/">DirecTV Profits Off the Dead</a> [The Mep Report]<br>
<i>(Thanks, Russ!)</i></p>
]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16508056</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16508056" />
    <title>Comment from baristabrawl on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>baristabrawl</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>Seriously?  He was funny, but he kinda killed himself.  I feel bad about that, but there's only so bad you can feel, right?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16324889</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16324889" />
    <title>Comment from jrm82 on 2009-10-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>jrm82</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't think that this is terrible in anyway.  It is a clip from a movie.  I really feel that objections to it is like saying that TBS shouldn't rerun Tommy Boy.  I can't think of specific examples, but I'm sure I've seen commercials with footage from older movies (30s and 40s) with stars that are most likely deceased.  I just see it as a funny movie clip.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-28T20:20:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16297530</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16297530" />
    <title>Comment from ShadowFalls on 2009-10-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>ShadowFalls</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267137" rel="nofollow">AirIntake</a>:</p>
<p>I don't really see the problem with it. It is kind of clever really. Do people have a problem with this just because the one guy is dead? I mean it isn't like they butchered it or anything.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T21:31:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16288689</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16288689" />
    <title>Comment from Aquasol on 2009-10-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Aquasol</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16286590" rel="nofollow">AngryK9</a>: I think sixth toe. D:</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T11:19:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16286656</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16286656" />
    <title>Comment from AngryK9 on 2009-10-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>AngryK9</name>
        <uri>http://www.realms-rp.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.realms-rp.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Well, you still watch movies with dead actors in them...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T08:24:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16286590</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16286590" />
    <title>Comment from AngryK9 on 2009-10-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>AngryK9</name>
        <uri>http://www.realms-rp.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.realms-rp.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5389963/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad#c16275579" rel="nofollow">karmaghost</a>: I think Kennedy and conspiracy. :D</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T08:19:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16285902</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16285902" />
    <title>Comment from biggeek3 on 2009-10-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>biggeek3</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Maybe they can use Phil Hartman next.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T07:30:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16283128</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16283128" />
    <title>Comment from P_Smith on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>P_Smith</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Who is Chris Farley?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T04:53:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16280633</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16280633" />
    <title>Comment from gparlett on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>gparlett</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>When this came on I started to laugh and my wife asked me why it was funny... "Well, see he a fat man, and he's wearing a little coat... fat man in a little coat." "Yeah, I get that, but like is it from anything?"... I felt so old... these are the perils of marrying someone who is 7 years younger than you.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T02:53:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16280484</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16280484" />
    <title>Comment from gparlett on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>gparlett</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16268482" rel="nofollow">angryneo</a>: maybe he didn't "practice good hygiene"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T02:46:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16279673</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16279673" />
    <title>Comment from TVGenius on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>TVGenius</name>
        <uri>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3845570794205845895</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3845570794205845895">
        <![CDATA[<p>I thought it was cool.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T02:16:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16279553</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16279553" />
    <title>Comment from SadSam on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>SadSam</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5389963/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad#c16269615" rel="nofollow">magic8ball</a>:</p><br />
<p>It made me sad, poor Farley.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T02:13:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16278241</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16278241" />
    <title>Comment from drjayphd on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>drjayphd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>EXCLUSIVE photo from the negotiations for this ad campaign below...</p>
<p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T01:31:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16278156</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16278156" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5389963/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad#c16275746" rel="nofollow">leastcmplicated</a>: That's a great point. I was racking my brain, trying to think of all the other ones and I couldn't come up with one in which the actor who played the character had already died. Thanks for reminding me of the Poltergeist girl.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T01:29:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16278094</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16278094" />
    <title>Comment from drjayphd on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>drjayphd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267477" rel="nofollow">tomok97</a>: He made this commercial a real long time ago, back in ninety-fo.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T01:27:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16277364</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16277364" />
    <title>Comment from squishyalt on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>squishyalt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's DirecTV....what did you expect?  Morality?  Ethics?  Common decency?</p>
<p>Have you met DirecTV before?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T01:07:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16277265</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16277265" />
