Al Franken: How Many Medical Bankruptcies Are There In Switzerland?
We stray into politics often at our peril but I had to share this clip of Sen. Franken kneecapping a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute conservative think tank. In what was supposed to be a hearing on the Medical Bankruptcy Fairness Act, Diana Furchtgott-Roth instead used her testimony to pillory against health care reform proposals not even being discussed. After Sen. Whitehouse asks her if she even read the bill at hand, Sen. Franken goes: "You said the way we're going will increase bankruptcies...How many bankruptcies because of medical crises were there last year in Switzerland?"
<- Franken clip.
In the second clip, Sen. Whitehouse asks: "Did you actually read the bill that is the subject of today's hearing?"
Here she uses the big "UC" - that less strict bankruptcy laws have the "unintended consequence" of encouraging more people to seek bankruptcy. Her solution to so many medical bankruptcies is then to make it harder to seek bankruptcy, rather than addressing the underlying over-inflated costs that drive consumers into medical bankruptcy in the first place.
Pharmaceutical companies like Eli Lilly, Merck and Novartis number among The Hudson Institute's funders.
You can watch the entire session and read and search the transcript here on C-SPAN.
(Thanks to Dirk!)
Post a comment
Comments:
@ecwis: I believe, as the consumerist usually does, it is pointing towards an effort by major companies to either deny or lie about things, except she was caught and visually you can see her suffer where she thought it was going to be a simple stating of "facts".
@Darklighter: Technically they chose way back. It took Norm Coleman all that time to stop wasting peoples time and money.
@futuresuperbowlMVPJayCutler: I like it at 2:10 when she rotates her head on an axis while keeping her eyes on Franken.
@Skankingmike: Why do you think his time in office is short? He will be in until at least 2014. I think Minnesota voters are going to love him.
@thezone: you keep believing that.
Lets hope Madison is wrong in that it takes you several years to truly understand how the system works.
@jmurphy42: He's also a huge policy wonk and intellectual. So, he actually reads the bills and can discuss policy. He's not the person to mess with when you lie about what a bill does or does not do.
Franken was great as usual, but Sen. Whitehouse's interaction with that woman was incredibly satisfying.
It's like when I sit down with a typical BS-er student to talk about how they only pretend to do work. And we have almost exactly the same conversation... And they usually get the exact same look on their faces.
Heh. heheh.
Also: Franken addresses her as "Dr." but she's not a doctor.
Also, scary facts: This individual was Chief Economist at the DoL under Bush and was Chief of Staff for his Council of Economic Advisors. So, she's obviously known for her spot-on research skills.
@MaxSmart32: Gah, I'm sorry, I broke the guidebook on comments...I realized after I posed it an email would have been more appropriate. My apologies to my Consumerist friends!
We should absolutely address those "underlying over-inflated costs," but doing so is going to require either price controls on doctors and hospitals, or reducing the volume of care consumed.
We have two health care problems in this country:
1. Too many people don't have health care.
2. We spend too much on health care.
The proposed reforms take a shot at dealing with #1, but they don't do anything about (and actually make worse) #2.
It's about time someone stood up to TEH STOOOPID. I'm so sick of bad studies and spurious correlations being used to justify bad policy (and to be fair, it's not like the Dems are innocent of it either).
Why is it that comedians do the best job of smacking down with the truth these days? Why can Stewart/Colbert find the video that contradicts the politicians who claim to have never said a given thing, but the "real" news networks don't bother? Maybe the comedians are smarter than the average network talking-point parrot?
@TCama:
Complaint: Why can't we work as a team to reduce emissions and our dependence on oil?
Response: 9/11.
@JGKojak: I wish he was my Senator. Although having Claire McCaskill as a Senator is not too shabby either.
@NeverLetMeDown: 1. Too many people don't have health care so skip out on their medical bills. This leads to 2. where the hospitals have to make up their losses by jacking up prices for people that DO have health care. Therefore, 1 begets 2.
Furchgott-Roth, I'm guessing, is a spouse or other relation to Harold Furchgott-Roth, former FCC Commissioner, later another rightwing thinktanker, and overall out-of-touch lunatic who worships the free-market fairy dust. And to think THESE are the people the Republicans want as the face of their "movement?" Keep talking, lady, please please keep talking.
@redskull: I suggest getting Rachel Maddow into the senate instead. Easier than cloning with similar end result (complete with endearingly nerdy glasses).
@ARP: The man is absolutely brilliant. Too bad he didn't use that on his book titles, heh. Disclaimer: I've read parts of Lying Liars, and it was chock full of statistics and really good analysis.

In the second clip, Sen. Whitehouse asks: "Did you actually read the bill that is the subject of today's hearing?"


















Facepalm!