    <title>Comment from zlionsfan on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>zlionsfan</name>
        <uri>http://zlionsfan.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://zlionsfan.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16270114" rel="nofollow">eirrom</a>: agreed. I can understand a company like DirecTV looking at some of the extreme bits of unfunny that pass for ads these days and saying "nah, let's run with this for another year", but that still doesn't make it funny. I thought it was not funny because it was stale, not because Farley is dead.</p>
<p>Well, that and I never cared much for either comedian's humor in the first place.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T01:04:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16276602</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16276602" />
    <title>Comment from Batwaffel on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Batwaffel</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267190" rel="nofollow">techstar25</a>: I too see nothing wrong with it. I'm glad Spade still remembers those days fondly.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T00:43:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16276571</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16276571" />
    <title>Comment from cskelldog on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>cskelldog</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I understand what they were doing with the ad. I just don't like it, once it was over, it gave me a bad taste in my mouth. If they would use Chris Farley in anything these days, It needs to be a tribute, not to buy shitty cable</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T00:42:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16275746</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16275746" />
    <title>Comment from leastcmplicated on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>leastcmplicated</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267268" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: +1 on the Orville Redenbacher, that IS creepy.  I laughed when I saw it because I was reminded of Tommy Boy, i wasnt the least bit creeped out.  Also, they used at least one other dead person in those commercials in the past, the girl in poltergeist movies.  Honestly, i dont think they really care at this point... *shrug*</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T00:14:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16275579</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16275579" />
    <title>Comment from karmaghost on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>karmaghost</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267154" rel="nofollow">GMFish</a>: So when is the statute of limitations up?  Dead actors, actresses, and musicians have been appearing in commercials for years and years.  Do people remember someone for how they lived or how they died?</p>
<p>When I say "Marilyn Monroe" do you think "a blowing white dress" or do you think "drug overdose?"</p>
<p>Maybe what matters is if they were alive and in the public eye while you were a live.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T00:09:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16275415</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16275415" />
    <title>Comment from jmsbmck on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>jmsbmck</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>It is HILARIOUS. Saw it for the first time last night and did a double-take because I thought the movie was actually being shown. They did a good job with it!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-27T00:03:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16274515</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16274515" />
    <title>Comment from twophrasebark on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>twophrasebark</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's creepy.</p>
<p>Maybe they should have had Spade pull out Farley's skull from behind the sofa and say "Sorry, buddy. Spade's gotta eat."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T23:36:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16274428</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16274428" />
    <title>Comment from JimBoSlobish on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>JimBoSlobish</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I thought it was off a bit at first, but love it now.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T23:33:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16274050</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16274050" />
    <title>Comment from Red_Eye on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Red_Eye</name>
        <uri>http://www.patentlystupid.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.patentlystupid.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267210" rel="nofollow">RonDiaz</a>: That would be correct.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T23:22:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16273613</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16273613" />
    <title>Comment from Zagroseckt on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Zagroseckt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>i thought it was funny<br />
and yes i know he's passed on</p>
<p>So is the guy who did the popcorn<br />
now THAT was creeeeepy</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T23:06:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16272905</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16272905" />
    <title>Comment from dpeters11 on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>dpeters11</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>It wasn't as creepy as the Heather O'Rourke spot. But her mother said that she not only approved it, she thought it was a good tribute. If the estate approves the use, approves of the final product, then I'm fine with it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T22:41:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16272751</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16272751" />
    <title>Comment from coffeeculture on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>coffeeculture</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267154" rel="nofollow">GMFish</a>: try creepy...i was sortof creeped out.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T22:35:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16270232</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16270232" />
    <title>Comment from coan_net on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>coan_net</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267190" rel="nofollow">techstar25</a>: Sorry, I don't see anything wrong with it.</p>
<p>Nice ad - funny scene.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T21:11:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16270114</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16270114" />
    <title>Comment from eirrom on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>eirrom</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>When I saw this ad, the last thing thing that came to me was that this was disrespectful towards Chris Farley. It was just a clip of one of his most popular movies. What is the harm with that?</p><br />
<p>What I did think was that this ad and all the similar ads that Direct TV has done recent are just getting old. The ad style is worn and needs to be put away. How many more movies are they going to try this with? Funny the first time. Not so much now.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T21:07:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16270027</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16270027" />
    <title>Comment from bhaughey on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>bhaughey</name>
        <uri>http://www.wylion.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wylion.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I can't wait for the Silence of the Lambs version. Jame Gumb is saying "It puts the lotion in the basket," pan down to the poor girl in the well... "Boy, I sure wish I had DirecTV down here..."</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T21:05:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16269957</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16269957" />
    <title>Comment from bhaughey on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>bhaughey</name>
        <uri>http://www.wylion.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wylion.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>It was only annoying because after only 1 football game, I was singing "Fat Guy in Little Coat" all day.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T21:03:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16269795</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16269795" />
    <title>Comment from bornonbord on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>bornonbord</name>
        <uri>http://www.greenpopsicle.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.greenpopsicle.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16269068" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: But you see this ad as a tribute and less of a money grab.  I see it as exploiting not only a dead person, but a relationship.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:58:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16269762</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16269762" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267268" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: I donno, though.<br />
Farley never appeared in ads, or at least so rarely that I don't recall them.<br />
Spade's a whore for cheap ads, so the appearance is that he's dragging his "buddy's" corpse alongside him to earn a paycheck he'd otherwise not be able to earn. (shudder)</p>
<p>It's not that that late night ad guy who OD'd where they posted an ad post-mortum: selling orange Windex was what he did. Creepy and in poor taste, but it's clear it's what he would have done.</p>
<p>Farley's different, given his behavior before he died. So DirecTV is creepy and David Spade is a ghoulish freak whoring the memory of his "friend".</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:57:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16269650</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16269650" />
    <title>Comment from BigFoot_Pete on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>BigFoot_Pete</name>
        <uri>http://www.digitalblasphemy.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.digitalblasphemy.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>One of Farley's more iconic scenes... I think it's great that people get a chuckle out of it again.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:53:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16269615</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16269615" />
    <title>Comment from magic8ball on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>magic8ball</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267194" rel="nofollow">paris1886</a>: Has it been 12 years already?? Yikes.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:52:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16269596</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16269596" />
    <title>Comment from bohemian on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>bohemian</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267334" rel="nofollow">MickeyMoo</a>: I think both are in bad taste.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:52:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16269544</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16269544" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267190" rel="nofollow">techstar25</a>: Farley was a good sport, too.<br />
Oh. Wait.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:50:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16269534</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16269534" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16268293" rel="nofollow">Ronin-Democrat</a>: The one I actually like is a British PSA by late comedian Bob Monkhouse, who died of prostate cancer, for prostate cancer awareness.  It's quite well done.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:49:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16269462</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16269462" />
    <title>Comment from pinkbunnyslippers on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>pinkbunnyslippers</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Meh - I think fans of Spade/Farley ultimately see the humor in this and have little to no issue with it. Besides, I highly doubt David Spade would've gone along with it had he felt it was cruel or insensitive to his good friend's memory.</p><br />
<p>I'm sure Chris Farley is up at some big bar in the sky smiling down, knowing he still lives on ;)</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:47:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16269439</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16269439" />
    <title>Comment from mazzic1083 on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>mazzic1083</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5389963/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad#c16267293" rel="nofollow">segfault</a>: Say dad I can't see real well, is that Bill Shakespeare over there?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:47:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16269375</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16269375" />
    <title>Comment from HogwartsAlum on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>HogwartsAlum</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>?? I haven't seen this on my DTV.  (can't watch the video at work)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:44:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16269262</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16269262" />
    <title>Comment from Japheaux on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Japheaux</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The least they could have done was added a reference to the Little Rascals and have Farley ask if Spanky is your favorite.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:41:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16269068</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16269068" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5389963/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad#c16268649" rel="nofollow">bornonbord</a>: I wasn't talking about the intent of the commercial, only that by using the film footage of Farley, it wasn't nearly as creepy as digitally re-creating Orville Redenbacher, who by 2007 (when the new commercials launched) was long dead. I have no problem with using Farley to promote DirecTV because it's not really too important what Farley may have thought about DirecTV. It's not as if Phillip Morris wanted to use his likeness and image to promote cigarettes.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:34:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16268649</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16268649" />
    <title>Comment from bornonbord on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>bornonbord</name>
        <uri>http://www.greenpopsicle.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.greenpopsicle.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267268" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: Yeah, but this is not a spokesperson being re-used to sell a product.  They are essentially using Chris Farley to advertise a product that he probably didn't even know about in his lifetime.</p>
<p>And the fact that it's David Spade in it as well is really weird.  He almost looks awkward participating.</p>
<p>It would be a tribute if it were more centered on Farley and all of life legacy of Farley - kind of like that "what if James Dean lived" ad.<a></a></p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:19:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16268614</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16268614" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5389963/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad#c16267669" rel="nofollow">JPropaganda</a>: It looks like the May 21 book event at the Verona Public Library was for 2009 since it's not listed under the 2008 event listings. Some small nonprofits can only do one or two major events a year.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:18:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16268568</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16268568" />
    <title>Comment from Thaddeus on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Thaddeus</name>
        <uri>http://consumerist.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Skeeved about covers it.  I find this ad to be in bad taste due to the unfortunate death of Farley but it wont make me any more or less inclined to purchase DirectTV.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:16:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16268482</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16268482" />
    <title>Comment from angryneo on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>angryneo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Is it because the guy had "a bit of a weight problem"? Let it go.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:13:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16268293</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16268293" />
    <title>Comment from Ronin-Democrat on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ronin-Democrat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>we see lots of dead celebs selling things or their image/voice being used to sell the celeb themself.</p>
<p>monroe<br />
dean<br />
wayne<br />
elvis<br />
che<br />
malcolm x</p>
<p>like a poster said...... i've got other things to worry about.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:06:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16268149</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16268149" />
    <title>Comment from VioletPheonix on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>VioletPheonix</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267227" rel="nofollow">aphex242</a>: @<a href="#c16267154" rel="nofollow">GMFish</a>: Really? I didn't see it that way, I thought he did a good job of keeping in character with the movie. At the time David Spade would have liked to be anywhere in the world then with Chris Farley, and the ad managed to capture that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T20:00:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267961</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267961" />
    <title>Comment from PLATTWORX on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>PLATTWORX</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I find it odd this story does not even hint at the fact that rights to Chris Farley's work would be owned by his estate/family and THEY would have had to approve this ad for it to have been done.</p><br />
<p>Did we think that perhaps Chris Farley's family was cool with this and asked David Spade to participate? While no mega-star, I am sure Spade didn't need the couple extra bucks.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:53:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267816</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267816" />
    <title>Comment from Preyfar on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Preyfar</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267227" rel="nofollow">aphex242</a>: Farley wanted to entertain to the very end. I don't think he'd have had a problem with that. I don't think Spade would ever have done anything to soil Farley's memories. The two were inseparable.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:47:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267729</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267729" />
    <title>Comment from rdm on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>rdm</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267623" rel="nofollow">Vermifuge</a>: That is true, but we can just watch the Tommy Boy DVD to laugh at the original content instead of this creepy revamp that Spade is cashing in on.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:43:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267669</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267669" />
    <title>Comment from JPropaganda on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>JPropaganda</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonpickar.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jasonpickar.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267443" rel="nofollow">QuantumRiff</a>: Seeing as their last event was May 21 2008, something tells me the foundation isn't very active these days.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:40:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267630</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267630" />
    <title>Comment from Beefmaster on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Beefmaster</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think the commercial was fine and didnt give me any weird "emotions." however if michael jackson is the theme for DirecTV's next old movie type add, that will be weird.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:39:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267623</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267623" />
    <title>Comment from Vermifuge on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Vermifuge</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>So just becasue he is dead we are not allowed to laugh at / with him?  I don't think he would have wanted it that way.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:38:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267594</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267594" />
    <title>Comment from bloggerX on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>bloggerX</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Stay classy, DirecTV.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:37:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267547</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267547" />
    <title>Comment from dfens42 on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>dfens42</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5389963/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad#c16267293" rel="nofollow">segfault</a>:</p><br />
<p><a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/4183/saturday-night-live-down-by-the-river" rel="nofollow">[www.hulu.com]</a></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:35:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267477</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267477" />
    <title>Comment from tomok97 on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>tomok97</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5389963/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad#c16267219" rel="nofollow">BeyondtheTech</a>: I saw Tupac at McDonalds.<br /><a></a></p><br />
<a></a><br /><a>+ Watch video</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<p></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:32:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267443</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267443" />
    <title>Comment from QuantumRiff on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>QuantumRiff</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267227" rel="nofollow">aphex242</a>: His brother runs a non-profit <a href="http://www.chrisfarleyfoundation.org" rel="nofollow">[www.chrisfarleyfoundation.org]</a> that helps kids stay away from Substance abuse.  I would guess this is where the money went, since it was created from his estate.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:30:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267367</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267367" />
    <title>Comment from MaBelle on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>MaBelle</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5389963/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad#c16267268" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: nor is this Farley resurrection as creepy as the Dirt Devil (?) commercials where Fred Astaire danced with a vacuum cleaner. Now if Chris's lines had been dubbed over, that would bother me.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:27:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267334</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267334" />
    <title>Comment from MickeyMoo on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>MickeyMoo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>No worse than re-appropriating Audrey Hepburn to shill for crappy GAP jeans.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:25:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267311</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267311" />
    <title>Comment from GMFish on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>GMFish</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267184" rel="nofollow">sbcpunkrocker</a>: "<i>I've got other things to worry about.</i>"</p>
<p>But yet you have time to waste posting comments here.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:25:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267298</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267298" />
    <title>Comment from segfault on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>segfault</name>
        <uri>http://slashdot.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://slashdot.org/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16267293" rel="nofollow">segfault</a>: Or ad, even.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:24:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267293</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267293" />
    <title>Comment from segfault on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>segfault</name>
        <uri>http://slashdot.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://slashdot.org/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's a dumb add.  Whoever thought that up needs to go live in a van, down by the river.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:24:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267268</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267268" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I didn't interpret it as being questionable. The man died, albeit in a very tragic way, but that was over 10 years ago. That scene is the most famous one in the movie. I saw the commercial as being more of a tribute and less of a money grab because it is a pretty iconic scene.</p><br />
<p>It's not like the Orville Redenbacher commercials in which they digitally resurrected the popcorn king. Now <i>that</i> is creepy.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:23:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267227</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267227" />
    <title>Comment from Aphex242 on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Aphex242</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Meh I like it.  I agree it's a little odd, but I'm guessing Farley's family is seeing something from it, so no harm done.  It's a great movie, and being reminded of it doesn't bother me a bit.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:21:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267219</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267219" />
    <title>Comment from BeyondtheTech on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>BeyondtheTech</name>
        <uri>http://www.beyondthetech.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.beyondthetech.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Chris Farley is dead?!</p>
<p>I just saw him last week with Tupac at the O-Town concert.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:21:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267210</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267210" />
    <title>Comment from RonDiaz on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>RonDiaz</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Haven't they used all kinds of dead celebrities in these types of ads...?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:21:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267194</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267194" />
    <title>Comment from paris1886 on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>paris1886</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I had the same feelings when I saw it. My first thought was that it's too soon...then realized Farley died 12 years ago, but it still makes me feel uncomfortable.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:20:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267192</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267192" />
    <title>Comment from Darrone on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Darrone</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>YES.  You get David Spade for $7 an hour, and you have an excuse to use Chris Farley's dead corpse.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:20:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267190</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267190" />
    <title>Comment from techstar25 on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>techstar25</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I like it. It's funny. Spade is a good sport, and it was a great scene.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:20:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267184</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267184" />
    <title>Comment from sbcpunkrocker on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>sbcpunkrocker</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've got other things to worry about.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:19:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267154</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267154" />
    <title>Comment from GMFish on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>GMFish</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Farley is apparently alive again and Spade would rather watch TV?!  The ad is mean-spirited and cruel.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:18:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963-comment:16267137</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5389963" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/directv-resurrects-chris-farley-in-questionable-ad.html#c16267137" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Eh, I like it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-26T19:17:47Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>


